Patent Application
20240042638
The present invention relates to a skin treatment sheet comprising a substrate with a plurality of apertures wherein the apertures have a first and second inner perimeter and a cutting edge along at least a portion of the first inner perimeter. The skin treatment sheet has a total cutting length which is the total length of all portions of the first perimeter in each aperture that contain a cutting edge and a total aperture area wherein the ratio of total aperture area to total cutting length is in a predefined range from 0.08 to 2.0 mm. Moreover, the present invention also relates to a skin treatment device comprising this skin treatment sheet.
Traditional wet shave razors use linear steel blades to remove hair from the skin, for example known from DE 10 2004 052 068 A1. These wet shave razors produce a very close shave, where the hairs are cut either to skin level or below skin level, in the case of multi-blade razors. However, placing exposed blade edges onto the skin can result in damage to the skin and therefore irritation in particular if the skin bulges into the gaps between the blades.
In electric shaving devices, a foil acts as a barrier between the cutting element and the skin. These devices are often safer on the skin but produce a less close shave.
Skin treatment sheets aim to deliver both a close shave and an irritation free shave by placing a blade edge parallel to the skin and reducing the skin bulge by forming the cutting edges along the internal perimeter of a plurality of apertures, which are surrounded by a skin supporting substrate.
Skin treatment sheets, which comprise a plurality of apertures with enclosed cutting edges have been disclosed previously. However, the majority of these (for example U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,983 A) have been formed from a thin metal sheet whereby the manufacturing process produces enclosed cutting edges which protrude above the plane of the treatment sheet. In this case, these cutting edges become aggressive and result in poor safety and irritation for the consumer.
Furthermore, in the case of skin treatment sheets formed out of other materials the cutting edge itself may not have sufficient integrity to withstand multiple shaves (U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,124,511 B2 and 7,357,052 B2). For instance, it has been observed that cutting edges fabricated from silicon are brittle and pieces of the edge are breaking off or chipping out during use even if a layer of amorphous silicon oxide is applied to the cutting edge. The same observation has been made for cutting edges fabricated from ceramic materials that are sufficiently thin and sharp to cut hair.
The skin safety and hair removal efficiency resulting from the use of a skin treatment sheet containing a plurality of enclosed cutting edges is determined by the dimensions of the enclosed cutting edges, referred to herein as the apertures, the amount of skin support provided by the substrate material and the overall size of the treatment sheet.
The hair removal efficiency is determined by the total cutting length of the skin treatment sheet, which can be determined by summing the cutting lengths of all of the apertures on the treatment sheet. This total cutting length should be maximized to increase the cutting efficiency.
The safety of the shave is determined by the area of contact between the skin and the substrate of the skin treatment sheet. For a safe shave, the area of contact between the skin and the substrate of the skin treatment sheet should be maximized.
However, the prior art does not provide a satisfying compromise for maximizing the total cutting length and maximizing the area of contact between the skin and the substrate. In the prior art, the dimensions of cutting apertures in skin treatment sheets with a plurality of enclosed cutting edges are disclosed, however the prior art does not disclose how to adequately balance the need for safety and hair removal efficiency. In the case of GB 2580088 A and DE 20 2019 100 514 U1 the size of the enclosed cutting edges is disclosed but whilst the open area formed within the perimeter of the enclosed cutting edge will provide a safe shave, the open area is too small to allow effective feeding of the hair into the aperture therefore resulting in poor cutting efficiency.
To ensure a safe shave, the blade edges must not exert high pressure on the skin.
This is often achieved in shaving devices that use linear steel blades by mounting the blades onto springs so that the blades deflect away from the user's skin when the pressure on the blade increases. However, this has the disadvantage that the geometrical arrangement of the cutting edges relative to the skin, e.g., the angle of the blade bevel relative to the skin contacting surface, moves away from the optimum geometry during the deflection thus resulting in less efficient cutting of hairs.
When using skin treatment sheets with apertures formed from thin metal, a reduction of pressure on the skin can be achieved by embedding the treatment sheet into a deformable substrate as disclosed in EP 0 276 066 A1 or skin treatment sheets as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,984,365 and WO1992/002342 are able to deform across the entire surface when the user presses the shaving device against the skin. However, the flexibility of flexible metallic treatment sheet alters the geometrical arrangement of the cutting edges relative to the skin thus resulting in less efficient cutting of hairs and hence no flexible treatment sheets are available for hair removal to date.
When using flexible treatment sheets, additional rigidity needs to be provided to avoid deformation during shaving. As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,984,365, this can be achieved by integrating supportive structures around the skin treatment sheet in the device assembly to prevent undesirable bending of the treatment sheet when the user presses the shaving device against the skin. However, these additional supportive components add complexity to the shaving device and provide additional areas onto which debris can collect and result in the device being more difficult to clean.
It was therefore the object of the present invention to provide a skin treatment sheet with a good balance between safety and hair removal efficiency. The skin treatment sheet has to offer a good mechanical stability, i.e. rigidity, which allows a long durability of the device. Moreover, it was an object to provide a treatment sheet which is rigid and does not deform in use to provide consistent blade geometry throughout the shave and to ensure easy and effective cleaning of the device to remove shaving debris.
This object is solved by the skin treatment sheet with the features of claim 1 and the skin treatment device of claim 19. The further dependent claims refer to preferred embodiments of the invention.
The term “comprising” in the claims and in the description of this application has the meaning that further components are not excluded. Within the scope of the present invention, the term “consisting of” should be understood as preferred embodiment of the term “comprising”. If it is defined that a group “comprises” at least a specific number of components, this should also be understood such that a group is disclosed which “consists” preferably of these components.
The following definitions are used for describing the present invention:
The area a1 of an aperture on the first surface of the skin treatment sheet is defined as the open area enclosed by the aperture perimeter r1.
The treatment sheet comprises a number n of apertures, each with an aperture area a1i (i=1 to n) on the first surface. The summation of all the aperture areas a1i for all n apertures results in the total aperture area A1 which is calculated according to the formula:
A1=Σi=1na1i, i=1 to n
The apertures have a cutting edge along at least a portion of the first inner perimeter. The cutting length l1i (i=1 to n) of an aperture on the first surface of the skin treatment sheet is defined as the length of the portion along the inner perimeter r1 where a cutting edge is provided within the aperture.
The skin treatment sheet comprises a number n of apertures, each with an aperture cutting length l1i. The summation of all the cutting length l1i for all n apertures results in the total cutting length L1 which is calculated according to the formula:
L1=Σi=1nl1i, i=1 to n
The skin treatment sheet has an outer treatment sheet perimeter R. The area enclosed by this outer perimeter is the total sheet area S.
The area of contact is the area of the skin treatment sheet which is in contact with the skin and is defined by the following formula:
Ac=S−A1
Closest Aperture Distance b1min
The skin treatment sheet comprises a number n of apertures. For each aperture i a closest adjacent aperture can be found. A straight line X′−″ starting on any point p′ located on the inner perimeter of a first aperture and ending on any point p″ located on the inner perimeter of a second aperture can be drawn. The shortest aperture separation b1i between aperture i and the closest adjacent aperture is defined as the length of the shortest line X′−″ that can be drawn in such a way between these two closest adjacent apertures. The minimum of all shortest aperture separations b1, is defined as b1min:
b1min=min(b1i) for i=1 to n
Cross Sectional Substrate Area ax
A vertical cross section taken through the skin treatment sheet along the line of b1min characterises an area ax that is bounded by b1min, a corresponding minimum aperture distance b2min on the second surface of the skin treatment sheet and two bevels that connect the inner perimeter on the first surface to the inner perimeter on the second surface.
The transparency T of a treatment sheet 40 is defined as the ratio of the total aperture area A1 divided by the total treatment sheet area S.
The treatment sheet 40 comprises a number n of apertures 430. The rim width W1 is the shortest distance that can be measured from the outer perimeter R to the inner perimeter r1 of any of the apertures adjacent to the outer perimeter R on the first surface.
According to the present invention a skin treatment sheet comprising a substrate with a plurality of n apertures is provided, wherein:
The skin contacting surface is the continuous surface defined by the first surface of the skin treatment sheet.
In
It is preferred that at least half of the n apertures, more preferably 80% of the n apertures and even more preferably all apertures have a cutting edge along at least a portion of the first inner perimeter.
It has been surprisingly found that the chosen ratio of the total aperture area A1 and the total cutting length L1 allows a good balance between safety and hair removal efficiency, i.e. the area of contact Ac (with Ac=S−A1) between the skin treatment sheet and the skin is large enough to prevent significant skin bulging into the apertures while the total cutting length L1 is large enough to allow for efficient cutting.
It is preferred that the area of contact Ac which is the difference of the total sheet are S and the total aperture area A1 is within a range of 50 to 600 mm2, preferably 150 to 450 mm2.
It is preferred that adjacent apertures have a shortest distance b1min on the first surface which is in the range of 0.1 to 3.5 mm, preferably 0.2 to 2.0 mm, more preferably 0.5 to 1.5 mm, and even more preferably 0.7 to 1.2 mm. By ensuring b1min has a value within this range, the skin treatment sheet can deliver an efficient and safe shave.
Furthermore, it has been found that the safety of the shave is affected by the transparency T. The solid substrate of the skin treatment sheet maintains contact with the skin during use and prevents excessive skin bulging into the apertures. When the transparency T of the skin treatment sheet is high, the skin is not sufficiently supported and is able to bulge into the apertures resulting in skin damage and irritation. The transparency T of the sheet is therefore preferably in the range from 5 to 60%, more preferably from 10 to 50%, and even more preferably from 15 to 30%.
It has been found that the overall size of the treatment sheet is critical for control and depends on the curvature and size of the skin area to be treated. The total sheet area S is preferably in the range from 100 to 800 mm2, more preferably from 200 to 600 mm2, and even more preferably from 250 to 480 mm2.
It is preferred that the total aperture area A1 is from 10 to 400 mm2, more preferably from 20 to 200 mm2, and even more preferably from 40 to 120 mm2.
According to a preferred embodiment the total cutting length L1 is in the range from 20 to 600 mm, more preferably from 30 to 400 mm, and even more preferably from 45 to 120 mm.
According to a preferred embodiment the ratio of the total aperture area A1 and the total cutting length L1 being A1:L1 ranges from 0.2 to 1.0 mm, more preferably from 0.25 to 0.8 mm, and even more preferably from 0.3 to 0.55 mm.
It is preferred that the aperture area a1 of the apertures ranges from 0.2 mm2 to 25 mm2, more preferably from 1 mm2 to 15 mm2, and even more preferably from 2 mm2 to 12 mm2.
According to a preferred embodiment the skin treatment sheet has a cross-sectional substrate area ax in the range from 0.01 to 1 mm2, preferably from 0.03 to 0.55 mm2, and more preferably from 0.1 to 0.3 mm2.
It is preferred that the skin treatment sheet has an outer perimeter R with a rim width W1 which is preferably in a range from 0.1 to 5.0 mm, more preferably from 0.5 to 3.0 mm, and even more preferably from 1.0 to 2.0 mm.
According to a preferred embodiment the first inner perimeter at the first surface is smaller than the second inner perimeter at the second surface. This allows for improved rinsing or clearing of debris, like hairs or dead skin. For a circular two-dimensional shape of the aperture this results in a conical thee-dimension aperture which is less susceptible to clogging of the aperture by hairs or dead skin.
The skin treatment sheet has preferably a thickness of 20 to 1000 μm, more preferably 30 to 500 μm, and even more preferably 50 to 300 μm.
The substrate has preferably from 5 to 200 apertures, more preferably from 10 to 120 apertures, and even more preferably from 15 to 80 apertures which corresponds to the number n, i.e. n ranges preferably from 5 to 200, more preferably from 10 to 120, and even more preferably from 15 to 80.
According to a preferred embodiment of the skin treatment sheet, the substrate comprises a first material, more preferably essentially consists of or consists of the first material.
According to another preferred embodiment the substrate comprises a first and a second material which is arranged adjacent to the first material. More preferably, the substrate essentially consists of or consists of the first and second material. The second material can be deposited as a coating at least in regions of the first material, i.e. the second material can be an enveloping coating of the first material, or a coating deposited on the first material on the first surface.
For optimal shaving it is necessary to have blades which are rigid to withstand deformation during shaving and blade edges which are strong to withstand the forces involved in hair cutting.
Conventional steel blades are made from thin strip material to form a blade bevel with a small angle to minimize the force to cut the hair. However, such blades are very flexible, and rigidity has to be provided by adding a blade support as a rigid frame onto which the thin blade edge is mounted. Without this support conventional steel blades formed from a thin metal strip would not be sufficiently rigid. The same applies to treatment sheets made from thin metal sheet as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,984,365 and WO1992/002342.
However, using thin metal cutting edges has the disadvantage that it requires complex assembly to ensure rigidity of the blades.
Skin treatment sheets formed from a material such as silicon are sufficiently rigid and enable simpler assembly. However, silicon blade edges that have small bevel angles to cut hairs at low force are very brittle and the edges will break under the forces required to cut hair, hence no silicon razor blades, or treatment sheets made from silicon are available for hair removal to date.
It was surprisingly found that the combination of a first and second material allows to provide cutting blades and treatment sheets, respectively, which are rigid to withstand deformation during shaving without needing any supporting structures. Furthermore, the cutting blades and treatment sheets, respectively, have blade edges which are strong to withstand the forces involved in hair cutting.
It is preferred that the first material is different from the second material, more preferably the second material has a higher hardness and/or a higher modulus of elasticity and/or a higher rupture stress than the first material.
The material of the first material is in general not limited to any specific material as long it is possible to bevel this material.
However, according to an alternative embodiment the skin treatment sheet comprises or consists only of the first material, i.e. an uncoated first material. In this case, the first material is preferably a material with an isotropic structure, i.e. having identical values of a property in all directions. Such isotropic materials are often better suited for shaping, independent from the shaping technology.
The first material preferably comprises or consists of a material selected from the group consisting of:
The steels used for the first material are preferably selected from the group consisting of 1095, 12C27, 14C28N, 154CM, 3Cr13MoV, 4034, 40X10C2M, 4116, 420, 440A, 440B, 440C, 5160, 5Cr15MoV, 8Cr13MoV, 95X18, 9Cr18MoV, Acuto+, ATS-34, AUS-4, AUS-6 (=6A), AUS-8 (=8A), C75, CPM-10V, CPM-3V, CPM-D2, CPM-M4, CPM-S-30V, CPM-S-35VN, CPM-S-60V, CPM-154, Cronidur-30, CTS 204P, CTS 20CP, CTS 40CP, CTS B52, CTS B75P, CTS BD-1, CTS BD-30P, CTS XHP, D2, Elmax, GIN-1, H1, N690, N695, Niolox (1.4153), Nitro-B, S70, SGPS, SK-5, Sleipner, T6MoV, VG-10, VG-2, X-15T.N., X50CrMoV15, ZDP-189.
It is preferred that the second material comprises or consists of a material selected from the group consisting of:
Moreover, all materials cited in the VDI guideline 2840 can be chosen for the second material.
The second material is preferably selected from the group consisting of TiB2, AlTiN, TiAlN, TiAlSiN, TiSiN, CrAl, CrAlN, AlCrN, CrN, TiN, TiCN and combinations thereof.
It is particularly preferred to use a second material of nano-crystalline diamond and/or multilayers of nano-crystalline and micro-crystalline diamond as second material. Relative to monocrystalline diamond, it has been shown that the production of nano-crystalline diamond, compared to the production of monocrystalline diamond, can be accomplished substantially more easily and economically. Moreover, with respect to their grain size distribution nano-crystalline diamond layers are more homogeneous than micro-crystalline diamond layers, the material also shows less inherent stress. Consequently, macroscopic distortion of the cutting edge is less probable.
It is preferred that the second material has a thickness of 0.15 to 20 μm, preferably 2 to 15 μm and more preferably 3 to 12 μm.
It is preferred that the second material has a modulus of elasticity (Young's modulus) of less than 1200 GPa, preferably less than 900 GPa, more preferably less than 750 GPa and even more preferably less than 500 GPa. Due to the low modulus of elasticity the hard coating becomes more flexible and more elastic. The Young's modulus is determined according to the method as disclosed in Markus Mohr et al., “Youngs modulus, fracture strength, and Poisson's ratio of nanocrystalline diamond films”, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 124308 (2014), in particular under paragraph III. B. Static measurement of Young's modulus.
The second material has preferably a transverse rupture stress σ0 of at least 1 GPa, more preferably of at least 2.5 GPa, and even more preferably at least 5 GPa.
With respect to the definition of transverse rupture stress σ0, reference is made to the following literature references:
The transverse rupture stress σ0 is thereby determined by statistical evaluation of breakage tests, e.g. in the B3B load test according to the above literature details. It is thereby defined as the breaking stress at which there is a probability of breakage of 63%.
Due to the extremely high transverse rupture stress of the second material the detachment of individual crystallites from the hard coating, in particular from the cutting edge, is almost completely suppressed. Even with long-term use, the cutting blade therefore retains its original sharpness.
The second material has preferably a hardness of at least 20 GPa. The hardness is determined by nanoindentation (Yeon-Gil Jung et. al., J. Mater. Res., Vol. 19, No. 10, p. 3076).
The second material has preferably a surface roughness RRMS of less than 100 nm, more preferably less than 50 nm, and even more preferably less than 20 nm, which is calculated according to:
The surface roughness Rids is determined according to DIN EN ISO 25178. The mentioned surface roughness makes additional mechanical polishing of the grown second material superfluous.
In a preferred embodiment, the second material has an average grain size d50 of the nano-crystalline diamond of 1 to 100 nm, preferably 5 to 90 nm, more preferably from 7 to 30 nm, and even more preferably 10 to 20 nm. The average grain size d50 is the diameter at which 50% of the second material is comprised of smaller particles. The average grain size d50 may be determined using X-ray diffraction or transmission electron microscopy and counting of the grains.
According to a preferred embodiment, the first material and/or the second material are coated at least in regions with a low-friction material, preferably selected from the group consisting of fluoropolymer materials like PTFE, parylene, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethyl methacrylate, graphite, diamond-like carbon (DLC) and combinations thereof.
Moreover, the apertures have a shape which is selected from the group consisting of circular, ellipsoidal, square, triangular, rectangular, trapezoidal, hexagonal, octagonal or combinations thereof.
The aperture area a1, is defined as the open area enclosed by the perimeter. The aperture area al, ranges preferably from 0.2 mm2 to 25 mm2, more preferably from 1 mm2 to 15 mm2, and even more preferably from 2 mm 2 to 12 mm2.
The cutting edge ideally has a round configuration which improves the stability of the cutting element. The cutting edge has preferably a tip radius TR of less than 200 nm, more preferably 1 to 200 nm, more preferably 10 to 100 nm and even more preferably 20 to 50 nm.
To cut hair efficiently, the tip of the cutting edge has to exert high pressure on the hair.
This is achieved in shaving devices that use linear steel blades by orienting the blade bevel at an angle relative to the skin contacting surface of the product resulting in cutting edges that protrude beyond the skin contacting surface and are exposed above the skin contacting surface towards the skin of the user. The same applies to treatment sheets formed out of thin metal as disclosed in WO1992/002342 where the blade edges are angled relative to the skin contacting surface and protrude beyond the skin contacting surface and are exposed above the skin contacting surface towards the skin of the user. However, this arrangement can also cut the skin and lead to skin irritation and discomfort, it is therefore not a safe shaving device and hence no treatment sheets with these blade arrangements are available for hair removal to date.
To be safe on skin, the skin facing side of the blade bevel must be coplanar with the skin contacting surface of the device, i.e., the edge must not be exposed above the skin contacting plane. Also, the tip of the cutting edge must be as close as possible to the skin, i.e., it should lie within the skin contacting surface, i.e., it should be coincident with the skin contacting surface. However, this reduces the tip pressure onto the hair and thus the cutting efficiency and therefore no treatment sheets with non-protruding blade edges made from a metallic material (Leonard) are available to date.
The tip pressure can be increased by making the blades “sharper” i.e., by reducing the tip radius. Such treatments sheets could be formed e.g. with silicon, however silicon is very brittle and sharp edges will break under the forces required to cut hair and hence no silicon treatment sheets are available for use to date.
It was surprisingly found that durable cutting edges are provided according to the present invention which are coplanar to the skin contacting surface and have a small tip radius of less than 200 nm.
It is preferred that the tip radius TR is coordinated to the average grain size d50 of the hard coating. It is hereby advantageous in particular if the ratio between the tip radius TR of the second material at the cutting edge and the average grain size d50 of the nanocrystalline diamond hard coating TR/d50 is from 0.03 to 20, preferably from 0.05 to 15, and particularly preferred from 0.5 to 10.
The skin treatment sheet according to the present invention may be used in the field of hair or skin removal, e.g. shaving, dermaplaning, callus skin removal.
Moreover, according to the present invention a skin treatment device is provided comprising the skin treatment sheet as defined above.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following figures which show specific embodiments according to the present invention. However, these specific embodiments shall not be interpreted in any limiting way with respect to the present invention as described in the claims and in the general part of the specification.
The skin treatment sheet 40 comprises a number n of apertures 430, 430′, 430″, etc., each with an aperture area a1i (i=1 to n) on the first surface 41. The area a1i is defined as the open area enclosed by the aperture perimeter r1i of aperture 430, 430′, 430″, etc. The summation of all the aperture areas a1i for all n apertures results in the total aperture area A1.
A1=Σi=1na1i for i=1 to n
The apertures 430 have a cutting edge (not shown in
L1=Σi=1nl1i for i=1 to n
The skin treatment sheet comprises a number n of apertures 430, 430′, 430″, etc. For each aperture a closest adjacent aperture can be found. A straight line X′−″ starting on any point p′ located on the inner perimeter 431′ of a first aperture 430′ and ending on any point p″ located on the inner perimeter 431″ of a second aperture 430″ can be drawn. The shortest aperture separation b1, between aperture i and the closest adjacent aperture is defined as the length of the shortest line X′−″ that can be drawn in such a way between these two closest adjacent apertures. The minimum of all shortest aperture separations b1i is defined as b1min:
b1min=min(b1min) for i=1 to n
The rim width W1 is the shortest distance that can be measured from the outer perimeter R to the inner perimeter r1 of any of the apertures adjacent to the outer perimeter R.
The cutting length l1i (i=1 to n) of an aperture 430 on the first surface 41 of the treatment sheet 40 is defined as the length of the portion along the inner perimeter 431 that has cutting edge 4 along the inner perimeter r1i where a cutting edge is provided within the aperture 430. The summation of all of the cutting lengths l1i for all n apertures results in the total cutting length L1.
L1=Σi=1nl1i for i=1 to n
The skin treatment sheet comprises a number n complex shaped and randomly oriented apertures. For each aperture a closest adjacent aperture can be found. A straight line X′−″ starting on any point p′ located on the inner perimeter 431′ of a first aperture 430′ and ending on any point p″ located on the inner perimeter 431″ of a second aperture 430″ can be drawn. The shortest aperture separation b1i between aperture i and the closest adjacent aperture is defined as the length of the shortest line X′−″ that can be drawn in such a way between these two closest adjacent apertures. The minimum of all shortest aperture separations b1i is defined as b1min:
b1min=min(b1i) for i=1 to n
The shortest distance between two closest adjacent apertures 430 and 430′ on the first surface 41 is b1i. The corresponding shortest distance between two closest adjacent apertures 430 and 430′ on the second surface 42 is b2i. The minimum aperture distance b1min that characterizes a treatment sheet 40 is the minimum of all shortest aperture separations b1min that can be drawn between all pairs of adjacent apertures on a treatment sheet.
A vertical cross section taken through the treatment sheet 40 taken normal to the plane of the first surface 41 along the line of b1min (shown for instance in
In
In
The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”
Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application and any patent application or patent to which this application claims priority or benefit thereof, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests, or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21169509.3 | Apr 2021 | EP | regional |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/EP22/60379 | Apr 2022 | US |
| Child | 18380723 | US |
