Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming and ultimately very expensive endeavors. In recognition of these expenses, added emphasis has been placed on efficiencies associated with well completions and maintenance over the life of the well. Along these lines, added emphasis has been placed on well logging, profiling and monitoring of conditions from the outset of well operations. Whether during interventional applications or at any point throughout the life of a well, detecting and monitoring well conditions has become a more sophisticated and critical part of well operations and maintenance.
Such access to the well is often provided by way of coiled tubing. Coiled tubing may be used to deliver interventional or monitoring tools downhole and it is particularly well suited for being driven downhole through a horizontal or tortuous well, to depths of perhaps several thousand feet, by an injector head at the surface of the oilfield. Thus, with these characteristics in mind, the coiled tubing will also generally be of sufficient strength and durability to withstand such applications.
In addition to providing access generally, coiled tubing may be utilized as a platform for carrying passive sensing capacity. For example, a fiber optic line may be run through the coiled tubing interior and utilized to acquire temperature and acoustic information from within the well. This is often referred to as providing, among other types of distributed measurements, distributed temperature sensing (DTS) and/or heterodyne distributed vibration sensing (hDVS) capacity. In this manner, the deployment of coiled tubing into the well for a given application may also result in providing such additional information in a relatively straight forward manner without any undue requirement for additional instrumentation or effort.
By the same token, given the capacity of the coiled tubing to carry a telemetric line, fiber optics may be utilized for sake of communication, for example, between oilfield equipment and a downhole application tool (e.g. at the bottom end of the coiled tubing). That is, while a more conventional electric cable may also be utilized for communications, there may be circumstances where a fiber optic line is preferred. For example, an electric cable capable of providing two-way communications between oilfield equipment and a downhole application tool may be of comparatively greater size, weight, and slower communication speeds as compared to a fiber optic telemetric line. This may not be of dramatic consequence when the application run is brief and/or the well is of comparatively shallower depths, say below about 10,000 feet. However, as wells of increasingly greater depths and deviation, such as beyond about 20,000 feet or so with a horizontal completion, become more and more common, the difference in time required to run the application as well as the weight of the extensive electrical cable may be quite significant. In some cases it may simply be impossible to use a coiled tubing unit equipped with electrical cable. The comparative greater size and weight of the electric cable may also further complicate installation and maintenance of the electric line as compared to fiber optics.
As alluded to above, utilizing a fiber optic line in place of an electric cable may increase communication or data transmission rates as well as reduce the weight of the overall deployed coiled tubing assembly. Once more, a fiber optic line may be more durable than the electric cable in certain respects. For example, where the application to be carried out downhole involves acid injection for sake of cleaning out a downhole location, acid will be pumped through the coiled tubing coming into contact with the telemetric line therethrough. In such circumstances, the line may be more resistant to acid where fiber optics are utilized for the telemetry, given the greater susceptibility of electric lines to damage upon acid exposure due to manner of construction.
In spite of the variety of advantages, utilizing a fiber optic line to provide telemetry through the coiled tubing in lieu of an electric line does present certain challenges. For example, given the more common deeper wells of today, it is likely that the fiber optic line would be of an extensive length and require a heat resistant capacity. Indeed, high temperature fiber optic lines are available which are rated for use at over 150° C. However, such fiber optic lines are substantially more expensive on a per foot basis. Once more, with well depths commonly exceeding 20,000 feet and susceptible to extreme temperatures, this means that the line cost is likely to be very expensive. By way of example, in today's dollars it would not be uncommon to see a 22,000 foot fiber optic line with two-way communications approach about $250,000 in cost. Adding to the cost is the fact that with multiple threads, the risk of introducing a defect to the line is increased with every thread that is added to the line. A single defect in a single thread may render the entire line to be of no value. Additionally, fiber optic threads, regardless of type tend to deteriorate over time and use and generally will require replacement before other equipment parts.
In an effort to reduce the cost of a fiber optic line through a coiled tubing as described above, it is feasible to eliminate certain threads of the line. That is, a conventional two-way fiber optic line would include multiple fiber optic threads. Specifically, one or more threads may provide a downlink for data from the oilfield surface, for example to command one or more downhole tools, whereas one or more threads would provide an uplink for data back to the surface from the one or more tools. Thus in theory, for two-way fiber optic communication, the total threads may be reduced to a total of no more than two (e.g. one dedicated for downlink and the other for uplink).
While some cost reduction might be seen in reducing the number of fiber optic threads perhaps by as much as $60,000 per thread eliminated in the 22,000 foot example, the ability to reduce the line down to a single fiber may not be a practical undertaking at present. For example, it might be feasible to utilize the dedicated thread for uplink communications from the tool and send downlink commands through another mode such as pressure pulse actuation. However, this would result in a downlink signal that might be of poorer quality and require its own dedicated surface controls, therefore driving up equipment cost. Thus, as a practical matter, coiled tubing operators are generally left with the option of either more expensive fiber optic communications or less desirable electric communications.
A system for use with a well is disclosed. The system utilizes surface equipment positioned at an oilfield adjacent the well. A downhole device is positioned in the well with a fiber optic thread coupled to each of the surface equipment and the downhole device. The thread is further configured to accommodate first and second fiber optic transmissions to one of the equipment and the device. Further, these transmissions are different types of fiber optic transmissions.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present disclosure. This includes description of the surrounding environment in which embodiments detailed herein may be utilized. In addition to the particular surrounding environment detail provided herein, that of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,515,774 and 7,929,812, each for Methods and Apparatus for Single Fiber Optical Telemetry may be referenced as well as U.S. application Ser. No. 14/873,083 for an Optical Rotary Joint in Coiled Tubing Applications, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Additionally, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described may be practiced without these and other particular details. Further, numerous variations or modifications may be employed which remain contemplated by the embodiments as specifically described.
Embodiments are described with reference to certain tools and applications run in a well over coiled tubing. The embodiments are described with reference to a particular cleanout applications utilizing acid and a cleanout tool at the end of a coiled tubing line. However, a variety of other applications may take advantage of well system embodiments as detailed herein. For example, permanent completions, alternate conveyances such as slickline and wireline cables and even cables for downhole electrical submersible pumps. Indeed, so long as the system includes surface and/or downhole assemblies with a fiber optic thread therebetween which accommodates multiple types of fiber optic transmissions, appreciable benefit may be realized.
Referring specifically now to
The different types of transmissions 115, 125, 135, 145, 155, 165 which may be accommodated by the fiber optic thread 190 may include digital transmissions 115, analog transmissions 125, optical power transmissions 135, wavelength shifting transmissions 145, phase changing transmissions 155 and/or distributed measurement transmissions 165, to name a few. Regardless, utilizing different types of optical transmissions 115, 125, 135, 145, 155, 165 provides an added degree of capacity or flexibility for the system 100. For example, as detailed below, two-way communications over the single thread 190 may be enhanced by using different wavelengths for downlink transmissions 140 than that used for uplink transmissions 160. By the same token, regardless of downlink 140 or uplink 160 status, the number of different transmissions that may be sent over the thread 190 simultaneously, even in the same direction, may be increased by the number of different optical transmissions types 115, 125, 135, 145, 155, 165 available.
As used herein, the term different “transmission types” is not meant to infer that any non-optical transmissions are taking place. These transmissions 115, 125, 135, 145, 155, 165 are all optical in nature over a fiber optic thread 190. However, the manner in which these transmissions 115, 125, 135, 145, 155, 165 are emitted and/or dealt with at each end of the thread 190 may be different from one transmission type to another. That is, as described below, a distributed measurement tool of surface equipment 150 may be tailored to monitor backscattered bursts of light. Thus, a dedicated channel of detection for distributed measurement transmissions 165 is provided. On the other hand, a digital transceiver of the surface equipment 150 may be tuned to a specific range of wavelengths as a channel for instructing a downhole tool or obtaining well information (e.g. via digital transmission 115). Digital transmissions 115 may be well suited for such binary communications. Of course, both transmissions 115, 165 are fiber optic. However, due to the different types of devices transmitting and receiving the information, different dedicated channels are available. As a result, the system 100 supports independent information streams that may enable hardware, software and firmware to operate independently without requiring costly development of overall inter-operability in design.
Continuing with reference to
Of course, distributed temperature information may be acquired from backscatter methods or techniques applied to the fiber optic thread 190 over its length as opposed to emerging from a single downhole location (e.g. the downhole device 180). The acquired data at the surface equipment may provide strain, vibration and other information in addition to temperature. Regardless of the information and origin, the distributed measurement transmission 165 is ultimately managed by a distributed measurement tool of the surface equipment that is dedicated to this transmission channel.
Referring now to
With added reference to
As with the surface components, separate downhole fiber optic passages 215, 219 emerge from downhole features, for example in communication with a downhole tool 275 of the device 180 of
Continuing with reference to
Referring more specifically now to
Continuing with reference to
Each coupler 201, 210 may be equipped with a common fitting 230, 270 for securing the single thread 190. Further, the uphole coupler 201 includes a dedicated downlink passage 205 coupled to the light transmitter 229 and a dedicated uplink passage 209 coupled to the receiver 227. Similarly, the downhole coupler 210 includes a dedicated downlink passage 215 coupled to a receiver 277 and a dedicated uplink passage 219 coupled to a fiber optic transmitter 279. Ultimately, this means that downlink fiber optic light 140 may pass from the uphole fiber optic light transmitter 229 and into the shared fiber optic thread 190 eventually emerging at the downhole receiver 277 via the couplers 201, 210. As noted, the thread 190 is shared for two-way communications as described further below. Thus, uplink fiber optic light 160 may simultaneously be transmitted from the downhole fiber optic light transmitter 279 and into the thread 190 eventually emerging at the uphole receiver 227 via the couplers 201, 210. As a practical matter, this means that a surface assembly 225 of the surface equipment 150 may send data to a downhole tool 275 and the tool 275 may send data back to the assembly 225 over the very same fiber optic thread 190, simultaneously.
Keep in mind that for embodiments herein, there may be a host of different surface assemblies at the surface equipment 150. Similarly, there may be a variety of different tools at the downhole device 180. Thus, for the embodiment depicted in
The above described couplers 201, 210 allow for the passage of fiber optic light 140, 160 in both directions over the thread 190 at the same time. For example, the passage 205, 215 supporting downlink light 140 need not be structurally maintained separate and apart from the passages 209, 219 supporting uplink light 160 throughout the entire length of the system 100. Instead, within the uphole coupler 101, the uphole passages 205, 215 may be brought to interface with one another and physically merge with the single fiber optic thread 190. Similarly, within the downhole coupler 210, the downhole passages 215, 219 may also be brought into physical interface with one another and merge with the same thread 190 at the downhole end thereof.
Unlike electrical current, or other forms of data transfer, merging the optical pathways of both the downlink light 140 and uplink light 160 into the same shared thread 190 does not present an interference issue. That is, the two different lights 140, 160, each headed in the opposite directions do not impede one another. Of course, the same would be true for different light types headed in the same direction as detailed further below.
Other measures may be taken to ensure that the downlink light 140 reaches the downhole receiver 277 and the uplink light 160 reaches the uphole receiver 227. As suggested above, these measures may include tuning the receivers 227, 277 to particular wavelengths of light detection or outfitting each receiver 227, 277 with filters to substantially eliminate the detection of unintended light or both. For example, in one embodiment, where distributed measurements are involved, the downlink light 140 may be emitted by the uphole transmitter 229 at 1550 nm of wavelength whereas the uplink light 160 may be emitted by the downhole transmitter 279 at a 1310 nm wavelength. In this case, the transmitters 229, 279 may be conventional laser diodes suitable for emitting such wavelengths. Regardless, even if 1550 nm light 140 from the uphole transmitter 229 reflects back toward the uphole receiver 227, detection thereof may be substantially avoided due to tuning of the receiver 227 to receive 1310 nm light and filter out 1550 nm light. Alternatively, one or more optical filters may be used to minimize the amount of reflected light that reaches the receiver.
Even the use of wavelengths that are 200 or more nm apart in wavelength may further aid in avoiding such crosstalk detections by the receiver 229. Indeed, in one embodiment, the wavelengths may be even further separated, for example with the uplink light 160 being 810 nm in contrast to the downlink light 140 of 1550 nm (or vice versa). Of course, in this same embodiment, the downhole receiver 177 is afforded the same type of tuning and/or filtering to help ensure proper detection of 1550 nm light 140 to the substantial exclusion of 1310 nm light.
Continuing with reference to
With added reference to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Because of the movement of the reel 440 of
Referring now to
Both of the noted two-way communications and the differing transmission types may take place over a single fiber optic thread 190 of minimal profile. Thus, clearance within a flow path of the coiled tubing 410 may be sufficient for fluid flow capable of maintaining integrity of the coiled tubing 410 as well as delivering fluid for the cleanout of the indicated debris 599 or for other wellbore applications, such as wellbore stimulation applications, requiring the delivery of fluid along the flow path of the coiled tubing 410, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art. Additionally, in such an embodiment, the fiber optic nature of communications may be less susceptible to damage where the cleanout fluid is of an acid nature.
As shown in
With added reference to
While an exemplary coiled tubing application is illustrated at
Referring now to
Of course, transmissions of different types may not necessarily be sequential in a given direction. For example, one type of transmission may be sent into the well as indicated at 630 followed by the running of an application as noted at 660. This may be followed by another transmission of another type directed at the surface equipment as indicated at 675. This, in turn may be followed by yet another type of transmission directed at the surface equipment (see 690) or not (see the bypass from 675 to 615). Regardless, so long as multiple transmission types may be accommodated over the single fiber optic thread, appreciable benefit may be realized. This may include sequential or simultaneous transmission types in one or both directions.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. Regardless, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.
This Patent Document is a Continuation-In-Part claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 15/008,172, entitled “Fiber Optic Coiled Tubing Telemetry Assembly”, filed Jan. 27, 2016, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15008172 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 15816180 | US |