Patent Grant
10852060
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Typical gas processing options for high British thermal unit (Btu) gas (i.e. natural gas having a relatively high energy content) include cryogenic processing and refrigeration plants (e.g., a Joule-Thomson (JT) plant, a refrigerated JT plant, or a refrigeration only plant). Cryogenic processes generally comprise a refrigeration step to liquefy some or all of the gas stream followed by a multi-stage separation to remove methane from the liquid products. This process can capture very high (50-95%) ethane percentages, high propane percentages (98-99%), and essentially all (e.g., 100%) of the heavier components. The residual gas from the process will typically have a Btu content meeting a natural gas pipeline specification (e.g. a Btu content of less than about 1,100 Btu/ft3). The liquid product from a cryogenic process can have a high vapor pressure that precludes the liquid from being a truckable product (e.g., a vapor pressure of greater than 250 pounds per square inch gauge (psig)). When a truckable product is required, the liquid product from the cryogenic plant will have to be “de-ethanized” prior to trucking by passing the liquid product through another separation step, and at least some of the ethane can be blended back into the residual gas stream. Cryogenic processes face several constraints and limitations including high capital and operating costs, a high ethane recovery in the liquid product that may make the liquid unmarketable in certain areas, and the requirement for a pipeline to be located nearby.
Refrigeration plants are typically reserved for smaller volumes or stranded assets not near a pipeline. This process generally comprises cooling the inlet gas stream using the JT effect and/or refrigeration followed by a single stage separation. These plants have a lower cost than cryogenic plants, but capture only 30-40% of propane, 80-90% of butanes, and close to 100% of the heavier components. Due to the reduced quantity of light components (e.g., methane and ethane), the liquid product is truckable. However, the lower propane recovery may result in the loss of potentially valuable product and a residual gas product with a high energy content, which can cause the residual gas to exceed the upper limit on the pipeline gas energy content. The reduced propane recovery can also prevent the residual gas from meeting the hydrocarbon dewpoint criteria as set by pipeline operators in certain markets. Additional propane can be recovered from refrigeration plants by increasing the refrigeration duty and/or the pressure drop through the plant, but because the process comprises a single stage, it also causes an increased ethane recovery, which raises the vapor pressure of the liquid product.
In many places, gas is produced that cannot be processed economically under either of the options presented above. The produced gas may have a range of compositions with an energy content ranging from about 1,050 to about 1,700 Btu/ft3 or higher, and may have a nitrogen and/or contaminate (e.g., CO2, H2S, etc.) contents in excess of pipeline specifications. The gas may require a truckable liquid product due to the lack of a natural gas liquids (NGL) pipeline in the vicinity, and the residual gas product can require a high level of propane recovery to meet the energy content specifications of a gas pipeline. Further, the gas may be produced in insufficient quantities to justify the expense of a cryogenic plant.
In one aspect, the disclosure includes a process comprising separating a hydrocarbon feed stream into a natural gas-rich stream and a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)-rich stream using process equipment comprising only one multi-stage separation column, wherein the natural gas-rich stream has an energy content of less than or equal to about 1,300 Btu/ft3, and wherein the LPG-rich stream has a vapor pressure less than or equal to about 350 psig.
In another aspect, the disclosure includes a process comprising separating a hydrocarbon feed stream into a top effluent stream and a LPG-rich stream, and subsequently expanding the top effluent stream to produce a natural gas-rich stream.
In another aspect, the disclosure includes an apparatus comprising a multi-stage separation column configured to separate a hydrocarbon feed stream into a natural gas-rich stream and a LPG-rich stream, wherein the natural gas-rich stream has an energy content of less than or equal to about 1,300 Btu/ft3, wherein the LPG-rich stream has a vapor pressure less than or equal to about 350 psig, and wherein the multi-stage separation column is the only multi-stage separation column in the apparatus.
In yet another aspect, the disclosure includes an apparatus comprising a multi-stage separation column configured to separate a hydrocarbon feed stream into a top effluent stream and a LPG-rich stream, and an expander configured to expand the top effluent stream and produce a natural gas-rich stream.
These and other features will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and claims.
For a more complete understanding of this disclosure, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts.
It should be understood at the outset that although an illustrative implementation of one or more embodiments are provided below, the disclosed systems and/or methods may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or in existence. The disclosure should in no way be limited to the illustrative implementations, drawings, and techniques illustrated below, including the exemplary designs and implementations illustrated and described herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
Disclosed herein is a process and associated process equipment for a gas separation process that may use a single multi-stage column and a partial condensation of the column overhead to produce vapor and liquid portions. The liquid portion may be used as column reflux, while the vapor portion may be expanded and used to cool the column overhead and/or hydrocarbon feed stream. The present process provides a truckable NGL product along with a natural gas product that can be transported through a natural gas pipeline.
The mixed stream may undergo a separation step 50 to produce a liquid portion stream and a vapor portion stream. The liquid portion stream may be recycled to the separation process 30 as reflux. The vapor portion stream formed by the separation process 50 may be cooled by an expansion process 60 (e.g., using a JT expander or an expansion turbine). The expanded overhead stream may undergo further temperature and/or pressure adjustments 70 to create a natural gas-rich stream suitable for entry into a pipeline. Temperature and/or pressure adjustment 70 may comprise any known hydrocarbon temperature and/or pressure adjustment process. For example, the overhead stream may be heated, cooled, compressed, throttled, expanded or combinations thereof. The overhead stream may be cross-exchanged with other streams in the single-unit gas separation process 10 to exchange heat between the streams.
Returning to the separator 107, the vapor portion stream 212 may be fed into an expander 113, specifically a JT expander, to reduce the temperature and/or pressure of the vapor portion stream 212. The expanded overhead stream 213 may pass through the heat exchanger 106 to increase the temperature of the expanded overhead stream 213 and/or to decrease the temperature of top effluent stream 208. The overhead stream 214 may then be passed through the heat exchanger 101 to further increase the temperature of the overhead stream 214 and/or to cool the hydrocarbon feed stream 201. The residue stream 216 may be passed through a compressor 110 receiving energy 305 to increase the pressure and/or temperature in the residue stream 216 creating the pressurized residue stream 217. The pressurized residue stream 217 may be passed through a heat exchanger 111 to cool the pressurized residue stream 217 creating the cooled pressurized residue stream 218. The cooled pressurized residue stream 218 may be passed through a compressor 112 receiving energy 304 to increase the pressure and/or temperature in the cooled pressurized residue stream 218 to create a natural gas-rich stream 219.
The hydrocarbon feed stream may contain a mixture of hydrocarbons and other compounds. Numerous types of hydrocarbons may be present in the hydrocarbon feed stream, including methane, ethane, propane, i-butane, n-butane, i-pentane, n-pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, and other hydrocarbons. Other compounds may be present in the hydrocarbon feed stream, including nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water, helium, hydrogen sulfide, other acid gases, and/or impurities. The hydrocarbon feed stream may be in any state including a liquid state, a vapor state, or a combination of liquid and vapor states. In an embodiment, the hydrocarbon feed stream may be substantially similar in composition to the hydrocarbons in the subterranean formation, e.g. the hydrocarbons may not be processed prior to entering the gas separation process described herein. Alternatively, the hydrocarbon feed stream may be sweetened, but is not otherwise refined or separated.
The composition of the hydrocarbon feed stream may differ from location to location. In embodiments, the hydrocarbon feed stream comprises from about 45 percent to about 99 percent, from about 60 percent to about 90 percent, or from about 70 percent to about 80 percent methane. Additionally or alternatively, the hydrocarbon feed stream may comprise from about 1 percent to about 25 percent, from about 2 percent to about 18 percent, or from about 4 percent to about 12 percent ethane. Additionally or alternatively, the hydrocarbon feed stream may comprise from about 1 percent to about 25 percent, from about 2 percent to about 20 percent, or from about 3 percent to about 9 percent propane. In embodiments, the hydrocarbon feed stream may have an energy content of less than or equal to about 2,000 Btu/ft3, from about 900 Btu/ft3 to about 1,800 Btu/ft3, or from about 1,100 Btu/ft3 to about 1,600 Btu/ft3. Unless otherwise stated, the percentages herein are provided on a mole basis.
The LPG-rich stream may contain a mixture of hydrocarbons and other compounds. Numerous types of hydrocarbons may be present in the LPG-rich stream, including methane, ethane, propane, i-butane, n-butane, i-pentane, n-pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, and other hydrocarbons. Other compounds may be present in the LPG-rich stream, including nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water, helium, hydrogen sulfide, other acid gases, and/or other impurities. Specifically, the LPG-rich stream comprises less than or equal to about 6 percent, less than or equal to about 4 percent, less than or equal to about 2 percent, or is substantially free of methane. Additionally or alternatively, the LPG-rich stream may comprise from about 8 percent to about 35 percent, from about 10 percent to about 28 percent, or from about 15 percent to about 25 percent ethane. Additionally or alternatively, the LPG-rich stream may comprise from about 10 percent to about 60 percent, from about 20 percent to about 50 percent, or from about 24 percent to about 33 percent propane. In embodiments, the LPG-rich stream may have a vapor pressure less than or equal to about 600 psig, less than or equal to about 250 psig, or less than or equal to about 200 psig, which may be determined according to ASTM-D-323.
In embodiments, the LPG-rich stream may contain an increased propane concentration and a decreased methane concentration compared to the hydrocarbon feed stream. In embodiments, the LPG-rich stream may comprise less than or equal to about 15 percent, less than or equal to about 7 percent, or less than or equal to about 3 percent of the methane in the hydrocarbon feed stream. Additionally or alternatively, the LPG-rich stream may comprise from about 10 percent to about 55 percent, from about 20 percent to about 53 percent, or from about 40 percent to about 50 percent of the ethane in the hydrocarbon feed stream. Additionally or alternatively, the LPG-rich stream may comprise greater than or equal to about 40 percent, greater than or equal to about 60 percent, or greater than or equal to about 85 percent of the propane in the hydrocarbon feed stream.
The natural gas-rich stream may contain a mixture of hydrocarbons and other compounds. Numerous types of hydrocarbons may be present in the natural gas-rich stream, including methane, ethane, propane, i-butane, n-butane, i-pentane, n-pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, and other hydrocarbons. Other compounds may be present in the natural gas-rich stream, including nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water, helium, hydrogen sulfide, other acid gases, and/or other impurities. Specifically, the natural gas-rich stream comprises greater than or equal to about 65 percent, from about 75 percent to about 99 percent, or from about 85 percent to about 95 percent methane. Additionally or alternatively, the natural gas-rich stream may comprise less than about 30 percent, from about 1 percent to about 20 percent, or from about 2 percent to about 8 percent ethane. Additionally or alternatively, the natural gas-rich stream may be less than about 1 percent or be substantially free of propane. In embodiments, the natural gas-rich stream may have an energy content of less than or equal to about 1,300 Btu/ft3, from about 900 Btu/ft3 to about 1,200 Btu/ft3, from about 950 Btu/ft3 to about 1,150 Btu/ft3, or from about 1,000 Btu/ft3 to about 1,100 Btu/ft3.
In embodiments, the natural gas-rich stream may contain an increased methane concentration and a decreased propane concentration compared to the hydrocarbon feed stream 201. In embodiments, the natural gas-rich stream may contain greater than or equal to about 85 percent, greater than or equal to about 93 percent, or greater than or equal to about 97 percent of the methane in the hydrocarbon feed stream. Additionally or alternatively, the natural gas-rich stream may comprise from about 45 percent to about 90 percent, from about 47 percent to about 80 percent, or from about 50 percent to about 60 percent of the ethane in the hydrocarbon feed stream. Additionally or alternatively, the natural gas-rich stream may comprise less than or equal to about 60 percent, less than or equal to about 40 percent, or less than or equal to about 15 percent of the propane in the hydrocarbon feed stream.
The separators described herein may be any of a variety of process equipment suitable for separating a stream into two separate streams having different compositions, states, temperatures, and/or pressures. At least one of the separators may be a multi-stage separation column, in which the separation process occurs at multiple stages having unique temperature and pressure gradients. A multi-stage separation column may be a column having trays, packing, or some other type of complex internal structure. Examples of such columns include scrubbers, strippers, absorbers, adsorbers, packed columns, and distillation columns having valve, sieve, or other types of trays. Such columns may employ weirs, downspouts, internal baffles, temperature, and/or pressure control elements. Such columns may also employ some combination of reflux condensers and/or reboilers, including intermediate stage condensers and reboilers. Additionally or alternatively, one or more of the separators may be a single stage separation column such as a phase separator. A phase separator is a vessel that separates an inlet stream into a substantially vapor stream and a substantially liquid stream without a substantial change between the state of the feed entering the vessel and the state of the fluids inside the vessel. Such vessels may have some internal baffles, temperature, and/or pressure control elements, but generally lack any trays or other type of complex internal structure commonly found in columns. For example, the phase separator may be a knockout drum or a flash drum. Finally, one or more of the separators may be any other type of separator, such as a membrane separator.
The expanders described herein may be any of a variety of process equipment capable of cooling a gas stream. For example, the expanders may be a JT expander, e.g. any device that cools a stream primarily using the JT effect, such as throttling devices, throttling valves, or a porous plug. Alternatively, the expanders may be expansion turbines. Generally, expansion turbines, also called turboexpanders, include a centrifugal or axial flow turbine connected to a drive a compressor or an electric generator. The types of expansion turbines suitable include turboexpanders, centrifugal or axial flow turbines.
The heat exchangers described herein may be any of a variety of process equipment suitable for heating or cooling any of the streams described herein. Generally, heat exchangers are relatively simple devices that allow heat to be exchanged between two fluids without the fluids directly contacting each other. In the case of an air cooler, one of the fluids is atmospheric air, which may be forced over tubes or coils using one or more fans. The types of heat exchangers suitable for the gas separation process include shell and tube, kettle-type, air-cooled, bayonet, plate-fin, and spiral heat exchangers.
The mechanical refrigeration unit described herein may be any of a variety of process equipment comprising a suitable refrigeration process. The refrigeration fluid that circulates in the mechanical refrigeration unit may be any suitable refrigeration fluid, such as methane, ethane, propane, FREON, or combinations thereof.
The reboiler described herein may be any of a variety of process equipment suitable for changing the temperature and or separating any of the streams described herein. In embodiments, the reboiler may be any vessel that separates an inlet stream into a substantially vapor stream and a substantially liquid stream. These vessels typically have some internal baffles, temperature, and/or pressure control elements, but generally lack any trays or other type of complex internal structure found in other vessels. In specific embodiments, heat exchangers and kettle-type reboilers may be used as the reboilers described herein.
The compressors described herein may be any of a variety of process equipment suitable for increasing the pressure, temperature, and/or density of any of the streams described herein. Generally, compressors are associated with vapor streams; however, such a limitation should not be read into the present processes as the compressors described herein may be interchangeable with pumps based upon the specific conditions and compositions of the streams. The types of compressors and pumps suitable for the uses described herein include centrifugal, axial, positive displacement, rotary and reciprocating compressors and pumps. Finally, the gas separation processes described herein may contain additional compressors and/or pumps other than those described herein.
The pump described herein may be any of a variety of process equipment suitable for increasing the pressure, temperature, and/or density of any of the streams described herein. The types of pumps suitable for the uses described herein include centrifugal, axial, positive displacement, rotary, and reciprocating pumps. Finally, the gas separation processes described herein may contain additional pumps other than those described herein.
The energy streams described herein may be derived from any number of suitable sources. For example, heat may be added to a process stream using steam, turbine exhaust, or some other hot fluid and a heat exchanger. Similarly, heat may be removed from a process stream by using a refrigerant, air, or some other cold fluid and a heat exchanger. Further, electrical energy can be supplied to compressors, pumps, and other mechanical equipment to increase the pressure or other physical properties of a fluid. Similarly, turbines, generators, or other mechanical equipment can be used to extract physical energy from a stream and optionally convert the physical energy into electrical energy. Persons of ordinary skill in the art are aware of how to configure the processes described herein with the required energy streams. In addition, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the gas separation processes described herein may contain additional equipment, process streams, and/or energy streams other than those described herein.
The gas separation process having an expanded, post-separation vent stream described herein has many advantages. One advantage is the use of only one multi-stage separator column. This is an advantage because it reduces the capital costs of building and operating the process. A second advantage is the process produces both a truckable LPG-rich stream and a pipeline suitable natural gas-rich stream. When combined with heat integration, the process may be able to recover a high percentage (e.g., about 85 to about 98%) of the propane in the LPG-rich stream while rejecting enough ethane to make a truckable product (e.g., a vapor pressure less than about 350 psig) as well as meet pipeline specifications on the natural gas-rich stream (e.g., a heat content of less than about 1,100 Btu/ft3, a dew point specification, etc.).
In one example, a process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 100 shown in
A second process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 100 shown in
In another example, a process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 150 shown in
A second process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 150 shown in
In another example, a process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 160 shown in
A second process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 160 shown in
In another example, a process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 170 shown in
A second process simulation was performed using the single-unit gas separation process 170 shown in
At least one embodiment is disclosed and variations, combinations, and/or modifications of the embodiment(s) and/or features of the embodiment(s) made by a person having ordinary skill in the art are within the scope of the disclosure. Alternative embodiments that result from combining, integrating, and/or omitting features of the embodiment(s) are also within the scope of the disclosure. Where numerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such express ranges or limitations should be understood to include iterative ranges or limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly stated ranges or limitations (e.g., from about 1 to about 10 includes, 2, 3, 4, etc.; greater than 0.10 includes 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, etc.). For example, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, Rl, and an upper limit, Ru, is disclosed, any number falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, the following numbers within the range are specifically disclosed: R=Rl+k*(Ru−Rl), wherein k is a variable ranging from 1 percent to 100 percent with a 1 percent increment, i.e., k is 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent, 5 percent, . . . 50 percent, 51 percent, 52 percent, . . . , 95 percent, 96 percent, 97 percent, 98 percent, 99 percent, or 100 percent. All percentages used herein are weight percentages unless otherwise indicated. Moreover, any numerical range defined by two R numbers as defined in the above is also specifically disclosed. Use of broader terms such as comprises, includes, and having should be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as consisting of, consisting essentially of, and comprised substantially of. All documents described herein are incorporated herein by reference.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/473,315, filed Apr. 8, 2011 by Eric Prim, and entitled “Single-Unit Gas Separation Process Having Expanded, Post-Separation Vent Stream”, which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3367122 | Tutton | Feb 1968 | A |
| 4022597 | Bacon | May 1977 | A |
| 4128410 | Bacon | Dec 1978 | A |
| 4171964 | Campbell | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4251249 | Gulsby | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4846863 | Tomilson et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4854955 | Campbell | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4951503 | Fini | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5030339 | Czarnecki | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5275005 | Campbell et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5291736 | Paradowski | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5309720 | Johnson | May 1994 | A |
| 5435436 | Manley et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5771712 | Campbell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5772733 | Lokhandwala et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5799507 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5881569 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5960644 | Nagelvoort | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5983664 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6112549 | Yao et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6182469 | Campbell et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6401486 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6712880 | Foglietta et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 7041156 | Bras et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 20020065446 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166336 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20040079107 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040187686 | Amin | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050092594 | Parro et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20060032269 | Cuellar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20070012071 | Huang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070012072 | Qualls et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125122 | Mak et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080098770 | Ransbarger | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115529 | Ransbarger et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115530 | Mock et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080190136 | Pitman et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256976 | Eaton | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080264100 | Mak | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282731 | Cuellar et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090100862 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090188279 | Bras et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090277217 | Ransbarger et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100011663 | Coyle | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100011809 | Mak | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100018248 | Fieler | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100031700 | Wilkinson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20110011127 | Evans et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110041550 | Menzel | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110120183 | Wilkinson et al. | May 2011 | A9 |
| 20150007981 | Shomody et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150153101 | Gahier et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2448884 | Dec 2002 | CA |
| 2605862 | Apr 2008 | CA |
| 2805272 | Jan 2012 | CA |
| 3639555 | May 1988 | DE |
| 1008823 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 2415201 | Dec 2005 | GB |
| 2462555 | Nov 2009 | GB |
| 0025061 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 02101307 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 2010017061 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2770658, Canadian Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2770658, Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2014, 2 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2770658, Canadian Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2015227466, Canadian Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2016, 4 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2012201166, Australian Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2015, 4 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2012201166, Australian Notice of Acceptance dated Oct. 19, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2770658, Canadian Office Action dated Jan. 15, 2015, 3 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Canadian Application No. 2770658, Canadian Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 25, 2016, 1 page. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2015227466, Australian Notice of Acceptance dated Sep. 19, 2016, 2 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/021022, PCT International Search Report dated Nov. 7, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/021022, PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Nov. 7, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/021022, PCT Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority dated Apr. 12, 2018, 8 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273821, Australian Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2018, 2 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273826, Australian Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2018, 3 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273827, Australian Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2018, 3 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273833, Australian Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2018, 3 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273821, Australian Notice of Acceptance dated May 16, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273826, Australian Notice of Acceptance dated May 23, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273827, Australian Notice of Acceptance dated Jun. 7, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Foreign Communication From a Counterpart Application, Australian Application No. 2016273833, Australian Notice of Acceptance dated Jun. 7, 2019, 3 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120255325 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61473315 | Apr 2011 | US |
