The present invention relates generally to the field of building management systems. The present invention more particularly relates to systems and methods for integrating a building management system with smart grid components and data.
In a smart grid, the switching points in the grid, as well as several other points distributed throughout the grid, include microprocessor driven controls configured to automatically reconfigure the circuits and communicate bi-directional information. The communicated information can be carried over the power distribution grid itself or other communication mediums (e.g., wireless, optical, wired, etc.).
A smart grid is a key element of a comprehensive strategy to increase energy reliability and efficiency, reduce energy costs, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. The large portion of smart grid R&D efforts today are focused on creating the digital communications architecture and distribution management infrastructure connecting power plant and utility-scale energy resources with distributed meters.
One embodiment of the invention relates to a building manager. The building manager includes a communications interface configured to receive information from a smart energy grid. The building manager further includes an integrated control layer configured to receive inputs from and to provide outputs to a plurality of building subsystems. The integrated control layer includes a plurality of control algorithm modules configured to process the inputs and to determine the outputs. The building manager further includes a fault detection and diagnostics layer configured to use the inputs received from the integrated control layer to detect and diagnose faults. The building manager also includes a demand response layer configured to process the information received from the smart energy grid to determine adjustments to the plurality of control algorithms of the integrated control layer. The fault detection and diagnostics layer may detect and diagnose faults using at least one of statistical analysis, rule-based analysis, and model-based analysis.
The building manager may include an automated measurement and validation layer configured to measure energy use or track energy savings based on representations of the inputs stored in memory according to an international performance management and verification protocol (IPMVP).
The building manager may further include an enterprise applications layer configured to provide services to enterprise level applications for communicating with the integrated control layer, the fault detection and diagnostics layer, the demand response layer, and the automated measurement and validation layer. The enterprise applications layer may include a web services interface configured to receive requests from enterprise applications and to respond to the requests.
The smart energy grid may include at least one of (a) a smart meter configured to receive time-of-use pricing information wherein the information received by the communications interface is the time-of-use pricing information, and (b) energy providers and purchasers configured to provide daily or hourly time-of-use pricing information to the communications interface.
The demand response layer may be configured to curtail energy use of the plurality of building subsystems based on the time-of-use pricing information. The demand response layer may be further configured to receive energy availability information from at least one of a local energy generation source, remote energy generation source, a distributed energy generation source, a local energy storage system, and a remote energy storage system. The demand response layer may yet further be configured to use the energy availability information in its processing of the information received from the smart energy grid to determine the adjustments to the plurality of control algorithms of the integrated control layers. The demand response layer may also be configured to cause a building electrical system to use power from the at least one of a local energy generation source, a distributed energy generation source, a local energy storage system, and a remote energy storage system to power one or more loads normally powered by the smart energy grid. Yet further, the demand response layer may be configured to provide power to the smart energy grid from at least one of a local energy generation source, a distributed energy generation source, a local energy storage system, and a remote energy storage system. The demand response layer may be configured to provide the power to the smart energy grid when the power may be sold to the smart energy grid for a profit. The demand response layer may be configured to compare the time-of-use pricing information to cost information associated with the at least one of a local energy generation source, a distributed energy generation source, a local energy storage system, and a remote energy storage system during its processing. The demand response module may be configured to bi-directionally communicate with the smart energy grid via the communications interface and the demand response module may be configured to communicate data regarding the energy use anticipated by the building management system to the smart energy grid. Processing the information by the demand response layer and received from the smart energy grid may include comparing pricing information to threshold information associated with adjustments for the plurality of control algorithms. The adjustments for the plurality of control algorithms may be tiered or prioritized such that high priority building subsystems and devices are not affected by the time-of-use pricing information to the extent that lower priority building subsystems and devices are affected. The tiering information or prioritization information used by the demand response module may be stored in memory and the building management system may further include a web service configured to receive updates to the tiering information or prioritization information. The web service may be configured to provide information for generating a graphical user interface to a client. The graphical user interface may be configured to prompt a user for updates to the tiering information or prioritization information.
The communications interface may be a power line carrier interface, an Ethernet interface, another wired interface, or a wireless interface. The building manager includes at least one processing circuit and at least one memory device. The integrated control layer, the fault detection and diagnostics layer, and the demand response layer may each be computer code modules stored in the memory device. In other embodiments the computer code modules may be distributed across different memory devices. The computer code modules configure the processing circuit to provide the functions of the integrated control layer, the fault detection and diagnostics layer, and the demand response layer.
The automated measurement and validation layer is configured to validate an energy consumption measurement against data received from another calculation or source. The automated measurement and validation layer may further be configured to store pricing data received from the smart energy grid and to use the stored pricing data to compute an energy cost savings for a control strategy or for a period of time. The automated measurement and validation layer may further be configured to validate the calculated energy cost savings using a standardized energy savings calculation method. The automated measurement and validation layer may be configured to monitor energy consumption for a building based on inputs from building subsystems. In some embodiments the automated measurement and validation layer may complete a calculation of energy consumption for the building without using inputs from a utility meter or power provider. The automated measurement and validation layer may be configured to validate energy use information provided by a utility or meter using the calculation of energy consumption for the building that is calculated without using inputs from the utility meter or power provider. The automated measurement and validation layer may be configured to calculate greenhouse gas emissions for the building. The automated measurement and validation layer may further be configured to convert the calculated greenhouse gas emissions into a tradable credit. The automated measurement and validation layer may yet further be configured to provide information about the tradable credit to a remote source via the communications interface or another communications interface. The automated measurement and validation layer may further be configured to receive at least one of a trade confirmation message and a trade offer message from the remote source via the communications interface or the other communications interface. Yet further, the automated measurement and validation layer may be configured to complete a transaction using the tradable credit and the trade confirmation message or trade offer message from the remote source. The automated measurement and validation layer may be included within the same server as the integrated control layer, the fault detection and diagnostics layer, and the demand response layer.
The integrated control layer may be configured to use inputs from the smart energy grid, building energy loads, and/or building energy storage in a control algorithm configured to reduce energy costs based on the received inputs. The demand response layer may be configured to adjust or affect the control algorithm of the integrated control layer by planning a control strategy based on received real time pricing (RTP) information or forecasted pricing information for energy from a utility. The demand response layer may further be configured to calculate an estimate of demand loads for the building for upcoming time periods based on at least one of historical information, forecasted pricing, scheduled facility control events, and inputs from the building's subsystems. The demand response layer may yet further be configured to provide the calculated estimate of demand loads for the building to the smart energy grid for an energy provider. The building subsystem integration layer may be configured to translate communications from a plurality of disparately protocolled building devices or subsystems for use by the integrated control layer as inputs.
Alternative exemplary embodiments relate to other features and combinations of features as may be generally recited in the claims.
The disclosure will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:
The present invention relates to a building management system configured to improve building efficiency, to enable greater use of renewable energy sources, and to provide more comfortable and productive buildings.
A building management system (BMS) is, in general, hardware and/or software configured to control, monitor, and manage devices in or around a building or building area. BMS subsystems or devices can include heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) subsystems or devices, security subsystems or devices, lighting subsystems or devices, fire alerting subsystems or devices, elevator subsystems or devices, other devices that are capable of managing building functions, or any combination thereof.
Referring now to
Each of building subsystems 128 include any number of devices, controllers, and connections for completing their individual functions and control activities. For example, HVAC subsystem 140 may include a chiller, a boiler, any number of air handling units, economizers, field controllers, supervisory controllers, actuators, temperature sensors, or other devices for controlling the temperature within a building. As another example, lighting subsystem 142 may include any number of light fixtures, ballasts, lighting sensors, dimmers, or other devices configured to controllably adjust the amount of light provided to a building space. Security subsystem 138 may include occupancy sensors, video surveillance cameras, digital video recorders, video processing servers, intrusion detection devices, access control devices and servers, or other security-related devices.
In an exemplary embodiment, the smart building manager 106 is configured to include: a communications interface 107 to the smart grid 104 outside the building, an interface 109 to disparate subsystems 128 within a building (e.g., HVAC, lighting security, lifts, power distribution, business, etc.), and an interface to applications 120, 124 (network or local) for allowing user control, and the monitoring and adjustment of the smart building manager 106 or subsystems 128. Enterprise control applications 124 may be configured to provide subsystem-spanning control to a graphical user interface (GUI) or to any number of enterprise-level business applications (e.g., accounting systems, user identification systems, etc.). Enterprise control applications 124 may also or alternatively be configured to provide configuration GUIs for configuring the smart building manager 106. In yet other embodiments enterprise control applications 124 can work with layers 110-118 to optimize building performance (e.g., efficiency, energy use, comfort, or safety) based on inputs received at the interface 107 to the smart grid and the interface 109 to building subsystems 128. In an exemplary embodiment smart building manager 106 is integrated within a single computer (e.g., one server, one housing, etc.). In various other exemplary embodiments the smart building manager 106 can be distributed across multiple servers or computers (e.g., that can exist in distributed locations).
Communications interfaces 107, 109 can be or include wired or wireless interfaces (e.g., jacks, antennas, transmitters, receivers, transceivers, wire terminals, etc.) for conducting data communications with, e.g., smart grid 104, energy providers and purchasers 102, building subsystems 128, or other external sources via a direct connection or a network connection (e.g., an Internet connection, a LAN, WAN, or WLAN connection, etc.). For example, communications interfaces 107, 109 can include an Ethernet card and port for sending and receiving data via an Ethernet-based communications link or network. In another example, communications interfaces 107, 109 can include a WiFi transceiver for communicating via a wireless communications network. In another example, one or both of interfaces 107, 109 may include cellular or mobile phone communications transceivers. In one embodiment communications interface 107 is a power line communications interface and communications interface 109 is an Ethernet interface. In other embodiments, both communications interface 107 and communications interface 109 are Ethernet interfaces or are the same Ethernet interface. Further, while
Building Subsystem Integration Layer
Referring further to
In
Using message format and content normalization component 202, the building subsystem integration layer 118 can be configured to provide a service-oriented architecture for providing cross-subsystem control activities and cross-subsystem applications. The message format and content normalization component 202 can be configured to provide a relatively small number of straightforward interfaces (e.g., application programming interfaces (APIs)) or protocols (e.g., open protocols, unified protocols, common protocols) for use by layers 108-116 (shown in
Once the building subsystem integration layer 118 is configured, developers of applications may be provided with a software development kit to allow rapid development of applications compatible with the smart building manager (e.g., with an application-facing protocol or API of the building subsystem integration layer). Such an API or application-facing protocol may be exposed at the enterprise integration layer 108 shown in
Integrated Control Layer
Referring further to
While conventional building subsystem controllers are only able to process inputs that are directly relevant to the performance of their own control loops, the integrated control layer 116 is configured to use an input from a first subsystem to make an energy-saving control decision for a second subsystem. Results of these decisions can be communicated back to the building subsystem integration layer 116 via, for example, the message format and content normalization component 202 shown in
The integrated control layer 116 is shown to be logically below the demand response layer 112. The integrated control layer 116 is configured to enhance the effectiveness of the demand response layer 112 by enabling building subsystems 128 and their respective control loops to be controlled in coordination with the demand response layer 112. This configuration may advantageously provide much less disruptive demand response behavior than conventional systems. For example, the integrated control layer 116 may be configured to assure that a demand response-driven upward adjustment to the setpoint for chilled water temperature (or another component that directly or indirectly affects temperature) does not result in an increase in fan energy (or other energy used to cool a space) that would result in greater total building energy use than was saved at the chiller. The integrated control layer 116 may also be configured to provide feedback to the demand response layer 112 so that the demand response layer 112 may check that constraints (e.g., temperature, lighting levels, etc.) are properly maintained even while demanded load shedding is in progress. The constraints may also include setpoint or sensed boundaries relating to safety, equipment operating limits and performance, comfort, fire codes, electrical codes, energy codes, and the like. The integrated control layer 116 is also logically below the fault detection and diagnostics layer 114 and the automated measurement and validation layer 110. The integrated control layer may be configured to provide calculated inputs (e.g., aggregations) to these “higher levels” based on outputs from more than one building subsystem.
Control activities that may be completed by the integrated control layer 116 (e.g., software modules or control algorithms thereof) include occupancy-based control activities. Security systems such as radio frequency location systems (RFLS), access control systems, and video surveillance systems can provide detailed occupancy information to the integrated control layer 116 and other building subsystems 128 via the smart building manager 106 (and more particularly, via the building subsystem integration layer 118). Integration of an access control subsystem and a security subsystem for a building may provide detailed occupancy data for consumption by the integrated control layer 116 (e.g., beyond binary “occupied” or “unoccupied” data available to some conventional HVAC systems that rely on, for example, a motion sensor). For example, the exact number of occupants in the building (or building zone, floor, conference room, etc.) may be provided to the integrated control layer 116 or aggregated by the integrated control layer 116 using inputs from a plurality of subsystems. The exact number of occupants in the building can be used by the integrated control layer 116 to determine and command appropriate adjustments for building subsystems 128 (such as HVAC subsystem 140 or lighting subsystem 142). Integrated control layer 116 may be configured to use the number of occupants, for example, to determine how many of the available elevators to activate in a building. If the building is only 20% occupied, the integrated control layer 116, for example, may be configured to power down 80% of the available elevators for energy savings. Further, occupancy data may be associated with individual workspaces (e.g., cubicles, offices, desks, workstations, etc.) and if a workspace is determined to be unoccupied by the integrated control layer, a control algorithm of the integrated control layer 116 may allow for the energy using devices serving the workspace to be turned off or commanded to enter a low power mode. For example, workspace plug-loads, task lighting, computers, and even phone circuits may be affected based on a determination by the integrated control layer that the employee associated with the workspace is on vacation (e.g., using data inputs received from a human-resources subsystem). Significant electrical loads may be shed by the integrated control layer 116, including, for example, heating and humidification loads, cooling and dehumidification loads, ventilation and fan loads, electric lighting and plug loads (e.g. with secondary thermal loads), electric elevator loads, and the like. The integrated control layer 116 may further be configured to integrate an HVAC subsystem or a lighting subsystem with sunlight shading devices or other “smart window” technologies. Natural day-lighting can significantly offset lighting loads but for optimal comfort may be controlled by the integrated control layer to prevent glare or over-lighting. Conversely, shading devices and smart windows may also be controlled by the integrated control layer 116 to calculably reduce solar heat gains in a building space—which can have a significant impact on cooling loads. Using feedback from sensors in the space, and with knowledge of the HVAC control strategy, the integrated control layer 116 may further be configured to control the transmission of infrared radiation into the building, minimizing thermal transmission when the HVAC subsystem is cooling and maximizing thermal transmission when the HVAC subsystem is heating. As a further example of an occupancy-based control strategy that may be implemented by the integrated control layer 116, inputs from a video security subsystem may be analyzed by a control algorithm of the integrated control layer 116 to make a determination regarding occupancy of a building space. Using the determination, the control algorithm may turn off the lights, adjust HVAC set points, power-down ICT devices serving the space, reduce ventilation, and the like—enabling energy savings with an acceptable loss of comfort to occupants of the building space.
Referring now to
Building subsystems 128, external sources such as smart grid 104, and internal layers such as demand response layer 112 can regularly generate events (e.g., messages, alarms, changed values, etc.) and provide the events to integrated control layer 116 or another layer configured to handle the particular event. For example, demand response (DR) events (e.g., a change in real time energy pricing) may be provided to smart building manager 106 as Open Automated Demand Response (“OpenADR”) messages (a protocol developed by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories). The DR messages may be received by OpenADR adapter 306 (which may be a part of enterprise application layer 108 shown in
Service bus adapter 304 may be configured to “trap” or otherwise receive the DR event on the service bus 302 and forward the DR event on to demand response layer 112. Service bus adapter 304 may be configured to queue, mediate, or otherwise manage demand response messages for demand response layer 112. Once a DR event is received by demand response layer 112, logic thereof can generate a control trigger in response to processing the DR event. The integrated control engine 308 of integrated control layer 116 is configured to parse the received control trigger to determine if a control strategy exists in control strategy database 310 that corresponds to the received control trigger. If a control strategy exists, integrated control engine 308 executes the stored control strategy for the control trigger. In some cases the output of the integrated control engine 308 will be an “apply policy” message for business rules engine 312 to process. Business rules engine 312 may process an “apply policy” message by looking up the policy in business rules database 314. A policy in business rules database 314 may take the form of a set of action commands for sending to building subsystems 128. The set of action commands may include ordering or scripting for conducting the action commands at the correct timing, ordering, or with other particular parameters. When business rules engine 312 processes the set of action commands, therefore, it can control the ordering, scripting, and other parameters of action commands transmitted to the building subsystems 128.
Action commands may be commands for relatively direct consumption by building subsystems 128, commands for other applications to process, or relatively abstract cross-subsystem commands. Commands for relatively direct consumption by building subsystems 128 can be passed through service bus adapter 322 to service bus 302 and to a subsystem adapter 314 for providing to a building subsystem in a format particular to the building subsystem. Commands for other applications to process may include commands for a user interface application to request feedback from a user, a command to generate a work order via a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) application, a command to generate a change in an ERP application, or other application level commands.
More abstract cross-subsystem commands may be passed to a semantic mediator 316 which performs the task of translating those actions to the specific commands required by the various building subsystems 128. For example, a policy might contain an abstract action to “set lighting zone X to maximum light.” The semantic mediator 316 may translate this action to a first command such as “set level to 100% for lighting object O in controller C” and a second command of “set lights to on in controller Z, zone_id_no 3141593.” In this example both lighting object O in controller C and zone_id_no 3141593 in controller Z may affect lighting in zone X. Controller C may be a dimming controller for accent lighting while controller Z may be a non-dimming controller for the primary lighting in the room. The semantic mediator 316 is configured to determine the controllers that relate to zone X using ontology database 320. Ontology database 320 stores a representation or representations of relationships (the ontology) between building spaces and subsystem elements and subsystems elements and concepts of the integrated building supersystem. Using the ontology stored in ontology database 320, the semantic mediator can also determine that controller C is dimming and requires a numerical percentage parameter while controller Z is not dimming and requires only an on or off command. Configuration tool 162 can allow a user to build the ontology of ontology database 320 by establishing relationships between subsystems, building spaces, input/output points, or other concepts/objects of the building subsystems and the building space.
Events other than those received via OpenADR adapter 306, demand response layer 112, or any other specific event-handing mechanism can be trapped by subsystem adapter 314 (a part of building integration subsystem layer 318) and provided to a general event manager 330 via service bus 302 and a service bus adapter. By the time an event from a building subsystem 128 is received by event manager 330, it may have been converted into a unified event (i.e., “common event,” “standardized event”, etc.) by subsystem adapter 314 and/or other components of building subsystem integration layer 318 such as semantic mediator 316. The event manager 330 can utilize an event logic DB to lookup control triggers, control trigger scripts, or control trigger sequences based on received unified events. Event manager 330 can provide control triggers to integrated control engine 308 as described above with respect to demand response layer 112. As events are received they may be archived in event history 332 by event manager 330. Similarly, demand response layer 112 can store DR events in DR history 335. One or both of event manager 330 and demand response layer 112 may be configured to wait until multi-event conditions are met (e.g., by processing data in history as new events are received). For example, demand response layer 112 may include logic that does not act to reduce energy loads until a series of two sequential energy price increases are received. In an exemplary embodiment event manager 330 may be configured to receive time events (e.g., from a calendaring system). Different time events can be associated with different triggers in event logic database 333.
In an exemplary embodiment the configuration tools 162 can be used to build event conditions or trigger conditions in event logic 333 or control strategy database 310. For example, the configuration tools 162 can provide the user with the ability to combine data (e.g., from subsystems, from event histories) using a variety of conditional logic. In varying exemplary embodiments the conditional logic can range from simple logical operators between conditions (e.g., AND, OR, XOR, etc.) to pseudo-code constructs or complex programming language functions (allowing for more complex interactions, conditional statements, loops, etc.). The configuration tools 162 can present user interfaces for building such conditional logic. The user interfaces may allow users to define policies and responses graphically. In some embodiments the user interfaces may allow a user to select a pre-stored or pre-constructed policy and adapt it or enable it for use with their system.
Referring still to
Fault Detection and Diagnostics Layer
Referring now to
As shown in
Once a fault is detected by the FDD layer 114 (e.g., by statistical fault detection module 412), the FDD layer 114 may be configured to generate one or more alarms or events to prompt manual fault diagnostics or to initiate an automatic fault diagnostics activity via automated diagnostics module 414. Automatic fault diagnostics module 414 may be configured to use meter data 402, weather data 404, model data 406 (e.g., performance models based on historical building equipment performance), building subsystem data 408, performance indices 410, or other data available at the building subsystem integration layer to complete its fault diagnostics activities.
In an exemplary embodiment, when a fault is detected, the automated diagnostics module 414 is configured to investigate the fault by initiating expanded data logging and error detection/diagnostics activities relative to the inputs, outputs, and systems related to the fault. For example, the automated diagnostics module 414 may be configured to poll sensors associated with an air handling unit (AHU) (e.g., temperature sensors for the space served by the AHU, air flow sensors, position sensors, etc.) on a frequent or more synchronized basis to better diagnose the source of a detected AHU fault.
Automated fault diagnostics module 414 may further be configured to compute residuals (differences between measured and expected values) for analysis to determine the fault source. For example, automated fault diagnostics module 414 may be configured to implement processing circuits or methods described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/487,594, filed Jun. 18, 2009, titled “Systems and Methods for Fault Detection of Air Handling Units,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. Automated fault diagnostics module 414 can use a finite state machine and input from system sensors (e.g., temperature sensors, air mass sensors, etc.) to diagnose faults. State transition frequency (e.g., between a heating state, a free cooling state, and a mechanical cooling state) may also be used by the statistical fault detection module 412 and/or the automated diagnostics module 414 to identify and diagnose unstable control issues. The FDD layer 114 may also or alternatively be configured for rule-based predictive detection and diagnostics (e.g., to determine rule thresholds, to provide for continuous monitoring and diagnostics of building equipment).
In addition to or as an alternative to an automated diagnostics process provided by automated diagnostics module 414, FDD layer 114 can drive a user through a manual diagnostic process using manual diagnostics module 416. One or both of automated diagnostics module 414 and manual diagnostics module 416 can store data regarding the fault and the diagnosis thereof for further assessment by manual and/or automated fault assessment engine 418. Any manually driven process of assessment engine 418 can utilize graphical or textual user interfaces displayed to a user to receive feedback or input from a user. In some embodiments assessment engine 418 will provide a number of possible reasons for a fault to the user via a GUI. The user may select one of the faults for manual investigation or calculation. Similarly, an automated process of assessment engine 418 may be configured to select the most probable cause for a fault based on diagnostics provided by modules 414 or 416. Once a cause is detected or estimated using assessment engine 418, a work order can be generated by work order generation and dispatch service 420. Work order generation and dispatch service can transmit the work order to a service management system and/or a work dispatch service 420 for action.
Further, data and processing results from modules 412, 414, 416, 418 or other data stored or modules of a fault detection and diagnostics layer can be provided to the enterprise integration layer shown in
In an exemplary embodiment the automated diagnostics module 414 automatically prioritizes detected faults. The prioritization may be conducted based on customer-defined criteria. The prioritization may be used by the manual or automated fault assessment module 418 to determine which faults to communicate to a human user via a dashboard or other GUI. Further, the prioritization can be used by the work order dispatch service to determine which faults are worthy of immediate investigation or which faults should be investigated during regular servicing rather than a special work request. The FDD layer 114 may be configured to determine the prioritization based on the expected financial impact of the fault. The fault assessment module 418 may retrieve fault information and compare the fault information to historical information. Using the comparison, the fault assessment module 418 may determine an increased energy consumption and use pricing information from the smart grid to calculate the cost over time (e.g., cost per day). Each fault in the system may be ranked according to cost or lost energy. The fault assessment module 418 may be configured to generate a report for supporting operational decisions and capital requests. The report may include the cost of allowing faults to persist, energy wasted due to the fault, potential cost to fix the fault (e.g., based on a service schedule), or other overall metrics such as overall subsystem or building reliability (e.g., compared to a benchmark). The fault assessment module 418 may further be configured to conduct equipment hierarchy-based suppression of faults (e.g., suppressed relative to a user interface, suppressed relative to further diagnostics, etc.). For such suppression, module 418 may use the hierarchical information available at, e.g., integrated control layer 116 or building subsystem integration layer 318 shown in
FDD layer 114 may also receive inputs from lower level FDD processes. For example, FDD layer 114 may receive inputs from building subsystem supervisory controllers or field controllers having FDD features. In an exemplary embodiment FDD layer 114 may receive “FDD events,” process the received FDD events, query the building subsystems for further information, or otherwise use the FDD events in an overall FDD scheme (e.g., prioritization and reporting). U.S. Pat. No. 6,223,544 (titled “INTEGRATED CONTROL AND FAULT DETECTION OF HVAC EQUIPMENT,” issued May 1, 2001)(incorporated herein by reference) and U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0083583 (titled “FAULT DETECTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELF-OPTIMIZING HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTROLS”, filed Nov. 25, 2008, published Mar. 26, 2009)(incorporated herein by reference) may be referred to as examples of FDD systems and methods that may be implemented by FDD layer 114 (and/or lower level FDD processes for providing information to FDD layer 114).
Demand Response Layer
In some exemplary embodiments the DR layer 112 may include a control module configured to actively initiate control actions (e.g., automatically changing setpoints) which minimize energy costs based on one or more inputs representative of or based on demand (e.g., price, a curtailment signal, a demand level, etc.). The DR layer 112 may further include or draw upon one or more DR policy definitions (e.g., databases, XML files, etc.). The policy definitions may be edited or adjusted by a user (e.g., via a graphical user interface) so that the control actions initiated in response to demand inputs may be tailored for the user's application, desired comfort level, particular building equipment, or based on other concerns. For example, the DR policy definitions can specify which equipment may be turned on or off in response to particular demand inputs, how long a system or piece of equipment should be turned off, what setpoints can be changed, what the allowable set point adjustment range is, how long to hold a “high demand” setpoint before returning to a normally scheduled setpoint, how close to approach capacity limits, which equipment modes to utilize, the energy transfer rates (e.g., the maximum rate, an alarm rate, other rate boundary information, etc.) into and out of energy storage devices (e.g., thermal storage tanks, battery banks, etc.), and when to dispatch on-site generation of energy (e.g., via fuel cells, a motor generator set, etc.). One or more of the policies and control activities may be located within control strategy database 310 or business rules database 314. Further, as described above with reference to
A plurality of market-based DR inputs and reliability based DR inputs may be configured (e.g., via the DR policy definitions or other system configuration mechanisms) for use by the DR layer 112. The smart building manager 106 may be configured (e.g., self-configured, manually configured, configured via DR policy definitions, etc.) to select, deselect or differently weigh varying inputs in the DR layer's calculation or execution of control strategies based on the inputs. DR layer 112 may automatically (and/or via the user configuration) calculate outputs or control strategies based on a balance of minimizing energy cost and maximizing comfort. Such balance may be adjusted (e.g., graphically, via rule sliders, etc.) by users of the smart building manager via a configuration utility or administration GUI.
The DR layer 112 may be configured to receive inputs from other layers (e.g., the building subsystem integration layer, the integrated control layer, etc.). The inputs received from other layers may include environmental or sensor inputs such as temperature, carbon dioxide levels, relative humidity levels, air quality sensor outputs, occupancy sensor outputs, room schedules, and the like. The inputs may also include inputs such as electrical use (e.g., expressed in kWh), thermal load measurements, pricing information, projected pricing, smoothed pricing, curtailment signals from utilities, and the like from inside the system, from the smart grid 104, or from other remote sources.
Some embodiments of the DR layer 112 may utilize industry standard “open” protocols or emerging National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards to receive real-time pricing (RTP) or curtailment signals from utilities or power retailers. In other embodiments, proprietary protocols or other standards may be utilized. As mentioned above, in some exemplary embodiments, the DR layer 112 is configured to use the OpenADR protocol to receive curtailment signals or RTP data from utilities, other independent system operators (ISOs), or other smart grid sources. The DR layer 112, or another layer (e.g., the enterprise integration layer) that serves the DR layer 112 may be configured to use one or more security schemes or standards such as the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) Web Service Security Standards to provide for secure communications to/from the DR layer 112 and the smart grid 104 (e.g., a utility company's data communications network). If the utility does not use a standard protocol (e.g., the OpenADR protocol), the DR layer 112, the enterprise integration layer 108, or the building subsystem integration layer 118 may be configured to translate the utility's protocol into a format for use by the utility. The DR layer 112 may be configured to bi-directionally communicate with the smart grid 104 or energy providers and purchasers 102 (e.g., a utility, an energy retailer, a group of utilities, an energy broker, etc.) to exchange price information, demand information, curtailable load calculations (e.g., the amount of load calculated by the DR layer to be able to be shed without exceeding parameters defined by the system or user), load profile forecasts, and the like. DR layer 112 or an enterprise application 120, 124 in communication with the DR layer 112 may be configured to continuously monitor pricing data provided by utilities/ISOs across the nation, to parse the useful information from the monitored data, and to display the useful information to a user to or send the information to other systems or layers (e.g., integrated control layer 116).
The DR layer 112 may be configured to include one or more adjustable control algorithms in addition to or as an alternative from allowing the user creation of DR profiles. For example, one or more control algorithms may be automatically adjusted by the DR layer 112 using dynamic programming or model predictive control modules. In one embodiment business rules engine 312 is configured to respond to a DR event by adjusting a control algorithm or selecting a different control algorithm to use (e.g., for a lighting system, for an HVAC system, for a combination of multiple building subsystems, etc.).
The smart building manager 106 (e.g., using the demand response layer 112) can be configured to automatically (or with the help of a user) manage energy spend. The smart building manager 106 (with input from the user or operating using pre-configured business rules shown in
The smart building manager 106 may also be configured to monitor and control energy storage systems 126 (e.g., thermal, electrical, etc.) and distributed generation systems 122 (e.g., a solar array for the building, etc.). The smart building manager 106 or DR layer 112 may also be configured to model utility rates to make decisions for the system. All of the aforementioned processing activities or inputs may be used by the smart building manager 106 (and more particularly, a demand response layer 112 thereof) to limit, cap, profit-from, or otherwise manage the building or campus's energy spend. For example, using time-of-use pricing information for an upcoming hour that indicates an unusually high price per kilowatt hour, the system may use its control of a plurality of building systems to limit cost without too drastically impacting occupant comfort. To make such a decision and to conduct such activity, the smart building manager 106 may use data such as a relatively high load forecast for a building and information that energy storage levels or distributed energy levels are low. The smart building manager 106 may accordingly adjust or select a control strategy to reduce ventilation levels provided to unoccupied areas, reduce server load, raise a cooling setpoint throughout the building, reserve stored power for use during the expensive period of time, dim lights in occupied areas, turn off lights in unoccupied areas, and the like.
The smart building manager 106 may provide yet other services to improve building or grid performance. For example, the smart building manager 106 may provide for expanded user-driven load control (allowing a building manager to shed loads at a high level of system/device granularity). The smart building manager 106 may also monitor and control power switching equipment to route power to/from the most efficient sources or destinations. The smart building manager 106 may communicate to the power switching equipment within the building or campus to conduct “smart” voltage regulation. For example, in the event of a brownout, the smart building manager 106 may prioritize branches of a building's internal power grid—tightly regulating and ensuring voltage to high priority equipment (e.g., communications equipment, data center equipment, cooling equipment for a clean room or chemical factory, etc.) while allowing voltage to lower priority equipment to dip or be cut off by the smart grid (e.g., the power provider). The smart building manager 106 or the DR layer 112 may plan these activities or proactively begin load shedding based on grid services capacity forecasting conducted by a source on the smart grid or by a local algorithm (e.g., an algorithm of the demand response layer). The smart building manager 106 or the DR layer 112 may further include control logic for purchasing energy, selling energy, or otherwise participating in a real-time or near real-time energy market or auction. For example, if energy is predicted to be expensive during a time when the DR layer 112 determines it can shed extra load or perhaps even enter a net-positive energy state using energy generated by solar arrays, or other energy sources of the building or campus, the DR layer 112 may offer units of energy during that period for sale back to the smart grid (e.g., directly to the utility, to another purchaser, in exchange for carbon credits, etc.).
In some exemplary embodiments, the DR layer 112 may also be configured to support a “Grid Aware” plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV)/electric vehicle charging system instead of (or in addition to) having the charging system in the vehicles be grid-aware. For example, in buildings that have vehicle charging stations (e.g., terminals in a parking lot for charging an electric or hybrid vehicle), the DR layer 112 can decide when to charge the vehicles (e.g., when to enable the charging stations, when to switch a relay providing power to the charging stations, etc.) based upon time, real time pricing (RTP) information from the smart grid, or other pricing, demand, or curtailment information from the smart grid. In other embodiments, each vehicle owner could set a policy that is communicated to the charging station and back to the DR layer 112 via wired or wireless communications that the DR layer 112 could be instructed to follow. The policy information could be provided to the DR layer 112 via an enterprise application 124, a vehicle information system, or a personal portal (e.g., a web site vehicle owner's are able to access to input, for example, at what price they would like to enable charging). The DR layer 112 could then activate the PHEV charging station based upon that policy unless a curtailment event is expected (or occurs) or unless the DR layer 112 otherwise determines that charging should not occur (e.g., decides that electrical storage should be conducted instead to help with upcoming anticipated peak demand). When such a decision is made, the DR layer 112 may pre-charge the vehicle or suspend charge to the vehicle (e.g., via a data command to the charging station). Vehicle charging may be restricted or turned off by the smart building manager during periods of high energy use or expensive energy. Further, during such periods, the smart building manager 106 or the DR layer 112 may be configured to cause energy to be drawn from plugged-in connected vehicles to supplement or to provide back-up power to grid energy.
Using the real time (or near real-time) detailed information regarding energy use in the building, the smart building manager 106 may maintain a greenhouse gas inventory, forecast renewable energy use, surpluses, deficits, and generation, and facilitate emission allocation, emission trading, and the like. Due to the detailed and real-time or near real-time nature of such calculations, the smart building manager 106 may include or be coupled to a micro-transaction emission trading platform.
The DR layer 112 may further be configured to facilitate the storage of on-site electrical or thermal storage and to controllably shift electrical loads from peak to off peak times using the stored electrical or thermal storage. The DR layer 112 may be configured to significantly shed loads during peak hours if, for example, high price or contracted curtailment signals are received, using the stored electrical or thermal storage and without significantly affecting building operation or comfort. The integrated control layer 116 may be configured to use a building pre-cooling algorithm in the night or morning and rely on calculated thermal storage characteristics for the building in order to reduce peak demand for cooling. Further, the integrated control layer 116 may be configured to use inputs such as utility rates, type of cooling equipment, occupancy schedule, building construction, climate conditions, upcoming weather events, and the like to make control decisions (e.g., the extent to which to pre-cool, etc.).
Automated Measurement & Verification Layer
The AM&V layer 110 may further be configured to verify that control strategies commanded by, for example, the integrated control layer or the DR layer are working properly. Further, the AM&V layer 110 may be configured to verify that a building has fulfilled curtailment contract obligations. The AM&V layer 110 may further be configured as an independent verification source for the energy supply company (utility). One concern of the utility is that a conventional smart meter may be compromised to report less energy (or energy consumed at the wrong time). The AM&V layer 110 can be used to audit smart meter data (or other data used by the utility) by measuring energy consumption directly from the building subsystems or knowledge of building subsystem usage and comparing the measurement or knowledge to the metered consumption data. If there is a discrepancy, the AM&V layer may be configured to report the discrepancy directly to the utility. Because the AM&V layer may be continuously operational and automated (e.g., not based on a monthly or quarterly calculation), the AM&V layer may be configured to provide verification of impact (e.g., of demand signals) on a granular scale (e.g., hourly, daily, weekly, etc.). For example, the AM&V layer may be configured to support the validation of very short curtailment contracts (e.g., drop X kW/h over 20 minutes starting at 2:00 pm) acted upon by the DR layer 112. The DR layer 112 may track meter data to create a subhourly baseline model against which to measure load reductions. The model may be based on average load during a period of hours prior to the curtailment event, during the five prior uncontrolled days, or as specified by other contract requirements from a utility or curtailment service provider (e.g., broker). The calculations made by the AM&V layer 110 may be based on building system energy models and may be driven by a combination of stipulated and measured input parameters to estimate, calculate, apportion, and/or plan for load reductions resulting from the DR control activities.
The AM&V layer 110 may yet further be configured to calculate energy savings and peak demand reductions in accordance with standards, protocols, or best practices for enterprise accounting and reporting on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. An application may access data provided or calculated by the AM&V layer 110 to provide for web-based graphical user interfaces or reports. The data underlying the GUIs or reports may be checked by the AM&V layer 110 according to, for example, the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting Standard and the GHG Protocol for Project Accounting. The AM&V layer 110 preferably consolidates data from all the potential sources of GHG emissions at a building or campus and calculates carbon credits, energy savings in dollars (or any other currency or unit of measure), makes adjustments to the calculations or outputs based on any numbers of standards or methods, and creates detailed accountings or inventories of GHG emissions or emission reductions for each building. Such calculations and outputs may allow the AM&V layer 110 to communicate with electronic trading platforms, contract partners, or other third parties in real time or near real time to facilitate, for example, carbon offset trading and the like.
The AM&V Layer 110 may be further configured to become a “smart electric meter” a or substitute for conventional electric meters. One reason the adoption rate of the “Smart Electric Grid” has conventionally been low is that the entire stock of installed electric meters needs to be replaced so that the meters will support Real Time Pricing (RTP) of energy and other data communications features. The AM&V layer 110 can collect interval-based electric meter data and store the data within the system. The AM&V layer 110 can also communicate with the utility to retrieve or otherwise receive Real Time Pricing (RTP) signals or other pricing information and associate the prices with the meter data. The utility can query this information from the smart building manager (e.g., the AM&V layer 110, the DR layer 112) at the end of a billing period and charge the customer using a RTP tariff or another mechanism. In this manner, the AM&V layer 110 can be used as a “Smart Electric Meter”.
When the AM&V layer 110 is used in conjunction with the DR layer 112, building subsystem integration layer 118, and enterprise integration layer 108, the smart building manager 106 can be configured as an energy service portal (ESP). As an ESP, the smart building manager 106 may communicably or functionally connect the smart grid (e.g., energy supply company, utility, ISO, broker, etc.) network to the metering and energy management devices in a building (e.g., devices built into appliances such as dishwashers or other “smart” appliances). In other words, the smart building manager 106 may be configured to route messages to and from other data-aware (e.g., Real Time Pricing (RTP) aware, curtailment signal aware, pricing aware, etc.) devices and the energy supply company. In this configuration, building subsystems that are not RTP aware will be managed by the DR layer 112 while devices that are RTP aware can get signals directly from the utility. For example, if a vehicle (e.g., PHEV) is programmed to charge only when the price of electricity is below $0.1/kWh, the PHEV can query the utility through the smart building manager and charge independently from the DR layer 112.
In an exemplary embodiment the AM&V layer described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/302,854, filed Feb. 9, 2010 can be used as AM&V layer 110 or a part thereof.
Enterprise Integration Layer
The enterprise integration layer 108 shown in
Building Occupant Interface
As indicated above, the enterprise integration layer 108 shown in
Exemplary graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for the building occupant interface (i.e., tenant energy portal) are shown in
In one exemplary embodiment, tenant energy portal 500 is configured to provide a data sharing mechanism (e.g., a forum, a blog, a “social” networking-type component, etc.). Access to such a mechanism may be obtained by clicking on, for example, “blog” tab 502. Using such a mechanism the tenant can share, comment on, and discuss energy information with other tenants in the building. By allowing tenants to view, manipulate and share their energy data, microeconomic trends may begin to take place—driving down energy usage for the tenants and for the building as a whole. Further, the “social” networking aspect of the data sharing mechanism may encourage participation of and between all tenants in the building. To further encourage such use, the tenant energy management portal may be configured to restrict access to tenant comparisons (or detailed tenant comparisons) unless a tenant is willing to enable sharing of their data. Via a blog or forum feature, tenants can ask questions about their energy usage, bill statements, or energy efficiency measures. The building owner (e.g., a building manager for the owner) may monitor the tenant blogs for common issues or to assist with energy reduction initiatives that the tenant may want to implement. In some embodiments, the tenant energy portal 500 can provide privacy, security, confidentiality, anonymity, or other features for each tenant. Accordingly, each tenant may be provided with security settings.
In an exemplary embodiment access to and supervisory control of the tenant energy portal 500 is controlled by a “building owner” configuration tool. The building owner, using the building owner configuration tool, can define and provide user accounts to his or her tenants. The tenants can then log-in to the system and begin using the tenant energy portal 500. In an exemplary embodiment, after logging into the tenant energy management portal 500, the tenant is shown a personalized main page (
Communication and Security Features
Referring again to
The smart building manager 106 may reside on (e.g., be connected to) an IP Ethernet network utilizing standard network infrastructure protocols and applications (e.g., DNS, DHCP, SNTP, SNMP, Active Directory, etc.) and can also be secured using IT security best practices for those standard network infrastructure protocols and applications. For example, in some embodiments the smart building manager may include or be installed “behind” infrastructure software or hardware such as firewalls or switches. Further, configurations in the smart building manager 106 can be used by the system to adjust the level of security of the smart building manager 106. For example, the smart building manager 106 (or particular components thereof) can be configured to allow its middle layers or other components to communicate only with each other, to communicate with a LAN, WAN, or Internet, to communicate with select devices having a building service, or to restrict communications with any of the above mentioned layers, components, data sources, networks, or devices. The smart building manager 106 may be configured to support a tiered network architecture approach to communications which may provide for some measure of security. Outward facing components are placed in a less secure “tier” of the network to act as a point of entry to/from the smart building manager 106. These outward facing components are minimized (e.g., a web server receives and handles all requests from client applications) which limits the number of ways the system can be accessed and provides an indirect communications route between external devices, applications, and networks and the internal layers or modules of the smart building manager 106. For example, “behind” the outward facing “first tier” may lie a more secure tier of the network that requires for authentication and authorization to occur at the first tier before functions of the more secure tier are accessed. The smart building manager 106 may be configured to include firewalls between such tiers or to define such tiers to protect databases or core components of the system from direct unauthorized access from outside networks.
In addition to including or implementing “infrastructure” type security measures as the type disclosed above, the smart building manager may be configured to include a communications security module configured to provide network message security between the smart building manager and an outside device or application. For example, if SOAP messaging over HTTP is used for communication at the enterprise integration layer, the SOAP messages may be concatenated to include an RC2 encrypted header containing authentication credentials. The authentication credentials may be checked by the receiving device (e.g., the smart building manager, the end application or device, etc.). In some embodiments the encrypted header may also contain information (e.g., bits) configured to identify whether the message was tampered with during transmission, has been spoofed, or is being “replayed” by an attacker. If a message does not conform to an expected format, or if any part of the authentication fails, the smart building manager may be configured to reject the message and any other unauthorized commands to the system. In some embodiments that use HTTP messages between the application and the smart building manager, the smart building manager may be configured to provide SSL for message content security (encryption) and/or Forms authentication for message authentication.
The smart building manager 106 may yet further include an access security module that requires any application to be authenticated with user credentials prior to logging into the system. The access security module may be configured to complete a secure authentication challenge, accomplished via a public or private key exchange (e.g., RSA keys) of a session key (e.g., an RC2 key), after a login with user credentials. The session key is used to encrypt the user credentials for the authentication challenge. After the authentication challenge, the session key is used to encrypt the security header of the messages. Once authenticated, user actions within the system are restricted by action-based authorizations and can be limited. For example, a user may be able to command and control HVAC points, but may not be able to command and control Fire and Security points. Furthermore, actions of a user within the smart building manager are written to memory via an audit trail engine, providing a record of the actions that were taken. The database component of the smart building manager 106 (e.g., for storing device information, DR profiles, configuration data, pricing information, or other data mentioned herein or otherwise) can be accessible via an SQL server that is a part of the building management server or located remotely from the smart building manager 106. For example, the database server component of the smart building manager 106 may be physically separated from other smart building manager components and located in a more secure tier of the network (e.g., behind another firewall). The smart building manager 106 may use SQL authentication for secure access to one or more of the aforementioned databases. Furthermore, in an exemplary embodiment the smart building manager can be configured to support the use of non-default instances of SQL and a non-default TCP port for SQL. The operating system of the smart building manager may be a Windows-based operating system.
Each smart building manager 106 may provide its own security and is not reliant on a central server to provide the security. Further, the same robustness of the smart building manager 106 that provides the ability to incorporate new building subsystem communications standards, modules, drivers and the like also allows it to incorporate new and changing security standards (e.g., for each module, at a higher level, etc.).
Multi-Campus/Multi-Building Energy Management
The smart building manager 106 shown in the Figures may be configured to support multi-campus or multi-building energy management services. Each of a plurality of campuses can include a smart building manager configured to manage the building, IT, and energy resources of each campus. In such an example, the building subsystems shown, e.g, in
While
Configurations of Various Exemplary Embodiments
The construction and arrangement of the systems and methods as shown in the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, orientations, etc.). For example, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
The present disclosure contemplates methods, systems and program products on memory or other machine-readable media for accomplishing various operations. The embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented using existing computer processors, or by a special purpose computer processor for an appropriate system, incorporated for this or another purpose, or by a hardwired system. Embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure include program products or memory comprising machine-readable media for carrying or having machine-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such machine-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. By way of example, such machine-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of machine-executable instructions or data structures and which can be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer or other machine with a processor. Combinations of the above are also included within the scope of machine-readable media. Machine-executable instructions include, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing machines to perform a certain function or group of functions.
Although the figures may show a specific order of method steps, the order of the steps may differ from what is depicted. Also two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence. Such variation will depend on the software and hardware systems chosen and on designer choice. All such variations are within the scope of the disclosure. Likewise, software implementations could be accomplished with standard programming techniques with rule based logic and other logic to accomplish the various connection steps, processing steps, comparison steps and decision steps.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/224,205, filed Jul. 29, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/091,261, filed Nov. 26, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,429,927, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/819,977, filed Jun. 21, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,600,556, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/219,326, filed Jun. 22, 2009, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/234,217, filed Aug. 14, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/302,854, filed Feb. 9, 2010. The entireties of all of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2812141 | Sueda et al. | Nov 1957 | A |
3181791 | Axelrod | May 1965 | A |
3641326 | Harte | Feb 1972 | A |
3998093 | Bertolasi | Dec 1976 | A |
4114807 | Naseck et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4182180 | Mott | Jan 1980 | A |
4199101 | Bramow et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4211089 | Mueller et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4213174 | Morley et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4257238 | Kountz et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4319461 | Shaw | Mar 1982 | A |
4325223 | Cantley | Apr 1982 | A |
4346446 | Erbstein et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4432031 | Premerlani | Feb 1984 | A |
4512161 | Logan et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4557317 | Harmon, Jr. | Dec 1985 | A |
4558595 | Kompelien | Dec 1985 | A |
4607789 | Bowman | Aug 1986 | A |
4611470 | Enstrom | Sep 1986 | A |
4622922 | Miyagaki et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4749122 | Shriver et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4776301 | Dziubakowski | Oct 1988 | A |
4802100 | Aasen et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4855922 | Huddleston et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866635 | Kahn et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876858 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4897798 | Cler | Jan 1990 | A |
4916909 | Mathur et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4942740 | Shaw et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4964126 | Musicus et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5042997 | Rhodes | Aug 1991 | A |
5074137 | Harris et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5090303 | Ahmed | Feb 1992 | A |
5099436 | McCown et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5103391 | Barrett | Apr 1992 | A |
5115967 | Wedekind | May 1992 | A |
5131746 | O'Rourke et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5132920 | Bellows et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5189606 | Burns et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5218525 | Amasaki et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5251814 | Warashina et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5253159 | Bilas et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5274571 | Hesse et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5299312 | Rocco, Jr. | Mar 1994 | A |
5315502 | Koyama et al. | May 1994 | A |
5346129 | Shah et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5351855 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355305 | Seem et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5384697 | Pascucci | Jan 1995 | A |
5414640 | Seem | May 1995 | A |
5426421 | Gray | Jun 1995 | A |
5461877 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467287 | Wenner et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481481 | Frey et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506768 | Seem et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5528516 | Yemini et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5552763 | Kirby | Sep 1996 | A |
5555195 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557546 | Fukai et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566084 | Cmar | Oct 1996 | A |
5566092 | Wang et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568377 | Seem et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572878 | Kapoor | Nov 1996 | A |
5582021 | Masauji | Dec 1996 | A |
5590830 | Kettler et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592147 | Wong | Jan 1997 | A |
5596507 | Jones et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602761 | Spoerre et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5663963 | Goodwin, III | Sep 1997 | A |
5675979 | Shah | Oct 1997 | A |
5682329 | Seem et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5751916 | Kon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769315 | Drees | Jun 1998 | A |
5791408 | Seem | Aug 1998 | A |
5801940 | Russ et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838561 | Owen | Nov 1998 | A |
5867384 | Drees et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884072 | Rasmussen | Mar 1999 | A |
5911127 | Tulpule | Jun 1999 | A |
5918200 | Tsutsui et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924486 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930773 | Crooks et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5960381 | Singers et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963458 | Cascia | Oct 1999 | A |
6005577 | Breitlow | Dec 1999 | A |
6006142 | Seem et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012152 | Douik et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021401 | Oravetz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029092 | Stein | Feb 2000 | A |
6058161 | Anderson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064310 | Busak et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067083 | Glen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104963 | Cebasek et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122603 | Budike, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122605 | Drees et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141595 | Gloudeman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148306 | Seidl et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157943 | Meyer | Dec 2000 | A |
6161764 | Jatnieks | Dec 2000 | A |
6178362 | Woolard et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185483 | Drees | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216956 | Ehlers et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219590 | Bernaden, III et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223544 | Seem | May 2001 | B1 |
6253121 | Cline et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6265843 | West et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269650 | Shaw | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282910 | Helt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296193 | West et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324659 | Pierro | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6366832 | Lomonaco et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6366889 | Zaloom | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369716 | Abbas et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389331 | Jensen et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6408228 | Seem et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415276 | Heger et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415617 | Seem | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456622 | Skaanning et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477439 | Bernaden, III et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6535865 | Skaaning et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556950 | Schwenke et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577962 | Afshari | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594554 | Seem et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622264 | Bliley et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626366 | Kayahara et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631299 | Patel et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633782 | Schleiss et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6651034 | Hedlund et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6676831 | Wolfe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684208 | Kil et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687685 | Sadeghi et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6757668 | Goebel et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6785592 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6816811 | Seem | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834208 | Gonzales et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6853882 | Dudley | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862499 | Cretella et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6862540 | Welch et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865449 | Dudley | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6891536 | Smith | May 2005 | B2 |
6937909 | Seem | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944524 | Shier et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6968295 | Carr | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6973793 | Douglas et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6996508 | Culp et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7031880 | Seem et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7036559 | Stanimirovic | May 2006 | B2 |
7043661 | Valadarsky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7096387 | Durrant et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110919 | Brindac et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113890 | Frerichs et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113988 | Chirashnya et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124637 | Singhal et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7181648 | Bjorsne et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7212887 | Shah et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7216021 | Matsubara et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7218974 | Rumi et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222800 | Wruck | May 2007 | B2 |
7225089 | Culp et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7231281 | Costa | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7246039 | Moorhouse | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251582 | Singh et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257744 | Sabet et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7284372 | Crow | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7356548 | Culp et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7409303 | Yeo et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7434413 | Wruck | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444251 | Nikovski et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451003 | Chester et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451017 | McNally | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7519485 | MacGregor | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7552033 | Culp et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7567844 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567888 | Chang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577550 | Ozonat et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578734 | Ahmed et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7636613 | Borah et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7685830 | Thybo et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7698233 | Edwards et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7705269 | Daniel | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7729789 | Blevins et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7822709 | Godwin | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827813 | Seem | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844366 | Singh | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844370 | Pollack et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7873442 | Tsui | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873485 | Castelli et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7880602 | Kasamatsu | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7881889 | Barclay et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7908126 | Bahel et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918407 | Patch | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7962536 | Culp et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7965178 | Schmuttor et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8027742 | Seem et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8103465 | Brzezowski et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8172154 | Figley et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8180664 | Shan | May 2012 | B2 |
8200344 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200345 | Li et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200449 | Mark | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8200456 | Marik et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8219250 | Dempster et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239168 | House et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8374725 | Ols | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8417392 | Higgins | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8543244 | Keeling et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8682612 | Mousavi et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8826165 | Harrod et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9196009 | Drees et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9429927 | Nesler | Aug 2016 | B2 |
10261485 | Drees et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10739741 | Wenzel et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20010045960 | Keeley | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007388 | Bannai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010563 | Ratteree et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016639 | Smith et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030114 | Kayahara et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038169 | Cline et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045995 | Shimazaki et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055820 | Scannell | May 2002 | A1 |
20020138782 | Durrant et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020152298 | Kikta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178047 | Or et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183988 | Skaanning et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030014160 | Nordquist et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028350 | Seem | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031164 | Nabkel et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030074304 | Okada | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079483 | Komatsu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090371 | Teowee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093186 | Patterson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105556 | Enis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114942 | Varone et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135339 | Gristina et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172087 | Godwin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177705 | Forbis et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030229572 | Raines et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002776 | Bickford | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010733 | S. et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024494 | Bayoumi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040072535 | Schneider et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078094 | Nagatsuka et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040102924 | Jarrell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040102937 | Ibrahim | May 2004 | A1 |
20040143474 | Haeberle et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143510 | Haeberle et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143810 | Ahmed et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153819 | Bjorsne et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158417 | Bonet | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164690 | Degner et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186630 | Shier et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186927 | Eryurek et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225513 | Haeberle et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267385 | Lingemann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267395 | Discenzo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006488 | Stanimirovic | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033458 | Brindac et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050033481 | Budhraja et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040250 | Wruck | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050096797 | Matsubara et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114311 | Cheng et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050159847 | Shah et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160324 | Przytula et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050192680 | Cascia et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050192915 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201312 | Archacki, Jr. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235660 | Pham | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256661 | Salsbury et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278047 | Ahmed | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015195 | Lehman et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058900 | Johanson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058923 | Kruk et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060090467 | Crow | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106739 | Holzbauer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060123022 | Bird | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125422 | Costa | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060144057 | You et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161819 | Nissan-Messing et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167591 | McNally | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171396 | Singh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173256 | Ridder et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184326 | McNally et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186214 | Simon et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206240 | Tsui | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224254 | Rumi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259285 | Bahel et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276938 | Miller | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070006124 | Ahmed et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023533 | Liu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061046 | Mairs et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067062 | Mairs et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070139183 | Kates | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143045 | MacGregor | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070225868 | Terlson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070244573 | McFarland | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282547 | Howell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005617 | Maggiore et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028778 | Millet | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080033674 | Nikovski et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054082 | Evans et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082183 | Judge | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083234 | Krebs et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097651 | Shah et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114499 | Hakim | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147465 | Raines et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171396 | Fung et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172258 | Weger et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179408 | Seem | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183424 | Seem | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080231437 | Singhal et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080275674 | Reghetti et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080277486 | Seem et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281663 | Hakim | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288123 | Krishnan et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300963 | Seetharaman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012654 | Culp et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076790 | Fein et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078401 | Cichanowicz | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083089 | Conchieri et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083583 | Seem et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099889 | Okamoto et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105846 | Hesse et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106178 | Chu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112522 | Rasmussen | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090132096 | Swarztrauber et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138203 | Iossifov et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090177595 | Dunlap | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204267 | Sustaeta et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216393 | Schimert | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216469 | Marik et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090307034 | Duff | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090308941 | Patch | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327890 | Mertz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004882 | Chu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042453 | Scaramellino et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049676 | Devitt et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063645 | Brown | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100070907 | Harrod et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082161 | Patch | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106316 | Curry et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106319 | Grohman et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106321 | Hadzidedic | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106328 | Li et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106331 | Li et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114385 | Dempster et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100207951 | Plaisted et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211222 | Ghosn | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241549 | Papavasiliou | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257108 | Skeels et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274366 | Fata et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280774 | Ewing et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100283606 | Tsypin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100286937 | Hedley et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324741 | House et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324962 | Nesler et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029422 | Rey | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046970 | Fontenot | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110061015 | Drees et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066299 | Gray et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110119042 | Johnson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110178977 | Drees | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110204720 | Ruiz et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110231320 | Irving | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246381 | Fitch et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110276527 | Pitcher et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285656 | Yaksick et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110320045 | Salsbury et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120072039 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120271576 | Kamel et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130103201 | Huizenga et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130204443 | Steven | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140172400 | Majewski et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20160041541 | Drees et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170241658 | Salsbury et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180252425 | Laughman et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 404 525 | Feb 2005 | GB |
63-231127 | Sep 1988 | JP |
04-062352 | Feb 1992 | JP |
10-047738 | Feb 1998 | JP |
06-079426 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-079426 | Mar 2006 | JP |
535103 | Nov 1976 | SU |
WO-0068744 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-2009012269 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009012282 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ward et al., “Beyond Comfort—Managing the Impact of HVAC Control on the Outside World,” Proceedings of Conference: Air Conditioning and the Low Carbon Cooling Challenge, Cumberland Lodge, Windsor, UK, London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings, http://nceub.org.uk, Jul. 27-29, 2008, 15 pages. |
Andersen, Stochastic Modeling of Energy Systems, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, 2001, 212 pages. |
ASHRAE Guideline 14-2002, Measurement of Energy and Demand Savings, 2002, 170 pages. |
ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2004, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2004, 4 pages. |
ASHRAE Standard, “Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings I-P Edition,” ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004, 4 pages. |
Barnett et al., Outliers in Statistical Data, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1994, 14 pages. |
Brown et al., “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 1975, vol. 37:2, pp. 149-192. |
Cowan, “Review of Recent Commercial Roof Top Unit Field Studies in the Pacific Northwest and California,” New Buildings Institute, Oct. 8, 2004, 18 pages. |
DOE Federal Emergency Management Program, “Actions You Can Take to Reduce Cooling Costs” URL: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/om_cooling.pdf, May 2005, 8 pages. |
Edelson, “Building Automation Security in Office Building,” Computer Fraud & Security, 2004, 3 pages. |
Financial Times Energy, Inc., “Economizers,” Energy Design Resources, URL: http://www.energydesignresources.com/resource/28/, Jan. 2007, 32 pages. |
Galpin et al., “The Use of Recursive Residuals in Checking Model fit in Linear Regression,” The American Statistician, May 1984, 38:2, pp. 94-105. |
Geweke, “Efficient Simulation from the Multivariate Normal and Student-T Distributions Subject to Linear Constraints and the Evaluation of Constraint Probabilities,” Computing Science and Statistics, Seattle, Apr. 22-24, 1991, 14 pages. |
House et al., “An Expert Rule Set for Fault Detection in Air-Handling Units,” ASHRAE Transactions, 2001, 32 pages. |
Iglewicz et al., “Volume 16: How to Detect and Handle Outliers,” The ASQC Basic References in Quality Control: Statistical Techniques, 1993, 15 pages. |
International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol,“Concepts and Options for Determining Energy and Water Savings,” Mar. 2002, 93 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/070091, dated Sep. 30, 2009, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/070118, dated Oct. 19, 2009, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/024079, dated Oct. 24, 2011, 9 pages. |
Jaehn, “The Zone Control Chart”, Quality Progress, Jul. 1991, 6 pages. |
Kastner et al., “Communication Systems for Building Automation and Control,” 2005, 26 pages. |
Katipamula et al., “Methods for Fault Detection, Diagnostics, and Prognostics for Building Systems—A Review, Part I,” American Society of Heating, 2005, 24 pages. |
Kim et al., “Performance Enhancement of Cyclostationarity Detector by Utilizing Multiple Cyclic Frequencies of OFDM Signals,” IEEE DySPAN 2010 Proceedings, 8 pages. |
Leblanc, “Sur l'electrification des Chemins de fer au Moyen de Courants Alternatifs de Frequence Elevee,” Revue Generale de l'Electricite, 1922, 4 pages. |
Leyva et al., “MPPT of Photovoltaic Systems using Extremum-Seeking Control,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Jan. 2006, 42:1, 10 pages. |
Li et al., “Extremum Seeking Control of a Tunable Thermoacoustic Cooler,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Jul. 2005, 13:4, 10 pages. |
Martin et al., “Supervisory Control for Energy Savings and Thermal Comfort in Commercial Building HVAC Systems,” AAAI Technical Report SS-02-03, 2002, 8 pages. |
Mathews et al., “A Tool for Integrated HVAC, Building, Energy, and Control Analysis Part 1: Overview of QUICK Control,” Building and Environment, 1999, 34, pp. 429-449. |
Nelson, “Best Target Value for a Production Process,” Journal of Quality Technology, Apr. 1978, 4 pages. |
Quesenberry, “SPC Methods of Quality Improvement,” John Wiley & Sons, 1997, 49 pages. |
Rosner, “Percentage Points for a Generalized ESD Many-Outlier Procedure,” Technometrics, May 1983, 25:2, 10 pages. |
Salsbury, “A Controller for HVAC Systems with Embedded Fault Detection Capabilities Based on Simulation Models,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Sep. 1999, 8 pages. |
Sanchez-Pena et al., “Iterative Identification and Control Design: Methodology and Applications,” Identification and Control: The Gap Between Theory and Practice, 2007, Chapter 9, 34 pages. |
Sane et al., “Building HVAC Control Systems—Role of Controls and Optimization,” Proceedings of the 2006 American Control Conference, Jun. 14-16, 2006, 6 pages. |
Shakeri et al., “Optimal and Near-Optimal Algorithms for Multiple Fault Diagnosis with Unreliable Tests”, IEEE, 1996, pp. 473-482. |
Sreedharan et al., “Comparison of Chiller Models for Use in Model-Based Fault Detection,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, eScholarship, 2001, 12 pages. |
Teel, “Lyapunov Methods in Nonsmooth Optimization, Part I: Quasi-Newton Algorithms for Lipschitz, Regular Functions,” Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Dec. 2000, 8 pages. |
Teel, “Lyapunov Methods in Nonsmooth Optimization, Part II: Persistenly Exciting Finite Differences,” Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Dec. 2000, 8 pages. |
Titica et al., “Adaptive Extremum Seeking Control of Fed-Batch Bioreactors,” European Journal of Control, 2003, 14 pages. |
Tudoroiu et al., “Fault Detection and Diagnostic of Valve Actuators in HVAC System”, IEEE, 2005, pp. 1281-1286. |
U.S. Department of Energy, International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol, 2002, DOE/GO-102002-1554, 93 pages. |
U.S. Department of Energy, M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects, Apr. 2008, 306 pages. |
Uraikul et al., “Artificial Intelligence for Monitoring and Supervisory Control of Process Systems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2007, vol. 20, pp. 115-131. |
Wang et al., “Parameter Estimation of Internal Thermal Mass of Building Dynamic Models Using Genetic Algorithm,” Energy Conversion and Management, Aug. 14, 2006, vol. 47, Issue 13, pp. 1927-1941. |
Wong et al., “Building Automation in the 21st Century,” IEEE, 1997, 6 pages. |
Xu et al., “A Simplified Dynamic Model for Existing Buildings Using CTF and Thermal Network Models”, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2008, vol. 47, Issue 9, pp. 1249-1262. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210149429 A1 | May 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61302854 | Feb 2010 | US | |
61234217 | Aug 2009 | US | |
61219326 | Jun 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15224205 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 17142502 | US | |
Parent | 14091261 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 15224205 | US | |
Parent | 12819977 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 14091261 | US |