Patent Grant
7647729
This invention relates generally to sliding door systems and, more particularly, to sliding doors, windows, mirrors, etc. that include upper roller and lower wheel assemblies that provide not only a smooth and quiet glide, but also a safety mechanism to ensure that the sliding door, window, mirror, etc. remains on its track.
Every sliding door usually has an upper track and a lower track. The majority of the weight of each door is carried by the lower track. As such, the upper track is generally designed in such a way as to guide the door so as to keep it in line and in place. As a result, the upper part of the door is usually looser, and typically creates undesirable noises caused by the friction between the upper part of the door and portions of the upper track.
In addition, it is important to ensure that sliding doors always remain in their tracks. Disengagement of a sliding door (or window, mirror, etc.) from its tracks is problematic for at least two reasons. First, the door, or portions thereof, might fall and break, thereby requiring costly repair or replacement. Second, and more importantly, a disengaged sliding door presents a significant health hazard not only to the individual operating the door, but also to any bystanders in the vicinity of the door.
Moreover, existing sliding doors provide little or no flexibility based on their functionality. More specifically, it may be desirable to customize a sliding door based on the door's intended function. Thus, for example, if the door is intended to function as a room divider, it may be desirable to have a “one-piece” panel design. On the other hand, if the sliding door is meant to be a sliding mirror or glass door for a closet, it may be desirable for the panel to be multi-faceted, e.g., have multiple horizontal or vertical panel designs.
With existing systems, the only way to achieve such function-based designs is to manufacture the door with multiple panels cut to produce the desired shapes and angles. Thus, in order for a glass door to appear as if it has three horizontal sections, for example, the door would have to be manufactured with three pieces of glass fitted within a frame that includes four horizontal frame members. This practice, however, requires that each and every sliding door be custom-made, thereby making it labor- and cost-intensive. In addition, once a door has been custom-made, the only way for a different design to be achieved—e.g., four horizontal sections instead of three—would be for another door to be custom made with the new specifications, thereby rendering the old door useless.
What is needed, therefore, is a sliding door system that allows the door to slide back and forth smoothly without any obstacles, interruptions, or undesirable noises, prevents disengagement of the door from its tracks, and allows for repeated customization without the requirement of manufacturing a new, custom-made door each time.
In light of the above-mentioned need, the instant invention is directed to a sliding door system that provides a smooth and quiet glide, a safety mechanism to ensure that the sliding door remains on its track, and a means for effecting design flexibility in a time- and cost-efficient manner.
It is noted that, although, throughout the ensuing discussion, reference is made to a sliding “door”, such reference is made by way of illustration, and not limitation. Thus, the instant invention encompasses sliding structures that may be used as doors (e.g., closet doors); room dividers; (wall) pocket doors, where the sliding “door” extends from, and retracts into, a wall cavity; wall sliders, where lower and upper tracks are placed next to a wall, such that the sliding “door” slides back and forth from behind the wall; etc. In addition, the term “door” is used herein generically and without limitation as to the material of which the door's panel is made. Thus, the panel may be made of clear glass, milky glass, frosted glass, mirror, etc., and combinations thereof.
As shown in
The upper roller assembly 40 includes first and second rollers 44, 45 that are rotatably mounted on respective first and second vertical shafts 42, 43. With reference to
The above configuration is significant because it allows the door 10 to be stable and slide smoothly without any frictional contact between the upper track 200 and the door 10. Specifically, the upper track 200 defines at least one channel 210 having first and second opposing side walls 212, 214. As shown in
It is noted that, in a preferred embodiment, the combined span of the rollers 44, 45 is slightly larger than the horizontal distance between the respective inner surfaces of the side walls 212, 214, and rollers 44, 45 are made of flexible rubber, so as to provide for a snug fit between the rollers 44, 45 and the side walls 212, 214. In addition, in embodiments of the invention, one or both of the side walls 212, 214 may extend far enough downwards to completely cover (the front side A, and/or the back side B, respectively, of) the horizontal top portion 16 of the frame 14.
As shown in
The spine 62 connects to a mounting bracket 68 by attachment means, such as, for example, screws or bolts 77, through the vertical slot 64. The mounting bracket 68, in turn, couples to the back side of the vertical side portion 20 using screws or similar attachment means 79. As shown in
In operation, the height of the vertical spine 62 (and, therefore, the height of the door 10) can be adjusted by moving the spine 62 up or down, and then fastening to the mounting bracket 68 at the desired location. Once the height has been set, the safety screw 75 is then adjusted such that its bottom rests on the top surface 67 of the spine 62, thereby preventing any vertical movement of the lower wheel 70 during use.
In preferred embodiments, the lower track 100 includes a convex longitudinal (rail) portion 102 that mates with the lower wheel's concave channel 72. In addition, a concave channel 104 defined by the underside of the convex longitudinal portion 102 provides a surface for engaging the latch member 74. Thus, the latch member 74 slidably engages the channel 104 such that, as the lower wheel 70 rotates on the outer side of the convex longitudinal portion 102, the door 10 remains latched to the lower track 100.
As noted previously, existing sliding doors allow little to no flexibility in panel design. As shown in
It is noted that, because the dividers 400 can be placed anywhere on the panel, the resulting appearance can be asymmetrical, if such asymmetry is desired. Thus, for example, in
While the description above refers to particular embodiments of the present invention, it will be understood that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit thereof. For example, although the figures depict, illustratively, an upper track 200 with two channels 210, 310, the upper track 200 may include as few (e.g., a single one), or as many, channels as may be needed to implement the invention. Similarly, although the lower track 100 is shown, illustratively, to accommodate either one or two doors 10, 300, the lower track 100 may be made so as to accommodate one or more doors, depending on the intended use and the area to be covered by the door(s).
For example, when a single door is to be used, the upper track 200 may include a single channel 210, and the lower track 100 may include a single convex longitudinal portion 102 to support the lower wheel assembly 60. On the other hand, when two doors are to be used, the upper track 200 may include two channels 210, 310, and the lower track 100 may include two longitudinal portions 102, 302.
In addition, the same configuration may be used when more than two doors are necessary. Thus, for example, when four doors are to be used, each of the channels 210, 310, and each of the longitudinal rails 102, 302 may accommodate two doors, and the doors may slide between the upper and lower tracks in alternative positions. That is, the first and third doors may be accommodated by the first channel and longitudinal portion, and the second and fourth doors may be accommodated by the second channel and longitudinal portion. Alternatively, the first and fourth doors may be accommodated by the first channel and longitudinal portion, and the second and third doors may be accommodated by the second channel and longitudinal portion. Other similar configurations may also be used, as necessary.
The accompanying claims are therefore intended to cover such modifications as would fall within the true scope and spirit of the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of provisional application Ser. No. 60/718,114, filed Sep. 16, 2005, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 302628 | Fleming | Jul 1884 | A |
| 313085 | Lawrence | Mar 1885 | A |
| 343368 | Gansz | Jun 1886 | A |
| 472110 | Eckerson | Apr 1892 | A |
| 814434 | Dahlund | Mar 1906 | A |
| 873816 | Wideman et al. | Dec 1907 | A |
| 1041446 | Dolph | Oct 1912 | A |
| 1360777 | Murphy | Nov 1920 | A |
| 1875965 | Waters | Sep 1932 | A |
| 2650387 | Foss | Sep 1953 | A |
| 2834069 | Perrone | May 1958 | A |
| 3033285 | Banner | May 1962 | A |
| 3058173 | Brydolf | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3058174 | Sterling | Oct 1962 | A |
| 3533190 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3693293 | Egan, Jr. et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3750337 | Brydolf et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
| 4123874 | Scott | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4193500 | Scott | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4288887 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4561210 | Kvas et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4672712 | Stevenson | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4722150 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4819297 | Jacobs et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4850145 | McAfee | Jul 1989 | A |
| 5119872 | Engebretson | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5349783 | Jasperson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5555923 | Leist et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5575321 | Currier | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5598606 | Jacobs | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5598666 | Kurth | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5671502 | Ezman | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5724770 | McAfee | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742979 | Garcia-Hernando | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5791089 | Prevot et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5836111 | Tak | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5927017 | Jacobs et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5964061 | Hughes et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974738 | Jacobs | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6065249 | Gephart et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6142082 | Burke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6148896 | Pinto et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6434789 | Kruse | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6449906 | Jacobs | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6584664 | Hostetler et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6826867 | McDonald et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6840009 | Ronay et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6851743 | George et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6860078 | Geisthardt | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 7021007 | Jacobs | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7059017 | Rosko et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 20050000164 | Jacobs | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20070017157 | Ambrozus | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070062122 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60718114 | Sep 2005 | US |
