Brushless permanent-magnet (PM) motors and generators are commonly used small devices and/or devices that operate at high-speed. They are less commonly utilized in slow speed applications due to the assembly difficulties associated with maneuvering a large magnet and because of the difficulty of eliminating enough cogging torque for slow-speed applications.
An example of a slow-speed application that has rarely used a brushless PM generator is wind power. Slow-speed operation often utilizes a gearbox to turn the generator at a higher speed. In addition to efficiency losses, the gearbox necessitates a larger structure to support the additional weight of the gearbox/generator assembly. Thus, there is a need in the art for a generator that includes a permanent magnet, and reduces cogging torque for use in slow-speed applications.
This present disclosure relates to a slow-speed, large-scale generator and assembly procedure for that generator. The magnet is partitioned and assembled piece-by-piece after the rotor and stator have been attached. Guides are used to arrange the magnets so as to give skew to the overall magnet assembly. The shoes of the teeth of the stator have subteeth.
The direct drive generator makes manufacturing easier and has reduced cogging torque, to facilitate large-scale, slow-speed operation. The efficiency and thus reduced weight of the direct-drive improves the packagability of the generator, since the generator can be smaller in size, easier to construct and have fewer components.
The above, as well as other advantages of the present disclosure will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description when considered in the light of the accompanying drawings in which:
When a permanent magnet rotor turns in an airgap a cogging torque is generated due to variations in the air gap 30. This generates a torque due to variation of magnetic reluctance which causes a cogging of the shaft torque. The major variation in airgap 30 is due to the slot opening 31 between the teeth 32 so that the winding may be put around the teeth. The cogging torque can be reduced by skewing the poles of the magnet. However, to reduce the cogging torque to acceptable levels by skewing alone the amount of skew may be so great the BEMF of the motor may be reduced or the wave shape of the BEMF of the motor may be compromised thus reducing the performance of the motor.
The effect of cogging torque can also be reduced by introducing deliberate variations in the airgap 30 of the motor which generate a reluctance torque which is opposite of the reluctance torque generated by the slot opening 31.
Introducing a particular ratio into the lamination can assist in providing deliberate variations in the airgap 30. For example, where the number of stator teeth is 1.5 times the number of rotor poles, such as 144 stator teeth and 96 magnetic poles on the rotor, this will provide variation in the airgap. The cogging due to the slot opening 31 can also be reduced by making the center protrusion 35 the same width as the slot opening 31. The notches 33 on either side of the center protrusion 35 would have a width of half the distance from the edge of the center protrusion 35 to the edge of the slot opening 31. The protrusions next to the slot opening 37 would have a width the same as the width of the notches 33.
As the rotor 10 is turned, while one pole of the magnet is seeing the slot opening 31 another magnetic pole of the rotor 10 is seeing the protrusion 35 in the center of another tooth 32. When the first magnetic pole on the rotor is transitioning from the slot opening 31 to the tooth 32, another magnetic pole on the rotor 10 is transitioning from a protrusion on the center of the tooth 35 to the notch 33 on the tooth 32. Every time a magnetic pole of the rotor is transitioning from a larger airgap to a smaller airgap another pole of the motor is transitioning from a smaller airgap to a larger airgap. While each magnetic pole of the rotor is producing cogging due to the variation of the reluctance of the airgap, half the magnetic poles are producing a torque in one direction while the other half of the magnetic rotor poles are producing a cogging torque in the opposite direction. The net result is a cancellation of the cogging torque.
Alternatively, the rotor magnetic pole can also be skewed for additional reduction of cogging. There are at least two ways to skew the magnetic pole. One way, as shown in
The skew of the magnets 36 from the holes 42 reduces the cogging torque and improves the wave shape of the voltage by reducing harmonic content.
The magnets 36 are arranged in a N-S-N-S pattern along the circumferential direction of the hub and three magnets of like polarity are arranged lengthwise on the hub. Lengthwise is shown in
Ninety-six magnet-hub assemblies 14 are attached to rotor 10 with bolts using the holes 42 shown in the sheet in
Twenty-four magnet-hub assemblies 14 are first bolted to the rotor 10 in a circumferential direction using the first two rows of holes 42. Then twenty-four magnet-hub assemblies 14 are bolted to the rotor 10 in the circumferential direction using the next two rows of holes 42. The second row of holes 42 are staggered from the first set of holes 42 by 0.15625 radial degrees, or approximately 2.05 mm. Third and fourth sets of holes 42 are likewise staggered by the distance.
When the rotor 10 is finished along the lengthwise direction there are three magnets of the same polarity directly in line, and three more magnets directly in line with each other but staggered by approximately 2.05 mm from the first set of the magnets, with three more magnets in line with each other but staggered 4.1 mm from the second set of magnets and then three more magnets in line with each other but staggered 4.1 mm from the third set of magnets. This produces a staggered skew of the rotor magnets 36.
The magnet assemblies 14 are assembled by gluing or otherwise fixing the magnets 36 to the curved plate 38 (
The stator mount 22 has the lamination stacks 24 built around and affixed to it. The bearings 26 are also attached to the stator mount 22 by the inner rings 52, one bearing near the top 18 and the other near the bottom 28. The rotor 10, without the magnet assemblies, is also attached to the bearings 26.
Each magnet assembly 14 is attached to the rotor mount 12 individually. First, a curved Teflon or similar nonmagnetic material plate 38 is slid into the air gap 30, and two guide poles 54 are placed on either side of the location where the magnet assembly 14 will be placed. Next, the magnet assembly 14 is lowered to the bottom of the gap 30 created between the rotor mount 12, Teflon plate 38, and guide poles 54, all of which collectively hold the magnet assembly's radial and circumferential positions (see
Finally, the top flange 16 is fixed to the rotor mount 12.
In operation, a slow-speed torque input (such as that provided by a windmill 44) is applied to the rotor 10 via the top flange 16. There does not need to be a change in gear ratio between a slow-speed input and the generator. The rotor rotates about the stator 20 on the bearings 26, and the motion of the magnets 36 passing the coiled lamination stack 24 produces electrical current in the coiled wires. The skew of the magnet alignment relative to the stator teeth reduces the cogging torque, as do the subteeth on the stator teeth.
The present generator has been described in an illustrative manner. It is understood that the terminology which has been used is intended to be in the nature of words of description, rather than of limitation. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings. Therefore it should be noted that the generator can be practiced otherwise than as specifically illustrated and described without departing from its spirit or scope.
The present application is a divisional of prior application Ser. No. 11/779,825 titled Slow-Speed Direct-Drive Generator filed on Jul. 18, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application No. 60/831,510 filed Jul. 18, 2006, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60831510 | Jul 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11779825 | Jul 2007 | US |
Child | 12817018 | US |