The present invention relates generally to high-performance computing (HPC), and particularly to communication among collaborating software processes using collective operations.
Collective communications are used by groups of computing nodes to exchange data in connection with a distributed processing application. In HPC, for example, the nodes are typically software processes running in parallel, for example on different computing cores. The nodes exchange collective communications with one another in connection with parallel program tasks carried out by the processes. The term “collective operation” is used in the present description and in the claims to refer to functions performed concurrently by multiple processes (and possibly all the processes) participating in a parallel processing task. These collective operations typically include communication functions, in which the processes in the group concurrently transmit and receive data to and from other processes in the group via a communication medium. These functions are referred to as “collective communications.” The collective communications among processes may be exchanged over any suitable communication medium, such as over a physical network, for example a high-speed switch fabric or packet network, or via shared memory within a computer.
Various protocols have been developed to support collective communications. One of the best-known protocols is the Message Passing Interface (MPI), which enables processes to move data from their own address spaces to the address spaces of other processes through cooperative operations carried out by each process in a process group. In MPI parlance, the process group is referred to as a “communicator,” and each member process is identified as a “rank.” MPI collective operations include all-to-all, all-to-all-v, and all-to-all-w operations, which gather and scatter data from all ranks to all other ranks in a communicator. In the operation all-to-all, each process in the communicator sends a fixed-size message to each of the other processes. The operations all-to-all-v and all-to-all-w are similar to the operation all-to-all, but the messages may differ in size. In all-to-all-w, the messages may also contain different data types.
In naïve implementations of all-to-all-v and all-to-all-w, each member process transmits messages to all other member processes in the group. In large-scale HPC distributed applications, the group can include thousands of processes running on respective processing cores, meaning that millions of messages are exchanged following each processing stage. To reduce the communication burden associated with this message exchange, message aggregation protocols have been proposed.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 10,521,283 describes in-node aggregation of MPI all-to-all and all-to-all-v collectives. An MPI collective operation is carried out in a fabric of network elements by transmitting MPI messages from all the initiator processes in an initiator node to designated responder processes in respective responder nodes. Respective payloads of the MPI messages are combined in a network interface device of the initiator node to form an aggregated MPI message. The aggregated MPI message is transmitted through the fabric to network interface devices of responder nodes, which disaggregate the aggregated MPI message into individual messages and distribute the individual messages to the designated responder node processes.
Embodiments of the present invention that are described hereinbelow provide efficient methods for collective communications, as well as systems and software implementing such methods.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a method for collective communications, which includes invoking a collective operation over a group of computing processes in which the processes in the group concurrently transmit and receive data to and from other processes in the group via a communication medium. Messages are composed for transmission by source processes in the group, including metadata indicating how the data to be transmitted by the source processes in the collective operation are to be handled by destination processes that are to receive the data and also including in at least some of the messages the data to be transmitted by one or more of the source processes to one or more of the destination processes. The composed messages are transmitted concurrently from the source processes to the destination processes in the group over the communication medium. The data are processed by the destination processes in response to the metadata included in the messages received by the destination processes.
In a disclosed embodiment, composing the messages includes incorporating the data together with the metadata in the messages when a size of the data for transmission from a given source process to a given destination process is less than a predefined threshold, and transmitting only the metadata without the data when the size of the data for transmission from the given source process to the given destination process is greater than the predefined threshold, whereby the destination process retrieves the data from the source process using the metadata in the messages.
Additionally or alternatively, transmitting the composed messages includes, for at least some of the messages, transmitting the messages having respective sizes that are greater than a predefined threshold to the destination processes without aggregation, and aggregating the messages for which the respective sizes are less than the predefined threshold and transmitting the aggregated messages to the destination processes.
In some embodiments, processing the data includes transmitting, responsively to the metadata in a message received by a destination process, a request from the destination process to the source process to convey the data from the source process to the destination process, whereby the source process transmits the data to the destination process responsively to the request. In a disclosed embodiment, transmitting the request includes transmitting a remote direct memory access (RDMA) read request from the destination process to the source process.
In some embodiments, invoking the collective operation includes initiating an all-to-all-v, all-to-all-w, all-gather-v, gather-v, or scatter-v operation.
There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a system for collective communications, including multiple processors, which are interconnected by a communication medium and are programmed to run respective computing processes. Upon receiving an invocation of a collective operation over a group of the processes in which the processes in the group are to concurrently transmit and receive data to and from other processes in the group via a communication medium, the processors compose, for transmission by source processes in the group, messages including metadata indicating how the data to be transmitted by the source processes in the collective operation are to be handled by destination processes that are to receive the data and also including in at least some of the messages the data to be transmitted by one or more of the source processes to one or more of the destination processes. The processors transmit the composed messages concurrently from the source processes to the destination processes in the group over the communication medium. The processors process the data in the destination processes in response to the metadata included in the messages received by the destination processes.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a computer software product for collective communications among a group of computing processes running on processors, which are interconnected by a communication medium. The product includes a tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium in which program instructions are stored, which instructions cause the processors, upon receiving an invocation of a collective operation over a group of the processes in which the processes in the group are to concurrently transmit and receive data to and from other processes in the group via a communication medium, to compose, for transmission by source processes in the group, messages including metadata indicating how the data to be transmitted by the source processes in the collective operation are to be handled by destination processes that are to receive the data and also including in at least some of the messages the data to be transmitted by one or more of the source processes to one or more of the destination processes. The instructions cause the processors to transmit the composed messages concurrently from the source processes to the destination processes in the group over the communication medium, and to process the data in the destination processes in response to the metadata included in the messages received by the destination processes.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:
In collective communications, destination processes do not necessarily have information about the messages that they are to receive from source processes until the messages actually arrive. In all-to-all-v operations, for example, the processes in a group may not have any advance indication of their own as to which source processes are going to send them data in a given operation or how much data a given source process is going to send. This uncertainty can lead to bottlenecks and inefficiencies in handling the data at the destination processes.
In some applications, this uncertainty is alleviated by performing two collective operations in each round of communications: In the first operation, the processes exchange metadata to inform the destination processes how much data to expect, of what type, and from which source processes. This first operation can be carried out using all-to-all operation, for example. In the second operation, such as an all-to-all-v operation, the processes exchange the actual data. This two-stage model makes the programmer's job easier, but at the cost of increased communication load and latency.
Embodiments of the present invention that are described herein address the shortcomings of these existing models by enabling the processes in a group to exchange both metadata and data in a single collective operation. When a collective operation is invoked over the group of computing processes, the source processes in the group identify the data that they are going to transmit to respective destination processes, along with metadata indicating how the data are to be handled by each destination process. The source processes compose messages containing the metadata for transmission to the respective destination processes. Some of the messages may comprise only metadata, for example messages to destination nodes for which the source node has a large volume of data to transmit. Such messages enable the destination process to prepare an application buffer to receive the data before the actual transmission of the data. Other messages, however, comprise the actual data to be transmitted to a given destination processes, together with the metadata.
The source processes concurrently transmit these messages (including messages containing only metadata and messages containing both metadata and data) to the destination processes in the group over a communication medium. Upon receiving the messages, the destination processes use the metadata comprised in the messages that they have received in processing the data.
Some embodiments are directed particularly to implementing collective operations in which message sizes are not known in advance, such as all-to-all-v, all-to-all-w, all-gather-v, gather-v, and scatter-v. In such operations, the source process will incorporate the data together with the metadata in a given message when the size of the data for transmission from the source process to a given destination process is less than a predefined threshold. On the other hand, when the size of the data for transmission from the source process to a given destination process is greater than the predefined threshold, the source process will transmit only the metadata without the data in the message that it sends in the collective operation. The destination process will then use the metadata that it received in the message in retrieving the data from the source process in an additional step following the collective message exchange. For example, the destination process may use the metadata in transmitting a request to the source process, such as a remote direct memory access (RDMA) read request, to transmit the data to the destination process.
In some embodiments, message aggregation is used to enhance communication efficiency in handling small messages. In these embodiments, messages having respective sizes that are greater than a predefined threshold are transmitted from the source processes to the destination processes directly, without aggregation. Messages smaller than the predefined threshold, however, are aggregated by the source processes before transmission of the aggregated messages to the destination processes. Various aggregation algorithms may be used for this purpose. In one embodiment, a multi-step aggregation algorithm is used, in which data blocks are scattered and gathered among different processes at each step. Most data blocks that are aggregated are transmitted multiple times, through some are sent only once,
Although the present embodiments are described specifically with reference to the all-to-all-v operations, the principles of these embodiments may similarly be applied in accelerating other collective operations in which message sizes are not known in advance, as noted above. Furthermore, although these embodiments are framed in terms of MPI operations and protocols, the principles of the present invention may alternatively be implemented, mutatis mutandis, in conjunction with other protocols. All such alternative implementations are considered to be within the scope of the present invention.
Following certain computational stages in the distributed application, the program instructions invoke a collective operation, such as an all-to-all-v operation. In the context of this collective operation, system 20 defines an MPI communicator including all the participating processes 28, and each process has a respective rank within the communicator. In response to these instructions, each process 28 prepares data for transmission to all the other processes (ranks) within system 20, as well as metadata indicating how the data to be transmitted by the source processes in the collective operation are to be handled by destination processes that are to receive the data.
When the size of the data for transmission to a given destination is less than a certain threshold data size, the source process incorporates the data in a message 30 containing both the data and the metadata for transmission to the destination process. Messages 30 that are smaller than a predefined message aggregation threshold are aggregated and transmitted together to the respective destinations, typically via one or more intermediate destinations. This message aggregation can be carried out, for example, using techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 18/074,563, filed Dec. 5, 2022, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively or additionally, the message aggregation may take advantage of capabilities of NICs 24 in supporting collective operations, for example as described in the above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 10,521,283.
On the other hand, when the size of the data for transmission to a given destination process is greater than the threshold data size, the source process transmits a message 32 containing only the metadata to the respective destination process. The destination process uses the metadata in preparing a buffer in local memory to receive the data and in sending a request to the source process to transmit the data. Alternatively, message 32 may also contain a part of the data, in addition to the metadata.
Host computers 22 carry out the collective operations that are described herein, including particularly the present methods of selective data transmission and aggregation, under the control of software instructions. The software for these purposes may be downloaded to the host computers in electronic form, for example over network 26. Additionally or alternatively, the software may be stored on tangible, non-transitory computer-readable media, such as optical, magnetic, or electronic memory media.
In response to invocation of the collective operation, each of at least some of the processes in the group generates data for transmission to some or all of the other processes, at a data generation step 42. Typically, in any given collective operation, each process 28 can be both a source process for transmission of data and a destination process for receiving data. (When messages are aggregated, the destination processes also serve as intermediate destinations, which receive data in transit for aggregation and forwarding.) At step 42, the source processes also generate metadata that indicate how the data to be transmitted by the source processes in the collective operation are to be handled by the respective destination processes upon receiving the data. The metadata typically indicate the data size and may also provide information about the data type and/or the location of the data in a source buffer. In
Each source process J evaluates the size of each of the messages (J,K) that the source process has prepared, at an aggregation evaluation step 44. The size in this case refers to the combined size of the respective metadata and data that are to be transmitted to each destination process K. If this size is less than a predefined aggregation threshold, for example less than 500 bytes, the source process will not transmit the message directly to the destination process but will rather aggregate the message with messages from other source processes that are directed to the same destination process, at an aggregation step 46. Any suitable message aggregation algorithm may be used for this purpose, such as the algorithms described in the above-mentioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 18/074,563. Depending on the type and radix of the aggregation algorithm, the aggregating processes determine when aggregation of a given set of messages is complete, at an aggregation completion step 47. The aggregated messages, including data and metadata, are then transmitted to the destination processes, at an aggregated transmission step 48.
When the message (J,K) is larger than the aggregation threshold, the source process assesses whether the size of the data to be transmitted to destination process K is larger than a direct data transmission threshold, at a data evaluation step 50. If the data size is less than this threshold, the source process frames the data and metadata together in a single message and transmits the message to the destination process as part of the collective operation, at a combined transmission step 52.
When the size of the data destined for a given process K is found at step 50 to be larger than the direct data transmission threshold, the source process transmits only the metadata to process K as part of the collective operation, at a metadata transmission step 54. The source process then goes on to process the data for transmission to the next destination process K+1. After receiving the message sent at step 54, process K extracts the metadata from the message and uses the metadata in composing and transmitting a data request to the source process J, at a data request step 56. Upon receiving this request, the source process transmits the appropriate data to destination process K, at a data transmission step 58.
Source 60 transmits a combined message 68 containing data and metadata to destination 62. A routine in library 64 extracts the metadata from message 68, allocates a memory buffer 70 based on the metadata, and saves the incoming data in the buffer. Library 64 transfers data 72 from buffer 70 to a process memory 74 in user space 66, for input to the destination process, along with the data received from other source processes.
At step 54, source 60 transmits a message to destination 62 containing the metadata with respect to the data to be transferred. Destination 62 calls a library routine 80 to handle the data transfer based on the metadata. The library routine allocates a buffer in process memory 74 and transmits a data request to source 60 at step 56. For example, the data request may comprise an RDMA read request sent by NIC 24 (
Alternatively, destination 62 may use other protocols to request transfer of the data from source 60. For example, destination 62 may send a message to source 60 at step 56 indicating the address of the designated buffer in process memory 74, and requesting data transfer to this buffer. NIC 24 of source 60 can then direct an RDMA write request containing the data to the designated buffer. Other implementations will be apparent to those skilled in the art after reading the above description and are considered to be within the scope of the present invention.
It will thus be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 63/405,505, filed Sep. 12, 2022, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4933969 | Marshall et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5068877 | Near et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5325500 | Bell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5353412 | Douglas et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5404565 | Gould et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5408469 | Opher et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5606703 | Brady et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5944779 | Blum | Aug 1999 | A |
6041049 | Brady | Mar 2000 | A |
6115394 | Balachandran et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6212197 | Christensen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6370502 | Wu et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438137 | Turner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6483804 | Muller et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507562 | Kadansky et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6728862 | Wilson | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6816492 | Turner et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6857004 | Howard et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6937576 | Di Benedetto et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7102998 | Golestani | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7124180 | Ranous | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7164422 | Wholey, III et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171484 | Krause et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7224669 | Kagan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245627 | Goldenberg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7313582 | Bhanot et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7327693 | Rivers et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7336646 | Muller | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7346698 | Hannaway | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7555549 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7613774 | Caronni et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7636424 | Halikhedkar et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7636699 | Stanfill | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7676597 | Kagan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7738443 | Kumar | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760743 | Shokri et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8213315 | Crupnicoff et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8255475 | Kagan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8370675 | Kagan | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380880 | Gulley et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8510366 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8645663 | Kagan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8738891 | Karandikar et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8761189 | Shachar et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768898 | Trimmer et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8775698 | Archer et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8811417 | Bloch et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9110860 | Shahar | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9189447 | Faraj | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9294551 | Froese et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9344490 | Bloch et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9397960 | Arad et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9456060 | Pope et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9563426 | Bent et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9626329 | Howard | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9756154 | Jiang | Sep 2017 | B1 |
10015106 | Florissi et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10027601 | Narkis et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10158702 | Bloch et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10187400 | Castro et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10284383 | Bloch et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10296351 | Kohn et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10305980 | Gonzalez et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10318306 | Kohn et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10320508 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10425350 | Florissi | Sep 2019 | B1 |
10515045 | Mattina | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10521283 | Shuler et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10528518 | Graham et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10541938 | Timmerman et al. | Jan 2020 | B1 |
10547553 | Shattah et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10621489 | Appuswamy et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10727966 | Izenberg et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
11088971 | Brody et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11336383 | Mula et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11388263 | Levi et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
20020010844 | Noel et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020035625 | Tanaka | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020150094 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150106 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152315 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152327 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152328 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165897 | Kagan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030002483 | Zwack | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018828 | Craddock et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030061417 | Craddock et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065856 | Kagan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120835 | Kale et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040030745 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040062258 | Grow et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078493 | Blumrich et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040120331 | Rhine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123071 | Stefan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040174820 | Ricciulli | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040252685 | Kagan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260683 | Chan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050097300 | Gildea et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122329 | Janus | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129039 | Biran et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131865 | Jones et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050223118 | Tucker et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050281287 | Ninomi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060095610 | Arndt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060282838 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070127396 | Jain et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070127525 | Sarangam et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162236 | Lamblin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080040792 | Larson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080104218 | Liang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126564 | Wilkinson | May 2008 | A1 |
20080168471 | Benner et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181260 | Vonog et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192750 | Ko et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219159 | Chateau et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080244220 | Lin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263329 | Archer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288949 | Bohra et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298380 | Rittmeyer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307082 | Cai et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037377 | Archer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063816 | Arimilli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063817 | Arimilli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063891 | Arimilli et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090182814 | Tapolcai et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090240838 | Berg et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247241 | Gollnick et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292905 | Faraj | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296699 | Hefty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327444 | Archer et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017420 | Archer et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049836 | Kramer | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100074098 | Zeng et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100095086 | Eichenberger et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100185719 | Howard | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241828 | Yu et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274876 | Kagan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100329275 | Johnsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110060891 | Jia | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066649 | Berlyant et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093258 | Xu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110119673 | Bloch et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110173413 | Chen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110219208 | Asaad | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238956 | Arimilli et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110258245 | Blocksome et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276789 | Chambers et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120063436 | Thubert et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120117331 | Krause et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131309 | Johnson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120254110 | Takemoto | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130117548 | Grover et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130159410 | Lee et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159568 | Shahar et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130215904 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130250756 | Johri et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130312011 | Kumar et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318525 | Palanisamy et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336292 | Kore et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140019574 | Cardona et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033217 | Vajda et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040542 | Kim et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047341 | Breternitz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140095779 | Forsyth et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122831 | Uliel et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140136811 | Fleischer et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140189308 | Hughes et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211804 | Makikeni et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140258438 | Ayoub | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280420 | Khan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281370 | Khan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140362692 | Wu et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140365548 | Mortensen | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379714 | Hankins | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150046741 | Yen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055508 | Ashida et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150074373 | Sperber et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150106578 | Warfield et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150143076 | Khan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143077 | Khan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143078 | Khan et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143079 | Khan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143085 | Khan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143086 | Khan | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154058 | Miwa et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178211 | Hiramoto et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180785 | Annamraju | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188987 | Reed et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150193271 | Archer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150212972 | Boettcher et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150261720 | Kagan et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150269116 | Raikin et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150278347 | Meyer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150318015 | Bose et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347012 | Dewitt et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150365494 | Cardona et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379022 | Puig et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160055225 | Xu et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160092362 | Barron et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105494 | Reed et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112531 | Milton et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160117277 | Raindel et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119244 | Wang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160179537 | Kunzman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160219009 | French | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160246646 | Craciunas et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160248656 | Anand et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160283422 | Crupnicoff et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160294793 | Larson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160299872 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160342568 | Burchard et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160352598 | Reinhardt et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160364350 | Sanghi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170063613 | Bloch et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170093715 | McGhee et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170116154 | Palmer et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170187496 | Shalev et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187589 | Pope et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187629 | Shalev et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170187846 | Shalev et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170192782 | Valentine et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170199844 | Burchard et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170262517 | Horowitz et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170308329 | A et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170331926 | Raveh et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170344589 | Kafai et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180004530 | Vorbach | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180046901 | Xie et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180047099 | Bonig et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180089278 | Bhattacharjee et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180091442 | Chen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180097721 | Matsui et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180115529 | Munger et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180173673 | Daglis et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180262551 | Demeyer et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180278549 | Mula et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180285316 | Thorson et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180287928 | Levi et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180302324 | Kasuya | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180321912 | Li et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180321938 | Boswell et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349212 | Liu et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180367465 | Levi | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180375781 | Chen et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190018805 | Benisty | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190026250 | Das Sarma et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190044827 | Ganapathi | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190044875 | Murty | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190044889 | Serres et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190056972 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065208 | Liu et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068501 | Schneder et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190102179 | Fleming et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190102338 | Tang et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190102640 | Balasubramanian | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190114533 | Ng et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190121388 | Knowles et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190124524 | Gormley | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190138638 | Pal et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190141133 | Rajan et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190147092 | Pal et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190149486 | Bohrer et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190149488 | Bansal et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190171612 | Shahar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190235866 | Das Sarma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190278737 | Kozomora et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190303168 | Fleming, Jr. et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190303263 | Fleming, Jr. et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190319730 | Webb et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190324431 | Cella et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190339688 | Cella et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190347099 | Eapen et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190369994 | Parandeh Afshar et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190377580 | Vorbach | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190379714 | Levi et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200005859 | Chen et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200034145 | Bainville et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200057748 | Danilak | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200103894 | Cella et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200106828 | Elias et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200137013 | Jin et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200202246 | Lin et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200265043 | Graham et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200274733 | Graham et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20210203621 | Ylisirnio et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210218808 | Graham | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210234753 | Ben-Moshe et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210243140 | Levi et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210297151 | Levi et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20220006606 | Levi et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220029854 | Graham et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
20220188147 | Nudelman et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220201103 | Keppel | Jun 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2012216611 | Mar 2013 | AU |
Entry |
---|
Mellanox Technologies, “InfiniScale IV: 36-port 40GB/s Infiniband Switch Device”, pp. 1-2, year 2009. |
Mellanox Technologies Inc., “Scaling 10Gb/s Clustering at Wire-Speed”, pp. 1-8, year 2006. |
IEEE 802.1D Standard “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges”, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1-281, Jun. 9, 2004. |
IEEE 802.1AX Standard “IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Link Aggregation”, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1-163, Nov. 3, 2008. |
Turner et al., “Multirate Clos Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 1-11, Oct. 2003. |
Thayer School of Engineering, “An Slightly Edited Local Copy of Elements of Lectures 4 and 5”, Dartmouth College, pp. 1-5, Jan. 15, 1998 http://people.seas.harvard.edu/˜jones/cscie129/nu_lectures/lecture11/switching/clos_network/clos_network.html. |
“MPI: A Message-Passing Interface Standard,” Message Passing Interface Forum, version 3.1, pp. 1-868, Jun. 4, 2015. |
Coti et al., “MPI Applications on Grids: a Topology Aware Approach,” Proceedings of the 15th International European Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing (EuroPar'09), pp. 1-12, Aug. 2009. |
Petrini et al., “The Quadrics Network (QsNet): High-Performance Clustering Technology,” Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Symposium on Hot Interconnects (Hotl'01), pp. 1-6, Aug. 2001. |
Sancho et al., “Efficient Offloading of Collective Communications in Large-Scale Systems,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, pp. 1-10, Sep. 17-20, 2007. |
Priest et al., “You've Got Mail (YGM): Building Missing Asynchronous Communication Primitives”, IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops, pp. 221-230, year 2019. |
InfiniBand Architecture Specification, vol. 1, Release 1.2.1, pp. 1-1727, Nov. 2007. |
Deming, “Infiniband Architectural Overview”, Storage Developer Conference, pp. 1-70, year 2013. |
Fugger et al., “Reconciling fault-tolerant distributed computing and systems-on-chip”, Distributed Computing, vol. 24, Issue 6, pp. 323-355, Jan. 2012. |
Wikipedia, “System on a chip”, pp. 1-4, Jul. 6, 2018. |
Villavieja et al., “On-chip Distributed Shared Memory”, Computer Architecture Department, pp. 1-10, Feb. 3, 2011. |
Wikipedia, “Nagle's algorithm”, pp. 1-4, Dec. 12, 2019. |
Bruck et al., “Efficient Algorithms for All-to-All Communications in Multiport Message-Passing Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 8, No. 11, pp. 1143-1156, Nov. 1997. |
Gainaru et al., “Using InfiniBand Hardware Gather-Scatter Capabilities to Optimize MPI All-to-All”, EuroMPI '16, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp. 1-13, year 2016. |
Pjesivac-Grbovic et al., “Performance analysis of MPI collective operations”, Cluster Computing, pp. 1-25, 2007. |
Bruck et al., “Efficient Algorithms for All-to-All Communications in Multiport Message-Passing Systems”, Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures, pp. 298-309, Aug. 1, 1994. |
Chiang et al., “Toward supporting data parallel programming on clusters of symmetric multiprocessors”, Proceedings International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp. 607-614, Dec. 14, 1998. |
Danalis et al., “PTG: an abstraction for unhindered parallelism”, 2014 Fourth International Workshop on Domain-Specific Languages and High-Level Frameworks for High Performance Computing, pp. 1-10, Nov. 17, 2014. |
Cosnard et al., “Symbolic Scheduling of Parameterized Task Graphs on Parallel Machines,” Combinatorial Optimization book series (COOP, vol. 7), pp. 217-243, year 2000. |
Jeannot et al., “Automatic Multithreaded Parallel Program Generation for Message Passing Multiprocessors using paramerized Task Graphs”, World Scientific, pp. 1-8, Jul. 23, 2001. |
Stone, “An Efficient Parallel Algorithm for the Solution of a Tridiagonal Linear System of Equations,” Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 27-38, Jan. 1973. |
Kogge et al., “A Parallel Algorithm for the Efficient Solution of a General Class of Recurrence Equations,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-22, No. 8, pp. 786-793, Aug. 1973. |
Hoefler et al., “Message Progression in Parallel Computing—To Thread or not to Thread?”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, pp. 1-10, Tsukuba, Japan, Sep. 29-Oct. 1, 2008. |
Wikipedia, “Loop unrolling,” pp. 1-9, last edited Sep. 9, 2020 downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_unrolling. |
Chapman et al., “Introducing OpenSHMEM: SHMEM for the PGAS Community,” Proceedings of the Forth Conferene on Partitioned Global Address Space Programming Model, pp. 1-4, Oct. 2010. |
IEEE Standard 1588-2008, “IEEE Standard for a Precision Clock Synchronization Protocol for Networked Measurement and Control Systems”, pp. 1-289, year 2008. |
Weibel et al., “Implementation and Performance of Time Stamping Techniques”, 2004 Conference on IEEE 1588, bages 1-29, Sep. 28, 2004. |
InfiniBandTM Architecture Specification vol. 1, Release 1.2.1,pp. 1-1727, Nov. 2007. |
Lu et al., “A Fast CRC Update Implementation”, Computer Engineering Laboratory, Electrical Engineering Department, pp. 113-120, Oct. 8, 2003. |
Mellette et al., “Toward Optical Switching in the Data Center”, IEEE 19th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), pp. 1-6, Bucharest, Romania, Jun. 18-20, 2018. |
Bakopoulos et al., “NEPHELE: an end-to-end scalable and dynamically reconfigurable optical architecture for application-aware SDN cloud datacenters”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, issue 2, pp. 1-26, Feb. 2018. |
O-RAN Alliance, “O-RAN Fronthaul Working Group; Control, User and Synchronization Plane Specification”, ORAN-WG4.CUS.0-v01.00, Technical Specification, pp. 1-189, year 2019. |
Vattikonda et al., “Practical TDMA for Datacenter Ethernet”, EuroSys conference, Bern, Switzerland, pp. 225-238, Apr. 10-13, 2012. |
Ericsson AB et al., “Common Public Radio Interface: eCPRI Interface Specification”, V2.0, pp. 1-109, May 10, 2019. |
Xilinx Inc., “Radio over Ethernet Framer v2.1”, PB056 (v2.1), pp. 1-9, Oct. 30, 2019. |
Weibel, H., “High Precision Clock Synchronization according to IEEE 1588 Implementation and Performance Issues”, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, pp. 1-9, Jan. 17, 2005. |
Sanchez-Palencia, J., “[RFC,v3,net-next,00/18] Time based packet transmission”, pp. 1-14, Mar. 7, 2018. |
IEEE Std 802.1Qaz™, “IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks—Media Access Control (MAC) Bridges and Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks—Amendment 18: Enhanced Transmission Selection for Bandwidth Sharing Between Traffic Classes”, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1-110, Sep. 30, 2011. |
Crupnicoff et al., “Deploying Quality of Service and Congestion Control in InfiniBand-based Data Center Networks” White Paper, Mellanox Technologies Inc, Rev 1.0, pp. 1-19, Oct. 15, 2005. |
Mathey et al., “Scalable Deadlock-Free Deterministic Minimal-Path Routing Engine for InfiniBand-Based Dragonfly Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 183-197, Jan. 2018. |
Wikipedia, Precision Time Protocol, pp. 1-9, Apr. 20, 2020. |
SMPTE Standard, “Professional Media Over Managed IP Networks:Traffic Shaping and Delivery Timing for Video”, The Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, pp. 1-17, Nov. 22, 2017. |
Wikipedia, “Time-Sensitive Networking”, pp. 1-12, Mar. 5, 2020. |
Wikipedia, “Memory Protection,” pp. 1-6, last edited May 23, 2021. |
Mills, “Network Time Protocol (NTP),” RFC 0958, pp. 2-15, Sep. 1985. |
Mills, “Network Time Protocol (Version 1): Specification and Implementation,” RFC 1059, pp. 2-59, Jul. 1988. |
Mills, “Internet Time Synchronization: The Network Time Protocol,” IEEE Transactions on Communication, vol. 39, No. 10, pp. 1482-1493, Oct. 1991. |
Mills, “Network Time Protocol (Version 3): Specification, Implementation and Analysis,” RFC 1305, pp. 1-96, Mar. 1992. |
Graham, U.S. Appl. No. 18/074,563, filed Dec. 5, 2022. |
EP Application #22193554.6 Search Report dated Dec. 20, 2022. |
Nudelman et al., U.S. Appl. No. 18/071,692, filed Nov. 30, 2022. |
Xu et al., “SLOAVx: Scalable LOgarithmic AlltoallV Algorithm for Hierarchical Multicore Systems”, 13th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing, pp. 369-376, year 2013. |
Graham, U.S. Appl. No. 63/356,923, filed Jun. 29, 2022. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/495,824 Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2023. |
Yang et al., “SwitchAgg: A Further Step Toward In-Network Computing,” 2019 IEEE International Conference on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing & Communications, Social Computing & Networking, pp. 36-45, Dec. 2019. |
Pacheco, “A User's Guide to MPI,” Department of Mathematics, University of San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 1-51, Mar. 30, 1998. |
Wikipedia, “Message Passing Interface,” pp. 1-16, last edited Nov. 7, 2021, as downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_Passing_Interface. |
“Message Passing Interface (MPI): History and Evolution,” Virtual Workshop, Cornell University Center for Advanced Computing, NY, USA, pp. 1-2, year 2021, as downloaded from https://cvw.cac.cornell.edu/mpi/history. |
EP Application # 20156490.3 Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/495,824 Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/335,122 Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2023. |
U.S. Appl. No. 18/071,692 Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2023. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63405505 | Sep 2022 | US |