This invention relates to optical beam steering, and more particularly to small angle optical beam steering using Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) Micro-Mirror Arrays MMAS).
Active optical systems use laser radiation to illuminate a scene. In various conventional approaches, an illumination source is positioned to continuously illinate an entire scene within a Field of View (FOV). Such illumination sources consume a great deal of power. Other approaches have suggested positioning beamforming optics on a gimbal system, which would allow mechanical movement of the system to scan the scene to reduce power consumption. However, with these typical solutions the cost and weight of the associated system significantly increases while the speed of the system decreases.
Another approach is to use a waveguide such as a liquid crystal waveguide (LCWG) to steer a beam of optical radiation provided by an illumination source. A waveguide solution can be implemented at lower cost and less weight. However, the non-mechanical beamsteering waveguide and particularly the LCWG has been found to have a number of limitations, which may include, but are not limited to, steering a very narrow band of wavelengths about a center wavelength, limited steering range and limited speed. Furthermore each material system e.g., substrates, coatings and liquid crystals, and voltage settings to steer the laser beam are unique to each center wavelength. Therefore to accommodate different wavelengths requires different LCWG devices and significant investment in materials, manufacturing, set-up and calibration etc. to design and field each device.
Optical imaging systems, passive or active, use movable optical elements to image a scene. In various conventional approaches, a single optic is positioned by a gimbal system to stabilize the line-of-sight of the optical receiver. However, with these typical systems, the cost and weight of the associated system also significantly increases and the line of sight stability is low.
The following is a summary of the invention in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the invention. This summary is not intended to identify key or critical elements of the invention or to delineate the scope of the invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of the invention in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description and the defining claims that are presented later.
The present invention provides an approach to small angle optical beam steering using a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) Micro-Mirror Array (MMA) that minimizes diffraction for a specified steering angle. Generally speaking, this is accomplished with a MEMS MMA. that exhibits a “piston” capability to translate individual mirrors in addition to the tip and tilt capabilities. Adjacent mirrors can be tipped/tilted to the specified steering angle and then translated by a requisite amount to approximate a continuous surface. For a specified steering angle, the MEMS MMA is partitioned into one or more sections with each section including the maximum number of mirrors that can be grouped together and actuated to approximate a continuous surface given a maximum translation z. As a result, the only edge discontinuities exist between adjacent sections thereby minimizing diffraction effects for a given steering angle, In a transmit system, this reduces wavefront distortion of the transmitted beam. In a receive system, this reduces distortion thereby increase imaging resolution.
In most cases, the requirement to approximate a continuous surface across each section limits the steering range of the MEMS MMA to small angles. For example, a MEMS MMA that might support +/−15° tip or tilt of each mirror, may be limited to a steering range of less than +/−5° tip or tilt to approximate a continuous surface with two or more mirrors. This is greatly dependent upon the maximum translation z achievable in a given implementation of the MEMS MMA. In most applications, loss of steering range would make this approach impractical. However, in certain applications small angle steering is sufficient, For example, space based systems that operate at long ranges may require only a few degrees of steering to transmit the beam. In addition, small angle steering may be used on the receiver side to, for example, stabilize the line of sight for a system operating in a vibrating environment.
In an embodiment, each mirror rotates about X and Y orthogonal axes, respectively, and translates along a Z axis orthogonal the Xi plane to tip, tilt and piston. In an implementation of such an embodiment, each mirror is supported at three vertices of an equilateral triangle. Lines defined by three different pairs of vertices provide three axes at 60 degrees to one another in the XY plane. Each mirror pivots about each of the axes to produce tilt, tip and piston in the XYZ space. Other implementations may provide tip, tilt and piston in the XYZ space.
In different embodiments, the partitioning of the MEMS MMA into sections may be “fixed” or “adapted”. In a fixed implementation, the number of sections is determined to satisfy a maximum steering angle specified for the system or vice-versa. The mirrors are actuated within each section to approximate a continuous surface at a specified steering angle. This approach is sub-optimal in the sense that diffraction is not minimized for the smallest angles but does not require updating the partition of the MMA with updates of the steering angle. In an adaptive implementation, the MEMS MMA is repartitioned for each update of the specified steering angle to select the minimum number of sections (maximum grouping of mirrors) that can approximate a continuous surface at the specified steering angle.
In different embodiments, the MEMS MMA is responsive to command signals to partition itself into a plurality of segments, each segment including a plurality of mirrors to form and independently steer a plurality of optical beams at specified steering angles. For each segment, the controller determines the maximum number of mirrors that may be grouped together in sections as limited by the maximum translation z to form a continuous surface at specified tip and tilt angles to provide the specified steering angle. In an embodiment, the mirrors in different segments reflect light at different wavelengths such that the plurality of optical beams provide a diversity of wavelengths. This may be accomplished by using a plurality of sources at different wavelengths, optical coatings at different wavelengths or a combination thereof.
In different embodiments, the system further utilizes the piston capability of the MEMS MMA to perform additional optical functions to shape the beam. For example, piston capability can be used to perform one or more of the following including adjusting a size, divergence or intensity profile of the beam, producing deviations in the wavefront of the beam to compensate for atmospheric distortion or to adjust the phase for path length variations across the beam and maintain a zero phase difference across the beam, or adding optical power to focus or defocus the beam.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:
To overcome limitations of using a waveguide to perform beam steering, another approach is to use a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) Micro-Mirror Array (MMA) to steer a beam of optical radiation. MEMS MMA beam steering may be used in an active system to steer the beam provided by an illumination source or stabilize line of sight for a receiver, passive or active. The MEMS MMA comprises an array of independently and continuously tunable mirrors that can tip and tilt to re-direct the beam. The MEMS MMA typically exhibits a larger steering range and faster speeds than the LCWG. For many applications, the ability to steer the beam quickly over larger angles allows the MEMS MMA to prosecute a larger Field-of-Regard (FOR) than the waveguide approach. Furthermore, the MEMS MMA can be implement for different wavelengths without changing the material system or the beam steering settings. Different wavelengths can be realized by using a plurality of sources at different wavelengths, optical coatings at different wavelengths or a combination thereof.
As shown in
The present invention provides an approach to small angle optical beam steering using a MEMS MMA that reduces and possibly minimizes diffraction for a specified steering angle. Generally speaking, this is accomplished with a MEMS MMA that exhibits a “piston” capability to translate individual mirrors in addition to the tip and tilt capabilities. Adjacent mirrors can be tipped/tilt to the specified steering angle and then translated by requisite amounts to approximate a continuous surface. For a specified steering angle, the MEMS MMA is partitioned into one or more sections with each section including the maximum number of mirrors that can be grouped together and actuated to approximate a continuous surface given a maximum translation z. As a result, the only edge discontinuities exist between adjacent sections thereby minimizing diffraction effects for a given steering angle.
It is to be appreciated that embodiments of the methods and systems discussed herein are not limited in application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The methods and systems are capable of implementation in other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Examples of specific implementations are provided herein for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be limiting. Also, the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use herein of “including,” “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. References to “or” may be construed as inclusive so that any terms described using “or” may indicate any of a single, more than one, and all of the described terms. Any references to front and back, left and right, top and bottom, upper and lower, and vertical and horizontal are intended for convenience of description, not to limit the present systems and methods or their components to any one positional or spatial orientation.
Referring to the example active imaging system 100 illustrated in
While illustrated as separate from the controller 112 of the active imaging 100, in certain examples, the positioning system 102 may be combined with one or more other components of the imaging 100, such as the control circuitry 112, For example, the positioning system 102 and other combined components of the active imaging system 100 may include a combination of software-configured elements, control circuitry, signal processing circuitry, application specific integrated circuit, or any combination of various hardware and logic circuitry for performing the various processes discussed herein.
According to various examples, an optical source(s) 104 is in optical communication with MEMS MMA 106 and configured to generate and provide a beam of electromagnetic radiation. In particular, the optical source 104 may generate the beam of electromagnetic radiation at a desired wavelength, such as any wavelength of shortwave infrared (SWIR) radiation. Accordingly, in certain examples the optical source 104 may include an active SWIR laser configured to emit SWIR radiation within a wavelength range of approximately 0.9-1.7 micrometers. However, in other examples the optical source 104 may include any other suitable source of electromagnetic radiation, such as a NIR (near-infrared) laser or a visible light source. In one embodiment, electromagnetic radiation generated by the optical source 104 is coherent, and the system 100 includes one or more collimating optics. In certain embodiments, optical source 104 may emit broadband electromagnetic radiation that spans multiple discrete wavelengths. In other embodiments, different optical sources 104 may emit electromagnetic radiation at different discrete wavelengths, which may either span a specified broadband or may be non-contiguous. The optical source may be continuous wave laser for scene illumination such as visible, 808 nm, 980 nm or 1550 nm.
As illustrated in
In certain examples, the optical path length of optical beam 132 will vary across the spatial extent of the beam due to either a non-uniform thickness of optically transparent window 130, which may be flat, hemispheric, ogive or other shape, or the angle of the beam through the window. This induces curvature to the wavefront. The MEMS MMA 106, and specifically its piston capability, may be configured through calibration to compensate for variations in path length and remove the curvature.
In certain examples, it is desirable to compensate for atmospheric distortion, which varies with time. A source 134 is positioned to emit electromagnetic radiation e.g. SWIR in an optical beam preferably having a “flat-top” intensity profile. Source 134 may be a pulsed laser at 1064 nm. A beam steerer 136 such as a rotating mirror, LCWG or MEMS MMA steers the beam to illuminate scene 120. A wavefront sensor 138 measures the wavefront of the reflected optical beam. Alternate embodiments may combine some or all functions of the imaging and wavefront correction sensor into a single system including the optical source, beam steering and sensor. Controller 112 generates command signals to configure the MEMS MMA, and specifically its piston capability, to compensate for the atmospheric distortion.
As best shown in
More specifically, for small angle beam steering the Piston capability can be used to provide the requisite translation of mirrors within a section to approximate a continuous surface at a specified steering angle (combined tip and tilt angles). The maximum amount of translation “z” of the mirror to Piston limits the maximum steering angle that can be serviced for a given grouping of mirrors in a section. The greater the number of mirrors, the smaller the maximum steering angle. More specifically, the maximum angle is given by arcsin(z/w) where w is the width of the section e.g. number of mirrors in a given direction multiplied by the width of the mirror. Therefore, for small angles, the MEMS MMA can be partitioned into a small number of sections thereby limiting the number of edge discontinuities, hence the amount of diffraction.
The piston capability can also be used to perform other beam shaping functions such as to focus the beam in size or shape. The Piston capability can also be used to adjust the size, divergence or intensity profile of the beam, produce deviations in the wavefront of the beam to compensate for atmospheric distortions, adjust phase to maintain a zero phase difference across the beam, add optical power to the beam to focus or defocus the beam or to improve the formation and steering of the beam by approximating a continuous surface across the micro-mirrors, which reduces unwanted diffraction to increase power in the f optical beam.
The MEMS MMA is preferably capable of steering an output laser beam over a range of at least −15°×+15° in tip and tilt (30°×30° and steering range) and +/−15 microns (at least one-half wavelength in either direction) piston at a rate of at least 1 KHz (<1 millisecond). The independently controllable mirrors can be adaptively segmented to form any number of optical beams, adjust the size/power of a given optical beam, generate multi-spectral optical beams and to combine multiple input sources. Further, the MEMS MMA must have a sufficient number of mirrors, mirror size/resolution, fill factor, range of motion, response time, response accuracy and uniformity across the array.
One such MEMS MMA is described in U.S. Pat. No 10,444,492 entitled “Flexure-Based, Tip-Tilt-Piston Actuation Micro-Array”, which is hereby incorporated by reference. As shown in
As shown in
As expected, as the section width increases, the maximum tip decreases but the diffraction spot size also decreases indicating less diffraction due to fewer edge discontinuities. For this specific MEMS MMA configuration e.g. number of mirrors, size of the mirror, max piston etc. the serviceable angular range to gain benefits from approximating a continuous surface across multiple mirrors that form a section is quite small, 2 degrees or less. Although shown in Table 1 the entry for a section including only a single mirror is a degenerate case. For a single mirror, the limiting factor is the maximum tip (or tilt) angle 302 of the mirror itself. In this example, that is 15 degrees, not 4 degrees as suggested by the geometry. As such, in this example, which is exemplary of typical MMA configurations, considerable steering angle range may be sacrificed in order to reduce diffraction.
In light of this, configuring the MEMS MMA to approximate continuous surfaces across surfaces may not be practical for many typical applications in which a large steering range is required. This approach may be limited to applications such as the aforementioned long range steering as found in space-based systems or to compensate for small angular adjustments such as found on imaging platforms to compensate for vibration. A hybrid approach in which the MEMS MMA is configured as shown in
In a different MEMS MMA configuration in which, for example, the individual mirror tip (or tilt) angle 304 is much less and the maximum piston z is larger, that individual mirror tip may constrain the maximum angle at which a continuous surface can be formed. In this circumstance, the MEMS MMA would be at most partitioned into the number of sections that would support that maximum angle. To form more and smaller sections would simply sacrifice diffraction losses for no reason.
In different embodiments, the partitioning of the MEMS MMA into sections may be “fixed” or “adapted”. In a fixed implementation, the number of sections is determined to satisfy a maximum steering angle specified for the system or vice-versa. The mirrors are actuated within each section to approximate a continuous surface at a specified steering angle. This approach is sub-optimal in the sense that diffraction is not minimized for the smallest angles but does not require updating the partition of the MMA with updates of the steering angle. In an adaptive implementation, the MEMS MMA is repartitioned for each update of the specified steering angle to select the minimum number of sections (maximum grouping of mirrors) that can approximate a continuous surface at the specified steering angle.
In addition to providing the requisite translations of the mirrors to approximate the continuous surface within a section to reduce diffraction, the MEMS MMA's piston capability can be simultaneously used to perform other useful beam shaping optical functions such as, but not limited to, (a) adjusting a size, divergence or intensity profile of the beam, (b) producing deviations in the wavefront of the beam to compensate for atmospheric distortion, (c) producing deviations in the wavefront of the beam to adjust the phase for path length variations across the beam and maintain a zero phase difference across the beam, (d) adding optical power to focus or defocus the beam or combinations thereof. These are important optical functions that are not supported by other beamsteering devices such as gimballed mirrors, LCWGs or MEMS MMAs that do not have piston capability.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
In addition to partitioning the MEMS MMA into one or more sections to reduce diffraction for small angle steering of an optical beam, the MEMS MMA may be partitioned at a higher level into “segments”, each segment partitioned into one or more “sections” to form and independently steer a plurality of optical beams of the same or different wavelength composition with reduced diffractions. The segments do not need to be equally sized, can be any portion of the array and can be changed on the fly in number, size or location. A single broadband source may be positioned to emit optical radiation that spans all of the wavelengths onto the entire MEMS MMA. It may more efficient to use multiple narrowband sources positioned to emit optical radiation at the wavelength corresponding to a. respective segment. All of the mirrors may be provided with a broadband reflective coating or a narrowband reflective coating at a particular wavelength. Or the mirrors in each of the segments may be provided with narrowband reflective coatings at different wavelengths.
As illustrated in
Additional piston actuation may be included to compensate for path length variation and/or to correct for atmospheric distortion in some or all of the optical beams at the different wavelengths. In response to command signals, the MEMS MMA may form and scan all of the optical beams over the first portion of the scene to provide multi-spectral illumination. Alternately, the MEMS MMA may scan one or more of the optical beams over the first portion of the scene while scanning one or more of the optical beams at different wavelengths over a different portion of the scene e.g. features in previously scanned regions of the scene. In addition, one or more segments at a given wavelength may be partitioned into multiple sub-segments thereby generate a plurality of independently scanned optical beams at the given wavelength.
As described above with reference to
In act 602 the process 600 may include, configuring the MEMS MMA to, for example, provide different sections of the MMA with different reflective coatings for independent multi-spectral operation or the same broadband coating to produce each optical beam with multiple spectral components.
In act 604 the process 600 may include calibrating the MEMS MMA to determine the minimum number of sections N for a specified steering angle and the command signals to tip/tilt/piston the mirrors to achieve specific steering angles for each section configuration. The calibration may further include the command signals to shape a particular optical beam to provide, for example, focus. For each of these the command signals to tip/tilt/piston each mirror can be stored in different LUTs.
In act 606, the process 600 may include emitting optical radiation from the optical source(s) along the transmit path(s). A single narrowband or broadband optical source may illuminate the entire MEMS MMA. Multiple sources may illuminate different sections of the MEMS MMA and be combined into a single beam. Multiple narrowband sources at different wavelengths may illuminate different sections of the MEMS MMA for independent multi-spectral scanning.
In act 608, the process 600 may partition the MEMS MMA for multi-segment, multi-spectral or beam combined operation.
In act 610, the process 600 may partition each segment of the MEMS MMA into one or more sections as previously determined to reduce diffraction at the specified steering angle for that segment.
In act 612, for each segment, the process 600 tips, tilts and pistons to approximate continuous surfaces in one or more surfaces to steer the optical beam at the specified steering angle.
In act 614, for each segment r beam), the process 600 may perform additional Piston (as well as tip and tilt possibly) to further shape beam. Beam “shaping” may include for example, focusing the beam or providing deviations of the wavefront to compensate for path length variation and/or atmospheric distortion.
In act 616, the process 600 scans the optical beam(s) over at least a first area of the scene. Act 616 may further include scanning additional optical beams to revisit previously scanned portions or scanning additional optical beams in parallel over different areas of the scene.
In act 618, the process 600 may fix the number of sections for each segment to service a maximum steering angle. Thereafter, the controller issues commands to tip/tilt/piston the mirrors based on the fixed sections to service subsequent updates received in act 620 to the steering angle. Alternately, in act 612 the controller can determine the optimum number of sections for each update of the steering angle, re-partition each segment based on the updated number of sections and issue command signals to tip, tilt and piston the mirrors within each section based on the updated partitioning.
While several illustrative embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, numerous variations and alternate embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. Such variations and alternate embodiments are contemplated, and can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5404375 | Kroeger et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5854702 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
6181450 | Dishman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6271953 | Dishman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6327063 | Rockwell | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6567574 | Ma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6792028 | Cook et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7304296 | Mills et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7593641 | Tegge, Jr. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7626152 | King et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7660235 | Alicherry et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667190 | Mills et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7969558 | Hall | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8164037 | Jenkins et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8301027 | Shaw et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305578 | Mudge et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8311372 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8368889 | Schwiegerling et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8380025 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8463080 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8767190 | Hall | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8823848 | Chipman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8983293 | Frankel et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9473768 | Uyeno et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9477135 | Uyeno et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9632166 | Trail et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9857226 | LeMaster et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9904081 | Uyeno et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9927515 | Keller et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10148056 | Uyeno et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10209439 | Keller et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10243654 | Uyeno et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10267915 | Uyeno et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10381701 | Motoi | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10444492 | Hopkins et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10718491 | Raring et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
10969598 | Fest et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998965 | Tong et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11042025 | Uyeno et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11333879 | Uyeno et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
20020141689 | Qian et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020196506 | Graves et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030062468 | Byren et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081321 | Moon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030185488 | Blumenthal | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040072540 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081466 | Walther et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040141752 | Shelton et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040258415 | Boone et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013003 | Marom | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031255 | Schroeder et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050100339 | Tegge | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122566 | Cicchiello | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050288031 | Davis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060038103 | Helmbrecht | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070031157 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036480 | Wu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080050064 | Sakai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090202254 | Majumdar et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100149533 | Fest | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100166430 | Alten | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120002973 | Bruzzi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008133 | Silny et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120114337 | Aoki | May 2012 | A1 |
20120155885 | Hannah et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130271818 | Bastien et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140063299 | Fest et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150099476 | Beals | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150172218 | Beshai | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150311981 | Inagaki et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150378242 | Auxier et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160003677 | Pezzaniti et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160043800 | Kingsbury et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160234703 | Aldana et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160294472 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170293137 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180231715 | Bishop et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190154921 | Xing et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200244359 | Csonka et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20210088776 | Uyeno et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210091854 | Uyeno et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210092260 | Uyeno et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20220229160 | Uyeno et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220232144 | Uyeno et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220236383 | Uyeno et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005213216 | Aug 2005 | AU |
2005213231 | Aug 2005 | AU |
1393710 | Jan 2003 | CN |
1393711 | Jan 2003 | CN |
1393712 | Jan 2003 | CN |
1393714 | Jan 2003 | CN |
110226103 | Sep 2019 | CN |
102011104023.8 | Jul 2019 | DE |
2667142 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2533003 | Aug 2018 | EP |
WO-2005125193 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO-2006042696 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2010032224 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO-2010049076 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2014145792 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014200581 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 19, 2022”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/150,286, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 17, 2022”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/150,286, Response filed Apr. 29, 2022 to Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2022”, 12 pgs. |
Bishop, Bob, “Northrop Grumman-Developed Beacon Illuminator Laser Proves Reliability in Airborne Laser Ground, Air Tests”, Northrop Grumman Corporation, [Online], Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://news.northropgrumman.com/news/releases/northrop-grumman-developed-beacon-illuminator-laser-proves-reliability-in-airborne-laser-ground-air-tests?>, (Aug. 13, 2009), 2 pgs. |
Kelchner, Bryan, et al., “ABL beam control segment”, SPIE, vol. 3381, (Sep. 8, 1998), 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/871,602, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 19, 2020”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/871,602, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 24, 2021”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/871,602, Response filed Feb. 8, 2021 to Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2020”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 3, 2021”, 35 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Response filed Dec. 1, 2021 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 3, 2021”, 16 pgs. |
“High Contrast IR Wire Grid Polarizers”, Edmund Optics, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.edmundoptics.com/f/high-contrast-ir-wire-grid-polarizers/14797/>, (Accessed Sep. 4, 2021), 1 pg. |
“Mid-Wave Infrared (MWIR) and Long-Wave Infrared (LWIF) Waveplates”, Edmund Optics, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.edmundoptics.com/f/mid-wave-infrared-mwir-and-long-wave-infrared-lwir-waveplates/14317/>, (Accessed Sep. 4, 2021), 2 pgs. |
“Mirrorcle Technologies MEMS Mirrors—Technical Overview”, Mirrorcle Technologies, Inc., (2018), 7 pgs. |
Ayral, J.-L., et al., “Phase-conjugate Nd:YAG laser with internal acousto-optic beam steering”, Optics Letters, vol. 16, No. 16, (Aug. 15, 1991), 1225-1227. |
Chiu, Yi, et al., “Shape-Optimized Electrooptic Beam Scanners: Analysis, Design, and Simulation”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 17, No. 1, (Jan. 1999), 108-114. |
Kim, et al., “Demonstration of large-angle nonmechanical laser beam steering based on LC polymer polarization grating”, Proc., of SPIE vol. 8052 80520T, (May 13, 2011). |
Kim, Jihwan, et al., “Wide-angle, nonmechanical beam steering using thin liquid crystal polarization gratings”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 7093, (2008), 12 pgs. |
King, D F, et al., “3rd-Generation 1280 × 720 FPA development status at Raytheon Vision Systems”, Proc. of SPIE vol. 6206 62060W-1, (2006), 16 pgs. |
Norton, Andrew, et al., “High-Power Visible-Laser Effect on a 37-Segment Iris AO Deformable Mirror”, Proc. SPIE 7595, MEMS Adaptive Optics IV, 759506, (Feb. 17, 2010), 12 pgs. |
Salmon, J.T., et al., “An Adaptive Optics System for Solid-State Laser Systems used in Inertial Confinement Fusion”, First Annual International Conference on Solid-State Lasers for Application of Intertial Confinement Fusion, Monterey, California, May 30-Jun. 2, 1995, (Sep. 17, 1995), 13 pgs. |
Siegman, A. E., “Unstable optical resonators for laser applications”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 53, Issue 3, Mar. 2965, 277-287. |
Wang, Jinxue, et al., “Doppler Winds Lidar Technology Development and Demonstration”, AIAA-2005-6772, Space 2005, Long Beach, California, Aug. 30-1, 2005, 11 pgs. |
Yamamoto, R., et al., “Evolution of a Solid State Laser”, Proc. SPIE 6552, Laser Source Technology for Defense and Security III, 655205, (May 10, 2007), 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/007,917, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 10, 2022”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 17/150,286, Non Final Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2022”, 13 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220229285 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |