Traditionally, fluids such as biological materials have been processed in systems that utilize stainless steel containers or vessels. These containers are sterilized after use so that they can be reused. The sterilization procedures are expensive and cumbersome, as well as being ineffectual at times. In order to provide greater flexibility in manufacturing and reduce the time needed to effect a valid regeneration of the equipment, manufacturers have begun to utilize disposable sterilized containers and/or bioreactors such as collapsible bags, which are used once and subsequently disposed. An example of use of these disposable or single-use bags is in a system for mixing two or more ingredients, at least one of which is liquid and the other(s) being liquid or solid, and the bag has a mixing element or the like for causing the contents to mix as uniformly as possible. An example of a disposable container is a bioreactor or fermenter bag in which cells are either in suspension or on microcarriers and the container has a mixing system for circulating the liquid, gases, and in some cases the cells within the interior of the container.
Many conventional mixing bags, which typically range in size from three (3) Liter to smaller and fifty (50) liter or larger, i.e., 5000 liter, are shaped like cylinders, with the bottom of the bag optionally forming a cone, to mimic the shape of stainless-steel tanks that the disposable bags are replacing. Cylindrical shaped bioreactors allow the contents of the bag to be mixed in an efficient manner. Typically, the bag contains a mixer for mixing or circulating the contents, such as a magnetically coupled impeller contained within the bag and a magnetic motor outside the bag, which remotely causes the impeller to rotate. The containers also can contain one or more aeration devices, e.g., gas spargers, through which gas bubbles are introduced into the container contents. The contents are typically biopharmaceutical or other biological fluids. Such fluids typically comprise cell culture media and adjuvants. The containers contain gases, such as air, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, etc. Spargers for use with 50-5000 liter bioreactors have air supplied through the bottom of the bioreactor. Because of the pressure of 50-5000 liters of fluid, spargers must have check valves or use high pressures to create the back pressure necessary to prevent liquids from back flowing into the sparger during aeration.
Aeration of biological fluids within bioreactors is common to support cell culture oxygenation via sparing devices. However, the use of high gas flow rates used to achieve high levels of oxygenation, measured as kLa, can result in high speeds and very small bubbles, which can cause cell shear and induce cell death; wherein kLa is a gas transfer coefficient, e.g., a measurement of the capacity of the bioreactor to transfer oxygen into the culture. High speeds and small bubbles can result in undesirable bioprocess product losses or changes in product quality, yet, a high kLa is requisite to achieving high cell density, for example in perfusion processes. Hence distribution of gas flow can be achieved to maximize gas transfer to achieve a high kLa by using sparging, suitable for specific flow requirements.
Past attempts for sparging devices include drilled hole spargers, which were created from a film or a mold. These devices aimed to control the bubble size and/or the exit gas velocity of air. However, for film spargers the flexibility of the film material resulted in a lack of a controlled pressure gradient across the sparger area, resulting in lower oxygen transfer, wider distribution of bubble sizes and leakage. Molded devices are expensive and bulky, may occupy significant space inside single use bioreactors, and damage the interior of bioreactors during transit. Another prior art flexible sparger, comprising two film layers lacked an even distribution of air, i.e., the air flow goes out the highest point of the sparger and did not distribute air to the entire area of sparger, e.g., in discrete pockets only.
As noted above, bubble size of aerated gases is important. In bioreactor applications, for example, a balance exists for managing bubble number and sizes such that mass transfer from the gas-liquid phase or vice versa is sufficient for the process while preventing negative culture effects such as significant shear or foaming. Generally, smaller bubble sizes are more efficient in transferring gas from the bubble to the liquid or biological fluid, due to an increased surface area. However, the smaller the bubble, the greater the potential damage to cells as compared to larger bubble sizes due to their similar size to cells and their potential to promote accumulation of foam on the liquid surface. Similarly, creating and maintaining a generally homogenous environment for the contents of the container, such as cells in culture, is also important in bioreactor/bioprocessing operations. It is undesirable to have regions and/or gradients, i.e., differences in mixing (pH, nutrients, and dissolved gases), shear, temperature, etc., within bioreactors. Some cell culture processes may require the highest possible mass transfer capabilities while others may require specific bubble sizes that are large enough so that sensitive cells are unharmed. To date, there was no sparging device suitable for balancing bubble sizes with shear and foam generation.
It is therefore an advance to provide a container or bioreactor, such as a disposable or single-use container or bioreactor for biological fluids, wherein a sparging device(s) aid in optimal cell culture growth performance and viability by providing sparging devices that are small, flexible, and can balance the competing aspects of bubble size, shearing, foaming, air distribution, and other bioprocessing conditions.
Embodiments of a multi-layered drilled hole flexible sparger comprising three film layers and two mesh layers, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims, are disclosed. Novel and inventive features of the present disclosure, as well as details of exemplary embodiments thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings. Some embodiments of the disclosure include a multi-layered flexible sparger that has a bottom film layer, a middle film layer, and a top film layer; a first inner mesh disposed between the bottom film layer and the middle film layer; a second inner mesh disposed between the middle film layer and the top film layer; and a port capable of delivering a gas to the multi-layered flexible sparger disposed between the top film layer and the bottom film layer, wherein the middle film layer comprises drill holes and the top film layer comprises drill holes. Some embodiments of the disclosure include a multi-zone, multi-layered, flexible sparger having a bottom film layer, a middle film layer, and a top film layer; a first inner mesh disposed between and bonded to the bottom film layer and the middle film layer; a second inner mesh disposed between and bonded to the middle film layer and the top film layer; and a port capable of delivering a gas to at least two sparging zones within the multi-zone, multi-layered flexible sparger disposed between the top film layer and the bottom film layer, wherein the middle film layer comprises drill holes and the top film layer comprises drill holes.
In some embodiments, the multi-layered flexible drilled hole sparger is a single-use sparger. Some embodiments comprise wherein the middle film layer contains a low number of small drilled holes that resists air flow and creates back pressure between the middle and bottom film layers. A middle layer having a low number, for example, between 1% and 50% as many drilled holes and/or smaller drilled holes compared with the top layer. In some embodiments, the middle layer comprises between 5-25% as many holes as the top layer. In some embodiments, the middle layer comprises between 10-20% as many holes as the top layer. Also, for example, drilled holes having a diameter of between 5 and 1000 microns, promotes back pressure and gas distribution over the middle layer. Embodiments of the disclosure include a middle film layer having a number and size of drilled holes that resists air flow and creates back pressure between the middle and bottom film layers. Also, for example, drilled holes having a diameter of between 5 and 1000 microns, promotes back pressure and gas distribution over the middle layer. The top film layer contains drilled holes designed for a specific exit gas velocity and bubble size. A layer of mesh exists between the top film layer and the middle film layer to provide support for the film and physical separation of film layers for air flow to distribute across the sparging area.
The top film layer contains drilled holes designed for a specific exit gas velocity and bubble size. A layer of mesh exists between the top film layer and the middle film layer to provide support for the film and physical separation of film layers for air flow to distribute across the sparging area. The top and middle film layers are bonded into sections that restricts air flow to specific areas regardless of sparger orientation. The at least three film layers are bonded around the perimeter of the sparger and at an area in the center of the sparger. Embodiments of the spargers disclosed herein demonstrate substantially equal distribution of the gas flow rate throughout the sparger regardless of sparger orientation. Embodiments of the spargers disclosed herein provide uniform bubble size independent of gas flow rate. Embodiments of the spargers disclosed herein advance the art because the sparger designs herein widen optimal performance windows, offer high kLa for increased cell density, ease of manufacturing, and flexibility for ease of integration within existing bioreactors and containers. Some embodiments include the use of multiple spargers within one bioreactor. Some embodiments include means for switching between spargers having differing pore sizes and/or kLa characteristics. Such means comprise optimizing and varying gas flow ranges using manifolds and control schemes controlled by microprocessor-controlled bioreactors and mass-flow controllers. In some embodiments, desired kLa characteristics are achieved using the microprocessor-controlled bioreactors and mass flow controllers and further combined with multiple spargers capable of producing differing bubble sizes. These advances and others embodied herein will become clear from the description, claims, and figures below. Various benefits, aspects, novel and inventive features of the present disclosure, as well as details of exemplary embodiments thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings. So, the manner in which the features disclosed herein can be understood in detail, more particular descriptions of the embodiments of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the appended drawings it is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this disclosure and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the described embodiments may admit to other equally effective bags, biocontainers, films, and/or materials. It is also to be understood that elements and features of one embodiment may be found in other embodiments without further recitation and that, where possible, identical reference numerals have been used to indicate comparable elements that are common to the figures. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which these embodiments pertain.
The term film within the meaning of this disclosure means any flexible material that is capable of being fused with another flexible film, including, but not limited to, polymeric sheet, composites, laminates, single-layer, and/or multi-layer polymeric materials. These films may further comprise substrates, which may comprise plastics netting, wovens, non-wovens, knits, and/or metallic foils and other flexible structures and materials. The films may comprise, for example, a polyolefinic material, e.g., low density polyethylene, linear low-density polyethylene, middle density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, ultra-high density polyethylene, polypropylene, and other polyolefins. In some embodiments, the flexible films comprise a laminate film structure with a lower melting point material internal to an external higher melting point polymer. Also, in some embodiments, the flexible films comprise a laminate film structure with a lower melting point material surrounding a higher melting point woven, knit, or non-woven material. In some embodiments, any or all of the bottom film, middle film, or the top film comprise any of the films as described in WO Publication WO2020101848A1, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In some embodiments, one or more of these films is/are substantially similar to a PUREFLEX®, PUREFLEX PLUS® or ULTIMUS® film as marketed by EMD Millipore Corporation, Burlington, MA, USA. The films herein discussed may be multi-layered films comprising one or more layers of polyethylenes, ethylene vinyl acetates, ethyl vinyl alcohol, and other materials. In some embodiments, any or all of the bottom film, middle film and/or top film comprise a substrate that is netting, wovens, non-wovens, knits, and other structures that are, for example, made of nylons, polyamides, and other abrasion resistant materials, wherein various tie layers, e.g., polyurethanes, may be disposed between layers.
The term biocontainer is defined broadly as any flexible container or vessel capable of holding a fluid within an internal volume or region, and may be in the form of a two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and/or multi-faceted bag or bioreactor. In some embodiments, the biocontainer or bioreactor has a baffle incorporated therein, wherein the baffle is capable of disrupting a vortex within a liquid formed when a mixer, such as an impeller, mixes the liquid.
In some embodiments, the first and/or second inner mesh comprise a woven or extruded mesh, embossed and/or apertured film, or a membrane having a low open area (areas open to gas flow) as a middle layer to create back pressure, such that air is distributed through all openings on the middle layer. In some embodiments, flow pockets are created by means of sealing layers of film together, wherein air or gas flow is directed to specific areas of the flexible sparger, achieving a substantially even distribution of gas flow within the flexible sparger, resulting in consistent bubble size and bubble velocity across a surface of the flexible sparger regardless of sparger orientation angle, gas flow rate, or a head pressure. For example, the flexible sparger 200 further comprises flow pockets 208. As shown, there are eight flow pockets 208. The flow pockets 208 are formed by bonds, such as can be made by ultrasonic welding, heat welding, adhesives, etc., and other methods for joining plastics films as is known to those in the art. In some embodiments, bonds are formed using high frequency/radio frequency (RF) bonding. In some embodiments, the RF bonding process is a two-step RF bonding process. In some embodiments, the RF bonding process is a three-step RF bonding process. RF welding is the placement of plastics materials between two opposing metallic plates. Pressure is applied to the plates, and therefore onto the plastics, while RF waves are sent through the plates, creating heat that fuses the plastics together. A bond 210 is made just inside of the perimeter of the flexible sparger 200. A central bond 212 is made in the center, wherein all layers are bonded together. And eight radial legs 214 projecting from the central bond 212 and the perimeter bond 210. The perimeter bond 210 is made through that is inclusive of the bottom film layer 102, the middle film layer 106, and the top film layer 110. The flow pockets 208 are formed by sealing the top film layer 110 and the middle film layer 106. Optionally, a spot bond 216 is made in each flow pocket 208 by bonding the middle layer 106 with the second inner mesh 114.
As shown, the multi-layered sparger 400 has an arcuate perimeter. The central bond 413a, 413b, in some embodiments, forms a central hole 444. The central hole 444, which is optional, can be used for locating, joining, releasably attaching, etc., the multi-layered sparger 400 onto, for example, a post within a bioreactor (not shown). A port 404 is shown in a flange 401. The flange 401 is formed from one or more of the layers forming the multi-layered sparger 400. A bond 427 is also shown, which is between all five layers. As shown below, the bond 427 does not necessarily comprise a material in all five layers. For example, a window 417, as discussed below, is present in some layers in some embodiments. Also, in some embodiments, a tab 421 is optionally disposed within the multi-layered sparger 400.
A port hole 415b allows the port 404 to penetrate therethrough during assembly. The second mesh layer 416 comprises tabs 409 and the radial legs 414. As shown, the radial legs 414 are cutouts from the second mesh layer 416. The second mesh layer optionally comprises perimeter cutouts 438, which may promote bonding to the adjacent layers, e.g., the middle film layer 406 and the top film layer 410. The top film layer comprises the drill holes 450, which deliver a gas(es) to a biological fluid during bioprocesses. The top film layer 410 further comprises the central bond 413a area, which surrounds the post hole 444a and a port hole 415a. The top film layer 410 further comprises a tab 419 having two holes for locating or for anchoring to a bioreactor. The top film layer 410 further comprises tabs 411 and optionally tab 421. Also, the tab 421 may comprise an optional slit 446, which can be used for tube management, i.e., a gas supply tube that is connected with the port 404. A gas delivered into the multi-layered sparger 400 via the port 404 travels between the bottom film layer 402 and the middle film layer 406, around the first mesh layer 408. From there, the gas can travel through the drill holes 450 in the middle film layer 406, into the eight flow pockets 448, and through the drill holes 450 in the top film layer 410 into the fluid within the bioreactor bag.
In addition, some embodiments of the flexible sparger(s) may be designed to have differing number of sections and section shapes, depending on a tilt of bioreactor, pressure needs, and/or drilled hole configuration(s). In some embodiments, the woven or extruded mesh, embossed and/or apertured film, or membrane placed between two bonded pieces of laser- or needle-perforated film, woven or extruded mesh, or membrane enables the even distribution of gas flow to maximize gas transfer to achieve a high kLa. The bubble size produced by the flexible sparger can be controlled using more or less open areas (areas open to gas flow) between mesh(es) and/or film layers. Additionally, bubble size can be controlled by employing differing shapes, e.g., open areas in the shape or profile of crosses, slots, and/or crooks. Patterns and spacing (density) of open areas can be adjusted to optimize kLa for gas requirements of bioprocesses. Gas velocity has been identified as a significant factor for kLa. Patterns and spacing of open areas of either mesh or perforated film are driven by gas velocity calculations for a range of flow rates. Calculated gas velocity from patterns and spacing of open areas and maximum flow rate allow for scalable solution(s) from 50-2000 L bioreactor sizes based on keeping constant velocity and maximum flow rate(s) of the bioreactor system.
A total sparging area of the flexible sparger can be varied to suit specific flow requirements (which is, for example, cell density driven), resulting in consistent bubble velocity across ranges of air or gas flow. In some embodiments, multiple spargers (or a single flexible sparger comprising multiple sections) can be manufactured from a single set of film sheets. In some embodiments, one or more sections of the flexible sparger are not utilized at low gas flow rates. A partial seal maintains separation between sparging sections at low flow rates and ruptures at higher gas flow rates, allowing consistent bubble velocity across gas flow ranges by increasing the total sparging area.
Some embodiments of the disclosure described herein comprise means of switching between spargers having different pore sizes and kLa performance, which depend on gas flow ranges/requirements, that uses computerized bioreactor control platform by utilizing new mass flow controllers, a new manifold, and a new control scheme. Having multiple spargers having different bubble sizes produces different kLa performance. Having multiple options for kLa performance allows precise control for specific cell lines. Flexible sparger design allows for optimizable shape and placement in a bottom of bioreactor bag to improve kLa. Some embodiments of the flexible sparger(s) allow for proper aeration of a fluid sample while creating a homogenous environment without negatively, via shear or significant foaming, impacting the fluid contents of the vessel.
Gas velocity is identified as a significant factor for kLa. Patterns and spacing of open areas of either mesh or perforated film are driven by gas velocity calculations for a range of flow rates. In certain cell lines, high bubble velocity may be a cause of shear, and it is recommended to keep gas velocity below 30 m/s operating range. In order to keep cells safe for a majority of cell lines and to have the highest performance possible, some embodiments of the flexible spargers are designed around a constant gas velocity at the maximum flow rate of the bioreactor system. For higher performing flexible spargers, a lower flow rate may be used to determine shear limit, rather than maximum flow rate of the system.
where m is meters and s indicates seconds.
Within the above gas velocity equation, the open area of the sparger is defined by the area of each drilled hole multiplied by the number of holes defined by spacing and pattern of drilled holes in sparging area. Calculating gas velocity and defining drilled hole pattern according to constant 30 m/s at maximum flow for the system has several benefits such as identifying a predictable kLa performance and a strategy for scalability. For example, rather than scaling up by changing hole size and therefore bubble size, scalability is performed using velocity calculations, so the number of holes and the size of holes may be chosen for each scale depending on performance limits and constant velocity. This proved successful in scaling drilled hole spargers.
Graph 1 shows comparative data for four 200-liter flexible spargers, according to embodiments of the disclosure.
Graph 2 shows comparative data for flexible spargers for 200-liter and 2000-liter bioreactors, according to embodiments of the disclosure. The maximum flow rate of the system is plotted against kLa, as defined herein. For the 200 L bioreactor systems, a range from 0-50 SLPM is shown, e.g., 50 SLPM is 100% of maximum flow rate. As can be seen, the performance curves of higher performing sparger at high power (i.e., a best case) and lower performing sparger at low power (i.e., a worst case) are substantially similar for both scales of 200 and 2000 L. Outcome produced predictable, scalable kLa between sizes. Scaling may also be done by number of holes and changing sparging area for other bioreactor sizes rather than number of spargers each with constant areas. A flow rate could be increased for larger bioreactors, e.g., >1000 L or, alternatively, the number of flexible spargers in concert with a specified flow rate could be increased.
Graph 3 shows comparative data for novel multi-layered flexible spargers against molded spargers, according to embodiments of the disclosure herein, versus molded spargers, wherein a flow rate (standard liters per minute (SLPM)) is plotted against kLa in a 200 L bioreactor. Flexible spargers may risk performance by lack of air distribution and unable to hold down sparging material properly. However, it is to be noted that the performance(s) of embodiments of the novel multi-layered flexible spargers, according to embodiments described herein, is comparable or superior to molded spargers, wherein the flexible spargers are more easily manufactured and packaged. Furthermore, some embodiments comprise drilled holes having sizes between 5 microns to 1000 microns or any size therebetween. In some embodiments, the drilled holes are between 20 microns and 800 microns in diameter. In some embodiments, the drilled holes are between 20 microns and 150 microns and any diameter therebetween. In some embodiments, the drilled holes are between 70 microns and 150 microns and any diameter therebetween. In some embodiments, the drilled holes are between 150 microns and 500 microns and any diameter therebetween. In any flexible sparger, the number of drilled holes may be chosen by maintaining constant the velocity air. Also, the size of the drilled holes is dependent on the shear tolerated by any cells in the bioprocess. Specifically, 5 micron drilled holes produce greater shear. Therefore, shear-sensitive cells may process better using a flexible sparger having, for example, 20 micron drilled holes. The two 20 micron curves show 45 kLa at 20 SLPM while the two 150 micron curves show approximately 30 kLa at 20 SLPM.
Graph 4 shows updated flexible prototype bubble size analysis. Bubble size (in micrometers) is found to remain constant within standard deviation regardless of flow rate (as measured by vvm). For example, 1 vessel volumes per minute (vvm) (L/Um) means in 1 minute there is 1 liter of air passing through 1 liter of medium. Accordingly, a constant and predictable bubble size is known and maintained.
It is also to be understood that another advance over other spargers is via determination that keeping an open area constant can be employed to determine how many holes to use irrespective of whether larger or smaller drilled holes are employed, and, therefore, scalability. Furthermore, for larger bags or bioreactors, e.g., 2000 L, more spargers, for example, four, five or six spargers may be used as opposed to using a single sparger having larger holes.
Graph 5 is a process that is useful for choosing a number of holes (from 0 to 8000 holes) for a flexible sparger design based off of a velocity limit for air flow of 30 m/s for various hole sizes, ranging from 10-800 micron hole sizes for different embodiments of flexible spargers. From left to right, the curves shown are 800 microns, 150 microns, and 20 microns in diameter.
Graph 6 is a process useful for specifying the number of spargers that might be used for a 200 L bioreactor and a 2000 L bioreactor at a specified air flow velocity. One sparger could be used for a 200 L bioreactor at an air flow of 30 m/s. To keep velocity constant at 30 m/s, four spargers used at 2000 L scale, or increasing the sparging area to have four times the number of holes. In some embodiments, a plurality of spargers is employed, e.g., 2-8 spargers.
During bioprocessing, several modes of operation are possible. For example, sparging into bioreactors, e.g., single use bioreactors, can include continuous gas flow modes, a recipe mode or feedback control loops through software and microprocessors, a manual operation of flow rates, and/or a designation of specific spargers by use of valve manifold. It is to be further understood that some bioprocesses can include two or more of these sparging modes.
All ranges recited herein include ranges therebetween and can be inclusive or exclusive of the endpoints. Optional included ranges are from integer values therebetween (or inclusive of one original endpoint), at the order of magnitude recited or the next smaller order of magnitude. For example, if the lower range value is 0.2, optional included endpoints can be 0.3, 0.4, . . . 1.1, 1.2, and the like, as well as 1, 2, 3 and the like; if the higher range is 8, optional included endpoints can be 7, 6, and the like, as well as 7.9, 7.8, and the like. One-sided boundaries, such as 3 or more, similarly include consistent boundaries (or ranges) starting at integer values at the recited order of magnitude or one lower. For example, 3 or more includes 4, or 3.1 or more.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “certain embodiments,” “one or more embodiments,” “some embodiments,” or “an embodiment” indicates that a feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. Therefore, the appearances of the phrases such as “in one or more embodiments,” “in certain embodiments,” “in one embodiment,” “some embodiments,” or “in an embodiment” throughout this specification are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Nonetheless, it is to be understood that any feature described herein can be incorporated within any embodiment(s) disclosed herein. Publications of patent applications and patents and other non-patent references, cited in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety in the entire portion cited as if each individual publication or reference were specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference herein as being fully set forth. Any patent application to which this application claims priority is also incorporated by reference herein in the manner described above for publications and references.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/175,696, filed on Apr. 16, 2021, the entire contents of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety FIELD Embodiments disclosed herein relate to devices for the bioprocessing of biological fluids. More particularly, the devices include aeration devices for use within a container or vessel, such as a bioreactor, e.g., single use stirred tank bioreactors having volumes between 50-5000 liters.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2022/024843 | 4/14/2022 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63175696 | Apr 2021 | US |