The present application is related to (1) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/955,104 filed Dec. 12, 2007 and entitled “Single Number Presentation for Dual-Mode Phones”; (2) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/963,275 filed Dec. 21, 2007 and entitled “Indicators for Dual-Mode Phones”; and (3) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/955,108 filed Dec. 12, 2007 and entitled “Delayed ACK in Dual-Mode Call Handover”, all incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to the operation of dual-mode phones, and more particularly, to handling voicemail in dual-mode phones.
Dual-mode phones support connections via Wi-Fi and cellular networks. In an enterprise environment, calls placed to phone numbers associated with the enterprise are sent from the enterprise SIP PBX to a mobility controller. The mobility controller then attempts to forward the incoming call through the enterprise Wi-Fi network to the proper dual-mode phone. If the desired dual-mode phone is not available on the enterprise Wi-Fi network, the mobility controller establishes a call through the SIP PBX to the cellular side of the desired dual-mode phone.
A problem arises however, as the enterprise provides a voicemail system to enterprise users, but when a call is forwarded by the enterprise mobility controller to the cellular side of a dual-mode phone, the enterprise user no longer has any indication of whether or not voicemail has been left with the separate cellular network; the enterprise and cellular voicemail systems are separate.
The invention may be best understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings that are used to illustrate embodiments of the invention in which:
Embodiments of the invention relate to dual-mode phones, and to redirecting voicemail in systems employing dual-mode phones. In an embodiment of the invention, a dual-mode phone when operating in its cellular mode sends out a predetermined signal, such as a predetermined set of DTMF tones, when the operator of the dual-mode phone answers a call. An enterprise mobility controller working through an enterprise SIP PBX uses this predetermined signal, and its absence, to detect when a call forwarded from the enterprise to the cellular side of a dual-mode phone has be en transferred to cellular voicemail. When a transfer to the cellular voicemail system is detected, the mobility controller breaks the cellular call and reroutes the call to the enterprise voicemail system.
As understood in the art, such a hardware platform as shown in
Dual-mode phone 300 has first radio subsystem 310 for Wi-Fi communications such as to Wi-Fi network controller 130. Dual-mode phone 300 also has second radio subsystem 320 for communicating with cellular network 230 and through public switched telephone network 200. As is common with many such devices, dual-mode phone 300 is a digital device operating under control of CPU 330 through programs and data stored in memory hierarchy 340. Other aspects of dual-mode phone 300 such as speakers, microphones, power and display, keyboards and the like are understood by those in the art, and are not shown.
In operation, PSTN call 240 arrives at enterprise PBX 100. If PBX 100 determines that the requested destination is busy, it routes the call to enterprise voicemail system 110. If PBX 100 determines that the destination is not busy and is owned by mobility controller 120, it routes the call to mobility controller 120. If dual-mode phone 300 is within range of Wi-Fi network controller 130, the call is routed through mobility controller 120 and Wi-Fi network 130 to the Wi-Fi side 310 of dual-mode phone 300.
If dual-mode phone 300 is not within range of Wi-Fi network controller 130, mobility controller 120 initiates a PSTN call through PBX 100, PSTN 200, and cellular network 230 to pass the call to the cellular side 320 of dual-mode phone 300.
While mobility controller 120 receives a SIP indication (“200 OK”) when the cellular call has gone through, it cannot tell if this is due to the user answering the call, or the cellular voicemail system answering the call.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, dual-mode phone 300 is modified so that it transmits a predetermined signal when the user answers a cell call. This signal may be, for example, a predetermined touchtone pattern, such as “#*#” or some other predetermined signal. When controller 120 initiates the PSTN connection with the cellular side 320 of dual-mode phone 300, it negotiates call parameters including packetized DTMF tones according to RFC 2833.
When controller 120 receives the SIP indication that the cellular call has gone through, it starts a timer for a predetermined time, as an example five seconds.
If controller 120 receives the predetermined signal before the timer expires, it knows that the user has answered the call, and routes call 240 through to the cellular call just established.
If controller 120 does not receive the predetermined signal before the timer expires, it knows that the call has been picked up by the cellular voicemail system. It terminates the cellular call, and instructs PBX 100 to route the call to enterprise voicemail system 110.
In a second embodiment of the invention, this notification and detection logic is inverted. In this embodiment, the cellular voicemail system is programmed to produce a predetermined signal when it answers calls. When mobility controller 120 receives this predetermined signal, it knows that the cellular voicemail system has picked up the call, and can terminate the cellular call and reroute the call to enterprise voicemail system 110.
While the invention has been described in terms of various embodiments, the invention should not be limited to only those embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is this to be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5125021 | Lebowitz | Jun 1992 | A |
5260988 | Schellinger et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5388101 | Dinkins | Feb 1995 | A |
5592491 | Dinkins | Jan 1997 | A |
5594782 | Zicker et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
6445921 | Bell | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6614786 | Byers | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6975602 | Anderson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7035260 | Betta | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7231205 | Guyot et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7308263 | Gallagher et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7414992 | Hirsbrunner et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7492872 | Di Carlo et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7565145 | Gallagher et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7606190 | Markovic et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7768977 | Camp, Jr. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7826868 | Robbins et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8000739 | Bajpai et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8295878 | Bajpai et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20020111198 | Heie | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132638 | Plahte et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030139180 | McIntosh et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040033811 | Tsai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040264410 | Sagi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060023658 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058050 | Park | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060223555 | Kim | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239277 | Gallagher | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070014260 | Seo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070149176 | Wells et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165825 | Ko et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070207804 | Sharma et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070268858 | Soto | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281682 | Raju et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002605 | Todd et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080085728 | Reding | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080112392 | Mansfield | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139228 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090156217 | Bajpai | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163229 | Bajpai et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100105379 | Bonner et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
H. Schulzrinne et al., “RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals”, Network Working Group, May 2000, 1-30. |
R. Many et al., “A Message Summary and Message Waiting Indication Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)”, Network Working Group, Aug. 2004, 1-19. |
S. Bellovin et al., “Security Mechanisms for the Internet”, Network Working Group, Dec. 2003, 1-20. |
H. Schulzrinne et al., “RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications”, Network Working Group, Jul. 2003, 1-89. |
J. Rosenberg et al., “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol”, Network Working Group, Jun. 2002, 1-269. |
United States Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,104, filed Dec. 12, 2007 entitled Single Number Presentation for Dual-Mode Phones. |
United States Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,275, filed Dec. 12, 2007 entitled Indicators for Dual-Mode Phones. |
United States Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,104, filed Dec. 12, 2007 entitled Single Number Presentation for Dual-Mode Phones. |
United States Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,108, filed Dec. 12, 2007 entitled Delayed ACK in Dual-Mode Call Handover. |
United States Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,275, filed Dec. 12, 2007 entitled Indicators for Dual Mode Phones. |
United States Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,756, filed Jul. 7, 2008 entitled Enterprise Seamless Mobility. |
United States Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,108, filed Dec. 12, 2007 entitled Delayed ACK in Dual-Mode Call Handover. |
United States Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,108, filed Dec. 12, 2007 entitled Indicators for Dual Mode Phones. |
United States Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,756. |
United States Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/191,324, filed Jul. 26, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,756, Non-Final Office Action, mailed Nov. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,275, Non-Final Office Action, mailed Mar. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,275, Final Office Action, mailed Jul. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/963,275, Non-Final Office Action, mailed Dec. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/168,756, Final Office Action, mailed Jun. 12, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090156175 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |