Small volume in vitro analyte sensor and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6749740
  • Patent Number
    6,749,740
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 28, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 15, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A small volume sensor, and methods of making, for determining the concentration of an analyte, such as glucose or lactate, in a biological fluid, such as blood or serum, using techniques such as coulometry, amperometry, and potentiometry. The sensor includes a working electrode and a counter electrode, and can include an insertion monitoring trace to determine correct positioning of the sensor in a connector. In one embodiment, the sensor determines the concentration of the analyte by discharging an amount of charge into the sample, determining the time needed to discharge the charge, and determining the current used to electrolyze a portion of the analyte using the amount of charge and the amount of time.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to analytical sensors for the detection of bioanalytes in a small volume sample, and methods of making and using the sensors.




BACKGROUND




Analytical sensors are useful in chemistry and medicine to determine the presence and concentration of a biological analyte. Such sensors are needed, for example, to monitor glucose in diabetic patients and lactate during critical care events.




Currently available technology measures bioanalytes in relatively large sample volumes, e.g., generally requiring 3 microliters or more of blood or other biological fluid. These fluid samples are obtained from a patient, for example, using a needle and syringe, or by lancing a portion of the skin such as the fingertip and “milking” the area to obtain a useful sample volume. These procedures are inconvenient for the patient, and often painful, particularly when frequent samples are required. Less painful methods for obtaining a sample are known such as lancing the arm or thigh, which have a lower nerve ending density. However, lancing the body in the preferred regions typically produces submicroliter samples of blood, because these regions are not heavily supplied with near-surface capillary vessels.




It would therefore be desirable and very useful to develop a relatively painless, easy to use blood analyte sensor, capable of performing an accurate and sensitive analysis of the concentration of analytes in a small volume of sample.




It would also be desirable to develop methods for manufacturing small volume electrochemical sensors capable of decreasing the errors that arise from the size of the sensor and the sample.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The sensors of the present invention provide a method for the detection and quantification of an analyte in submicroliter samples. In general, the invention includes a method and sensor for analysis of an analyte in a small volume of sample by, for example, coulometry, amperometry and/or potentiometry. A sensor of the invention preferably utilizes a non-leachable or diffusible redox mediator. The sensor also includes a sample chamber to hold the sample in electrolytic contact with the working electrode. In many instances, the sensor also contains a non-leachable or diffusible second electron transfer agent.




In a preferred embodiment, the working electrode faces a counter electrode, forming a measurement zone within the sample chamber, between the two electrodes, that is sized to contain no more than about 1 μL of sample, preferably no more than about 0.5 μL, more preferably no more than about 0.32 μL, still more preferably no more than about 0.25 μL, and most preferably no more than about 0.1 μL of sample.




In one embodiment of the invention, a sensor, configured for insertion into an electronic meter, is provided with a working electrode and a counter electrode, and a conductive insertion monitor which provides electrical contact with the electronic meter if the sensor is properly inserted into the meter. The conductive insertion monitor is configured and arranged to close an electrical circuit when the sensor is properly inserted into the electronic connector.




In another embodiment of the invention, a sensor is provided with a plurality of contacts, each contact having a contact pad, which is a region for connection with an electronic meter. The plurality of contacts and contact pads are disposed on a substrate having a length and a width, and each contact pad has a contact pad width taken parallel to the width of the substrate. The sum of the contact pad widths is greater than the width of the substrate. In a preferred embodiment, six electrical connections are made with six contact pads on the sensor but in a width that is approximately the width of four contact pads. For example, a working electrode, three counter electrodes (e.g., one counter electrode and two indicator electrodes), and two insertion trace connections each have a contact pad; connection can be made to each of these six contact pads in the same width of the contact pads of the working electrode and three counter electrodes.




The present invention also includes an electrical connector, for providing electrical contact between a sensor and an electrical meter or other device. The electrical connector has a plurality of contact structures, each which has a proximal contact end for electrical connection to a sensor contact, and a distal end for electrical connection to the electrical device. In one embodiment, a plurality of first contact structures extend longitudinally parallel from the distal to the proximal end. Additionally, one or more second contract structures extend longitudinally next to the first contact structures, from the distal end past the proximal end of the first contact structures, and angle toward a longitudinal center line of the connector. Contact to the sensor is then made via the proximal contact ends.




Preferably, the electrical connector has at least two second contact structures extending longitudinally past the proximal end of the first contact structures and angling toward the longitudinal center line of the connector. After the angled or bent portion, the proximal contact ends of the second contact structures of one embodiment make electrical contact with a single conductive surface of a sensor, such as a conductive insertion monitor. In another aspect, the first contact structures can be configured and arranged to contact one or more working and/or counter electrodes of a sensor, and the second contact structures are configured and arranged to contact one or more conductive insertion monitors.




The sensors of the present invention can be configured for side-filling or tip-filling. In addition, in some embodiments, the sensor may be part of an integrated sample acquisition and analyte measurement device. The integrated sample acquisition and analyte measurement device can include the sensor and a skin piercing member, so that the device can be used to pierce the skin of a user to cause flow of a fluid sample, such as blood, that can then be collected by the sensor. In at least some embodiments, the fluid sample can be collected without moving the integrated sample acquisition and analyte measurement device.




In one embodiment, the sensor is connected with an electrical device, to provide a processor coupled to the sensor. The processor is configured and arranged to determine, during electrolysis of a sample in the sample chamber, a series of current values. The processor determines a peak current value from the series of current values. After the current values decrease below a threshold fraction of the peak current values, slope values are determined from the current values and represent a linear function of the logarithm of current values over time. The processor determines, from the slope values, an extrapolation slope. From the extrapolated slope and the measured current values, the processor determines an amount of charge needed to electrolyze the sample and, from that amount of charge, the concentration of the analyte in the sample.




One method of forming a sensor, as described above, includes forming at least one working electrode on a first substrate and forming at least one counter or counter/reference electrode on a second substrate. A spacer layer is disposed on either the first or second substrates. The spacer layer defines a chamber into which a sample can be drawn and held when the sensor is completed. A redox mediator and/or second electron transfer agent can be disposed on the first or second substrate in a region that will be exposed within the sample chamber when the sensor is completed. The first and second substrates are then brought together and spaced apart by the spacer layer with the sample chamber providing access to the at least one working electrode and the at least one counter or counter/reference electrode. In some embodiments, the first and second substrates are portions of a single sheet or continuous web of material. The invention includes particularly efficient and reliable methods for the manufacture of these sensors.




One such efficient and reliable method includes providing an adhesive having first and second surfaces covered with first and second release liners and then making detailed cuts through the first release liner and the adhesive but not through the second release liner. These cuts define one or more sample chamber regions. A portion of the first release liner is removed to expose a portion of the first adhesive surface, which leaves a remaining portion of the first release liner over the sample chamber regions. This exposed first adhesive surface is applied to a first substrate having one or more conductive traces disposed thereon. The second release liner is removed together with the adhesive and the first release liner of the sample chamber regions in order to expose the second adhesive surface. The second adhesive surface is then applied to a second substrate having one or more conductive traces disposed thereon. This method forms a sensor having a sample chamber corresponding to one of the sample chamber regions.




These and various other features which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the attached claims. For a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and objectives obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings and to the accompanying description, in which there is illustrated and described preferred embodiments of the invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals and letters indicate corresponding structure throughout the several views:





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of a first embodiment of an electrochemical sensor in accordance with the present invention having a working electrode and a counter electrode facing each other and having a sample chamber;





FIG. 2

is an exploded view of the sensor shown in

FIG. 1

, the layers illustrated individually;





FIG. 3

is a schematic view of a second embodiment of an electrochemical sensor in accordance with the principles of the present invention having a working electrode and a counter electrode facing each other and having an extended sample chamber;





FIG. 4

is a top view of a third embodiment of an electrochemical sensor in accordance with the principles of the present invention, this sensor includes multiple working electrodes;





FIG. 5A

illustrates a top view of a first substrate with a working electrode for use in a fourth embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 5B

illustrates a bottom view of a second substrate (inverted with respect to

FIG. 5A

) with counter electrodes placement over and opposite the substrate of

FIG. 5A

;





FIG. 5C

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement between the first substrate of FIG.


5


A and the second substrate of

FIG. 5B

;





FIG. 6A

illustrates a top view of a first film with a working electrode for use in a fifth embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 6B

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement on the first film of

FIG. 6A

;





FIG. 6C

illustrates a bottom view of a second film (inverted with respect to

FIGS. 6A and 6B

) with counter electrodes placement over the spacer of FIG.


6


B and first film of

FIG. 6A

;





FIG. 7A

illustrates a top view of a first film with a working electrode for use in a sixth embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 7B

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement on the first film of

FIG. 7A

;





FIG. 7C

illustrates a bottom view of a second film (inverted with respect to

FIGS. 7A and 7B

) with counter electrodes placement over the spacer of FIG.


7


B and first film of

FIG. 7A

;





FIG. 8A

illustrates a top view of a first film with a working electrode for use in a seventh embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 8B

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement on the first film of

FIG. 8A

;





FIG. 8C

illustrates a bottom view of a second film (inverted with respect to

FIGS. 8A and 8B

) with counter electrodes placement over the spacer of FIG.


8


B and first film of

FIG. 8A

;





FIG. 9A

illustrates a top view of a first film with a working electrode for use in a eighth embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 9B

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement on the first film of

FIG. 9A

;





FIG. 9C

illustrates a bottom view of a second film (inverted with respect to

FIGS. 9A and 9B

) with counter electrodes placement over the spacer of FIG.


9


B and first film of

FIG. 9A

;





FIG. 10A

illustrates a top view of a first film with a working electrode for use in a ninth embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 10B

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement on the first film of

FIG. 10A

;





FIG. 10C

illustrates a bottom view of a second film (inverted with respect to

FIGS. 10A and 10B

) with counter electrodes placement over the spacer of FIG.


10


B and first film of

FIG. 10A

;





FIG. 11A

illustrates a top view of a first film with a working electrode for use in a tenth embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 11B

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement on the first film of

FIG. 11A

;





FIG. 11C

illustrates a bottom view of a second film (inverted with respect to

FIGS. 1

A and


11


B) with counter electrodes placement over the spacer of FIG.


11


B and first film of

FIG. 11A

;





FIG. 12A

illustrates a top view of a first film with a working electrode for use in a eleventh embodiment of a sensor according to the invention;





FIG. 12B

illustrates a top view of a spacer for placement on the first film of

FIG. 12A

;





FIG. 12C

illustrates a bottom view of a second film (inverted with respect to

FIGS. 12A and 12B

) with counter electrodes placement over the spacer of FIG.


12


B and first film of

FIG. 12A

;





FIG. 13A

illustrates a top view of one embodiment of a sheet of sensor components, according to the invention;





FIG. 13B

illustrates a top view of another embodiment of a sheet of sensor components, according to the invention;





FIGS. 14A through 14F

illustrate cross sectional views of a sequential process of providing a sample chamber in a spacer layer;





FIG. 14G

is a bottom view of

FIG. 14B

;





FIG. 15A

is a graphical representation of the current over time used to calculate the concentration of an analyte;





FIG. 15B

is a graphical representation of the log of current over time used to calculate the concentration of an analyte;





FIG. 16A

is a top perspective view of a sensor positioned for insertion within an electrical connector device in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 16B

is an exploded view of the electrical connector device of

FIG. 16A

;





FIG. 17A

is a top perspective view of a sensor fully positioned within the electrical connector device of

FIG. 16A

;





FIG. 17B

is an exploded view of the electrical connector device of

FIG. 17A

;





FIG. 18A

is a bottom perspective view of the electrical connector device of

FIGS. 16A and 16B

;





FIG. 18B

is a bottom perspective view of the electrical connector device of

FIGS. 17A and 17B

;





FIGS. 19A through 19L

illustrate examples of suitable conductive pathways between contact pads;





FIG. 20

illustrates a cross-sectional view looking from inside a connector to a sensor of the invention disposed within the connector; and





FIG. 21

illustrates a perspective view of a ring for use with a lancet device.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




As used herein, the following definitions define the stated term:




An “air-oxidizable mediator” is a redox mediator that is oxidized by air, preferably so that at least 90% of the mediator is in an oxidized state upon storage in air either as a solid or as a liquid during a period of time, for example, one month or less, and, preferably, one week or less, and, more preferably, one day or less.




“Amperometry” includes steady-state amperometry, chronoamperometry, and Cottrell-type measurements.




A “biological fluid” is any body fluid in which the analyte can be measured, for example, blood (which includes whole blood and its cell-free components, such as, plasma and serum), interstitial fluid, dermal fluid, sweat, tears, urine and saliva.




“Coulometry” is the determination of charge passed or projected to pass during complete or nearly complete electrolysis of the analyte, either directly on the electrode or through one or more electron transfer agents. The charge is determined by measurement of charge passed during partial or nearly complete electrolysis of the analyte or, more often, by multiple measurements during the electrolysis of a decaying current and elapsed time. The decaying current results from the decline in the concentration of the electrolyzed species caused by the electrolysis.




A “counter electrode” refers to one or more electrodes paired with the working electrode, through which passes an electrochemical current equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to the current passed through the working electrode. The term “counter electrode” is meant to include counter electrodes which also function as reference electrodes (i.e. a counter/reference electrode) unless the description provides that a “counter electrode” excludes a reference or counter/reference electrode.




An “effective diffusion coefficient” is the diffusion coefficient characterizing transport of a substance, for example, an analyte, an enzyme, or a redox mediator, in the volume between the electrodes of the electrochemical cell. In at least some instances, the cell volume may be occupied by more than one medium (e.g., the sample fluid and a polymer film). Diffusion of a substance through each medium may occur at a different rate. The effective diffusion coefficient corresponds to a diffusion rate through this multiple-media volume and is typically different than the diffusion coefficient for the substance in a cell filled solely with sample fluid.




An “electrochemical sensor” is a device configured to detect the presence of and/or measure the concentration of an analyte via electrochemical oxidation and reduction reactions. These reactions are transduced to an electrical signal that can be correlated to an amount or concentration of analyte.




“Electrolysis” is the electrooxidation or electroreduction of a compound either directly at an electrode or via one or more electron transfer agents (e.g., redox mediators and/or enzymes).




The term “facing electrodes” refers to a configuration of the working and counter electrodes in which the working surface of the working electrode is disposed in approximate opposition to a surface of the counter electrode. In at least some instances, the distance between the working and counter electrodes is less than the width of the working surface of the working electrode.




A compound is “immobilized” on a surface when it is entrapped on or chemically bound to the surface.




An “indicator electrode” is an electrode that detects partial or complete filling of a sample chamber and/or measurement zone.




A “layer” is one or more layers.




The “measurement zone” is defined herein as a region of the sample chamber sized to contain only that portion of the sample that is to be interrogated during an analyte assay.




A “non-diffusible,” “non-leachable,” or “non-releasable” compound is a compound which does not substantially diffuse away from the working surface of the working electrode for the duration of the analyte assay.




The “potential of the counter/reference electrode” is the half cell potential of the reference electrode or counter/reference electrode of the cell when the solution in the cell is 0.1 M NaCl solution at pH7.




A “redox mediator” is an electron transfer agent for carrying electrons between the analyte and the working electrode, either directly, or via a second electron transfer agent.




A “reference electrode” includes a reference electrode that also functions as a counter electrode (i.e., a counter/reference electrode) unless the description provides that a “reference electrode” excludes a counter/reference electrode.




A “second electron transfer agent” is a molecule that carries electrons between a redox mediator and the analyte.




A “surface in the sample chamber” is a surface of a working electrode, counter electrode, counter/reference electrode, reference electrode, indicator electrode, a spacer, or any other surface bounding the sample chamber.




A “working electrode” is an electrode at which analyte is electrooxidized or electroreduced with or without the agency of a redox mediator.




A “working surface” is the portion of a working electrode that is covered with non-leachable redox mediator and exposed to the sample, or, if the redox mediator is diffusible, a “working surface” is the portion of the working electrode that is exposed to the sample.




The small volume, in vitro analyte sensors of the present invention are designed to measure the concentration of an analyte in a portion of a sample having a volume no more than about 1 μL, preferably no more than about 0.5 μL, more preferably no more than about 0.32 μL, still more preferably no more than about 0.25 μL, and most preferably no more than about 0.1 μL of sample.




The analyte of interest is typically provided in a solution or biological fluid, such as blood or serum.




Referring to the Drawings in general, and in particular

FIGS. 1 and 2

, a small volume, in vitro electrochemical sensor


20


of the invention generally includes a working electrode


22


on a first substrate


32


, a counter (or counter/reference) electrode


24


on a second substrate


34


, and a sample chamber


26


. The sample chamber


26


is configured so that when a sample is provided in the chamber, the sample is in electrolytic contact with both the working electrode


22


, the counter electrode


24


and any reference electrodes or indicator electrodes that may be present. This allows electrical current to flow between the electrodes to effect the electrolysis (electrooxidation or electroreduction) of the analyte. A spacer


33


is positioned between first substrate


32


and second substrate


34


to provide a spacing between electrodes


22


,


24


and to provide sample chamber


26


in which the sample to be evaluated is housed.




Working Electrode




The working electrode


22


may be formed from a molded carbon fiber composite or it may include an inert non-conducting base material, such as polyester, upon which a suitable conducting layer is deposited. The conducting layer typically has relatively low electrical resistance and is typically electrochemically inert over the potential range of the sensor during operation. Suitable conducting layers include gold, carbon, platinum, ruthenium dioxide, palladium, and conductive epoxies, such as, for example, ECCOCOAT CT5079-3 Carbon-Filled Conductive Epoxy Coating (available from W.R. Grace Company, Woburn, Mass.), as well as other non-corroding materials known to those skilled in the art. The electrode (e.g., the conducting layer) is deposited on the surface of the inert material by methods such as vapor deposition or printing. Preferably, the electrode is printed onto the base material.




The inert non-conducting base material, is also referred to as a substrate, base, or the like. This base material is typically an electrically non-conducting material, e.g., any insulating material, that is not capable of carrying electric charge or current. Examples of materials usable as the base material for sensors of the present invention include polyesters, polyethylene (both high density and low density), polyethylene terephthalate, polycarbonate, vinyls, and the like. The base material can be treated with a primer or other such coating to improve the adhesion of the electrodes thereon.




A tab


23


′ can be provided on the end of the working electrode


22


for easy connection of the electrode to external electronics (not shown) such as a voltage source or current measuring equipment. Contact pad


23


, which is connected to working electrode


22


, such as an extension from the working electrode, can be positioned on tab


23


′.




To prevent electrochemical reactions from occurring on portions of the working electrode not coated by the mediator, when a non-leachable mediator is used, a dielectric or other insulating material can be deposited on the electrode over, under, or surrounding the region with the redox mediator. Suitable dielectric materials include waxes and non-conducting organic polymers, such as polyethylene. The dielectric material can also cover a portion of the redox mediator on the electrode. The covered portion of the redox mediator will not contact the sample, and, therefore, will not be a part of the electrode's working surface.




Sensing Chemistry




In addition to the working electrode


22


, sensing chemistry materials are provided in the sample chamber


26


for the analysis of the analyte. This sensing chemistry preferably includes a redox mediator and a second electron transfer mediator, although in some instances, one or the other may be used alone. The redox mediator and second electron transfer agent can be independently diffusible or non-leachable (i.e., non-diffusible) such that either or both may be diffusible or non-leachable. Placement of sensor chemistry components can depend on whether they are diffusible or non-leachable. For example, non-leachable and/or diffusible component(s) typically form a sensing layer on the working electrode. Alternatively, one or more diffusible components can be disposed on any surface in the sample chamber prior to the introduction of the sample. As another example, one or more diffusible component(s) are placed in the sample prior to introduction of the sample into the sensor.




If the redox mediator is non-leachable, then the non-leachable redox mediator is typically disposed on the working electrode


22


as a sensing layer. In an embodiment having a redox mediator and a second electron transfer agent, if the redox mediator and second electron transfer agent are both non-leachable, then both of the non-leachable components are disposed on the working electrode


22


as a sensing layer.




If, for example, the second electron transfer agent is diffusible and the redox mediator is non-leachable, then at least the redox mediator is disposed on the working electrode


22


as a sensing layer. The diffusible second electron transfer agent need not be disposed on a sensing layer of the working electrode, but can be disposed on any surface of the sample chamber, including within the redox mediator sensing layer, or can be placed in the sample. If the redox mediator is diffusible, then the redox mediator can be disposed on any surface of the sample chamber or can be placed in the sample. If both the redox mediator and second electron transfer agent are diffusible, then the diffusible components can be independently or jointly disposed on any surface of the sample chamber and/or placed in the sample (i.e., each diffusible component need not be disposed on the same surface of the sample chamber or placed in the sample).




The redox mediator, whether it is diffusible or non-leachable, mediates a current between the working electrode


22


and the analyte and enables the electrochemical analysis of molecules which may not be suited for direct electrochemical reaction on an electrode. The mediator functions as an electron transfer agent between the electrode and the analyte.




Analytes that can be interrogated include, for example, glucose, acetyl choline, amylase, bilirubin, cholesterol, chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase (e.g., CK-MB), creatine, DNA, fructosamine, glucose, glutamine, growth hormones, hormones, ketones, lactate, peroxide, prostate-specific antigen, prothrombin, RNA, thyroid stimulating hormone, and troponin. The concentration of analytes such as drugs or medication, such as, for example, antibiotics (e.g., gentamicin, vancomycin, and the like), digitoxin, digoxin, drugs of abuse, theophylline, and warfarin, can also be determined. Assays suitable for determining the concentration of DNA and/or RNA are disclosed in U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 09/138,888 and 09/145,776 and described in PCT Application PCT/US99/14460, all which are incorporated herein by reference.




Redox Mediators




Although any organic or organometallic redox species can be used as a redox mediator, one type of suitable redox mediator is a transition metal compound or complex. Examples of suitable transition metal compounds or complexes include osmium, ruthenium, iron, and cobalt compounds or complexes. In these complexes, the transition metal is coordinatively bound to one or more ligands. The ligands are typically mono-, di-, tri-, or tetradentate. The most preferred ligands are heterocyclic nitrogen compounds, such as, for example, pyridine and/or imidazole derivatives. Multidentate ligands may include multiple pyridine and/or imidazole rings. Alternatively, metallocene derivatives, such as, for example, ferrocene, can be used. An example of one mediator is [Os(4-(N-(6-aminohexyl)aminobipyridine)(1,1′-dimethyl-2,2′-biimidazole)


2


]Cl


3


.




The redox mediators can be diffusible redox mediators or non-leachable redox mediators, such as non-leachable redox polymers. For additional information on redox mediators, see, for example, U.S. patent application Serial No. 09/295,962, filed Apr. 21, 1999, and PCT published application WO 98/35225, both which are incorporated herein by reference.




Second Electron Transfer Agent




In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the sensor includes a redox mediator and a second electron transfer agent which is capable of transferring electrons to or from the redox mediator and the analyte. The second electron transfer agent can be diffusible or can be non-leachable (e.g., entrapped in or coordinatively, covalently, or ionically bound to a redox polymer). One example of a suitable second electron transfer agent is an enzyme which catalyzes a reaction of the analyte. For example, a glucose oxidase or glucose dehydrogenase, such as pyrroloquinoline quinone glucose dehydrogenase (PQQ), is used when the analyte is glucose. A lactate oxidase fills this role when the analyte is lactate. Other enzymes can be used for other analytes.




Counter Electrode




Counter electrode


24


, as illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, can be constructed in a manner similar to working electrode


22


. Counter electrode


24


may also be a counter/reference electrode. Alternatively, a separate reference electrode may be provided in contact with the sample chamber. Suitable materials for the counter/reference or reference electrode include, for example, Ag/AgCl or Ag/AgBr printed on a non-conducting base material or silver chloride on a silver metal base. The same materials and methods may be used to make the counter electrode as are available for constructing the working electrode


22


, although different materials and methods may also be used. Preferably, the counter or counter/reference electrode is printed on an insulating base material. A tab


25


′, on which contact pad


25


is disposed, can be provided for making convenient connection to the external electronics (not shown), such as a coulometer, potentiostat, or other measuring device.




Optionally, a non-conductive filler material, such as a non-conductive ink, can be formed adjacent a counter electrode, or between multiple counter electrodes to provide a planar surface along the path of travel of the sample fluid in the sample chamber. The non-conductive filler material preferably creates a smooth surface to facilitate filling of the sample chamber by capillary action and/or for reducing the likelihood that air bubbles will become entrapped near the counter electrodes. This non-conductive material can be colored or colorless and may be formed on the substrate by printing or other techniques. The non-conductive material may be deposited prior to or subsequent to the formation of the counter electrode. In one embodiment, a non-conductive ink is used to fill in the area between multiple 12.3 micrometer (0.5 mil) thick counter electrodes. In another embodiment, a non-conductive ink is used to fill the area between multiple 6.4 micrometer (0.25 mil) thick counter electrodes. Generally, no filler ink is needed for thickness less about 6.4 micrometers, and in some sensor designs, no filler ink is needed for 6.4 micrometer thick counter electrodes.




Electrode Configuration




In one embodiment of the invention, working electrode


22


and counter electrode


24


are disposed opposite to and facing each other to form a facing electrode pair as depicted in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. In this preferred configuration, the sample chamber


26


is typically disposed between the two electrodes. For this facing electrode configuration, it is preferred that the electrodes are separated by a distance of no more than about 0.2 mm (e.g., at least one portion of the working electrode is separated from one portion of the counter electrode by no more than 200 μm), preferably no more than 100 μm, and most preferably no more than 50 μm.




The electrodes need not be directly opposing each other; they may be slightly offset. Furthermore, the two electrodes need not be the same size. Preferably, the working electrode


22


extends the width of sensor


20


and counter electrode


24


is a portion or all of that width. Either of working electrode


22


or counter electrode


24


may include more than one electrode, such as shown in

FIG. 4

(as counter electrodes


324


,


344


) and in

FIG. 5B

(as counter electrodes


424


,


441


,


442


). Counter electrode


24


can also be formed with tines in a comb shape. Other configurations of both the counter electrode and working electrode are within the scope of the invention. However, for this particular embodiment, the separation distance between at least one portion of the working electrode and some portion of the counter electrode preferably does not exceed the limits specified hereinabove.




In another embodiment of the invention, the working and counter electrodes are coplanar. In this case, the sample chamber is in contact with both electrodes and is bounded on the side opposite the electrodes by a non-conducting inert base or substrate. Suitable materials for the inert base include non-conducting materials such as polyester.




Other configurations of the inventive sensors are also possible. For example, the two electrodes can be formed on surfaces that make an angle to each other. One such configuration would have the electrodes on surfaces that form a right angle. Another possible configuration has the electrodes on a curved surface such as the interior of a tube. For example, the working and counter electrodes can be arranged so that they face each other from opposite sides of the tube. This is another example of a facing electrode pair. Alternatively, the electrodes can be placed near each other on the tube wall (e.g., one on top of the other or side-by-side). In any configuration, the two electrodes must be configured so that they do not make direct electrical contact with each other, to prevent shorting of the electrochemical sensor.




Referring again to

FIGS. 1 and 2

, the electrodes


22


,


24


extend from the sample chamber


26


to the other end of the sensor


20


as electrode extensions called “traces”. Each trace provides a contact pad


23


,


25


for providing electrical connection to a meter or other device to allow for data and measurement collection, as will be described later. Preferably, each contact pad


23


,


25


is positioned on a tab


23


′,


25


′ that extends from each non-conducting base substrate


32


,


34


. In one embodiment, a tab has more than one contact pad positioned thereon. In a second embodiment, a single contact pad is used to provide a connection to one or more electrodes; that is, multiple electrodes are coupled together and are connected via one contact pad.




A spacer


33


can be used to keep the electrodes apart when the electrodes face each other as depicted in

FIGS. 1 and 2

; spacer


33


is clearly seen in FIG.


2


. The spacer is typically constructed from an inert non-conducting material such as pressure-sensitive adhesive, polyester, Mylar™, Kevlar™ or any other strong, thin polymer film, or, alternatively, a thin polymer film such as a Teflon™ film, chosen for its chemical inertness. In addition to preventing contact between the electrodes, the spacer


33


can function as a portion of the boundary for the sample chamber


26


. Other spacers include layers of adhesive and double-sided adhesive tape (e.g., a carrier film with adhesive on opposing sides of the film). Adhesive may be applied, for example by coating, onto a polymeric material to provide spacer


33


.




Sample Chamber




The sample chamber


26


is typically defined by a combination of the electrodes


22


,


24


, the substrates


32


,


34


, and a spacer


33


as shown in

FIGS. 1 and 2

. A measurement zone is contained within this sample chamber and is the region of the sample chamber that contains only that portion of the sample that is interrogated during the analyte assay. In the embodiment of the invention illustrated in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, sample chamber


26


is the space between the two electrodes


22


,


24


and their non-conductive base substrates


32


,


34


, bounded by spacer


33


. In this embodiment, the sample chamber has a volume that is preferably no more than about 1 μL, more preferably no more than about 0.32 μL, and still more preferably no more than about 0.25 μL.




In the embodiment of the invention depicted in

FIGS. 1 and 2

, the measurement zone has a volume that is approximately equal to the volume of the sample chamber. In a preferred embodiment the measurement zone includes 80% of the sample chamber, 90% in a more preferred embodiment, and about 100% in a most preferred embodiment.




In another embodiment of the invention, shown in

FIG. 3

, sensor


220


has a working electrode


222


on non-conducting substrate base


232


, a counter electrode


224


on non-conducting substrate base


234


, and a spacer


233


therebetween. A contact pad


223


extends from working electrode


222


, and likewise, a contact pad


225


extends from counter electrode


224


. Sample chamber


226


(defined by base


232


,


234


and spacer


233


) extends the length of sensor


220


and includes much more space than the region proximate electrodes


222


,


224


. In this embodiment, the measurement zone, corresponding to the region containing the portion of the sample which will be interrogated, is the portion of sample chamber


226


bounded by the working surface of the working electrode


222


and counter electrode


224


. In this embodiment, the measurement zone has a volume that is preferably no more than about 1 μL, more preferably no more than about 0.32 μL, still more preferably no more than about 0.25 μL, and most preferably no more than about 0.1 μL of sample.




In both of the embodiments discussed above, the thickness of the sample chamber and of the measurement zone correspond typically to the thickness of spacer


33


,


233


(e.g., the distance between the electrodes in

FIGS. 2 and 3

, or the distance between the electrodes and the inert base in an embodiment where the electrodes are co-planar). The spacer can be, for example, an adhesive or double-sided adhesive tape or film. Examples of useable adhesives include urethanes, acrylates, acrylics, latexes, rubbers, and other known adhesive materials. Preferably, this thickness is small to promote rapid electrolysis of the analyte, as more of the sample will be in contact with the electrode surface for a given sample volume. In addition, a thin sample chamber helps to reduce errors from diffusion of analyte into the measurement zone from other portions of the sample chamber during the analyte assay, because diffusion time is long relative to the measurement time. Typically, the thickness of the sample chamber is between about 50 and about 200 micrometers.




Sorbent Material




The sample chamber can be empty before the sample is placed in the chamber, or, in some embodiments, the sample chamber can include a sorbent material (shown in

FIG. 3

as sorbent


50


) to sorb and hold a fluid sample during the measurement process. Suitable sorbent materials include polyester, nylon, cellulose, and cellulose derivatives such as nitrocellulose. The sorbent material facilitates the uptake of small volume samples by a wicking action which can complement or, preferably, replace any capillary action of the sample chamber. In addition to or alternatively, a portion or the entirety of the wall of the sample chamber may be coated by a surfactant, which is intended to lower the surface tension of the fluid sample and improve fluid flow within the sample chamber. An example of a useable surfactant is available under the tradename “Zonyl FSO” from Dupont of Wilmington, Del.




Methods other than the wicking action of a sorbent can be used to transport the sample into the sample chamber or measurement zone. Examples of such methods for transport include the application of pressure on a sample to push it into the sample chamber, the creation of a vacuum by a pump or other vacuum-producing method in the sample chamber to pull the sample into the chamber, capillary action due to interfacial tension of the sample with the walls of a thin sample chamber, as well as the wicking action of a sorbent material.




The entire sensor assembly is held firmly together to ensure that the sample remains in contact with the electrodes and that the sample chamber and measurement zone maintain the same volume. This is an important consideration in the coulometric analysis of a sample, where measurement of a defined sample volume is needed.




Alternative Sensor Designs





FIGS. 4 through 12

illustrate alternative sensor designs, both tip-filling and side-filling. Referring to

FIG. 4

, a sensor


320


has a working electrode


322


, a counter electrode


324


, a second counter electrode


344


(which may provide a fill indicator function, as described below), and a sample chamber


326


extending along at least a portion of the length of sensor


320


and optionally including a sorbent


350


.





FIG. 5A through 5C

illustrate three layers that when assembled, provide a preferred embodiment of a sensor.

FIG. 5A

has a working electrode


422


on substrate


432


. Working electrode


422


has a trace


453


extending from sample chamber


426


to tab


423


′ on which is contact pad


423


; contact pad


423


connects the sensor to a meter or other measurement equipment.

FIG. 5B

, (inverted with respect to

FIG. 5A

to show the electrode side up), has a counter electrode


424


on substrate


434


, and also includes a first indicator electrode


441


and a second indicator electrode


442


. Counter electrode


424


has a trace


454


, first indicator electrode


441


has trace


451


, and second indicator electrode


442


has trace


452


, that end at contact pads


425


,


443


,


444


, respectively, on tab


425


′. Spacer


433


in

FIG. 5C

defines sample chamber


426


and provides spacing between the electrodes when the two substrates


432


,


434


are positioned opposite and facing one another.





FIGS. 6A through 6C

also illustrate three layers that, when assembled, provide a sensor. In

FIG. 6A

, a working electrode


502


is formed on first substrate


500


. The working electrode


502


includes a contact pad


503


for connection with external electronics; this contact pad


503


is connected to working electrode


502


by trace


552


. A spacer


504


, shown in

FIG. 6B

, such as a layer of adhesive or a double-sided tape defines a channel


506


to produce a sample chamber for the sensor. Two counter (or counter/reference) electrodes


510


,


512


are formed on a second substrate


508


, as shown in

FIG. 6C

(inverted with respect to

FIG. 6A

to show the electrode side up). This multiple counter electrode arrangement can provide a fill indicator function, using counter electrode


512


, as described below. Each counter electrode


510


,


512


has a contact region or pad


511


,


513


for connection with external electronics; these contact pads


511


,


513


are connected to counter electrodes


510


,


512


by traces


551


,


553


. The second substrate


508


is inverted and placed over the first substrate


500


, with the spacer


504


between, so that the working electrode


502


and the two counter electrodes


510


,


512


are facing in the region of the channel


506


.




In some instances, the counter electrode


510


nearest an entrance


514


(

FIG. 6B

) of the channel


506


has a surface area within the sample chamber that is at least two times larger than the other counter electrode


512


, and may be at least five or ten times larger. The non-leachable or diffusible redox mediator and/or second electron transfer agent can be provided on either the first or second substrates


500


,


508


in a region corresponding to the channel


506


, as described above.




The working electrode and counter electrodes can be formed to cover the entire channel region (except for a small space between the two counter electrodes). In this embodiment, the sample chamber and measurement zone are effectively the same and have the same volume. In other embodiments, the measurement zone has, for example, 80% or 90% of the volume of the sample chamber. It will be understood that similar sensors could be made using one counter electrode or three or more counter electrodes. It will also be understood that multiple working electrodes may also be provided on the sensor.





FIGS. 7A

,


7


B and


7


C illustrate a side-filling sensor arrangement.

FIG. 7A

shows a first substrate


520


with a working electrode


522


.

FIG. 7B

illustrates a spacer


524


defining a channel


526


.

FIG. 7C

(inverted with respect to

FIGS. 7A and 7B

) illustrate a second substrate


528


with three counter (or counter/reference) electrodes


530


,


532


,


534


. This multiple counter electrode arrangement can provide a fill indicator function, as described below. An indentation


536


,


538


or recessed or indented portion can be formed at either edge of the opening to channel


526


to facilitate the drawing of fluid into the sensor. This configuration can aid in wicking or capillary filling of the channel (i.e., sample chamber). This configuration can also reduce the likelihood that the user will inadvertently block the channel during collection of the sample, which could occur by pressing the tip of the sensor edgewise against the skin.





FIGS. 8A

,


8


B, and


8


C illustrate another example of a side-filling sensor arrangement.

FIG. 8A

illustrates a first substrate


540


with a working electrode


542


.

FIG. 8B

illustrates a spacer


544


defining a channel


546


.

FIG. 8C

(inverted with respect to

FIGS. 8A and 8B

) illustrates a second substrate


548


with three counter (or counter/reference) electrodes


550


,


552


,


554


.





FIGS. 9A

,


9


B, and


9


C illustrate another example of a tip-filling sensor arrangement.

FIG. 9A

illustrates a first substrate


560


with a working electrode


562


.

FIG. 9B

illustrates a spacer


564


defining a channel


566


.

FIG. 9C

(inverted with respect to

FIGS. 9A and 9B

) illustrates a second thin film substrate


568


with two counter (or counter/reference) electrodes


570


,


572


. This multiple counter electrode arrangement can provide a fill indicator function, as described below. A vent hole


574


(indicated as a shaded region in

FIG. 9C

) is provided through the second substrate. In the illustrated embodiment, this vent hole


574


is made through only the substrate


568


that carries the counter electrode(s) and, optionally, the spacer


564


. In this embodiment, the vent hole can be formed by, for example, die cutting a portion of the substrate. This die cut can remove a portion of at least one counter electrode, but a sufficient amount of the counter electrode should remain for contact with the sample in the channel and for electrical connection to a contact at the other end of the sensor. In another embodiment, the vent hole


574


can be made through all of the layers or through the first substrate and not the second substrate.




Another embodiment is illustrated in

FIGS. 10A

,


10


B, and


10


C, with a different shape. This sensor includes a first substrate


579


with at least one working electrode


580


, as illustrated in FIG.


10


A. The sensor also includes a spacer


581


with a channel


582


formed in the spacer


581


, as shown in FIG.


10


B. The sensor further includes a second substrate


583


with two counter electrodes


584


,


585


, as shown in

FIG. 10C

(inverted with respect to FIGS.


10


A and


10


B). A venting aperture


586


is cut typically through all of the layers and extends from a side of the sensor. In some embodiments, the venting aperture and the front portion


587


of the sensor are simultaneously cut with a reproducible distance between the venting aperture and the front portion


587


of the sensor to provide a reproducible length for the channel


582


and the working electrode


580


. This tip-filling sensor arrangement optionally includes an indentation


588


or recessed or indented portion that can be formed at the filling opening of the channel


582


to facilitate the drawing of fluid into the sensor.





FIGS. 11A

,


11


B, and


11


C illustrate another example of a side-filling sensor arrangement.

FIG. 11A

illustrates a first substrate


640


with a working electrode


642


.

FIG. 11B

illustrates a spacer


644


defining a channel


646


.

FIG. 11C

(inverted with respect to

FIGS. 11A and 11B

) illustrates a second substrate


648


with three counter (or counter/reference) electrodes


650


,


652


,


654


. This multiple counter electrode arrangement can provide a fill indicator function, as described below. The length of the channel


646


is typically defined by the two parallel cuts along the sides


656


,


658


of the sensors.




Because of the straight sides, these sensors (and also those shown in

FIGS. 1

,


2


and


5


) can be manufactured adjacent to one another, as illustrated in FIG.


13


A. Such positioning during manufacture produces less waste material. Another optional processing advantage of the adjacent sensor manufacturing process is that the redox mediator and/or second electron transfer agent can be readily disposed in the channel by striping a continuous stream of these components along a row or column of adjacent sensors. This can result in better efficiency and less waste of expensive reagents such as the redox mediator and/or second electron transfer agent, as compared to other techniques, such as individually placing these components within the individual channels.





FIGS. 12A

,


12


B, and


12


C illustrate another sensor configuration. This sensor includes a first substrate


600


with at least one working electrode


602


, as illustrated in FIG.


12


A. The sensor also includes a spacer


604


with a channel


606


formed in the spacer


604


, as shown in FIG.


12


B. The sensor further includes a second substrate


608


with two counter electrodes


610


,


612


, as shown in

FIG. 12C

(inverted with respect to FIGS.


12


A and


12


B). This multiple counter electrode arrangement may provide a fill indicator function, as described below. The sensor can also include, for example, an indicator, such as a slot


614


or an extension


616


from the body of the sensor that indicates to the user which side of the sensor should be placed adjacent to the sample. Surface printing can also or alternatively be applied to the sensor to act as an indicator. Some indication mechanism can be particularly important where the sensor reading is only correct when the sample enters from a particular side.




Multiple Electrode Sensors and Calibration Thereof




Multiple electrode sensors can be used for a variety of reasons. For example, multiple electrodes can be used to test a variety of analytes using a single sample. One embodiment with multiple electrodes has one or more sample chambers, each of which contains one or more working electrodes, with each working electrode defining a different measurement zone. If the redox mediator is non-leachable, one or more of the working electrodes can have the appropriate chemical reagents, for example, an appropriate enzyme, to test a first analyte and one or more of the remaining working electrodes can have the appropriate chemical reagents to test a second analyte, and so on. For example, a multiple electrode sensor might include a working electrode having glucose oxidase disposed thereon to determine glucose concentration and another working electrode can have lactate oxidase disposed thereon to determine lactate concentration.




Multiple electrodes could also be used to improve the precision of the resulting readings. The measurements from each of the working electrodes (all of which are detecting the same analyte) can be averaged or otherwise combined together to obtain a more precise or reliable reading. In some cases, measurements could be rejected if the difference between the value and the average exceeds a threshold limit. This threshold limit could be, for example, determined based on a statistical parameter, such as the standard deviation of the averaged measurements. The average could then be recalculated while omitting the rejected values. In addition to using multiple electrode sensors to increase precision, multiple measurements could be made at each electrode and averaged together to increase precision. This technique could also be used with a single electrode sensor to increase precision.




One example of a multiple electrode sensor that can be used to accurately determine the volume of the measurement zones of the electrode pairs and that is also useful in reducing noise is presented herein. In this example, one of the working electrodes is prepared with a non-leachable redox mediator and a non-leachable second electron transfer agent (e.g., an enzyme). Another working electrode includes non-leachable redox mediator, but no second electron transfer agent on the electrode. An optional third working electrode has no redox mediator and no second electron transfer agent bound to the electrode. A similar configuration can be constructed using diffusible redox mediator and/or diffusible second electron transfer agent although diffusible components are not limited to being disposed on the working electrode. Preferably, the distance between the working electrodes is sufficient that redox mediator and/or enzyme do not substantially diffuse between electrodes within the measurement period (e.g., in the time period from introduction of the same sample into the sample chamber to the end of the measurement).




The sensor error caused by the redox mediator being in a non-uniform oxidation state prior to the introduction of the sample can be measured by concurrently electrolyzing the sample in the measurement zones that are proximate working and counter electrodes. At the first working electrode, the analyte is electrolyzed to provide the sample signal. At the second working electrode, the analyte is not electrolyzed because of the absence of the second electron transfer agent (assuming that a second electron transfer agent is necessary). However, a charge will pass (and a current will flow) due to the electrolysis of the redox mediator that was in a mixed oxidation state (i.e., some redox centers in the reduced state and some in the oxidized state) prior to the introduction of the sample and/or the shuttling of a diffusible redox mediator between the working electrode and the counter electrode. The small charge passed using this second working electrode can be subtracted from the charge passed using the first electrode pair to substantially remove the error due to the oxidation state of the redox mediator and/or to remove the background current caused by a diffusible redox mediator. This procedure also reduces the error associated with other electrolyzed interferents, such as ascorbate, urate, and acetaminophen, as well as errors associated with capacitive charging and faradaic currents.




The thickness of the sample chamber can be determined by measuring the capacitance, preferably in the absence of any fluid, between an electrode and its corresponding counter electrode. The capacitance of an electrode pair depends on the surface area of the electrodes, the interelectrode spacing, and the dielectric constant of the material between the plates. The dielectric constant of air is unity which typically means that the capacitance of this electrode configuration is a few picofarads (or about 100-1000 picofarads if there is fluid between the electrode and counter electrode given that the dielectric constant for most biological fluids is approximately 75). Thus, since the surface area of the electrodes are known, measurement of the capacitance of the electrode pair allows for the determination of the thickness of the measurement zone to within about 1-5%.




Other electrode configurations can also use these techniques (i.e., capacitance measurements and coulometric measurements in the absence of a critical component) to reduce background noise and error due to interferents and imprecise knowledge of the volume of the interrogated sample. Protocols involving one or more working electrode(s) and counter electrode(s) and one or more of the measurements described above can be developed and are within the scope of the invention. For example, only one electrode pair is needed for the capacitance measurements, however, additional electrodes can be used for convenience.




Fill Indicator




When using a sample chamber that is filled with 1 μL or less of fluid, it is often desirable to be able to determine when the sample chamber is filled.

FIGS. 6A through 6C

illustrate a sensor having a fill indicator structure. In particular,

FIG. 6A

illustrates a first substrate


500


upon which a working electrode


502


is printed. A spacer


504


(FIG.


6


B), such as, for example, a layer of adhesive or a double-sided tape, is formed over the first substrate


500


and working electrode


502


with a channel


506


formed in the layer to provide a sample chamber. A second substrate


508


is printed with two counter electrodes


510


,


512


, as shown in

FIG. 6C

(inverted with respect to

FIGS. 6A and 6B

to show the electrode side up). Preferably, the counter electrode


510


nearest an entrance


514


of the channel


506


has a surface area within the sample chamber that is at least two times larger than the other counter electrode


512


, and preferably at least five or ten times larger.




The sensor can be indicated as filled, or substantially filled, by observing a signal between the second counter electrode


512


and the working electrode


502


as the sensor fills with fluid. When fluid reaches the second counter electrode


512


, the signal from that counter electrode will change. Suitable signals for observing include, for example, voltage, current, resistance, impedance, or capacitance between the second counter electrode


512


and the working electrode


502


. Alternatively, the sensor can be observed after filling to determine if a value of the signal (e.g., voltage, current, resistance, impedance, or capacitance) has been reached indicating that the sample chamber is filled.




In alternative embodiments, the counter electrode or working electrode can be divided into two or more parts and the signals from the respective parts observed to determine whether the sensor has been filled. In one example, the working electrode is in a facing relationship with the counter electrode and the indicator electrode. In another example, the counter electrode, working electrode, and indicator electrode are not in a facing relationship, but are, for example, side-by-side. Typically, the indicator electrode is further downstream from a sample inlet port than the working electrode and counter electrode.




For side-fill sensors, such as those illustrated in

FIGS. 5

,


7


,


8


and


11


, an indicator electrode can be disposed on each side of the primary counter electrode. This permits the user to fill the sample chamber from either the left or right side with an indicator electrode disposed further upstream. This three-electrode configuration is not necessary. Side-fill sensors can also have a single indicator electrode and, preferably, some indication as to which side should be placed in contact with the sample fluid.




Alternately or additionally, two indicator electrodes, used in combination with one counter/reference electrode, detect when the sample chamber begins to fill and when the sample chamber has been filled to prevent partial filling of the sample chamber. The two indicator electrodes are optionally held at a different potential than the counter/reference electrode. The start and completion of filling of the sample chamber is indicated by the flow of current between the indicator and counter/reference electrodes.




In other instances, the potential of each of the counter/reference electrodes may be the same. When the potential at all three counter/reference electrodes is the same, for example, 0 volts, then as the measurement zone begins to fill, the fluid allows for electrical current flowt between a working electrode and the first counter/reference electrode, causing a current at the first counter/reference electrode due to the reaction of the analyte with the enzyme and the mediator. When the fluid reaches the third counter/reference electrode, another current may be measured similar to the first counter/reference electrode indicating that the measurement zone is full. When the measurement zone is full, the three counter/reference electrodes are optionally shorted together or their signals can be added or otherwise combined.




The indicator electrode can also be used to improve the precision of the analyte measurements. The indicator electrode may operate as a working electrode or as a counter electrode or counter/reference electrode. In the embodiment of

FIGS. 6A through 6C

, the indicator electrode


512


can act as a second counter or counter/reference electrode with respect to the working electrode


502


. Measurements from the indicator electrode/working electrode can be combined (for example, added or averaged) with those from the first counter/reference electrode/working electrode to obtain more accurate measurements. In one embodiment, the indicator electrode operates as a second working electrode with the counter electrode or counter/reference electrode. In another embodiment, the indicator electrode operates as a second working electrode with a second counter electrode or counter/reference electrode. In still another embodiment, the indicator electrode operates as a second counter electrode or counter/reference electrode with a second working electrode.




The sensor or a sensor reader can include a sign (e.g., a visual sign or auditory signal) that is activated in response to the indicator electrode to alert the user that the measurement zone has been filled. The sensor or a sensor reader can be configured to initiate a reading when the indicator electrode indicates that the measurement zone has been filled with or without alerting the user. The reading can be initiated, for example, by applying a potential between the working electrode and the counter electrode and beginning to monitor the signals generated at the working electrode.




General Method for Manufacturing Sensors




Referring now to

FIGS. 13A and 13B

, one example of a method for making thin film sensors is described with respect to the sensor arrangement displayed in

FIGS. 5A through 5C

, although this method can be used to make a variety of other sensor arrangements, including those described before. When the three layers of

FIGS. 5A through 5C

are assembled, a sensor


420


is formed.




In

FIGS. 13A and 13B

, a substrate


1000


, such as a plastic substrate, is moving in the direction indicated by the arrow. The substrate


1000


can be an individual sheet or a continuous roll on a web. Multiple sensors


420


can be formed on a substrate


1000


as sections


1022


that have working electrodes


422


(

FIG. 5A

) thereon and sections


1024


that have counter electrode


424


and indicator electrodes


441


,


442


(FIG.


5


B). These working, counter and indicator electrodes are electrically connected to their corresponding traces and contact pads. Typically, working electrode sections


1022


are produced on one half of substrate


1000


and counter electrode sections


1024


are produce on the other half of substrate


1000


. In some embodiments, the substrate


1000


can be scored and folded to bring the sections


1022


,


1024


together to form the sensor. In some embodiments, as illustrated in

FIG. 13A

, the individual working electrode sections


1022


can be formed next to or adjacent each other on the substrate


1000


, to reduce waste material. Similarly, individual counter electrode sections


1024


can be formed next to or adjacent each other. In other embodiments, the individual working electrode sections


1022


(and, similarly, the counter electrode sections


1024


) can be spaced apart, as illustrated in FIG.


13


B. The remainder of the process is described for the manufacture of multiple sensors, but can be readily modified to form individual sensors.




Carbon or other electrode material (e.g., metal, such as gold or platinum) is formed on the substrate


1000


to provide a working electrode


422


for each sensor. The carbon or other electrode material can be deposited by a variety of methods including printing a carbon or metal ink, vapor deposition, and other methods. The printing may be done by screen printing, gravure roll printing, transfer printing, and other known printing methods. Trace


453


and contact pad


423


are preferably applied together with working electrode


422


, but may be applied in a subsequent step.




Similar to the working electrode


422


, the counter electrode(s)


424


,


441


,


442


(shown in

FIG. 5B

) are formed on the substrate


1000


. The counter electrodes are formed by providing carbon or other conductive electrode material onto the substrate. In one embodiment, the material used for the counter electrode(s) is a Ag/AgCl ink. The material of the counter electrode(s) may be deposited by a variety of methods including printing or vapor deposition. The printing may be done by screen printing, gravure roll printing, transfer printing, and other known printing methods. Traces


454


,


451


,


452


and contact pads


425


,


443


,


444


are preferably applied together with counter electrodes


424


,


441


,


442


, but may be applied in a subsequent step.




Preferably, multiple sensors


420


are manufactured simultaneously; that is, the working electrodes, including their traces and contact pads, for a plurality of sensors are produced (e.g., printed) on a polymer sheet or web, and simultaneously or subsequently, the counter electrodes, and their traces and contact pads, for a plurality of sensors are produced (e.g., printed). The working electrode(s) and counter electrode(s) can be formed on separate substrates that are later positioned opposite one another so that the electrodes face each other. Alternately, to simplify registration of the substrates, the working electrodes can be formed on a first half of a substrate sheet of web and the counter electrodes are formed on a second half of the substrate sheet or web so that the sheet or web can be folded to superimpose the working and counter electrodes in a facing arrangement.




To provide a sample chamber


426


, a spacer


433


is formed over at least one of the substrate/working electrode and substrate/counter electrode(s). The spacer


433


is preferably an adhesive spacer, such as a single layer of adhesive or a double-sided adhesive tape (e.g., a polymer carrier film with adhesive disposed on opposing surfaces). Suitable spacer materials include adhesives such as urethanes, acrylates, acrylics, latexes, rubbers and the like.




A channel, which will result in the sample chamber, is provided in the spacer


433


, either by cutting out a portion of the adhesive spacer or placing two adhesive pieces in close proximity but having a gap therebetween. The adhesive can be printed or otherwise disposed on the substrate according to a pattern which defines the channel region. The adhesive spacer can be optionally provided with one or more release liners prior to its incorporation into the sensor. The adhesive can be cut (e.g., die-cut or slit) to remove the portion of the adhesive corresponding to the channel prior to disposing the spacer on the substrate.




In one method of the invention, illustrated in

FIGS. 14A through 14G

, the adhesive includes a first and a second release liner. Prior to applying the adhesive to a first substrate/working electrode or substrate/counter electrode(s), the adhesive is “kiss-cut” through the first release liner and at least a portion of the underlying adhesive, preferably the entire adhesive but not through the second release liner, to form one or more sections, one of which will eventually result in a sample chamber. The first release liner is removed from the adhesive over its length but is retained over the sample chamber section. The exposed adhesive is then applied to the first substrate/working electrode or substrate/counter electrode(s). On removal of the second release liner, the adhesive positioned within the sample chamber sections is also removed, leaving a channel or opening in the adhesive spacer. The second substrate/working electrode or substrate/counter electrode(s) is then applied to the adhesive to form the layered sensor structure.





FIGS. 14A through 14G

describe in detail the processing of an adhesive layer by a “kiss-cut”. An adhesive layer that will eventually become spacer


433


is preferably obtained from an adhesive structure including an adhesive layer


1030


between a first release liner


1020


and a second release liner


1040


. A blade (e.g., a knife or die blade) cuts through the first release liner


1020


and at least a portion of the adhesive layer


1030


, but not through the second release liner


1040


, as shown in

FIG. 14B and 14G

, to form release liner sections


1020




a


,


1020




b


, and adhesive sections


1030




a


,


1030




b


. The space occupied by


1030




b


is the area that will result in the sample chamber of the sensor and can be referred to as “sample chamber region”. A cut configuration such as shown in

FIG. 14G

allows removal of one release liner section


1030




a


, leaving behind release liner section


1030




b


. The liner could be cut to provide individual strips extending the entire length of the liner; this would then need removal of each individual liner strip.




The release liner section


1030




a


is removed to provide the adhesive configuration shown in FIGS.


14


C. The exposed adhesive is positioned over and securely adhered to the substrate


1050


, as illustrated in FIG.


14


D. The adhesive sections


1030




a


without the release liner will adhere to the substrate


1050


. As shown in

FIG. 14E

, the second release liner


1040


is removed, pulling the cut and non-adhered section of adhesive


1030




b


and the first liner


1020




b


with it; this results in adhesive areas


1030




a


providing spacer layer sections


433




a


,


433




b


, with sample chamber


426


therebetween, as illustrated in FIG.


14


F. The second substrate is then positioned over the adhesive layer and laminated to the first substrate via the spacer


433


. The thickness of the spacer


433


typically determines the spacing between the working and counter electrodes, and thus impacts the volume of the sample chamber


426


. Preferably, the thickness does not vary more than ±5% over the individual sensor and/or among individual sensors in a batch. Use of the “kiss-cut” method for manufacturing the layered sensor structure preserves the integrity of the sample chamber walls during manufacturing, thereby providing for more reliable and reproducible sample chamber volumes.




The non-leachable or diffusible redox mediator and/or second electron transfer agent are disposed onto the substrate in at least the sample chamber regions. If either or both of these components is non-leachable, that component or components is preferably disposed on the working electrode. If either or both of these components is diffusible, that component or components can be disposed on any surface of the substrate in the channel region. The redox mediator and/or second electrode transfer agent can be disposed independently or together on the substrate prior to or after disposition of the spacer. The redox mediator and/or second electrode transfer agent may be disposed by a variety of methods including, for example, screen printing, ink jet printing, spraying, painting, striping along a row or column of aligned and/or adjacent electrodes, and the like. Other components can be deposited separately or together with the redox mediator and/or second electrode transfer agent; these components can include, for example, surfactants, polymers, polymer films, preservatives, binders, buffers, and cross-linkers.




After disposing the spacer, redox mediator, second electron transfer agent, sensing layers, and the like, the first and second substrates (having the working and counter electrodes thereon) are positioned opposite each other to form the sensor. The faces of the substrate are joined by the adhesive of the spacer. Preferably, after bringing the faces together, individual sensors are cut out from the web of sensors using a variety of methods including, for example, die cutting, slitting, or otherwise cutting away the excess substrate material and separating the individual sensors. In some embodiments, a combination of cutting or slitting methods is used. As another alternative, the individual sensor components can first be cut out of the substrates and then brought together to form the sensor by adhesively joining the two components, such as by using the spacer adhesive.




The sides of the sensor can be straight to allow the sensor to be cut out from the remainder of the substrate and/or from other sensors by slitting the substrate in parallel directions using, for example, a gang arbor blade system. The edges of the sensor can define edges of the sample chamber and/or measurement zone. By accurately controlling the distance between cuts, variability in sample chamber volume can often be reduced. In some instances, these cuts are preferably parallel to each other, as parallel cuts are typically the easiest to reproduce.




Sensor Connection to Electrical Device




Referring generally now to

FIGS. 16A and 16B

,


17


A and


17


B, and


18


A and


18


B, the assembled sensor of

FIGS. 5A through 5C

(as will be referred to as sensor


1420


) is typically coupled to a meter or other electrical device by electrical connector


1500


which is configured to couple with and contact the end of the sensor


1420


at contact pads


423


,


425


,


443


,


444


. The sensor meter typically includes a potentiostat or other component to provide a potential and/or current for the electrodes of the sensor. The sensor reader also typically includes a processor (e.g., a microprocessor or hardware) for determining analyte concentration from the sensor signals. The sensor meter also includes a display or a port for coupling a display to the sensor. The display displays the sensor signals and/or results determined from the sensor signals including, for example, analyte concentration, rate of change of analyte concentration, and/or the exceeding of a threshold analyte concentration (indicating, for example, hypo- or hyperglycemia).




One example of a suitable connector is shown in

FIGS. 16A and 16B

,


17


A and


17


B, and


18


A and


18


B. Connector


1500


(which is used to connect a sensor to a meter or other electrical device) is generally a two part structure, having top portion


1510


and bottom portion


1520


(see FIG.


16


B). Positioned between and secured by top portion


1510


and bottom portion


1520


arc contact leads


1423


,


1425


,


1443


,


1444


that provide electrical connection between the sensor


1420


and a meter. These leads


1423


,


1425


,


1443


,


1444


have proximal ends to physically contact pads


423


,


425


,


443


,


444


(in

FIGS. 5A and 5B

, respectively) and distal ends to connect to any attached meter. The end of the sensor


1420


which has the contact pads can be slid into or mated with the connector


1500


by placing the sensor


1420


into slide area


1530


, which provides a support for and retains sensor


1420


. It is typically important that the contact structures of the connector


1500


make electrical contact with the correct pads of the sensor so that the working electrode and counter electrode(s) are correctly coupled to the meter.




One optional feature is an insertion monitor


1450


, that is illustrated in

FIGS. 16A and 16B

, which are top views of the sensor prior to insertion into connector


1500


. This conductive insertion monitor is positioned on the non-conductive base substrate and has a contact pad for electrical contact with a connector. The insertion monitor is configured and arranged to close an electrical circuit between two contact structures


1451


and


1452


when the sensor is properly inserted into the connector. Proper insertion into the connector


1500


means that the sensor strip


1420


is inserted right side up, that the correct end of the strip is inserted into the connector, and that the strip is inserted far enough into the connector that reliable electrical connections are made between the electrodes' contact pads on the strip and the corresponding contact structures of the connector. Preferably, no closed circuit is made unless all electrode pads have properly contacted the contact structures of connector


1500


. The insertion monitor may have shapes other than a stripe across the width of the sensor; for example, other designs include an individual dot, a grid pattern, or may include stylistic features, such as words or letters.




Because this insertion monitor


1450


is not at the end with the contact regions for the electrodes, the insertion monitor


1450


does not require additional width space on the sensor. The width of the contact pads


443


,


425


,


444


,


423


is defined as the width on which a lead could be placed that would result in an electrical connection; typically, the contact width is the width of the exposed contact area. In one embodiment, six contact lead structures on the connector (i.e.,


1451


,


1443


,


1425


,


1444


,


1423


,


1452


) can contact sensor


1420


in the same width as the four contact pads (i.e.,


443


,


425


,


444


,


423


). This concept of having contact points on the sensor that occupy more width than the width of the sensor may be used for any number of contact points; this may be used with or without an insertion monitor.




As a particular example, four leads


1443


,


1425


,


1444


,


1423


make contact with contact pads


443


,


425


,


444


,


423


. If each lead and/or contact pad is one millimeter wide, a sensor of at least 4 mm wide is needed to make contact. Additional leads, such as those for insertion monitor


1450


(i.e., contact leads


1451


,


1452


), can make contact by having leads


1451


,


1452


extend along the side of leads


1443


and


1423


and then angle in toward the center of the strip


1420


after the point where leads


1443


,


1425


,


1444


,


1423


contact strip


1420


. The insertion monitor stripe leads


1451


,


1452


cross side edges of sensor


1420


to make contact with the sensor, thus not requiring additional sensor width.




The contact structures are parallel and non-overlapping and they run longitudinally from the distal end to the proximal end. The lead structures


1443


,


1425


,


1444


,


1423


terminate at their proximal end, but lead structures


1451


,


1452


continue longitudinally past the proximal end of lead structures


1443


,


1425


,


1444


,


1423


. Once past the proximal end, lead structures


1452


,


1452


angle in toward the center of the sensor strip.




The insertion monitor can also be used to encode information on a test strip. The encoded information can be, for example, calibration information for that manufacturing lot or for that specific strip. Such calibration information may relate to the sensitivity of the strip or to the y-intercept of its calibration curve. In one embodiment, the insertion monitor comprises two or more contact pads for connection to a meter. The two or more contact pads are connected to each other by a conductive material, such as a conductive ink. The resistance of conductive path between the two or more contact pads is related to the encoded information. As an example of discrete calibration values, resistance values in a given range can correspond to one calibration setting, and resistance values in a different range can correspond to a different calibration setting. As an example of continuous calibration values, the calibration setting may be a continuous function of the resistance. Examples of suitable conductive pathways between contact pads are shown in

FIGS. 19A through 19L

.




In

FIGS. 19A-19F

, multiple conductive pathways with different resistances are printed on the strip. The resistance of the pathway is varied by cutting or scoring some or all of the conductive pathways so that they do not carry charge. In

FIGS. 19G-19L

, the resistance is controlled by the width or length of the conductive path. While it is preferred to provide this encoded information on the insertion monitor, it should be recognized that the insertion monitor function and the encoding of information can also be implemented separately using separate conductive traces on the strip.




In another embodiment to ensure proper insertion of a sensor into a meter, the meter may include a raised area or bump that prevents or hinders the insertion of the sensor in an improper direction, as shown in FIG.


20


. To ensure proper insertion of the sensor


1100


into a connector


1110


, the connector


1110


may include a raised area


1140


that prevents or hinders the insertion of the sensor in an improper direction. For example, the width, w


2


, of the contact region of the second substrate


1130


may be wider than the width, w


1


, of the contact region of the first substrate


1120


. In this instance, the raised area


1140


is positioned to allow sensor


1100


to be slid into the connector so that the first substrate


1120


is next to the surface


1150


from which the raised area


1140


protrudes, but would prevent or hinder having the second substrate


1130


next to the surface


1150


from which the raised area


1140


protrudes. Objects other than a raised area can also be used to guide the user in correct introduction of the sensor into the meter.




Integrated Sample Acquisition and Analyte Measurement Device




An analyte measurement device constructed according to the principles of the present invention typically includes a sensor, as described hereinabove, combined with a sample acquisition apparatus to provide an integrated sampling and measurement device. The sample acquisition apparatus typically includes, for example, a skin piercing member, such as a lancet, that can be injected into a patient's skin to cause blood flow. In a preferred embodiment, the integrated sample acquisition and analyte measurement device comprises a lancing instrument that holds a lancet and measurement strip. The lancing instrument preferably requires active cocking. By requiring the user to cock the device prior to use, the risk of inadvertently triggering the lancet is minimized. Preferably, the lancing instrument will also permit the user to adjust the depth of penetration of the lancet into the skin. Such devices are already commercially available from companies such as Boehringer Mannheim and Palco. This feature allows users to adjust the lancing device for differences in skin thickness, skin durability, and pain sensitivity across different sites on the body and across different users.




Typically, a larger sample of body fluid such as blood or interstitial fluid is expressed when pressure is applied around a site where a hole has been created the skin. A sample acquisition device having a protruding ring, such as illustrated in

FIG. 21

, may be used. Ring


1200


circumferentially surrounds the lancing site to create increased pressure and extract a larger sample out of the wound. A lancet would protrude from the center


1220


of ring


1200


. Ring


1200


has a surface area


1210


that presses against the skin, thus increasing the tension on the skin and often providing a bump of skin. Skin that is more taught, and even extended, provides a large volume of fluid from the wound. The increased surface area


1210


and tighter skin provided by ring


1200


, decreases the amount of pain experienced by the patient during the lancing. Further, the tendency to bruise is typically decreased.




In one embodiment, the lancing instrument and the meter are integrated into a single device. To operate the device the user need only insert a disposable cartridge containing a measurement sensor and lancing device into the integrated device, cock the lancing instrument, press it against the skin to activate it, and read the result of the measurement. Such an integrated lancing instrument and test reader simplifies the testing procedure for the user and minimizes the handling of body fluids.




Operation of the Sensor and Meter




An electrochemical sensor of the invention can be operated with or without applying a potential across the electrodes. In one embodiment, the electrochemical reaction occurs spontaneously and a potential need not be applied between the working and counter electrodes. In another embodiment, a potential, which may or may not remain constant, is applied between the working and counter electrodes. The magnitude of the required potential depends on the redox mediator used. The potential at which the electrode poises itself, or where it is poised by applying an external bias, and where the analyte is electrolyzed, is typically such that the electrochemical reaction is driven to or near completion, but it is, preferably, not oxidizing enough to result in significant electrochemical reaction of interferents, such as urate, ascorbate, and acetaminophen, that can affect the signal measured. For non-leachable redox mediators, the potential is typically between about −350 mV and about +400 mV versus the standard calomel electrode (SCE). Preferably, the potential of the redox mediator is more negative than +100 mV, more preferably the potential is more negative than 0 mV, and most preferably the potential is about −150 mV versus SCE.




When an external potential is applied, it can be applied either before or after the sample has been placed in the sample chamber. If the measurement zone includes only a portion of the sample chamber then the potential is preferably applied after the sample has come to rest in the sample chamber to prevent electrolysis of sample passing through the measurement zone as the sample chamber is filling. Alternatively, in the case where the measurement zone includes most or all of the sample chamber, the potential can be applied before or during the filling of the sample chamber without affecting the accuracy of the assay. When the potential is applied and the sample is in the measurement zone, an electrical current will flow between the working electrode and the counter electrode. The current is a result, at least in part, of the electrolysis of the analyte in the sample. This electrochemical reaction occurs via the redox mediator and the optional second electron transfer agent. For many biomolecules, B, the process is described by the following reaction equations:










nA






(
ox
)


+

B






enzyme







nA






(
red
)


+
C




(
1
)













Biochemical B is oxidized to C by redox mediator A in the presence of an appropriate enzyme. Then the redox mediator A is oxidized at the electrode. Electrons are collected by the electrode and the resulting current is measured. The measured current may also include a background current resulting in a measured background charge, due, at least in part, to the shuttling of a diffusible redox mediator between the working electrode and the counter electrode. This background current can be minimized or accounted for, as described in PCT Application PCT/US99/23425, incorporated herein by reference.




A variety of techniques can be used to determine the concentration of an analyte in a sample. These techniques include, for example, coulometry, amperometry, and potentiometry. To determine the concentration of analyte (e.g., glucose) in the sample by coulometry, the charge passing or projected to pass between the working electrode(s) and counter electrode(s) during electrolysis of the analyte is determined. Knowledge of the charge and the volume of the sample chamber permit the calculation of the concentration of the electrolyzed analyte in the sample. This charge can be determined by several methods.




For example, the charge can be measured directly. This can be accomplished using a coulometer and known coulometric techniques. Typically, the charge is measured during the complete or nearly complete electrolysis of the analyte.




As another example, the charge can be determined from measurements of the electrolysis current, i


t


, over time, t. A series of currents (i


x


, i


x+1


, i


x+2


, . . . ) is measured for a series of times (t


x


, t


x+1


, t


x+2


, . . . ). The current can then be integrated (e.g., numerically integrated using known numerical methods) to give the charge. In some instances, current can be measured during the entire electrolysis. In other instances, current can be extrapolated after a period of time and the charge determined using a combination of the measured currents and extrapolated currents.




Extrapolation of current utilizes a projected relationship between current and time during at least a portion of the electrolysis. Typically, when the system is diffusion limited, the natural logarithm of the current is linearly related to the time. This typically occurs after a period of time during which the sensor “equilibrates”.

FIG. 15A

is an example of a graph of current versus time for electrolysis of an analyte, such as glucose, in one of the previously described sensors;

FIG. 15B

is a graph of the natural logarithm of current versus time for the same data. After the sample completely fills the sample chamber, the current increases to a peak current value, designated as “P” in

FIGS. 15A and 15B

, during which time the sensor is equilibrating. The peak current typically occurs during a period of time in which the system is kinetically, rather than diffusionally, limited. Typically, the current then begins to decrease, although, in some instances, further increases may occur before the current becomes diffusion limited. Eventually, the current values enter a region, designated as “L” in

FIG. 15B

, where there is a linear relationship between the natural logarithm of current and time. The remaining current needed to electrolyze a remaining portion of the analyte can then be extrapolated using estimation methods, such as nonlinear or, preferably, linear estimation methods (e.g., linear least squares techniques). The region where extrapolation occurs is designated as “E” in FIG.


15


B and the extrapolation is indicated as a solid line.




For this discussion, the current values being referred to are the absolute value of the actual current, thus, the sign of the current measurement is ignored. For example, the peak current is the largest deviation from zero current, whether positive or negative.




During the period when the system is diffusion limited the relationship between the natural logarithm of the current and time is linear. The remaining charge required to completely electrolyze the analyte remaining in the sample can be reliably estimated from the slope of this line. Care must be taken to ensure that the system is in the diffusion limited range before performing the estimation. One method of ensuring that the system is in the diffusion limited regime includes observing the current values until the peak current, i


peak


, (“P”) is achieved. Current values continue to be observed until the current drops below a threshold value, i


thresh


, that is typically a fraction of the peak current. For example, the threshold value can be one half, one third, or one quarter of the peak current (e.g., i


thresh


=j*i


peak


where j is, for example, 0.5, 0.33, or 0.25). The threshold value is chosen based on the characteristics of the sensor so that one has a high degree of confidence that the system will be diffusion limited at this time.




Many other methods may be used to ensure that the system is in a diffusion limited regime. For example, one could observe the current values after i


peak


until an inflection point is reached and the second derivative of the natural log of the current turns positive. At this point the system is typically in a diffusion limited regime.




After achieving the threshold value, slope values are determined using natural logarithms of two or more of the measured current values (e.g., m


x


=(log (i


x


)−log(i


x−y


))/(t


x


−t


x−y


) where m


x


is the slope at time t


x


, i


x


is the current at time t


x


, and i


x−y


is the current at time t


x−y


before t


x


). Although the slope can be determined using natural logarithms of any two current values (e.g., current values measured one directly after the other), preferably the slope is determined using natural logarithms of multiple consecutive current values or current values that are spaced apart by at least about ten (i.e., y=10), and, preferably, at least about thirty (i.e., y=30), current values. This procedure can reduce the effect of random noise in the system. Optionally, the consistency of multiple slope values (e.g., three or five or ten slope values) can be observed for verification. For example, the system can look for ten monotonically decreasing slope values before accepting the slope value for use in the estimation.




The determined slope value is used to extrapolate the charge required to completely electrolyze the analyte remaining in the sample. That is, the current is extrapolated to zero current. Known extrapolation techniques (e.g., linear extrapolation techniques) can be used. The total charge required to electrolyze the analyte is determined by adding the measured charge and extrapolated charge.




Current values (or other measured values) can also be used to monitor the operation of the sensor and meter. For example, ratios of current values can be checked to determine if there has been some failure of the measurement (e.g., the sensor has been pulled out of the measuring device, etc.). The acceptable ratio range will typically depend on the type and components of the sensor, the rate at which measurements are made, and the acceptable noise level. As an example, an acceptable ratio range could be, for example, 2:1 to 1:2 for immediately adjacent measurements.




The discussion above has focused on the extrapolation of charge required to complete electrolysis of an analyte in a sample using the slope of the natural logarithm of current versus time under diffusion limited conditions. Those skilled in the art will recognize that this slope is related to a Effective Diffusion Coefficient, and that other linear or non-linear mathematical functions related to the Effective Diffusion Coefficient can also be used to extrapolate the charge.




The extrapolation of current measurements and the determination of charge passed or projected to pass, as well as the concentration of the analyte, and other functions can be performed by a processor with or without a storage medium, in which the desired procedures are performed by software, hardware, or a combination thereof. According to another embodiment, these same procedures are accomplished using discrete or semi-programmable hardware configured, for example, using a hardware descriptive language, such as Verilog. In yet another embodiment, the procedures are performed using a processor having at least one look-up table arrangement with data stored therein to represent the complete result or partial results of the above equations based on a given set of input data.




Current measurements can be made by a variety of methods. For example, the current measurements can be made by measuring the current directly using any known techniques and devices.




Another method of measuring current includes discharging a known amount of charge into the sample (by electrolysis of the analyte) and measuring the time required for the discharge. Current is then calculated as the quotient of charge and discharge time. As an example, a capacitor can be charged by circuitry in the meter and then coupled to the working or counter electrode(s) to discharge by electrolysis of the analyte. The time to discharge to a threshold level can be measured using, for example, a clock circuit that is part of the processing circuitry of the meter. The use of a clock circuit permits very accurate measurements of time. This can be advantageous over designs that directly measure current or charge and must convert these analog measurements to processible digital representations using the more expensive A/D (analog-to-digital) converters.




The accuracy of the charge and time measurement, which provides the current values, affects the accuracy of the final analyte concentration measurement. Although it is desired to use a high-quality and highly accurate measuring device, the capacitor used to store the charge can be a high-quality, expensive capacitor that has a precisely known capacitance. Alternatively, an accurate charge measurement can be obtained by using a calibrating resistor in parallel with the capacitor. During a calibration period, the capacitor discharges through the resistor and the current through the resistor or the time constant of the discharge can be determined. This can then be used to determine the charge stored in the capacitor. A high-quality, very accurate resistor is typically less expensive than a similarly accurate capacitor, and will provide the same amount of accuracy to the charge measurement.




The charge, Q, no matter how determined, is then used to calculate the concentration of the analyte (C


A


) by the following equation (when the redox mediator is non-leachable):








C




A




=Q/nFV


  (3a)






where n is the number of electron equivalents required to electrolyze the analyte, F is Faraday's constant (approximately 96,500 coulombs per equivalent), and V is the volume of sample in the measurement zone. When using a diffusible mediator, the concentration of the analyte can be obtained from the following equation:








C




A


=(


Q




tot




−Q




back


)/


nFV


  (3b)






where Q


tot


is the total charge transferred during the measurement and Q


back


is the amount of charge transferred that was not due to the analyte, e.g., charge transferred by the shuttling of the diffusible mediator between the working electrode and the counter electrode. In at least some instances, the sensor is constructed so that the background charge is at most 5 times the size of the charge generated by electrolysis of an amount of analyte. Preferably, the background signal is at most 200%, 100%, 50%, 25%, 10%, or 5% of the charge generated by electrolysis of the analyte.




One example of a method for determining the ratio of background signal to signal generated by electrolysis of the analyte is described as follows. If the shuttling of the redox mediator is not disabled by the applied potential, the charge that results from the shuttling may be represented by the following formula:








Q




back


=(


AFD




M




C




M




/d


) (


tn




M


)






where A is the area of the working electrode; F is Faraday's constant (96,500 coulombs/equivalent); D


M


is the effective diffusion coefficient of the redox mediator; C


M


is the concentration of the redox mediator in the measurement zone; d is the distance separating facing electrodes; t is the amount of time for the measurement; and n


M


is the number of electrons gained or lost by the redox mediator.




Additionally, the charge of the analyte, when the analyte is electrooxidized to about 90% completion in the measurement period, may be represented by the following formula:







Q




G




=Ad


(0.90)


C




G




n




G




F






where A is the area of the working electrode; d is the distance separating facing electrodes; C


G


is the concentration of glucose; n is the number of electrons needed to electrolyze the analyte (e.g., 2 electrons per glucose molecule); and F is Faraday's constant. For glucose, when C


G


is 5 mM (or 5×10


−6


moles/cm


3


), t is 60 seconds, n


G


is 2, and n


M


is 1, the ratio of charge from the redox mediator to the charge from electrooxidation of the analyte may be represented by the following formula:








Q




Back




/Q




G


=(


D




M




C




M




/d




2


)(


tn




M


/(0.9


n




G




C




G


))=(


D




M




C




M




/d




2


)×(6.7×10


6


)






For example, if the ratio of Q


Back


/Q


G


is 5, then (D


M


C


M


)/d


2


is 7.5×10


−7


moles/(cm


3


sec). Also for example, if the ratio of Q


Back


/Q


G


is 1, then (D


M


C


M


)/d


2


is 1.5×10


−7


moles/(cm


3


sec). Still another example, if the ratio is 0.1, then (D


M


C


M


)/d


2


is 1.5×10


−8


moles/(cm


3


sec). Thus, depending on the ratio desired, a sensor may be configured to have the desired ratio by choosing D


M


, C


M


, and d accordingly.




The ratio can be affected, for example, by reducing the concentration of is the redox mediator (i.e., C


M


may be reduced). Alternatively, or additionally, the diffusion of the redox mediator may be reduced. Other sensor configurations are also suitable for controlling the ratio of background signal to signal generated by the analyte and will be described below.




The background charge, Q


back


, can be accounted for in a variety of ways. Q


back


can be made small, for example, by using only limited amounts of diffusible redox mediator; by providing a membrane over the counter electrode that limits diffusion of the redox mediator to the counter electrode; or by having a relatively small potential difference between the working electrode and the counter electrode. Other examples of sensor configurations and methods suitable for reducing Q


back


include having a redox mediator reaction rate at the working electrode that is significantly faster than that at the counter electrode; immobilizing the redox mediator on the working electrode; having the redox mediator become immobilized on the counter or counter/reference electrode upon its reaction at the counter or counter/reference electrode; or slowing the diffusion of the redox mediator.




For coulometric measurements, at least 20% of the analyte is electrolyzed, preferably at least 50%, more preferably at least 80%, and even more preferably at least 90% of the analyte is electrolyzed. In one embodiment of the invention, the analyte is completely or nearly completely electrolyzed. The charge can then be calculated from current measurements made during the electrochemical reaction, and the concentration of the analyte is determined using equation (3a) or (3b). The completion of the electrochemical reaction is typically signaled when the current reaches a steady-state value. This indicates that all or nearly all of the analyte has been electrolyzed. For this type of measurement, at least 90% of the analyte is typically electrolyzed, preferably, at least 95% of the analyte is electrolyzed and, more preferably, at least 99% of the analyte is electrolyzed.




For coulometry, it is typically desirable that the analyte be electrolyzed quickly. The speed of the electrochemical reaction depends on several factors, including the potential that is applied between the electrodes and the kinetics of reactions (1) and (2). Other significant factors include the size of the measurement zone. In general, the larger the potential, the larger the current through the cell and therefore, the faster the reaction will typically occur. However, if the potential is too large, other electrochemical reactions may introduce significant error in the measurement. Typically, the potential between the electrodes as well as the specific redox mediator and optional second electron transfer agent are chosen so that the analyte will be almost completely electrolyzed in less than 5 minutes, based on the expected concentration of the analyte in the sample. Preferably, the analyte will be almost completely electrolyzed within about 2 minutes and, more preferably, within about 1 minute.




Although coulometry has the disadvantage of requiring the volume of the measured sample be known, coulometry is a preferred technique for the analysis of the small sample because it has the advantages of, for example, no temperature dependence for the measurement, no enzyme activity dependence for the measurement, no redox-mediator activity dependence for the measurement, and no error in the measurement from depletion of analyte in the sample. As already described above, coulometry is a method for determining the amount of charge passed or projected to pass during complete or nearly complete electrolysis of the analyte. One coulometric technique involves electrolyzing the analyte on a working electrode and measuring the resulting current between the working electrode and a counter electrode at two or more times during the electrolysis. The electrolysis is complete when the current reaches a steady state. The charge used to electrolyze the sample is then calculated by integrating the measured currents over time and accounting for any background signal. Because the charge is directly related to the amount of analyte in the sample there is no temperature dependence of the measurement. In addition, the activity of the enzyme does not affect the value of the measurement, but only the time required to obtain the measurement (i.e., less active enzyme requires a longer time to achieve complete electrolysis of the sample) so that decay of the enzyme over time will not render the analyte concentration determination inaccurate. And finally, the depletion of the analyte in the sample by electrolysis is not a source of error, but rather the objective of the technique. (However, the analyte need not be completely electrolyzed if the electrolysis curve is extrapolated from the partial electrolysis curve based on well-known electrochemical principles.)




It may be desirable in some instances to utilize non-coulometric assays, such as amperometric or potentiometric measurement techniques. “Amperometry” and “chronopotentiometry” refer to taking a potentiometric measurement at one or more points in time. These measurement techniques are useful when the volume of the measured sample is unknown; the volume of the sample in the measurement zone of a small volume sensor (i.e., no more than one microliter) may be difficult to accurately reproduce if the manufacturing tolerances of one or more dimensions of the measurement zone have significant variances. For information regarding using non-coulometric measuring, such as amperometric and potentiometric techniques, see, for example, U.S. application Ser. No. 09/295,962, filed April 21, 1999, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.




Heating of Sample




The sample can be heated to increase the rate of diffusion, oxidation, or reduction of the analyte. This heating can be accomplished by a variety of techniques including placing the sensor in a heated environment or applying a heating unit to the sensor.




Another technique includes providing a thermal heating element, such as, for example, a wire or an ink that is capable of converting electrical energy into heat energy, on the sensor. This wire or ink can be applied, for example, on the opposite side of a base material, such as a polymer film, from one or more of the working, counter, reference, or counter/reference electrodes, or applied around the periphery of the working, counter, reference, or counter/reference electrodes. In some instances, the sample is heated up to 5 to 20° C. above an initial temperature. In other instances, the temperature of the sample may not be known but a constant amount of power or current is applied to the wire or ink.




GENERAL EXAMPLES




The invention will be further characterized by the following general examples. These examples are not meant to limit the scope of the invention which has been fully set forth in the foregoing description. Variations within the concepts of the invention are apparent to those skilled in the art.




One method for manufacturing the sensor shown in

FIGS. 5A through 5C

, having a working electrode, multiple counter/reference electrodes, and a side filled sample chamber, is described below. According to the method described herein, a plurality of sensors are produced and then separated.




A first non-conducting substrate, preferably polyester, is provided. A conductive carbon ink, such as that available from Ercon of Wareham, Mass. under the trade designation “Graphite#G4491”, is screen printed onto a first half of the first polymeric substrate in the pattern shown in FIG.


5


A and dried, to provide the working electrode


422


, trace


453


and contact pad


423


. Once the substrate web is cut to the final size, each working electrode


422


will extend across the width of the sensor and have a trace


453


that extends to the far end of the sensor. As an example, a sensor can be made with a width of about 6.1 mm (0.240 inch). Typical sensor widths are about 2 mm to 20 mm, preferably about 4 mm to 10 mm, but wider or narrower sensors can be used as desired.




A sensing layer, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/295,962, comprising a diffusible mediator and diffusible glucose dehydrogenase enzyme, is applied to the working electrode in a sample chamber region. The sensing layer can be provided on the electrode prior to or subsequent to providing the sample chamber. On the other half of the polyester substrate, a conductive silver/silver chloride ink, such as that commercially available from Ercon under the trade designation “Silver/Silver Chloride#R414”, is screen printed onto a second half of the first polymeric substrate in the pattern shown in FIG.


5


B and dried. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 5B

, the Ag/AgCl ink provides a first indicator or reference electrode


441


, a counter electrode


424


, and a second indicator electrode


442


. Counter electrode may extend across the entire sensor surface, or may extend only a portion thereof. As an example, the width of a counter electrode is about 1 mm to 20 mm, preferably about 2 to 10 mm. In one sensor configuration, the counter electrode


424


has a width of about 3.71 mm (0.146 inch). The indicator electrodes can have a width, for example, of about 0.1 mm to 5 mm, preferably about 0.25 mm to about 1 mm.




In one sensor configuration, working electrode, such as working electrode


422


shown in

FIG. 5A

, extends the width of the sensor, which is about 6.1 mm (0.240 inch). A counter electrode, such as counter electrode


424


, has a width of about 3.71 mm (0.146 inch). Indicator electrodes, such as indicator electrodes


441


,


442


in

FIG. 5B

, each can have a width of about 0.51 mm (0.020 inch). A spacing of 0.30 mm (0.012 inch) is present between these indicator electrodes and the counter electrode. The indicator electrodes may be each set back from the eventual side edge of the sensor strip, for example, by approximately 0.38 mm (0.015 inch), so that the electrodes


441


,


442


are not damaged, for example, smeared, streaked, chipped or the like, by the process of slitting the substrate into individual sensors.




The invention has been described with reference to various specific and preferred embodiments and techniques. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinarily skill in the art that many variations and modifications may be made while remaining within the spirit and scope of the invention.




All publications and patent applications in this specification are indicative of the level of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually incorporated by reference.



Claims
  • 1. An operative combination for use in measuring bioanalyte in a sample; the combination comprising:(a) a sensor strip; the sensor strip comprising: (i) a substrate having a first end, a second end opposite the first end, a first side edge extending between the first end and second end, and a second side edge, opposite the first side edge and extending between the first end and second end; (A) the substrate first end sized for insertion into an electrical connector; (ii) a sample chamber positioned between the first and second ends; (iii) at least three electrodes on the substrate and in operative contact with the sample chamber, each of the electrodes including a separate electrode trace extending from the sample chamber and along a length of the substrate; and (iv) an insertion monitor stripe on the substrate; (b) an electrical connector in electrical communication with a meter, the electrical connector having a sensor strip receiving area sized for operative receipt of the first end of the substrate; the electrical connector further comprising: (i) a first contact structure comprising at least three contact leads, one each of which is positioned to engage one each of three of the at least three electrode traces of the sensor strip when the substrate is operatively positioned with the first end positioned in the sensor strip receiving area of the electrical connector; (ii) a second contact structure comprising at least a first insertion lead and a second insertion lead, each of the first and second insertion leads being positioned to operatively engage the insertion monitor stripe when the first end is operatively positioned in the sensor strip receiving area; (A) the first insertion lead being positioned with a portion thereof extending across the first side edge of the sensor strip substrate to engage the insertion monitor stripe when the first end is operatively positioned in the sensor strip receiving area of the electrical connector; and, (B) the second insertion lead being positioned with a portion thereof extending across the second side edge of the sensor strip substrate to engage the insertion monitor stripe when the first end is operatively positioned in the sensor strip receiving area of the electrical connector; (c) the sensor strip being removably mounted to the electrical connector with the substrate first end received in the sensor strip receiving area.
  • 2. An operative combination according to claim 1 wherein:(a) the insertion monitor stripe extends across the substrate from the first side edge to the second side edge.
  • 3. An operative combination according to claim 1 wherein:(a) the substrate has a first end edge adjacent the first end; and (b) each one of the at least three electrode traces terminates at the first end edge of the substrate first end.
  • 4. A kit for use in measuring bioanalyte in a sample; the kit comprising:(a) a sensor strip; the sensor strip comprising: (i) a substrate having a first end, a second end opposite the first end, a first side edge extending between the first end and second end, and a second side edge, opposite the first side edge and extending between the first end and second end; (A) the substrate first end sized for insertion into an electrical connector; (ii) a sample chamber positioned between the first and second ends; (iii) at least three electrodes on the substrate and in operative contact with the sample chamber, each of the electrodes including a separate electrode trace extending from the sample chamber of the substrate; and (iv) an insertion monitor stripe on the substrate; (b) an electrical connector having a sensor strip receiving area sized for operative receipt therein of the first end of the sensor strip substrate; the electrical connector further comprising: (i) a first contact structure comprising at least three contact leads, one each of which is positioned to engage one each of three of the at least three electrode traces of the sensor strip when the substrate is operatively positioned with the first end positioned in the sensor strip receiving area of the electrical connector; (ii) second contact structure comprising at least a first insertion lead and a second insertion lead, each of the first and second insertion leads being positioned to operatively engage the insertion monitor stripe when the sensor strip first end is operatively positioned in the sensor strip receiving area; (A) the first insertion lead being positioned with a portion thereof extending across the first side edge of the sensor strip substrate to engage the insertion monitor stripe when the first end is operatively positioned in the sensor strip receiving area of the electrical connector; and, (B) the second insertion lead being positioned with a portion thereof extending across the second side edge of the sensor strip substrate to engage the insertion monitor stripe when the first end is operatively positioned in the sensor strip receiving area of the electrical connector.
  • 5. A kit according to claim 4 wherein:(a) the insertion monitor stripe extends from the first side edge of the substrate to the second side edge of the substrate.
  • 6. A kit according to claim 5 wherein:(a) the sensor strip substrate has a first end edge adjacent the first end, the first end edge extending between the first side edge and the second side edge; (b) each one of the at least three contact leads of the first contact structure is positioned to extend across the first end edge of the sensor strip substrate to engage one of the at least three electrode traces when the sensor strip substrate first end is operatively positioned in the sensor strip receiving area of the electrical connector.
  • 7. A kit according to claim 5 wherein:(a) the sample chamber includes a measurement zone having a volume of no more than 1 μl.
  • 8. A kit according to claim 7 wherein:(a) the sensor strip is a side-filling sensor strip.
  • 9. A kit according to claim 5 wherein:(a) the sensor strip is a tip-filling sensor strip.
  • 10. A kit according to claim 5 wherein:(a) at least one of the at least three electrodes of the sensor strip is a working electrode covered by a redox mediator.
  • 11. A kit according to claim 10 wherein:(a) the redox mediator comprises a transition metal complex of osmium.
  • 12. A kit according to claim 11 wherein:(a) a first one of the at least three electrodes of the sensor strip is positioned opposite to, and facing, a second one of the at least three electrodes of the sensor strip, with the sample chamber positioned therebetween.
  • 13. A kit according to claim 12 wherein:(a) the first one of the at least three electrodes is separated from the second one of the at least three electrodes by no more than 50 μm.
  • 14. A kit according to claim 5 wherein:(a) the at least three electrodes of the sensor strip are positioned coplanar with one another.
  • 15. A kit according to claim 5 wherein:(a) the sensor strip comprises first and second, non-conducting, base substrates; (b) the sample chamber and the at least three electrodes are positioned between the first and second base substrates; (i) one of the at least three electrodes being a reference electrode positioned on one of the first and second, non-conducting, substrates; (A) the reference electrode comprising a conductive carbon electrode; and (ii) a second one of the at least three electrodes is a first working electrode positioned on one of the first and second non-conducting substrates; (A) the first working electrode comprising a conductive carbon electrode; and (iii) a third one of the at least three electrodes is a second working electrode positioned on one of the first and second non-conducting substrates; (A) said second working electrode comprising a conductive carbon electrode.
  • 16. A kit according to claim 15 wherein:(a) the electrical connector further comprises a portion of a system that includes a sensor meter having: (i) a component to selectively provide at least one of potential and current to the first contact structure; (ii) a processor to selectively determine analyte concentration from sensor signals received via the electrical connector; and, (iii) a display to selectively show results determined from the sensor signals.
  • 17. A kit according to claim 15 wherein:(a) the insertion monitor stripe is positioned on an opposite side of one of the non-conducting base substrates from the sample chamber.
  • 18. A method of measuring bioanalyte in a sample; said method comprising:(a) measuring a bioanalyte concentration in a sample, which includes inserting a first end of a sensor strip into a sensor strip receiving area of a electrical connector; the step of inserting including: (i) contacting one each of at least three contact leads in the electrical connector with separate ones of at least three electrode traces on the sensor strip; and (ii) contacting first and second insertion leads of the electrical connector with an insertion monitor stripe on the sensor strip: (A) the step of inserting including positioning the sensor strip so that the first insertion lead extends across a first side edge of the sensor strip to engage the insertion monitor stripe; and (B) the step of inserting including positioning the sensor strip so that the second insertion lead extends across a second side edge of the sensor strip to engage the insertion monitor strip, the second side edge being an edge opposite the first side edge.
  • 19. A method according to claim 18 wherein:(a) the step of inserting includes positioning the sensor strip so that each one of three contact leads in the electrical connector extends across a first end edge of the sensor strip, to engage a respective electrode trace; (i) the first end edge extending between the first and second side edges.
  • 20. A method according to claim 18 wherein:(a) the step of inserting includes inserting a first end of a sensor strip which includes, in a portion of the sensor strip other than the first end, a sample chamber including blood therein.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/434,026, filed Nov. 4, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,616,819, which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (270)
Number Name Date Kind
3260656 Ross, Jr. Jul 1966 A
3653841 Klein Apr 1972 A
3719564 Lilly, Jr. et al. Mar 1973 A
3776832 Oswin et al. Dec 1973 A
3837339 Aisenberg et al. Sep 1974 A
3972320 Kalman Aug 1976 A
3979274 Newman Sep 1976 A
4008717 Kowarski Feb 1977 A
4016866 Lawton Apr 1977 A
4055175 Clemens et al. Oct 1977 A
4059406 Fleet Nov 1977 A
4076596 Connery et al. Feb 1978 A
4098574 Dappen Jul 1978 A
4100048 Pompei et al. Jul 1978 A
4151845 Clemens May 1979 A
4168205 Danninger et al. Sep 1979 A
4172770 Semersky et al. Oct 1979 A
4178916 McNamara Dec 1979 A
4206755 Klein Jun 1980 A
4224125 Nakamura et al. Sep 1980 A
4240438 Updike et al. Dec 1980 A
4240889 Yoda et al. Dec 1980 A
4247297 Berti et al. Jan 1981 A
4271119 Columbus Jun 1981 A
4318784 Higgins et al. Mar 1982 A
4340458 Lerner et al. Jul 1982 A
4356074 Johnson Oct 1982 A
4365637 Johnson Dec 1982 A
4366033 Richter et al. Dec 1982 A
4375399 Havas et al. Mar 1983 A
4384586 Christiansen May 1983 A
4392933 Nakamura et al. Jul 1983 A
4401122 Clark, Jr. Aug 1983 A
4404066 Johnson Sep 1983 A
4407959 Tsuji et al. Oct 1983 A
4418148 Oberhardt Nov 1983 A
4420564 Tsuji et al. Dec 1983 A
4427770 Chen et al. Jan 1984 A
4431004 Bessman et al. Feb 1984 A
4436094 Cerami Mar 1984 A
4440175 Wilkins Apr 1984 A
4444892 Malmros Apr 1984 A
4450842 Zick et al. May 1984 A
4461691 Frank Jul 1984 A
4469110 Slama Sep 1984 A
4477314 Richter et al. Oct 1984 A
4483924 Tsuji et al. Nov 1984 A
4484987 Gough Nov 1984 A
4522690 Venkatasetty Jun 1985 A
4524114 Samuels et al. Jun 1985 A
4526661 Steckhan et al. Jul 1985 A
4534356 Papadakis Aug 1985 A
4538616 Rogoff Sep 1985 A
4543955 Schroeppel Oct 1985 A
4545382 Higgins et al. Oct 1985 A
4552840 Riffer Nov 1985 A
4560534 Kung et al. Dec 1985 A
4571292 Liu et al. Feb 1986 A
4573994 Fischell et al. Mar 1986 A
4581336 Malloy et al. Apr 1986 A
4595011 Phillips Jun 1986 A
4619754 Niki et al. Oct 1986 A
4633878 Bombardieri Jan 1987 A
4637403 Garcia et al. Jan 1987 A
4650547 Gough Mar 1987 A
4654197 Lilja et al. Mar 1987 A
4655880 Liu Apr 1987 A
4655885 Hill et al. Apr 1987 A
4671288 Gough Jun 1987 A
4679562 Luksha Jul 1987 A
4680268 Clark, Jr. Jul 1987 A
4682602 Prohaska Jul 1987 A
4684537 Graetzel et al. Aug 1987 A
4685463 Williams Aug 1987 A
4703756 Gough et al. Nov 1987 A
4711245 Higgins et al. Dec 1987 A
4714874 Morris et al. Dec 1987 A
4717673 Wrighton et al. Jan 1988 A
4721601 Wrighton et al. Jan 1988 A
4726378 Kaplan Feb 1988 A
4750496 Reinhart et al. Jun 1988 A
4757022 Shults et al. Jul 1988 A
4758323 Davis et al. Jul 1988 A
4759371 Franetzki Jul 1988 A
4759828 Young et al. Jul 1988 A
4764416 Ueyama et al. Aug 1988 A
4776944 Janata et al. Oct 1988 A
4781798 Gough Nov 1988 A
4784736 Lonsdale et al. Nov 1988 A
4795707 Niiyama et al. Jan 1989 A
4805624 Yao et al. Feb 1989 A
4813424 Wilkins Mar 1989 A
4815469 Cohen et al. Mar 1989 A
4820399 Senda et al. Apr 1989 A
4822337 Newhouse et al. Apr 1989 A
4830959 McNeil et al. May 1989 A
4832797 Vadgama et al. May 1989 A
4840893 Hill et al. Jun 1989 A
4848351 Finch Jul 1989 A
4854153 Miyagawa et al. Aug 1989 A
4871351 Feingold Oct 1989 A
4871440 Nagata et al. Oct 1989 A
4890620 Gough Jan 1990 A
4894137 Takizawa et al. Jan 1990 A
4897162 Lewandowski et al. Jan 1990 A
4897173 Nankai et al. Jan 1990 A
4909908 Ross et al. Mar 1990 A
4911794 Parce et al. Mar 1990 A
4919141 Zier et al. Apr 1990 A
4919767 Vadgama et al. Apr 1990 A
4923586 Katayama et al. May 1990 A
4927516 Yamaguchi et al. May 1990 A
4935105 Churchouse Jun 1990 A
4935345 Guilbeau et al. Jun 1990 A
4936956 Wrighton Jun 1990 A
4938860 Wogoman Jul 1990 A
4942127 Wada et al. Jul 1990 A
4945045 Forrest et al. Jul 1990 A
4950378 Nagata Aug 1990 A
4953552 DeMarzo Sep 1990 A
4968400 Shimomura et al. Nov 1990 A
4970145 Bennetto et al. Nov 1990 A
4974929 Curry Dec 1990 A
4986271 Wilkins Jan 1991 A
4994167 Shults et al. Feb 1991 A
4999582 Parks et al. Mar 1991 A
5034192 Wrighton et al. Jul 1991 A
5037527 Hayashi et al. Aug 1991 A
5070535 Hochmair et al. Dec 1991 A
5078854 Burgess et al. Jan 1992 A
5082550 Rishpon et al. Jan 1992 A
5082786 Nakamoto Jan 1992 A
5089112 Skotheim et al. Feb 1992 A
5094951 Rosenberg Mar 1992 A
5096560 Takai et al. Mar 1992 A
5096836 Macho et al. Mar 1992 A
5101814 Palti Apr 1992 A
5108564 Szuminsky et al. Apr 1992 A
5109850 Blanco et al. May 1992 A
5120420 Nankai et al. Jun 1992 A
5120421 Glass et al. Jun 1992 A
5126034 Carter et al. Jun 1992 A
5126247 Palmer et al. Jun 1992 A
5128015 Szuminsky et al. Jul 1992 A
5130009 Marsoner et al. Jul 1992 A
5133856 Yamaguchi et al. Jul 1992 A
5140393 Hijikihigawa et al. Aug 1992 A
5141868 Shanks et al. Aug 1992 A
5161532 Joseph Nov 1992 A
5165407 Wilson et al. Nov 1992 A
5168046 Hamamoto et al. Dec 1992 A
5174291 Schoonen et al. Dec 1992 A
5185256 Nankai et al. Feb 1993 A
5192415 Yoshioka et al. Mar 1993 A
5192416 Wang et al. Mar 1993 A
5198367 Aizawa et al. Mar 1993 A
5200051 Cozzette et al. Apr 1993 A
5202261 Musho et al. Apr 1993 A
5205920 Oyama et al. Apr 1993 A
5206145 Cattell Apr 1993 A
5208154 Weaver et al. May 1993 A
5217595 Smith et al. Jun 1993 A
5227042 Zawodzinski et al. Jul 1993 A
5229282 Yoshioka et al. Jul 1993 A
5250439 Musho et al. Oct 1993 A
5262035 Gregg et al. Nov 1993 A
5262305 Heller et al. Nov 1993 A
5264103 Yoshioka et al. Nov 1993 A
5264106 McAleer et al. Nov 1993 A
5266179 Nankai et al. Nov 1993 A
5271815 Wong Dec 1993 A
5272060 Hamamoto et al. Dec 1993 A
5278079 Gubinski et al. Jan 1994 A
5286362 Hoenes et al. Feb 1994 A
5286364 Yacynych et al. Feb 1994 A
5288636 Pollmann et al. Feb 1994 A
5293546 Tadros et al. Mar 1994 A
5310885 Maier et al. May 1994 A
5320725 Gregg et al. Jun 1994 A
5326449 Cunningham Jul 1994 A
5337747 Neftel Aug 1994 A
5352348 Young et al. Oct 1994 A
5352351 White et al. Oct 1994 A
5356786 Heller et al. Oct 1994 A
5364797 Olson et al. Nov 1994 A
5368028 Palti Nov 1994 A
5372133 Hogen Esch Dec 1994 A
5378628 Gratzel et al. Jan 1995 A
5380422 Negishi et al. Jan 1995 A
5382346 Uenoyama et al. Jan 1995 A
5384028 Ito Jan 1995 A
5387327 Khan Feb 1995 A
5390671 Lord et al. Feb 1995 A
5391250 Cheney, II et al. Feb 1995 A
5393903 Gratzel et al. Feb 1995 A
5395504 Saurer et al. Mar 1995 A
5410474 Fox Apr 1995 A
5411647 Johnson et al. May 1995 A
5413690 Kost et al. May 1995 A
5422246 Koopal et al. Jun 1995 A
5437973 Vadgama et al. Aug 1995 A
5437999 Diebold et al. Aug 1995 A
5438271 White et al. Aug 1995 A
5478751 Oosta et al. Dec 1995 A
5494562 Maley et al. Feb 1996 A
5496453 Uenoyama et al. Mar 1996 A
5497772 Schulman et al. Mar 1996 A
5501956 Wada et al. Mar 1996 A
5502396 Desarzens et al. Mar 1996 A
5507288 Bocker et al. Apr 1996 A
5508171 Walling et al. Apr 1996 A
5514253 Davis et al. May 1996 A
5520787 Hanagan et al. May 1996 A
5525511 D'Costa Jun 1996 A
5526120 Jina et al. Jun 1996 A
5531878 Vadgama et al. Jul 1996 A
5552027 Birkle et al. Sep 1996 A
5556524 Albers Sep 1996 A
5565085 Ikeda et al. Oct 1996 A
5567302 Song et al. Oct 1996 A
5568806 Cheney, II et al. Oct 1996 A
5569186 Lord et al. Oct 1996 A
5575895 Ikeda et al. Nov 1996 A
5580527 Bell et al. Dec 1996 A
5582184 Erickson et al. Dec 1996 A
5582697 Ikeda et al. Dec 1996 A
5582698 Flaherty et al. Dec 1996 A
5586553 Halili et al. Dec 1996 A
5589045 Hyodo Dec 1996 A
5589326 Deng et al. Dec 1996 A
5593852 Heller et al. Jan 1997 A
5596150 Arndt et al. Jan 1997 A
5599479 Kimura et al. Feb 1997 A
5617851 Lipkovker Apr 1997 A
5628890 Carter et al. May 1997 A
5650062 Ikeda et al. Jul 1997 A
5651869 Yoshioka et al. Jul 1997 A
5660163 Schulman et al. Aug 1997 A
5670031 Hintsche et al. Sep 1997 A
5680858 Hansen et al. Oct 1997 A
5682233 Brinda Oct 1997 A
5695623 Michel et al. Dec 1997 A
5708247 McAleer et al. Jan 1998 A
5711861 Ward et al. Jan 1998 A
5711862 Sakoda et al. Jan 1998 A
5720862 Hamamoto et al. Feb 1998 A
5727548 Hill et al. Mar 1998 A
5741211 Renirie et al. Apr 1998 A
5741688 Oxenbo ll et al. Apr 1998 A
5746217 Erickson et al. May 1998 A
5770028 Maley et al. Jun 1998 A
5781455 Hyodo Jul 1998 A
5791344 Schulman et al. Aug 1998 A
5804048 Wong et al. Sep 1998 A
5820570 Erickson et al. Oct 1998 A
5830341 Gilmartin Nov 1998 A
5834224 Ruger et al. Nov 1998 A
5837454 Cozzette et al. Nov 1998 A
5842983 Abel et al. Dec 1998 A
5846702 Deng et al. Dec 1998 A
5846744 Athey et al. Dec 1998 A
5857983 Douglas et al. Jan 1999 A
5879311 Duchon et al. Mar 1999 A
6004441 Fujiwara et al. Dec 1999 A
6033866 Guo et al. Mar 2000 A
6071391 Gotoh et al. Jun 2000 A
6120676 Heller et al. Sep 2000 A
6143164 Heller et al. Nov 2000 A
6153069 Pottgen et al. Nov 2000 A
6287451 Winarta et al. Sep 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (84)
Number Date Country
29 03 216 Aug 1979 DE
227 029 Sep 1985 DE
0 048 090 Mar 1982 EP
0 078 636 May 1983 EP
0 096 288 Dec 1983 EP
0 125 139 Nov 1984 EP
0 136 362 Apr 1985 EP
0 170 375 Feb 1986 EP
0 080 304 May 1986 EP
0 184 909 Jun 1986 EP
0 206 218 Dec 1986 EP
0 230 472 Aug 1987 EP
0 241 309 Oct 1987 EP
0 245 073 Nov 1987 EP
0 278 647 Aug 1988 EP
0 286 084 Oct 1988 EP
0 359 831 Mar 1990 EP
0 368 209 May 1990 EP
0 390 390 Oct 1990 EP
0 400 918 Dec 1990 EP
0 453 283 Oct 1991 EP
0 470 290 Feb 1992 EP
0 255 291 Jun 1992 EP
0 537 761 Apr 1993 EP
0 127 958 Apr 1996 EP
0 781 406 May 1998 EP
1394 171 May 1975 GB
2 073 891 Oct 1981 GB
2 154 003 Aug 1985 GB
2 204 408 Nov 1988 GB
54-41191 Apr 1979 JP
55-10581 Jan 1980 JP
55-10583 Jan 1980 JP
55-10584 Jan 1980 JP
55-12406 Jan 1980 JP
56-163447 Dec 1981 JP
57-70448 Apr 1982 JP
60-173457 Sep 1985 JP
60-173458 Sep 1985 JP
60-173459 Sep 1985 JP
61-90050 May 1986 JP
62-85855 Apr 1987 JP
62-114747 May 1987 JP
63-58149 Mar 1988 JP
63-128252 May 1988 JP
63-139246 Jun 1988 JP
63-294799 Dec 1988 JP
63-317758 Dec 1988 JP
1-114746 May 1989 JP
1-114747 May 1989 JP
1-134244 May 1989 JP
1-156658 Jun 1989 JP
2-62958 Mar 1990 JP
2-120655 May 1990 JP
2-287145 Nov 1990 JP
2-310457 Dec 1990 JP
3-26956 Feb 1991 JP
3-28752 Feb 1991 JP
3-202764 Sep 1991 JP
5-72171 Mar 1993 JP
5-196595 Aug 1993 JP
11-108879 Apr 1999 JP
1281988 Jan 1987 SU
WO 8505119 Nov 1985 WO
WO 8908713 Sep 1989 WO
WO 9005300 May 1990 WO
WO 9104704 Apr 1991 WO
WO 9213271 Aug 1992 WO
WO 9420602 Sep 1994 WO
WO 9427140 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9502817 Jan 1995 WO
WO 9700441 Jan 1997 WO
WO 9718464 May 1997 WO
WO 9719344 May 1997 WO
WO 9742882 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9742883 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9742886 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9742888 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9743962 Nov 1997 WO
WO 9835225 Aug 1998 WO
WO 9843073 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9858250 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9908106 Feb 1999 WO
WO 9930152 Jun 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (133)
Entry
Abru{haeck over (n)}o. H. D. et al., “Rectifying Interfaces Using Two-Layer Films of Electrochemically Polymerized Vinylpyridine and Vinylbipyridine Complexes of Ruthenium and Iron on Electrodes.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103(1) 1-5 (Jan. 14, 1981).
Albery, W. J. et al., “Amperometric enzyme electrodes. Part II. Conducting salts as electrode materials for the oxidation of glucose oxidase,” J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 194(2) (1 page-Abstract only) (1985).
Albery, W. J. et al., “Amperometric Enzyme Electrodes,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B316:107-119 (1987).
Alcock, S. J. et al., “Continuous Analyte Monitoring to Aid Clinical Practice,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 319-325 (1994).
Anderson, L. B. et al., “Thin-Layer Electrochemistry Steady-State Methods of Studying Rate Processes.” J. Electroanal. Chem., 10:295-305 (1965).
Bartlett, P. N. et al., “Covalent Binding of Electron Relays to Glucose Oxidation.” J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun, 1603-1604 (1987).
Bartlett, P. N. et al., “Modification of glucose oxidase by letrathiafulvalene.” J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun, 16 (1 page-Abstract only) (1990).
Bartlett, P. N. et al., “Strategies for the Development of Amperometric Enzyme Electrodes,” Biosensors, 3:359-379 (1987/88).
Bobbioni-Harsch E. et al., “Lifespan of subcutaneous glucose sensors and their performances during dynamic glycaemia changes in rats,” J. Biomed. Eng., 15:457-463 (1993).
Brandt. J. et al., “Covalent attachment of proteins to polysaccharide carries by means of benzoquinone.” Biochim Biophys. Acta, 386(1) (1 page Abstract only) (1975).
Brownlee, M. et al., “A Glucose-Controlled Insulin-Delivery System Semisynthetic Insulin Bound to Lectin”, Science. 206(4423):1190-1191 (Dec. 7, 1979).
Cass, A.F.G. et al., “Ferricinum Ion As An Electron Acceptor for Oxide-Reductases,” J. Electroanal. Chem, 190:117-127 (1985).
Cass, A.F.G. et al., “Ferrocene-Mediated Enzyme Electrode for Amperometric Determination of Glucose”, Anal. Chem., 56(4):667-671 (Apr. 1984).
Castner. J. F. et al., “Mass Transport and Reaction Kinetic Parameters Determined ELectrochemically for Immobilized Glucose Oxidase.” Biochemistry. 23(10):2203-2210 (1984).
Claremont, D.J. et al., “Biosensors for Continuous In Vivo Glucose Monitoring”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 10th Annual International Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana, 3 pgs. (Nov. 4-7, 1988).
Chen, C.Y. et al., “A Biocompatible Needle-Type Glucose Sensor Based on Platinum-Electroplated Carbon Electrode”. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 36:211-226 (1992).
Chen, C.Y. et al., “Amperometric Needle-Type Glucose Sensor based on a Modified Platinum Electrode with Diminished Response to Interfering Materials”, Analytico Climica Acta, 265:5-14 (1992).
Clarks L.C. et al. “Differential Anodic Enzyme Polarography for the Measurement of Glucose”. Oxygen Transport to Tissue: Instrumentation, Methods, and Physiology, 127-133 (1973).
Clark, L.C., Jr. et al., “Electrode Systems for Continuous Monitoring in Cardiovascular Surgery.” Annals New York Academy of Sciences. pp. 29-45 (1962).
Clarke, W. L. et al., “Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.” Diabetes Care, 10(5):622-628 (Sep.-Oct. 1987).
Csöregi, E. et al., “Design, Characterization, and One-Point in Vivo Calibration of a Subcutaneously Implanted Glucose Electrode,” Anal. Chem. 66(19):3131-3138 (Oct. 1, 1994).
Csoregi, E. et al., “On-Line Glucose Monitoring by Using Microdialysis Sampling and Ampemmetric Detection Based on “Wired” Glucose Oxidase in Carbon Paste,” Mikrochim. Acta. 121:31-40 (1995).
Davis. G. “Electrochemical Techniques for the Development of Amperometric Biosensors”, Biosensors. 1:161-178 (1985).
Degani. Y. et al., “Direct Electrical Communication between Chemically Modified Enzymes and Metal Electrodes. 1. Electron Transfer from Glucose Oxidase to Metal Electrodes via Electron Relays. Bound Covalently to the Enzyme,” J. Phys. Chem., 91(6):1285-1289 (1987).
Degani. Y. et al., “Direct Electrical Communication between Chemically Modified Enzymes and Metal Electrodes. 2. Methods for Bonding Electron-Transfer Relays to Glucose Oxidase and D-Amino-Acid Oxidase,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110(8):2615-2620 (1988).
Degani. Y. et al., “Electrical Communication between Redox Centers of Glucose Oxidase and Electrodes via Electrostatically and Covalently Bound Redox Polymers,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111:2357-2358 (1989).
Denisevich, P. et al., “Unidirectional Current Flow and Charge State Trapping at Redox Polymer Interfaces on Bilayer Electrodes: Principles, Experimental Demonstration, and Theory,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103(16):4727-4737 (1981).
Dicks, J. M., “Ferrocene modified polypyrrole with immobilised glucose oxidase and its application in amperometric glucose microbiosensors,” Ann. Biol. clin., 47:607-619 (1989).
Engstrom, R.C., “Electrochemical Pretreatment of Glassy Carbon Electrodes”. Anal. Chem., 54(13) 2310-2314 (Nov. 1982).
Engstrom, R.C. et al., “Characterization of Electrochemically Pretreated Glassy Carbon Electrodes”, Anal. Chem. 56(2):136-141 (Feb. 1984).
Ellis, C. D., “Selectivity and Directed Charge Transfer through an Electroactive Metallopolymer Film,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103(25):7480-7483 (1981).
Fischer, II, et al., “Intramolecular Electron Transfer Mediated by 4.4′-Bipyridine and Related Bridging Groups”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98(18):5512-5517 (Sep. 1, 1976).
Foulds, N.C. et al., “Enzyme Entrapment in Electrically Conducting Polymers,” J. Chem. Soc., Faradoy Trans 1., 82 1259-1264 (1986).
Foulds, N.C. et al., “Immobilzation of Glucose Oxidase in Ferrocene-Modified Pyrrole Polymers.” Anal. Chem., 60(22):2473-2478 (Nov. 15, 1988).
Frew. J.E. et al., “Electron-Transfer Biosensors”, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B316:95-106 (1987).
Gernet. S. et al., “Fabrication and Characterization of a Planar Electrochemical Cell and Its Application as a Glucose Sensor”. Brasensors & Actuators, 18:59-70 (1989).
Gorton. I., et al., “Selective detection in flow analysis based on the combination of immobilized enzymes and chemically modified electrodes.” Analytica Chimica Acta., 250 203-248 (1991).
Gregg. B. A. et al., “Cross-Linked Redox Gels Containing Glucose Oxidase for Amperometric Biosensor Applications.” Analytical Chemistry, 62(3):258-263 (Feb. 1, 1990).
Gregg, B. A. et al., “Redox Polymer Films Containing Enzymes. I. A Redox-Conducting Epoxy Cement: Synthesis, Characterization and Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Hydroquinone,” J. Phys. Chem., 95(15):5970-5975 (1991).
Hale, P.D. et al., “A New Class of Amperometric Biosensor Incorporating a Polymeric Electron-Transfer Mediator.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111(9):3482-3484 (1989).
Harrison, D.J. et al., “Characterization of Perfluorosulfonic Acid Polymer Coated Enzyme Electrodes and a Miniaturized Integrated Potentiostat for Glucose Analysis in Whole Blood”, Anal. Chem., 60(19):2002-2007 (Oct. 1, 1988).
Hawkridge, F.M. et al., “Indirect Coulometric Titration of Biological Electron Transport Components.” Analytical Chemistry, 45(7):1021-1027 (Jun. 1973).
Heineman, W.R. et al., “Measurement of Enzyme E Values by Optically Transparent Thin Layer Electrochemical Cells”, Analytical Chemistry, 47(1):79, 82-84 (Jan. 1975).
Heineman, W.R. “Spectro-electro-chemistry”. Analytical Chemistry, 50(3):390-392, 394, 396, 398, 400, 402 (Mar. 1978).
Heller, A., “Amperometric biosensors based on three-dimensional hydrogel-forming epoxy networks,” Sensors and Actuators B, 13-14:180-183 (1993).
Heller, A., “Electrical Connection of Enzyme Redox Centers to Electrodes,” J. Phys. Chem., 96(9) 3579-3587 (1992).
Heller, A., “Electrical Wiring of Redox Enzymes,” Acc. Chem. Res., 23(5):129-134 (1990).
Ianniello. R.M. et al., “Immobilized Enzyme Chemically Modified Electrode as an Amperometric Sensor”, Anal. Chem., 53(13):2090-2095 (Nov. 1981).
Ianniello, R.M. et al., “Differential Pulse Voltammetric Study of Direct Electron Transfer in Glucose Oxidase Chemically Modified Graphic Electrodes”, Anal. Chem., 54:(7):1098-1101 (Jun. 1981).
Ikeda, T. et al., “Glucose oxidase-immobilized benzoquinone-carbon paste electrode as a glucose sensor”, Agric. Biol. Chem., 49(2) (1 page-Abstract only) (1985).
Johnson, J. M. et al., “Potential-Dependent Enzymatic Activity in an Enzyme Thin-Layer Cell.” Anal. Chem. 54:1377-1383 (1982).
Johnson K. W. et al., “In Vivo Evaluation of an Electroenzymatic Glucose Sensor Implanted in Subculaneous Tissue”, Biosensors & bioelectronics 7:709-714 (1992).
Johnson, K.W., “Reproducible Electrodeposition of Biomolecules for the Fabrication of Minature Electroenzymatic Biosensors”. Sensors and Actuators B Chemical. B5:85-89 (1991).
Jonsson G. et al., “An Amperometric Glucose Sensor Made by Modification of a Graphite Electrode Surface With Immobilized Glucose Oxidase and Adsorbed Mediator”. Biosensors, 1:355-368 (1985).
Josovicz, M. et al., “Electrochemical Pretrentment of Thin Film Platinum Electrodes”, J. Electrochem Soc., 135(1):112-115 (Jan. 1988).
Katakis. I. et al., “Electrostatic Control of the Electron Transfer Enabling Binding of Recombinant Glucose Oxidase and Redox Polyeletrolytes.” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116(8):3617-3618 (1994).
Katakis, I. et al., “I-α-Glycerophosphate and L-Lactate Electrodes Based on the Electrochemical “Wiring” of Oxidases.” Analytical Chemistry, 64(9):1008-1013 (May 1, 1992).
Kenausis, G. et al. “Wiring of glucose oxidase and lactate oxidase within a hydrogel made with poly(vinyl pyridine) complexed with [Os(4,4′-dimethoxy-2,2′-bipyridine)2CI]+/2+.” J. Chem. Soc., Faroday Trans., 92(20):4131-4136 (1996).
Kondo, T. et al., “A Miniature Glucose Sensor, Implantable in the Blood Stream”. Diabetes Care, 5(3):218-221 (May-Jun. 1982).
Kulys, J. et al., “Mediatorless peroxidase electrode and preparation of bienzyme sensors,” Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 24 305-311 (1990).
Lager, W. et al., “Implantable Electrocatalytic Glucose Sensor,” Horn. Metab. Res., 26:526-530 (Nov. 1994).
Lee, J. et al., “A New Glucose Sensor using Microporous Enzyme Membrane”, Sensors and Actuators, B3:215-219 (1991).
Lewandowski, J.J. et al., “Evaluation of a Miniature Blood Glucose Sensor”, Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs, XXXIV:255-258 (1988).
Lindner. E. et al., “Flexible (Kapton-Based) Microsensor Arrays of High Stability for Cardiovascular Applications”, J. Chem. Soc. Faroday Trans., 89(2):361-367 (Jan. 21, 1993).
Maidan, R. et al., “Elimination of Electrooxidizable Interferant-Produced Currents in Amperometric Biosensors,” Analytical Chemistry, 64(23):2889-2896 (Dec. 1, 1992).
Mann-Buxbaum, E. et al., “New Microminiaturized Glucose Sensors Using Covalent Immobilzation Techniques”, Sensors and Actuators. B1:518-522 (1990).
Mastrototaro, J.J. et al., “An Electrocnzymatic Glucose Sensor Fabricated on a Flexible Substrate”. Sensors and Biosensors B Chemical, B5:139-144 (1991).
Matthews, D.R., et al., “An Amperometric Needle-Type Glucose Sensor Tested in Rats and Man”, Original Articles, pp. 248-252 (1988).
McKean et al., “A telemetry-Instrumentation System for Chronically Implanted Glucose and Oxygen Sensors”, IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering. 35(7):526-532 (Jul. 1988).
McNeil, C. J. et al., “Thermostable Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Oxidase. Application to Amperometric Enzyme Assay,” Anal. Chem., 61(1):25-29 (Jan. 1, 1989).
Miyawaki, O. et al., “Electrochemical and Glucose Oxidase Coenzyme Activity of Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide Covalently Attached to Glassy Carbon at the Adenine Amino Group”, Biochimco et Biophysica Acta., 838:60-68 (1985).
Moalti-Sirat, D. et al., “Evaluating in vitro and in vivo the inteference of ascorbate and acetaminophen on glucose detection by a needle-type glucose sensor,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 7(5):345-352 (1992).
Moalti-Sirat, D. et al., “Reduction of acetaminophen interference in glucose sensors by a composite Nafion membrane: demonstration in rats and man,” Diabetologia, 37(6) (1 page-Abstract only) (Jun. 1994).
Moalti-Sirat, D. et al., “Towards continuous glucose monitoring: in vivo evaluation of a miniaturized glucose sensor implanted for several days in rat subcutaneous tissue,” Diabetologia, 35(3) (1 page-Abstract only) (Mar. 1992).
Moser, I et al., “Advanced Immobilization and Protein Techniques on thin Film Biosensors”, Sensors and Actuators, B7:356-362 (1992).
Moussey, F. et al., “Performance of Subcutaneously Implanted Needle-Type Glucose Sensors Employing a Novel Trilayer Coating”, Anal. Chem., 65:2072-2077 (1993).
Nugy, G. et al., “A New Type of Enzyme Electrode: The Ascorbic Acid Eliminator Electrode,” Life Sciences. 31(23):2611-2616 (1982).
Nakamura, S. et al., “Effect of Periodate Oxidation on the Structure and Properties of Gluocse Oxidase,” Biochimica et Biphysica Acta., 445:294-308 (1976).
Narazimhan, K. et al., “p-Benzoquinone activation of metal oxide electrodes for attachment of enzymes,” Enzyme Microb. Technol., 7(6) (1 page-Abstract only) (1985).
Ohara, T. J. et al., “Glucose Electrodes Based on Cross-Linked [Os(bpy)2Ci]+/2+ Complexed Poly(1-vinylimadazole) Films.” Analytical Chemistry, 65(23):3512-3516 (Dec. 1, 1993).
Ohara, T. J., “Osmium Bipyridyl Redox Polymers Used in Enzyme Electrodes,” Platinum Metals Rev., 39(2):54-62 (Apr. 1995).
Ohara, T. J. et al., “Wired” Enzyme Electrodes for Amperometric Determination of Glucose or Lactate in the Presence of Interfering Substances, Analytical Chemistry, 66(15):2451-2457 (Aug. 1, 1994).
Ohevier, C. N. et al., “In vivo Measurement of Carbon Dioxide Tension with a Miniature Electrode,” Pflagers Arch. 373:269-272 (1978).
Paddock, R. et al., “Electrocatalytic reduction of hydrogen peroxide via direct electron transfer from pyralytic graphite electrodes to irreversibly adsorbed cytochrome c peroxidase,” J. Electromal. Chem., 260:487-494 (1989).
Palleschi. G. et al., “A Study of Interferences in Glucose Measurements in Blood by Hydrogen Peroxide Based Glucose Probes”, Anal. Biochem. 159:114-121 (1986).
Palleschi. G. et al., “Ideal Hydrogen Peroxide-Based Glucose Sensor”, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 31:21-35 (1991).
Pankratov. I. et al., “Sol-gel derived renewable-surface biosensors,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 393 35-41 (1995).
Pathak, C. P. et al., “Rapid Photopolymerization of Immunoprotective Gels in Contact with Cells and Tissue,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114(21):8311-8312 (1992).
Pickup, J. et al., “Potentially-implantable amperometric glucose sensors with mediated electron transfer: improving the operating stability,” Biosensors, 4(2) (1 page-Abstract only) (1989).
Pishko, M.V. et al., “Amperometric Glucose Microelectrodes Prepared Through Immobilization of Glucose Oxidase in Redox Hydrogels”. Anal. Chem. 63(20):2268-2272 (Oct. 15, 1991).
Poitout, V. et al., “A glucose monitoring system for on line estimation in man of blood glucose concentration using a miniaturized glucose sensor implanted in the subcutaneous tissue and a wearable control unit,” Diahetolgia, 36(7) (1 page-Abstract only) (Jul. 1993).
Poitout, V. et al., “Calibration in dogs of a subcutaneous miniaturized glucose sensor using a glucose meter for blood glucose determination,” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 7:587-592 (1992).
Poitout, V. et al., “In vitro and in vivo evaluation in dogs of a miniaturized glucose sensor,” ASAIO Transactions,. 37(3) (1 page-Abstract only) (Jul.-Sep. 1991).
Pollak, A. et al., “Enzyme Immobilization by Condensation Copolymerization into Cross-Linked Polyacrylamide Gels,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102(20):6324-6336 (1980).
Pons. B. S. et al., “Application of Deposited Thin Metal Films as Optically Transparent Electrodes for Internal Reflection Spectometric Observation of Electrode Solution Interfaces”, Analytical Chemistry. 39(6):685-688 (May 1967).
Reach, G. et al., “A Method for Evaluating in vivo the Functional Characteristics of Glucose Sensors”, Biosensors 2:211-220 (1986).
Reach, G. et al., “Can Continuous Glucose Monitoring Be Used for the Treatment of Diabetes?” Analytical Chemistry, 64(6):381-386 (Mar. 15, 1992).
Rebrin, K. et al., “Automated Feedback Control of Subcutaneous Glucose Concentration in Diabetic Dogs”, Diabetologia, 32(8):573-576 (Aug. 1989).
Sasso, S. V. et al., “Electropolymerized 1.2-Diaminobenzene as a Means to Prevent Interferences and Fouling and to Stabilize Immobilized Enzyme in Electrochemical Biosensors”. Anal. Chem., 62(11):1111-1117 (Jun. 1, 1990).
Schalkhammer, T. et al., “Electrochemical Glucose Sensors on Permselective Non-conducting Substitued Pyrrole Polymers”, Sensors and Actuators, B4:273-281 (1991).
Scheller, F. et al., “Enzyme electrodes and their application,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B316:85-94 (1987).
Shichiri, M. et al., “Glyeacmic Control in Pancroatetomized Dogs with a Wearable Artifical Endocrine Pancreas”. Diabetologia, 24(3):179-184 (Mar. 1983).
Shigeru, T. et al., “Simultaneous Determination of Glucse and 1.5-= Anydroglucital”, Chemical Abstracts. 111:394 (1989).
Sittampalam. G. et al., “Surface-Modified Electrochemical Detector for Liquid Chromatography”, Anal. Chem., 55(9):1608-1610 (Aug. 1983).
Soegijoko. S. et al., Horn. Metabl. Res., Suppl. Ser. 12 (1 page-Abstract only) (1982).
Sprules, S. D. et al., “Evaluation of a New Disposable Screen-Printed Sensor Strip for the Measurement of NADH and Its Modification to Produce a Lactate Biosensor Employing Microliter Volumes.” Electroanalysis, 8(6):539-543 (1996).
Sternberg, F. et al., “Calibration Problems of Subcutaneous Glucosensors when Applied “In-Situ” in Man,” Horm. metabl. Res. 26:523-525 (1994).
Sternberg, R. et al., “Covalent Enzyme Coupling on Cellulose Acetate Membranes for Glucose Sensor Development.” Analytical Chemistry. 60(24):2781-2786 (Dec. 15, 1988).
Suckane. M., “Immobilzation of glucose isomerase,” Zeitschrift fir Allgemeine Mikrohiologie, 22(8):565-576 (1982).
Tarasevich. M.R. “Bioelectrocatalysis”.Comprehensive Treative of Electrochemistry. 10(Ch. 4):231-295 (1985).
Taylor, C. et al., “Wiring of gluocse oxidase within a hydrogel made with polyvinyl imidazole complexed with [(Os-4,4′-dimethoxy-2,2′-bipyridine)Cl]+/2+.” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 396:511-515 (1995).
Trojanowicz, M. et al., “Enzyme Entrapped polypyrrole Modified Electrode for Flow-Injection Determination of Glucose.” Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 5:149-156 (1990).
Turner, A.P.F. et al., “Diabetes Mcllitus: Biosensors for Research and Management”, Biosensors. 1:85-115 (1985).
Turner, R.F.B. et al., “A Biocompatible Enzyme Electrode for Continuous in vivo Glucose Monitoring in Whole Blood,” Sensors and Actuators. B1(1-6):561-564 (Jan. 1990).
Umaba M., “Protein-Modified Electrochemically Active Biomaterial Surface.” U.S. Army Research Office Report, (12 pages) (Dec. 1988).
Urban, G. et al., “Miniaturized Thin-Film Biosensors Using Covalently Immobilized Glucose Oxidase”, Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 6(7):555-562 (1991).
Velho, G. et al., “Strategies for calibrating a subcutaneous glucose sensor.” Biomed. Biochin. Acta, 48(11/12):957-964 (1989).
Von Woedke. T. et al., “In Situ Calibration of Implanted Electrochemical Glucose Sensors.” Biomed. Biochim. Acta, 48(11/12):943-952 (1989).
Vrecke M. S. et al., “Chapter 15: Hydrogen Peroxide Electrodes Based on Electrical Connection of Redox Centers of Various peroxidases to Electrodes through a Three-Dimensional Electron-Relaying Polymer Network.” Diagnostic Biosensor Polymers, 7 pgs. (Jul. 26, 1993).
Vrecke M. et al., “Hydrogen Peroxide and β-Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Sensing Amperometric Electrodes Based on Electrical Connection of Horseradish Peroxidase Redox Centers to Electrodes through a Three-Dimensional Electron Relaying Polymer Network,” Analyical Chemistry. 64(24):3084-3090 (Dec. 15, 1992).
Wang, J. et al., “Activation of Glassy Carbon Electrodes by Alternating Current Electrochemical Treatment”. Analytica Chimica Acta. 167:325-334 (Jan. 1985).
Wang J. et al., “Amperometric biosensing of organic peroxides with peroxidase-modified electrodes,” Analytica Chimica Acta. 254:81-88 (1991).
Wang, J. et al., “Screen-Printable Sol-Gel Enzyme-Containing Carbon Inks,” Analytical Chemistry. 68(15):2705-2708 (Aug. 1, 1996).
Wang, J. et al., “Sol-Gel-Derived Metal-Dispersed Carbon Composite Amperometric Biosensors.” Electroanalysis. 9(1):52-55 (1997).
Williams, D.L. et al., “Electrochemical-Enzymatic Analysis of Blood Glucose and Lactate”. Anal. Chem. 42(1):118-121 (Jan. 1970).
Yabuki, S. et al., “Electro-conductive Enzyme Membrane,” J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 945-946 (1989).
Yamasaki, Y., “The Development of a Needle-Type Glucose Sensor for Wearable Artifical Endocrine Pancreas”, Medical Journal of Osaka University, vol. 35, No. 1-2, pp. 24-34 (Sep. 1994).
Yang, I. et al., “Determination of Oxidase Enzyme Substrates Using Cross-Flow Thin-Layer Amperometry,” Electroanalysis, 8(8-9):716-721 (1996).
Yao, S.J. et al., “The Interference of Ascorbate and Urea in Low-Potential Electrochemical Glucose Sensing”. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 12(2):487-489 (Nov. 1-4, 1990).
Yao, T. et al., “A Chemically-Modified Enzyme Membrane Electrode As An Amperometric Glucose Sensor.” Analytica Chimica Acta, 148:27-33 (1983).
Ye, I. et al., “High Current Density “Wired” Quinoprotein Glucose Dehydrogenase Electrode.” Anal. Chem., 65(3):238-241 (Feb. 1, 1993).
Yildiz, A., “Evaluation of an Improved Thin-Layer Electrode”, Analytical Chemistry, 40(7):1018-1024 (Jun. 1968).
Zamzow. K. et al., New Wearable Continuous Blood Glucose Monitor (BGM) and Artificial Pancreas (AP), Diabetes. 39:5A(20) (May 1990).
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/434026 Nov 1999 US
Child 10/033575 US