Under-Balanced Drilling
When drilling oil or gas wells, it is often desirable to drill certain formations in an under-balanced condition. Under-balanced drilling means that the hydrostatic column of drilling fluid is less than the reservoir pressure of the formation being drilled. Drilling under-balanced can be especially important when drilling horizontal wells in coal seams.
Coal seams typically possess certain permeability due to a natural cleat system. Under-balanced drilling is important in order to protect that permeability. If a coal seam well is drilled over-balanced, drilling fluid, and the solid material within the drilling fluid, can invade the cleat system of the coal. This will cause damage to the natural permeability and will likely hinder future gas production. Another problem associated with overbalanced drilling is “lost circulation”. This can be a problem in horizontal coal wells particularly after a large amount of horizontal footage has already been drilled. As drilling fluid is lost into the formation, it may be impossible to keep adequate drilling fluid returning to the surface, thus affecting both hole-cleaning, as well as the ability to maintain an adequate supply of drilling fluid at the rig site. Also related to lost circulation is the phenomenon known as differential sticking. When a negative pressure differential exists between the borehole and the formation, the drill pipe can become stuck against the wall of the wellbore.
There are a number of under-balanced drilling methods available. Frequently, a gas phase drilling fluid is selected. Compressible fluids such as air or nitrogen are usually mixed with small amounts of liquids to form a mist or foam. Another method of under-balanced drilling involves the use of what is commonly called a parasite string. A parasite string refers to an extra conduit that is installed in a well and used to inject a gas at a certain location in the well in order to reduce the density of the liquid drilling mud returns. From the point where the gas is injected, the fluid returning to the surface becomes less dense, and the hydrostatic pressure on the formation can be reduced to an under-balanced condition.
Use of Parasite Strings in Under-Balanced Drilling
Parasite strings are ideally suited for use in under-balance drilling operations since the primary drilling fluid flowing through the bit remains a non-compressible liquid drilling mud. The non-compressible nature of liquid drilling mud allows the use of simple, low-cost mud-pulse telemetry equipment to communicate with any down-hole survey instruments that are necessary for guidance while drilling directional or horizontal wells. Yet another benefit of mud-based fluids is that, compared to low viscosity fluids such as gases, foams, or mists, drilling mud has far superior hole-cleaning properties. Additionally, when compressible gas drilling fluids are used to power progressing cavity down-hole motors, fluctuation in weight on the bit can cause large fluctuations in the speed of the motor. High motor speeds and the associated motor vibration can significantly damage or reduce the life of the electronic guidance systems.
Numerous parasite configurations have been employed in the past. In some cases, a tubing string is run in the well alongside the casing, and both are then cemented into place. In another configuration, an annulus formed by an additional inner casing string forms the necessary conduit to convey the gas to the injection point. While both of these configurations can functionally form the additional gas conveying conduit, in either case, a larger borehole diameter and a larger curve radius are required when compared to a non-parasite well configuration.
As an example and referring to
Referring to
In the example illustrated in
The alternate configuration of utilizing a non-concentric gas injection tubing string alongside the 7 inch casing provides no greater savings in efficiency. In this configuration, both a 7 inch casing and a 2⅜″ gas injection string are connected and simultaneously run into the well side-by-side (not shown). Unfortunately, compared to non-parasite drilling well configurations, enlarged hole-sizes are again required to accommodate a 2⅜ inch tubing string beside the 7 inch parasite string 240. There are also complications in running the relatively fragile tubing beside the 7 inch casing.
Extended Reach Drilling
Extending the reach of a horizontal well is a cost efficient method of adding additional production and reserves to the well for a relatively small incremental drilling cost. This is particularly true for horizontal wells, where the fixed cost components of drilling the well, such as building the access road and location, constructing surface facilities, setting surface casing and drilling the curve to horizontal, can easily exceed the cost of drilling the horizontal section of the well. Most often, the ultimate length that a well can be drilled is determined by the friction of the drill pipe rotating and sliding against the walls of the wellbore.
In drilling vertical wells, maintaining adequate weight on the drill bit is not a problem. In horizontal drilling however, the weight of the drill pipe in the vertical section of the well must be sufficient to push the drill-pipe out into the horizontal section of the well. When the friction forces of the pipe sliding in the horizontal section of the well approaches the gravity force (weight) of the pipe in the vertical section, insufficient weight is applied to the bit, and drilling efficiency initially slows, then stops. Since coalbed methane is typically produced from shallow formations, insufficient weight on the bit frequently limits the reach or length of these wells. Various techniques are employed to extend the reach of shallow horizontal wells. These reach extending methods can be grouped into two broad categories; 1) those that reduce the friction of the drill pipe, and 2) those that increase the weight applied to the drill-pipe.
Although friction reducing chemicals such as polymers can be added to the drilling mud, there is always a risk of formation damage if these chemicals invade the fracture or cleat system of the productive formation. As such, friction reduction is most often achieved by ensuring some amount of movement of the drill-pipe. In doing so, the friction that must be overcome is the kinetic or dynamic friction rather than static friction. Dynamic friction of the drill pipe in motion is typically only 60%-70% of the static friction of drill pipe at rest. Rotary-steerable directional drilling systems are available that allow the well to be directionally steered while the drill-pipe remains in constant rotational motion. These systems perform well, but they are relatively expensive to build and maintain.
More commonly, horizontal drilling utilizes a down-hole motor with an oriented bend to directionally steer the well. In order to break the static friction, frequently the driller simply “rocks” the drill pipe back-and-forth, alternating with a small amount of clockwise and counter-clockwise rotation. Although attempts have been made to automate this process, it remains a relatively imprecise technique. Further, since rotation is only applied in cycles of left, then right movement, at each direction change, movement of the drill pipe momentarily stops and static friction again prevails.
In some cases, a device can be deployed in the well that induces axial vibration into the drill-pipe. These devices are installed in the drill string and utilize a water hammer principle to agitate the drill-pipe. Although these devices can be quite efficient at creating friction-reducing vibration in the pipe, those same vibrations can cause damage to the electronic equipment used for guidance and telemetry in steering the well.
All references cited herein are incorporated by reference.
The problems presented by existing systems and methods for drilling wells are solved by the systems and methods of the illustrative embodiments described herein. In one embodiment, a system for drilling a well having a wellbore is provided. The system includes a first pipe string positioned in the wellbore. A first annulus is present between the first pipe string and the wellbore. A second pipe string, smaller in diameter than the first pipe string, is positioned within the first pipe string to form a second annulus between the first pipe string and the second pipe string. The second pipe string is configured to be attached to a drill bit. A fluid source at or near a surface of the well is in communication with one of the first annulus and the second annulus to deliver a first fluid through the one of the first annulus and the second annulus to the other of the first annulus and the second annulus at a downhole location uphole of the drill bit. The other of the first annulus and the second annulus receives a drilling fluid from the second pipe string and permits delivery of a mixture of the drilling fluid and the first fluid from the downhole location to the surface of the well. An inner diameter of the first pipe string is sized to be less than a diameter of a hole being drilled.
In another embodiment, a system for drilling a well having a wellbore includes a first pipe string positioned in the wellbore to form a first annulus between the first pipe string and the wellbore. A second pipe string, smaller in diameter than the first pipe string, is positioned within the first pipe string to form a second annulus between the first pipe string and the second pipe string. The second pipe string is configured to be attached to a drill bit. A lubrication source is in communication with the second annulus and is capable of delivering a lubricant to the second annulus to reduce a coefficient of friction between the first pipe string and the second pipe string. An inner diameter of the first pipe string is sized to be less than a diameter of a hole being drilled.
In still another embodiment, a system for drilling a well having a wellbore includes a first pipe string positioned in the wellbore. A first annulus is present between the first pipe string and the wellbore. A second pipe string, smaller in diameter than the first pipe string, is positioned within the first pipe string to form a second annulus between the first pipe string and the second pipe string. The second pipe string is configured to be attached to a drill bit. A rotator is operably associated with the first pipe string to rotate the first pipe string.
In another embodiment, a method is provided for drilling a well having a wellbore. The method includes inserting a drill string operably attached to a drill bit into the wellbore. After inserting the drill string, a parasite string is inserted into the wellbore such that at least a portion of the drill string is within the parasite string. The drill string is rotated at a first speed, and the parasite string is rotated at a second speed to decrease a friction force between the drill string and the parasite string.
In yet another embodiment, a method of drilling a well having a wellbore includes inserting a drill string operably attached to a drill bit into the wellbore. After inserting the drill string, a parasite string is inserted into the wellbore such that at least a portion of the drill string is within the parasite string. A drilling fluid is delivered through the drill string to the drill bit and is returned to a surface of the well through a first annulus formed between the parasite string and the wellbore. A first fluid is delivered through a second annulus to a downhole location uphole of the drill bit. The second annulus is present between the drill string and the parasite string. The first fluid and the drill fluid are combined in the first annulus at the downhole location.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become apparent with reference to the drawings, detailed description, and claims that follow.
In the following detailed description of the illustrative embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical structural, mechanical, electrical, and chemical changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments described herein, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the illustrative embodiments are defined only by the appended claims.
The illustrative embodiments described herein include systems and methods for drilling deviated and horizontal wells. There are numerous benefits to these systems and methods, including optimized under-balanced drilling, as well as reduced torque and drag. In one embodiment of the invention involving a horizontal well, after the well is drilled to the desired horizon, an outer drill-pipe is installed over the existing drill-pipe, forming substantially concentric strings of drill-pipe. The outer drill-pipe is only slightly larger than the inner drill-pipe, and thus both pipes have similar capabilities in regard to bending radius. The outer pipe is restrained at the surface to resist the rotational torque and axial thrust of the inner pipe. Drilling continues and an annulus between the two pipes serves as a conduit for introduction of a gas to achieve lower bottom-hole pressure. In order to reduce friction and extend the reach of the well, the outer pipe may be independently rotated in relation to the inner pipe such that a static-friction condition of one or both of the drill-pipes is eliminated. Lubricant may also be injected between the inner drill pipe and outer drill pipe sheath to further reduce friction.
Referring more specifically to
The system 306 includes a first pipe string, or parasite string 340 and a second pipe string, or drill string 344. The terms pipe string, drill string, or parasite string as used herein generally describe a plurality of individual sections of pipes, tubing, or conduit that are connected together by couplings or other means to form the string. While the cross-sectional shape of the pipes, tubing, or conduit could be any shape, typically the cross-sectional shape will be circular. The lengths of the individual pipes, tubing, or conduit may be any length that is easily manageable at a particular drill site, but for a typical well, the length may be between about 10 and 50 feet. When assembled, the pipe string, drill string, or parasite strings described herein may include a substantially continuous passage that permits flow of fluids within the passage.
The first pipe string 340 and the second pipe string 344 are positioned in the wellbore 314, and the second pipe string 344 is positioned within the first pipe string 340. The second pipe string 344 may be operably attached at a downhole end to a downhole motor 348, which is operably attached to and is capable of driving a drill bit 352. The first pipe string 340 is sized such than an inner diameter, D1, of a passage 356 of the first pipe string 340 is greater than an outer diameter, D2, of the second pipe string 344 (see
In one embodiment, the first pipe string 340 is sized in such a manner to allow the first pipe string 340 to fit relatively snuggly over the second pipe string 344 similar to a sheath, and performing the function of the outer section of a sleeve bearing. In such an embodiment, the annular space between the two strings may be such that the smaller string is about one inch (1 in) less that the larger string. In other words, the difference between the inner diameter, D1, of the first pipe string 340 and the outer diameter, D2, of the second pipe string 344 is about one inch (1 in).
In another embodiment, the first and second pipe strings may be sized such that the ratio of the outer diameter, D2, of the second pipe string 344 to the inner diameter, D1, of the first pipe string 340 is greater than about 0.5 (D2/D1>about 0.5).
In another embodiment, the first and second pipe strings may be sized such that the acceptable radius of curvature of the first pipe string 340 is less than about three times (3×) the acceptable radius of curvature of the second pipe string 344. More preferably, the acceptable radius of curvature of the first pipe string 340 is less than about two times (2×) the acceptable radius of curvature of the second pipe string 344. As used herein, the term “acceptable radius of curvature” refers to a bending radius at which the pipe string substantially remains within its elastic bending limit and does not experience a failure of the coupling mechanisms associated with the pipe string.
In one embodiment, the second pipe string 344 is positioned substantially concentrically within the first pipe string 340. This may be accomplished by positioning spacers or bearings between the first pipe string 340 and the second pipe string 344, or alternatively may be accomplished without spacers or bearings. Similarly, the first and second pipe strings may or may not be axially constrained relative to one another. In one embodiment, each of the individual sections of pipe, tubing or conduit that make up the first pipe string 340 is substantially axially constrained relative to one of the individual sections of pipe, tubing or conduit that make up the second pipe string 344. Axial constraint of each section of the first pipe string 340 relative to the section of second pipe string 344 that is nested within allows sections of the dual-pipe string to be more easily and quickly added to the well 310.
It is important to note that while the second pipe string 344 is described as being within the first pipe string 340, use of the term “within” is not meant to imply that the second pipe string 344 is surrounded or encompassed by the first pipe string 340 along the entire length of the second pipe string 344. In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring more specifically to
Referring still to
In
Referring more specifically to
To further reduced friction, a lubrication source 372 may be provided in communication with the second annulus 364 via a conduit similar to supply conduit 361. In one embodiment, a small amount of lubricant is injected in the gas stream injected into the second annulus 364. This lubricant is carried along with the gas in the second annulus 364. Once the pipe surfaces are initially coated, only a small amount of additional lubricant needs to be injected to compensate for loss. The mating surfaces of the first pipe string 340 and second pipe string 344 can now easily slide because the friction coefficient of the lubricated pipe is only 20%-30% that of non-lubricated pipe.
Referring to
As indicated by arrow 370, second pipe string 344 is rotated in a second direction at a second speed. Second pipe string 344 may be rotated by a second rotator (not shown), or alternatively may be rotated by rotator 612. While arrows 616 and 370 in
In one embodiment, the first pipe string 340 may be rotated at a speed of between about one to ten revolutions per minute (1 to 10 rpm), while the second pipe string 344 is not rotated, as would be the case in coil tubing drilling, or during the slide drilling phase of a jointed pipe directional drilling operation. Although not being rotated itself, the friction forces exerted upon the second pipe string are dynamic rather than static in nature, thus allowing a greater amount of axial and rotational forces to be transmitted to the bit. This low speed rotation of the first pipe string consumes little power and creates little wear of the first pipe string 340.
In still another embodiment, either the first pipe string 340 or the second pipe string 344 may be permitted to freely rotate without being directly or actively powered by the rotator that rotates the other of the first and second pipe strings. In this configuration, rotation may be imparted via frictional forces to the “freewheeling” pipe string by the pipe string that is actively rotated.
Referring to
Referring again to 742, if the desired length of the well has not been reached, a determination may be made at 758 regarding the amount of torque and drag that is being placed on the inner drill pipe. If an excessive amount of torque or drag is present, then additional lengths of outer pipe may be placed in the wellbore over the inner pipe, as indicated by step 726. If the torque and drag are not excessive, drilling continues at 738, and new sections of inner drill pipe are added to the well as needed to increase the length of the well.
The dual pipe string configuration of the slim-hole parasite system 306, and the methods described herein, provide multiple benefits, one of which is the ability of the system 306 to promote under-balanced drilling without the inherent problems associated with existing parasite systems. Due to the closely matched relative sizing of the first pipe string 340 and second pipe string 344, the system 306 is capable of providing gas injection downhole without requiring the drilling or formation of wellbores having excessively large diameter.
To better illustrate this advantage, an example is provided for comparison with the example previously presented utilizing a traditional parasite string. In the illustrative example, a system similar to system 306 is used to drill, with 7 inch casing set above a 150 foot radius, 6¼ inch curved section. Upon the start of the drilling of the horizontal section, and with the bottom-hole assembly (i.e. drill motor and drill bit) resting on the bottom of the well, a 4½ inch parasite string is run over the 2⅞ inch drill string and then hung from the wellhead. Under-balanced drilling can then begin. As drilling mud is pumped down the drill string, a gas is injected in the annulus between the 4½ inch parasite string and the drill string. The gas and drilling mud returning from the bit mix at the end of the 4½ inch parasite string. The aerated return mixture of drilling mud flows up to surface through the annulus formed by the 7 inch casing and the 4½ inch parasite string.
Another benefit of the slim-hole parasite system 306 is that the system 306 allows extension of the length of a well by reducing the downhole friction forces on the drill string. An additional benefit of reduced friction is the reduction of pipe wear. Drilling horizontal wells through even mildly abrasive formations can significantly limit the life of the drill pipe. The metal on metal contact of the drill pipe within its temporary outer sheath can be far less damaging than the drill-pipe rubbing against the exposed rock surface of the wellbore. The life of the drill-pipe can be yet further extended by the use of lubricants between the two metal surfaces.
Incremental friction reduction will occur for every incremental extension of the dual-string pipe. Although a first section of the parasite string may be run immediately after the well has landed horizontally (for introduction of gas in a parasite drilling configuration), additional sections of the friction-reducing parasite string may be added at desired intervals while drilling as the length of the well increases. At some point, accumulated drag forces may dictate the maximum length of the rotating parasite string, at which point drilling would continue with no additional sections of the parasite string being added.
Yet another benefit of the illustrative embodiments includes the ability of the dual pipe string configuration to prevent the phenomena known as “helical lock-up”. Helical lock-up occurs when drilling with relatively slim diameter drill-pipe within a relatively large confining wellbore diameter. The problem can be aggravated when drilling shallow wells in which a “pull-down” rig is utilized to add weight to the bit by pushing the drill pipe into the well. In these situations, the drill pipe will buckle and helically spiral about the wellbore. The downward force of the drill pipe is translated to an outward force of the drill pipe against the wall of the well, and the drill pipe becomes “locked” and no further movement occurs. In utilizing the slim diameter outer drill-pipe sheath, or parasite string, surrounding the inner drill-pipe, similar in action to the outer jacket of a throttle cable, helical lock-up is prevented from occurring. As such, a greater amount of the drill-rig-applied force pushing on the drill pipe is transferred to the bit.
Numerous enhancements and embellishments to the dual pipe string drilling configuration are envisioned. Broadly, the concept involves utilizing a dual, substantially concentric pipe string while drilling, such that the two strings are independently free to rotate relative to and slide through one another. Torque and thrust for drilling are conveyed to the inner pipe. The outer pipe is restrained at the surface to resist any thrust transferred to the outer pipe by way of the axial movement of the inner pipe. It is envisioned that the outer pipe is only slightly larger than the diameter of the inner drill-pipe, yet smaller in diameter than the drill bit.
The dual pipe string configuration may be utilized in most conventional well configurations, and does not require a larger diameter wellbore. While the systems and methods of the illustrative embodiments are primarily described as being used in drilling wells to access subterranean deposits, it is important to note that these systems and methods could be applied to any situations where earthen or subterranean drilling is required. These systems and methods may also be used to drill wells having horizontal sections as described herein, or alternatively with wells that will not include horizontal sections. The benefits and advantages of the systems and methods are applicable to any well for which it is desired to reduce frictional forces during drilling or to inject a second circuit of drilling fluid at a point behind the bit.
It should be apparent from the foregoing that an invention having significant advantages has been provided. While the invention is shown in only a few of its forms, it is not just limited but is susceptible to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/010,475 filed Jan. 2, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4100981 | Chaffin | Jul 1978 | A |
4697651 | Dellinger | Oct 1987 | A |
4913466 | Becker | Apr 1990 | A |
5069297 | Krueger et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5337839 | Warren et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5720356 | Gardes | Feb 1998 | A |
5865261 | Cooper et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6065550 | Gardes | May 2000 | A |
6280000 | Zupanick | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6357523 | Zupanick | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6412556 | Zupanick | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425448 | Zupanick et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439320 | Zupanick | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6454000 | Zupanick | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457540 | Gardes | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6478085 | Zupanick | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6497556 | Zupanick et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6561288 | Zupanick | May 2003 | B2 |
6571888 | Comeau et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575235 | Zupanick et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6588518 | Eddison | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6595301 | Zupanick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598686 | Zupanick | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604580 | Zupanick et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604910 | Zupanick | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607042 | Hoyer et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6662870 | Zupanick | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668918 | Zupanick | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679322 | Zupanick | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681855 | Zupanick et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6688388 | Zupanick | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6708764 | Zupanick | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6722452 | Rial et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725922 | Zupanick | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732792 | Zupanick | May 2004 | B2 |
6745855 | Gardes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802379 | Dawson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6848508 | Zupanick | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6851479 | Zupanick et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6892829 | Livingstone | May 2005 | B2 |
6923275 | Gardes | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942030 | Zupanick | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945755 | Zupanick et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953088 | Rial et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962216 | Zupanick | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964298 | Zupanick | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964308 | Zupanick | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976533 | Zupanick | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976547 | Rial et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6986388 | Zupanick et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988548 | Diamond et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988566 | Zupanick | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991047 | Zupanick | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991048 | Zupanick | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7007758 | Zupanick et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025137 | Zupanick | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025154 | Zupanick | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036584 | Zupanick et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048049 | Zupanick | May 2006 | B2 |
7073595 | Zupanick et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086470 | Diamond et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7090009 | Zupanick | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7096979 | Haci et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7134494 | Zupanick et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152700 | Church et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7178611 | Zupanick | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182157 | Zupanick | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185718 | Gardes | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7204327 | Livingstone | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207395 | Zupanick | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213644 | Zupanick | May 2007 | B1 |
7222670 | Zupanick | May 2007 | B2 |
7225872 | Zupanick | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243738 | Gardes | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7264048 | Zupanick et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7311150 | Zupanick | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7353877 | Zupanick | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7360595 | Zupanick et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7434620 | Zupanick | Oct 2008 | B1 |
20010010432 | Zupanick | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010015574 | Zupanick | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020108746 | Zupanick | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117297 | Zupanick | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020134546 | Zupanick | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020148605 | Zupanick | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020148613 | Zupanick | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020148647 | Zupanick | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155003 | Zupanick | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020189801 | Zupanick | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030075322 | Zupanick | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030173088 | Livingstone | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030217842 | Zupanick | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040031609 | Zupanick | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040079553 | Livingstone | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084183 | Zupanick | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104030 | Livingstone | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040149432 | Zupanick | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040154802 | Zupanick | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040159436 | Zupanick | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040206493 | Zupanick | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040226719 | Morgan | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244974 | Zupanick | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029016 | Self et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050079063 | Zupanick | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087340 | Zupanick | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050103527 | Church et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115709 | Zupanick | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133219 | Zupanick | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050167156 | Zupanick | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211471 | Zupanick | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050211473 | Zupanick | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050257962 | Zupanick | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050284664 | Riel et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060096755 | Zupanick | May 2006 | A1 |
20080060571 | Zupanick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060799 | Zupanick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060804 | Zupanick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060805 | Zupanick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060806 | Zupanick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080060807 | Zupanick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066903 | Zupanick | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090084534 | Zupanick | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090173543 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61010475 | Jan 2008 | US |