1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates generally to wellbore packer assemblies and, in particular aspects, to the design of slip devices that are carried upon such packer assemblies.
2. Description of the Related Art
Traditional packers are comprised of an elastomeric sealing element and at least one mechanically set slip. Typically, a setting tool is run in with the packer to set it. The setting can be accomplished hydraulically due to relative movement created by the setting tool when subjected to applied pressure. This relative movement causes the slips to ride up on cones and extend into biting engagement with the surrounding tubular. At the same time, the sealing element is compressed into sealing contact with the surrounding tubular. The set can be held by a body lock ring, which would prevent the reversal of the relative movement that caused the packer to be set in the first instance.
As an alternative to applying pressure through the tubing to the setting tool to cause the packer to set, another alternative was to run the packer in on wire line with a known electrically-operated setting tool, such as an “E-4”-style setting tool that is available commercially from Baker Oil Tools of Houston, Tex. In setting the packer device, a signal fires the E-4 causing the requisite relative movement for setting. If the packer device is of a retrievable type, a retrieving tool could later be run into the set packer and release the grip of the lock ring and allow movement of the slips back down their respective cones and a stretching out of the sealing element so that the packer device can be removed from the well.
Some packer designs seek to create an engagement of packer element slips or wickers by direct radial expansion of an expansion mandrel that carries slips or wickers. Examples of such expandable packer designs are found in a parent application to this one, U.S. Patent Publication No. U.S. 2005/0028989 A1. This Publication describes packer devices that are set by radially expanding an outer expansion mandrel in response to fluid pressure from the flowbore. U.S. Patent Publication No. U.S. 2005/0028989 A1 is owned by the assignee of the present invention and is hereby incorporated by reference.
A problem arises when a separate slip mandrel is placed to radially surround the expansion mandrel. A slip mandrel is generally a unitary tubular component having a substantially smooth radially inner surface and an outer radial surface with engagement wickers integrally formed thereupon. The addition of this unitary component will substantially increase the setting force required to expand the expansion mandrel and urge the wickers into biting engagement with the surrounding tubular.
Placing axial slots in the slip mandrel to make it easier to expand is problematic. Slotting the slip mandrel will necessarily weaken it and possibly render it vulnerable to rupturing during expansion of the expansion mandrel.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,378,606 issued to Swor et al. shows a barrel slip body having axial slots that divide the slip body into a series of separate barrel slip anchors. The slots extend along almost the entire length of the barrel slip body. During setting, wedge cones are axially moved to cam the slip portions of the barrel slip radially outwardly and into a set position. During axial setting, the slip portions move outwardly substantially uniformly along their lengths.
The type of barrel slip described in the Swor patent would be unsuitable for use with a radially expandable packer that uses a radially expandable expansion mandrel to urge the slip mandrel into setting. The forces involved in setting the slip wickers are substantially different with the radially expandable packer than with an axially set one. With the radially expandable packer, the expansion mandrel expands radially outwardly in a manner that is substantially uniform along the axial length of the slip mandrel. However, there may be portions at the axial ends and in the axial center of the expansion mandrel that are intended to expand to a greater degree than the other portions of the expansion mandrel. Thus, a more suitable slip mandrel design is needed for use with radially expandable packer devices.
The present invention addresses the problems of the prior art.
The invention provides an improved packer device and slip mandrel design that is particularly well suited for use where the packer device has an expansion mandrel that is expanded radially to set the slip mandrel. The exemplary slip mandrel includes a generally tubular mandrel body with an inner radial surface that is shaped and sized to adjoin the outer surface of an expansion mandrel. The outer radial surface of the slip mandrel presents a number of hardened wickers that are shaped and sized to create a biting engagement with a surrounding tubular.
In accordance with the present invention, the slip mandrel body contains a number of axial slots about its perimeter in a pattern that is particularly suited to the expandable packer design. In a currently preferred embodiment, this pattern features axial slots that partially divide the slip mandrel body from either axial end with those beginning proximate the central portion of the expansion mandrel having a greater length than those beginning from the opposite end of the slip mandrel. Preferably, there are two lesser-length axial slots located between each pair of longer axial slots.
In a preferred embodiment, an exemplary packer device includes a central packer mandrel and a radially surrounding expansion mandrel. The expansion mandrel carries two external slip mandrels that are located on either axial side of a fluid sealing element. The fluid sealing element is located upon a central portion of the expansion mandrel, which is expected to experience the greatest amount of radial expansion during setting. The packer device may be set using any of a number of known methods for radially expanding the expansion mandrel so that the engagement profiles of the slips are brought into engagement with the surrounding tubular.
For a thorough understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like or similar elements throughout the several figures of the drawings and wherein:
An expansion mandrel 18 radially surrounds the packer mandrel 12. The expansion mandrel 18 may be formed of 4140 steel also, but is typically of a lesser thickness than the central mandrel 12 so that it can be expanded radially outwardly. A hydraulic pressure chamber 20 is defined between the expansion mandrel 18 and the packer mandrel 12. The outer radial surface 22 of the expansion mandrel 18 presents a corrugated portion 24 wherein a series of gentle annular ridges 26 are separated by troughs 28.
Slip mandrels 30, 32 radially surround the expansion mandrel 18. The slip mandrels 30, 32 are located on either axial side of a fluid seal element 34, which also surrounds the expansion mandrel 18. Each of the slip mandrels 30, 32 includes a slip mandrel body 36 having an inboard axial end 35 and an outboard axial end 37, as well as an outer radial surface 39 that presents a series of radially outwardly protruding wickers 38. The “inboard” axial end 35 is the end of the slip mandrel 30 or 32 that lies proximate the central portion 47 of the expansion mandrel 18 and which is expected to undergo the greatest amount of radial expansion during setting. The “outboard” axial end 37, conversely, will lie furthest away from the central portion 47 and proximate the axial end portions 49 of the expansion mandrel 18. There are radial spaces 51 defined between the axial end portions 39 of the slip mandrels 30, 32 and the axial end portions 49 of the expansion mandrel 18. Additionally, the central portion 47 of the expansion mandrel 18 has a lesser thickness than the axial end portions 49 of the expansion mandrel 18. It is noted that, while essentially the entire expansion mandrel 18 will expand radially during setting, there is some non-uniform expansion due to the presence of the radial spaces 51 and the thinner central portion 47. During expansion, the axial end portions 49 of the expansion mandrel 18 will expand outwardly to a greater degree to fill the radial spaces 51. This additional expansion is desirable as it helps to further axially lock the slip mandrels 30, 32 into position upon the body of the expansion mandrel 18. The thinner central portion 47 will also tend to expand outwardly to a greater degree than neighboring portions of the expansion mandrel 18.
Each slip mandrel body 36 is, as shown by
The wickers 38 are shaped and sized so as to provide a substantial biting engagement with a surrounding tubular when the expansion mandrel 18 is radially expanded. The radially inner surface 43 of each slip mandrel 30, 32 is corrugated in a similar manner as the corrugated portion 24 of the expansion mandrel 18 so that the slip mandrels 30, 32 will seat upon the expansion mandrel 18 in a complimentary manner.
Also surrounding the expansion mandrel 18 are annular retaining rings 44, 46, which are preferably located adjacent the fluid sealing element 34. Additionally, a plurality of retainer segments 48 underlie the retaining rings 44, 46. It is noted that, in
The slip mandrels 30, 32 are secured in place upon the outer surface 22 of the expansion mandrel 18 by affixing securing screws 60 through screw holes 62 in the slip mandrel sections 42 and into the screw holes 50 of the retaining segments 48. The leg 58 of the retaining rings 44, 46 overlie the ledges 54 of the retainer segments 48. A forward edge portion 64 of the slip sections 42 overlies the leg 58 of the retaining rings 44, 46. Thus, when the screws 60 are tightened into place, the forward edge portion 64 tightens down to some degree upon the leg 58 and the ledges 54. The legs 58 of the retaining rings 44, 46 will keep the retainer segments 48 within the trough 28 by preventing them from moving radially outwardly or axially upon the surface 22 of the expansion mandrel 18. As a result, the slip sections 42 and retainer segments 48 are fixedly secured to the expansion mandrel 18. The retaining rings 44, 46 thus serve the function of helping to hold the slip mandrels 30, 32 in place upon the expansion mandrel 18. This securement, together with the use of the complimentary corrugated surfaces, prevents the slip mandrels 30, 32 from moving axially with respect to the expansion mandrel 18 during running in and during the process of setting the packer assembly 10. It is noted that this securement technique does not require the expansion mandrel 18 to be penetrated by a connector, such as a screw, or to have abrupt changes in the geometry of the expansion mandrel 18, either of which might cause the expansion mandrel 18 to fail during setting. In testing, this securement technique has proven to be quite effective in preventing the slip mandrels 30, 32 from becoming unseated during operation.
The fluid sealing element 34 is specially formed to provide a seal that can be energized into sealing engagement with a surrounding wellbore tubular and, at the same time, is resistant to chemicals within the wellbore and extreme temperatures. The fluid sealing element 34, which is best seen in
In operation to set the packer device 10, fluid pressure is increased within the hydraulic pressure chamber 20 of the packer assembly 10. Typically, this is done by increasing fluid pressure from the surface of the well inside the production tubing string within which the packer device 10 is incorporated. If desired for setting, a ball or plug (not shown) may be dropped into the tubing string to land on a ball seat (not shown) below the packer device 10 within the tubing string. Pressure is then built up behind the ball or plug. Increased pressure within the flowbore 14 of the packer assembly 10 is transmitted into the hydraulic pressure chamber 20 to expand the expansion mandrel 18 radially outwardly and cause the wickers 38 of the slip mandrels 30, 32 to be set into a surrounding tubular. As the expansion mandrel 18 expands radially, it causes a widening of the slots 40 and 41. The sharpened edges 56 of the retaining rings 44, 46 are also set into the surrounding tubular in a biting engagement. The terms “outer tubular” and “surrounding tubular” are used herein to designate generally any surrounding cylindrical surface into which the packer device 10 might be set. Ordinarily, the packer device 10 would be set within a string of steel casing lining the interior of a wellbore. However, a suitably sized packer device 10 could also be set within an inner production tubing string or liner. Alternatively, the “surrounding tubular” might be the uncased surface of a section of open hole within a wellbore.
It is noted that the setting technique described generally above is merely one example of a technique for radially expanding the expansion mandrel 18 into a set position. In fact, any of a number of known methods could be used to cause the expansion mandrel 18 to be radially expanded. For example, a striker module, power charge, or force intensifier, devices of known construction and operation, which are run into the flowbore 16 of the packer device 10 might be used. Numerous setting techniques are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. U.S. 2005/0028989, which is owned by the assignee of the present invention and is herein incorporated by reference.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the exemplary designs and embodiments described herein and that the invention is limited only by the claims that follow and any equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/117,521 filed on Apr. 5, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2373005 | Baker | Apr 1945 | A |
3298440 | Current | Jan 1967 | A |
3318385 | Conrad | May 1967 | A |
5944102 | Kilgore et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6056052 | Mullen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6378606 | Swor et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6446717 | White et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6481497 | Swor et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6513600 | Ross | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6536520 | Snider et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
7051805 | Doane et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20030042028 | Lauritzen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030205386 | Johnston et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213601 | Schwendemann et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040016545 | Baugh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040256098 | Ducasse et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028989 | Doane et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050034876 | Doane et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050189120 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10117521 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 11118060 | US |