The present invention generally relates to alpine ski bindings, all-terrain (AT) ski bindings, tech-bindings and, in particular, to multi-directional release alpine, AT and tech ski binding heel units that release in the vertical and lateral directions.
Toe-heel type bindings that provide lateral heel release and which mitigate inadvertent pre-release have been proposed. However, during aggressive edging on hard-pack snow or ice, or especially in the presence of Phantom Foot or Slip-Catch events (for more information about these injury mechanisms, please refer to: Effect of Ski Binding Parameters on Knee Biomechanics; A Three-Dimensional Computational Study, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 2004; July; 36(7):1218-25; as well as, Kinematics of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures in World Cup Alpine Skiing: 2 Case Reports of the Slip-Catch Mechanism, Am J Sports Med, 2013 May; 41(5):1067-73; and Critical Load Cases for Knee Ligaments at Skiing—An Engineering Approach, Skiing Trauma and Safety: Thirteenth Volume ASTM STP 1397, 2000:160-74; incorporated herein by reference), those bindings with their correspondingly tall heel pads increase the effective lever arm over which the abduction force component of a Phantom Foot or Slip-Catch event acts, thereby increasing valgus torque within the knee. Excessive valgus torque within the knee causes excessive strain across the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), excessive strain across the medial collateral ligament (MCL), excessive compressive loads on the lateral surfaces of the proximal tibial plateau, excessive compressive loads on the lateral surfaces of the menisci, and excessive compressive loads on the lateral condyles of the distal end of the femur. As such, the presence of excessive strain and compressive loading has required proposed bindings to release laterally at the heel in order to limit the strain and compressive loads. Those prior art lateral heel release bindings with their tall heel pads also have the capacity to generate large tensile loading of the ACL during Boot Induced Anterior Drawer (BIAD) events, which pure or nearly-pure BIAD-events, lateral heel release bindings cannot address. The inherently tall heel pads of those lateral heel release bindings are a consequence of the stacking-height of the lateral heel release mechanism and the longitudinal pressure spring(s).
Tall heel pads extend the distance from the snow surface to the knee, thereby increasing the effective lever arm from the point at which abduction forces enter the medial edge of the ski (under, or near, the projected axis of the tibia) at the ski-snow boundary—to the center of the knee. Increasing the distance over which an abduction force generates valgus torque to the knee—together with the addition of tibia torque—increases strain across the ACL (Valgus Plus Internal Rotation Moments Increase Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strain More Than Either Alone. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 2011 August; 43(8):1484-91. incorporated herein by reference). Increased strain across the ACL then increases the possibility that the ACL will reach its elastic limit, causing a skier to sustain a Grade-I ACL sprain (semi-mild sprain), Grade-II ACL sprain (significant sprain); or causing a skier to sustain a Grade-III ACL rupture. ACL injuries are the most frequent injury in alpine skiing (see the peer reviewed journal paper on ski-injury epidemiology, Snowboarding Injuries: Trends Over Time and Comparisons with Alpine Skiing Injuries, Am J Sports Med, Jan. 12, 2012; published online as a preview, incorporated herein by reference) and are severe in terms of the level of debility imparted because they require at least 8-months of aggressive rehabilitation after reconstructive surgery. Recently, it was estimated that approximately 50,000 skiing-ACL injuries occurred during the 2011-12 alpine ski season at an estimated US$20,000 cost per injury, or a total accumulated cost of US$1-billion per year. The estimated US$20,000 cost per injury includes diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation, but does not include the costs associated with the typical onset of early PTOA (post-traumatic osteoarthritis) or the social cost of worker-compensation during the course of rehabilitation. Alpine skiing ACL injuries are therefore both frequent and severe. As such, an alpine ski binding, an AT ski binding and/or a tech ski binding that is able to mitigate such injuries would be highly desirable.
There is thus a need for a ski binding that provides the benefits of lateral heel release and retention while minimizing the forces, torques and bending moments that are transferred to the musculoskeletal structures of the leg (e.g. the knee, the ACL, the MCL, the tibial plateau, the menisci and the condyles of the femur) by the lever arm from the snow surface to the knee. Similarly, the minimization of forces, torques and bending moments acting upon these musculoskeletal structures will result in a reduced number of instances whereupon the lateral heel release of a binding should be actuated.
The shortcomings of prior art ski bindings with respect to lateral heel release are at least mitigated by an alpine, AT, or tech ski binding that provides additional protection against knee injuries, including injuries to the ACL, MCL, tibial plateau, menisci, and femoral condyles by reducing the length of the lever arm from the snow-surface to the knee. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, additional mitigation of knee injuries is obtained by providing a laterally-releasing heel unit of a ski binding wherein the heel unit has a lowered heel pad.
The lowered heel pad lateral heel release binding will generally reduce peak strain across the ACL and MCL and generally reduce compressive loading on the tibial plateau, the menisci and femoral condyles by reducing valgus torque and valgus bending moments to the knee. Such lowered configuration generally also allows a reduction in cumulative stress to these musculoskeletal structures, and also serves to reduce the frequency in which a lateral heel release binding needs to release the ski boot (or in an equal-magnitude and opposite-direction perspective—release the ski) because both the frequency and the severity of loading is reduced. Consequently, reducing the frequency of lateral heel releases also serves to mitigate second-order-injury effects during release-events. Second-order-injuries include events such as having the released ski hitting the skier (or hitting other skiers) during the time between when the ski releases and when the ski comes to a full stop; or reducing the need for a skier with only one remaining ski to ski to a controlled stop without first striking a tree, lift-tower, other skier, or from impacting the snow surface. Each such release-event and possible subsequent impact could cause an upper-body or head injury that could result in a more severe injury than an injury to the ACL, MCL, tibial plateau, menisci or femoral condyles.
In a lateral heel release ski binding, the height of the heel pad is typically guided by the height of the heel cup of the upper heel housing. Accordingly, in order to reduce the height of the heel pad, the upper heel housing also requires lowering. One way in practice to lower the upper heel housing is to lower the lower heel housing to which the upper heel housing is typically indirectly connected.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, lowering the heel pad is generally achieved by reducing the “stacking height” of the mechanical elements inside the lower heel housing. Such reduction in stacking height must take into account significant restrictions such as the width limits of narrow skis, whereon a binding heel unit, including the binding heel unit's related ski-brake elements, should not significantly overhang the width of a narrow ski. Furthermore, the lowered lower heel housing should translate, longitudinally, within its mating heel track, as smoothly and as rapidly as possible during rapid flex and counter-flex of the ski, even in the presence of the eccentric lateral loads that cause the lower heel housing to partially-rotate within its corresponding heel track. Partial-rotation should not cause longitudinal jamming in ways similar to the jamming of dresser-drawers. For example, during the induction of an ACL-straining abduction force generated under or near the projected axis of the tibia, the abduction force can sometimes enter the ski-binding-boot-leg system aftward of the effective lateral-centroid of the lower heel housing and heel track assembly thereby potentially causing a jamming-effect unless a novel heel track system is deployed to avert such jamming effect.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the lowering of the heel pad is generally achieved by reducing the “stacking height” of the mechanical elements inside the lower heel housing. Such reduction in stacking height is typically achieved through a reorganisation of the mechanical elements, such as the springs. The reorganisation of the springs will generally result in having the longitudinal pressure spring positioned eccentrically. For instance, one way to reduce the stacking height referred to herein would be to have the lateral heel release spring(s) and the longitudinal pressure spring(s) in a side by side configuration. However, such side by side configuration could potentially lead to a lower heel housing having springs disposed too asymmetrically to one another. Typically, the reorganisation of the mechanical elements that lower the height of the top surface of the heel pad will result in the lower heel housing being secured, slidingly-longitudinally within the heel track through surfaces of the heel track that are not adjacent to the counter-resistive forces of the longitudinal pressure mechanism, thereby inducing too much friction between the lower heel housing and mating heel track, potentially impeding proper movement of the lower heel housing within the mating heel track during rapid flex and counter-flex of the ski.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the configuration of the interface between the lower heel housing and heel track assembly maximizes the balance of the opposing forces of the eccentrically positioned longitudinal pressure spring against the resultant-refracted force of friction formed at the interfaces between the lower heel housing and heel track—in order to promote smooth longitudinal displacement between the lower heel housing and heel track.
Other and further aspects and advantages of the present invention will be understood by review of the illustrative embodiments about to be described and various advantages not referred to herein will occur to one skilled in the art upon employment of the invention in practice.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following description, reference being made to the accompanying drawings in which:
A novel alpine, AT or ‘tech’ ski binding heel unit will be described hereinafter. Although the invention is described in terms of specific illustrative embodiments, it is to be understood that the embodiments described herein are by way of example only and that the scope of the invention is not intended to be limited thereby.
Now referring to
Now referring to
In other embodiments, the heel track 330 and/or rear heel prong guide 331 and/or heel track 330 could be moulded into the ski structure. In still other embodiments, the heel track 330 and/or rear heel prong guide 331 and/or heel track 330 could also be fixedly-integrated into the ski. In the latter embodiments, although part of the binding would be integrated within the ski structure, the user would preferably have the ability to remove the integrated part(s) if necessary.
Now referring to
Still referring to
The lower heel housing 27 generally slides longitudinally within heel track 330, which sliding is typically controlled by the compressive force of the longitudinal pressure spring 75 against the lower heel housing 27. The lower heel housing is generally limited in maximum aftward longitudinal travel by the coil-to-coil compression of spring 75 and also typically limited in forward longitudinal travel by the shoulder 49 of worm gear 29 acting against lower heel housing 27 on wall 43 (
Now referring to
Prior to the boot being placed between toe piece 101 (
The increased compression then decreased compression of the longitudinal pressure mechanism of heel unit 100 can take place among typical ski-boot-binding systems. Therefore, in order for the toe piece and heel piece of the binding to provide and maintain proper contact of surface 33 with the boot sole during the dynamic rhythm of fore-and-aft longitudinal displacement action of the lower heel housing 27 within the heel track 330, the compressive force supplied by the longitudinal pressure mechanism must not be significantly impeded, dissipated or absorbed by the force of friction arising between the mating surfaces of lower heel housing 27 and heel track 330. Such force of friction generally acts cyclically-opposite in direction to the cyclical force supplied by the longitudinal pressure mechanism. Further, the adverse effects of friction have the potential of becoming amplified by the leverage supplied by any distance over which the force of friction is eccentric to the counter-resistive force supplied by the longitudinal pressure mechanism, unless the leverage-effect is minimized.
The outermost surfaces of upper surface 28 (
Alternatively, heel track 330 could be partially-connected, or fully-connected (not shown) across the top of lower heel housing 27, touching on surfaces 28b or 28a and/or touching on top surface 28.
Referring again to
Still referring to
Such refractive effects comprise generally positioned geometry of the interfacing surfaces of the lower heel housing 27 and heel track 330 to take into account the need to superposition the virtual vector centroid of the overturning moment generated by the ‘force of friction surfaces’ in order to minimize the jamming effect of the overturning moment and to thus maximize the force supplied by the longitudinal pressure mechanism to maintain contact of the toe piece and heel unit with the boot sole during flex and counter-flex of the ski.
Preferably, the novel geometry of the opposing surfaces that refract a virtual vector centroid, 93, of the overturning moment, comprise a series of flat surfaces 80, 81, 82, 83, that can be non-co-planar to each other; alternatively, a curved surface (not shown); or a series of curved surfaces (not shown); a series of flat and curved surfaces (not shown) or any combination thereof, any of which surfaces generating a confluent locus-point that shifts the virtual centroid of the resultant vector closer to the longitudinal pressure spring in order to minimize the effective lever-arm of the overturning moment that arises between the opposing forces of friction and the longitudinal pressure spring.
Now again referring to
Now referring to
In another embodiment, now referring to
In still another embodiment, the two springs, the longitudinal pressure spring 75 and the lateral heel release spring 35, could be configured to be located concentrically, one inside the other. Such configuration would also enable the heel pad 13 top surface 15, and/or its optional element 14, to be lowered while still providing longitudinal pressure compensation, smooth longitudinal movement between a lower heel housing 27 and a heel track 330, and a lateral heel release mechanism 340.
The heel pad 13 can be made of plastic or metal. The top surface 15 of heel pad 13 can be of low coefficient of friction plastic, PTFE, a PTFE-phosphorus-nickel compound (such as NIFLOR) plated into top-surface 15. The optional means 14 can be made of rubber or a rubber-like material (such as low flex-modules Nylon-12). The heel track 330 can be made of stamped metal (stainless steel, cold rolled steel, aluminum or the like), and be optionally plated or be of plastic (such as Nylon-12). The lower heel housing 27 and cam 17 can be made of plastic such as, for example, injection molded, non-hydroscopic, Nylon-12, or the like.
While the illustrative and presently preferred embodiment of the invention is described in detail hereinabove, it is to be understood that the inventive means and function may be otherwise variously embodied and employed and that the claims are intended to be construed to include such variations except insofar as limited by the prior art.
The present patent application claims the benefits of priority of commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/803,922, entitled “SKI BINDING HEEL UNIT” and filed at the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Mar. 21, 2013.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2014/000413 | 3/21/2014 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61803922 | Mar 2013 | US |