The inventions described and claimed herein relate generally to bezels for control knobs. More specifically, the inventions described and claimed herein relate to control knob bezels for gas-fired barbecue grills which are simultaneously adjustable along two axes to allow for centering alignment of the bezel with the control knob and/or the gas control valve.
Most gas cooking appliances, including gas-fired barbecue grills, utilize valve and knob combinations for controlling the temperature and flame intensity. These valve and knob combinations commonly utilize so-called “push to turn” shafts which are aligned with associated apertures in the appliance walls. In other words, common control knobs are movable inwardly and outwardly over a limited range of axial movement, are biased towards the outwardly position, and are rotatable about the axis only when moved inwardly. As such, most gas cooking appliances require a gap or space between the control knob and the appliance wall to facilitate the “push to turn” function. It is recognized that these gaps or spaces may not be desirable, since the gaps not only detract from the overall appearance of the grill but also provide a location for food and grease to accumulate. Additionally, food or grease can easily reach the aperture in the appliance wall and accumulate inside of the appliance.
As a result, some manufacturers incorporate bezel assemblies into their appliances, especially on higher-end models. Bezels typically include two or more pre-drilled holes which are adapted to align with pre-drilled holes in the appliance wall. The bezel is attached to the appliance wall by means of fasteners which pass through the respective pre-drilled holes. The bezel also typically includes an aperture which is aligned with an aperture in the appliance wall. In this manner, the bezel is aligned co-axially with the valve shaft. Bezels also usually include an annular raised portion with an inner diameter which closely corresponds with the outer diameter of the control knob. The annular raised portion of the bezel serves to “frame” the control knob, thereby substantially covering the inherent gap between the knob and the appliance wall and reducing the amount of debris which will accumulate under the control knob. Moreover, the annular portion serves an aesthetic purpose by streamlining the control panel of the appliance.
While prior art bezels of the type described above solve some of the heretofore-mentioned problems which are inherent to gas appliances, many complex and challenging problems still remain. For example, manufacturers of such gas appliances still struggle with alignment problems. More specifically, depending upon the design of the grill, it may be troublesome to align the bezel to be perfectly centered with the axis of the valve shaft. Failure to align the bezel with the shaft (and, in turn, with the control knob) can have some detrimental implications. For example, there is usually only a small space between the annular raised portion of the bezel and the control knob. As such, it is usually visually apparent when the bezel is not perfectly centered with the control knob. Moreover, if the bezel is not perfectly aligned with the valve shaft, it can be difficult or near impossible to bring the control knob into engagement with the valve shaft without bending or otherwise damaging the stem of the control knob of the shaft of the valve.
Some manufacturers have attempted to solve this problem by replacing the pre-drilled mounting holes in the bezel with pre-drilled slots which allow the plate to be shifted relative to the pre-drilled mounting hole in the appliance wall. See, for example, the prior art bezel assembly shown in
The prior art solution described above is inadequate or at least impractical for other grill designs in which the gas control valve is mounted to some other component of the grill, besides the control panel. In such cases, the position of the valve shaft relative to the aperture in the appliance wall cannot be easily controlled due to tolerance accumulation. To ensure perfect alignment in such cases would require significant additional design work and expense. Therefore, there is a need in the art for a bezel assembly which can be adjusted simultaneously along two axes.
The various embodiments of the present inventions provide a satisfactory means for overcoming the problems of the prior art bezel assemblies. More specifically, the present inventions include a bezel assembly which allows for adjusting the bezel along a two-dimensional plane with respect to the appliance wall (or control panel).
The preferred bezel assembly generally comprises a bezel plate, a panel, and two anchors. The preferred bezel plate includes a central aperture which is bounded on two sides by a pair of slots, which are aligned generally parallel. The preferred panel also includes a central aperture, which is generally aligned with the central aperture in the bezel plate, wherein the central aperture of the panel is also bounded on two sides by a pair of parallel slots. The pair of slots in the panel are preferably aligned perpendicular or transverse to the pair of slots in the bezel. The anchors are adapted to be disposed between the bezel and the panel, whereby each anchor has a first bearing feature for sliding engagement with one of the slots in the bezel plate and a second bearing feature for sliding engagement with one of the slots in the panel. The bearing features preferably fit snugly within the side walls of the slots, although the bearing features preferably have a length which is substantially less that the length of the slots, whereby the bearing features can slide within the slots along its length. As such, when the bezel plate assembly is assembled, the bezel plate can be simultaneously adjusted along at least two axes with respect to the panel.
These and other features, aspects, objects, and advantages of the inventions described and claimed herein will become better understood upon consideration of the following detailed description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
It should be understood that the drawings are not necessarily to scale and that the embodiments are sometimes illustrated by graphic symbols, phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the inventions described and claimed herein or which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted. It should be understood, of course, that the inventions described herein are not necessarily limited to the particular embodiments illustrated herein.
Like reference numerals will be used to refer to like or similar parts from figure to figure in the following description of the drawings.
Referring first to
Barbecue grill control panels (otherwise referred to herein as, and considered equivalent to, the appliance wall) 18 typically include various controls for the barbecue grill. For example, the control panel 18 for the exemplary barbecue grill 10 of
Turning now to
Turning now to
The preferred bezel 42 generally comprises a generally flat central portion 47 and a raised generally annular portion 52. The central portion 47 includes a central aperture 48, like the panel 18, although the central aperture 48 of the bezel 42 need not be as large as the central aperture 22 of the panel 18. Moreover, the central aperture 48 can have any complimentary shape, including circular, rectangular, square, triangular, etc. However, the central aperture 48 should generally align with the central aperture 22 when the bezel 42 is mounted to the panel 18. That is, a portion of the central aperture 48 should overlap with the central aperture 22 when the bezel assembly 40 is assembled. The central portion 47 also includes at least one, and preferably two parallel, slots 50 which are situated at opposite sides (or diametrically opposite, as the case may be) of the central aperture 48. The slots 50 preferably have openings which overlap with the slots 24 in the panel 18 when the bezel 42 is mounted to the panel 18. However, the slots 50 are not aligned in parallel with the slots 24 in the panel. Instead, the length of the slots 50 are preferably generally aligned along axis A. The two slots 50, like the slots 24 in the panel 18, define channel ways for the anchors 44, allowing the anchors 44 to slide along the length of the slot 50, wherein the length of the slots 50 are parallel with axis A.
Turning now to
The preferred bearing features 62, 64 of the anchor 44 also include first and second guide features 66, 68 which are configured to engage with the slots 50, 24 in the bezel 42 and the panel 18, respectively. The preferred guide features 66, 68 are generally characterized as projections which extend from the surfaces 58, 60 and preferably fit snugly against the side walls of the slots 50, 24 allowing linear sliding movements of the anchor 44 along the length of the slots 50, 24.
The anchor 44 also preferably includes means for retaining the anchor 44 in engagement within the slots 50, 24 of the panel 18 and the bezel 42. For instance, the anchor 44 depicted in
Referring now to
Note that while for the preferred embodiment of the anchor 44, the split-leg locking feature 72 is part of the second bearing feature 64 and the first bearing feature 62 is situated on the side of the anchor 44 adapted to receive the fastener 46, such configuration can be reversed. In such case, for example, the fastener 46 is received from the inside surface of the panel 18 there locking the panel 18 to the anchor 44, and the expandable split-leg members engage with the slot 50 in the bezel 42.
The first bearing surface 62 allows the anchor 44 to slide within the slot 50 in the bezel 42 along the first axis while the second bearing surface 64 allows the anchor 44 to simultaneously slide within the slot 24 in the panel 18 along the second axis. Since the anchor is positioned between the bezel 42 and the panel 18 and serves to interconnect the two, the bezel 42 can be effectively moved simultaneously along two axes relative to the panel. This feature is best demonstrated by
Although the anchor 44 has been described in terms of its preferred embodiment, it is contemplated that the anchor 44 can take many different forms. For example, the anchor could simply comprise a fastener, wherein the width of the slots 24, 50 are sized to conform to the diameter of the threaded portion of the fastener. Many different types of fasteners would work, such as a bolt and nut combination, or a rivet or a self-tapping screw. Alternatively, the anchor 44a could take form as shown in
Although the inventions described and claimed herein have been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the inventions described and claimed herein can be practiced by other than the preferred embodiments, which have been presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred embodiments contained herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1209037 | Rosenfeld | Dec 1916 | A |
1297528 | Wright | Mar 1919 | A |
1784755 | Rosenberg | Dec 1930 | A |
2572428 | Anstine | Oct 1951 | A |
3107113 | Sconzo | Oct 1963 | A |
3427061 | Gresham et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
4070945 | Kurosaki | Jan 1978 | A |
4087123 | Redshaw | May 1978 | A |
4114589 | Berlik et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4263833 | Loudin et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4445455 | Cannon | May 1984 | A |
4499630 | Harris et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4726722 | Wollar | Feb 1988 | A |
5384442 | Danner | Jan 1995 | A |
5509174 | Worrell | Apr 1996 | A |
5540528 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
D498657 | Milrud et al. | Nov 2004 | S |
Entry |
---|
Char-Broil, Designer Series, Product Guide, Model No. 463261106. |
Char-Broil, TEC, Product Guide, Model No. 463268307. |
Fastex, Product Spec Sheets, (www.itw-fastex.com/catalog/017.php). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080202351 A1 | Aug 2008 | US |