Slurries and methods of making light weight gypsum board

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8257489
  • Patent Number
    8,257,489
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 19, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 4, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
The invention generally provides gypsum-containing slurries including stucco, naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, and pregelatinized starch. The naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is present in an amount of about 0.1%-3.0% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco. The pregelatinized starch is present in an amount of at least about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight of pregelatinized starch by weight based on the weight of dry stucco in the formulation. Other slurry additives can include trimetaphosphate salts, accelerators, binders, paper fiber, glass fiber, and other known ingredients.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention pertains to a method making gypsum slurries containing a pregelatinized starch and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, and products made therefrom. It also pertains to a method of increasing dry strength of gypsum-containing products including wallboard by using a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant in combination with pregelatinized starch in the slurry used to make the products.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Certain properties of gypsum (calcium sulfate dihydrate) make it very popular for use in making industrial and building products, such as gypsum wallboard. Gypsum is a plentiful and generally inexpensive raw material which, through a process of dehydration and rehydration, can be cast, molded or otherwise formed into useful shapes. The base material from which gypsum wallboard and other gypsum products are manufactured is the hemihydrate form of calcium sulfate (CaSO4.½H2O), commonly termed “stucco,” which is produced by heat conversion of the dihydrate form of calcium sulfate (CaSO4.2H2O), from which 1-½ water molecules been removed.


Conventional gypsum-containing products such as gypsum wallboard have many advantages, such as low cost and easy workability, although substantial amounts of gypsum dust can be generated when the products are cut or drilled. Various improvements have been achieved in making gypsum-containing products using starches as ingredients in the slurries used to make such products. Starch can increase flexural strength and compressive strength of gypsum-containing products including gypsum wallboard. Known gypsum wallboard contains board starch at levels of less than about 10 lbs/MSF.


It is also necessary to use substantial amounts of water in gypsum slurries containing pregelatinized starch in order to ensure proper flowability of the slurry. Unfortunately, most of this water must eventually be driven off by heating, which is expensive due to the high cost of the fuels used in the heating process. The heating step is also time-consuming. It has been found that the use of naphthalenesulfonate dispersants can increase the fluidity of the slurries, thus overcoming the water demand problem. In addition, it has also been found that the naphthalenesulfonate dispersants, if the usage level is high enough, can cross-link to the pregelatinized starch to bind the gypsum crystals after drying, thus increasing dry strength of the gypsum composite. Trimetaphosphate salts have not in the past been recognized to affect gypsum slurry water requirements. However, the present inventors have discovered that increasing the level of the trimetaphosphate salt to hitherto unknown levels in the presence of a specific dispersant makes it possible to achieve proper slurry flowability with unexpectedly reduced amounts of water, even in the presence of high starch levels. This, of course, is highly desirable because it in turn reduces fuel usage as well as the process time associated with subsequent water removal process steps. Thus the present inventors have also discovered that the dry strength of gypsum board can be increased by using a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant in combination with pregelatinized starch in the slurry used to make the wallboard.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention generally comprises a slurry including stucco, naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, and pregelatinized starch. The naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is present in an amount of about 0.1%-3.0% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco. The pregelatinized starch is present in an amount of at least about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco in the formulation. Other slurry additives can include accelerators, binders, paper or glass fibers and other known constituents. The invention also comprises the gypsum-containing products made with such slurries.


The invention also comprises a slurry including stucco, trimetaphosphate salt, naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, and pregelatinized starch. The sodium trimetaphosphate is present in an amount of at least about 0.12% by weight based on the weight of stucco. In a preferred embodiment, the trimetaphosphate salt is present in an amount of about 0.12-0.4% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco. The naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is


present in an amount of about 0.1%-3.0% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco. The pregelatinized starch is present in an amount of at least about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco in the formulation. Other slurry additives can include accelerators, binders, paper or glass fibers and other known constituents. The invention also comprises the gypsum-containing products made with such slurries.


A preferred gypsum-containing product is gypsum wallboard. In this embodiment, the invention constitutes gypsum wallboard comprising a set gypsum composition formed between two substantially parallel cover sheets, the set gypsum composition made using the gypsum-containing slurry of water, stucco, pregelatinized starch, and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant. The gypsum-containing slurry can optionally contain a trimetaphosphate salt, for example, sodium trimetaphosphate. This gypsum wallboard made in accordance with the invention has a high strength, yet much lower weight than conventional boards. In addition, much less dust is generated on cutting, sawing, snapping, or drilling the wallboards made according to this embodiment.


In another embodiment the invention constitutes a method of making gypsum wallboard by mixing a gypsum-containing slurry comprising water, stucco, pregelatinized starch, and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, wherein the pregelatinized starch is present in an amount of at least about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight based on the weight of stucco. The resulting gypsum-containing slurry is deposited on a first paper cover sheet, and a second paper cover sheet is placed over the deposited slurry to form a gypsum wallboard. The gypsum wallboard is cut after the gypsum-containing slurry has hardened sufficiently for cutting, and the resulting gypsum wallboard is dried. The gypsum-containing slurry can optionally contain a trimetaphosphate salt, for example, sodium trimetaphosphate. Other conventional ingredients will also be used in the slurry including, as appropriate, accelerators, binders, paper fiber, glass fiber, and other known ingredients. A soap foam is normally added to reduce the density of the final gypsum wallboard product.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to one embodiment of the present invention, there are provided finished gypsum-containing products made from gypsum-containing slurries containing stucco, pregelatinized starch, and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant. The naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is present in an amount of about 0.1%-3.0% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco. The pregelatinized starch is present in an amount of at least about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco in the formulation. Other ingredients that may be used in the slurry include binders, paper fiber, glass fiber, and accelerators. A soap foam is normally added to the newly formulated gypsum-containing slurries to reduce the density of the final gypsum-containing product, for example, gypsum wallboard.


Optionally, the combination of from about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight pregelatinized starch, from about 0.1% by weight up to about 3.0% by weight naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, and a minimum of at least about 0.12% by weight up to about 0.4% by weight of trimetaphosphate salt (all based on the weight of dry stucco used in the gypsum slurry) unexpectedly and significantly increases the fluidity of the gypsum slurry. This substantially reduces the amount of water required to produce a gypsum slurry with sufficient flowability to be used in making gypsum-containing products such as gypsum wallboard. The level of trimetaphosphate salt, which is at least about twice that of standard formulations (as sodium trimetaphosphate), is believed to boost the dispersant activity of the naphthalenesulfonate dispersant.


The naphthalenesulfonate dispersants used in the present invention include polynaphthalenesulfonic acid and its salts (polynaphthalenesulfonates) and derivatives, which are condensation products of naphthalenesulfonic acids and formaldehyde. Particularly desirable polynaphthalenesulfonates include sodium and calcium naphthalenesulfonate. The average molecular weight of the naphthalenesulfonates can range from about 3,000 to 27,000, although it is preferred that the molecular weight be about 8,000 to 10,000. At a given solid % aqueous solution, a higher molecular weight dispersant has higher viscosity, and generates a higher water demand in the formulation, than a lower molecular weight dispersant. Useful naphthalenesulfonates include DILOFLO, available from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Cleveland, Ohio; DAXAD, available from Hampshire Chemical Corp., Lexington, Mass.; and LOMAR D, available from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Lafayette, Ind. The naphthalenesulfonates are preferably used as aqueous solutions in the range 35-55% by weight solids content, for example. It is most preferred to use the naphthalenesulfonates in the form of an aqueous solution, for example, in the range of about 40-45% by weight solids content. Alternatively, where appropriate, the naphthalenesulfonates can be used in dry solid or powder form, such as LOMAR D, for example.


The polynaphthalenesulfonates useful in the present invention have the general structure (I):




embedded image



wherein n is >2, and wherein M is sodium, potassium, calcium, and the like.


The naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, preferably as an about 45% by weight solution in water, may be used in a range of from about 0.5% to about 3.0% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco used in the gypsum composite formulation. A more preferred range of naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is from about 0.5% to about 2.0% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco, and a most preferred range from about 0.7% to about 2.0% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco. In contrast, known gypsum wallboard contains this dispersant at levels of about 0.4% by weight, or less, based on the weight of dry stucco.


Stated in an another way, the naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, on a dry weight basis, may be used in a range from about 0.1% to about 1.5% by weight based of the weight of dry stucco used in the gypsum composite formulation. A more preferred range of naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, on a dry solids basis, is from about 0.25% to about 0.7% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco, and a most preferred range (on a dry solids basis) from about 0.3% to about 0.7% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco.


The gypsum-containing slurry can optionally contain a trimetaphosphate salt, for example, sodium trimetaphosphate. Any suitable water-soluble metaphosphate or polyphosphate can be used in accordance with the present invention. It is preferred that a trimetaphosphate salt be used, including double salts, that is trimetaphosphate salts having two cations. Particularly useful trimetaphosphate salts include sodium trimetaphosphate, potassium trimetaphosphate, calcium trimetaphosphate, sodium calcium trimetaphosphate, lithium trimetaphosphate, ammonium trimetaphosphate, and the like, or combinations thereof. A preferred trimetaphosphate salt is sodium trimetaphosphate. It is preferred to use the trimetaphosphate salt as an aqueous solution, for example, in the range of about 10-15% by weight solids content. Other cyclic or acyclic polyphosphates can also be used, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,825 to Yu et al., herein incorporated by reference.


Sodium trimetaphosphate is a known additive in gypsum-containing compositions, although it is generally used in a range of from about 0.05% to about 0.08% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco used in the gypsum slurry. In the embodiments of the present invention, sodium trimetaphosphate (or other water-soluble metaphosphate or polyphosphate) can be present in the range of from about 0.12% to about 0.4% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco used in the gypsum composite formulation. A preferred range of sodium trimetaphosphate (or other water-soluble metaphosphate or polyphosphate) is from about 0.12% to about 0.3% by weight based on the weight of dry stucco used in the gypsum composite formulation.


There are two forms of stucco, alpha and beta. These two types of stucco are produced by different means of calcination. In the present inventions either the beta or the alpha form of stucco may be used.


Starches, including pregelatinized starch in particular, must be used in gypsum-containing slurries prepared in accordance with the present invention. A preferred pregelatinized starch is pregelatinized corn starch, for example pregelatinized corn flour available from Bunge Milling, St. Louis, Mo., having the following typical analysis: moisture 7.5%, protein 8.0%, oil 0.5%, crude fiber 0.5%, ash 0.3%; having a green strength of 0.48 psi; and having a loose bulk density of 35.0 lb/ft3. Pregelatinized corn starch should be used in an amount of at least about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight, based on the weight of dry stucco used in the gypsum-containing slurry.


The present inventors have further discovered that an unexpected increase in dry strength (particularly in wallboard) can be obtained by using at least about 0.5% by weight up to about 10% by weight pregelatinized starch (preferably pregelatinized corn starch) in the presence of about 0.1% by weight to 3.0% by weight naphthalenesulfonate dispersant (starch and naphthalenesulfonate levels based on the weight of dry stucco present in the formulation). This unexpected result can be obtained whether or not water-soluble metaphosphate or polyphosphate is present.


In addition, it has unexpectedly been found that pregelatinized starch can be used at levels of at least about 10 lb/MSF, or more, in the dried gypsum wallboard made in accordance with the present invention, yet high strength and low weight can be achieved. Levels as high as 35-45 lb/MSF pregelatinized starch in the gypsum wallboard have been shown to be effective. As an example, Formulation B, as shown in Tables 1 and 2 below, includes 45 lb/MSF, yet produced a board weight of 1042 lb/MSF having excellent strength. In this example (Formulation B), a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant as a 45% by weight solution in water, was used at a level of 1.28% by weight.


Other useful starches include acid-modified starches, such as acid-modified corn flour, available as HI-BOND from Bunge Milling, St. Louis, Mo. This starch has the following typical analysis: moisture 10.0%, oil 1.4%, solubles 17.0%, alkaline fluidity 98.0%, loose bulk density 30 lb/ft3, and a 20% slurry producing a pH of 4.3. Another useful starch is non-pregelatinized wheat starch, such as ECOSOL-45, available from ADM/Ogilvie, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.


A further unexpected result may be achieved with the present invention when the naphthalenesulfonate dispersant trimetaphosphate salt combination is combined with pregelatinized corn starch, and optionally, paper fiber or glass fiber. Gypsum wallboard made from formulations containing these three ingredients have increased strength and reduced weight, and are more economically desirable due to the reduced water requirements in their manufacture.


Accelerators can be used in the gypsum-containing compositions of the present invention, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,409,825 to Yu et al., herein incorporated by reference. One desirable heat resistant accelerator (HRA) can be made from the dry grinding of landplaster (calcium sulfate dihydrate). Small amounts of additives (normally about 5% by weight) such as sugar, dextrose, boric acid, and starch can be used to make this HRA. Sugar, or dextrose, is currently preferred. Another useful accelerator is “climate stabilized accelerator” or “climate stable accelerator,” (CSA) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,573,947, herein incorporated by reference.


The following examples further illustrate the invention. They should not be construed as in any way limiting the scope of the invention.


EXAMPLE 1
Sample Gypsum Slurry Formulations

Gypsum slurry formulations are shown in Table 1 below. All values in Table 1 are expressed as weight percent based on the weight of dry stucco. Values in parentheses are dry weight in pounds (lb/MSF).













TABLE 1







Component
Formulation A
Formulation B









Stucco (lb/MSF)
(732)
(704)



sodium
0.20 (1.50)
0.30 (2.14)



trimetaphosphate



Dispersant
0.18 (1.35)
0.581 (4.05)



(naphthalenesulfonate)



Pregelatinized starch
2.7 (20) 
6.4 (45) 



Board starch
0.41 (3.0) 
 0



Heat resistant
 (15)
 (15)



accelerator (HRA)



Glass fiber
0.27 (2.0) 
0.28 (2.0) 



Paper fiber
 0
0.99 (7.0) 



Soap*
 0.03 (0.192)
 0.03 (0.192)



Total Water (lb.)
805
852



Water/Stucco ratio
   1.10
   1.21







*Used to pregenerate foam.




11.28% by weight as a 45% aqueous solution.







EXAMPLE 2
Preparation of Wallboards

Sample gypsum wallboards were prepared in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 6,342,284 to Yu et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,550 to Yu et al., herein incorporated by reference. This includes the separate generation of foam and introduction of the foam into the slurry of the other ingredients as described in Example 5 of these patents.


Test results for gypsum wallboards made using the Formulations A and B of Example 1, and a control are shown in Table 2 below. As in this example and other examples below, nail pull resistance, core hardness, and flexural strength tests were performed according to ASTM C-473. Additionally, it is noted that typical gypsum wallboard is approximately ½ inch thick and has a weight of between about 1600 to 1800 pounds per 1,000 square feet of material, or lb/MSF. (“MSF” is a standard abbreviation in the art for a thousand square feet; it is an area measurement for boxes, corrugated media and wallboard.)












TABLE 2







Formulation
Formulation


Lab test result
Control Board
A Board
B Board


















Board weight (lb/MSF)
1587
1066
1042


Nail pull resistance (lb)
81.7
50.2
72.8


Core hardness (lb)
16.3
5.2
11.6


Humidified bond load
17.3
20.3
15.1


(lb)


Humidified bond
0.6
5
11.1


failure (%)


Flexural strength, face-
47
47.2
52.6


up (MD) (lb)


Flexural strength, face-
51.5
66.7
78.8


down (MD) (lb)


Flexural strength, face-
150
135.9
173.1


up (XMD) (lb)


Flexural strength, face-
144.4
125.5
165.4


down (XMD) (lb)





MD: machine direction


XMD: across machine direction






As illustrated in Table 2, gypsum wallboards prepared using the Formulation A and B slurries have significant reductions in weight compared to the control board. With reference again to Table 1, the comparisons of the Formulation A board to the Formulation B board are most striking The water/stucco (w/s) ratios are similar in Formulation A and Formulation B. A significantly higher level of naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is also used in Formulation B. Also, in Formulation B substantially more pregelatinized starch was used, about 6% by weight, a greater than 100% increase over Formulation A accompanied by marked strength increases. Even so, the water demand to produce the required flowability remained low in the Formulation B slurry, the difference being about 10% in comparison to Formulation A. The low water demand in both Formulations is attributed to the synergistic effect of the combination of naphthalenesulfonate dispersant and sodium trimetaphosphate in the gypsum slurry, which increases the fluidity of the gypsum slurry, even in the presence of a substantially higher level of pregelatinized starch.


As illustrated in Table 2, the wallboard prepared using the Formulation B slurry has substantially increased strength compared with the wallboard prepared using the Formulation A slurry. By incorporating increased amounts of pregelatinized starch in combination with increased amounts of naphthalenesulfonate dispersant and sodium trimetaphosphate, nail pull resistance in the Formulation B board improved by 45% over the Formulation A board. Substantial increases in flexural strength were also observed in the Formulation B board as compared to the Formulation A board.


EXAMPLE 3

½ Inch Gypsum Wallboard Weight Reduction Trials


Further gypsum wallboard examples (Boards C, D and E), including slurry formulations and test results are shown in Table 3 below. The slurry formulations of Table 3 include the major components of the slurries. Values in parentheses are expressed as weight percent based on the weight of dry stucco.














TABLE 3







Control
Formulation
Formulation
Formulation



Board
C Board
D Board
E Board




















Trial formulation






component/parameter


Dry stucco (lb/MSF)
1300
1281
1196
1070


Accelerator (lb/MSF)
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2


DILOFLO1 (lb/MSF)
4.1 (0.32%)
8.1 (0.63%)
8.1 (0.68%)
8.1 (0.76%)


Regular starch (lb/MSF)
5.6 (0.43%)
0
0
0


Pregelatinized
0
 10 (0.78%)
 10 (0.84%)
 10 (0.93%)


corn starch (lb/MSF)


Sodium
0.7 (0.05%)
1.6 (0.12%)
1.6 (0.13%)
1.6 (0.15%)


trimetaphosphate (lb/MSF)


Total water/stucco ratio (w/s)
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.84


Trial formulation


test results


Dry board weight
1611
1570
1451
1320


(lb/MSF)


Nail pull resistance (lb)
77.3
85.5
77.2
65.2






ASTM standard: 77 lb




1DILOFLO is a 45% Naphthalensulfonate solution in water







As illustrated in Table 3, Boards C, D, and E were made from a slurry having substantially increased amounts of starch, DILOFLO dispersant, and sodium trimetaphosphate in comparison with the control board (about a two-fold increase on a percentage basis for the starch and dispersant, and a two- to three-fold increase for the trimetaphosphate), while maintaining the w/s ratio constant. Nevertheless, strength as measured by nail pull resistance was not dramatically affected and board weight was significantly reduced. Therefore, in this example of an embodiment of the invention, the new formulation (such as, for example, Board D) can provide increased starch formulated in a usable, flowable slurry, while maintaining adequate strength.


EXAMPLE 4

Wet Gypsum Cube Strength Test


The wet cube strength tests were carried out by using Southard CKS board stucco, available from United States Gypsum Corp., Chicago, Ill. and tap water in the laboratory to determine their wet compressive strength. The following lab test procedure was used.


Stucco (1000 g), CSA (2 g), and tap water (1200 cc) at about 70° F. were used for each wet gypsum cube cast. Pregelatinized corn starch (20 g, 2.0% based on stucco wt.) and CSA (2 g, 0.2% based on stucco wt.) were thoroughly dry mixed first in a plastic bag with the stucco prior to mixing with a tap water solution containing both naphthalenesulfonate dispersant and sodium trimetaphosphate. The dispersant used was DILOFLO dispersant (1.0-2.0%, as indicated in Table 4). Varying amounts of sodium trimetaphosphate were used also as indicated in Table 4.


The dry ingredients and aqueous solution were initially combined in a laboratory Warning blender, the mixture produced allowed to soak for 10 sec, and then the mixture was mixed at low speed for 10 sec in order to make the slurry. The slurries thus formed were cast into three 2″×2″×2″ cube molds. The cast cubes were then removed from the molds, weighed, and sealed inside plastic bags to prevent moisture loss before the compressive strength test was performed. The compressive strength of the wet cubes was measured using an ATS machine and recorded as an average in pounds per square inch (psi). The results obtained were as follows:













TABLE 4






Sodium
DILOFLO1
Wet cube



Test
trimetaphosphate,
(wt %
weight
Wet cube


Sample
grams (wt % based
based on
(2″ × 2″ ×
compressive


No.
on dry stucco)
dry stucco)
2″), g
strength, psi



















1
0
1.5
183.57
321


2
0.5 (0.05) 
1.5
183.11
357


3
1 (0.1)
1.5
183.19
360


4
2 (0.2)
1.5
183.51
361


5
4 (0.4)
1.5
183.65
381


6
10 (1.0) 
1.5
183.47
369


7
0
1.0
184.02
345


8
0.5 (0.05) 
1.0
183.66
349


9
1 (0.1)
1.0
183.93
356


10
2 (0.2)
1.0
182.67
366


11
4 (0.4)
1.0
183.53
365


12
10 (1.0) 
1.0
183.48
341


13
0
2.0
183.33
345


14
0.5 (0.05) 
2.0
184.06
356


15
1 (0.1)
2.0
184.3
363


16
2 (0.2)
2.0
184.02
363


17
4 (0.4)
2.0
183.5
368


18
10 (1.0) 
2.0
182.68
339






1DILOFLO is a 45% Naphthalensulfonate solution in water







As illustrated in Table 4, Samples 4-5, 10-11, and 17, having levels of sodium trimetaphosphate in the about 0.12-0.4% range of the present invention generally provided superior wet cube compressive strength as compared to samples with sodium trimetaphosphate outside this range.


EXAMPLE 5

½ Inch Light Weight Gypsum Wallboard Plant Production Trials


Further trials were performed (Trial Boards 1 and 2), including slurry formulations and test results are shown in Table 5 below. The slurry formulations of Table 5 include the major components of the slurries. Values in parentheses are expressed as weight percent based on the weight of dry stucco.














TABLE 5








Plant

Plant



Control
Formulation
Control
Formulation



Board 1
Trial Board 1
Board 2
Trial Board 2




















Trial formulation






component/parameter


Dry stucco (lb/MSF)
1308
1160
1212
1120


DILOFLO1 (lb/MSF)
5.98 (0.457%)
7.98 (0.688%)
7.18 (0.592%)
8.99 (0.803%)


Regular starch (lb/MSF)
5.0 (0.38%)
0
4.6 (0.38%)
0


Pregelatinized corn starch
2.0 (0.15%)
 10 (0.86%)
2.5 (0.21%)
9.0 (0.80%)


(lb/MSF)


Sodium trimetaphosphate
0.7 (0.05%)
2.0 (0.17%)
0.6 (0.05%)
1.6 (0.14%)


(lb/MSF)


Total water/stucco ratio
0.79
0.77
0.86
0.84


(w/s)


Trial formulation


test results


Dry board weight
1619
1456
1553
1443


(lb/MSF)


Nail pull resistance (lb)
81.5
82.4
80.7
80.4


Flexural strength,
41.7
43.7
44.8
46.9


average (MD) (lb)


Flexural strength,
134.1
135.5
146
137.2


average (XMD) (lb)


Humidified bond2 load,
19.2
17.7
20.9
19.1


average (lb)


Humidified bond2,3
1.6
0.1
0.5
0


failure (%)






ASTM standard: 77 lb



MD: machine direction


XMD: across machine direction



1DILOFLO is a 45% Naphthalensulfonate solution in water




290° F./90% Relative Humidity




3It is well understood that under these test conditions, percentage failure rates <50% are acceptable.







As illustrated in Table 5, Trial Boards 1 and 2 were made from a slurry having substantially increased amounts of starch, DILOFLO dispersant, and sodium trimetaphosphate, while slightly decreasing the w/s ratio, in comparison with the control boards. Nevertheless, strength as measured by nail pull resistance and flexural testing was maintained or improved, and board weight was significantly reduced. Therefore, in this example of an embodiment of the invention, the new formulation (such as, for example, Trial Boards 1 and 2) can provide increased trimetaphosphate and starch formulated in a usable, flowable slurry, while maintaining adequate strength.


EXAMPLE 6

½ Inch Ultra-Light Weight Gypsum Wallboard Plant Production Trials


Further trials were performed (Trial Boards 3 and 4) using Formulation B (Example 1) as in Example 2, except that the pregelatinized corn starch was prepared with water at 10% concentration (wet starch preparation) and a blend of HYONIC PFM soaps (available from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Lafayette, Ind.) was used. For example, Trial Board 3 was prepared with a blend of HYONIC PFM 10/HYONIC PFM 33 ranging from 65-70% by weight/35-30% by weight. For example, Trial Board 4 was prepared with a 70/30 wt./wt. blend of HYONIC PFM 10/HYONIC PFM 33. The trial results are shown in Table 6 below.











TABLE 6






Trial Board 3
Trial Board 4



(Formulation B plus
(Formulation B plus



HYONIC soap blend
HYONIC soap blend



65/35)
70/30)


Lab test result
(n = 12)
(n = 34)*

















Board weight (lb/MSF)
1106
1013


Nail pull resistancea (lb)
85.5
80.3


Core hardnessb (lb)
>15
12.4


Flexural strength,
55.6
60.31


averagec (MD) (lb)


Flexural strength,
140.1
142.31


averaged (XMD) (lb)





*Except as marked.



1n = 4



MD: machine direction


XMD: across machine direction



aASTM standard: 77 lb




bASTM standard: 11 lb




cASTM standard: 36 lb




dASTM standard: 107 lb







As illustrated in Table 6, strength characteristics as measured by nail pull and core hardness were above the ASTM standard. Flexural strength was also measured to be above the ASTM standard. Again, in this example of an embodiment of the invention, the new formulation (such as, for example, Trial Boards 3 and 4) can provide increased trimetaphosphate and starch formulated in a usable, flowable slurry, while maintaining adequate strength.


The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.


Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. It should be understood that the illustrated embodiments are exemplary only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A slurry comprising water, stucco, pregelatinized starch, and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant; the pregelatinized starch is present in an amount from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight based on the weight of the stucco, and the naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is present in an amount from about 0.2% to about 3.0% by weight based on the weight of the stucco;when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a density of about 34 pcf or less; andwhen the slurry is cast and dried as said board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance of at least about 65 lb, an average core hardness of at least about 11 lb, and an average flexural strength of at least about 36 lb in a machine direction and/or about 107 lb in a cross-machine direction, the nail pull resistance, the core hardness and the flexural strength as determined in accordance with ASTM C473.
  • 2. The slurry of claim 1, wherein the naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is present in an amount from about 0.25% to about 3.0% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 3. The slurry of claim 1, wherein the pregelatinized starch is present in an amount from about 0.5% to about 3% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 4. The slurry of claim 1, wherein the slurry is further formed from a water soluble polyphosphate present in an amount from about 0.12% to about 0.4% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 5. The slurry of claim 1, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a dry weight from about 1000 lb/MSF to about 1400 lb/MSF.
  • 6. The slurry of claim 1, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a density from about 24 pcf to about 34 pcf.
  • 7. The slurry of claim 6, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance of at least about 77 lb.
  • 8. The slurry of claim 6, the slurry having a wet compressive strength of at least about 340 psi when the slurry is cast as a two-inch cube.
  • 9. The slurry of claim 6, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance to core hardness ratio from about 4 to about 8.
  • 10. The slurry of claim 6, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a ratio of density (pcf) to core hardness (lb) of less than about 3.2.
  • 11. A slurry comprising water, stucco, starch, and foam; the starch is present in an amount from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight based on the weight of the stucco and effective to increase the average core hardness of the slurry when set as relative to the slurry without the starch when set;when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a density from about 24 pcf to about 34 pcf; andwhen the slurry is cast and dried as said board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has an average core hardness of at least about 11 lb, and at least one of: a nail pull resistance of at least about 65 lb, an average flexural strength of at least about 36 lb in a machine direction, and an average flexural strength of at least about 107 lb in a cross-machine direction, the core hardness, the nail pull resistance, and the flexural strength as determined in accordance with ASTM C473.
  • 12. The slurry of claim 11, wherein the slurry is further formed from naphthalenesulfonate dispersant present in an amount from about 0.1% to about 3.0% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 13. The slurry of claim 11, wherein the starch is a pregelatinized starch and is present in an amount from about 0.5% to about 3% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 14. The slurry of claim 11, wherein the slurry is further formed from a water soluble polyphosphate present in an amount of at least about 0.12% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 15. The slurry of claim 11, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a dry weight from about 1000 lb/MSF to about 1400 lb/MSF.
  • 16. The slurry of claim 11, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance of at least about 77 lb.
  • 17. The slurry of claim 11, wherein the slurry is formed from the water, the stucco, pregelatinized starch, and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, the slurry having a wet compressive strength of at least about 340 psi when the slurry, exclusive of added foam therein, is cast as a two-inch cube.
  • 18. The slurry of claim 11, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance to core hardness ratio from about 4 to about 8.
  • 19. The slurry of claim 11, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a ratio of density (pcf) to core hardness (lb) of less than about 3.2.
  • 20. A method of making a light weight gypsum board, comprising: (a) mixing at least water, stucco, pregelatinized starch, and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant to form a slurry, the pregelatinized starch is present in an amount from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight based on the weight of the stucco, and the naphthalenesulfonate dispersant is present in an amount from about 0.2% to about 3.0% by weight based on the weight of the stucco;(b) disposing the slurry between a first cover sheet and a second cover sheet to form a panel;(c) cutting the panel into a board; and(d) drying the board;such that the dried board has a density of about 34 pcf or less; andwhen the dried board is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance of at least about 65 lb, an average core hardness of at least about 11 lb, and an average flexural strength of at least about 36 lb in a machine direction and/or about 107 lb in a cross-machine direction, the nail pull resistance, the core hardness and the flexural strength as determined in accordance with ASTM C473.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the slurry is further formed from a water soluble polyphosphate present in an amount from about 0.12% to about 0.4% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a dry weight from about 1000 lb/MSF to about 1400 lb/MSF.
  • 23. The method of claim 20, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a density from about 24 pcf to about 34 pcf. Zone Name: C7,AMD,M
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the pregelatinized starch is present in an amount from about 0.5% to about 3% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 25. The method of claim 23, the slurry having a wet compressive strength of at least about 340 psi when the slurry is cast as a two-inch cube.
  • 26. The method of claim 23, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance to core hardness ratio from about 4 to about 8.
  • 27. The method of claim 23, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a ratio of density (pcf) to core hardness (lb) of less than about 3.2.
  • 28. A method of making a light weight gypsum board, comprising: (a) mixing at least water, stucco, starch, and foam to form a slurry, the starch is present in an amount from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight based on the weight of the stucco and effective to increase the average core hardness of the slurry when set as relative to the slurry without the starch when set;(b) disposing the slurry between a first cover sheet and a second cover sheet to form a panel;(c) cutting the panel into a board; and(d) drying the board;such that the dried board has a density from about 24 pcf to about 34 pcf; andwhen the dried board is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has an average core hardness of at least about 11 lb, and at least one of: a nail pull resistance of at least about 65 lb, an average flexural strength of at least about 36 lb in a machine direction, and an average flexural strength of at least about 107 lb in a cross-machine direction, the core hardness, the nail pull resistance, and the flexural strength as determined in accordance with ASTM C473.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the slurry is further formed from naphthalenesulfonate dispersant present in an amount from about 0.1% to about 3.0% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 30. The method of claim 28, wherein the slurry is further formed from a water soluble polyphosphate present in an amount of at least about 0.12% by weight based on the weight of the stucco.
  • 31. The method of claim 28, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a dry weight from about 1000 lb/MSF to about 1400 lb/MSF.
  • 32. The method of claim 28, wherein the slurry is formed from the water, the stucco, pregelatinized starch, and a naphthalenesulfonate dispersant, the slurry having a wet compressive strength of at least about 340 psi when the slurry, exclusive of added foam therein, is cast as a two-inch cube.
  • 33. The method of claim 28, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board that is about 1/2 inch thick, the board has a nail pull resistance to core hardness ratio from about 4 to about 8.
  • 34. The method of claim 28, wherein when the slurry is cast and dried as board, the board has a ratio of density (pcf) to core hardness (lb) of less than about 3.2.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/449,177, filed Jun. 7, 2006, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/688,839, filed Jun. 9, 2005, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (337)
Number Name Date Kind
1500452 Haggerty Jul 1924 A
1702729 Hite Feb 1929 A
1769519 King Jul 1930 A
1868671 Nelson Jul 1932 A
1937472 Ericson Nov 1933 A
1953589 Camp Apr 1934 A
1971900 Cerveny et al. Aug 1934 A
2078199 King Apr 1937 A
2083961 Gustave Jun 1937 A
2207339 Camp Jul 1940 A
2213603 Young et al. Sep 1940 A
2322194 King Jun 1943 A
2340535 Jenkins Feb 1944 A
2342574 Denning Feb 1944 A
2388543 Hoggatt Nov 1945 A
2516632 Kesler et al. Jun 1950 A
2526066 Croce Oct 1950 A
2698818 Staerkle et al. Jan 1955 A
2733238 Kerr et al. Jan 1956 A
2744022 Croce May 1956 A
2803575 Riddell et al. Aug 1957 A
2845417 Kesler et al. Jul 1958 A
2853394 Riddell et al. Sep 1958 A
2871146 Etheridge Jan 1959 A
2884413 Kerr et al. Apr 1959 A
3179529 Hikey et al. Apr 1965 A
3260027 Page et al. Jul 1966 A
3359146 Lane et al. Dec 1967 A
3382636 Green May 1968 A
3423238 Weiland Jan 1969 A
3454456 Willey Jul 1969 A
3459571 Shannon Aug 1969 A
3513009 Sauer et al. May 1970 A
3573947 Kinkade Apr 1971 A
3616173 Green et al. Oct 1971 A
3649319 Smith Mar 1972 A
3666581 Lane May 1972 A
3674726 Kirk Jul 1972 A
3719513 Bragg et al. Mar 1973 A
3797758 Cherdron et al. Mar 1974 A
3830687 Re et al. Aug 1974 A
3839059 Rothfelder et al. Oct 1974 A
3847630 Compernass et al. Nov 1974 A
3908062 Roberts Sep 1975 A
3913571 Bayer et al. Oct 1975 A
3944698 Dierks et al. Mar 1976 A
3981831 Markusch et al. Sep 1976 A
3988199 Hillmer et al. Oct 1976 A
3989534 Plunguian et al. Nov 1976 A
3993822 Knauf et al. Nov 1976 A
4009062 Long Feb 1977 A
4011392 Rudolph et al. Mar 1977 A
4019920 Burkard et al. Apr 1977 A
4021257 Bernett May 1977 A
4048434 Speakman Sep 1977 A
4051291 Long Sep 1977 A
4061611 Glowaky et al. Dec 1977 A
4073658 Ohtani et al. Feb 1978 A
4097422 Markusch Jun 1978 A
4097423 Dieterich Jun 1978 A
4133784 Otey et al. Jan 1979 A
4174230 Hashimoto et al. Nov 1979 A
4184887 Lange et al. Jan 1980 A
4190547 Mahnke et al. Feb 1980 A
4195110 Dierks et al. Mar 1980 A
4233368 Baehr et al. Nov 1980 A
4234345 Fässle Nov 1980 A
4237260 Lange et al. Dec 1980 A
4265964 Burkhart May 1981 A
4265979 Baehr et al. May 1981 A
4309391 O'Neill Jan 1982 A
4327146 White Apr 1982 A
4328178 Kossatz May 1982 A
4392896 Sakakibara Jul 1983 A
4451649 Teubner et al. May 1984 A
4452978 Eastman Jun 1984 A
4487864 Bermudez et al. Dec 1984 A
4518652 Willoughby May 1985 A
4533528 Zaskalicky Aug 1985 A
4573534 Baker et al. Mar 1986 A
4613627 Sherman et al. Sep 1986 A
4624574 Mills et al. Nov 1986 A
4647486 Ali Mar 1987 A
4654085 Schinski Mar 1987 A
4722866 Wilson et al. Feb 1988 A
4725477 Kole et al. Feb 1988 A
4837314 Eastman Jun 1989 A
4842786 Betzner Jun 1989 A
4853085 Johnstone et al. Aug 1989 A
4939192 T'sas Jul 1990 A
4965031 Conroy Oct 1990 A
4966739 Stipek et al. Oct 1990 A
5037929 Rajagopalan et al. Aug 1991 A
5041333 Conroy Aug 1991 A
5080717 Young Jan 1992 A
5085929 Bruce et al. Feb 1992 A
5093093 Koslowski Mar 1992 A
5116671 Bruce et al. May 1992 A
5135805 Sellers et al. Aug 1992 A
5154874 Koslowski Oct 1992 A
5158612 Savoly et al. Oct 1992 A
5171366 Richards et al. Dec 1992 A
5207830 Cowan et al. May 1993 A
5227100 Koslowski et al. Jul 1993 A
5302308 Roe Apr 1994 A
5342566 Schäfer et al. Aug 1994 A
5366550 Schad Nov 1994 A
5385607 Kiesewetter et al. Jan 1995 A
5395438 Baig et al. Mar 1995 A
5432215 Girg et al. Jul 1995 A
5449533 Morizane Sep 1995 A
5534059 Immordino, Jr. Jul 1996 A
5558710 Baig Sep 1996 A
5573333 Dahlman Nov 1996 A
5575840 DeWacker Nov 1996 A
5575844 Bradshaw Nov 1996 A
5595595 Glenn Jan 1997 A
5643510 Sucech Jul 1997 A
5660465 Mason Aug 1997 A
5660900 Andersen et al. Aug 1997 A
5683625 Berthiaume et al. Nov 1997 A
5683635 Sucech et al. Nov 1997 A
5733367 Soeda et al. Mar 1998 A
5746822 Espinoza et al. May 1998 A
5798010 Richards et al. Aug 1998 A
5798425 Albrecht et al. Aug 1998 A
5810956 Tanis et al. Sep 1998 A
5817262 Englert Oct 1998 A
5871857 Alhamad Feb 1999 A
5876563 Greenwood Mar 1999 A
5879446 Patel et al. Mar 1999 A
5922447 Baig Jul 1999 A
5945208 Richards et al. Aug 1999 A
5962119 Chan Oct 1999 A
6051700 Wang Apr 2000 A
6054088 Alhamad Apr 2000 A
6059444 Johnson et al. May 2000 A
6110271 Skaggs et al. Aug 2000 A
6110575 Haga Aug 2000 A
6162288 Kindt et al. Dec 2000 A
6162839 Klauck et al. Dec 2000 A
6171388 Jobbins Jan 2001 B1
6171655 Shintome Jan 2001 B1
6221521 Lynn et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227186 Seidl et al. May 2001 B1
6231970 Andersen et al. May 2001 B1
6241815 Bonen Jun 2001 B1
6290769 Carkner Sep 2001 B1
6299970 Richards et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309740 Shu et al. Oct 2001 B1
6319312 Luongo Nov 2001 B1
6334280 Frappart et al. Jan 2002 B1
6340388 Luongo Jan 2002 B1
6340389 Klus Jan 2002 B1
6342284 Yu et al. Jan 2002 B1
6387171 Taylor et al. May 2002 B1
6387172 Yu et al. May 2002 B1
6391958 Luongo May 2002 B1
6398864 Przybysz et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406535 Shintome Jun 2002 B1
6406537 Immordino Jun 2002 B1
6409819 Ko Jun 2002 B1
6409824 Veeramasuneni et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409825 Yu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6443258 Putt et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475313 Peterson et al. Nov 2002 B1
6481171 Yu et al. Nov 2002 B2
6485821 Bruce et al. Nov 2002 B1
6524679 Hauber et al. Feb 2003 B2
6533854 Kesselring et al. Mar 2003 B2
6572698 Ko Jun 2003 B1
6613424 Putt et al. Sep 2003 B1
6632550 Yu et al. Oct 2003 B1
6673144 Immordino, Jr. et al. Jan 2004 B2
6680127 Capps Jan 2004 B2
6706112 Sironi et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706128 Sethuraman Mar 2004 B2
6711872 Anderson Mar 2004 B2
6743830 Soane et al. Jun 2004 B2
6746781 Francis et al. Jun 2004 B2
6773639 Moyes et al. Aug 2004 B2
6774146 Savoly et al. Aug 2004 B2
6777517 Albrecht et al. Aug 2004 B1
6780356 Putt et al. Aug 2004 B1
6780903 Peltonen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6783587 Sethuraman et al. Aug 2004 B2
6800131 Yu et al. Oct 2004 B2
6814799 Sasage et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815049 Veeramasuneni et al. Nov 2004 B2
6822033 Yu et al. Nov 2004 B2
6832652 Dillenbeck et al. Dec 2004 B1
6841232 Tagge et al. Jan 2005 B2
6846357 Reddy et al. Jan 2005 B2
6878321 Hauber et al. Apr 2005 B2
6893752 Veeramasuneni et al. May 2005 B2
6902797 Pollock et al. Jun 2005 B2
6964704 Cox et al. Nov 2005 B2
6983821 Putt et al. Jan 2006 B2
7048794 Tagge et al. May 2006 B2
7056582 Carbo et al. Jun 2006 B2
7090883 Phipps Aug 2006 B2
7101426 Tagge et al. Sep 2006 B2
7105587 Tagge et al. Sep 2006 B2
7172403 Burke Feb 2007 B2
7217754 Koloski et al. May 2007 B2
7244304 Yu et al. Jul 2007 B2
7285586 Helbling et al. Oct 2007 B2
7347895 Dubey Mar 2008 B2
7364015 Englert et al. Apr 2008 B2
7413603 Miller et al. Aug 2008 B2
7422638 Trksak et al. Sep 2008 B2
7425236 Yu et al. Sep 2008 B2
7455728 Losch et al. Nov 2008 B2
7524386 George et al. Apr 2009 B2
7544242 Liu et al. Jun 2009 B2
7572328 Lettkeman et al. Aug 2009 B2
7572329 Liu et al. Aug 2009 B2
7608347 Lettkeman et al. Oct 2009 B2
7637996 Blackburn et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644548 Guevara et al. Jan 2010 B2
7696253 Wantling et al. Apr 2010 B2
7708847 Sahay May 2010 B2
7731794 Yu et al. Jun 2010 B2
7736720 Yu et al. Jun 2010 B2
7758980 Yu et al. Jul 2010 B2
7767019 Liu et al. Aug 2010 B2
7771851 Song et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776461 Blackburn et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776462 Liu et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803226 Wang et al. Sep 2010 B2
7811685 Wang et al. Oct 2010 B2
7815730 Wang et al. Oct 2010 B2
7819993 Seki et al. Oct 2010 B2
7842218 Bonetto et al. Nov 2010 B2
7851057 Englert et al. Dec 2010 B2
7875114 Wittbold et al. Jan 2011 B2
7892472 Veeramasuneni et al. Feb 2011 B2
7932193 Kajander Apr 2011 B2
7932308 Lettkeman et al. Apr 2011 B2
7964034 Yu et al. Jun 2011 B2
20010001218 Luongo May 2001 A1
20020017222 Luongo Feb 2002 A1
20020096278 Foster et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020108532 Kesselring et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112651 Yu et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030019176 Anderson Jan 2003 A1
20030073798 Kightlinger et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030084980 Seufert et al. May 2003 A1
20030092784 Tagge et al. May 2003 A1
20030150360 Huntsman et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040005484 Veeramasuneni et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040026002 Weldon et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040045481 Sethuraman et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055720 Torras, Sr. et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040065232 Lykke Apr 2004 A1
20040092190 Bruce et al. May 2004 A1
20040092625 Pollock et al. May 2004 A1
20040107872 Matsuyama et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040121152 Toas Jun 2004 A1
20040131714 Burke Jul 2004 A1
20040149170 Moran Aug 2004 A1
20040152379 McLarty, III et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040209071 Carbo et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040231916 Englert et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040242861 Kightlinger et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040244646 Larsen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050019618 Yu et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050048190 Trksak et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050061203 Helbling et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050126437 Tagge et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142348 Kajander et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050150427 Liu et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050181693 Kajander Aug 2005 A1
20050191465 Mayers et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050219938 Rigaudon et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050223949 Bailey, Jr. et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050241541 Hohn et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250858 Wantling et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050250888 Lettkeman et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050263925 Heseltine et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050281999 Hofmann et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060029785 Wang et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060054060 Dubey Mar 2006 A1
20060090674 Fukuda et al. May 2006 A1
20060150868 Spickemann et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060162839 Seki et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060278127 Liu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060278128 Liu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060278129 Liu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060278132 Yu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060278133 Yu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060280898 Lettkeman et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060280899 Liu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070022913 Wang et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070032393 Patel et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070048490 Yu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070056478 Miller et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070059513 Yu et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070082170 Colbert et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070102237 Baig May 2007 A1
20070221098 Wolbers et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070251628 Yu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070255032 Bichler et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080000392 Blackburn et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080060316 Fukuda et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080066651 Park Mar 2008 A1
20080070026 Yu et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080087366 Yu et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080090068 Yu et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080148997 Blackburn et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080190062 Engbrecht et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227891 Jarvie et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080286609 Surace et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080299413 Song et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080308968 Immordino, Jr. Dec 2008 A1
20090010093 Sethuraman et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090011207 Dubey Jan 2009 A1
20090053544 Sethuraman Feb 2009 A1
20090123727 Martin et al. May 2009 A1
20090126300 Fujiwara et al. May 2009 A1
20090130452 Surace et al. May 2009 A1
20090151602 Francis Jun 2009 A1
20090156080 Finch et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090162602 Cottier et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090169864 Wang et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090169878 Rigaudon et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100031853 Visocekas et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100075166 Gilley Mar 2010 A1
20100075167 Gilley et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100088984 Guevara et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100136269 Andersen et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100139528 Yu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100143682 Shake et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100221402 Wang et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110009564 Wang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110054053 Lee et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110132235 Yu et al. Jun 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (58)
Number Date Country
486746 Nov 1975 AU
710-1995 Nov 1995 CL
1895-1998 Mar 1999 CL
1957-2003 Jun 2004 CL
1435-2006 Sep 2006 CL
1436-2006 Sep 2006 CL
2217-06 Nov 2006 CL
2289-2006 Apr 2007 CL
910-2007 May 2007 CL
3124-07 Mar 2008 CL
1237148 Dec 1999 CN
0216497 Apr 1987 EP
409781 Jan 1991 EP
955277 Nov 1999 EP
941399 Nov 1963 GB
1028890 May 1966 GB
1250713 Oct 1971 GB
1381457 Jan 1975 GB
1504929 Mar 1978 GB
2053779 Feb 1981 GB
05-293350 Nov 1993 JP
08-231258 Sep 1996 JP
09-165244 Jun 1997 JP
2001-504795 Apr 2001 JP
2003-020262 Jan 2003 JP
2003-531096 Oct 2003 JP
1020060123582 Dec 2006 KR
19098 Feb 2008 KZ
2215708 Nov 2003 RU
885178 Nov 1981 SU
887506 Dec 1981 SU
27041 Feb 2000 UA
52047 Dec 2002 UA
88764 Nov 2009 UA
WO 9531415 Nov 1995 WO
9908978 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9908979 Feb 1999 WO
WO 0006518 Feb 2000 WO
0134534 May 2001 WO
WO 0145932 Jun 2001 WO
0181263 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0181264 Nov 2001 WO
03000620 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03040055 May 2003 WO
WO 03053878 Jul 2003 WO
03082766 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004002916 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004033581 Apr 2004 WO
2004-039749 May 2004 WO
WO 2004061042 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004083146 Sep 2004 WO
2005080294 Sep 2005 WO
2006135707 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006071116 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006135613 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2006135707 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2006138273 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007024420 Mar 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100139528 A1 Jun 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60688839 Jun 2005 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11449177 Jun 2006 US
Child 12709159 US