Nanocrystalline materials may be susceptible to grain growth. The susceptibility may make it difficult to produce bulk nanocrystalline materials with high relative densities and small grain sizes utilizing pre-existing sintering techniques. Additionally, the susceptibility may limit the ability of sintered nanocrystalline materials to be subjected to post-sintering processing techniques without experiencing undesired grain growth.
In view of the foregoing, the present Inventors have recognized and appreciated the advantages of a nanocrystalline alloy with controlled grain size. A nanocrystalline alloy with controlled grain size may be produced by sintering a plurality of nanocrystalline particulates.
Accordingly, provided in one embodiment herein is a method, comprising: sintering a plurality of nanocrystalline particulates to form a nanocrystalline alloy. At least some of the nanocrystalline particulates may include a non-equilibrium phase comprising a first metal material and a second metal material. The first metal material may be soluble in the second metal material.
In another embodiment, a method is provided that includes sintering a plurality of nanocrystalline particulates to form a nanocrystalline alloy. At least some of the nanocrystalline particulates may include a non-equilibrium phase comprising a first metal material and a second metal material. The sintering may involve a first sintering temperature, and the first sintering temperature may be lower than a second sintering temperature needed for sintering the first metal material in the absence of the second metal material.
In another embodiment, a sintered nanocrystalline alloy that includes at least one of tungsten and chromium is provided, wherein the nanocrystalline alloy has a relative density of at least about 90%. In one embodiment, this sintered nanocrystalline alloy includes tungsten. In another embodiment, this sintered nanocrystalline alloy includes both tungsten and chromium.
Accordingly, provided in one embodiment is a method, comprising: sintering a plurality of nanocrystalline particulates to form a nanocrystalline alloy. At least some of the nanocrystalline particulates may include a non-equilibrium phase comprising a first metal material and a second metal material. The first metal material may be soluble in the second metal material. The nanocrystalline alloy has a relative density of at least about 90%.
It should be appreciated that all combinations of the foregoing concepts and additional concepts discussed in greater detail below (provided such concepts are not mutually inconsistent) are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. In particular, all combinations of claimed subject matter appearing at the end of this disclosure are contemplated as being part of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein. It should also be appreciated that terminology explicitly employed herein that also may appear in any disclosure incorporated by reference should be accorded a meaning most consistent with the particular concepts disclosed herein.
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings primarily are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter described herein. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; in some instances, various aspects of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may be shown exaggerated or enlarged in the drawings to facilitate an understanding of different features. In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to like features (e.g., functionally similar and/or structurally similar elements).
Following below are more detailed descriptions of various concepts related to, and embodiments of, inventive sintering methods and sintered nanocrystalline alloys. It should be appreciated that various concepts introduced above and discussed in greater detail below may be implemented in any of numerous ways, as the disclosed concepts are not limited to any particular manner of implementation. Examples of specific implementations and applications are provided primarily for illustrative purposes.
Introduction
Desirable properties, such as high strength and increased resistance, have spurred considerable research in nanocrystalline metals with an average grain size generally smaller than 100 nm. These properties may arise from a high number of grain boundaries and may vary greatly even with small variations in grain size.
Additionally, specific grain size (or size range) may correspond to the desired mechanical properties. As shown in
Nanocrystalline Materials
Nanocrystalline materials may generally refer to materials that comprise grains with a size in the nanometer range—i.e., smaller than about 1000 nm: e.g., smaller than or equal to about 900 nm, about 800 nm, about 700 nm, about 600 nm, about 500 nm, about 400 nm, about 300 nm, about 200 nm, about 150 nm, about 100 nm, about 50 nm, about 30 nm, about 20 nm, about 10 nm, about 5 nm, about 2 nm, or smaller. In some embodiments herein, to further distinguish the different grain size regimes, the term “ultra-fine grain” is used to denote a grain size of greater than about 100 nm and less than about 1000 nm and the term “nanocrystalline grain” is used to denote a grain size of less than or equal to about 100 nm. In one embodiment, the nanocrystalline material may be a polycrystalline material. In another embodiment the nanocrystalline material may be a single crystalline material.
In one embodiment, the grain size may refer to the largest dimension of a grain. The dimension may refer to the diameter, length, width, or height of a grain, depending on the geometry thereof. In one embodiment, the grains may be spherical, cubic, conical, cylindrical, needle-like, or any other suitable geometry.
In one embodiment, the nanocrystalline material may be in the form of particulates. The shape of the particulates may be spherical, cubical, conical, cylindrical, needle-like, irregular, or any other suitable geometry.
In one embodiment, the nanocrystalline material may be a nanocrystalline alloy that may comprise a first metal material and a second metal material. The first and/or second metal material may comprise a first and/or second metal element, respectively. The term “element” herein refers to the chemical symbol that may be found in the Periodic Table. The first metal material may be a metal element. A metal element may include any of the elements in Groups 3-14 of the Periodic Table. In one embodiment, the metal element may be a refractory metal element. In another embodiment, the metal element is a transition metal (any of those in Groups 3-12 of the periodic table). While tungsten is employed to provide the description of several embodiments below, any suitable first metal material may be utilized in the place of tungsten. According to another embodiment, the first metal material may comprise chromium. In another embodiment, the first metal material may comprise at least one of tungsten and chromium.
In one embodiment, the second metal material element may comprise, or be, an activator material, relative to the first metal material. In another embodiment, the second metal material may comprise, or be, a stabilizer material, relative to the first metal material. In one embodiment, the second metal material may comprise a metal element that is the same as, or different from, the first metal material. For example, the metal element of the second metal material may be a transition metal. In one embodiment, the second metal material may comprise Cr, Ti, or both. According to another embodiment, the second metal material may comprise Ni.
The nanocrystalline material may have any value of relative density, depending on the material. Relative density may refer to the ratio between the experimentally measured density of the nanocrystalline material and the theoretical density of the nanocrystalline material.
In one embodiment, the nanocrystalline material may be a bulk nanocrystalline alloy. A bulk nanocrystalline alloy may be a material that is not in the form of a thin film. For example, a bulk nanocrystalline alloy in one embodiment may refer to a material with a smallest dimension of at least about 1 micron—e.g., at least about 10 microns, about 25 microns, about 50 microns, about 75 microns, about 100 microns, about 250 microns, about 500 microns, about 1 mm, about 5 mm, about 10 mm, or larger. In another embodiment, the nanocrystalline alloy is not in the form of a coating.
Stabilization of Nanocrystalline Structure
A nanocrystalline microstructure with a high surface-to-volume ratio may have a large number of interfacial regions or grain boundaries, which may make it unstable. In one embodiment, instability may indicate a high amount of excess energy in the system, and significant grain growth may be observed in pure nanostructured materials even at room temperature. Not to be bound by any particular theory, but this phenomenon may be understood from a thermodynamic viewpoint. The Gibbs free energy, G, is proportional to the grain boundary energy, γ, multiplied by grain boundary area, A. Therefore, the decrease in grain boundary area that occurs as a result of grain growth may bring the system into a lower energy state. This phenomenon, in one embodiment, is illustrated in
dG∝γdA (1)
The high driving force for grain growth may limit further technological applications of pure nanostructured materials because even a small change in grain size over the service lifetime of the material may lead to a dramatic change in the material properties. Additionally, the propensity for grain growth may limit the amount of post-processing a nanostructured material may be subjected to, including consolidation and shape forming.
In one embodiment, two basic approaches may be used to stabilize nanocrystalline materials: a kinetic approach and a thermodynamic approach. The kinetic approach attempts to diminish grain boundary mobility to reduce grain growth. For example, grain boundary mobility may be limited by methods including second phase drag, solute drag, and chemical ordering. These strategies may postpone the time at which grain growth occurs. However, these methods may not reduce the driving force for grain growth. Thus, kinetically stabilized products may experience grain growth and may not provide constant performance throughout a service lifetime.
In contrast, the thermodynamic approach attempts to reduce the grain boundary energy by segregating solute atoms, thus reducing the driving force for grain growth. Not to be bound by any particular theory, but in alloy systems the grain boundary energy, γ, may be described in terms of the solute concentration, cs, by the Gibbs adsorption equation:
∂γ=−RTΓs∂ ln cs, (2)
where T is temperature, R is the gas constant, and Γs is the interfacial excess of the solute atoms. In the case of segregation, Γs>0, and thus γ will decrease with increasing solute concentration, cs. A nanocrystalline alloy may be in a metastable state if γ is close to zero at a specific solute concentration. From Equation (2), the total grain boundary energy is given by:
γ=γ0−Γs(ΔHseg+kT ln X), (3)
where γ0 is the specific grain boundary energy of the pure element, ΔHseg is the segregation enthalpy of solute atoms, k is the Boltzmann constant, and X is the solute concentration in the grain boundary. Stabilization of nanocrystalline material grain size by solute segregation may be conducted for Ni—P alloys, Y—Fe alloys, Nb—Cu alloys, Pd—Zr alloys, and Fe—Zr alloys, among many others.
The new degree of freedom to Gibbs free energy produced by solute segregation is plotted in
Nanocrystalline Tungsten
In one embodiment, nanocrystalline body-centered cubic metals may be desirable because these metals exhibit desirable properties, including localized shearing under high rate loading. The formation of shear bands under high rate loading may be beneficial for a material utilized in a kinetic energy penetrator device because it may allow more energy to be conveyed to the object to be penetrated by reducing the energy that is dissipated as a result of plastic deformation of the penetrator. In one embodiment, tungsten may be desirable as a prospective replacement for depleted uranium in kinetic energy penetrator applications because of its high density and strength. In addition, unlike tungsten with larger grain sizes, nanocrystalline tungsten may exhibit shear bands under high rate loading.
Two methodologies may be employed to manufacture nanocrystalline materials: bottom-up and top-down. The top-down strategy may refine a bulk coarse grain material into the nanoscale regime. The bottom-up method may employ nanosize particles followed by consolidation at high temperature.
One exemplary top-down method for refining the grain size of tungsten is severe plastic deformation (SPD). There are at least two typical SPD techniques: equal-channel-angular-pressing (ECAP) and high-pressure torsion (HPT). An ECAP process may result in a tungsten grain size of a few microns by initiating dynamic recrystallization and grain growth as a result of the high processing temperature of around 1000° C. Therefore, a warm rolling process may follow an ECAP process to obtain a grain size in the ultra-fine grain regime. Another SPD processing method, HPT, applies high pressure and torsion to a disk of tungsten. The resulting plastic strain may yield a material with a grain size of about 100 nm. These SPD techniques may produce an ultra-fine grain size tungsten that may be perfectly plastic with no strain hardening, may exhibit a reduced strain rate sensitivity, and/or may exhibit localized shearing under high rate loading.
In some instances, problems may exist with the use of the SPD technique to produce ultra-fine grain size tungsten (or even finer grains). First, a large scale product is not produced through the SPD technique. In one embodiment, the SPD technique utilizes large amounts of energy per unit volume of material processed. Also, the fine grain size of the produced material may be lost if the material is subjected to subsequent processing (e.g., shape forming). Additionally, the SPD technique may not provide a scalable way to precisely control grain size, and thus may not produce a material with the specific grain size needed for a specific application. In one embodiment, the SPD technique does not reduce the driving force for grain growth.
In one embodiment of the bottom-up method, particles containing nanosize grains of the material may be synthesized, and then the particles may be consolidated. Thus, in one embodiment, this method herein may be referred to as a “two-step” process. The consolidation may be achieved by a sintering process. However, materials produced through the bottom-up method may exhibit poor ductility as a result of volume defects that are not removed during the consolidation step. These volume defects may include residual porosity, poor inter-particle bonding, and impurity contamination.
Bottom-up processes may be utilized to produce nanocrystalline tungsten. These processes may include the production of nanocrystalline tungsten powders synthesized through mechanical working, including ball milling and/or high energy milling. In some instances, although tungsten with nanosized grains of about 5 nm to about 15 nm may be produced, the resulting nanostructure may become unstable and may be susceptible to thermally activated grain growth. In one embodiment, to produce a tungsten material with a stable nanostructure, additive elements may be employed to reduce susceptibility to thermally activated grain growth. As described elsewhere herein, additive elements in one embodiment may be a stabilizer, an activator, or both, with respect to tungsten in the nanocrystalline alloy.
Elements for Stabilizing Nanocrystalline Tungsten
In selecting elements for stabilizing a tungsten material with nanosized grains, ΔHseg may be important. As shown in Eq. (3), elements with a large value of ΔHseg may reduce grain boundary energy. The ΔHseg of a solution may be directly related to the elastic strain energy of the solution, and the elastic strain energy of a solution may scale with atomic radius mismatch. Therefore, in one embodiment, as atomic radius mismatch increases, the grain boundary energy may be reduced.
As shown in
In considering the segregation strength of tungsten alloys with positive heats of mixing, the elements Ti, V, Sc, and Cr may have good segregation strength with respect to their enthalpies of mixing. In one embodiment, vanadium exhibits a low heat of mixing, and thus may not be desirable for certain applications.
The thermal stability of an alloy may be determined and/or confirmed by any suitable techniques. For example, in one embodiment, the thermal stability of a W—Ti alloy may be confirmed with x-ray diffraction (XRD) data collected in-situ at different temperatures. The alloy sample may already have been annealed at various temperatures, for various predetermined periods of time.
Activated Sintering of Tungsten
Because tungsten has a high melting point of 3422° C., tungsten may be employed as a refractory metal material. In one embodiment, even with sintering techniques, high temperatures of about 2400° C. to about 2800° C. may be needed to obtain a full density sintered tungsten material. Small amounts of additional elements may be added to tungsten to enhance the sintering kinetics, and in turn lower the sintering temperature. The additive elements may be metal elements, including any of those aforedescribed. In one embodiment, the additive elements may be at least one of Pd, Pt, Ni, Co and Fe. These additive metal elements may surround the tungsten particles and provide a relatively high transport diffusion path for the tungsten, thereby reducing the activation energy of tungsten diffusion. In one embodiment, this technique is referred to as activated sintering.
Activated sintering may be explained by different mechanisms. It may be ascribed to dislocation climb, the transfer of electrons from the additive element to the d-orbital of tungsten, and an enhancement of the grain boundary diffusion rate. The effect of additive elements that are transition metal elements on the sintering kinetics of tungsten are shown in
Sintering Kinetics
While additive elements may be desirable in some instances, too much of an additive element may hinder the densification of tungsten. Not to be bound by any particular theory, but this may suggest that activated sintering of tungsten may be a diffusion controlled process. The activation energies of the additive elements Fe, Co, Ni, and Pd, are 480 kJ/mol, 370 kJ/mol, 280 kJ/mol, and 200 kJ/mol, respectively.
The activation energy of pure tungsten sintering is about 380-460 kJ/mol. Not to be bound by any theory, but the value suggests that the mechanism of sintering of pure tungsten in the initial stage may be grain boundary diffusion because the activation energy of pure tungsten sintering is comparable to that of grain boundary diffusion of tungsten as shown in Table 1.
Activation Energy for Densification
Sintering may be a complex process that includes the change of microstructure as a result of several different diffusion mechanisms. In one embodiment, this complex sintering process may be distinguished into three stages based on the evolution of the microstructure: initial, intermediate and final stage. The initial stage may begin at a low temperature when necks are created between particles. The necks may be created through surface diffusion and may result in a small increase in density. The initial stage may correlate to less than 3% linear shrinkage. The intermediate stage may produce considerable densification. The densification in the intermediate stage may be up to a relative density of 93%. During the final stage, isolated pores may be formed and then removed. In the final stage, volume diffusion may be predominant.
The sintering behavior may be explained by geometric models. While these models may be in line with experimental results in some cases, slight deviations from the geometric models, such as the use of non-spherical particles or a variety of particle sizes, may make the results of the geometric models unreliable. Moreover, geometric models based on the initial sintering process may not be accurate beyond the first 5% of linear shrinkage. In addition, the actual evolution of the microstructure of powder compacts may be different from the predictions of geometric models. As a result, it may be difficult to quantitatively predict sintering kinetics.
The entire sintering process may be described in an approach that focuses on more than the three sintering stages. To evaluate the precise activation energy of the sintering process, a generalized sintering equation may be utilized. Not to be bound by any particular theory, but the instantaneous densification rate during sintering may be represented with temperature-dependent, grain-size-dependent, and density-dependent terms, as shown in Eq. (4).
where ρ is the bulk density, d is the grain or particle size, γ is the surface energy, V is the molar volume, R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, Q is the activation energy, and ƒ(ρ) is a function only of density. C is a constant and A is a material parameter that is not related to d, T, or ρ. Finally, the diffusion mechanism such as grain boundary diffusion or volume diffusion, determines the value of n. In isotropic shrinkage situations, ρ may be obtained based on the simple mathematic relationship and the shrinkage data:
Upon taking the logarithm of Eq. 4, the following equation is obtained:
Therefore, the activation energy, Q, may be evaluated through the slope by plotting In(Tdρ/dt) versus 1/T at a constant ρ and d. Moreover, Equation (6) produces a different Q at different density values.
Thermodynamic Stabilization of Tungsten Alloys Through Segregation
In one embodiment, additive alloying elements may be employed: a stabilizer element and/or an activator element. The stabilizer element may thermodynamically stabilize nanocrystalline tungsten by segregation in the grain boundaries. This segregation may reduce the grain boundary energy, and in turn may reduce the driving force for grain growth. In one embodiment, the nanocrystalline tungsten alloy may be thermodynamically stable or substantially thermodynamically stable at temperatures greater than or equal to about 1000° C.—e.g., greater than or equal to about 1050° C., about 1000° C., about 1150° C., about 1200° C., about 1250° C., about 1300° C., about 1350° C., about 1400° C., about 1450° C., about 1500° C., or higher.
The activator element may enhance the sintering kinetics of tungsten by providing a high diffusion path for tungsten atoms. As a result, the sintering temperature in one embodiment may be less than or equal to about 1500° C.—e.g., less than or equal to about 1450° C., about 1400° C., about 1350° C., about 1300° C., about 1250° C., about 1200° C., about 1150° C., about 1100° C., about 1050° C., or lower. In one embodiment, the sintering temperature may be about 1000° C. The reduction of the sintering temperature may allow sintering to take place in the temperature range where the nanostructure of the nanocrystalline tungsten is thermodynamically stable. In one embodiment, the sintering temperature may be affected by the heating rate employed.
Stabilizer Elements
The stabilizer element may be any element capable of reducing the grain boundary energy of the sintered material, thereby reducing the driving force for grain growth. Generally, the stabilizer element may exhibit a positive heat of mixing with the sintered material. In one embodiment, the stabilizer element may be a metal element, which may be any of the aforedescribed metal elements.
The stabilizer element may be present in an amount of greater than or equal to about 2.5 at % —e.g., greater than or equal to about 5 at %, about 7.5 at %, about 10 at %, about 12.5 at %, about 15 at %, about 17.5 at %, about 20 at %, about 25 at %, about 30 at %, about 35 at %, about 40 at %, about 45 at %, or greater. In one embodiment, the stabilizer element may be present in an amount of from about 2.5 at % to about 45 at %—e.g., about 5 at % to about 40 at %, about 7.5 at % to about 35 at %, about 10 at % to about 30 at %, about 12.5 at % to about 25 at %, or about 15 at % to about 20 at %, etc. In one embodiment, the stabilizer element may be present in an amount of about 2.5 at %, about 5 at %, about 7.5 at %, about 10 at %, about 12.5 at %, about 15 at %, about 17.5 at %, about 20 at %, about 25 at %, about 30 at %, about 35 at %, about 40 at %, or about 45 at %.
Activator Elements
The activator element may be any element capable of enhancing the sintering kinetics of the sintered material. In one embodiment of activated sintering, the activator element may act as a fast carrier path for the diffusion of tungsten. As a result, in one embodiment the selection of an activator element may be based on two conditions. First, the solubility of the activator element in tungsten and segregation at the interparticle interfaces may be low. Additionally, the activator element should exhibit relatively high solubility for tungsten, allowing the activator element to act as a fast diffusion path for tungsten atoms. Second, the diffusion rate of tungsten in a phase rich in an activator element may be relatively high. Additionally, the diffusion rate of tungsten in an activator element rich phase should be higher than the diffusion rate of the tungsten in itself. The term “rich” with respect to the content of an element in a phase refers, in one embodiment, to a content of the element in the phase of at least about 50 at %—e.g., at least about 60 at %, about 70 at %, about 80 at %, about 90 at %, about 99%, or higher. The term “phase” in one embodiment refers to a state of matter. For example, in one embodiment a phase may refer to a phase shown on a phase diagram.
In one embodiment, tungsten is soluble in the activator element. In another embodiment, the solubility of the tungsten in the activator element increases with increasing temperature. In one embodiment, the melting temperature of the activator element may be less than the melting temperature of the tungsten.
Generally, the amount of an activator may be minimized so that the quantity available for interaction with the stabilizer element is reduced. In one embodiment, the activator element may be present in an amount greater than or equal to about 0.15 at %—e.g., greater than or equal to or about 0.3 at %, about 0.5 at %, about 1 at %, about 3 at %, about 5 at %, about 8 at %, about 10 at %, about 13 at %, about 15 at %, about 18 at %, about 20 at %, about 23 at %, about 25 at %, about 30 at %, about 35 at %, about 40 at %, about 45 at %, or greater. In one embodiment, the activator element may be present in an amount of about 0.15 at % to about 45 at %—e.g., about 0.3 at % to about 40 at %, about 0.5 at % to about 35 at %, about 1 at % to about 30 at %, about 3 at % to about 25 at %, about 5 at % to about 23 at %, about 8 at % to about 20 at %, about 10 at % to about 18 at %, or about 13 at % to about 15 at %, etc. In one embodiment, the activator element may be present in an amount of about 0.15 at %, about 0.3 at %, about 0.5 at %, about 1 at %, about 3 at %, about 5 at %, about 8 at %, about 10 at %, about 13 at %, about 15 at %, about 18 at %, about 20 at %, about 23 at %, about 25 at %, about 30 at %, about 35 at %, about 40 at %, or about 45 at %.
In one embodiment, the activator element may be a metal element, which may be any of the aforedescribed metal elements. In one embodiment the activator element may be at least one of Pd, Pt, Ni, Co, and Fe.
In one embodiment, the activator element may also be the stabilizer element. As shown in Eq. (3), the activator element that provides the largest ΔHseg may produce the largest stabilization effect, and ΔHseg may be related to three factors: atomic radius mismatch (elastic strain energy), chemical interaction and grain boundary energy difference. The atomic radius mismatch between Ni and tungsten is bigger than the mismatch between Pd and tungsten. Therefore, Ni may be a better element for stabilizing tungsten if only elastic strain energy is considered. In one embodiment, Ni or Pd may act as both the stabilizer element and the activator element, producing W—Ni and W—Pd nanocrystalline alloys.
In another embodiment, the stabilizer element may also be the activator element. The use of a single element both as the stabilizer and activator elements has the added benefit of removing the need to consider the interaction between the activator and the stabilizer. In one embodiment the element that may be utilized as both the activator and stabilizer element may be a metal element, which may be any of the aforedescribed metal elements. In one embodiment at least one of Ti, V, Cr, and Sc, or combinations thereof, may be utilized as both the activator and stabilizer element. In another embodiment Cr, Ti, or both may be utilized as both the activator and stabilizer element.
In the case of both Ti and V, a solid solution is formed with tungsten at the sintering temperature (below 1500° C.), as shown in the phase diagrams in
Interaction of Activator and Stabilizer
When one element cannot act as both the stabilizer and the activator, two elements may be employed. The interaction between the two elements may be accounted for to ensure that the activator and stabilizer roles are properly fulfilled. For example, when the activator and the stabilizer form an intermetallic compound each of the elements may be prevented from fulfilling their designated role. As a result, activator and stabilizer combinations with the ability to form intermetallic compounds at the expected sintering temperatures should be avoided at least in some instances. The potential for the formation of intermetallic compounds between two elements may be analyzed with phase diagrams.
The amount of each additive may be important in determining the potential for the formation of an intermetallic phase based on the phase diagram. For example, as shown in
The ternary phase diagrams of the activator-stabilizer combination with tungsten indicate that a liquid phase may be formed with some stabilizer-activator combinations. In one embodiment, the stabilizer-activator combinations that may form a liquid phase may be Ni—Ti, Sc—Ni, Sc—Pd, and Cr—Pd.
The ternary phase diagram for W—Ti—Ni, as shown in
Liquid Phase Sintering
In at least one embodiment of liquid phase sintering, the alloy contains more than one component above the solidus line of the components at the expected processing temperature, and a liquid phase is present at the expected processing temperature. The densification rate may be faster for liquid phase sintering, compared to solid state sintering, due to the high diffusivity of atoms in the liquid phase. Industrial sintering may generally be performed in the presence of a liquid phase due to cost and productivity advantages. Over 70% of sintered materials may be processed using liquid phase sintering techniques.
In one embodiment a W—Ni—Fe alloy system may be sintered by liquid phase sintering techniques to produce a material employed in applications such as kinetic energy penetrators. A temperature above 1460° C. may be applied for liquid phase sintering of 98 wt % W-1 wt % Ni-1 wt % Fe. A liquid phase may emerge at this concentration combination of Ni and Fe, as shown in
In some instances, liquid phase sintering techniques may exhibit concomitant microstructural coarsening. The inclusion of a stabilizer, such as Ti, in a nanocrystalline material may prevent microstructural coarsening. The occurrence of liquid phase sintering may be confirmed through scanning electron microscope (SEM) images at different temperatures throughout the sintering process. In one embodiment, the liquid phase sintering process may be the result of a pore filling mechanism. A pore filling mechanism and successful liquid phase sintering may be detected by the presence of liquid filled branches surrounding the sintered particles, as shown in
Production of Sintered Nanocrystalline Alloys
In one embodiment, a process for the production of a nanocrystalline alloy includes sintering a plurality of nanocrystalline particulates. The nanocrystalline particulates may include a first metal material, such as tungsten, and a second metal material, such as an activator element. The nanocrystalline particulates may include a non-equilibrium phase where the second metal material is dissolved in the first metal material. According to one embodiment, the non-equilibrium phase may be a supersaturated phase. The term “supersaturated phase” is described further below. The non-equilibrium phase may undergo decomposition during the sintering of the nanocrystalline particulates. The sintering of the nanocrystalline particulates may cause the formation of a phase rich in the second metal material at at least one of the surface and grain boundaries of the nanocrystalline particulates. The formation of the phase rich in the second metal material may be the result of the decomposition of the non-equilibrium phase during the sintering. The phase rich in the second metal material may act as a fast diffusion path for the first metal material, enhancing the sintering kinetics and accelerating the rate of sintering of the nanocrystalline particulates. According to one embodiment, the decomposition of the non-equilibrium phase during the sintering of the nanocrystalline particulates accelerates the rate of sintering of the nanocrystalline particulates. The nanocrystalline alloy produced as a result of the sintering process may be a bulk nanocrystalline alloy.
In one embodiment, the second metal material may have a lower melting temperature than the first metal material. In another embodiment, the first metal material may be soluble in the second metal material. In one embodiment, the solubility of the first metal material in the second metal material may increase with increasing temperature. In another embodiment, the diffusivity of the first metal material in a phase rich in the second metal material is greater than the diffusivity of the first metal material in itself. Specifically, the first metal material and second metal material may include the elements described above in the Nanocrystalline Alloy section.
In one embodiment, the sintered nanocrystalline alloy may exhibit a relative density of greater than or equal to about 75%—e.g., at least about 80%, about 85%, about 90%, about 91%, about 92%, about 93%, about 94%, about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 99.9%. The term “relative density” is already described above. In another embodiment, the relative density of the sintered material may be about 100%. According to one embodiment the sintered material may be fully dense. As utilized herein, the term “fully dense” or “full density” refers to a material with a relative density of at least 98%—e.g., at least about 98%, about 99%, about 99.5%, or higher. The density of the sintered material may impact other material properties of the sintered material. Thus, by controlling the density of the sintered material the other material properties may be controlled.
In one embodiment, the grain size of the sintered nanocrystalline alloy may be in the nanometer range—e.g., smaller than or equal to about 1000 nm: e.g., less than or equal to about 900 nm, about 800 nm, about 700 nm, about 600 nm, about 500 nm, about 450 nm, about 400 nm, about 350 nm, about 300 nm, about 250 nm, about 200 nm, about 150 nm, about 125 nm, about 100 nm, about 75 nm, about 50 nm, about 40 nm, about 30 nm, about 25 nm, about 20 nm, about 15 nm, about 10 nm, or smaller. In some embodiments herein, to further distinguish the different grain size regimes, the term “ultra-fine grain” is used to denote a grain size of greater than about 100 nm and less than about 1000 nm and the term “nanocrystalline grain” is used to denote a grain size of less than or equal to about 100 nm. In one embodiment, the grain size of the sintered nanocrystalline alloy may be about 1 nm to about 1000 nm—e.g., about 10 nm to about 900 nm, about 15 nm to about 800 nm, about 20 nm to about 700 nm, about 25 nm to about 600 nm, about 30 nm to about 500 nm, about 40 nm to about 450 nm, about 50 nm to about 400 nm, about 75 nm to about 350 nm, about 100 nm to about 300 nm, about 125 nm to about 250 nm, or about 150 nm to about 200 nm, etc. In one embodiment, the grain size of the sintered nanocrystalline alloy may be smaller than the grain size of a sintered material that includes the first metal material in the absence of the second metal material. In one embodiment, the grain size of the sintered nanocrystalline alloy may be about the same as the grain size of a sintered material that includes the first metal material in the absence of the second metal material. In one embodiment, the grain size of the sintered nanocrystalline alloy may be larger than or the same as the grain size of a sintered material that includes the first metal material in the absence of the second metal material. In one embodiment, the sintering mechanism described herein may be useful for the production of ultra-fine and nanocrystalline sintered materials due to the ability of second phases and alloying elements to maintain ultra-fine and nanocrystalline structures during heat treatment.
The sintering conditions for the production of the sintered material may be any appropriate conditions. According to one embodiment, a high sintering temperature may be employed for a short sintering time to produce the sintered material. Alternatively, a comparably lower sintering temperature may be employed for a longer sintering time to produce a sintered material that is densified to the same degree. In one embodiment, extended sintering times may result in an undesired increase in grain size. The sintering may be a pressureless sintering process. The sintering mechanism described herein allows the production of fully dense sintered ultra-fine and nanocrystalline materials even in the absence of external pressure applied during the sintering process.
Process for Making Nanocrystalline Particulates
One embodiment provides a method for making nanocrystalline tungsten particulates, which method involves mechanically working a powder including a plurality of tungsten particulates and a second metal material. In one embodiment, the second metal material may be an activator element or a stabilizer element. The mechanical working may be a ball-milling process or a high-energy ball milling process. In an exemplary ball-milling process, a tungsten carbide or steel milling vial may be employed, with a ball-to-powder ratio of about 2:1 to about 5:1, and a steric acid process control agent content of about 0.01 wt % to about 3 wt %. In another embodiment, the mechanical working may be carried out in the presence of a steric acid process control agent content of about 1 wt %, about 2 wt %, or about 3 wt %. According to another embodiment, the mechanical working is carried out in the absence of a process control agent. In one embodiment, the ball milling may be performed under any conditions sufficient to produce a nanocrystalline particulate comprising a supersaturated phase.
According to another embodiment, any appropriate method of mechanical powder milling may be employed to mechanically work a powder and form nanocrystalline particulates. In one embodiment, a high-energy ball mill of attritor mill may be employed. In other embodiments, other types of mills may be employed, including shaker mills and planetary mills. In general, any mechanical milling method that produces a mechanical alloying effect may be employed.
The average grain size of the nanocrystalline particulates may be calculated by peak broadening measurements obtained through x-ray diffraction (XRD). As shown in
In one embodiment, the ball milling may be conducted for a time of greater than or equal to about 2 hours—e.g., greater than or equal to about 4 hours, about 6 hours, about 8 hours, about 10 hours, about 12 hours, about 15 hours, about 20 hours, about 25 hours, about 30 hours, or about 35 hours. In one embodiment the ball-milling may be conducted for a time of about 1 hour to about 35 hours—e.g., about 2 hours to about 30 hours, about 4 hours to about 25 hours, about 6 hours to about 20 hours, about 8 hours to about 15 hours, or about 10 hours to about 12 hours. If the milling time is too long, the tungsten powder may be contaminated by the milling vial material. The amount of the second metal material that is dissolved in the tungsten material may also increase with increasing milling time. In one embodiment, after the ball-milling step, a phase rich in the second metal material may be observed.
In one embodiment the grain size of the produced nanocrystalline particulates may be smaller than about 1000 nm—e.g., smaller than or equal to about 900 nm, about 800 nm, about 700 nm, about 600 nm, about 500 nm, about 400 nm, about 300 nm, about 200 nm, about 150 nm, about 100 nm, about 50 nm, about 30 nm, about 20 nm, about 10 nm, about 5 nm, about 2 nm, or smaller. In one embodiment the grain size of the produced nanocrystalline particulates may be about 1 nm to about 1000 nm—e.g., about 10 nm to about 900 nm, about 15 nm to about 800 nm, about 20 nm to about 700 nm, about 25 nm to about 600 nm, about 30 nm to about 500 nm, about 40 nm to about 450 nm, about 50 nm to about 400 nm, about 75 nm to about 350 nm, about 100 nm to about 300 nm, about 125 nm to about 250 nm, or about 150 nm to about 200 nm, etc. In another embodiment, the nanocrystalline particulates may have a grain size of about 7 nm to about 8 nm.
In one embodiment, the nanocrystalline particulates are polycrystalline—e.g., the nanocrystalline particulates contain a plurality of grains. In another embodiment, the nanocrystalline particulates are single crystalline materials—e.g., at least one of the nanocrystalline particulates contains a single grain.
In at least one embodiment, ball-milling of the tungsten powder and the activator element may produce a non-equilibrium phase. The non-equilibrium phase may contain a solid solution. The non-equilibrium phase may be a supersaturated phase. A “supersaturated phase” may be a non-equilibrium phase that includes the activator element forcibly dissolved in the tungsten in an amount that exceeds the amount of activator element that could be otherwise dissolved in an equilibrium tungsten phase. In one embodiment, the supersaturated phase may be the only phase present after the ball-milling process. In another embodiment, a second phase rich in the activator element may be present after ball milling.
In at least one embodiment, the sintering behavior of the particulate material may be observed by heating a compact of the particulate material under a constant force. A change in the length of the compact indicates sintering and densification. The force may be of any value, depending on the application. In one embodiment, the constant force applied to the compact throughout the heating process is about 0.05 N or about 0.1 N. The sintering temperature of the particulate material may be defined as the temperature at which the change in the length of the compact is 1%.
According to one embodiment, the sintering may include a liquid phase sintering mechanism.
Master Sintering Curve
The integral of instantaneous linear shrinkage rate during sintering can be represented as follows:
where γ is the surface energy, Ω the atomic volume, R the gas constant, T the temperature, G the average grain size, t time, Γ the parameter which relate the driving force, mean diffusion distance, and other geometric features of the microstructures, D0=(Dv)0 and n=3 for volume diffusion, and D0=(δDg)0 and n=4 for grain-boundary diffusion. With the slight rearrangement, 7 is divided into two parts:
which comprises all microstructural and materials properties except for activation energy.
which relies only on Q and heating time-temperature profile. The activation energy can be estimated by computing 9; the correct activation energy, Q, will make all of the data computed through 9 collapse onto a single curve. For assessing the sintering activation energy of nanocrystalline W—Cr 15 at %, their heating profiles with 5, 10, 15, 20° C./min shown in
Materials and Methods
In one example, a tungsten powder with a particulate size of about 1-5 um and a purity of 99.9% is utilized as the first metal material.
In another example a high-energy ball mill is utilized to form nanocrystalline tungsten through mechanical milling. The ball milling may be conducted in an argon atmosphere in a glove box. The ball-milled material was formed in to green cylindrical disk compacts with a 6 mm diameter and about 3-4 mm height with an initial density of about 11.1-11.2 g/cm3 by compacting at a pressure of 360 MPa.
A thermodilatometer may be used to measure the change of dimensions of the sample according to temperature. The thermodilatometer may be operated with an atmosphere of N2/H2 (4%) forming gas, Ar/H2 (3%), or flowing argon gas. The force on the pellet subjected to sintering for the purposes of measuring the change in sample dimensions was 100 mN.
In one example the sintering may be conducted in an atmosphere containing hydrogen, a vacuum, air, or an inert gas atmosphere. The sintering atmosphere may affect the sinterability of tungsten powder. Hydrogen-containing atmospheres may generally be used for sintering tungsten powder. A hydrogen containing atmosphere may produce a relatively high density material. Vacuum atmospheres may produce a sintered material with a modest density. In some instances, limited or no densification may be detected when an argon sintering environment is employed. Not to be bound by any particular theory, but a volatile vapor phase oxide hydrate of the tungsten particulates (WO2(OH)2) may develop during sintering in a vacuum or argon atmosphere, and the adsorption of the vapor phase on the surface of the tungsten particulates may result in low sinterability.
In one example, non-isothermal heating techniques may be used in the sintering process. For example, a constant rate of heating (CRH) technique may be employed. In one embodiment constant heating rates of 1 K/min, 3 K/min, 5 K/min, 7 K/min, 10 K/min, 12 K/min, 15 K/min or 20 K/min may be used. In another example an isothermal heating method may be employed.
The following non-limiting experimental examples were produced and analyzed.
A tungsten powder containing 20 at % Cr was ball milled to produce nanocrystalline particulates. The nanocrystalline particulates were analyzed after 6 hours, 10 hours and 15 hours of ball milling. As shown in
When the W-20 at % Cr nanocrystalline particulates were sintered using an isothermal process at 1300° C., densification of greater than 90%, specifically about 91%, was achieved, as shown in
The transition between an initial low density sintering mechanism and a second higher density intermediate sintering mechanism may be observed in
The formation of a Cr rich phase at the surface of the particulates of the W-20 at % Cr material after heating to 1400° C. is depicted in
A tungsten powder containing 15 at % Cr was ball milled to produce nanocrystalline particulates. The nanocrystalline particulates were analyzed after 20 and 30 hours of ball milling. The W-15 at % Cr nanocrystalline particulates demonstrated the XRD peak broadening and peak shift characteristics of a supersaturated nanocrystalline phase, as shown in
The nanocrystalline particulates exhibited improved densification behavior upon sintering compared to W-20 at % Cr nanocrystalline particulates that were ball milled for 10 hours, and the nanocrystalline particulates that were ball milled for 30 hours demonstrated slightly improved densification performance in comparison to the nanocrystalline particulates that were ball milled for 20 hours, as shown in
The sintering activation energy of the 15 at % Cr nanocrystalline particulates was determined for a variety of heating rates, including 3 K/min, 5 K/min, 10 K/min, 15 K/min, and 20 K/min, and the result is shown in
A tungsten powder containing 20 at % Ti was ball milled to form nanocrystalline particulates and then sintered. The nanocrystalline particulates exhibited inferior sintering behavior compared to pure tungsten nanocrystalline particulates and W-20 at % Cr nanocrystalline particulates, as demonstrated in
In this example, tungsten powder mixtures containing Cr in an amount of about 5 at %, about 10 at %, about 20 at %, about 30 at %, and about 40 at % were ball milled for 10 hours and then sintered at 1300° C. The shrinkage of the samples, as shown in
In this example, a W—Ti 20 at %-Cr 5 at % powder mixture was ball milled and then sintered by heating to 1300° C. The sintering behavior indicates that the Cr acts as an activator even in the presence of Ti, as shown in
In this example, a W—Cr 15 at % mixture was ball milled to produce a supersaturated powder in which Cr is fully dissolved in W, with an average particle diameter of about 1 micron and an average grain size of about 13 nm, as shown in
The powder was heated to 1100° C., and a Cr-rich phase precipitated from the supersaturated W-rich phase and formed small Cr domains on the surface of the particles, as shown in
In this example, Cr—Ni 5 at % and Cr—Ni 15 at % samples were ball milled and then sintered.
In this example, W—Cr 15 at % was ball milled for 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 20 hours. As shown in
A series of comparative examples were investigated to determine the independent effect of (i) nanocrystallinity and (ii) alloy supersaturation of the powder on sintering behavior. The relative density change of the comparative examples as a function of temperature is shown in
Pure nanocrystalline W (nc-W): pure tungsten was mechanically milled in the SPEX 8000 high-energy mill for 20 hours using tungsten carbide media and a ball-to-powder ratio of 5 to 1, with 1 wt % steric acid as a process control agent. The resulting sample had a grain size of 10 nm as revealed by Rietveld refinement but no Cr—this sample met condition (i) but not (ii). This powder was then compacted into 6 mm diameter and 3-4 mm high cylindrical disks of 0.62 relative density.
Nanocrystalline W with 15 at % Cr (not dissolved) (nc-W+15 at % Cr): powder of pure Cr was added to pure nanocrystalline W, produced by milling for 20 hours with a dry mixing method; 15 at % Cr was mixed with nanocrystalline W without milling or mechanical alloying, for approximately 15 minutes. The resulting sample comprised W with a grain size of 10 nm as revealed by Rietveld refinement, and contained chromium, but not in an alloyed or supersaturated condition; it met condition (i) but not (ii). This powder was then compacted into 6 mm diameter and 3-4 mm high cylindrical disks of 0.63 relative density.
W-15 at % Cr unalloyed and without nanostructure (W+15 at % Cr): 15 at % Cr was dry-mixed with W for approximately 15 minutes without mechanical alloying or milling. The resulting sample was a mixture of W-15 at % Cr, but had no nanoscale structure or supersaturation; it met neither condition (i) nor (ii). This powder was then compacted into 6 mm diameter and 3-4 mm high cylindrical disks of 0.67 relative density.
Supersaturated W-15 at % Cr (W(Cr)): W-15 at % Cr powders were mechanically milled in a SPEX 8000 high-energy mill for 30 minutes using tungsten carbide media without any process control agent. The resultant powder was then sealed in a quartz tube, first evacuated to 10−6 Torr using a turbo pump, and then backfilled with high-purity argon gas to 120 Torr. The sealed powder was annealed in a furnace that could be controlled to within ±3° C. at 1400° C. for 20 hours and then quenched. The resulting powder was a supersaturated W(Cr) solution, but with a coarse grain size in excess of one micron; it met condition (ii) but not (i). This tungsten solid solution powder was then compacted into 6 mm diameter and 2-3 mm high cylindrical disks of 0.65 relative density.
Pure Cr: Pure chromium powder was compacted into 6 mm diameter and 3-4 mm high cylindrical disks of 0.67 relative density.
Table 1 describes a number of comparative examples of W-alloys that were subjected to liquid phase and activated sintering processes.
All literature and similar material cited in this application, including, but not limited to, patents, patent applications, articles, books, treatises, and web pages, regardless of the format of such literature and similar materials, are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety. In the event that one or more of the incorporated literature and similar materials differs from or contradicts this application, including but not limited to defined terms, term usage, described techniques, or the like, this application controls.
While the present teachings have been described in conjunction with various embodiments and examples, it is not intended that the present teachings be limited to such embodiments or examples. On the contrary, the present teachings encompass various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as will be appreciated by those of skill in the art.
While various inventive embodiments have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the function and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the inventive embodiments described herein. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the inventive teachings is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize many equivalents to the specific inventive embodiments described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, inventive embodiments may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. Inventive embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, kit, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, kits, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the inventive scope of the present disclosure.
All definitions, as defined and used herein, should be understood to control over dictionary definitions, definitions in documents incorporated by reference, and/or ordinary meanings of the defined terms.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.” Any ranges cited herein are inclusive.
The terms “substantially” and “about” used throughout this Specification are used to describe and account for small fluctuations. For example, they may refer to less than or equal to ±5%, such as less than or equal to ±2%, such as less than or equal to ±1%, such as less than or equal to ±0.5%, such as less than or equal to ±0.2%, such as less than or equal to ±0.1%, such as less than or equal to ±0.05%.
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, i.e., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Multiple elements listed with “and/or” should be construed in the same fashion, i.e., “one or more” of the elements so conjoined. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B”, when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” may refer, in one embodiment, to A only (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B only (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements); etc.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, i.e., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (i.e. “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or “exactly one of.” “Consisting essentially of,” when used in the claims, shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “at least one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) may refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.
As used herein “at %” refers to atomic percent and “wt %” refers to weight percent. However, in certain embodiments when “at %” is utilized the values described may also describe “wt %.” For example, if “20 at %” is described in one embodiment, in other embodiments the same description may refer to “20 wt %.” As a result, all “at %” values should be understood to also refer to “wt %” in some instances, and all “wt %” values should be understood to refer to “at %” in some instances.
In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” “composed of,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, i.e., to mean including but not limited to. Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.
The claims should not be read as limited to the described order or elements unless stated to that effect. It should be understood that various changes in form and detail may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. All embodiments that come within the spirit and scope of the following claims and equivalents thereto are claimed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/214,282, filed on Mar. 14, 2014, and entitled “Sintered Nanocrystalline Alloys,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/784,743, filed on Mar. 14, 2013, and entitled “Sintered Nanocrystalline Alloys,” each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. HDTRA1-11-1-0062 awarded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), and Grant No. W911NF-09-1-0422 awarded by the Army Research Office (ARO). The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3479161 | Evans | Nov 1969 | A |
3904383 | Murphy | Sep 1975 | A |
4822415 | Dorfman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4867806 | Shiina | Sep 1989 | A |
4909840 | Schlump | Mar 1990 | A |
4944800 | Kolaska | Jul 1990 | A |
5024813 | Nishiyama | Jun 1991 | A |
5207821 | Ikenoue | May 1993 | A |
5395422 | Schulz | Mar 1995 | A |
5425822 | Hidaka | Jun 1995 | A |
5590387 | Schmidt | Dec 1996 | A |
5897962 | Houck | Apr 1999 | A |
5984996 | Gonsalves et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989491 | Isomoto et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010580 | Dandliker | Jan 2000 | A |
6171410 | Kojima et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6277326 | Vecchio et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6489043 | Deevi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7004853 | Deshmukh | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7416697 | Woodfield et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7708974 | Yadav | May 2010 | B2 |
7955448 | Terao et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8174851 | Elferich | May 2012 | B2 |
8257512 | Branagan et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8287665 | Urata et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8414712 | Yoshizawa et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
10407757 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20020088508 | Holzl | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030101891 | Amick | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030183306 | Hehmann | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040045402 | Boily | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040253136 | Shamblen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050084407 | Myrick | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060121332 | He | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060127266 | Miura et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060153728 | Schoenung et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070293348 | Hocknell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080223175 | Lunk et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090068055 | Sreedhara et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100097171 | Urata et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100189910 | Belashchenko | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100230010 | Yoshizawa et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251921 | Siddle et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110265757 | Bishop et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120021221 | Miyoshi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120207640 | Harrigan, Jr. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130248754 | Sakuma et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140271325 | Schuh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140348203 | Murdoch et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150147225 | Lee et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160155566 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160223307 | Bray | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170067136 | Hussein et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170080498 | Burrow | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170234663 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170252807 | Lund et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170297112 | Burrow | Oct 2017 | A9 |
20180169759 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180363106 | Amram et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190300986 | Graetz et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200002791 | Schuh et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86107901 | May 1987 | CN |
1070431 | Mar 1993 | CN |
1498287 | May 2004 | CN |
1685071 | Oct 2005 | CN |
101081434 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101223108 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101343708 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101423912 | May 2009 | CN |
101423912 | May 2009 | CN |
101636515 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101796207 | Aug 2010 | CN |
102071346 | May 2011 | CN |
103028149 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103422002 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103028148 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104313391 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104419846 | Mar 2015 | CN |
104911380 | Sep 2015 | CN |
105063394 | Nov 2015 | CN |
102888530 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105112832 | Dec 2015 | CN |
105238954 | Jan 2016 | CN |
105603230 | May 2016 | CN |
2927333 | Oct 2015 | EP |
S62-44526 | Feb 1987 | JP |
H02-129329 | May 1990 | JP |
H05-222481 | Aug 1993 | JP |
H06-212202 | Aug 1994 | JP |
H09-157048 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H10-152701 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2004-131822 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2006-052430 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2007-515551 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2010-209417 | Sep 2010 | JP |
4923498 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2012-192016 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013-185162 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2014-517875 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2014-216074 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2016-194095 | Nov 2016 | JP |
100570551 | Apr 2006 | KR |
100784992 | Dec 2007 | KR |
20110055891 | May 2011 | KR |
20120086457 | Aug 2012 | KR |
10-2013-0134014 | Dec 2013 | KR |
555162 | Apr 1977 | SU |
2005051579 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2007086830 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2011091449 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2012162074 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013137857 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2014152838 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014189924 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO 2018125314 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Oda et al. Microstructure and sinterability of nano-crystal tungsten powders. J Japan Inst Metals and Mater. 2005;69(11):967-72. doi:10/2320/jinstmet.69.697. (Year: 2005). |
SU 555162 Espacenet Machine Translation (Year: 2019). |
SU 555162 Derwent Summary (Year: 2019). |
CN 101343708A Proquest Machine Translation (Year: 2020). |
CN 102071346A Proquest Machine Translation (Year: 2020). |
Dobrzanski et al.Structure and properties of the cutting tools made form cemented carbides and cermets with the TiN+mono-, gradient-, or multi (Ti,Al,Si)N + TiN nanocrysatlline coatings. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 164-165 (2005) 805-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.072 (Year: 2005). |
Trindade et al. Amorphous Phase Forming Ability in (W-C)-Based Sputtered Films. 1998 Acta Metallurgica vol. 46, No. 5 pp. 1731-1739. PII: S1359-6454(97)00336-4 (Year: 1997). |
Derwent Summary CN 102071346A (Year: 2020). |
“Nano-Phase W and W-Ti Composite via Gas-Phase Combustion Synthesis” Axelbaum, R. L., et al. Materials and Manufacturing Processes vol. 11, No. 6, 1043-1053, 1996. (Year: 1996). |
Examination Report for Application No. EP 14768344.5 dated Apr. 15, 2019. |
Japanese Office Action, with English translation thereof, dated Mar. 30, 2018 for Application No. JP 2016-502666. |
Amram et al., Interplay between thermodynamic and kinetic stabilization mechanisms in nanocrystalline Fe—Mg alloys. Acta Mater. 2018;144:447-58. Epub Nov. 7, 2017. |
Chookajorn et al., Duplex nanocrystalline alloys: Entropic nanostructure stabilization and a case study on W-Cr. J Mater Res. Jan. 28, 2015;30(2):151-63. |
Clark et al., Thermal stability comparison of nanocrystalline Fe-based binary alloy pairs. JOM. Jun. 2016;68(6):1625-33. Epub Mar. 24, 2016. |
Cordero et al., Sub-scale ballistic testing of an ultrafine grained tungsten alloy into concrete targets. Int J Impact Eng. 2016;91:1-5. Epub Dec. 18, 2015. |
Darling et al., Mitigating grain growth in binary nanocrystalline alloys through solute selection based on thermodynamic stability maps. Comput Mater Sci. Mar. 2014; 84:255-66. Epub Dec. 31, 2013. |
Darling et al., Extreme creep resistance in a microstructurally stable nanocrystalline alloy. Nature. Sep. 15, 2016;537:378-81. Suppl Info 10 pages. doi:10/1038/nature19313. |
Huang et al., Exploring the concurrence of phase transition and grain growth in nanostructured alloy. Acta Mater. Oct. 1, 2016;118:306-16. Epub Aug. 5, 2016. |
Huskins et al., Micropillar compression testing of powders. J Mater Sci. 2015;50(21):7058-63. Epub Jul. 21, 2015. |
Kalidindi et al., Nanocrystalline materials at equilibrium: A thermodynamic review. JOM. Dec. 2015;67(12):2834-43. Epub Sep. 23, 2015. |
Khalajhedayati et al., High-temperature stability and grain boundary complexion formation in a nanocrystalline Cu—Zr alloy. JOM. Dec. 2015;67(12):2788-801. Epub Sep. 23, 2015. |
Moelle et al., Thermal stability of nanocrystalline iron prepared by mechanical attrition. NanoStructured Mater. 1995;6:421-24. |
Natter et al., Nanocrystalline nickel and nickel-copper alloys: Synthesis, characterization, and thermal stability. J Mater Res. May 1998;13(5):1186-97. |
Nieman et al., Tensile strength and creep properties of nanocrystalline palladium. Scripta Metall et Mater. Jan. 1990;24(1):145-50. |
Oda et al., Microstructure and sinterability of nano-crystal tungsten powders. J Japan Inst Met. , The Japan Institute of Metals and Materials. Nov. 2005;679(11):967-72. doi: 10/2320/jinstmet.69.697. |
Ogawa, Mechanical properties of hot compacting high nitrogen nanocrystalline austenite stainless steel powders mechanically alloyed. Study 52, Collection of papers of lectures by the Iron and Steel Inst of Japan, Materials and Processes, Current Advances in Materials and Processes, Japan, The Iron and Steel. |
Paiste, Deforming and compacting chromium-tungsten powders to create stronger metals. MIT News, Phys Org. Dec. 3, 2014. Retrieved Aug. 10, 2015 from http://phys.org/news/2014-12- deforming-compacting-chromium-tungsten-powders-stronger.html. 4 pages. |
Paiste, Alloying tougher tungsten. MIT MPC Webpage. Updated Dec. 1, 2014. https://mpc- www.mit/edu/component/k2/item/469-alloying-tougher-tungsten, accessed on the internet Aug. 10, 2015. 5 pages. |
Paiste, Tougher tungsten to replace uranium in armor-piercing projectiles. PDD Webpage. Dec. 4, 2014. https://www.pddnet.com/news/2014/12/tougher-tungsten-replace-uranium-armor-piercing- projectiles, accessed on the internet Aug. 10, 2015. 11 pages. |
Park, Design of Bulk Nanocrystalline Tungsten Alloys via Nano-Phase Separation Sintering. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering. Submitted Feb. 2015. Believed to have been published Aug. 2015. 112 pages. |
Robertson et al., Review of densification of titanium based powder systems in press and sinter processing. Powder Metall. 2010;53(2):146-62. |
Schuh et al., Powder processing of amorphous tungsten-bearing alloys and composites. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, DTRA-TR-14-73, Technical Report. Mar. 2015. HDTRA1-11-1-0062. 25 pages. |
Schuster et al., Nanocrystalline refractory metals for extreme condition applications. JOM. Dec. 2011;63(12):27-31. |
Xu et al., Microstructures and stabilization mechanisms of nanocrystalline iron-chromium alloys with hafnium addition. Metall Mater Trans A. Sep. 2015;46A:4394-404. Epub Jun. 2, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action dated May 4, 2018 for Application No. 201480014408.2. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2019 for Application No. CN 201480014408.2. |
Japanese Office Action, and English translation thereof, dated Mar. 8, 2019 for counterpart Application No. JP 2016-502666. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP 14768344.5 dated Nov. 9, 2016. |
Da Costa, Sinter densification of nanocrystalline composite W—Cu powder. International Journal of Powder Metallurgy. Jul. 31, 2005; 41(4): 51-57. |
Telu et al. Densification and characterisation of W—Cr—Nb alloys prepared by sintering of mechanically alloyed nanocrystalline powders. Powder Metallurgy Feb. 28, 2013; 56(1): 83-88. |
Yan et al., Fabrication of nano-crystalline W—Ni—Fe pre-alloyed powders by mechanical alloying technique. Trans. Nonferrous Met Soc China Dec. 1, 2009; 19:s711-s717. |
Chinese Office Action, and English translation thereof, dated Aug. 10, 2017 for Application No. 201480014408.2. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/027932 dated Jul. 29, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2014/027932 dated Sep. 24, 2015. |
Beth, Concrete Penetration. Division 2, National Defense Research Committee of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base—Dayton, Ohio. 1946. 65 pages. |
Cho et al., Nanocrystalline and Ultra-Fine Grained Tungsten for Kinetic Energy Penetrator and Warhead Liner Applications. Army Research Laboratory. ARL-RP-180. Jun. 2007. 14 pages. |
Cordero et al., Powder-Route Synthesis and Mechanical Testing of Ultrafine Grain Tungsten Alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Jul. 2014. 45A: 3609-3618. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-014-2286-1. |
Ehlers et al. Small-Caliber Projectile Target Impact Angle Determined from Close Proximity Radiographs. Army Research Laboratory. DTIC Document. Oct. 2006. 51 pages. |
Forrestal et al., A spherical cavity-expansion penetration model for concrete targets. International Journal of Solids and Structures. Nov. 1997. 34(31-32): 4127-46. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00017-6. |
Forrestal et al., An empirical equation for penetration depth of ogive-nose projectiles into concrete targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering. Aug. 1994. 15(4): 395-405. doi: 10. 1016/0734-743X(94)80024-4. |
Forrestal et al., Dynamic Spherical Cavity-Expansion in a Compressible Elastic-Plastic Solid. J. Appl Mech. Jun. 1, 1988. 55(2): 275-9. doi:10.1115/1.3173672. |
Forrestal et al., Penetration into soil targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 1992. 1293: 427-44. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(92)90167-R. |
Forrestal et al., Penetration of 6061-T651 Aluminum Targets With Rigid Long Rods. J Appl Mech. Dec. 1, 1988. 55(4): 755-60. doi:10.1115/1.3173718. |
Forrestal et al., Penetration of concrete targets with deceleration-time measurements. International Journal of Impact Engineering. May 2003. 28(5): 479-97. |
Forrestal et al., Penetration of grout and concrete targets with ogive-nose steel projectiles. International Journal of Impact Engineering. Jul. 1996. 18(5): 465-76. doi: 10.1016/0734- 743X(95)00048-F. |
Forrestal et al., Penetration of reinforced concrete with ogive-nose penetrators. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 1988. 24(1):77-87. |
Forrestal, Penetration into dry porous rock. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 1986. 22(12): 1485-1500. doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(86)90057-0. |
Frew et al., Penetration of concrete targets with ogive-nose steel rods. International Journal of Impact Engineering. Jun. 1, 1998. 21(6): 489-97. doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00008-6. |
Frew et al., The effect of concrete target diameter on projectile deceleration and penetration depth. International Journal of Impact Engineering. Oct. 2006. 32(10): 1584-1594. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.012. |
German et al, Enhanced Low-Temperature Sintering of Tungsten. Metallurgical Transactions A. Dec. 1976. 7(12):1873-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02659818. |
German et al. The Effect of Nickel and Palladium Additions on Activated Sintering of Tungsten. Int J Powder Metall. 1976. 12: 115. |
German et al., Systematic Trends in Chemically Activated Sintering of Tungsten. High Temp Sci. 1976. 8:267. |
Kecskes et al., Grain size engineering of bcc refractory metals: Top-down and bottom-up-Application to tungsten. Mater Sci Eng A. Oct. 15, 2007. 467(1-2): 33-43. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.099. |
Knowles, Dielectric Constant of Ethyl Alcohol Vapor and Possible Effect of Conductivity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1931. 36(10): 2554-66. doi:10.1021/j 150340a003. |
Leferink et al., Chromium Diffusion Coatings on Low-Alloyed Steels for Corrosion Protection Under Sulphidizing Conditions. VGB Kraftwerkstechnik. 1993. 73(3): 1-14. |
Luk et al., Penetration into semi-infinite reinforced-concrete targets with spherical and ogival nose projectiles. Inti J Impact Eng. 1987. 6(4): 291-301. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(87)90096-0. |
Park et al., Accelerated sintering in phase-separating nanostructured alloys. Nature Communications, 6:6858 (2015) DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7858. |
Park et al., Diffusion of tungsten in chromium: Experiments and atomistic modeling. J Alloy Compd. Available online May 27, 2014. 611: 433-9. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.085. |
Silling et al., Mass loss from abrasion on ogive-nose steel projectiles that penetrate concrete targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering. Nov. 2007. 34(11): 1814-20. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.10.008. |
Vacek et al., Uber die Beeinflussung des Sinterverhaltens von Wolfram. Methods of Influencing the Sintering Behavior of Tungsten. Planseeber. Pulvermet. 1959. bd 7, 6. |
Warren et al., Evaluation of Large Amplitude Deceleration Data from Projectile Penetration into Concrete Targets. Experimental Mechanics. Feb. 2014. 54(2):241-53. E Pub Jul. 17, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s 11340-013-9767-9. |
Wei et al., Dynamic behaviors of body-centered cubic metals with ultrafine grained and nanocrystalline microstructures. Mater Sci Eng A. Oct. 15, 2008. 493(1-2): 58-64. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.126. |
Wei et al., Effect of low-temperature rolling on the tensile behavior of commercially pure tungsten. Mater Sci Eng A. Sep. 15, 2008. 491 (1-2): 62-9. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.013. |
Wei et al., Microstructure and mechanical properties at different length scales and strain rates of nanocrystalline tantalum produced by high-pressure torsion. Acta Materialia. Apr. 2011. 59(6): 2423-36. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.042. |
Wei et al., Microstructure and mechanical properties of super-strong nanocrystalline tungsten processed by high-pressure torsion. Acta Materialia. Sep. 2006. 54 (15): 4079-89. |
Wei et al., Nanoengineering opens a new era for tungsten as well. The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS). Sep. 2006. 58(9):40-4. DOI10.1007/s 11837-006-0081-1. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2019 for Application No. 201480014408.2. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 14768344.5 dated Nov. 9, 2016. |
Japanese Office Action, and English translation thereof, dated Mar. 30, 2018 for Application No. JP 2016-502666. |
Japanese Office Action, and English translation thereof, dated Mar. 8, 2019 for Application No. JP 2016-502666. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2014/027932 dated Sep. 25, 2015. |
[No Author Listed], Sinter and Hot Pressing Definitions from ISO 3252. 2103—hot pressing; 3105 pressure sintering; 30001 sintering. Powder Metallurgy Vocabulary (Year: 1999). 1999. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:3252:ed-4:v1:en:term:3015. 3 pages. |
Amato, On the mechanism of activated sintering of tungsten powders. Materials Science and Engineering. 1972. 10: 15-22. |
Ames et al., Unraveling the nature of room temperature grain growth in nanocrystalline materials. Acta Materialia. Sep. 2008. 56(16): 4255-4266. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.051. |
Bose et al.,Microstructural Refinement of W—Ni—Fe Heavy Alloys by Alloying Additions. Metallurgical Transactions A. Dec. 1988. 19A (12): 3100-3103. DOI: 10.1007/BF02647738. |
Bui et al., On the strengthening behavior of ultrafine-grained nickel processed from nanopowders. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010. 527: 3227-3235. |
Cayless et al., Alloy and temper designation systems for aluminum and aluminum alloys. ASM Handbook, vol. 2: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous alloys and Special-Purpose materials. ASM Handbook Committee, 1990;15-28. |
Chen et al., Sintering dense nanocrystalline ceramics without final-stage grain growth. Nature. Mar. 9, 2000. 404(6774):168-71. |
Chookajorn et al., Design of stable nanocrystalline alloys. Science. Aug. 23, 2012;337(6097):951-4. doi:10.1126/science.1224737. |
Ehlers et al. Small-Caliber Projectile Target Impact Angle Determined from Close Proximity Radiographs. Army Research Laboratory. DTIC Document. ARL-TR-3943. Oct. 2006. 51 pages. |
Forrestal et al., Dynamic Spherical Cavity-Expansion in a Compressible Elastic-Plastic Solid. J. Appl Meeh. Jun. 1, 1988. 55(2): 275-9. doi: 10.1115/1.3173672. |
Forrestal et al., Penetration into soil targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 1992. 12(3): 427-44. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(92)90167-R. |
Gente et al., Formation of Thermodynamically Unstable Solid-Solutions in the Cu—Co System by Mechanical Alloying. Physical Review B. 1993. 48(18): 13244-52. |
German et al., Enhanced Low-Temperature Sintering of Tungsten. Metallurgical Transactions A. Dec. 1976. 7A(12):1873-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02659818. |
German et al. The Effect of Nickel and Palladium Additions on Activated Sintering of Tungsten. Int J Powder Metall. Apr. 1976. 12(2): 115-25. |
German et al., Systematic Trends in Chemically Activated Sintering of Tungsten. High Temp Sci. 1976. 8:267-80. |
German, Liquid phase sintering. Plenum Press, New York. 1985-TOC. 4 pages. |
German, Microstructure of the Gravitationally Settled Region in a Liquid-Phase Sintered Dilute Tungsten Heavy Alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Feb. 1995.26A:279-88. |
Gleiter, Nanocrystalline Materials. Progress in Materials Science. 1989. 33: 223-315. |
Gupta et al., Thin intergranular films and solid-state activated sintering in nickel-doped tungsten. Acta Materialia. 2007;55:3131-42. |
Hague et al., Modeling densification during sinter-forging of yttria-partially-stabilized zirconia. Materials Science and Engineering. 1995;A204:83-9. |
Han et al., The effects of ball-milling treatment on the densificatoin behavior of ultra-fine tungsten powder. Int J Refract Metals and Hard Mater. 2011;29:743-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2011.06.010. |
Hausner. Metal Powder Industries Federation. Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy proceedings. Proceedings of the 1965 International Powder Metallurgy Conference. vol. 1. Fundamentals and Methods. 1966. Plenum Press, New York. 6 pages. |
Huskins et al., Micropillar compression testing of powders. J Mater Sci. 2015;50(21):7058-63. |
Johnson et al., Solid-State contributions to densification during liquid phase sintering. Metallurgical and Materials Translations B. Dec. 1996. 27B: 901-9. |
Kang et al., Densification and Shrinkage during Liquid-Phase Sintering. Journal American Ceramic Society. 1991. 74(2): 425-7. |
Kircheim et al., Grain Coarsening inhibited by solute segregation. Acta Materialia. 2002. 50:413-9. |
Kleinlogel et al., Sintering of nanocrystalline CeO2 Ceramics. Advanced Materials. 2001. 13(14): 1081-5. |
Knowles, Dielectric Constant of Ethyl Alcohol Vapor and Possible Effect of Conductivity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1931. 36(10): 2554-66. doi: 10.1021/jl50340a003. |
Kornilov, Solubility of the elements in chromium. Bull Acad Sci of the USSR, Div Chem Sci. Nov. 1953;2(6):871-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01167529. |
Kothari et al., Densification and Grain Growth during Liquid-Phase Sintering of Tungsten-Nickel-Copper Alloys. Journal of Less-Common Metals. 1967. 13: 457-68. |
Kuczynski et al., Segregation in Homogeneous Alloys during Sintering. Acta Metallurgica. 1960. 8: 209-15. |
Kumar et al., Densification of Nanostructured Titania Assisted by a Phase-Transformation. Nature. Jul. 2, 1992. 358: 48-51. |
Lee et al., Microstructural Evolution and Mechanical Properties under High Strain Rate Testing of W-3.99Ni-1.71Fe Sintered by a Two-Stage Sintering Process. Materials Transactions. 2012. 53 (7): 1318-23. |
Lee et al., Theoretical analysis of liquid-phase sintering: Pore filling theory. Acta Mater. 1998. 46 (9): 3191-3202. |
Li et al., The properties of Tungsten Processed by Chemically Activated Sintering. Metallurgical Transactions A. Oct. 1983. 14A: 2031-41. |
Lian et al., On the Enhanced Grain-Growth in Ultrafine Grained Metals. Acta Metall Mater. 1995. 43 (11): 4165-70. |
Liao et al., Theory of high pressure/low temperature sintering of bulk nanocrystalline. TiO2. Acta Mater. 1997. 45(10): 4027-40. |
Luk et al., Penetration into semi-infinite reinforced-concrete targets with spherical and ogival nose projectiles. Intl Impact Eng. 1987. 6(4): 291-301. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(87)90096-0. |
Luo et al. The Role of a Bilayer Interfacial Phase on Liquid Metal Embrittlement. Science. Sep. 2011;333:1730-3. |
Luo et al., Grain boundary disordering in binary alloys. Applied Physics Letters. 2008. 92: 101901-1 to 101901-3. |
Luo et al., Segregation-induced grain boundary premelting in nickel-doped tungsten. Applied Physics Letters. 2005. 87: 231902-1 to 231902-3. |
Mishra et al., High-pressure sintering of nanocrystalline y-AI2O3. J. Am. Ceram Soc. 1996. 79(11): 2989-2992. |
Moelle et al., Thermal stability of nanocrystalline iron prepared by mechanical attrition. NanoStructured Mater. 1995;6:421-424. |
Monma et al., Diffusion of Ni63 and Cr51 in nickelchromium alloys. Eng. Abs. Nihon Kinzoku Gakkai. 1964. 25: 188-192. |
Mundy et al., Self-Diffusion in Chromium. Physical Review B. Jul. 15, 1981. 24 (2): 658-65. |
Mundy et al., Self-Diffusion in Tungsten. Physical Review B. Dec. 15, 1978. 18 (12): 6566-75. |
Murdoch et al., Stability of binary nanocrystalline alloys against grain growth and phase separation. Acta Materialia. 2013. 61: 2121-32. |
Oda et al., Microstructure and sinterability of nano-crystal tungsten powders. J Japan Inst Metals and Mater. 2005;69(11):967-72. doi:10/2320/jinstmet.69.697. |
Ogawa, Mechanical properties of hot compacting high nitrogen nanocrystalline austenite stainless steel powders mechanically alloyed, Discussion 52, Collection of papers of lectures by the Iron and Steel Inst of Japan, Materials and Processes, Japan, Mar. 1, 1999;12(1):CAMP-ISIJ, ISSN:0914-6628. |
Orru et al., Consolidation/synthesis of materials by electric current activated/assisted sintering. Materials Science and Engineering R. 2009. 63: 127-287. |
Panichkina, Activated sintering of tungsten with small additions of nickel. Theory and Technology of Sintering, Thermal, and Chemicothermal Treatment Processes. Institute of Materials Science, Academy of Sciences of the UkrSSR. 1967;87-90. Translated from Poroshkovaya Metallurgiya, Feb. 1967;No. 2(50):1-5. |
Park et al., Accelerated sintering in phase-separating nanostructured alloys. Nature Communications. Apr. 22, 2015;6(6858), 6 pages. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7858. |
Park et al., Grain Growth behavior of tungsten heavy alloys based on the master sintering curve concept. Metallurgical Transactions A. Nov. 2006. 37A: 3337-46. |
Park et al., Microstructural Change during Liquid-Phase Sintering of W—Ni—Fe Alloy. Metallurgical Transactions A. May 1989. 20A: 837-45. |
Srinivasarao et al., Bimodally grained high-strength Fe fabricated by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering. Acta Materialia. 2009. 57: 3277-86. |
Su et al., Master sintering curve: A practical approach to sintering. Journal of American Ceramic Society. 1996. 79(12): 3211-17. |
Telu et al. Densification and characterisation of W—Cr—Nb alloys prepared by sintering of mechanically alloyed nanocrystalline powders. Powder Metallurgy. Feb. 28, 2013; 56(1): 83-88. ref not available to public until Mar. 28, 2013. |
Turchi et al., Modeling of Ni—Cr—Mo based alloys: Part 1-phase stability. Computer coupling of phase diagrams and thermochemistry. 2006. 30: 70-87. |
Uenishi et al., Formation of a Super-Saturated Solid-Solution in the Ag—Cu System by Mechanical Alloying. Materials Science and Engineering A. 1991. 134: 1342-5. |
Weissmuller. Alloy Effects in Nanostructures. Nanostructured Materials. 1993. 3: 261-72. |
Yavari et al., Mechanically Driven Alloying of Immiscible Elements. Physical Review Letters. 1992. 68(14): 2235-8. 6 pages. |
Yih, Tungsten: sources, metallurgy, properties, and applications (Plenum Press, New York, 1979). |
Yoon et al., Grain-Growth and Densification during Liquid-Phase Sintering of W—Ni. Acta Metallurgica. 1979. 27: 693-8. |
Zhan et al., Single-Wall carbon nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites. Nature Materials. 2003. 2: 38-42. |
Zhang et al. Fabrication of bulk noncrystalline Fe—C alloy by spark plasma sintering of mechanically milled powder. Scripta Materialia. 2005. 53: 863-8. |
Zhang et al. Microstructure characteristic, mechanical properties and sintering mechanism of nanocrystalline copper obtained by SPS process. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2009. 523: 134-8. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/214,282, filed Jun. 12, 2018, Schuh et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,026, filed Aug. 12, 2019, Schuh et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/268,096, filed Sep. 16, 2016, Schuh et al. |
CN 201480014408.2, Aug. 10, 2017, Chinese Office Action. |
CN 201480014408.2, May 4, 2018, Chinese Office Action. |
CN 201480014408.2, Jan. 30, 2019, Chinese Office Action. |
EP 14768344.5, Nov. 9, 2016, European Extended Search Report. |
EP 14768344.5, Apr. 15, 2019, European Examination Report. |
JP 2016-502666, Mar. 30, 2018, Japanese Office Action. |
JP 2016-502666, Mar. 8, 2019, Japanese Office Action. |
PCT/US2014/027932, Jul. 29, 2014, International Search Report and Written Communication. |
PCT/US2014/027932, Sep. 24, 2015, International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
KR 10-2015-7028190, Apr. 22, 2020, Korean Office Action. |
Indian Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2020 for Application No. 8033/DELNP/2015. |
Korean Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2020 for Application No. 10-2015-7028190. |
U.S. Office Action dated May 14, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,026. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2019 for Application No. 201480014408.2. |
Japanese Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 20, 2019 for Application No. 2016-502666. |
Crosby et al., Enhancement in Ti—6Al—4V sintering via nanostructured powder and spark plasma sintering. Powder Metallurgy. Jan. 15, 2014;57(2):147-54. doi: 10.1179/1743290113Y.0000000082. |
Xiao et al., Preparation of W—Cr nano alloying powders with different Cr contents by mechanical alloying. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals. Nov. 2007;17(11):1779-84. doi:10.19476/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2007.11.009. |
Xu et al., Effect of mechanical alloying on the mechanical property of Y2O3/Cr—Ni composite. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences). Oct. 2008;44(5):119-24. |
IN 8033/DELNP/2015, Mar. 16, 2020, Indian Office Action. |
Chinese Office Action dated May 8, 2021 for Application No. CN 201480014408.2. |
Liu et al., Powder metallurgical low-modulus Ti—Mg alloys for biomedical applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C. Nov. 2015;56:241-50. |
European Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2021 for Application No. EP 14768344.5. |
Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 12, 2021 for Application No. JP 2020-005692. |
Raman et al., Oxidation resistance of nanocrystalline vis-à-vis microcrystalline Fe—Cr alloys. Corr Sci Ox. Feb. 1, 2009;51(2):316-21. |
Vajpai et al., Preparation of nanocrystalline Ni—Fe strip via mechanical alloying-compaction-sintering-hot rolling route. J Mat Sci. Jan. 1, 2009; 44(1):129-35. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 20, 2020 for Application No. 201480014408.2. |
EP 14768344.5, Feb. 25, 2021, European Office Action. |
JP 2020-005692, Feb. 12, 2021, Japanese Office Action. |
Koch at al., Stabilization of nanocrystalline grain sizes by solute additions. Journal of Material Science. Jul. 2008;43(23): 7264-7272. |
Sun et al., Synthesis and characterization of mechanical-alloyed Ti-xMg alloys. J Alloys Compounds. Jun. 2002;340(1):220-5. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8388(01)02027-8. |
Suryanarayana et al., Nanocrystalline titanium-magnesium alloys through mechanical alloying. J Mater Res. Sep. 1990;5(9):1880-6. |
Korean Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2022, for Application No. 10-2022-7007391. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 17, 2021 for Application No. 10-2015-7028190. |
U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,026. |
Ladelpha et al., Metallurgical assessment of an emerging Al—Zn—Mg—Cu P/M alloy. Mater Sci Engin. Sep. 15, 2009;520(1-2):105-13. |
Machio et al., Characterization of mechanically alloyed f.c.c. Ti—Mg-based powders. Powder Technology. 2011;207:387-95. Epub Dec. 3, 2010. |
Murray, Mg—Ti (Magnesium-Titanium). Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, II. Edition. 1990;3:2559-60. |
Murray, The Mg—Ti (Magnesium-Titanium) System. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams. 1986;7(3):245-8. |
Nakai et al., Exploration of alloying effects of insoluble elements using a non-equilibrium process. Institute of Materials Research. Tohoku University, Japan. Dec. 31, 2015:30-6. |
Ohnuma et al., Phase Equilibria in the Ti-—Al Binary System. Acta Mater. Jul. 17, 2000;48:3113-23. |
Qureshi et al., Development of Low Density Ternary Ti—MG—B Alloy Via Mechanical Alloying. Mat. Tech & Adv. Perf. Mat. 2002;17(3):160-4. Epub Aug. 25, 2016. |
Yoshizawa et al., Soft magnetic properties in bulk nanocrystalline alloys fabricated by a shock-wave sintering. Mat Sci Engin A. Mar. 25, 2007;449-51:480-4. |
Zhang et al., First-principles study of solid-solution hardening in steel alloys. Comp Mater Sci. Apr. 30, 2012;55:269-72. Epub Jan. 12, 2012. |
Zhang et al., Spark plasma sintering of soft magnetic Fe—Si—B—P—Cu nanocrystalline alloy in the form of magnetic cores. Mat Trans. Oct. 19, 2011;52(12):2254-7. |
Zhang et al., New progress in developing other ferrous alloys. Innovative Progress Abroad in the Field of Materials. Jun. 2015; 22-3. |
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2022, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,026. |
Callister, Classification of materials. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. Fifth Ed. 2000. |
Georgeault et al., Comportement au frittage de systemes pulverulents (Ni + Cr) et elaboration des alliages correspondants. Ann. Chim. Fr. 1983;8:203-13. |
Hinds, Determination of gold, palladium and platinum in high purity silver by different solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry methods. Spectrochim Acta B: Atomic Spectroscopy. Feb. 3, 1993; 48(3): 435-45. |
Loos-Neskovic et al., The use of neutron activation for routine analysis of pure iron and chromium. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1976; 85: 95-102. |
Xie et al. Development of high performance MgFe alloy as potential biodegradable materials. Materials Science and Engineering A. Aug. 2016; 671: 48-53. |
US Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 19, 2023, for U.S. Appl. No. 16/538,026. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200010937 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61784743 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14214282 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 16537996 | US |