The present invention generally relates to corrugated box making machines and more particularly to a novel and improved method and apparatus to provide for small size adjustment of the corrugated boards produced during the rotary die cut process on a corrugated box-making machine.
Rotary die cutters include a die drum or cylinder having on its surface a cutting die typically made of steel rule for cutting or creasing corrugated board against an anvil drum or cylinder. This process occurs as the board passes between the two drums. The anvil cylinder is circumferentially covered with 10 inch to 20 inch wide and initially 0.420 inch to 0.300 inch thick urethane blankets. As knives on the die drum cut the corrugated boards, the anvil urethane blankets wear down and change thickness.
It is well known that the surface speed of the anvil affects the accuracy of the die cut of the corrugated board. Ideally the surface speed of the anvil drum should be equal to the linear speed of the board as it travels through the die cutter. As the urethane blankets wear, the overall diameter of the anvil drum decreases which reduces the surface speed of the anvil and ultimately changes the cut size of the produced corrugated box.
Several systems exist to compensate for the change in diameter of the anvil by changing the rotational speed of the anvil drum in accordance with the change of the drum diameter. On some systems the die cutter operator manually measures the diameter of the anvil drum and then inputs the measurement into the control system, which then changes the rotational speed of the anvil drum. To provide for the fine anvil speed adjustment, an operator usually tries to “fool the system” and inputs a number in the control system that is higher or lower then the number corresponding to the real anvil diameter. This method is not accurate and requires several “trial and error” attempts. Also, a significant change of this number results in a large difference between the surface speeds of the die drum and the anvil drum, which leads to additional stresses on the die cutter components and the breaking of the die-cutter knives. Also, there are no provisions for the control system to “remember” this number, so when the same die is used the next time, the operator must repeat the “trial and error” procedure.
An improved system (the MicroGrind™ system) is disclosed in the above-identified patent application Ser. No. 09/471,011 where the position of the anvil grinding or trimming mechanism determines the diameter of the anvil drum automatically. The computer feeds this information into the control system, which then changes the rotational speed of the anvil drum. However, even if the surface speed of the anvil drum is perfectly correlated with the drum diameter, there is still a need to fine adjust the surface speed of the anvil drum within a small range, usually +/−3%, to achieve a perfectly sized corrugated box. There are several reasons for this need. One of them may be an imperfection of the cutting and creasing die that is mounted on the surface of the die drum. Another may be the change in the amount of impression of the die cutter knives and blades into the anvil.
The object of the present invention is to provide novel and improved methods and apparatus for fine size adjustment of the corrugated boards produced during rotary die cut process in a corrugated box-making machine.
Rotary die cutter of the corrugated box making machine 1 includes a cutting die cylinder 2 with fixed running diameter and an anvil cylinder 3, which receive in their nip corrugated boards 4 to be cut or creased by a cutting die, which uses steel rules 5 to cut corrugated boards against the anvil 3. The anvil cylinder includes steel drum and anvil blankets 6 typically made of urethane, which are wrapped and fixed around the surface of the drum.
As the sheets of corrugated paper run through the die cutter, the blades of the cutting and creasing die 5 penetrate through the anvil blankets 6 to obtain the desired cutting and scoring effect. This causes the anvil blankets 6 to wear down and changes the overall diameter of the anvil. To achieve high dimensional stability of the produced corrugated boxes, it is important that both the die cylinder 2 and the anvil cylinder 3 are driven with the same surface speed.
As the anvil blankets 6 wear, it is desirable to increase the rotational speed of the anvil cylinder 3. The goal is match the linear speed of the outer surface of the anvil cylinder to the running linear speed of the die cylinder 2, which equals the linear speed of the corrugated sheet passing through the die cutter.
The anvil blanket 6 is resurfaced by a MicroGrind™ system schematically shown in FIG. 2. The computer process flow diagram for the preferred embodiment is shown on FIG. 3.
The encoder 10 is attached to the rotating end of the die drum 2. The encoder 10 sends two different signals to the computer 9. Signal S1 brings information to the computer 9 on the number of die drum 2 revolutions, and is then used by the computer 9 to periodically initiate the grinding cycle. Signal S2 brings information on the rotational speed of the die drum. This value is measured in revolutions per minute and will be expressed in formulas as “RPM_D”.
The grinding roll 7, which extends along the anvil cylinder 3, automatically grinds 0.001″ from the surface of the anvil for every 10,000 corrugated sheets passing through the die cutter. This keeps the surface of the anvil even, level and smooth. The position of the grinding roll 7 is controlled by the servomotor 4, which takes its positioning signal S3 from the computer 9.
Since the computer 9 controls the movements of the grinding roll 7, at the end of each grinding cycle the computer 9 automatically determines the value of the anvil blanket thickness 6. This value is displayed on the screen of the computer-operator interface (FIG. 4 and
The computer 9 automatically calculates rotational speed of the anvil cylinder 3, expressed in formulas as “RPM_A”, by using the formula:
Where:
According to the present invention, the machine operator has the ability to change the value of the computer calculated rotational speed of anvil cylinder 3 (“RPM_A”) within a small amount, +/−5% but preferably within +/−3%. This process is called “Cut Length Override”.
To perform the “Cut Length Override”, the operator pushes either buttons B1, B2 or B3 on the control touch panel of the computer-operator interface, shown on FIG. 4. This operation will input signal S5 (
The value of “K” is displayed on the screen of computer-operator interface (
The value of “Cut Length Override” factor “K” is unique for each specific set of cutting and creasing dies and will be the same each time the specific set of dies is used. The value of “K” may be saved in the computer memory. If the machine has an automatic computer set-up feature, this value can be recalled from the computer memory and reused each time this particular set of dies is used.
When including “Cut Length Override” factor “K”, Formula 1 becomes:
Where:
The machine operator will input at the control panel (
Based on the value of “RPM_AA”, the computer sends compensating signal S4 to a servomotor 11 that controls compensating mechanism 12, which adjusts the rotational speed of the anvil cylinder 3 to the value of “RPM_AA”. The result is that the corrugated boards are cut to the desired length.
Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been shown and described above, other forms of the invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art but without departing from the scope of the invention indicated in the appended claims.
This application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/471,011 filed Dec. 23, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,609,997, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RESURFACING ANVIL BLANKET OF A ROTARY DIE CUTTER BOX-MAKING MACHINE. The entire disclosure of the aforementioned application is hereby incorporated herein by reference and made part hereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4736660 | Benach et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4846774 | Bell | Jul 1989 | A |
5131966 | Coffey | Jul 1992 | A |
5582569 | Kowalewski et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5879278 | Cox | Mar 1999 | A |
6074333 | Rajala et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6106448 | Obara et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6267034 | Beckwith | Jul 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040110448 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09471011 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 10346720 | US |