Skid and roll tracking system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10444339
  • Patent Number
    10,444,339
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 31, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 15, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A system for tracking an object includes a first tracking device aimed so that a first field of view of the first tracking device covers at least a portion of a target volume into which an object is to be launched from a launch location and a processor receiving data from the tracking device and identifying from the data the velocity of the object over time, the processor identifying, based on changes in the velocity of the object over time, a first portion of a path of the object during which the object was in one of a bouncing state and a sliding state.
Description
BACKGROUND

Systems are known for tracking the flight of a object such as a golf ball. However, such systems are often unable to distinguish between and measure bouncing, sliding and rolling of the object. Previous systems have purported to measure skid, which includes both bouncing and sliding of objects but only on special surfaces like a velvet carpet—not in real world situations such as, for example, the motion of a golf ball across a putting green. Other systems have required special markings on objects to compare a spin rate of a ball to its linear speed to identify a time at which the ball begins to truly roll. However, these systems work only with specialized balls and are unsuitable for situations in which players use balls not including such specialized markings.


SUMMARY

The present invention relates to a system for tracking an object. The system includes a first tracking device aimed so that a first field of view of the first tracking device covers at least a portion of a target volume into which an object is to be launched. The system also includes a processor receiving data from the tracking device and identifying from the data a velocity of the object over time. The processor identifies, based on changes in the velocity of the object, first portions of the path of the object during which the object is bouncing, second portions of the path during which the object is sliding and one or more third portions during which the object is rolling.


The tracking device can be any tracking device capable of measuring as a minimum the velocity of the ball as a function of time. Preferably, the position of the ball is also measured. The tracking device performs the tracking contactless and preferably without any modifications to the ball. The tracking device may be a Doppler radar, lidar or camera tracking device, or any combination thereof.


According to an exemplary embodiment, for each of a plurality of time frames, the processor receives from the first tracking device a signal and calculates from this signal object data including position and velocity values for the object identified.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the processor determines a velocity value for the object at each of a plurality of time frames to determine velocity of the object as a function of time.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the processor separates a path of the object into a plurality of segments based on changes in velocity. For example, each segment may represent a portion of the total path during which a derivative of the velocity (deceleration) is substantially constant. That is, the segments will be separated at points where discontinuities in the deceleration are detected.


According to an exemplary embodiment, each of the plurality of segments is identified as one of a bounce, slide or roll state based on a deceleration during the segment and/or the distance traveled during the segment. The distance R traveled during the segment can preferably be calculated as the area under the velocity versus time curve V(t) during the time interval or the segment

Rt1→t2=∫t1t2V(t)dt.


According to an exemplary embodiment, when the deceleration during a segment is greater than 2 m/s2 (acceleration less than −2 m/s2) and the previous segment was not a roll state, the object is determined to be in a slide state.


According to an exemplary embodiment, if the deceleration during a segment is greater than 0.5 m/s2 but lower than 2 m/s2, the object is in a roll state.


According to an exemplary embodiment, if the deceleration during the segment is less than 0.5 m/s2 and the distance traveled of the object during the segment divided by the total distance traveled of the entire path of the object is greater than 0.3, the object is in a bounce state.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the distance traveled by the object in a bounce, slide or rolling state is determined by calculating the area under the respective bounce, slide or rolling segment velocity versus time curve.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the system detects discontinuities in the velocity and in derivatives thereof (acceleration) to identify the beginning and end of each segment.


According to an exemplary embodiment, discontinuities are detected where a difference between first and second adjacent data points is greater than a set threshold.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the tracking device is a continuous wave Doppler radar. In this case the radial velocity of the object Vrad relative to the radar can be directly measured from the Doppler frequency shift Fd in the radar signal using the Doppler equation Vrad=Fd*λ/2, where λ is the wavelength of the transmitting frequency of the radar.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the system includes a screen displaying the data.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the first radar transmit frequency is between 10 and 125 GHz.


According to an exemplary embodiment, the system further includes a second tracking device aimed so that a second field of view of the second tracking device covers at least a portion of the target volume including a portion of the target volume outside the first field of view.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a putting green with a radar tracking system according to a first exemplary embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of a method of operation of a radar specific computer according to an exemplary embodiment;



FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of a method for tracking and segmenting the velocity of the object according to an exemplary embodiment;



FIG. 4A shows a graph displaying a first sample Doppler frequency spectrogram from a Doppler radar;



FIG. 4B shows a graph of the velocity of an object detected in the Doppler frequency spectrogram of FIG. 4A as a function of time;



FIG. 4C shows a graph of the acceleration of the object determined from the velocity graph in FIG. 4B;



FIG. 5A shows a graph displaying a second sample Doppler frequency spectrogram from a Doppler radar;



FIG. 5B shows a graph of the velocity of an object detected in the Doppler frequency spectrogram of FIG. 5A as a function of time;



FIG. 5C shows a graph of the acceleration of the object determined from the velocity graph in FIG. 5B;



FIG. 6 shows a flow chart of the method for determining if a segment relates to a slide, roll or bounce state;



FIG. 7 shows an exemplary display screen of the device associated with the user at the putting green; and



FIG. 8 shows a graph of the height of the object as a function of the distance traveled.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The exemplary embodiments may be further understood with reference to the following description and the related appended drawings, wherein like elements are provided with the same reference numerals. The exemplary embodiments relate to a device, system and method using a tracking device such as, for example a radar device, to track the trajectory of an object launched from a launching location as the object moves through an area to classify the movement of the object as in a bounce, slide or roll state, and time/distance traveled for each segment. Depending on the physical size of the launch areas as well as practical issues like line-of-sight blockage for a first tracking device, it may be desirable to have one or more additional radar devices in the system to increase the coverage and accuracy of the volume being monitored by the system. Although exemplary embodiments detailed herein describe the tracking of golf balls, those skilled in the art will understand that any sports balls or even non-sports related objects may be tracked with the system in the same manner.



FIG. 1 shows a first system 100 for tracking an object according to the exemplary embodiments. The first system 100 includes tracking device 102 (i.e. a radar device) distributed around the target area into which the object is to be launched. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the system 100 is a system for tracking a golf ball 112 hit within a target area (e.g., practice green 106) from a put launch location 104 located at a first area 108 of the putting green 106. As would be understood, the put launch location 104 may be located at any area within the putting green 106. As will be described below, the target area, does not need to be any specially created area and can be a golf green or practice green with an irregular, undulating grass surface and one or more holes or other targets. The radar 102 may, for example, be a continuous wave Doppler radar emitting microwaves at an X-band frequency (8-125 GHz) at a power of up to 500 milliWatts EIRP (Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power), thus being compliant with FCC and CE regulations for short range international radiators. However, in other jurisdictions, other power levels may be used in compliance with local regulations. In an exemplary embodiment, microwaves are emitted at a higher frequency between, for example, 10-125 GHz. For more precise measurements at lower object speeds frequencies of 20 GHz or higher may be used. Any type of continuous wave (CW) Doppler radar may be used, including phase or frequency modulated CW radar, multi frequency CW radar or a single frequency CW radar. It will be understood that other tracking devices such as lidar may be used with radiation in either the visible or non-visible frequency region. Current pulsed radar systems are limited in their ability to track objects close to the radar device. However, the distance an object must be from these pulsed radar systems has decreased over time and is expected to continue to decrease. Thus, these types of radar may soon be effective for these operations and their use in the systems of the invention described below is contemplated. Throughout the application, the tracking of objects is described based on the use of Doppler frequency spectrums. As would be understood, these Doppler frequency spectrums refer to the data from continuous wave Doppler radar. If a pulse radar system were employed similar data would be calculated based on a time required for the pulse to return to the radar after reflecting off an object. Any other type of radar capable of three-dimensionally tracking objects similar to those described herein may also be used. In another embodiment, a one-dimensional tracking device may be used such as a one-dimensional Doppler radar. In another embodiment, the system may use multiple tracking devices distributed about a target area into which the object is to be launched. In this embodiment, each of the tracking devices may be situated at any location around the green and, where multiple tracking devices are employed, they may be deployed around the green with overlapping fields of view.


As seen in FIG. 1 the radar device 102 is positioned close to and facing a target area 108 including a practice green 106. The radar device 102 in this embodiment is positioned so that a field of view 110 of the radar device 102 encompasses the entire practice green 106 and some of the surrounding area. This location close to the practice green 106 is selected to permit the radar device 102 to track objects launched from nearly any location within the practice green 106 (unless screened by intervening objects or people on the green) without blockage from trees, buildings or other structures. For a typical practice green 106, this means that the radar device 102 is positioned either a) centered on the practice green 106 or b) elevated above the players. In some embodiments, an optimal position of a radar device may be either directly behind the intended starting location of the put, such as 5-10 feet behind, or directly in front of the intended direction of the put facing backwards toward the starting location of the put, such as 10-40 feet in front, depending on the length of the put.


The system 100 includes a data processing system 200 which, as would be understood by those skilled in the art, may include one or more computers coupled to the radar device 102 (or multiple radar devices) via either a wired or wireless connection. In an embodiment the data processing system 200 includes a computer 202 associated with the radar device 102. In an exemplary embodiment, the computer 202 defines a three-dimensional radar coordinate system related to data from the radar device 102 permitting the computer 202 to track objects such as the object 112 moving through the field of view 110 and to plot the trajectory of the object 112 relative to the green 106. Those skilled in the art will understand that the universal coordinate system may be made identical to the radar coordinate system to simplify calculation or identical to a radar coordinate system of one of the radar devices of a multi-radar system. However, it may be desirable to define the universal coordinate system based on permanent physical features present in the field of view 110 so that the system 100 may be recalibrated with reference to these permanent physical features as necessary. For example, the coordinate system may be based on a horizontal axis extending from a center of the green 106 to a center of an end line of the green 106. Thus, if the radar device 102 is moved, it may be readily recalibrated to accurately correlate position and trajectory of objects to the features of the green 106.


The flow chart of FIG. 2 shows a method 300 of operation implemented by the computer 202, which method is repeated at each time interval for which the measurements are taken. For example, in an exemplary system, the computer 200 may perform the method of FIG. 2 every 10 ms (or 100 times per second). For each time interval, in step 310, the computer 202 receives data from the radar device 102 and transmits to the computer raw Doppler radar data. In step 320, the computer 202 calculates a Doppler frequency spectrum 204, for example, by using the fast Fourier transform (FFT), as shown in FIGS. 4A, 5A for multiple time intervals forming a spectrogram. In step 330, the computer 202 uses known techniques to identify local intensity maxima from the Doppler frequency spectrum 204. As would be understood by those skilled in the art, velocity data for the object 112 represented in the radar data is then calculable at each identified point in time. In step 340, the computer 202 then calculates a resulting graph of the velocity of the object 112 as a function of time, as shown in FIGS. 4B, 5B. As would be understood by those skilled in the art, the slope of the velocity graph corresponds to an acceleration or deceleration of the object 112, as shown in FIGS. 4C, 5C, and the area under the slope corresponds to a distance the object 112 has traveled. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the higher the Doppler radar transmit frequency, the higher the velocity resolution for the same observation time. A high velocity resolution may be desired to track putts which appear at low velocities—generally less than 10 m/s—and to separate the ball from other objects in the field, i.e. putter head, putter shaft and golfer. An exemplary velocity resolution of less than 0.25 m/s is preferable. The high velocity resolution is useful also with short observation times (e.g., 0.100 seconds or less) to enable accurate tracking of velocity jumps to identify transitions between bouncing, sliding and/or rolling states of the ball, the observation time being the time span for each. For example, good tracking has been accomplished with X band frequencies as low as (8-12 GHz). In an exemplary embodiment, a higher frequency of more than 20 GHz may be used to enhance the accuracy of the identification of transitions between bouncing, sliding and rolling states and to track balls at lower velocities. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that using a transmit frequency lower than 8 GHz is also possible although this may make it more challenging to accurately track velocity as a function of time in practical situations.


In this embodiment, the computer 202 performs the method 400 of FIG. 3 at each time interval to identify movement as relevant to the system (i.e., distinguish between the object 112 and birds, leaves and other items moving through the field of view 110) and to segment the velocity of the object 112 into specific velocity intervals. That is, a segment is defined as a time interval during which the velocity is continuous and has a continuous derivative. As would be understood by those skilled in the art, moving items which do not follow the pattern associated with movement of a putted ball (i.e. golf club, golfer, leaves, birds) are detected and eliminated from analysis. In step 410 the computer 202 tracks the velocity of the object 112 over time, as well as the derivative of the velocity, i.e. the deceleration (negative acceleration) of the object. For example, the computer 202 tracks the velocity starting at time 0, which is the first detected moment of contact between the putter and the ball. In step 420, discontinuity detection is implemented to detect any discontinuity in the velocity and/or the derivative thereof (acceleration). In an exemplary embodiment, the discontinuity may be detected by the processor for any time at which a change in velocity or derivative jump from one data point to an adjacent data point is greater than a set threshold. For example, an exemplary threshold value for velocity discontinuity may be a change of 0.05 m/s while and exemplary threshold value for acceleration discontinuity may be a change of 0.2 m/s2. If a discontinuity is detected, the computer 202 designates the continuous portion between this discontinuity and an immediately previous discontinuity (or time 0) as a first segment and the segment is saved. For example, in FIG. 4B, the first segment extends from 0 to TB1, where a change in the slope of the velocity is determined to be a discontinuity. In step 440, the computer determines whether the end velocity of the first segment is greater than 0 at TB1. If so, the computer returns to step 420 and continues to track the velocity, starting at TB1. The method is repeated until the velocity reaches 0 at time Tlastdata, (or a velocity below which tracking device 102 is unable to track the object 112) with the computer 202 saving each segment of the velocity between adjacent discontinuities.


When the velocity of the object 112 drops below the minimum level detectably by the particular tracking device(s) being used, the velocity of the object 112 may be extrapolated by extending the slope of the velocity during the last segment detected by the radar device 102, as shown in FIGS. 4B, 5B to a zero velocity. For example, in FIG. 4B the slope of the velocity from Tskid to Tlastdata, Tlastdata being the point at which the tracking device 102 last detected the velocity of the object 112, is simply extended from Tlastdata to Tend, where Tend is the time at which the object stopped moving. Those skilled in the art will understand that once an object 112 begins to roll, the deceleration, or change in velocity over time, will be relatively constant (except as influenced by the sloping of the surface of the green).


As shown in FIG. 6, for each segmented portion, the computer 202 analyzes the slope of the velocity to determine the state of the object 112 (i.e. slide, bounce or roll, during the segments time interval). For a rolling ball on a flat green, the minimum slope of a graph of velocity/time is approximately −0.35 m/s2 while the maximum slope is approximately −1.4 m/s2. The slope associated with a sliding ball on a flat green is typically a factor 4 more negative than the rolling ball, such as, for example, from −1.4 m/s2 to −5.6 m/s2, while the slope of a bouncing ball lies between 0.1 and −0.5 m/s2. Those skilled in the art will understand that these figures are exemplary only and may vary depending on various factors such as, for example, the surface the object is moving on (e.g., length and characteristics of the grass, the size of the object, and whether the surface inclines or declines, wind peed and direction, etc.) as well as spin of the ball during bouncing and sliding. Since, generally, the ball ultimately ends in a rolling state before stopping, it is recommended to analyze the decelerations at the last segment and use this to establish the rolling acceleration threshold as well as the sliding acceleration threshold.


If the green is not flat, a component of gravity acceleration may be added to the ball equaling sin(α)*G during sliding and rolling states of the ball, where α is the inclination of the ground relative to the waterline in the direction of the putt and G is the gravity acceleration on earth (9.81 m/s2). For an even better thresholding between sliding and rolling state determination of the ball, the acceleration used for determining sliding or rolling states of the ball for non-bounce segments could be compensated as Aslope_corrected=Ameasured−sin(α)*G, where a is positive if the green 106 slopes downhill and negative if the green 106 slopes uphill in the direction of travel of the object 112. If the tracking system is capable of measuring the height of the object as a function of distance traveled, this can be used to calculate the slope α at any given time, as can be seen in FIG. 8. Alternatively, the slope may be predetermined.


Those skilled in the art will understand that a putted ball 112 will always start in either a slide or a bounce state—i.e., a ball putted from rest will not immediately be rolling on the green without sliding or bouncing. After a time, the ball 112 may begin to roll without sliding after which it will no longer slide and will only bounce if the ball 112 hits an object on the surface such as, for example, a stick, stone or piece of dirt. In step 510 a segment is analyzed to determine whether the slope of the segment is less than a threshold Aslide. Aslide is typically around −2 m/s2. If the slope is found to be less than Aslide and a previous segment was not a rolling state, the segment is determined to be a sliding state and the method moves to step 540. However, if the previous segment was a rolling state or slope is greater than Aslide, the computer 202 moves to step 520. In step 520, the segment is further analyzed to determine if the slope of the segment is less than a threshold Aroll, where Aroll is typically −0.5 m/s2. If the slope is found to be less than −0.5 m/s2, the segment is determined to be a rolling state and the method moves to step 540. If the slope is found to be greater than −0.5 m/s2, the computer 202 moves to step 530. In step 530, the computer 202 determines if the distance traveled R during this segment, corresponding to the area under the velocity vs. time segment, divided by the total distance traveled by the ball, Rtotal(Rbounce+Rslide+Rroll-tracked+Rroll-extrapolated), is greater than a threshold SRmax, where SRmax is typically 0.3. If yes, the segment is determined to be a rolling state. If not, the segment is determined to be a bounce state and the method moves to step 540. In step 540 the computer 202 determines whether there is another saved segment that has not yet been analyzed. If yes, the computer 202 analyses this next saved segment (e.g., the segment next in time after the previously analyzed segment) and proceeds through steps 510-540 again until every segment has been analyzed and the state associated with each segment has been established. In step 550, once all segments have been analyzed, the data may be provided to an output device 212 (e.g., a device adjacent to the putting green 106 or at any other location where a user may review the data) as shown n FIG. 7. For example, this device 212 may be a screen displaying the data, a mobile device associated with a user located at the green 106, etc. As mentioned before, the thresholds Aslide and Aroll can be predetermined or adjusted according to the measured acceleration of the last segment Alast. Since the ball will in almost every case be rolling in the last segment, Alast will equal the acceleration of the rolling state Aroll. Consequently, a suitable threshold for Aroll will be around 0.5*Alast. Similarly, a suitable threshold for Aslide will be around 2*Alast.


In some instances, the user may wish to know the distance the object 112 traveled before it began a roll state—i.e. the distance the ball 112 bounced and/or slid before beginning to roll. Even though the procedures 400 and 500 in FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C, and 6 are aimed at finding every discontinuity in velocity and/or deceleration, this is not required. For example, a user may want to determine only a time and distance traveled up to the point in time at which the ball first enters the rolling state, without quantifying how many bounces and/or slide segments occurred before that. The computer 202 determines the distance by calculating a total area under each velocity versus time segment determined to be in a bounce or slide state. This distance data may then be forwarded to the device 212 and this distance may then be compared to a total length of the putt. As would be understood by those skilled in the art, this data forwarded to device 212 may include graphic data illustrating velocity of the object 112 along its trajectory, tabular data concerning variables such as launch speed, initial roll speed, distance covered of different segments, decelerations of segments, number of bounces, etc. A particularly interesting deceleration is the rolling state deceleration Arcorrected compensated for the slope of the ground over which the object rolls. This value is directly related to the “stimpmeter” reading of the green, which is a key figure for characterization of golf green speed conditions. A stimpmeter is a mechanical device used to launch a golf ball on the green with a well defined initial velocity V0 (approximately 1.94 m/s) in a state where the ball is fully rolling. The stimpmeter reading is the distance traveled by the ball on the green in feet. The stimpmeter reading can be determined from StimpMeter_ft=0.5*V02/Arcorrected/0.3048. Consequently, the present invention provides a very attractive way of determining the “stimpmeter” reading for a green.


Those skilled in the art will understand that although the previously described embodiments describe a golf ball being hit on a practice green, the above-described exemplary embodiments may be implemented to track the velocity and movement of any spherical object on any surface. For example, the system 100 may track putts on any green of a golf course, a chip golf shot hit onto a green, a full golf shot hit onto any portion of a golf course (e.g., rough, fairway, bunker, apron, green, etc.). In another exemplary embodiment, the described system 100 may also be used to track any other sports ball to compare the path of the ball to boundaries (e.g., to determine whether a hit baseball is fair or foul, whether a tennis shot is in or out, etc. Other applications include bowling and billiards (e.g., to determine when a bowling or billiards ball starts to roll after an initial period of sliding and/or bouncing) and soccer (e.g., to measure the bounce, slide and roll of a kick).


Those skilled in the art will understand that the above-described exemplary embodiments may be implemented in any suitable software or hardware configuration or combination thereof. An exemplary hardware platform for implementing the exemplary embodiments may include, for example, an Intel x86 based platform with compatible operating system, a Windows platform, a Linux platform, a Mac platform and Mac OS, a mobile device having an operating system such as iOS, Android, etc. In a further example, the exemplary embodiments of the above described method may be embodied as a program containing lines of code stored on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium that may be executed on a processor or microprocessor.


It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made in the present disclosure, without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. Thus, it is intended that the present disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalent.

Claims
  • 1. A system for tracking a velocity of an object, comprising: a first tracking device aimed so that a first field of view of the first tracking device covers at least a portion of a target volume into which an object is to be launched from a launch location; anda processor receiving data from the first tracking device and identifying from the data velocity data of the object over time, the processor identifying a first transition point in the velocity data as a point at which a change in one of a velocity and an acceleration of the object is greater than a set threshold, the processor identifying the first transition point as a first point at which the object transitions from a first one of a bouncing state and a sliding state to a second one of the bouncing state, the sliding state and a rolling state.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein for each of a plurality of time frames, the processor receives from the first tracking device a signal and calculates from this signal the data including velocity values for the object.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor identifies a second transition point in the velocity data, later in time than the first transition point, as a second point at which a change in one of the velocity and the acceleration of the object is greater than the set threshold, the processor identifying the second transition point as a second point at which the object transitions from a first one of the bouncing state, the sliding state and the rolling state to a second one of the bouncing state, the sliding state and the rolling state, the processor identifying a plurality of segments of motion of the object wherein a first segment extends prior to the first transition point, a second segment is between the first and second transition points, and a third segment extends subsequent to the second transition point.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein each of the plurality of segments is identified as one of the bouncing state, the sliding state and the rolling state based in part on a slope of the velocity of the segment.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein, when the slope of the velocity of the segment is less than a first predetermined threshold the object is determined to be in the sliding state for the given segment unless, for a segment prior in time to the segment, the object is determined to have been in the rolling state.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein, when the slope of the velocity of the segment is less than a second predetermined threshold, the object is determined to be in the rolling state for the given segment.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, wherein, when the slope of the velocity of the segment is greater than the second predetermined threshold and a distance traveled during the segment divided by a total distance traveled by the object is not greater than a third predetermined threshold, the object is determined to be in a bouncing state for the segment.
  • 8. The system of claim 4, wherein a distance the object has traveled in the one of the bouncing, sliding or rolling state is determined by calculating the area under the respective bouncing, sliding and rolling segment(s) of the velocity vs. time curve.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor identifies transition points as time separators between adjacent segments.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the first tracking device is a continuous wave Doppler radar.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein a first radar transmit frequency is between 10 and 125 GHz.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, further comprising a second tracking device aimed so that a second field of view of the second tracking device covers at least a portion of the target volume including a portion of the target volume outside the first field of view.
  • 13. A method for tracking a movement of an object, comprising: positioning a first tracking device aimed so that a first field of view of the first tracking device covers at least a portion of a target volume into which an object is to be launched from a launch location;determining, using a processor, based on data received from the first tracking device, a velocity value of the object at each of a plurality of time points to generate a velocity curve as a function of the velocity values over time;identifying transition points in the velocity curve as points at which a change in one of the velocity value of the object and a derivative of the velocity curve is greater than a set threshold; andseparating the velocity curve into a plurality of segments, wherein each segment is identified as one of a bouncing state, a sliding state and a rolling state based in part on a slope of the velocity curve of the segment, wherein the transition points are points at which the object transitions from a first one of the bouncing state and the sliding state to a second one of the bouncing state, the sliding state and the rolling state.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising: determining a distance the object traveled in one of the segments by calculating an area under the velocity curve in the segment.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the first radar transmit frequency is between 10 and 125 GHz.
US Referenced Citations (239)
Number Name Date Kind
3025520 Werner et al. Mar 1962 A
3264643 Nilssen Aug 1966 A
3324468 Knepper Jun 1967 A
3540054 Broderick Nov 1970 A
3777665 Ziemba Dec 1973 A
3798644 Constant Mar 1974 A
3798795 Michelsen Mar 1974 A
3856237 Torian et al. Dec 1974 A
3974740 Billottet et al. Aug 1976 A
3981010 Michelsen Sep 1976 A
3982713 Martin Sep 1976 A
3992708 Olson et al. Nov 1976 A
4015258 Smith et al. Mar 1977 A
4050068 Berg et al. Sep 1977 A
4264907 Durand, Jr. et al. Apr 1981 A
4477814 Brumbaugh et al. Oct 1984 A
4509052 Cash Apr 1985 A
4545576 Harris Oct 1985 A
4563005 Hand et al. Jan 1986 A
4622554 Gellekink et al. Nov 1986 A
4638320 Eggert et al. Jan 1987 A
4639733 King et al. Jan 1987 A
4713686 Ozaki et al. Dec 1987 A
4717916 Adams et al. Jan 1988 A
4751511 Komata et al. Jun 1988 A
4780719 Frei et al. Oct 1988 A
5018218 Peregrim et al. May 1991 A
5056791 Poillon et al. Oct 1991 A
5092602 Witler et al. Mar 1992 A
5134409 Groot Jul 1992 A
5138322 Nuttall Aug 1992 A
5150895 Berger Sep 1992 A
5241317 Howard Aug 1993 A
5246232 Eccher et al. Sep 1993 A
5290037 Witler et al. Mar 1994 A
5319373 Maxwell et al. Jun 1994 A
5341142 Reis et al. Aug 1994 A
5342051 Rankin et al. Aug 1994 A
5357255 Giraudy Oct 1994 A
5375832 Witler et al. Dec 1994 A
5401026 Eccher et al. Mar 1995 A
5404144 Vlannes Apr 1995 A
5406290 James et al. Apr 1995 A
5413345 Nauck May 1995 A
5486002 Witler et al. Jan 1996 A
5489099 Rankin et al. Feb 1996 A
5495249 Chazelle et al. Feb 1996 A
5504312 Morrison et al. Apr 1996 A
5564698 Honey et al. Oct 1996 A
5609534 Gebhardt et al. Mar 1997 A
5631654 Karr May 1997 A
5652588 Miron Jul 1997 A
5657027 Guymon Aug 1997 A
5700204 Teder Dec 1997 A
5768151 Lowy et al. Jun 1998 A
5781505 Rowland Jul 1998 A
5796474 Squire et al. Aug 1998 A
5803823 Gobush et al. Sep 1998 A
5846139 Bair et al. Dec 1998 A
5862517 Honey et al. Jan 1999 A
5868578 Baum Feb 1999 A
5873040 Dunn et al. Feb 1999 A
5879246 Gebhardt et al. Mar 1999 A
5912700 Honey et al. Jun 1999 A
5917553 Honey et al. Jun 1999 A
5952957 Szu Sep 1999 A
5953077 Honey et al. Sep 1999 A
6042492 Baum Mar 2000 A
6057915 Squire et al. May 2000 A
6067039 Pyner et al. May 2000 A
6133946 Cavallaro et al. Oct 2000 A
6141060 Honey et al. Oct 2000 A
6154250 Honey et al. Nov 2000 A
6167355 Fiekowsky Dec 2000 A
6179720 Rankin et al. Jan 2001 B1
6198501 Nemiroff et al. Mar 2001 B1
6229550 Gloudemans et al. May 2001 B1
6239747 Kaminski May 2001 B1
6244971 Mihran Jun 2001 B1
6252632 Cavallaro Jun 2001 B1
6266005 Schneider Jul 2001 B1
6266100 Gloudemans et al. Jul 2001 B1
6292130 Cavallaro et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304665 Cavallaro et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320173 Vock et al. Nov 2001 B1
6371862 Reda Apr 2002 B1
6400306 Nohara et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421116 Schilli et al. Jul 2002 B1
6450442 Schneider et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456232 Milnes et al. Sep 2002 B1
6466275 Honey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6520864 Wilk Feb 2003 B1
6547671 Mihran Apr 2003 B1
6592465 Lutz Jul 2003 B2
6597406 Gloudemans et al. Jul 2003 B2
6621561 Holton Sep 2003 B2
6657584 Cavallaro et al. Dec 2003 B2
6728637 Ford et al. Apr 2004 B2
6744403 Milnes et al. Jun 2004 B2
6764412 Gobush et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774932 Ewing et al. Aug 2004 B1
6778148 Pack et al. Aug 2004 B1
6791217 Collier-Hallman et al. Sep 2004 B2
6816185 Harmath Nov 2004 B2
6864886 Cavallaro et al. Mar 2005 B1
6903676 Frady Jun 2005 B1
6909438 White et al. Jun 2005 B1
6956523 Mohan Oct 2005 B2
6965397 Honey et al. Nov 2005 B1
6989789 Ferreol et al. Jan 2006 B2
7026990 Cooper et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031873 Song Apr 2006 B2
7075556 Meier et al. Jul 2006 B1
7116342 Dengler et al. Oct 2006 B2
7132975 Fullerton et al. Nov 2006 B2
7133801 Song Nov 2006 B2
7154540 Honey et al. Dec 2006 B2
7161733 Fukata et al. Jan 2007 B2
7183966 Schramek et al. Feb 2007 B1
7213442 Workman May 2007 B2
7221794 Gloudemans, II et al. May 2007 B1
7321330 Sajima Jan 2008 B2
7333047 Fullerton et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341530 Cavallaro et al. Mar 2008 B2
7492363 Meier et al. Feb 2009 B2
7497780 Kiraly Mar 2009 B2
7680301 Pendleton et al. Mar 2010 B2
7750901 Meier et al. Jul 2010 B2
7822229 Pendleton et al. Oct 2010 B2
7868914 Dengler et al. Jan 2011 B2
7894669 Gloudemans, II et al. Feb 2011 B2
7928976 Meier et al. Apr 2011 B2
8016653 Pendleton et al. Sep 2011 B2
8049750 Gloudemans et al. Nov 2011 B2
8054216 Kinoshita et al. Nov 2011 B2
8073190 Gloudemans et al. Dec 2011 B2
8077917 Forsgren Dec 2011 B2
8077981 Elangovan et al. Dec 2011 B2
8085188 Tuxen Dec 2011 B2
8149156 Allred et al. Apr 2012 B1
8154633 Gloudemans et al. Apr 2012 B2
8189857 Johnson et al. May 2012 B2
8253799 Elangovan et al. Aug 2012 B2
8335345 White et al. Dec 2012 B2
8385658 Elangovan et al. Feb 2013 B2
8400346 Hubbard et al. Mar 2013 B2
8401304 Cavallaro et al. Mar 2013 B2
8451265 Gloudemans et al. May 2013 B2
8456526 Gloudemans et al. Jun 2013 B2
8456527 Elangovan et al. Jun 2013 B2
8457392 Cavallaro et al. Jun 2013 B2
8461965 Chen et al. Jun 2013 B2
8466913 Gloudemans et al. Jun 2013 B2
8441476 Gloudemans et al. Jul 2013 B2
8558883 Cavallaro et al. Oct 2013 B2
8659663 Elangovan et al. Feb 2014 B2
8665153 Nakagawa et al. Mar 2014 B2
8705799 White et al. Apr 2014 B2
8786415 Cavallaro et al. Jul 2014 B2
8845442 Tuxen Sep 2014 B2
8866665 Suzuki Oct 2014 B2
8884741 Cavallaro et al. Nov 2014 B2
8912945 Tuxen Dec 2014 B2
8977585 Cavallaro et al. Mar 2015 B2
9007463 Elangovan et al. Apr 2015 B2
9024810 Lohbihler May 2015 B2
9036864 Johnson et al. May 2015 B2
9041722 Gloudemans et al. May 2015 B2
9215383 Milnes et al. Dec 2015 B2
9473748 Elangovan et al. Oct 2016 B2
9500743 Reid et al. Nov 2016 B2
9555284 Vollbrecht et al. Jan 2017 B2
9625321 Cavallaro et al. Apr 2017 B2
9645235 Tuxen May 2017 B2
9905082 Dengler et al. Feb 2018 B2
20020075475 Holton Jun 2002 A1
20020107078 Collins Aug 2002 A1
20020114493 McNitt et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030027655 Lutz et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030076255 Ono Apr 2003 A1
20030103684 Gobush et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040032363 Schantz et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040032970 Kiraly Feb 2004 A1
20040156035 Rogers Aug 2004 A1
20040178945 Buchanan Sep 2004 A1
20040248662 Gobush et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050030222 Steudel Feb 2005 A1
20050030333 Takahashi et al. Feb 2005 A1
20060092075 Bruce et al. May 2006 A1
20060164439 Dengler et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060169932 Fukata et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070167247 Lindsay Jul 2007 A1
20070291987 Saka et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070293331 Tuxen Dec 2007 A1
20080018519 Berg et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021651 Seeley et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080048907 Matsuura et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080068463 Claveau et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080182685 Marty Jul 2008 A1
20080199043 Forsgren Aug 2008 A1
20080139330 Tuxen Oct 2008 A1
20080261711 Tuxen Oct 2008 A1
20090295624 Tuxen Dec 2009 A1
20100029415 Lindsay Feb 2010 A1
20110250939 Hobler Oct 2011 A1
20110286632 Tuxen Nov 2011 A1
20110304497 Molyneux et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120101711 Furmston et al. Apr 2012 A1
20130039538 Johnson et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130158966 Baek Jun 2013 A1
20130271323 Joo et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130274025 Luciano, Jr. et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130346009 Winter et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140191896 Johnson et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140347212 Tuxen Nov 2014 A1
20150105173 Thurman Apr 2015 A1
20150234045 Rosenblum et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160047889 Takahashi et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160162160 Dengler et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160170015 Tuxen Jun 2016 A1
20160202353 Saegusa et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160243423 Tuxen et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160247292 Tuxen et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160292865 Floor et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160306035 Johnson Oct 2016 A1
20160306036 Johnson Oct 2016 A1
20160306037 Johnson Oct 2016 A1
20160307335 Perry et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160313441 Tuxen Oct 2016 A1
20160320476 Johnson Nov 2016 A1
20160327642 Saegusa et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160339320 Johnson et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160367861 Pelz Dec 2016 A1
20170259115 Hall Sep 2017 A1
20170270354 Painter Sep 2017 A1
20170333777 Spivak et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180005492 Hall Jan 2018 A1
20180011184 Du Toit et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180175495 Bennett et al. Jun 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
2620991 Mar 1977 DE
102005046085 Mar 2007 DE
0116183 Dec 1983 EP
0116183 Aug 1984 EP
0529489 Mar 1993 EP
1158270 Nov 2001 EP
2283144 Apr 1995 GB
2294403 May 1996 GB
2319834 Jun 1998 GB
2380682 Apr 2003 GB
S59137873 Aug 1984 JP
H06126015 May 1994 JP
H06213989 Aug 1994 JP
H08266701 Oct 1996 JP
2000230974 Aug 2000 JP
2001305528 Oct 2001 JP
2003098255 Apr 2003 JP
3870233 Jan 2007 JP
2007163321 Jun 2007 JP
2008249354 Oct 2008 JP
4388639 Dec 2009 JP
2012068139 Apr 2012 JP
1990008936 Aug 1990 WO
1991006348 May 1991 WO
1993004382 Mar 1993 WO
1999027384 Jun 1999 WO
2000062090 Oct 2000 WO
2002025303 Mar 2002 WO
2003005281 Jan 2003 WO
2003032006 Apr 2003 WO
2004031680 Apr 2004 WO
2005017553 Feb 2005 WO
2005081014 Sep 2005 WO
2005116678 Dec 2005 WO
2006002639 Jan 2006 WO
2006002640 Jan 2006 WO
2008038005 Apr 2008 WO
2010086414 Aug 2010 WO
2010125790 Nov 2010 WO
2011092813 Aug 2011 WO
2016036351 Mar 2016 WO
2016110757 Jul 2016 WO
2018138708 Aug 2018 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
17th Century mathematics—Newton. Accessed Jan. 22, 2019 at <https://www.storyofmathematics.com/17th_newton.html> (Year: 1687).
Ruoyo et al., “Radar Reflected Signal Process of High Spinning Rate Projectiles”, The Eighth International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, 2007, pp. 3-982-985.
Wei et al., “A New Method for Spin Estimation Using the Data of Doppler Radar”, ICSP, 2000, pp. 1911-1914.
Masuda et al., “Measurement of Initial Conditions of a Flying Golf Ball”, WEAM 4-4, 1994, pp. 344-347.
Christensen et al., “Doppler-Surface Mapping Technique for Characterisation of Spinning Cylinders Illuminated by Radar”, A&E Systems Magazine, Aug. 2005, pp. 19-24.
Ong et al., “Signal-Adapted Wavelets for Doppler Radar System”, Seventh Annual Conference on Control, Dec. 2002, pp. 19-23.
“Technology”, Zelocity, Golf Performance Monitors, Copyright 2004-2006, Retrieved Jun. 9, 2010.
“3D Doppler Ball Tracking Monitors, Golf Radars and Launch Monitors”, Flightscope, Copyright 2009, Retrieved Jun. 9, 2010.
Lolck, “TERMA Elektronik AS: Doppler Radar Spin Measurement”, Brochure, 1986.
“DR 5000 User's Guide: DR 5000 Spin Calculation”, DR 5000 User's Guide, 2004, pp. 27-45 and 48-59.
Bosse et al., “Improved radar tracking using a multipath model: maximum likelihood compared with eigenvector analysis”, IEEE Proc. Radar, Sonar Navig., Aug. 1994, vol. 141, No. 4, pp. 213-222.
Blackaby, “Simultaneous RF/EO tracking and characterization of dismounts”, MSc Thesis, 2008, 52 Sheets.
Fasano et al., “Radar/electro-optical data fusion for non-cooperative UAS sense and avoid”, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, vol. 46, pp. 436-450.
Warthman; Technical Note D-1138: Project Echo—Boresight Cameras for recording antenna point accuracy; NASA, Sep. 1961, 14 sheets.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180120428 A1 May 2018 US