The present invention relates to overhead cranes for use in industrial plants, and more particularly to an overhead crane that is configured to lift a load using motorized means, but wherein an operator manually pulls or pushes the lifted load to its destination.
Overhead cranes typically include a pair of runways, which may be mounted fixedly to the roof joists of an industrial plant, a bridge that includes one or more bridge rails which have rollers at their ends for rolling along the runway rails, and a trolley which has rollers thereon for rolling along the one or more bridge rails. A hoist or some other lifting device is provided on the trolley for lifting a load.
For cranes having capacities of more than 4000 lb, I-Beam crane rails are typically used for the one or more bridge rails and for the runways. For cranes having capacities of less 4000 lb, enclosed track crane rails, such as the crane rail shown at 100 in
A particular category of cranes are referred to as ‘light’ cranes, and typically have a capacity of about 2000 lb or less. Light cranes typically do not have tractor drives on the bridge and trolley, which means that the load, once lifted off the plant floor, is moved around manually by the crane operator.
For such cranes, the weight of the bridge rails directly impacts the effort that the operator is required to exert when moving the lifted load to its destination. It is thus generally desirable to reduce the weight of the bridge rails. By reducing their weight, the effort required to move a given size of lifted load can be reduced.
A typical enclosed bridge rail is shown in
It would be desirable to find other ways of reducing the weight of the bridge rail particularly for light cranes that lack tractor drives for moving the bridge on the runways.
In a first aspect, the invention is directed to an overhead crane with one or more bridge rails, that incorporates a reinforcement truss into its one or more bridge rails so as to reduce the overall mass of the one or more bridge rails. This facilitates movement of a load carried by the bridge by an operator to a destination point, particularly in embodiments wherein the one or more bridge rails do not have any bridge drive motors thereon. Reducing the mass of the bridge can increase the amount of lifted load that can comfortably be maneuvered by an operator, particularly when the bridge is manually moved along the runway. Additionally, reducing the mass of the bridge reduces the momentum associated with the bridge, which can increase the amount of control that the operator has when it is desired to stop the bridge when the load has been maneuvered to its desired destination point. The second reinforcement members may have first and second ends that are inserted into receiving apertures in the first reinforcement member and in a bracket that mounts to the bridge rail respectively. In embodiments wherein the bridge includes two rails and is capable of supporting a load in such a way as to generate a downward force that is offset from the bridge axis, the second reinforcement members may be connected to the first reinforcement member and to brackets in such a way as to prevent the withdrawal of the second reinforcement members from the receiving apertures.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a retrofit kit that permits the reinforcing structure described above to be easily retrofitted to existing bridge rails without the need for welding and without the need to install an inordinate quantity of fasteners.
The present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
a is a magnified sectional view of a bracket shown receiving the second reinforcement member in
a is a magnified perspective view further showing the mounting of the second reinforcement member shown in
Reference is made to
The bridge 14 shown in
The bridge rail 24 in
The bridge rail 24 may be made from any suitable material, such as aluminum. It will be understood that, throughout this disclosure, the term aluminum is intended to encompass both pure aluminum and aluminum alloys. By manufacturing the bridge rail 24 out of aluminum the bridge rail 24 is lighter than if it were manufactured from a material such as steel.
Referring to
The first bridge reinforcement member 36 may be mounted to the bridge rail 24 in any suitable way, such as by a mechanical connection. For example, as shown in
Each second bridge reinforcement member 38 has a first end 48 that may be mechanically connected to the top end (shown at 50) of the first bridge reinforcement member 36. For example, as shown in
Each second bridge reinforcement member 38 has a second end 52 (
The receiving aperture 53 may be a blind aperture with an end wall to support the second end 52 of the second bridge reinforcement member 38. The receiving aperture 53 may be referred to as a bracket receiving aperture 53.
During use with a chain type hoist on the trolley 16, the first member 36 is in tension and the second members 38 are in compression.
It will be noted that, because the second members 38 are in compression when in use, they do not require further fastening to the brackets 54 and to the first member 36. Accordingly, they can be relatively simple to mount to the first member 36 and to the bridge rail 24.
Referring to
The reinforcement members 36 and 38 together form a truss that is relatively simple and inexpensive to manufacture and that is relatively simple and quick to mount to the bridge rail 24 and is particularly advantageous in embodiments wherein the bridge rail 24 is made from aluminum. While mechanical joints are preferred for connecting the reinforcement members 36 and 38 to each other and to the bridge rail 24, particularly when all of these components are made from aluminum, it is nonetheless contemplated that these components could alternatively be welded together.
In general, welding to an aluminum bridge rail can be difficult to achieve without weakening the parent material that makes up the bridge rail. Use of mechanical fasteners instead to join reinforcement members to a bridge rail can be relatively time consuming however. Some proposed prior art reinforcement structures do not lend themselves to be joined to an aluminum bridge rail, since they entail joining to the bridge rail at many points, which would involve either many welds, which would weaken the bridge rail, or many mechanical fasteners, which would make the bridge rail prohibitively time consuming to manufacture.
The reinforcement structure 35 provides the greatest increase in bending strength to the bridge rail 24 at the longitudinal center of the bridge rail 24, shown at 64, which is also where the lifting device 18 exerts the greatest bending moments on the bridge rail 24. The amount of bending strength the reinforcement structure 35 provided to the bridge rail 24 decreases from the longitudinal center 64 toward the outer ends (which are shown at 65a and 65b). It will be noted that the increased resistance to bending provided by the reinforcement members 36 and 38 generally matches the bending moment profile of bending moments exerted by the lifting device 18 on the bridge rail 24 at different points along the bridge rail 24 while holding a load. As a result, the reinforcement members 36 and 38 are efficient in the sense that they provide the most strengthening to the portion of the bridge rail 24 that incurs the highest bending moments (ie. the middle of the bridge rail 24).
By providing the reinforcement members 36 and 38, the bridge rail 24 can be made lighter than would otherwise be required if it consisted only of the bridge rail 24, for holding a selected size of load. This reduces the overall amount of weight that an operator must push or pull in embodiments wherein bridge drive motors are not provided. This is also advantageous in embodiments that do include drive motors for the bridge since the bridge drive motor (or motors) have less work to do to move the lighter bridge along the runway rails.
Another advantage to this configuration is that the bridge 14 has less momentum associated with it, and so the operator has a greater degree of control over stopping the bridge 14 after rolling the bridge 14 to a selected point along the runway rails 20. This is particularly relevant for bridges 14 that have relatively long spans, which are necessarily heavier and which have larger bending moments associated therewith resulting from the greater distances between their points of support on the runway rails and the load.
Referring to
The trolley 16 may be made substantially from aluminum. Other materials may also be used in addition to or instead of aluminum.
The lifting device 18 may be a hoist or may be some other suitable type of lifting device.
Other configurations of the reinforcement structure 35 are possible, which provide increased bending strength to the bridge rail 24, while keeping the number of mounting points between the reinforcement structure 35 and the bridge rail 24 relatively low, and while generally matching the bending moment profile exerted on the bridge rail 24 by the load being held by the lifting device 18 at different positions along the length of the bridge rail 24. In one exemplary alternative configuration, two first reinforcement members 36 may be provided, each of which is connected to a second member 38. The two members 36 may optionally share a common support flange, or may optionally have separate support flanges. The two first members 36 can be positioned proximate each other at the longitudinal center 64 of the bridge rail 24 such that the increase in bending resistance to the bridge rail 24 has roughly the same shape as it did with one centrally positioned first member 36. Alternatively, the two first members 36 can be spaced from each other, and optionally a third reinforcement member can extend between them (eg. generally horizontally between their upper ends). In another alternative, a single centrally positioned first member 36 may be provided, and smaller third members may be provided partway along the length of each second member 38 extending vertically between the second member and the bridge rail 24 to increase the buckling resistance of the second member 38.
Referring to
Reference is made to
It will be noted that, for the bridge rail 202a, the first reinforcement member 210 is under compression and the two second reinforcement members 212 are under tension. Conversely, the first reinforcement member 210 on the second bridge rail 202b is under tension and the second reinforcement members 212 on the second bridge rail 202b are under compression, in similar manner to the single rail bridge 14 shown in
In order to prevent the second reinforcement members 212 from withdrawing from the first reinforcement member 210, the second reinforcement members 212 have lateral extending first end retaining pins 215 that pass through their first ends, shown at 216. The pins 215 engage an inboard face of a wall 218 on the first reinforcement member 210 to prevent the withdrawal of the second reinforcement member 212 therefrom. The pins 215 may be in the form of threaded fasteners (e.g. a bolt and nut).
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As can be seen in
Referring to
Referring to
It will be noted that the reinforcement structures 35 and 208 can easily be retrofitted to existing bridge rails 24, 202 in an existing overhead crane 10, 200, particularly where the overhead crane has upper flanges that can be used as reinforcement support flanges. As a result, the bridge rails can be strengthened significantly so as to be capable of supporting increased loads. It will further be noted that the reinforcement can be provided by the structure 35, 208 without the need for welding elements to the rails 24, 202, without drilling through the rails 24, 202 and without requiring an inordinate number of fasteners.
It is optionally possible to provide the retaining pins 215 and 242 on a single rail bridge, such as the bridge 14, for use in situations where the single rail bridge 14 will be subjected to upward forces from the lifting member.
While the above description constitutes a plurality of embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated that the present invention is susceptible to further modification and change without departing from the fair meaning of the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61297476 | Jan 2010 | US |