Not applicable.
Not applicable.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to medical devices and systems, and more particularly to medical devices for measuring skin characteristics that can vary on a patient-by-patient basis.
2. Description of the Related Art
The selectivity of the input impedance of an electronic system used in a medical environment is an important, though somewhat under emphasized feature of the overall monitoring device. As the sensitivity of electronic monitoring systems increase, it becomes increasingly important to consider the inaccuracy of measurements created by offset and gain errors caused by unknown or changing skin/electrode impedances. The effect is often significant enough to create an inability to monitor important electrical events during medical procedures. In several medical monitoring applications, an independent measurement of the patient skin/electrode impedance is made before initiation of electrical monitoring, to attempt to correct for the anticipated error caused by the impedance uncertainty. Even in the event of a pre-monitoring impedance measurement, no hardware or software solution exists to correct for the induced error. Furthermore, it has been established that the skin/electrode impedance can, and often does, change during an extended monitoring process. The present invention discloses a hardware/embedded software solution to continuously monitor the skin/electrode impedance and alter the input impedance of the monitoring circuitry to adapt to the changing mismatch between the patient and the electronics. The present invention can be implemented in a continuous monitoring mode or time defined monitoring mode to allow either real-time implementation of the impedance matching or predefined matching based upon the accuracy required by the medical procedure. Furthermore, the hardware matching circuitry can be implemented to provide a user defined impedance matching resolution through the addition of more resistors in the resistor ladder network.
Therefore, there remains a need for an improved system and method to match skin impedance under varying conditions.
The present invention relates to a system for measuring the input impedance of a skin/electrode interface and selectively modifying the input impedance of the monitoring circuit to match the measured input impedance. The invention can provide a simplified method to an operator for correcting for input impedance mismatch between electronic monitoring circuitry and the skin/electrode interface than heretofore is believed to have been available. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, an input impedance measuring circuit will interface with a microprocessor and a reconfigurable switch network to select the input impedance of the electronic monitoring circuitry, thus reducing the effect of impedance sensitivity of electrical instruments, such as EMG or EKG instruments.
A more particular description, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments illustrated in the appended drawings, forming part of the present specification and described herein. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only some embodiments described herein and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the disclosure's scope, in that there can be other equally effective embodiments.
The present invention provides an impedance matching system and method that can provide relatively stable, impedance independent output voltages to electrical circuitry. The circuit can measure the skin impedance of a medical patient when each patient may have a different resistance than another patient. The invention can also provide a selectable accuracy based upon the number and value of resistors in the resistor ladder network. A microprocessor based control mechanism can activate the ladder network. In general, the system includes a first matching module or mode and a second sensing module or mode. The matching depends on the particular skin impedance detected and the switching of various resistors to match the skin impedance. The sensing mode, using the matched value of resistors generally for each electrode for a given circuit for the skin, is used to sense the relevant voltages through the skin and provide the voltage to a medical device for monitoring, analysis, or other medical procedure.
In the present invention, an advantageous mode of operation is described briefly referencing the elements in
The microprocessor creates a set of control signals 203 in
The figures described above and the written description of specific structures and processes below are not presented to limit the scope of what Applicants have invented or the scope of the appended claims. Rather, the Figures and written description are provided to teach any person skilled in the art to make and use the inventions for which patent protection is sought. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that not all features of a commercial implementation of the inventions are described or shown for the sake of clarity and understanding. Persons of skill in this art also appreciate that the development of an actual commercial embodiment incorporating aspects of the present inventions will require numerous implementation-specific decisions to achieve the developer's ultimate goal for the commercial embodiment. Such implementation-specific decisions may include, and likely are not limited to, compliance with system-related, business-related, government-related and other constraints, which may vary by specific implementation, location and from time to time. While a developer's efforts might be complex and time-consuming in an absolute sense, such efforts would be, nevertheless, a routine undertaking for those of skill this art having benefit of this disclosure. The inventions disclosed and taught herein are susceptible to numerous and various modifications and alternative forms. Further, the use of a singular term, such as, but not limited to, “a,” is not intended as limiting of the number of items. The use of relational terms, such as, but not limited to, “top,” “bottom,” “left,” “right,” “upper,” “lower,” “down,” “up,” “side,” and the like are used in the written description for clarity in specific reference to the Figures and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or the appended claims. The term “coupled,” “coupling,” “coupler,” and like terms are used broadly herein and can include any method or device for securing, binding, bonding, fastening, attaching, joining, inserting therein, forming thereon or therein, communicating, or otherwise associating, for example, mechanically, magnetically, electrically, chemically, directly or indirectly with intermediate elements or by wireless transmission, one or more pieces of members together and can further include without limitation integrally forming one functional member with another in a unity fashion. The coupling can occur in any direction, including rotationally.
Other and further embodiments utilizing one or more aspects of the inventions described above can be devised without departing from the spirit of Applicant's invention. For example and without limitation, other embodiments of the system and method can include manual selection of the resistance values, and other embodiments can include a variable resistor that can be adjusted to match the skin impedance. Further, the embodiments can be combined to produce other variations. Discussion of singular elements can include plural elements and vice-versa.
The order of steps can occur in a variety of sequences unless otherwise specifically limited. The various steps described herein can be combined with other steps, interlineated with the stated steps, and/or split into multiple steps. Similarly, elements have been described functionally and can be embodied as separate components or can be combined into components having multiple functions.
The inventions have been described in the context of preferred and other embodiments and not every embodiment of the invention has been described. Obvious modifications and alterations to the described embodiments are available to those of ordinary skill in the art. The disclosed and undisclosed embodiments are not intended to limit or restrict the scope or applicability of the invention conceived of by the Applicants, but rather, in conformity with the patent laws, Applicants intend to protect fully all such modifications and improvements that come within the scope or range of equivalent of the following claims. Further, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise” or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, should be understood to imply the inclusion of at least the stated element or step or group of elements or steps or equivalents thereof, and not the exclusion of a greater numerical quantity or any other element or step or group of elements or steps or equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/916,202, filed May 4, 2007 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3703168 | Frink | Nov 1972 | A |
4256118 | Nagel | Mar 1981 | A |
4299234 | Epstein et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4308873 | Maynard | Jan 1982 | A |
4577640 | Hofmeister | Mar 1986 | A |
4738268 | Kipnis | Apr 1988 | A |
4781200 | Baker | Nov 1988 | A |
4945917 | Akselrod et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4967761 | Nathanielsz | Nov 1990 | A |
5042499 | Frank et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5057783 | Gubisch | Oct 1991 | A |
5205296 | Dukes et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5209237 | Rosenthal | May 1993 | A |
5217022 | Nathanielsz | Jun 1993 | A |
5301680 | Rosenberg | Apr 1994 | A |
5372139 | Holls et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5397344 | Garfield et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400799 | Yoches | Mar 1995 | A |
5447526 | Karsdon | Sep 1995 | A |
5483970 | Rosenberg | Jan 1996 | A |
5522877 | Garfield et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546953 | Garfield | Aug 1996 | A |
5568815 | Raynes et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5581369 | Righter et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5606978 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623939 | Garfield | Apr 1997 | A |
5776073 | Garfield et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785664 | Rosenberg | Jul 1998 | A |
5791342 | Woodard | Aug 1998 | A |
5964789 | Karsdon | Oct 1999 | A |
5991649 | Garfield et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002957 | Finneran | Dec 1999 | A |
6134466 | Rosenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6290657 | Adams | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6421558 | Huey et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434420 | Taheri | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6529569 | Corp et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6748263 | Griffiths et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6816744 | Garfield et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823211 | Simpson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6879858 | Adams | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6887239 | Elstrom et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7333850 | Marossero et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7447542 | Calderon et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468032 | Stahmann et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7532923 | Hayes-Gill et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7616980 | Meyer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7689275 | Hindenburg | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7758522 | Pandit | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7828753 | Euiano et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7925323 | Meyer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20020193670 | Garfield et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20050010127 | Calderon et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050168343 | Longsdorf et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060015033 | Blakley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060189882 | Thomas | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070213627 | James et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080123771 | Cranford et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080139967 | Euliano et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183092 | Smith et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080275316 | Fink et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090036787 | James et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090192396 | Hayes-Gill et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100004548 | Rytky | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
03090366 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Demianczuk et al., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 149, No. 5, pp. 484-491 pp. 485-491 (Jul. 1, 1984). |
Devedeux, Marque, Duchene, Germain, Mansour, “Uterine Electromyography: A Critical Review,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 169:1636-1653, 1993. |
Dill and Maiden, “The Electrical Potentials of the Human Uterus in Labor,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 52:735-745, 1946. |
Steer, “The Electrical activity of the Human Uterus in Normal and Abnormal Labor,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 68:867-890, 1954. |
Halliday and Heyns, “Uterine Activity and Electrical Response,” J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp. 62:155-161, 1955. |
Hon and Davis, “Cutaneous and Uterine Electrical Potentials in Labor—an Experiment,” Obstet. Gynec. 12:47-53, 1958. |
Margue et al., “Uterine EHG Processing for Obstetrical Monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-33(12):1182-1186, Dec. 1986. |
Larks SD, Dasgupta K.; “Wave Forms of the Electrohysterogram in Pregnancy and Labor,” Am J Obstet Gynecol, May 1958; 75(5):1069-78. |
Lucovnik M, Maner WL, Chambliss LR, Blumrick R, Balducci J, Novak-Antolic Z, Garfield RE. “Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery,” Am J Obstet Gynecol. Mar. 2011; 204(3):228.e1-10; Epub Dec 8, 2010. |
Garfield RE, Maner WL, Mackay LB, Schlembach D, Saade GR.; “Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients,” Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul. 2005;193(1):23-9. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080275316 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60916202 | May 2007 | US |