Systems are known for tracking the flight of a object such as a golf ball. However, such systems are often unable to distinguish between and measure bouncing, sliding and rolling of the object. Previous systems have purported to measure skid, which includes both bouncing and sliding of objects but only on special surfaces like a velvet carpet—not in real world situations such as, for example, the motion of a golf ball across a putting green. Other systems have required special markings on objects to compare a spin rate of a ball to its linear speed to identify a time at which the ball begins to truly roll. However, these systems work only with specialized balls and are unsuitable for situations in which players use balls not including such specialized markings.
The present invention relates to a system for tracking an object. The system includes a first tracking device aimed so that a first field of view of the first tracking device covers at least a portion of a target volume into which an object is to be launched. The system also includes a processor receiving data from the tracking device and identifying from the data a velocity of the object over time. The processor identifies, based on changes in the velocity of the object, first portions of the path of the object during which the object is bouncing, second portions of the path during which the object is sliding and one or more third portions during which the object is rolling.
The tracking device can be any tracking device capable of measuring as a minimum the velocity of the ball as a function of time. Preferably, the position of the ball is also measured. The tracking device performs the tracking contactless and preferably without any modifications to the ball. The tracking device may be a Doppler radar, lidar or camera tracking device, or any combination thereof.
According to an exemplary embodiment, for each of a plurality of time frames, the processor receives from the first tracking device a signal and calculates from this signal object data including position and velocity values for the object identified.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the processor determines a velocity value for the object at each of a plurality of time frames to determine velocity of the object as a function of time.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the processor separates a path of the object into a plurality of segments based on changes in velocity. For example, each segment may represent a portion of the total path during which a derivative of the velocity (deceleration) is substantially constant. That is, the segments will be separated at points where discontinuities in the deceleration are detected.
According to an exemplary embodiment, each of the plurality of segments is identified as one of a bounce, slide or roll state based on a deceleration during the segment and/or the distance traveled during the segment. The distance R traveled during the segment can preferably be calculated as the area under the velocity versus time curve V(t) during the time interval or the segment
Rt1→t2=∫t1t2V(t)dt.
According to an exemplary embodiment, when the deceleration during a segment is greater than 2 m/s2 (acceleration less than −2 m/s2) and the previous segment was not a roll state, the object is determined to be in a slide state.
According to an exemplary embodiment, if the deceleration during a segment is greater than 0.5 m/s2 but lower than 2 m/s2, the object is in a roll state.
According to an exemplary embodiment, if the deceleration during the segment is less than 0.5 m/s2 and the distance traveled of the object during the segment divided by the total distance traveled of the entire path of the object is greater than 0.3, the object is in a bounce state.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the distance traveled by the object in a bounce, slide or rolling state is determined by calculating the area under the respective bounce, slide or rolling segment velocity versus time curve.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the system detects discontinuities in the velocity and in derivatives thereof (acceleration) to identify the beginning and end of each segment.
According to an exemplary embodiment, discontinuities are detected where a difference between first and second adjacent data points is greater than a set threshold.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the tracking device is a continuous wave Doppler radar. In this case the radial velocity of the object Vrad relative to the radar can be directly measured from the Doppler frequency shift Fd in the radar signal using the Doppler equation Vrad=Fd*λ/2, where λ is the wavelength of the transmitting frequency of the radar.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the system includes a screen displaying the data.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the first radar transmit frequency is between 10 and 125 GHz.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the system further includes a second tracking device aimed so that a second field of view of the second tracking device covers at least a portion of the target volume including a portion of the target volume outside the first field of view.
The exemplary embodiments may be further understood with reference to the following description and the related appended drawings, wherein like elements are provided with the same reference numerals. The exemplary embodiments relate to a device, system and method using a tracking device such as, for example a radar device, to track the trajectory of an object launched from a launching location as the object moves through an area to classify the movement of the object as in a bounce, slide or roll state, and time/distance traveled for each segment. Depending on the physical size of the launch areas as well as practical issues like line-of-sight blockage for a first tracking device, it may be desirable to have one or more additional radar devices in the system to increase the coverage and accuracy of the volume being monitored by the system. Although exemplary embodiments detailed herein describe the tracking of golf balls, those skilled in the art will understand that any sports balls or even non-sports related objects may be tracked with the system in the same manner.
As seen in
The system 100 includes a data processing system 200 which, as would be understood by those skilled in the art, may include one or more computers coupled to the radar device 102 (or multiple radar devices) via either a wired or wireless connection. In an embodiment the data processing system 200 includes a computer 202 associated with the radar device 102. In an exemplary embodiment, the computer 202 defines a three-dimensional radar coordinate system related to data from the radar device 102 permitting the computer 202 to track objects such as the object 112 moving through the field of view 110 and to plot the trajectory of the object 112 relative to the green 106. Those skilled in the art will understand that the universal coordinate system may be made identical to the radar coordinate system to simplify calculation or identical to a radar coordinate system of one of the radar devices of a multi-radar system. However, it may be desirable to define the universal coordinate system based on permanent physical features present in the field of view 110 so that the system 100 may be recalibrated with reference to these permanent physical features as necessary. For example, the coordinate system may be based on a horizontal axis extending from a center of the green 106 to a center of an end line of the green 106. Thus, if the radar device 102 is moved, it may be readily recalibrated to accurately correlate position and trajectory of objects to the features of the green 106.
The flow chart of
In this embodiment, the computer 202 performs the method 400 of
When the velocity of the object 112 drops below the minimum level detectably by the particular tracking device(s) being used, the velocity of the object 112 may be extrapolated by extending the slope of the velocity during the last segment detected by the radar device 102, as shown in
As shown in
If the green is not flat, a component of gravity acceleration may be added to the ball equaling sin(α)*G during sliding and rolling states of the ball, where α is the inclination of the ground relative to the waterline in the direction of the putt and G is the gravity acceleration on earth (9.81 m/s2). For an even better thresholding between sliding and rolling state determination of the ball, the acceleration used for determining sliding or rolling states of the ball for non-bounce segments could be compensated as Aslope_corrected=Ameasured−sin(α)*G, where a is positive if the green 106 slopes downhill and negative if the green 106 slopes uphill in the direction of travel of the object 112. If the tracking system is capable of measuring the height of the object as a function of distance traveled, this can be used to calculate the slope α at any given time, as can be seen in
Those skilled in the art will understand that a putted ball 112 will always start in either a slide or a bounce state—i.e., a ball putted from rest will not immediately be rolling on the green without sliding or bouncing. After a time, the ball 112 may begin to roll without sliding after which it will no longer slide and will only bounce if the ball 112 hits an object on the surface such as, for example, a stick, stone or piece of dirt. In step 510 a segment is analyzed to determine whether the slope of the segment is less than a threshold Aslide. Aslide is typically around −2 m/s2. If the slope is found to be less than Aslide and a previous segment was not a rolling state, the segment is determined to be a sliding state and the method moves to step 540. However, if the previous segment was a rolling state or slope is greater than Aslide, the computer 202 moves to step 520. In step 520, the segment is further analyzed to determine if the slope of the segment is less than a threshold Aroll, where Aroll is typically −0.5 m/s2. If the slope is found to be less than −0.5 m/s2, the segment is determined to be a rolling state and the method moves to step 540. If the slope is found to be greater than −0.5 m/s2, the computer 202 moves to step 530. In step 530, the computer 202 determines if the distance traveled R during this segment, corresponding to the area under the velocity vs. time segment, divided by the total distance traveled by the ball, Rtotal(Rbounce+Rslide+Rroll-tracked+Rroll-extrapolated), is greater than a threshold SRmax, where SRmax is typically 0.3. If yes, the segment is determined to be a rolling state. If not, the segment is determined to be a bounce state and the method moves to step 540. In step 540 the computer 202 determines whether there is another saved segment that has not yet been analyzed. If yes, the computer 202 analyses this next saved segment (e.g., the segment next in time after the previously analyzed segment) and proceeds through steps 510-540 again until every segment has been analyzed and the state associated with each segment has been established. In step 550, once all segments have been analyzed, the data may be provided to an output device 212 (e.g., a device adjacent to the putting green 106 or at any other location where a user may review the data) as shown n
In some instances, the user may wish to know the distance the object 112 traveled before it began a roll state—i.e. the distance the ball 112 bounced and/or slid before beginning to roll. Even though the procedures 400 and 500 in
Those skilled in the art will understand that although the previously described embodiments describe a golf ball being hit on a practice green, the above-described exemplary embodiments may be implemented to track the velocity and movement of any spherical object on any surface. For example, the system 100 may track putts on any green of a golf course, a chip golf shot hit onto a green, a full golf shot hit onto any portion of a golf course (e.g., rough, fairway, bunker, apron, green, etc.). In another exemplary embodiment, the described system 100 may also be used to track any other sports ball to compare the path of the ball to boundaries (e.g., to determine whether a hit baseball is fair or foul, whether a tennis shot is in or out, etc. Other applications include bowling and billiards (e.g., to determine when a bowling or billiards ball starts to roll after an initial period of sliding and/or bouncing) and soccer (e.g., to measure the bounce, slide and roll of a kick).
Those skilled in the art will understand that the above-described exemplary embodiments may be implemented in any suitable software or hardware configuration or combination thereof. An exemplary hardware platform for implementing the exemplary embodiments may include, for example, an Intel x86 based platform with compatible operating system, a Windows platform, a Linux platform, a Mac platform and Mac OS, a mobile device having an operating system such as iOS, Android, etc. In a further example, the exemplary embodiments of the above described method may be embodied as a program containing lines of code stored on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium that may be executed on a processor or microprocessor.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made in the present disclosure, without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the present disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalent.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3025520 | Werner et al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3264643 | Nilssen | Aug 1966 | A |
3324468 | Knepper | Jun 1967 | A |
3540054 | Broderick | Nov 1970 | A |
3777665 | Ziemba | Dec 1973 | A |
3798644 | Constant | Mar 1974 | A |
3798795 | Michelsen | Mar 1974 | A |
3856237 | Torian et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3974740 | Billottet et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3981010 | Michelsen | Sep 1976 | A |
3982713 | Martin | Sep 1976 | A |
3992708 | Olson et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4015258 | Smith et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4050068 | Berg et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4264907 | Durand, Jr. et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4477814 | Brumbaugh et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4509052 | Cash | Apr 1985 | A |
4545576 | Harris | Oct 1985 | A |
4563005 | Hand et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4622554 | Gellekink et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4638320 | Eggert et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4639733 | King et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4713686 | Ozaki et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4717916 | Adams et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4751511 | Komata et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4780719 | Frei et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
5018218 | Peregrim et al. | May 1991 | A |
5056791 | Poillon et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5092602 | Witler et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5134409 | Groot | Jul 1992 | A |
5138322 | Nuttall | Aug 1992 | A |
5150895 | Berger | Sep 1992 | A |
5241317 | Howard | Aug 1993 | A |
5246232 | Eccher et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5290037 | Witler et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5319373 | Maxwell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5341142 | Reis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342051 | Rankin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5357255 | Giraudy | Oct 1994 | A |
5375832 | Witler et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5401026 | Eccher et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404144 | Vlannes | Apr 1995 | A |
5406290 | James et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413345 | Nauck | May 1995 | A |
5486002 | Witler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489099 | Rankin et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5495249 | Chazelle et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504312 | Morrison et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5564698 | Honey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5609534 | Gebhardt et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5631654 | Karr | May 1997 | A |
5652588 | Miron | Jul 1997 | A |
5657027 | Guymon | Aug 1997 | A |
5700204 | Teder | Dec 1997 | A |
5768151 | Lowy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781505 | Rowland | Jul 1998 | A |
5796474 | Squire et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803823 | Gobush et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5846139 | Bair et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862517 | Honey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5868578 | Baum | Feb 1999 | A |
5873040 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879246 | Gebhardt et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912700 | Honey et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917553 | Honey et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5952957 | Szu | Sep 1999 | A |
5953077 | Honey et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6042492 | Baum | Mar 2000 | A |
6057915 | Squire et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067039 | Pyner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6133946 | Cavallaro et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141060 | Honey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6154250 | Honey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6167355 | Fiekowsky | Dec 2000 | A |
6179720 | Rankin et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198501 | Nemiroff et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229550 | Gloudemans et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239747 | Kaminski | May 2001 | B1 |
6244971 | Mihran | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252632 | Cavallaro | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266005 | Schneider | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266100 | Gloudemans et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292130 | Cavallaro et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304665 | Cavallaro et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320173 | Vock et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6371862 | Reda | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400306 | Nohara et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421116 | Schilli et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450442 | Schneider et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456232 | Milnes et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466275 | Honey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6520864 | Wilk | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6547671 | Mihran | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6592465 | Lutz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597406 | Gloudemans et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621561 | Holton | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6657584 | Cavallaro et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6728637 | Ford et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6744403 | Milnes et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764412 | Gobush et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774932 | Ewing et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778148 | Pack et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6791217 | Collier-Hallman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6816185 | Harmath | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6864886 | Cavallaro et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6903676 | Frady | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6909438 | White et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6956523 | Mohan | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965397 | Honey et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6989789 | Ferreol et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7026990 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031873 | Song | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7075556 | Meier et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7116342 | Dengler et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7132975 | Fullerton et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7133801 | Song | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7154540 | Honey et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7161733 | Fukata et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183966 | Schramek et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7213442 | Workman | May 2007 | B2 |
7221794 | Gloudemans, II et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7321330 | Sajima | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333047 | Fullerton et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341530 | Cavallaro et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7492363 | Meier et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7497780 | Kiraly | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7680301 | Pendleton et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7750901 | Meier et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7822229 | Pendleton et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7868914 | Dengler et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7894669 | Gloudemans, II et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7928976 | Meier et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8016653 | Pendleton et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8049750 | Gloudemans et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8054216 | Kinoshita et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073190 | Gloudemans et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077917 | Forsgren | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077981 | Elangovan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8085188 | Tuxen | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8149156 | Allred et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8154633 | Gloudemans et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8189857 | Johnson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8253799 | Elangovan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8335345 | White et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8385658 | Elangovan et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8400346 | Hubbard et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401304 | Cavallaro et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8451265 | Gloudemans et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8456526 | Gloudemans et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8456527 | Elangovan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8457392 | Cavallaro et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8461965 | Chen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8466913 | Gloudemans et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8441476 | Gloudemans et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8558883 | Cavallaro et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8659663 | Elangovan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665153 | Nakagawa et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8705799 | White et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8786415 | Cavallaro et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8845442 | Tuxen | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8866665 | Suzuki | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8884741 | Cavallaro et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8912945 | Tuxen | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8977585 | Cavallaro et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9007463 | Elangovan et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9024810 | Lohbihler | May 2015 | B2 |
9036864 | Johnson et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041722 | Gloudemans et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9215383 | Milnes et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9473748 | Elangovan et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9500743 | Reid et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9555284 | Vollbrecht et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9625321 | Cavallaro et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9645235 | Tuxen | May 2017 | B2 |
9905082 | Dengler et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20020075475 | Holton | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020107078 | Collins | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114493 | McNitt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030027655 | Lutz et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030076255 | Ono | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030103684 | Gobush et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040032363 | Schantz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040032970 | Kiraly | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040156035 | Rogers | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040178945 | Buchanan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040248662 | Gobush et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030222 | Steudel | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030333 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060092075 | Bruce et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060164439 | Dengler et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169932 | Fukata et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070167247 | Lindsay | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070291987 | Saka et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293331 | Tuxen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080018519 | Berg et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021651 | Seeley et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080048907 | Matsuura et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080068463 | Claveau et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080182685 | Marty | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199043 | Forsgren | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080139330 | Tuxen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261711 | Tuxen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090295624 | Tuxen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100029415 | Lindsay | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110250939 | Hobler | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110286632 | Tuxen | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110304497 | Molyneux et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120101711 | Furmston et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130039538 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130158966 | Baek | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130271323 | Joo et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274025 | Luciano, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130346009 | Winter et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140191896 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140347212 | Tuxen | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150105173 | Thurman | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150234045 | Rosenblum et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160047889 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160162160 | Dengler et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160170015 | Tuxen | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160202353 | Saegusa et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160243423 | Tuxen et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160247292 | Tuxen et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160292865 | Floor et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306035 | Johnson | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306036 | Johnson | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306037 | Johnson | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160307335 | Perry et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160313441 | Tuxen | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320476 | Johnson | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327642 | Saegusa et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160339320 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160367861 | Pelz | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170259115 | Hall | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170270354 | Painter | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170333777 | Spivak et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180005492 | Hall | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180011184 | Du Toit et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180175495 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2620991 | Mar 1977 | DE |
102005046085 | Mar 2007 | DE |
0116183 | Dec 1983 | EP |
0116183 | Aug 1984 | EP |
0529489 | Mar 1993 | EP |
1158270 | Nov 2001 | EP |
2283144 | Apr 1995 | GB |
2294403 | May 1996 | GB |
2319834 | Jun 1998 | GB |
2380682 | Apr 2003 | GB |
S59137873 | Aug 1984 | JP |
H06126015 | May 1994 | JP |
H06213989 | Aug 1994 | JP |
H08266701 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2000230974 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001305528 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003098255 | Apr 2003 | JP |
3870233 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007163321 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008249354 | Oct 2008 | JP |
4388639 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2012068139 | Apr 2012 | JP |
1990008936 | Aug 1990 | WO |
1991006348 | May 1991 | WO |
1993004382 | Mar 1993 | WO |
1999027384 | Jun 1999 | WO |
2000062090 | Oct 2000 | WO |
2002025303 | Mar 2002 | WO |
2003005281 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003032006 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2004031680 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005017553 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005081014 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005116678 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006002639 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006002640 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2008038005 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2010086414 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010125790 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011092813 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2016036351 | Mar 2016 | WO |
2016110757 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2018138708 | Aug 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
17th Century mathematics—Newton. Accessed Jan. 22, 2019 at <https://www.storyofmathematics.com/17th_newton.html> (Year: 1687). |
Ruoyo et al., “Radar Reflected Signal Process of High Spinning Rate Projectiles”, The Eighth International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, 2007, pp. 3-982-985. |
Wei et al., “A New Method for Spin Estimation Using the Data of Doppler Radar”, ICSP, 2000, pp. 1911-1914. |
Masuda et al., “Measurement of Initial Conditions of a Flying Golf Ball”, WEAM 4-4, 1994, pp. 344-347. |
Christensen et al., “Doppler-Surface Mapping Technique for Characterisation of Spinning Cylinders Illuminated by Radar”, A&E Systems Magazine, Aug. 2005, pp. 19-24. |
Ong et al., “Signal-Adapted Wavelets for Doppler Radar System”, Seventh Annual Conference on Control, Dec. 2002, pp. 19-23. |
“Technology”, Zelocity, Golf Performance Monitors, Copyright 2004-2006, Retrieved Jun. 9, 2010. |
“3D Doppler Ball Tracking Monitors, Golf Radars and Launch Monitors”, Flightscope, Copyright 2009, Retrieved Jun. 9, 2010. |
Lolck, “TERMA Elektronik AS: Doppler Radar Spin Measurement”, Brochure, 1986. |
“DR 5000 User's Guide: DR 5000 Spin Calculation”, DR 5000 User's Guide, 2004, pp. 27-45 and 48-59. |
Bosse et al., “Improved radar tracking using a multipath model: maximum likelihood compared with eigenvector analysis”, IEEE Proc. Radar, Sonar Navig., Aug. 1994, vol. 141, No. 4, pp. 213-222. |
Blackaby, “Simultaneous RF/EO tracking and characterization of dismounts”, MSc Thesis, 2008, 52 Sheets. |
Fasano et al., “Radar/electro-optical data fusion for non-cooperative UAS sense and avoid”, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 46, pp. 436-450. |
Warthman; Technical Note D-1138: Project Echo—Boresight Cameras for recording antenna point accuracy; NASA, Sep. 1961, 14 sheets. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180120428 A1 | May 2018 | US |