The invention relates to grid tees for suspended ceilings and, in particular, to an improved grid tee construction and method of its production.
Suspended ceilings typically use a rectangular metal grid made up of main runners and cross runners. The grid supports ceiling panels or tiles normally laid onto the upper faces of runner or tee flanges or, less commonly, large panels are screwed to lower faces of the flanges. The runners commonly have an inverted T-shaped cross-section and are typically roll-formed from strips of sheet metal. The lower flange portions of the tee section extend horizontally from both sides of a vertical central web. The upper edge of the web is conventionally reinforced with a hollow bulb.
The grid runners or tees are supplied in different strengths, e.g. intermediate and heavy duty, to satisfy the requirements of a particular installation. The specified strength or rating can depend, for example, on the use of a space below the ceiling, seismic conditions, and so forth. The industry currently recognizes an intermediate duty load rating and a higher capacity “heavy duty” load rating.
The cross-sectional geometry of conventional grid tee runners is relatively standard, commonly being 1-½″ high, 15/16″ wide and having a reinforcing bulb width of ¼″. Suspended ceiling grid is in a near commodity status and sales of the same can be largely price driven. Therefore, it is imperative for a manufacturer to put no more material, i.e. steel, in the product, than is necessary to meet a customer's needs. The strength of a grid tee is directly related to the gauge or thickness of the sheet metal used in its production. Where a lighter duty product is being made, a lighter or thinner gauge sheet metal stock can be used and where a heavier duty product is called for, a heavier gauge metal strip can be used to produce the grid tee. The common practice of producing different rated grid tees by changing the thickness of the stock used to make the tees has certain costs associated with the labor and manufacturing down time necessary for changing over and adjusting the roller dies that are used for different gauges of sheet stock. Additionally, a manufacturer can be forced to buy and inventory multiple gauges of sheet steel for producing grid tees of different load ratings when following prior art practices.
The invention provides a novel method for producing grid tee runners and novel runners produced by such method. The disclosed method enables a manufacturer to produce grid tees of different load ratings while having the same overall roll formed configuration and being constructed of the same gauge or thickness of sheet metal. More particularly, the invention is applicable to the inverted tee style of grid runner that has a single layer web and, ordinarily, is formed of a single strip of sheet metal. With the invention, additional strength, beyond the load capacity or rating attainable with a conventional configuration and a given gauge and quality of material is obtained by constructing the grid tee reinforcing bulb with at least a partial double layer of sheet material.
The invention approaches an ideal construction because it locates the material added for increased strength into the area of the bulb. This is advantageous since the additional material is situated as far or nearly as far as possible from the neutral axis, located near the mid-height of the web, thereby obtaining a high beam strength.
Where the double layer extends along less than the full perimeter of the reinforcing bulb, it can be arranged, more or less, on either side of the plane of the web relative to a flange construction that is half double layer and essentially half single layer. The invention, by utilizing the same gauge of material, for different duty ratings, enables the manufacturer to reduce its costs of production. The invention permits the manufacturer to keep the material content as low as practical and at the same time allows certain labor costs and machine down time to be avoided. Labor costs and machine down time are minimized since there is no need to change over the rolling dies to run different gauges of strip stock.
The invention can extend the versatility of existing tooling since it can allow manufacture of higher duty products, even though such tooling is limited to running lighter gauge material. Down time or change over time to run higher or lower duty product in a roll forming machine is virtually eliminated with the invention since the only change essentially required is that of changing the width of the stock being fed to the machine. Economy can also be gained with the invention since the material used for different load ratings need only vary in width. This enables the grid runner manufacturer to buy and inventory master coils of one gauge and to simply slit such roll stock to the widths needed. The disclosed grid can be easier to install and, therefore, has greater marketability because it is easier to field cut the web by hand with a tin snips, for example, than to cut grid tee made with heavier stock.
The invention pertains to a method of producing sheet metal grid runners of the inverted tee style. The grid runner tees are used in construction of suspended ceilings, soffits, and like structures.
The various grid tees disclosed herein preferably though not necessarily, have industry standard overall dimensions. If standard, the lower face of the flange 15 is nominally 15/16″ wide, the height of the bulb from the flange is 1-½″ and the bulb width is ¼″. Some commercially used grid tees of other constructions have taller tees of, for example, 1-⅝″. In the style of grid tee shown in
The illustrated reinforcing bulb 16 has a generally circular cross-section with its center at the plane of the web 17 so that it is symmetrically arranged over the web. As shown, the bulb cross-section is substantially a fully closed circle with the edge 13 closely adjacent or contacting a zone 26 where the sheet or strip of metal 11 making the tee 10 transitions between an upper region of the web 17 and the bulb 16. This zone 26 is displaced, measuring along the body of the strip 11 in the width-wise direction of the strip, a distance from the edge 13 about the same as the circumference of the bulb 16.
As mentioned,
In
In the grid tee constructions of
The invention suggests the use of an additional width of sheet metal strip stock beyond that used to form a single layer web, single layer hollow bulb grid tee, i.e. a conventional grid tee, and to dispose this additional, integral width of material as an extension of the single wall reinforcing bulb so that such extra material is disposed where it is, at least to some extent, remote from the neutral axis of the grid tee, which typically is in a central area or region of the height of a web. The invention, additionally, comprehends the production of grid tees of similar, or identical external shapes using the same gauge or material stock thickness but with different load capacities by virtue of having a reinforcing bulb of at least a partial double layer in some production runs and in other production runs a grid tee with a bulb that is essentially exclusively a single layer. As discussed, the partial or wholly double wall reinforcing bulb grid tees can be made on the same roll-forming production tooling as the grid tees such as shown in
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
683996 | Schmeltzer | Oct 1901 | A |
1407242 | Wylie | Feb 1922 | A |
1457303 | Higgins | Jun 1923 | A |
2065378 | Kling | Dec 1936 | A |
3043408 | Attwood | Jul 1962 | A |
3159252 | Cotts | Dec 1964 | A |
3369332 | Harlan | Feb 1968 | A |
3370301 | Harlan | Feb 1968 | A |
3595056 | Hutton | Jul 1971 | A |
3832816 | Jahn | Sep 1974 | A |
3898784 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
4206578 | Mieyal | Jun 1980 | A |
4329824 | Lowe | May 1982 | A |
RE31528 | Mieyal | Mar 1984 | E |
4455806 | Rice | Jun 1984 | A |
4490958 | Lowe | Jan 1985 | A |
4520609 | Worley et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4535580 | Shirey | Aug 1985 | A |
4691494 | Gwynne | Sep 1987 | A |
4852325 | Dunn et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4932186 | Jahn | Jun 1990 | A |
5501053 | Goleby | Mar 1996 | A |
6436552 | Walker et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7516585 | Lehane et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080289280 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11535546 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 12187462 | US |