This application relates to doors, in particular, rolling or coiling slatted doors, such as safety doors.
Slatted doors such as doors constructed out of a plurality of parallel connected slats, are known and commonly used in selective covering of openings in buildings or between adjacent rooms in buildings, such as garages, entrances, etc. One problem with slatted doors is that they are vulnerable to damage and/or disengagement with the door frame, and/or individual slat when receiving an impact force or exposure to high pressures, such as blowing debris from extreme weather.
There is therefore a need for a slatted door that can withstand high pressure conditions without the use of slats of increased weight.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a door assembly for covering an opening defined by at least one structural element of a building, the door assembly has: a shutter roller positioned proximate the opening and rotatable about an axis of rotation; a drive mechanism configured to rotate the shutter roller about the axis of rotation; a flexible door having an outward face and windable on and off the shutter roller such that the flexible door is movable between retracted and extended positions by operation of the drive mechanism, the flexible door having a plurality of interconnected slats, each slat being integrally formed in one piece, each having two ends, an upper edge and a lower edge, and each being arranged along a direction perpendicular to a direction of travel of the door; a guide rail assembly positioned at each side of the opening and extending along the direction of travel of the door; and a plurality of end members each attachable to an end of a corresponding slat. The upper edge of each slat has an upper hook portion and an upper curved channel, the upper hook portion being configured to rotatably engage with a lower curved channel of the lower edge of an upper adjacent slat, and the lower edge having a lower hook portion and a lower curved channel configured to rotatably engage with the upper curved channel of the upper edge of a lower adjacent slat. At least when the upper adjacent slat is connected to the lower adjacent slat via the upper and lower hook portions and respective counterpart lower and upper curved channels, the upper and lower adjacent slats engage one another along their respective upper and lower edges to form a reinforcement impact distribution structure extending laterally along the length of the slats. The impact distribution structure is configured to: (a) rotatably secure the upper adjacent and lower adjacent slats to one another, and (b) direct an impact force applied to the door in a direction substantially along the length of said one or more slats.
In the drawings:
As shown in
As shown in
In contrast to known slats that are formed from one or more sheet metal layers, the slats 22 in accordance with the present invention are each integrally formed, for example by extrusion of a plastic, a metal or composite-extrudable material, or cast, for example from a molten material, such as aluminum, or stamped, such as a metal suitable for stamping.
With reference to
In a preferred extruded embodiment, each slat has a central cavity 29, seen in the cross-sectional view as a having generally trapezoidal section profile, but preferably having curved sides. The central cavity extends lengthwise along at least a portion of the longitudinal extent, i.e., the length of the slat.
Each slat 22 comprises a front face 24, a rear face 25, the cavity 29, with the ends 26 and 28 forming the bottom and the top of the slat 22, respectively. A lower hook 30 and an upper hook 32 are formed at the bottom and top ends 26, 28, respectively.
As can be best seen in
Additionally, the top end 28 is configured so as to form an upper slot or channel 31 configured to engage the lower hook 30 of the above adjacent slat. The bottom end 26 is configured so as to form a lower slot or channel 33 configured to engage an upper hook 32 of the below adjacent slat.
As can be seen from
This engagement of the bead 35 of the upper adjacent slat 22 with the upper hook 32 of the lower adjacent slat 22, taken together with the engagement of the outwardly curved portion 36 of the upper hook 32 with an inwardly curved portion 37 of the lower hook 30, provides for reinforcement for the door 10 at the interface between adjacent slats that strengthen against the possibility of an impacting force directed to the front of the door from dislodging the slats from one another.
This reinforcement is further enhanced by the fact that the front of the slat 22 at the top end 28, has a tapered tip 38 and the front of the slat 22 at the bottom end 26 has a seat 39. The seat 39 is configured so that, when adjacent slats 22 are configured in a flat configuration, i.e., the portion of the door including those slats is flat, the tapered tip 38 of a lower adjacent slat is supported in the seat 39 of the upper adjacent slat.
By virtue of the above-described structure, in a rolled down deployed condition of the door 10, when the front faces 24 of the slats are substantially flat with respect to one another, the deployed door 10, at the adjoining portions of any of the adjacent slats in a flat portion of the door, that is in a deployed portion, effectively has a multi-layer reinforcement the components of which are, i.e., the bead 35, the upper hook 32 and the lower hook 30 and the seated tapered tip 38, which line up outwardly to provide reinforcement from a force impacting the door from the front.
The engaged hooks 32, 30, the bead 35 and the tapered tip 38 of the slats 22 thus form a lateral reinforcement impact distribution structure, distributing impact forces in a direction along the slat length. By virtue of such impact distribution structure, the door slats 22 are less likely to separate from each other, and are less likely to be dislodged from the guide tracks 14, when the door is impacted at the front by debris or the like. Thus, such configurations result in an improved robust door.
Just as in the case of the slats 22 in accordance with the first aspect of the present invention, the slats 22′ are each integrally formed, for example by extrusion of a plastic, a metal or composite extrudable material, or cast, for example from a molten material, such as aluminum, or stamped, such as a metal suitable for stamping.
Each slat 22′ has, in a sectional view, what will be referred to as bottom end 26′ and a top end 28′. Except where a particular slat is located at the very bottom of the door or the very top of the door, the bottom end 26′ of a respective slat 22′ connects to top end 28′ of a lower adjacent slat 22′.
Each slat 22′ comprises a front face 24′, with the ends 26′ and 28′ forming the bottom and the top of the slat 22′, respectively. A lower hook 30′ and an upper hook 32′ are formed at the bottom and top ends 26′, 28′, respectively.
As can be seen in
Additionally, the top end 28′ is configured so as to form an upper slot or channel 31′ configured to engage the lower hook 30′ of the above adjacent slat. The bottom end 26′ is configured so as to form a lower slot or channel 33′ configured to engage an upper hook 32′ of the below adjacent slat.
As can be seen from
This engagement of the bead 35′ of the upper adjacent slat 22′ with the upper hook 32′ of the lower adjacent slat 22′, taken together with the engagement of the outwardly curved portion 36′ of the upper hook 32′ with an inwardly curved portion 37′ of the lower hook 30′, provides for reinforcement for the door 10 at the interface between adjacent slats that strengthen against the possibility of an impacting force directed to the front of the door from dislodging the slats from one another.
This reinforcement is further enhanced by the fact that the front of the slat 22′ at the top end 28′, has a tapered tip 38′ and the front of the slat 22′ at the bottom end 26′ has a seat 39′. The seat 39′ is configured so that, when adjacent slats 22′ are configured in a flat configuration, i.e., the portion of the door including those slats is flat, the tapered tip 38′ of a lower adjacent slat is supported in the seat 39′ of the upper adjacent slat.
By virtue of the above-described structure, in a rolled down deployed condition of the door 10, when the front faces 24′ of the slats 22′ according to this second aspect are flat with respect to one another, the deployed door 10, at the adjoining portions of any of the adjacent slats in a flat portion of the door, that is in a deployed portion, effectively has a multi-layer reinforcement the components of which, i.e., the bead 35′, the upper hook 32′ and the lower hook 30′ and the seated tapered tip 38′, line up outwardly to provide reinforcement from a force impacting the door from the front.
The engaged hooks 32′, 30′, the bead 35′ and the tapered tip 38′ of the slats 22′ thus form a lateral reinforcement impact distribution structure, distributing impact forces in a direction along the slat length. By virtue of such impact distribution structure, the door slats 22′ according to the second aspect are less likely to separate from each other, and are less likely to be dislodged from the guide tracks 14, when the door is impacted by debris or the like. Thus, such configurations result in an improved robust door.
It is noted that except for the lack of a back face and cavity, the slats 22′ according to the second would wind up on the roller barrel 12 in the manner shown and discussed above in relation to
More importantly, each end member has an extending portion 63 or force dampener which extends in a direction away from the front side 24 of the slats 22. Each extending portion 63 is configured to overlap an adjacent extending portion 63 of an adjacent slat. The overlap portions can be coupled to each other or simply arranged in an overlap configuration with sufficient spacing such that a force applied to the front 24 of a slat (i.e., a “subject slat”) will travel to the associated end member, to the extending portion and then, as a result of the direct coupling or close proximity arrangement, to the extending portions 63 of slats adjacent the subject slat. This arrangement provides a force dampening effect.
The end members can be in the form of a windlock 60 or an endlock 61. As will be described below, the difference between a windlock 60 and an endlock 61 is an additional structure, referred to as a windlock wing member 62, which engages the railing of the guide track 14 to prevent excessive bowing of the door 10 which could cause disengaging of the door from the railing.
It is noted that even though the windlocks and endlocks are referred to generally as forming a chain assembly 57, the windlocks and endlocks need not be connected to each other to actually form a “chain.”
Although the use of the slats 22 will provide the advantages mentioned above, the overlapping of the vertically extending portion 63 of the various adjacent windlocks and endlocks also provides an impact distribution benefit by dispersing impact forces applied to the door slats 22.
This is so even if the ends of the vertically extending portions are not connected, e.g., bolted, to one another, but are simply in close proximity to each other. This is because the overlap of the ends of the vertically extending portions 63 absorbs and dissipates to adjacent extending portions any impact force that travels in the lengthwise direction of the slat. Thus, although embodiments are shown herein in which the ends of the vertically extending portions 63 are shown as being connected with, e.g., bolts, the overlap of the vertically extending portions 63 alone, i.e., without being bolted together, will also provide distribution of an impact force to adjacent slats.
As shown in
As discussed above, the engaged hooks 32, 30, the bead 35 and the tapered tip 38 of the slats 22 form a lateral reinforcement impact distribution structure According to another aspect of the present invention, another structure for providing lateral reinforcement impact force distribution may be realized by utilizing one or more stiffening inserts 802 in the cavity 29, as seen in
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, the slats 22 can be extruded, stamped or cast, depending on the material used. Suitable material may include plastic, aluminum, steel, stainless steel, or any other material readily known to one of ordinary skill in the art that could be used to form the integrally formed slats as in the present invention. The thickness of the slats will vary depending on the material used and the environment in which the door is utilized. In an exemplary embodiment, the slats can be dimensioned as width of ⅞″ to 1-½″, height of 2″ to 4″, and thickness of 1/16″ to ⅜″.
More importantly, in one embodiment alternating ones of the end members have a vertically extending portion 63′ (force dampener) which is configured to overlap with a portion of the edge of an adjacent slat. The overlap portions are arranged in a configuration with sufficient spacing such that a force applied to the front 24 of a slat (i.e., a “subject slat”) will travel to the associated end member to, in alternating slats, the extending portion and then, as a result of the close proximity arrangement, to the extending portions 63′ of slats one away from the adjacent slat. This arrangement provides a force dampening effect.
The end members can be in the form of an overlapping windlock 60′ or a non-overlapping windlock 61′. Each of the end members, regardless of whether overlapping or non-overlapping, has an additional structure, referred to as a windlock wing member 62′, which engages the railing of the guide track 14 to prevent excessive bowing of the door 10 which could cause disengaging of the door from the railing. In contrast to the embodiment of
Each overlapping windlock 60′ has a vertically extending portion 63′. This portion is not provided on the non-overlapping windlock 61′. Thus, the only difference between windlock 61′ and windlock 60′ is the existence of portion 63′.
As seen in
Specifically, as can be seed in
While the figures show an alternating configuration of windlocks 60′ and windlocks 61′, such alternating arrangement is not required. In fact, for the purposes of lateral force distribution in the case of frontal impact, the door will work equally well with different numbers and percentages of the two types of windlocks. The chain assembly 57′ can have an arrangement of these, or all of one type lock, or all of the other type lock.
It is noted that even though the windlocks are referred to generally as forming a chain assembly 57′, the windlocks need not be connected to each other to actually form a “chain.”
Thus, while there have been shown and described and pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the devices illustrated, and in their operation, may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, it is expressly intended that all combinations of those elements and/or method steps which perform substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve the same results are within the scope of the invention. Moreover, it should be recognized that structures and/or elements and/or method steps shown and/or described in connection with any disclosed form or embodiment of the invention may be incorporated in any other disclosed or described or suggested form or embodiment as a general matter of design choice.
This application claims benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 63/210,778, filed Jun. 15, 2021, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63210778 | Jun 2021 | US |