There is described a sliding engagement for a stacking delivery tray having a sliding surface that has breaks.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,699,172 (McTavish et al.) entitled “Stacking Delivery Tray” discloses a stacking delivery tray that has two operative positions to accommodate different sizes of product. When these delivery trays are stacked, in order to add or remove an overlying tray, it must slide along the underlying tray. In a first or lower operative position, the overlying tray slides along a top shelf. In a second or higher operative position, the overlying tray slides along a top rail which is raised above the top shelf. In order to accommodate the two operative positions, the McTavish et al. stacking delivery tray has a top rail with breaks in it and a top shelf with breaks in it. These breaks are referred to by McTavish et. al as valleys. In view of this, it is difficult, if not impossible, to get a smooth linear sliding action along either the top rail or the top shelf. What is required is a modified sliding engagement which will facilitate a smoother more linear sliding relationship between the underlying tray and the overlying tray.
There is provided a sliding engagement for a stacking delivery tray having a sliding surface that has breaks. The sliding engagement includes at least one ramp on the sliding surface providing an inclined sliding transition to an end of an overlying tray sliding along the sliding surface in order to traverse the break in the sliding surface.
With most stacking delivery trays, the point requiring transition is spaced from one or both of the ends. For this reason it is preferred that the at least one ramp is spaced from one end of the stacking delivery tray and has an upward incline toward said one end.
The problem with breaks in the sliding surface is most frequently found in two position stacking delivery trays. When the stacking delivery tray is a two position stacking delivery tray there are two sliding surfaces. A first sliding surface is in the form of a top shelf or ledge providing a lower operative position. A second sliding surface is in the form of a top rail that is parallel to, but raised above, the top shelf providing a higher operative position. There is at least one ramp on the top shelf providing an inclined sliding transition to an end of an overlying tray sliding along the top shelf in the lower operative position in order to traverse the break in the top shelf. There is at least one ramp on the top rail providing an inclined sliding transition to an end of an overlying tray sliding along the top shelf in the higher operative position in order to traverse a break in the top rail.
Although beneficial result may be obtained through use of the sliding engagement described above, the sliding engagement is improved even more when the at least one ramp on the top shelf also provides an inclined sliding transition to lift an end of an overlying tray sliding along the top rail in the higher operative position in order to traverse the break in the top rail. Similarly, the at least one ramp on the top rail also provides an inclined sliding transition to lower an overlying tray sliding along the top shelf in the lower operative position in order to traverse the break in the top shelf.
These and other features will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings, the drawings are for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to be in any way limiting, wherein:
A sliding engagement for a stacking delivery tray having a sliding surface with breaks will now be described with reference to
Structure and Relationship of Parts:
Referring to
Sliding engagement 10 has a lower operative position illustrated in
Operation:
Referring to
In this patent document, the word “comprising” is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
The following claims are to be understood to include what is specifically illustrated and described above, what is conceptually equivalent, and what can be obviously substituted. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the described embodiments can be configured without departing from the scope of the claims. The illustrated embodiments have been set forth only as examples and should not be taken as limiting the invention. It is to be understood that, within the scope of the following claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically illustrated and described.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2715552 | Sep 2010 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2456481 | Ballantyne et al. | Dec 1948 | A |
2599727 | Schmidt | Jun 1952 | A |
2852157 | Frater | Sep 1958 | A |
2889072 | Lapham | Jun 1959 | A |
3270913 | Bridenstine | Sep 1966 | A |
3326410 | Asenbauer | Jun 1967 | A |
3331529 | Slapnik | Jul 1967 | A |
3387740 | Bockenstette | Jun 1968 | A |
3420402 | Frater | Jan 1969 | A |
3430806 | Munk | Mar 1969 | A |
3438544 | Cloyd | Apr 1969 | A |
3675815 | Rehrig | Jul 1972 | A |
3780905 | Herolzer | Dec 1973 | A |
4000817 | Sanders et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4139098 | Mollon | Feb 1979 | A |
4205749 | Carroll | Jun 1980 | A |
4316540 | Lapham | Feb 1982 | A |
4416374 | Smith | Nov 1983 | A |
4426001 | Stahl | Jan 1984 | A |
4960207 | Tabler | Oct 1990 | A |
5035326 | Stahl | Jul 1991 | A |
5287966 | Stahl | Feb 1994 | A |
5344022 | Stahl | Sep 1994 | A |
5881902 | Ackermann | Mar 1999 | A |
6260706 | Koefelda | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273259 | Stahl | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6394274 | Cheeseman | May 2002 | B1 |
D598684 | Stahl | Aug 2009 | S |
7699172 | McTavish | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7837037 | McTavish | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7861864 | Hassell et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20040060844 | Stahl | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050183980 | Fernandez et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060070906 | Verna et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070187276 | Stahl | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20100230317 | Cook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 276 863 | Feb 2000 | CA |
WO 2006089407 | Feb 2006 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120074022 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |