Patent Grant
7030321
1. Field of Invention
The present invention is directed to twisted pair cables, particularly those having twist lays, insulation thicknesses, insulation materials, and performance variables, such as characteristic impedance, that are optimized to achieve low skew.
2. Discussion of Related Art
High performance electrical cables are often used to transmit electrical signals between devices or components of a network. These cables typically include several pairs of insulated conductors twisted together, generally in a double-helix pattern about a longitudinal axis. Such an arrangement of insulated conductors, referred to herein as “twisted pairs,” facilitates forming a balanced transmission line for data communications. One or more twisted pairs may subsequently be bundled and/or bound together to form a data communication cable.
Modern communication cables must meet electrical performance characteristics required for transmission at high frequencies. The Telecommunications Industry Association and the Electronics Industry Association (TIA/EIA) have developed standards which specify specific categories of performance for cable impedance, attenuation, skew and crosstalk isolation. For example, one standard for crosstalk or, in particular, crosstalk isolation, is TIA/EIA-568-A, wherein a category 5 cable is required to have 38 dB of isolation between the twisted pairs at 100 MHz and a category 6 cable is required to have 42 dB of isolation between the twisted pairs at 100 MHz. Various cable design techniques have been used to date in order to try to reduce crosstalk and to attempt to meet the industry standards. In addition, if cables are to be used in plenum, they must pass the Underwriter's Laboratory Standard 910 test, commonly referred to as the Steiner Tunnel test.
These specifications and requirements limit the selection of insulation materials that may be used in communication cables. Preferred insulation materials have been fluoropolymers because these materials provide certain desirable electronic characteristics, such as low signal attenuation and reduced signal phase delay. In addition, communication cables having insulation materials formed from fluoropolymers can pass the Steiner Tunnel test. Examples of fluoropolymer insulation materials used in communication cables include fluoroethylenepropylene (FEP), ethylenechlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
However, fluoropolymer insulation materials also have disadvantages such as is relatively high cost and limited availability caused by the high demand for these materials. Therefore, several communication cables have been developed that replace some of the fluoropolymer insulation materials with certain non-fluoropolymer insulation materials. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,072 to Gagnon, herein incorporated by reference, discloses a twisted pair cable wherein each conductor of the twisted pair has a dual-layer insulation, the first (inner) layer being a foamed polyolefin including a flame retardant and the second (outer) layer being a fluoropolymer. In another example, a cable construction may comprise a mix of conductors, for example, with some conductors of the cable insulated with a single layer of fluoropolymer materials and others conductors in the same cable insulated with a single layer of polyolefin materials.
It is known that as the dielectric constant of an insulation material covering the conductors of a twisted pair decreases, the velocity of propagation of a signal traveling through the twisted pair of conductors increases and the phase delay added to the signal as it travels through the twisted pair decreases. In other words, the velocity of propagation of the signal through the twisted pair of conductors is inversely proportional to the dielectric constant of the insulation material and the added phase delay is proportional to the dielectric constant of the insulation material. Thus, using different insulation materials among conductor pairs within a cable may cause a variation in the phase delay added to the signals propagating through different ones of the conductors pairs. It is to be appreciated that for this specification the term “skew” is a difference in a phase delay added to the electrical signal for each of the plurality of twisted pairs of the communication cable. A skew may result from the insulation material covering one twisted pair of conductors being different than the insulation material covering another twisted pair of conductors of a communication cable.
In addition, in order to impedance match a cable to a load (e.g., a network component), a cable may be rated with a particular “characteristic impedance.” For example, many radio frequency (RF) components may have characteristic impedances of 50 or 100 Ohms and therefore, many high frequency cables may similarly be manufactured with a characteristic impedance of 50 or 100 Ohms so as to facilitate connecting of different RF loads. The characteristic impedance of the cable may generally be determined based on a composite of the individual nominal impedances of each of the twisted pairs making up the cable. The nominal impedance of a twisted pair may be related to several parameters including the diameter of the wires of the twisted pairs making up the cable, the center-to-center distance between the conductors of the twisted pairs, which may in turn depend on the thickness of the insulating layers surrounding the wires, and the dielectric constant of the material used to form the insulating layers.
In conventional manufacturing, it is generally considered more beneficial to design and manufacture twisted pairs to achieve as close to the specified characteristic impedance of the cable as possible, generally within plus or minus 2 Ohms. The primary reason for this is to take into account impedance variations that may occur during manufacture of the twisted pairs and the cable. The further away from the specified characteristic impedance a particular twisted pair is, the more likely a momentary deviation from the specified characteristic impedance the input impedance of at any particular frequency due to impedance roughness will exceed limits for both input impedance and return loss of the cable.
Many of the same parameters of a twisted pair affect both the characteristic impedance and the skew of a twisted pair cable. Therefore, there needs to be a balance or trade-off created between these parameters for the cable to meet all specified performance requirements, such as return loss, skew and crosstalk.
According to one embodiment, a cable comprises a first twisted pair of conductors surrounded by a first insulation material having a first dielectric constant, the first twisted pair of conductors having a first signal phase delay, and a second twisted pair of conductors insulated by a second insulation material having a second dielectric constant greater than the first dielectric constant, the second twisted pair of conductors having a second signal phase delay substantially equal to the first signal phase delay such that a skew of the cable is less than approximately 7 nanoseconds per 100 meters. The first twisted pair of conductors has a first twist lay and the second twisted pair of conductors has a second twist lay greater than the first twist lay, and the second insulation material comprises a first layer having a third dielectric constant and a second layer having a fourth dielectric constant such that the second dielectric constant is an effective dielectric constant of a combination the first and second layers.
According to another embodiment, a cable comprises a first twisted pair of conductors insulated by a first insulation material having a first dielectric constant, the first twisted pair of conductors having a first signal phase delay, and a second twisted pair of conductors insulated by a second insulation material having a second dielectric constant greater than the first dielectric constant, the second twisted pair of conductors having a second signal phase delay substantially equal to the first signal phase delay such that a skew of the cable is less than approximately 7 nanoseconds per 100 meters. The first twisted pair of conductors has a first twist lay and the second twisted pair of conductors has a second twist lay greater than the first twist lay, and the first insulation is a composite formed of at least two different materials.
Another embodiment of a cable having a specified characteristic impedance comprises a plurality of twisted pairs of insulated conductors designated into a first group of twisted pairs and a second group of twisted pairs, wherein each twisted pair designated into the first group of twisted pairs has a first twist lay, a first insulation thickness and a first nominal impedance, wherein each twisted pair designated into the second group of twisted pairs has a second twist lay, a second insulation thickness and a second nominal impedance, and wherein a first combination of the first twist lay and the first insulation thickness, and a second combination of the second twist lay and the second insulation thickness are selected such that a difference between the first nominal impedance and the second nominal impedance is greater than about 2 Ohms and less than about 15 Ohms, and the cable has a skew of less than approximately 25 ns per 100 m.
In one example of the cable, each of the plurality of twisted pairs has a same insulation material. In another example, the first and second combinations are selected such that an impedance delta between the first nominal impedance and the second nominal impedance is in a range of about 8 Ohms to 15 Ohms.
According to another embodiment, there is provided a method of manufacturing a cable comprising a plurality of twisted pairs of insulated conductors that are designated into two groups wherein each twisted pair designated into the first group of twisted pairs has a first twist lay, a first insulation material and a first insulation thickness and wherein each twisted pair designated into the second group of twisted pairs has a second twist lay, a second insulation material and a second insulation thickness, the method comprising steps of selecting a combination of the first twist lay, the first insulation material and the first insulation thickness such that the twisted pairs designated into the first group have a first nominal impedance, and selecting a combination of the second twist lay, the second insulation material and the second insulation thickness such that the twisted pairs designated into the second group have a second nominal impedance that is at least 2 Ohms greater than the first nominal impedance and such that a skew between the twisted pairs of the first group and the twisted pairs of the second group is less than about 25 ns per 100 m.
In one example, the act of selecting the combination of the second twist lay, the second insulation material and the second insulation thickness includes selecting the combination such that a delta between the second nominal impedance and the first nominal impedance is in a range of about 8 Ohms to 15 Ohms.
The accompanying drawings, are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the drawings, each identical or nearly identical component that is illustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. For purposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in every drawing. In the drawings:
Various embodiments of the invention are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying figures. However, it is to be appreciated that the invention is not limited to any number of twisted pairs or any profile for the cables illustrated in any of these embodiments. The inventive principles can be applied to cables including greater or fewer numbers of twisted pairs and having different core profiles. In addition, the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,” “containing”, “involving”, and variations thereof herein, is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.
According to one embodiment, a cable 100 may comprise a plurality of twisted pairs of insulated conductors including a first twisted pair 102 and a second twisted pair 104, surrounded by an outer jacket 106, as illustrated in
Referring to
As discussed above, both the insulation material used for the insulated conductors and the twist lay used for each twisted pair may affect the propagation velocity of electrical signals through the twisted pairs. In order to reduce crosstalk between pairs, it may be desirable to vary the twist lays of the twisted pairs 102, 104. However, this may result in the twisted pairs 102, 104 having different electrical lengths, causing a skew to exist within the cable 100. The present invention is directed to several configurations of cables using varying twist lays and insulation materials optimized to achieve closely matched signal velocities relative to the final twist lays of the cable to minimize skew within the cable.
As discussed above, the propagation velocity of a signal through a twisted pair of insulated conductors is affected by the dielectric constant of the insulating material used for that twisted pair. For example, using a so-called “faster” insulation, such as fluoroethylenepropylene (FEP), the propagation velocity of a signal through the twisted pair 102 may be approximately 0.69 c (where c is the speed of light in a vacuum). For a “slower” insulation, such as polyethylene, the propagation velocity of a signal through the twisted pair 102 may be approximately 0.66 c.
According to one embodiment, the second twisted pair 104 may have a longer twist lay length than does the first twisted pair 102, as shown in
Thus, the second twisted pair 104 may have the second insulation layers 112 comprising a second insulation material that has a higher dielectric constant than the first insulation material. For example, the first insulation layer 110 may comprise FEP and the second insulation layer 112 may comprise polyethylene. Compensating for the higher signal phase delay provided by the twisted pair 104 (due to the higher dielectric constant of the insulation layer 112) relative to the twisted pair 102, the untwisted length of the twisted pair 102 can be increased compared to the untwisted length of the twisted pair 104. Thus, by controlling the twist lay lengths of twisted pairs 102 and 104 relative to one another and by selecting insulation materials having different dielectric constants for the insulation layers 110, 112, the signal phase delay added to the signal by the twisted pair 102 can be manipulated to be similar to the signal phase delay added to the signal propagating through the twisted pair 104.
The effective dielectric constant of an insulation material may also depend, at least in part, on the thickness of the insulating layer. This is because the effective dielectric constant may be a composite of the dielectric constant of the insulating material itself in combination with the surrounding air. Therefore, the propagation velocity of a signal through a twisted pair may depend not only on the twist lay and insulation material used, but also on the thickness of the insulation of that twisted pair.
Referring to
The characteristic impedance of the cable may generally be determined based on a composite of the individual nominal impedances of each of the twisted pairs making up the cable. The nominal characteristic impedance of each twisted pair may be determined by measuring the input impedance of the twisted pair over a range of frequencies, for example, the range of desired operating frequencies for the cable. A curve fit of each of the measured input impedances, for example, for 801 measured points, across the operating frequency range of the cable may then be used to determine a “fitted” nominal characteristic impedance of each twisted pair making up the cable, and thus of the cable as a whole. The TIA/EIA specification for characteristic impedance of a cable is given in terms of this fitted characteristic impedance including an allowable range of deviation. For example, the specification for a category 5 or 6,100 Ohm cable is 100 Ohms, +/−15 Ohms for frequencies between 100 and 350 MHz and 100 Ohms +/−12 Ohms for frequencies below 100 MHz.
In conventional cables, it is common to design the twisted pair to have a nominal input impedance as close as possible to the specified overall nominal input impedance of the cable. By contrast, Applicant has identified that a reduction in the skew of a cable can be obtained by optimizing the insulation thicknesses to specific pair lays and, in this optimization procedure, allowing an increased deviation of the nominal impedances of the twisted pairs relative to the specified characteristic impedance value for the cable. An advantage of selecting this trade-off is that reduced skew can be obtained while still achieving an acceptable impedance variation and return loss for the cable.
As stated above, the specification for the characteristic impedance of a category 5 or category 6, 100 Ohm cable allows a maximum deviation from the specified 100 Ohm impedance value of +/−15 Ohms for operating frequencies between 100 and 350 MHz and +/−12 Ohms for operating frequencies below 100 MHz. However, conventionally, cable manufacturers have attempted to ensure that each twisted pair has a nominal impedance within +/−2 Ohms of the specified characteristic impedance of the cable. Modern manufacturing includes computerized real-time process controls, latest-technology equipment and improved raw materials, allowing for greater precision in the manufacturing process. This enhanced precision manufacturing allows for use of more of the 15 Ohm (or 12 Ohm) tolerance range because greater precision reduces the “roughness” of the impedance over the operating frequency range. Allowing greater variation in the nominal impedance of the twisted pairs may allow optimization, or variation, of parameters affecting characteristic impedance, to improve other performance characteristics of the cable, such as, for example, the skew of the cable. One example of a machine that may be used, in combination with a standard extrusion machine, to achieve improved manufacturing precision is a Beta LaserMike Model 1000 parameter measuring machine. This machine may be used to measure cable parameters during manufacture of the cable and information provided by the machine can be sued to extrude twisted pairs with tighter tolerances.
Referring to Table 1 below, there is given exemplary twist lay lengths for each twisted pair in one example of a four-pair cable. A conventional cable (including four twisted pairs having the twist lay lengths given in Table 1) designed to have characteristic impedance of about 100 Ohms and using like insulation materials and thicknesses on each conductor of the four twisted pairs, may typically have a skew of about 25 nanoseconds (ns) per 100 meters (m) for faster insulations (for example, FEP @ 0.69 c), and about 30 ns/100 m for slower insulation (e.g., polyethylene @ 0.66 c). Conventionally, the insulation thicknesses would be selected (as shown in Table 1) to achieve an impedance variation of about +/−1 to 2 Ohms among the twisted pairs.
Applicant has recognized that by optimizing the insulation thicknesses relative to the twist lays of each twisted pair in the cable, the skew of a cable can be substantially reduced. Although varying the insulation thicknesses may cause variation in the characteristic impedance values of the twisted pairs, under improved manufacturing processes, impedance roughness over frequency (i.e., variation of the impedance of any one twisted pair over the operating frequency range) can be controlled to be reduced, thus allowing for a design optimized for skew while still meeting the specification for characteristic impedance and return loss.
According to one embodiment, a four-pair cable was designed, using a slower insulation material (e.g., polyethylene) and standard pair lays, where all insulation thicknesses were set to 0.041 inches. The twist lays are given below in Table 2. This cable exhibited a skew reduction of about 8 ns/100 meters (relative to the conventional cable described above—this cable was measured to have a worst case skew of approximately 21 ns, whereas the conventional, impedance-optimized cable exhibits a skew of approximately 30 ns or higher), yet the individual pair impedances were within 0 to 3 Ohms of deviation from the specified characteristic impedance (as shown in Table 2), leaving plenty of room for further impedance deviation, and therefore skew reduction.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a cable may comprise a plurality of twisted pairs of insulated conductors, wherein twisted pairs with longer pair lays have a relatively higher characteristic impedance and larger insulation thickness, while twisted pairs with shorter pair lays have a relatively lower characteristic impedance and smaller insulation thickness. In this manner, pair lays and insulation thickness may be controlled so as to further reduce the overall skew of the cable. One example of such a cable, using polyethylene insulation is given in Table 3 below. This cable was measured to have a skew of approximately 17 ns.
This concept may be better understood with reference to FIGS. 3A–D and 4A–D which respectively illustrate graphs of measured input impedance versus frequency and return loss versus frequency for the twisted pairs of the four-pair cable described in Table 2. Referring to
Referring to
One aspect of this disclosure is allowing some deviation in the twisted pair characteristic impedances relative to the nominal impedance value to allow for a greater range of insulation thicknesses. Smaller diameters are provided for a given pair lay to result in a lower pair angle and shorter non-twisted pair length. Conversely, larger pair diameters result in a higher pair angles and longer non-twisted pair length. Where a tighter (shorter) pair lay would normally have an insulation thickness of 0.043 inches for 100 Ohms, a diameter of 0.041 inches yields a reduced impedance of about 98 Ohms. Longer pair lays using the same insulation material would normally have a lower insulation thickness of about 0.039 inches for 100 ohms, and a diameter of 0.041 inches can be provided and yield about 103 Ohms. As shown in FIGS. 3A–D and 4A–D, allowing this “target” impedance variation from 100 Ohms does not prevent the twisted pairs, and the cable, from meeting the input impedance specification, but may allow improved skew in the cable.
As discussed above, the many constraints imposed on cable designs by the industry standards and specifications may limit the variety of materials that may be used as insulation for the conductors of the twisted pairs. This may, in turn, limit the accuracy with which the signal phase delay added by each twisted pair may be controlled, or may impose strict tolerances on the twist lays of each twisted pair. Applicants have recognized that by using dual-layer insulation for at least some of the twisted pairs may allow the added signal phase delay to be controlled with better precision, at least in part because the effective dielectric constant of the dual-layer insulation depends upon the dielectric constant of the materials used for each layer and on the ratio of the relative thickness of each layer.
According to one embodiment, illustrated in
According to one embodiment, the dual-layer insulation of at least one twisted pair, for example, twisted pair 250a, may comprise a first insulation layer 254 and a second insulation layer 256. In one example, the first insulation layer 254 may be a polyolefin-based material, such as, for example, polyethylene's, polypropylenes, flame retardant polyethylene, and the like. The second insulation layer 256 may be, for example, FEP or another fluoropolymer. As discussed above, using a fluoropolymer for the outer (second) insulation layer may have advantages in terms of passing the Steiner Tunnel test so that the cable may be plenum rated. However, the invention is not limited to plenum rated cables, and the second insulation layer 256 may also be a non-fluoropolymer. The thicknesses of the first and second insulation layers may be chosen according to factors such as relative cost of the materials and the smoke and flame properties of the materials. The ratio between the thickness of the first insulation layer 254 and the second insulation layer 256 may be selected based on the dielectric constants of the material used for each layer and the desired overall effective dielectric constant for the dual-layer insulation.
Referring again to
It is to be appreciated that the above dimensions and specified materials are provided as an example for the purposes of explanation and that the invention is not limited to the specifics examples given herein. In particular, considering the four-pair cable illustrated in
Referring to
The skew between each twisted pair combination for the above-described cable was measured and is given in Table 5 below. As discussed above, the worst-case skew (i.e., the largest skew between any two twisted pairs) for this exemplary cable was measured to be approximately 4.48 ns/100 meters, illustrating that such a cable can achieve a significant improvement in skew over a conventional cable.
Referring to
According to another embodiment, the insulation layer for at least one of the plurality of twisted pairs in the cable may comprise an extruded composite insulation layer 78c. A plurality of materials may be combined and mixed during the extrusion process to form the single layer composite insulation 78c. At least one of the materials used to form the composite insulation 78c may have a dielectric constant that is different from the dielectric constant the insulation material on one or more conductors of at least one other twisted pair in the cable.
In one example, the materials that may be mixed to provide the composite insulation may be polyolefins. The ratio of volumes of the various materials used to form the composite insulation may be selected so as to provide a composite insulation having a desired effective dielectric constant and desired effective propagation velocity characteristics. For example, a first material may have a velocity characteristic v1=0.66 c (where c is the speed of light in a vacuum) and a second material may have a velocity characteristic v2=0.68 c. If the first and second materials are mixed in equal quantities, they may yield a composite material having a velocity characteristic vm=0.67 c. Therefore, by controlling the materials used and the ratio of volumes in which they are mixed, a composite material may be formed having a predetermined desired velocity characteristic and effective dielectric constant.
One or more twisted pairs of insulated conductors in a multi-pair cable may use a composite insulation material, as described above, such that a ratio of the effective dielectric constants of the materials relative to another twisted pair within the cable may be varied to achieve closely matched signal velocities relative to the final twist lays of the twisted pairs.
According to one embodiment, a four-pair cable, such as illustrated in
Table 4 below provides a theoretical example of one embodiment of a four pair cable using composite insulations. The composite insulation is formed from a mixture, in the proportions given in the table below, of a first insulation material having a velocity characteristic of 0.66 c and a second insulation material having a velocity characteristic of 0.61 c. A cable according to this example theoretically has a skew of less than approximately 5 ns/100 m.
In one example, a multiple pair cable may comprise a plurality of twisted pairs of insulated conductors, at least one twisted pair having an insulation material that is different from the insulation material of another twisted pair, wherein the insulation thicknesses may be optimized for a skew less than approximately 7 ns/100 meters. In another example, the insulation thicknesses may be optimized for a skew less than approximately 25 ns/100 meters. In yet another example, the insulation thicknesses may be optimized for a characteristic impedance deviation among the twisted pairs of less than about 15 Ohms. By selecting slower of faster dielectrics for the insulation and optimizing the thickness of the selected insulation, the impedance variation between twisted pairs can be reduced for any given desired skew value. For example, a faster insulation material, such as FEP, may allow a twisted pair with a shorter twist lay length to have slightly thicker insulation layer, e.g., about 2 mils thicker, relative to another twisted pair with a longer twist lay length, the two twisted pairs still maintaining desired skew results. In summary, all parameters, including insulation material, twist lay length and insulation thickness, may be individually adjusted to obtain desired skew and return loss performance.
Having thus described several aspects of at least one embodiment of this invention, it is to be appreciated various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description and drawings are by way of example only.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/490,651, entitled “LOW-SKEW, HIGH SPEED DATA CABLE,” filed on Jul. 28, 2003, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/553,758, entitled “SKEW ADJUSTED DATA CABLE,” filed on Mar. 17, 2004, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 483285 | Guilleaume | Sep 1892 | A |
| 867659 | Hoopes et al. | Oct 1907 | A |
| 1008370 | Robillot | Nov 1911 | A |
| 1132452 | Davis | Mar 1915 | A |
| 1700606 | Beaver | Jan 1929 | A |
| 1883269 | Yonkers | Oct 1932 | A |
| 1940917 | Okazaki | Dec 1933 | A |
| 1976847 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1934 | A |
| 1977209 | Sargent | Oct 1934 | A |
| 1995201 | Delon | Mar 1935 | A |
| 2218830 | Rose et al. | Oct 1940 | A |
| 2501457 | Thelin | Mar 1950 | A |
| 2538019 | Lee | Jan 1951 | A |
| 2882676 | Bryan et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
| 3055967 | Bondon | Sep 1962 | A |
| 3328510 | White | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3340112 | Davis et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3559390 | Staschewski | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3603715 | Edhardt et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3622683 | Roberts et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3644659 | Campbell | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3649744 | Coleman | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3819443 | Simons et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3881052 | Britz et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3911200 | Simons et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 4034148 | Lang | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4319940 | Arroyo et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4487992 | Tomita | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4500748 | Klein | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4595793 | Arroyo et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4605818 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4644098 | Norris | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4647714 | Goto | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4654476 | Barnicol-Ottler et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4697051 | Beggs et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4710594 | Walling et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4767891 | Biegon et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4777325 | Siwinski | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4778246 | Carroll | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4784462 | Priaroggia | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4788088 | Kohl | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4800236 | Lemke | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4828352 | Kraft | May 1989 | A |
| 4847443 | Basconi | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4866212 | Ingram | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4892683 | Naseem | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4912283 | O'Connor | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4970352 | Satoh | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4987394 | Harman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5010210 | Sidi et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5015800 | Vaupotic et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5037999 | Van Deusen | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5043530 | Davies | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5068497 | Krieger | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5073682 | Walling et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5077449 | Cornibert et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5097099 | Miller | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5107076 | Bullock et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5132488 | Tessier et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5132490 | Aldissi | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5132491 | Mulrooney | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5142100 | Vaupotic | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5146048 | Yutori et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5149915 | Brunker et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5155304 | Gossett et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5170010 | Aldissi | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5173961 | Chiasson | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5177809 | Zeidler | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5180890 | Pendergrass | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5206485 | Srubas et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5212350 | Gebs | May 1993 | A |
| 5216202 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220130 | Walters | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5222177 | Chu et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5245134 | Vana, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5253317 | Allen et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5254188 | Blew | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5298680 | Kenny | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5304739 | Klug et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5313020 | Sackett | May 1994 | A |
| 5371484 | Nixon | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5393933 | Goertz | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399813 | McNeill et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5418878 | Sass et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5424491 | Walling et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5493071 | Newmoyer | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5514837 | Kenny et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5541361 | Friesen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544270 | Clark et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5574250 | Hardie et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576515 | Bleich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5658406 | Walling et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5666452 | Deitz, Sr. et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5699467 | Kojima et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5744757 | Kenny et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5767441 | Brorein et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5789711 | Gaeris et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814768 | Wessels et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5821466 | Clark et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5821467 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5834697 | Baker et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5841073 | Randa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5883334 | Newmoyer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888100 | Bofill et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5900588 | Springer et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5920672 | White | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5936205 | Newmoyer | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5952607 | Friesen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952615 | Prudhon | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956445 | Deitz, Sr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5990419 | Bogese, II | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6037546 | Mottine et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6074503 | Clark et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6091025 | Cotter et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6150612 | Grandy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6153826 | Kenny et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162992 | Clark et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6194663 | Friesen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6248954 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6255593 | Reede | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6272828 | Walling et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6273977 | Harden et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6288340 | Arnould | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6300573 | Horie et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6303867 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6323427 | Rutledge | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6355876 | Morimoto | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6441308 | Gagnon | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6462268 | Hazy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6566607 | Walling | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6570095 | Clark et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6596944 | Clark et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050056454 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60553758 | Mar 2004 | US | |
| 60490651 | Jul 2003 | US |
