This application is a national phase of PCT application No. PCT/EP2018/000365, filed Jul. 20, 2018, which claims priority to IT patent application No. 102017000091124, filed Aug. 7, 2017, all of which are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
This invention relates to a sliding doors handling device.
More particularly, this invention relates to a device as defined above, especially suitable to allow the correct handling on the lower front of the doors that, on the opposite side, slide by means of carriages along an upper guide generally secured to the wall.
It is known that the sliding doors installed to allow the separation between two rooms are more and more widespread according to their practicality, since they do not require cantilevering spaces for opening and, in certain solutions, they are inserted, so disappearing, into a seat included between the opposite sides of the wall. Depending on these characteristics, the sliding doors are also appreciated from an aesthetic point of view, and are used not only in residential areas, but also in offices and commercial premises. To make the sliding of these doors possible and easy, specific devices have been designed, comprising carriages that are handled along an upper guide secured to the wall and, at the same time, secured to the upper end or header of the door to be handled; the connection between the carriages and the door is made, according to a known solution, through an appendage integral with the lower part of each carriage, which projects from a slot extending longitudinally in the aforesaid guide. Said appendage on its free end has a plate or the like that, by means of screws or equivalent retaining means, is secured to the door.
As an alternative, the door is provided, on the internal side facing the wall, with a shaped profile section whose upper part defines an embossed profile section complementary to that of a pair of wheels or rollers of a fixed carriage, i.e. secured to the wall; the door is then hooked to said rollers and its handling for opening and closing is achieved by sliding the section on the wheels or rollers of the fixed carriage. This second and also known embodiment is even more advantageous given that the device as a whole remains hidden from view, except for a plastic cap that closes both opposite headers of the profile section. In both the first and second hypotheses, an opposed lower guide completes the device; it is secured to the floor and is defined by an appendage protruding like a pin or the like that, reaching upwards, inserts and engages along a longitudinal slot, specially obtained at the lower end of the door. The sliding of the door on the upper side takes place precisely and easily, given the presence of the aforementioned devices that, in addition to the carriages, also comprise means for controlling and braking the door, as well as for preventing accidental overriding of the guide that defines the sliding line.
On the opposite lower side, on the other hand, the guided handling of the door is entrusted only to the appendage that protrudes from the floor and that cooperates with the longitudinal slot along the lower edge of the door itself. This solution involves significant drawbacks, which are, for example, the formation of gaps; in fact, with the passage of time, an imprecise and difficult sliding can occur, also as a function of the variable weight of the door, which can be relevant if it is a glass door. The relevant weight, which may derive from the use of solid wood or glass to manufacture the door, may give rise during the sliding of the door itself to significant vertical thrusts that are not amortized by anything. In order to overcome these drawbacks, a floor sliding door mechanism has been devised, described in EP 2 646 635, which provides, in addition to the floor appendage, engaged in the longitudinal slot of the door or in a metal guide arranged in said slot, the use of a fork support for a wheel; between the support and the wheel, at least one flexible plate is interposed acting as a spring; depending on the weight of the door, the use of a greater or lesser number of such plates is envisaged. The wheel is housed in a seat formed along the lower edge of the door, from which it protrudes partly to roll along the floor and facilitates handling of the door at the lower end. Overall, it is a mechanism that improves the sliding of the door compared to the traditional solution mentioned above, at least partly absorbing the vertical thrusts due, for example, to the irregularities of the floor or the presence of large joints between a tile and the other.
However, it has been noted that this solution also shows a series of drawbacks, both of operation and connected to the assembly of the mechanism on the door. A first drawback, in the case of wooden doors, concerns the fact that the mechanism with the wheel, arranged in the seat formed at the base of the door itself, is constantly subjected to stresses and vertical thrusts, which are absorbed only by the elastic sheet and that, however, determine an appreciable level of noise; therefore, depending on the type of more or less heavy door as well as the type of more or less smooth floor, it is necessary to use a greater or lesser number of said sheets, which, during assembly of the mechanism, are interposed between the relevant support and the wheel. A further drawback concerns the possibility that the mechanism with the wheel and the door as a whole suffer violent shocks reaching the end of stroke, with the consequent risk that such shocks may negatively affect not only said mechanism, but also the sliding devices placed above. In the solution described in the aforementioned European patent, moreover, the mechanism comprising the wheel requires particular attention when it is mounted on the door; this operation is laborious, being, among other things, required the use of a specific spacer to be prepared and secured to the door itself. Moreover, if the mechanism as a whole is not correctly mounted in the seat created on the door, taking into account the correct sense of insertion in the same seat, its operation can easily be unsatisfactory if not completely compromised. In this case, the need to disassemble the whole assembly, also disengaging the door from the upper guides to intervene on it along the lower edge that accommodates said mechanism, involves a long and laborious restoration of the correct functionality, thus leading to a significant increase in installation costs.
EP 2,646,635 discloses the solution of manufacturing a sliding door comprising a door able to move between two end opening and closing positions; said door is provided with means for supporting and guiding the door, which, in turn, comprise rotating elements for slidably supporting longitudinal guide devices, secured above the door and also associated with its lower edge.
DE 1269537 describes a device for moving sliding doors comprising a containment shell, a fork frame, a wheel and an elastic plate secured to the shell. Said sheet, which has the function of allowing rapid assembly of the device, by blocking the skid, does not perform any function of absorbing the stresses that occur when the door slides.
The object of the present invention is to obviate the aforementioned drawbacks.
More particularly, the purpose of this invention is that of providing a sliding doors floor handling device that allows to absorb the stresses and the vertical thrusts in an optimal manner, thus eliminating at the same time the discomfort deriving from a high level of noise.
A further purpose of the invention is to provide a device as defined above that is able to prevent the door from being subjected to violent shocks reaching the end of stroke.
Not least purpose of the invention is to provide a sliding doors floor handling device, which can be installed in an easy and rapid manner, away from any malfunctions deriving from incorrect assembly.
A further purpose of the invention is to provide a device suitable for use both for wooden doors and glass or crystal ones.
A further purpose of the invention is to provide users with a sliding doors floor handling device, designed to guarantee a high level of resistance and reliability over time, such as to be easily and economically manufactured.
These and still other purposes are achieved by the sliding doors floor handling device of this invention, according to the main claim.
The constructive and functional characteristics of the device of this invention can be better understood from the detailed description below, in which reference is made to the attached tables of drawings showing a preferred and non-limiting embodiment thereof and in which:
With the initial reference to
The device of the invention, indicated as a whole with 20 in
The fork-shaped frame 44 is joined to at least one elastic sheet 60, consisting of a rectangular-shaped metal plate, as can be seen in particular in
The latter, provided with wheel 46 and with elastic metal sheets 60, is secured to the shell 26, as shown schematically in
The shell 26, as shown in
Also in the case of a door with glass or crystal, therefore, the device of the invention performs the same effective function described above in relation to the wooden doors, with results even more appreciable being generally the door with glass significantly heavier than that made of wood.
As can be seen from the foregoing, the advantages that the invention achieves are evident.
The sliding doors floor handling device of this invention allows effective absorption of vertical stresses and thrusts; the presence of a shock-absorbing element 40, which partly protrudes from the shell 26, prevents the door from being subjected to violent impacts when reaching the end of the stroke, while the elastomeric pad 42 and the coating 50 of the wheel 46 further dampen the vertical thrusts, thus reducing at the same time the noise deriving from the sliding of the wheel 46 on non-smooth areas of the floor 48.
Furthermore, the device of the invention can be easily installed, both on wooden and glass doors, away from possible malfunctions deriving from incorrect assembly.
Particularly advantageous is the possibility of manufacturing a single body consisting of the fork-shaped frame 44, the wheel 46 and the elastic sheets 60, which considerably facilitates the installation of the assembly.
Although the invention has been described above with reference to a possible embodiment thereof, given by way of non-limiting example, numerous changes and variations will be apparent to a person skilled in the art in the light of the above description. This invention, therefore, intends to embrace all changes and variations that fall within the spirit and in the protective scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102017000091124 | Aug 2017 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/000365 | 7/20/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/029838 | 2/14/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3090084 | Banner | May 1963 | A |
3283444 | Andres | Nov 1966 | A |
3299575 | Du Shane | Jan 1967 | A |
3442052 | Levine | May 1969 | A |
3512209 | Povoden | May 1970 | A |
3670357 | Steigerwald | Jun 1972 | A |
3716890 | Benson | Feb 1973 | A |
3722028 | Schoenbrod | Mar 1973 | A |
3731431 | Banner | May 1973 | A |
4030160 | Lambertz | Jun 1977 | A |
4112622 | Stewart | Sep 1978 | A |
4189870 | Helmick | Feb 1980 | A |
4353186 | Offterdinger | Oct 1982 | A |
4559669 | Bonzer | Dec 1985 | A |
4805262 | Marshik | Feb 1989 | A |
4873741 | Riegelman | Oct 1989 | A |
4899493 | Baumgarten | Feb 1990 | A |
5448796 | Larson | Sep 1995 | A |
5791089 | Prevot | Aug 1998 | A |
7293389 | Jacobs | Nov 2007 | B2 |
9611684 | Zimmer | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20040055108 | Lemeur, Jr. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050011041 | Ness | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060185121 | Hilger | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20160159616 | Rasanen | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1269537 | Jul 1936 | DE |
2646635 | Jan 2017 | EP |
2016027062 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, dated Nov. 26, 2018 for corresponding PCT patent application No. PCT/EP2018/000365. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority, dated Nov. 26, 2018 for corresponding PCT patent application No. PCT/EP2018/000365. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200157865 A1 | May 2020 | US |