The invention relates to a sliding door which is installed between two preferably planar wall elements of a building wall and has at least one door leaf which is mounted on a door leaf support frame that is displaceable in the closing and opening direction, which has approximately the dimensions of a door opening in the associated wall element, and which is thus displaceable transversely to the outer surfaces of the wall elements such that, in the closed state of the sliding door, the outer surface of the door leaf is aligned with the outer surface of the associated wall element.
Such sliding doors are usually provided with two door leaves mounted on the same door leaf support frame, with the outer surface of the second door leaf also being aligned with the outer surface of the wall element assigned thereto in the closed state of the sliding door. Such sliding doors and in particular also the door openings are almost invisible in the closed state, which is advantageous both in terms of aesthetics and in terms of security.
DE 101 63 061 B4 discloses a sliding door which comprises a door leaf support which can be displaced in the horizontal direction between two wall shells and on which two door leaves which can be spread in opposite directions are mounted. When the sliding door is in the closed state, the outer surfaces of the spread door leaves are flush with the outer surfaces of the two wall shells. The door leaf support is horizontally displaceable on a linear guide and displaceable by means of a traction means drive driven by an electric motor. The door leaves are connected in the upper region thereof to the sliding door leaf support via handlebar levers forming a parallelogram guide system in each case, so that a distance, measured at a right angle to the outer surfaces of the wall elements, between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame can be changed such that the outer surface of the door leaf can be positioned, in the open state of the sliding door, between the two wall elements and, in the closed state, in the door opening and in alignment with the outer surface of the wall element assigned to the door leaf.
In this sliding door, the spreading of the door leaves—i.e. the increase in the distance between a door leaf and the door leaf support—takes place in that shortly before the end of a closing movement, door leaf components hit a stop plane that is stationary transversely to the displacement direction of the door leaf support, the reaction forces occurring interacting with the handlebar levers of the door leaves, which are inclined with respect to the stop plane, in such a way that the door leaf components slide sideways on the stop plane and pivot the door leaves outward until the end of the closing movement is reached. Such a generation of the spreading movement of the door leaves has the disadvantage that the spreading mechanism is visible and inevitably associated with impact noises, vibrations, scratching noises and surface damage in the region of the sliding paths of the elements sliding on one another. In addition, no functioning solution for generating correct door leaf movements when opening the sliding door can be identified.
An object of the invention is to create a sliding door which does not have the disadvantages mentioned above.
The object is achieved by a sliding door of the type described above, in which a control element is arranged in or on the door leaf support frame which can be displaced in the displacement direction of the door leaf support frame and which can be blocked at the beginning of an end region of a closing movement of the door leaf support frame by a stationary stop and can be displaced relative to the still-moving door leaf support frame, a transmission mechanism being provided which converts a first relative movement occurring between the control element and the door leaf support frame into a defined pivoting movement of the handlebar levers forming a parallelogram guide system and thus into an increase in the distance between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame.
The advantages of the solution according to the invention can be seen particularly clearly in the fact that in order to generate a pivoting movement of the handlebar levers forming a parallelogram guide system, unlike in the cited prior art, handlebar levers that are simply inclined do not come into contact with a stop plane that is stationary transversely to the displacement direction of the door leaf support frame. A transmission mechanism which is practically invisible from the outside is used, by means of which a first relative movement, caused in the end region of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, between a control element and the door leaf support frame is converted via mechanically optimized transmission elements into the desired pivoting movements of the handlebar levers and thus into a door leaf movement directed transversely to the outer surfaces of the wall elements with minimal noise and vibrations.
The term “end region of the closing movement” is to be understood as the last part of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, which begins approximately 10 to 20 millimeters before the final position of the door leaf support frame in the closed state of the sliding door and ends in this final position.
In one of the possible embodiments of the sliding door, in each case two handlebar levers forming a parallelogram guide system are fixed at one end to one of two vertically arranged and horizontally spaced torsion bars, which torsion bars are rotatably mounted on the door leaf support frame, all handlebar levers being approximately the same length and aligned parallel to one another and having vertical-axis door leaf bearing points at the other ends thereof, which bearing points interact with corresponding bearing points on the door leaf in such a way that the door leaf is guided on a parallelogram guide system in which a pivoting movement of one of the two torsion bars causes the increase or decrease in the above-mentioned distance between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame.
This embodiment has the advantage that the at least one door leaf is not only connected to the door leaf support frame in its upper region via handlebar levers. As a result, stable positions of the door leaf are achieved in all operating states, which is not guaranteed by the guide system of the sliding door according to the cited prior art. It is also advantageous that guide grooves for the door leaf in the bottom region of the sliding door can be avoided.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the transmission mechanism has a control groove arranged in the control element, a drive lever attached to one of the two torsion bars and a slide bolt fixed to the end of the drive lever facing away from the torsion bar, parallel to the torsion bar, which slide bolt engages in the control groove, the control groove being shaped in such a way that due to the first relative movement occurring at the beginning of the end region of the closing movement between the control element with the control groove on the one hand and the torsion bar mounted on the door leaf support frame with the drive lever and the slide bolt on the other hand, the slide bolt is moved in the control groove, resulting in the above-mentioned defined pivoting movement of the torsion bar and thus the handlebar levers forming a parallelogram guide system.
This embodiment has the advantage that the relative movement between the door leaf support frame with the drive lever connected to the door leaf support frame via the torsion bar and provided with the slide bolt, on the one hand, and the control element with the control groove, which is stationary in the end region of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, on the other hand, is converted into a pivoting movement of one of the two torsion bars of a door leaf which is precisely and freely definable due to the shape of the control groove. By means of a parallelogram effect, the defined pivoting movement of this torsion bar is transmitted via its handlebar levers to the door leaf, from this to the handlebar levers of the other torsion bar and from these to the other torsion bar, which also ensures the precise intended movement of the door leaf.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the control groove arranged in the control element is shaped in such a way that, in the end region of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, a movement of the door leaf directed at a right angle to the outer surfaces of the wall elements results from a superimposition of the movements of the torsion bars moving with the door leaf support frame and the door-leaf-side door leaf bearing points of the handlebar levers pivoting around the torsion bars.
This ensures that, in the end region of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, the door leaves can enter the door opening in the associated wall element exactly at a right angle to the closing movement and with little backlash and remain positioned there until a later door opening.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, a retaining device is arranged between the control element, which can be displaced in or on the door leaf support frame, and the stationary stop, which retaining device, at the end of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, holds the control element slidably arranged therein in a fixed position with a limited force, so that in the initial region of an opening movement of the door leaf support frame the control element performs a second relative movement, counter to the first relative movement, between the control element and the door leaf support frame which, by means of the above-mentioned transmission mechanism, resets the increase or decrease in the above-mentioned distance between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame.
Such an embodiment resets the first relative movement between the door leaf support frame and the control element arranged displaceably therein and thus reduces the distance between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame, so that the sliding door can be opened completely, in which case both the door leaf support frame and the at least one door leaf arranged thereon can also be positioned between the wall elements. This embodiment has the advantage that the above-mentioned return does not have to be generated by means of a spring. When using a spring return, the displacement drive would have to maintain the closed state permanently with a closing force, which in practice could only be achieved by means of a motor brake. However, this would make it impossible to open the sliding door in the event of a malfunction or power failure.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the retaining device can comprise a permanent holding magnet which is attached to the control element in such a way that, at the beginning of the end region of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, the holding magnet strikes a stationary stop made of soft magnetic material, as a result of which the control element is displaced relative to the door leaf support frame and the control element is held on the stop with a limited holding force.
In this embodiment, a simple and inexpensive permanent holding magnet causes the above-described reset of the first relative movement between the door leaf support frame and the control element arranged displaceably therein and thus reduces the distance between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame during opening. As soon as the first relative movement in the end region of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame between the control element and thus the increase in the distance between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame at the end of the initial region of the door opening movement have been reversed, the permanent holding magnet is separated from the stationary stop.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the retaining device can comprise a spring-loaded snap device which interacts with at least one retaining surface, inclined with respect to the direction of the opening movement, on the control element such that the control element, when it strikes the stationary stop at the beginning of the end region of the closing movement of the door leaf support frame, is retained on the stationary stop with a limited holding force.
With such a snap device as a retaining device, the retaining force can be adjusted more easily and kept constant over a long period of time.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the electric motor serving to displace the door leaf support frame is arranged on the sliding door leaf support frame. This drive arrangement has the advantage that neither a drive support nor a cable connection box needs to be installed outside the door leaf support frame, so that only a small amount of installation work is required at the installation site of the sliding door.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, this is equipped with a second door leaf which is arranged symmetrically to the at least one door leaf with respect to the door leaf support frame and is attached to the door leaf support frame with the same components as the at least one door leaf and is movable transversely to the outer surfaces of the wall elements. With such a sliding door, passages through building walls can be created in which door openings in both wall elements can be closed with door leaves, the outer surfaces of which, when the sliding door is closed, are aligned with the respectively assigned outer surfaces of the wall elements.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the at least one door leaf is equipped with a latch which, in the closed state of the sliding door, resets the increase or decrease in the distance, measured at a right angle to the outer surfaces of the wall elements, between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame and thus prevents an opening movement of the door leaf support frame.
In this way, latching of the sliding door, which cannot be opened from a desired side of the building wall, can be implemented with simple means.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the latch comprises a rotary stop which is arranged on the torsion bar driven by the control groove of the control element and mounted on the door leaf support frame, and comprises a bar hingedly mounted in or on the control element and resiliently engaging in the rotary stop, the bar interacting with the rotary stop such that, after each closing process, a turning back of the torsion bar and thus a reset of the increase in the distance, measured at a right angle to the outer surfaces of the wall elements, between the door leaf and the door leaf support frame and thus a door opening process is prevented until either the traction means drive or a conscious manual application of force brings the bar out of engagement with the rotary stop in normal operation.
A latch according to this embodiment is inexpensive and can be implemented so as to be invisible from the outside.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, the conscious manual force with which a bolt assigned to one of the door leaves can be brought out of engagement with the rotary stop can be generated by manually pressing against an outer surface of a second door leaf arranged opposite.
In such an embodiment of a sliding door, the latch can only be overcome by the electrically activated traction means drive or by pressure on one of two door leaves. The lock is neither visible nor can it be unlocked by any manipulation from either of the two sides of the building wall.
In another possible embodiment of the sliding door, on the one hand, the door leaf support frame is guided in its uppermost region on the linear guide arranged above the door opening in such a way that the upper region can only be moved parallel to the linear guide, and, on the other hand, the door leaf support frame is guided in its lower region in a short guide arranged on the side of the door opening.
Such an embodiment of the sliding door has the advantage that in the region of the door opening the floor does not have to contain guides either for the door leaf support frame or for the door leaves and is therefore completely flat and free of grooves.
In the following, an embodiment of a sliding door according to the invention is described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings:
A door leaf 15.1, 15.2 is attached to both sides of the door leaf support frame 8 in such a way that a distance, measured at a right angle to the outer surfaces of the wall elements 3.1, 3.2, between the door leaves 15.1, 15.2 and the door leaf support frame 8 can be changed such that the door leaves can be positioned, in the open state of the sliding door 1, between the two wall elements 3.1, 3.2 and, in the closed state, in door openings 5 of the wall elements which are each assigned to one of the door leaves. In this closed state, the outer surfaces of the door leaves 15.1, 15.2 are aligned with the outer surfaces of the wall elements assigned to one of the door leaves. The horizontal section A-A through the sliding door 1 in the open state thereof shows schematically how the two door leaves 15.1, 15.2 are positioned between the two wall elements 3.1, 3.2 in the open state of the sliding door, the door leaves being mounted, via handlebar levers 16 forming a parallelogram guide system, on torsion bars 18, which are arranged vertically in the door leaf support frame 8 and pivotable about the vertical axis thereof, in such a way that the above-mentioned change in the distances between the door leaves and the door leaf support frame 8 can be carried out. The device for driving the handlebar levers 16 or for changing the distances between the door leaves 15.1, 15.2 and the door leaf support frame 8 is explained in more detail below with reference to
In order to generate the closing and opening movement of the door leaf support frame 8, the latter is equipped with a traction means drive 20, preferably in the form of a belt drive. The traction means drive 20 comprises an electric gear motor 21 which is fixed to the end of the upper cross-member 8.1 of the door leaf support frame 8 that is remote from the door closing edge 6.2.1, and which supports a drive pulley 22. Furthermore, the traction means drive 20 comprises two deflection pulleys 23 fixed to the end of the upper cross-member that is closer to the door closing edge 6.2.1, as well as the traction means 24, which is preferably designed as a belt and extends around the drive pulley and the two deflection pulleys. At a suitable point, the traction means 24 is fixed to a holding element 25 fixedly attached to the door frame, so that when the drive pulley 22 rotates, this results in a horizontal closing or opening movement of the door leaf support frame 8 and the door leaves 15.1, 15.2 mounted thereon.
Four torsion bars 18 extend between the upper cross-member 8.1 and the lower cross-member 8.2 of the door leaf support frame 8, which torsion bars are mounted in the cross-members so as to be pivotable about the longitudinal axes thereof. In each case, two of the four torsion bars are assigned to one of the two door leaves 15.1, 15.2, an upper and a lower handlebar lever 16 being fixed at one end to each of the torsion bars 18, and the handlebar levers having vertical-axis door leaf bearing points 17 at the other ends thereof, via which bearing points the handlebar levers 16 support and guide the door leaves 15.1, 15.2. The upper and lower handlebar levers 16 of two torsion bars in each case are coupled to an assigned door leaf 15.1, 15.2 in such a way that the door leaves are guided on a parallelogram guide system, as a result of which the door leaves always remain aligned parallel to the door leaf support frame when the distance thereof from the door leaf support frame 8 is changed.
In order to change the above-mentioned distances between the door leaves 15.1, 15.2 and the door leaf support frame 8, i.e. to generate the pivoting movements of the torsion bars 18 and thus the handlebar levers 16, there is a transmission mechanism (not visible in
The above-mentioned transmission mechanism and the door leaf movements generated are described in detail with reference to
It can be seen in
During an opening process of the sliding door, care must be taken in the initial region of the opening movement of the door leaf support frame 8 to reverse the first relative movement of the control element with respect to the door leaf support frame that occurred during the closing process. In the case of the sliding door shown in
In the embodiment of the sliding door shown in
In the embodiment shown in
The latch can be unlocked in two different ways.
When the sliding door is opened normally, the door leaf support frame 8 is driven in the opening direction by the traction means drive 21 (
The latch can, however, also be unlocked by a person pressing their hand against the outer surface of the door leaf 15.2, the drive lever 16 of which does not have a latch. This may be necessary, for example, in the event of a power failure or another defect. Via the handlebar lever 16 assigned to this door leaf 15.2, which lever is arranged on the same torsion bar 18 on which the drive lever 35 assigned to this door leaf is located, the slide bolt fixed in the second end of the drive lever is moved into the associated control groove of the control element by pressing on the door leaf 15.2, such that the drive lever exerts a force directed in the opening direction of the sliding door on its torsion bar and thus on the door leaf support frame. This force causes a relative movement between the door leaf support frame, in which the drive lever 35 with the latching stop 35.1 is mounted, and the control element 30 on which the latching pawl 45.1 is arranged. A slight relative movement is sufficient to bring the latching pawl out of engagement with the latching stop 35.1 on the drive lever 35 so that the distances between the door leaves and the door leaf support frame are minimized and the sliding door can be opened.
The drawing shows the situation of the transmission mechanism arranged on the right-hand side in
In the diagram shown in
In the following, formulas are derived that can be used to control the processing machine when producing the control grooves in the control element.
The coordinates of the curve points of the curve defining the control groove (37), which are dependent on the relative displacement xE between the door leaf support frame (8) and the control element (30), are denoted by xB and yB. The formulas are:
The results of the application of these formulas are plotted in
A sliding door according to the invention can also be designed with only a single door leaf if the aesthetics are not important in one of the rooms connected by the sliding door.
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the present invention has been described in what is considered to represent its preferred embodiment. However, it should be noted that the invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
19161711 | Mar 2019 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/055411 | 3/2/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/182513 | 9/17/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10136740 | Goppion | Nov 2018 | B2 |
20060032140 | Arimoto | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20140352220 | Rees | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20220106823 | Friedli | Apr 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
507815 | Aug 2010 | AT |
10163061 | Jun 2003 | DE |
10163061 | Feb 2007 | DE |
1731703 | Dec 2006 | EP |
2025854 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2871316 | May 2015 | EP |
2876241 | May 2015 | EP |
2662701 | Apr 2018 | ES |
WO-2009139016 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2018065653 | Apr 2018 | WO |
WO-2022078840 | Apr 2022 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220106823 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |