Smart polymer materials with excess reactive molecules

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10000605
  • Patent Number
    10,000,605
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 13, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 19, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A three-dimensional smart polymer matrix is formed by a first epoxy chemical reaction linking a linear polymer chain and a branched polymer chain, wherein the polymer chains are flexible and one or more reactive molecule species remain unreacted, at a predetermined mathematical ratio of reacted to un-reacted molecules and molecule species, and the un-reacted molecular species are available for further chemical reaction, protonation or deprotonation after the first chemical reaction. The resulting smart polymer matrix is hydrophilic and non-soluble to a solvent or electrolyte.
Description

Smart polymers, electro-active polymer (EAP) gels, hydrogels, and drug eluting polymer gels have all long been the subject of extensive development and investigation for some time. The majority of the literature today refers to each of these as if they were each a specific discipline or classification of materials when, if looked at from a molecular engineering approach, there is a common mechanism of action in many of these materials: a physical change or swelling and de-swelling of a 3-dimensional (3D) polymer matrix on which there are reactive and un-reactive molecular units or sites. Each of these structures are based on crosslinked gels that have been covalently linked at specific molecular sites using a variety of polymer initiation (e.g. radical, thermal, photo, redox, anionic, cationic, coordination) and propagation (e.g. step, chain, ring-opening) methods as well as different polymer types (e.g. addition, condensation).


The affinity of the 3D polymer networks for a particular solvent or electrolyte enables the gel to swell or de-swell. The network typically is defined as hydrophilic or hydrophobic, and this is determined by the nature of the molecular units on the polymer chains. The hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature is dictated by the thermodynamic parameters of solvent and electrolyte interaction with the molecular units. The thermodynamic parameters can be dramatically altered by the introduction of charge to the polymer matrix thereby changing the nature of the interaction with solvent or electrolyte. The kinetics of uptake or expulsion of a solvent or electrolyte is influenced by the porosity, density and surface area of the polymer 3D network and by laws of diffusion. In general the more porous a structure is the faster it can uptake or expel solvent, but with polymer gels for use as actuators the more porosity there is the less structurally sound the polymer is under load. Notwithstanding, we found that this limitation can be countered, by increasing the surface area of the polymer in the actuator design.


According to the present invention, polymer gels, not usually thought of as structurally strong, can be quite useful as mechanical actuation devices, so much so that the epoxy polymer gels explored, can be engineered to meet a variety of specific performance requirements. More particularly, we have determined that the chemical kinetics, the end products, physical properties including speed and force generated by swelling and de-swelling of a 3D polymer matrix, can be molecularly engineered by varying the quantity, type and ratio of reactive molecules in the gel. Furthermore, polymer chain length impacts the actuator both by the size of the swelling response and by the number of molecules available on the chain to produce force. Our findings more importantly show that the molecular reactive units combined provide the actual driving forces and these reactive molecules can be left un-reacted in the polymerization process, where the reactive molecules can then be used to effectively increase the speed and force generated by the actuator. As a result the quantity, type and ratio of molecular reactive units can be tailored to produce forces needed for practical applications of the actuators. The ratio and the density of their electrostatic charges, as well as their affinity for the solvent or electrolyte used, play an important role in the gel's actuation performance through protonation or deprotonation. Protonation is the addition of a proton (H+) to an atom, molecule, or ion. Deprotonation is the removal of a proton (H+) from a molecule, forming the conjugate base.


The relative ability of a molecule to give up a proton is measured by its pKa value, some molecules can have multiple pKa values with dissociation and differing pH levels. Electrolyte molecules or ions can be used according to the performance required. Electrolytes can be mixed according to pKa values and this will modify the performance and swelling range of the polymer.


We also have found that surprisingly, the excess reactive units do not need to be part of the polymer chain, and can be simply placed or entangled within the polymer matrix in order to have significant impact on the gels performance characteristics. Previously we reported1, the results of epoxy-amine hydrogel synthesis and the gel characterization. The present disclosure extends our study on the epoxy polymer gels actuator performance under various conditions that are needed for an actuator to be useful in an industrial or consumer product.


Epoxy amine hydrogels were prepared by reacting branched polyethylene amine polymers such as branched Ethyleneimine or Jeffamine T-403, with the di-epoxide Poly (ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDGE) compounds are water soluble and readily polymerize.





Further features and advantages of the present invention will be seen from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic route of gel synthesis of Jeffamine T-403 polyethylene glycol deglycidyl ether and water;



FIG. 2 illustrates hydration and electrolytic route to gel expansion with sodium acetate;



FIG. 3 shows stroke rate comparison, of different electrolytes, using one polymer actuator formulation;



FIG. 4 shows passive swelling of NH/OH 1.0 ratio gels with varying molecular weight PEGDGE;



FIG. 5 shows hydration of actuator gel formulas with an average PEGDGE chain length with varying ratios of reactive molecular NHNOH ratios;



FIG. 6 compares chain linked impact before breakdown of polymers on maximum swelling in ecetic acid;



FIG. 7 is a graph showing passive hydration pressure generation comparison of different chain links with NH/OH;



FIG. 8 is a graph showing speed of stroke comparison of different NH/OH ratios;



FIG. 9 is a graph showing electrically actuated vertical stroke rate of PEGDGE gels with different NH/OH ratios;



FIG. 10 is a graph showing stroke under low comparison of PEGDGE molecular weight 600 for different NH ratio gels;



FIG. 11 is a graph comparing 1.75 NH ratio gels stroke rates under load;



FIG. 12 is a graph comparing electrical activation pressures of different NH ratio gels;



FIG. 13 is a graph showing impact of binders in electrical activity performance at constant amp;



FIG. 14 is a graph comparing a solid disk and Dry Milled Gel; and



FIGS. 15 and 16 are tables comparing Gelation degree and Swelling degree, respectively of the actuators studied.





As used herein the term “smart polymers” are stimuli-responsive polymers that change according to the environment they are in. As applied specifically to the present invention, the smart polymers change in polymer chain length, flexibility and may swell or change shape at varying speeds. Typically, the smart polymers may respond non-linearly, and are reversible.


In one aspect, the claimed invention provides a three-dimensional smart polymer matrix formed by a first epoxy chemical reaction linking a linear polymer chain and a branched polymer chain wherein the polymer chains are flexible and one or more reactive molecule species remain un-reacted, at a predetermined mathematical ratio of reacted to un-reacted molecules and molecule species, and the un-reacted molecular species are available for further chemical reaction after the first chemical reaction, wherein the smart polymer matrix is hydrophilic and non-soluble to a solvent or electrolyte.


A three-dimensional smart polymer matrix formed by a first epoxy chemical reaction linking a linear polymer chain and a branched polymer chain wherein the polymer chains are flexible and one or more reactive molecule species are left un-reacted, at a predetermined mathematical ratio of reacted to un-reacted molecules and molecule species, and the un-reacted molecular species are available for further chemical reaction after the first chemical reaction, wherein the smart polymer matrix is hydrophilic and non-soluble to a solvent or electrolyte.


In yet another aspect of the invention there is provided a three-dimensional smart polymer matrix formed by a first and one or more secondary epoxy chemical reactions wherein the polymer chains are flexible and elastic, and one or more reactive molecule species remain un-reacted, at a predetermined mathematical ratio of reacted to un-reacted molecules and molecule species, and available for further chemical reaction after the secondary chemical reactions, wherein the smart polymer matrix is hydrophilic and non-soluble to a solvent or electrolyte, and at least one of the reacted molecule species of the polymer chains and or linkages exhibit a polar attraction to a solvent or electrolyte, and the ratio of reacted to un-reacted molecular species determines the physical performance of the smart material.


In one embodiment the polymer chains and linkages are flexible and elastic and at least one of the reacted molecule species of the polymer chains and linkage exhibit a polar attraction to a solvent or electrolyte, and the ratio of reacted to un-reacted molecular species determines the physical performance of the smart material.


In another embodiment one or more of the reactive molecule species left un-reacted are available for one or more secondary chemical reactions.


In yet another embodiment one or more of the reactive molecule species left un-reacted and available after the first chemical reaction are available for a secondary reversible chemical reaction with a solvent or electrolyte dispersed within and around the polymer matrix


In still another embodiment the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more molecule species that can bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge of a reactive molecule within or around the polymer matrix.


In one embodiment the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more molecule species that can reversibly bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge polarity of a reactive molecule species.


In another embodiment the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more molecule species that can reversibly bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge strength of a reactive molecule species.


In yet another embodiment, the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more molecule species that can reversibly bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge of a reacted molecule species.


In still yet another embodiment the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more ion species.


In another embodiment, the solvent or electrolyte has more than one pKa value or dissociations.


In another embodiment the chemistry of the solvent and or electrolyte are sensitive to change as a result of an external energy stimuli.


In yet another embodiment the chemistry of the polymer matrix reactive molecule species is sensitive to change as a result of an external energy stimuli.


In still another embodiment the polymer chain lengths of the linear polymer chains are random within a range and determine the maximum swelling size of the polymer matrix.


In another embodiment the polymer chain lengths of the linear polymer chains are random within a range and a mixture of two or more linear polymers, and wherein the linear polymers are hydrophilic or a combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers.


In yet another embodiment the polymer chain of the linear polymer are assembled block polymers of two or more polymers and are random in length within a range.


In still another embodiment the polymer chain lengths of the branched polymer are not random.


In another embodiment the polymer chain lengths of the branched polymer are random within a range.


In yet another embodiment the polymer chain lengths of the branched polymer are assembled block polymers.


In still yet another embodiment the branched polymer component with one or more reactive molecule species comprises dendrimers, hyperbranched polymers or a combination of one or more of these with branched polymers.


In a preferred embodiment one or more of the components of the first epoxy chemical reaction is selected from the group consisting of a polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether, polypropylene glycol diglycidyl ether, a polymer having an ionic functional group selected from the group consisting of carboxylic acid, phosphoric acid, sulfonic acid, primary amine, secondary amine, tertiary amine, and ammonium, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, vinylacetic acid, maleic acid, metakuriro yloxy ethylphosphoric acid, vinylsulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, vinylpyridine, vinylaniline, vinylimidazole, aminoethyl acrylate, methylamino ethyl acrylate, dimethylamino ethyl acrylate, ethylamino ethyl acrylate, ethyl methylamino ethyl acrylate, diethylamino ethyl acrylate, aminoethyl methacrylate, methylamino ethyl methacrylate, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, ethylamino ethyl methacrylate, ethyl methylamino ethyl methacrylate, eiethylamino ethyl methacrylate, aminopropyl acrylate, methylaminopropyl acrylate, dimethylaminopropylacrylate, ethylaminopropyl acrylate, ethyl methylaminopropyl acrylate, diethylamino propylacrylate, aminopropyl methacrylate, methylaminopropyl methacrylate, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylate, ethylaminopropyl methacrylate, ethyl methylaminopropyl methacrylate, polymers, such as diethylamino propyl methacrylate, dimethylaminoethyl acrylamide, dimethylaminopropylacrylamide, and an akuriroyloxy ethyl trimethylammonium salts, polybutene, a silicone, a silsesquioxane oligomers, an amino functional silicone or siloxane, a silanol functional polymer, a hydrosiloxane, a carbinol functional silicone, an anhydride functional silicone, a bicycloheptenyl functional silicone, a carboxylate functional silicone, a polymeric metal alkoxide, a hydroxyl functional silicone, a polysilsequioxane, and a combination thereof with a functional epoxy groups.


In another preferred embodiment one or more of the components of the first chemical reaction is selected from the group consisting of a branched polyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycol, polypropylene oxide, polypropylene glycol, silicon, a polysilsequioxane, a multifunctional siloxane, polybutene or another flexible polymer with a terminal amine, carboxyl, hydroxyl or other functional unit.


In a preferred embodiment the polymer matrix gel of the present invention has a degree of gelation of below 98%, more preferably below 90% and even more preferably between 75 and 85%.


In yet another embodiment one or more non linking polymers or macromolecules with reactive molecule species are entangled, trapped within and around the polymer matrix and not linked to the polymer matrix after polymerization and are available for chemical reaction.


In still another embodiment one or more non linking polymers or macromolecules with reactive molecule species are entangled, trapped within and around the polymer matrix and partially linked at one or more molecular sites to the polymer matrix after polymerization and are available for chemical reaction.


In still yet another one or more non linking polymers or macromolecules with reactive molecule species are entangled, trapped within and around the polymer matrix and partially linked at one or more molecular sites to the polymer matrix after polymerization and are available for chemical reaction.


In another embodiment one or more reactive molecule species available for chemical reaction determine the pressure generation of the polymer material.


In yet another embodiment one or more reactive molecule species available for chemical reaction determine the pressure generation of the polymer actuator and the surface area determines the speed.


In yet another embodiment one or more reactive molecule species available for chemical reaction determine the pH range of one or both of the passive and active swelling generation of the polymer material.


Amine-cured epoxy networks are formed from the amine hydrogen-epoxide reaction which is shown in FIG. 1. I. The —CH3 group closest to the NH2 group in T-Jeffamine will produce a steric interference to slow the reaction rate of the secondary amines as compared to the non-reacted primary amines2,3,4,5. Therefore, the polymer matrix ends up with a ratio dependent (amine/epoxide) combination of primary and secondary amine hydrogens on the final network.


A. Equilibrium Swelling and Electrolytic Actuation Mechanics of Amine Epoxy Gel

It is important to understand the role the electrolyte or a solvent plays in a hydrogel swelling process. Due to the interconnections between the polymer chains, the crosslinked polymers are insoluble but the structure will uptake a solvent or electrolyte and expand the polymer matrix to the extent that it will allow. If the affinity of the electrolyte or solvent for the molecular sites is stronger than the polymer chains or crosslink bonding then the structure can fracture or decompose reducing the force of the actuator material.


The solvent or electrolyte is attracted to the reactive molecular units on or within the polymer matrix and can remain within the polymer structure in what is typically cited as three states: bound, unbound and free. The strength of each of these interactions varies according to the molecule and its interaction with the solvent or electrolyte, so it is possible to have a combination of several variants of the bound unbound and free states occurring in simultaneous dynamic action6. When charge is introduced to the matrix by protons generated by electrolytic breakdown of the solvent at the electrodes, the solvent or electrolyte in and around the polymer gel will be attracted to, or repulsed from, the polymer matrix according to the strength and density of the charge. Since the molecular sites in the matrix have differing strengths, and therefore different protonated states at equilibrium, it is possible to regulate the volume, speed and force of the swelling/deswelling process via proton injection or ion concentration.


For this study of the epoxy amine gel we used only one supporting electrolyte, aqueous sodium acetate, and looked at the impact that electrolyte concentration had on the swelling characteristics with each change in the polymer/molecule matrix. From this we developed a linear model of the amine epoxy gel's mass volume change in relation to the salt concentration. To reach swelling equilibrium upon hydration the polymer-water interaction of the mixing uptake phase generates osmotic pressures Pmix acting expansively. Due to the polymer-polymer interactions the polymer network counteracts this expansion by an elastic force respected by −Pelast. The contribution of molecular electrostatic interaction to balance the osmotic pressure has to be represented as an expansive pressure Pion. The epoxy-amine gels obtain swelling equilibrium at the balance of three pressures7,8 which can be described by Equation I.

P=(Pmix+Pion)−Pelast   Equation I


The epoxy-amine gels comprise weak base groups such as NH and NH2 that can be protonated. The polymer gels also contain hydroxyl (OH) and ether (O) units that form hydrogen bonds easily with water (Equation III—H2O route). As water enters the matrix and creates hydrogen bonds at the 0 and OH and NH sites the H bonded water molecules also contribute to this process by providing another three, possible H bonding sites9,10 each, and each of these H bonded waters can perpetuate three more H bonds with each new water molecule (Formula I). Therefore, the density of the water charged groups within the network strongly increases upon aqueous hydration. Once the gel reaches equilibrium of hydration it can be further expanded by an adequate generation of mobile counter-ions inside the gel (Equation II—NaAc current route), which induces the phase transition due to electrostatic repulsion and the polymer gel is forced to increase its swelling volume.




embedded image


The primary and secondary amine groups and the hydroxyl groups are electron rich and easily form hydrogen bonds with water molecules, this is demonstrated in hydration study results later in the paper. In an aqueous media an equilibrium exists (Equation II) between the free amino groups and their protonated forms.

R—NH2+H2O⇄[R—NH3]+OH   Equation II


When applying a DC current to a hydrated gel, the region near the anode, in an aqueous electrolyte cell, becomes more acidic as oxygen is released and protons are formed in solution, according to Equation III.

2H2O→O2+4H++4e   Equation III

The region near the cathode becomes more basic according to Equation IV.

2H2O+2e→H2+2OH   Equation IV


During the water electrolysis from the applied current, localized pH gradients are generated near both of the electrodes. At low pH, nearby the anode, the protons enter the matrix, making positively charged (—NH3+), this disturbs the electro-neutrality of the polymer gel. To balance the charge, anions enter the polymer gel matrix along with the solvent (FIG. 2—the current route, which shows hydration and electrolytic route to gel expansion with sodium acetate. It is important to note that a different electrolyte such as sodium bicarbonate will produce negative electrostatic force repulsion). This causes increased swelling, added to this a large amount of ionic repulsion occurs at a higher concentration of NH3+ ions, thereby physically forcing the gel matrix to open and swell allowing an increase in water to water bonding. The epoxy-amine polymer gel contraction or expulsion of fluid occurs at higher pH, in the vicinity of the cathode a reversible process takes place where the hydroxyl ions are created, and the gel shrinks. Simply explained the swelling/shrinking of these epoxy-amine gel actuators works by changing the pH concentration of the solution. This is determined by the electrolyte (sodium acetate), current charge, time and polarity of the electrode.


The results of our study indicate that the amine epoxy gels are highly conducive to materials engineering. The performance of the polymer gel actuator can be incrementally adjusted by changing the following formulation parameters; polymer crosslink density, polymer chain length, degree of polymer gelation, ratio of reactive molecular units, and binding materials. Solvents and electrolytes also play a very important role in the polymer actuation as shown in FIG. 3, so much so that for the purpose of this study the electrolyte concentration was fixed at one concentration in aqueous solution so that the impact of each change made to the polymer material showed as a direct change in the performance of the actuator. Electrical actuation experiments where conducted using an aqueous sodium acetate electrolyte at salt concentration of 0.05 m and passive swelling tests were conducted using 3 aqueous solutions, 0.05 m acetic acid, 0.05 m sodium acetate and DI water. All gels were tested by mechanical tensile tests, hydration swelling change of mass and swelling performance via electrical current over time. Rates of actuation strain both free standing and weight loaded, as well as force generation over hydration time and actuation time were recorded. The formulation was then altered to generate a range of reactive NH to OH molecule ratios from an excess of 2.50H/1.0 NH to 2.5NH/1.0 OH according to the following studies and results.


Passive Aqueous, Electrolyte and Acidic Swelling and Diffusion of Amine Epoxy Gel


Passive hydration tests were accomplished using cured cylindrical polymers that were cast in machined molds to provide a uniform sample size of the polymers. Polymer gels were formulated with an equal ratio of NH to OH molecules or an f ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 using Jeffamine and PEGDGE 200, 400, 526, and 600 molecular weights. The gels were allowed to swell for 72 hours. The gel cylinders showed expected results, with one exception, as shown in FIG. 4, demonstrating incremental increases in swelling sizes that corresponded with increases in the chain length of the PEGDGE component. The 200 mw gels at the f 1.0 ratio showed increased swelling over the rest of the higher molecular weight gels. It is not understood why there was this difference with the 200 mw gel.


When a comparison of how the NH/OH ratio affects the passive swelling of actuator gels with Jeffamine and a single PEGDGE chain length was performed, the data supports the correlation of NH/OH ratios impacting swelling results as shown in FIG. 3. Actuator gels were formulated with PEGDGE 526 mw and the ratio changes produced higher overall swelling with increased ratios. The study also importantly shows that the water swelling of the gels increased significantly with an increase in OH units, where the higher NI-I ratio gels showed much less swelling in water and a much higher 4× difference between the water and acid swelling at the higher NH ratio suggesting less water bonding until the acid protonated state of the NH units. This clearly demonstrates the high degree of impact a change in reactive molecular ratios can accomplish in the overall swelling performance of an actuator material.


B. Polymer Crosslink Density

It has been demonstrated in other studies that dendritic components lend certain desirable characteristics to polymeric networks within which they are incorporated. For example, (a) dendrimers can increase the permeability of a dense crosslinked network, and this can be exploited for sensor applications;17,18 (b) the mechanical properties and water content of a hydro gel can easily be tuned by changing the dendrimer concentration;12 (c) PAMAM dendrimers in hydro gels impart increased hydrophilicity9 which may increase proton conductance through the hydro gels; and (d) properties of hydro gels that incorporate PAMAM are largely dependent on the properties of the other component of the hydro gel polymer.9 Literature suggests that hydro gels crosslinked with dendrimers do not show a significant decrease in their ability to swell as a function of increased crosslinking.


We investigated the mechanical performance effects both dendrimers and hyperbranched polymers had when incrementally added into the amine epoxy formulation. In addition, using dendrimers or hyper branched polymers allowed measured increase in concentration of ionizable amine groups to the amine epoxy gels. We theorized this would increase the performance aspects of the amine epoxy gel actuators.


Dendrimers are symmetric, highly branched, synthetic macromolecules as shown in Formula II. Advantages of dendrimers for hydrogel formation include high crosslinking densities at low polymer concentration, systematic control of physical properties through structural variables provided by the dendrimer and low viscosity of precursor solutions for pre-processing. For this portion of the study, we incorporated both PAMAM and DAB dendrimers from generations 0, 2 and 3.




embedded image


We prepared amine-epoxy hydrogels fabricated from GE-PEG500-GE, Jeffamine T-403 and dendrimers DAB-Am-8, DAB-Am-16, PAMAM-8, PAMAM-16, SP-012 and XTJ-582 in separate formulations. The ratio of NH to epoxide previously determined to give optimal performance and stability characteristics to our amine epoxy standard gel formulation without dendrimer is 2.67:1. Hydrogels having this formulation are called the standard gels (gel-1). Amine epoxy gel formulations where the NH to epoxide ratio remains 2.67:1 but the amount of water used is doubled and tripled are the X2 and the X3 gels respectively (gels 2-3). Two generations of DAB and PAMAM dendrimers were investigated in the formulations for the hydrogel actuators. They are generation 2.0 and 3.0 with 8 and 16 amine residues on the periphery respectively. The volume fraction of Jeffamine T-403 was systematically replaced with dendrimer over several increments, whereas the ratio of NH to epoxide was maintained at 2.67:1 (gels 4-1 1). The critical parameter that distinguishes these dendrimers is the number of amino residues on the surface, which is indicated in the designation of these compounds. We have also characterized these gels in terms of equilibrium swelling characteristics and gelation degree. The dendrimer formulations studied during this period probed the increase of dendrimer composition with a decrease in Jeffamine T-403 composition by one third, while NH to epoxide ratio was maintained at 2.67:1 throughout the entire formulation.


As we studied the effect of dendrimer or hyperbranched polymer crosslinking agents on amine epoxy gels performance, we assayed actuation response, increased hydrolytic stability, and longer cyclical lifetimes. In general, higher crosslink density leads to enhanced mechanical properties and significant reduction in network breakdown. The well-defined structure of dendrimers, with the number (density) of the junctions and their chemical composition easily controlled, should lead to more reproducible properties and responsive behavior of the resulting hydrogels, allowing a systematic study of structure-property relationships and subsequent materials optimization.


Our study indicates that introducing the dendrimers in the PEGDGE/Jeffamine formulation also increases mechanical stiffness thereby reducing the gels flexibility as shown in Table 1. The dendrimer structures also play an important role in improving the gels strength at a higher NH2 to epoxide ratio. Shaped gels were formulated and mechanically tested, and the results are reported below in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Mechanical test results showing effects of adding dendrimers,


hyperbranched, elastomers and binders to the base gel formulation.


Gels that remained intact with no break either had elastomers or


binders added over 36 formulations were tested.













Elastic
Fracture
Strain




modulus
Strength
to


SI. No
Gel Sample
(MPa)
(MPa)
Break














1
Base
1.31
0.3286
0.26


2
Base + 10% XTJ elastomer
0.999
no
no





break
break


3
X2
0.664
no
no





break
break


4
SP-012
1.74
0.383
0.219


8
0.1802 DAB-8
8.53
1.905
0.281


13
00901 DAB-16
7.73
1.508
0.261


18
01802 PAMAM-8
6.1
1.834
0.343


19
10% XTJ + 0.0902
2.84
0.6069
0.238



PAMAM-8


23
00901 PAMAM-16
9.059
1.878
0.23


24
10% XTJ +
4.14
1.006
0.253



0.0451PAMAM-16


25
0.361 SP-012
2.89
0.26
0.10


28
1.441 SP-012
11.37
1.71
0.18


29
PolyEDGE + JT-403 +
6.34
no
no



0.476Ethyleneimine-1300 +

break
break



7.16 Carbon + H2O


32
PolyEDGE +
2.84
no break
no break



0.307Ethyleneimine 1300 +



7.16 Carbon + H2O


33
PolyEDGE + JT-403 +
3.40
no break
no break



0.363Ethyleneimine-1300 +



7.16 Carbon + H2O









The addition of dendrimers do impact the gels total size swelling ability as shown data presented in FIG. 4. This made sense when put into the following mechanical metaphor, a cross section of organized dendrimers are similar to the way a bicycle wheel is, where the spokes create stiffness and hold the shape of the circular wheel, just like a wheel the dendrimer imparts strength, but not flexibility. Hyper branched polymers on the other hand are typically non symmetric molecular constructions having a branched structure, generally around a core. Their structure is typically fan shaped and the base units or monomers used to construct the hyper branched polymer can vary and their distribution is non-uniform. The branches of the polymer can be of different natures and lengths therefore imparting flexibility, we also studied integration of several molecular weights of poly ethyleneimine hyperbranched polymers such as SP-012 shown in Formula III.




embedded image


Hyper branched polymer SP-012 is not entirely linear polymer but partly branched polymer (Formula VI), containing primary, secondary and tertiary amine residues. It is a water soluble polymer which by polymerization of Jeffamine with polyethyleneimine produces a hydrogel. The hydrogel formulation wherein 10% of the Jeffamine T-403 weight was replaced by hyper branched dendrimer SP-012 was formulated. The molecular weight of the SP-012 is 1200 and it has an average of 19 NH residues on its periphery. The epoxide/NH ratio for the above formulation is calculated to be 1:3.4. The hydrogels with hyper branched dendrimer SP-012 incorporated demonstrated good swelling properties when compared to the dendrimer containing formulations of the hydrogel using DAB and PAMAM as shown in Table 1. They also showed a fairly good tensile strength in comparison to the standard gels. Table 1 shows the tensile test results of samples of the gels made from the hyper branched and dendrimer formulations in comparison to the standard gel. The following trends were observed when the amount of SP-012 was increased systematically. With the increase in SP-012 content in the gel, the elastic modulus and fracture strength increases and Strain to Break decreases. Incorporation of 10% XTJ-582, a linear telechelic diaminc, in the hyper branched formulations greatly reduces the elastic modulus and increases the elasticity.


C. Polymer Chain Length

The polymer chain length and elasticity sets the stage for the polymers ultimate strength, flexibility and swelling size of the polymer gel, we theorized that adding a longer chain elastomer would improve the higher crosslinked dendrimer-containing gels' degree of swelling and mechanical properties of the hydrogels. This proved to be successful. XTJ-582 is a polyetherdiamine of about the same weight as JT-403 with a lower level of unconverted hydroxyl groups than the standard Jeffamine D-400 polyetheramine. The polyether backbone contributes flexibility to the hydrogel. We systematically replaced 10% of the JT-403 with XTJ-582 in both base gel and dendrimer-containing gels. FIG. 6 shows a comparison of the water swelling properties of the dendrimer hydrogels with incorporation of XTJ-582. With the increase in DAB-8, DAB-16, PAMAM-8, PAMAM-16 and SP-012 dendrimer content in the gel, the elastic modulus and fracture strength increases and Strain to Break decreases. The higher the generation of dendrimer, greater is the increase in the elastic modulus. Our results show that incorporation of 10% XTJ-582 elastomer in the dendrimer formulations greatly reduces the elastic modulus and increases the elasticity as shown in Table 1. XTJ elastomer, added incrementally also impacted the degree of actuation performance in the gel Incorporation of 6% XTJ-582 produces a relatively soft highly elastic gel. Several other elastomers could be considered in future in order to improve the mechanical properties without compromising the elasticity of the polymer matrix. Gel composition additives including the water amount, curing temperature and time all impacted the crosslink density and the gel elasticity.


In the passive swelling test comparing the Jeffamine and PEGDGE gels, the data for the acetic acid the trend shows that the longer the chain length the larger the swelling. The data shows that the reactive molecule ratio has significant impact and needs to be taken into account as the force generated internally can eventually degrade the integrity of the polymer matrix as shown in the maximum swell rates in FIG. 6 many of the gels broke apart after just a few hours limiting the results, the 200, 400 and 600 PEGDGE accounting for the different scales per chain length. The 200, 400 and 600 are from one supplier and the 526 is from another, this probably accounts for the different stability results at maximum swelling the 526 proves to be extremely stable in all hydration states.


D. Polymer Gelation

One methodology of assessing the integrity and quality of the hydrogel is the measurement of the gelation degree (G) and degree of swelling (Q), which was conducted as follows. The mass of the actuator was taken after it had been cured and air-dried to constant mass (m). The actuators were then placed in distilled water and allowed to soak until they reached an equilibrium and constant mass (mh). The swollen actuators were then removed from the water bath and


allowed to air-dry until they reached constant mass (md). Gelation degree (G) and swelling degree (Q) were then measured as follows:

G=md/m*·100%
Q=1+ρgel(mh/md*·ρH2O−1/ρH2O)*·100%   Equation V

where ρgel is the density of the gel after re-drying and ρH2O is the density of water. FIG. 15 shows the gelation degree and FIG. 16 shows degree of swelling in water for several of the actuators studied. Some significant trends are evident. Increasing the amount of water in the formulation (base gel→X2→X3) results in a dramatic increase in Q. Changing the nature of the dendrimer from DAB to PAMAM and also the generation from 2 to 3 results in an increase in G and a decrease in Q, presumably because of higher crosslinking density introduced with increasing generation. Also, for the same generation dendrimer, when the ratio of Jeffamine to dendrimer decreases, we see an increase in G and decrease in Q for the same reason.


The amine epoxy gels formulated with the hyper branched ethyleneimine also show the impact of gelation on the gels overall swelling characteristics. From both the dendrimer and hyperbranched polymer data we can conclude that increasing the crosslink density strengthens the gel significantly. This strengthening impacts the ability of polymer matrix to physically expand, and the higher the gelation coefficient, the less the hydrogel is able to freely expand during hydration, as evident when comparing FIGS. 15 and 16 where the lowest gelation degree shows the highest swelling.


E. Type and Density of Reactive Units

To see the impact of the reactive molecule groups we conducted two avenues of study, since the swelling kinetics on the amine epoxy gels is determined by the molecular charge attraction and the density of those charges, the amine to epoxide ratio was incrementally increased and decreased to show what effect a higher density of primary amines or hydroxyl units would have on the actuation performance, both by stroke performance under a set load of 0.7 psi and then by speed of total force generated. Another aspect we show is the impact chain length has on pressure generated, since there are water attachment O sites on PEGDGE chains there should be a change in pressure this is seen when two different chain lengths are used with an equal NH/OH ratios as shown in FIG. 7.


In order to see the impact of changing the ratio of the hydroxyl units to amine units by increasing the density of hydroxyl units within the gel we used a polyester hyper branched chain with 32 hydroxyl units on the periphery with a ratio of amine to epoxide units of and collected passive as well as electrically activated swelling data on each. First, the impact of the NH/epoxide ratios on passive swelling and electrical actuation, we started the study using PEGDGE 526, at the 2.67 ratios, but found when we tried to incorporate the other molecular weight PEGDGE's i.e. 200, 400, 600 mws the gels would not polymerize at the higher amine ratios. We then incrementally reduced the NH/epoxide ratios to reach the 2.5 NH/OH, 1.75NH/OH, and 1.0/1.0 NH/OH. The trend indicated that the higher OH gels initial hydration was faster but produced less force overall while the higher NH gels initial hydration was slower but produced higher forces overall and were able to test force generation over time, as shown in FIG. 8.


To allow for an apples to apples comparison of the NH and OH ratios, we formulated the five series of gels shown as 2.5 NH/1.0 OH, 1.75 NH/1.0 OH, 1.0 NII/1.0 OH, 1.75 OH/1.0 NH and 2.5 OH/1.0 NH. Positive results of higher and faster electrical actuation under load according to NH/OH ratios where obtained from the Jeffamine and PEGDGE 526 gels having incremental ratio increases of the excess reactive molecules as shown in FIG. 9.


Actuation stroke rates of the PEGDGE 526 gels in FIG. 9 showed that at each of reactive molecule ratio increments the gels performance aligned with the other corresponding molecular ratios. The 1.0 NH/1.0 OH demonstrated lowest stroke while the 2.5 NH/1.0 OH and 2.5 OH/1.0 OH ratios showed the highest.


When incorporating higher NH ratios into the PEGDGE 600 gels, passive swelling produced very large but not structurally sound material and it become more gelatinous, this had a very negative impact on the stroke performance under load and as shown in FIG. 8 when tested the 2.5NH gels did not perform nearly as well as the 1.75NH 600 gels.


The same held true for the PEGDGE 400 gels and both of the PEGDGE 400 and 600 gels performed best under electrical activation in the 1.75NH formulations as shown in FIG. 9.


Pressures generated under electrical activation also show agreement with the same electrical stroke trends with the higher NH ratio gels attaining the higher forces in line with the results in FIG. 9. FIG. 12 shows maximum pressure generated under electrical current to date on the PEGDGE 526 gels with the 2.5 NH/OH gels attaining the highest pressure and the 1.0 NH/OH gels. Thus, it would appear that eventually the electrically activated gels should be able to match the force generated by the passive swelling gels.


F. Binders Role in the Polymer Matrix

The standard amine epoxy gel without a binder is quite fragile upon hydration and the stress of the actuation strains over 200% can cause gel fracture. To eliminate this problem several materials with binding properties were investigated. At first a few types of fiber fillers were tried such as glass and chopped carbon all of which resulted in very poor results of passive swelling. Then we tried high surface area milled carbons which produced very acceptable swelling results as shown in FIG. 13. The binder does not produce a negative force such as an elastomer but it does act as a static force that has to be overcome by the forces of swelling, the increase in binder equals a stronger material that takes more force to actuate. Therefore it is possible to find an optimum balance for activation response and structural integrity for a polymer actuator that is dependent on the crosslink density, elastic forces, density of reactive molecules, ion concentration and current density used to actuate the material and the desired structural configuration of the actuator. The binders static force does not seem to be countered by adding elastomer as shown in FIG. 13 as the percentage of carbon binder was increased we systematically added elastomer this negatively impacted the performance in the higher binders concentrations were in the lower binder concentrations the elastomer did not make as large a difference.


The invention will now be illustrated with reference to the following working examples.


I. Materials


Poly (ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether PEGDGE 200,400 and 600 mw available from Poly Sciences; Poly (ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether PEGDGE 526 the DAB and PAMAM dendrimer, Ethyleneimine, hyperbranched polyester, Nanoclay, Nanomer 1.30E, clay surface modified available from Sigma-Aldrich; JEFFAMINE T403 available from the Huntsman Chemical Company; and Printex conductive carbon black available from Degussa were assembled. Deionized water was used for all experiments. Teflon gel molds for gel casting were made in house.


II. Preparation of the Gels


The hydrogels were prepared by reacting the crosslinking agent JEFFAMINE T-403 with PEGDE. The binders and water were added to the mixture subsequently. These materials were kept at the same percent for all gels. The JEFFAMINE T403 and the POLYEDGE percentage varied depending on the studied ratios between them. The standard gel of NH 2.67 contained JEFFAMINE T-403 and PEGDGE 526. This composition was used for some of the presented data. After the gels are cast they were cured for 5 hours at 60 C and dried for 48 hours at room temperature.


Solid gel discs and dry milled (DMG) high surface area gels were tested for stroke rate and force generation, and the results shown in FIG. 12, which indicate the pressure produced is the same by both only the speed is affected by the change in surface area. All pressure and stroke data was performed with the Dry Milled Gel (DMG).


To formulate the high OH ratio actuator gels hyperbranched polyesters with 32 OH units on the periphery of the polyester chain (Formula VII) were incorporated into the gel formulation. Hyperbranched polyesters are related to dendrimers in their fundamentally branched architecture. However, the branching is not perfectly regular, and the materials have a structural and molecular weight polydispersity more typical of conventional polymers.




embedded image


The hyperbranched polyesters were added to the standard gel formulation as an additive in two amounts to adjust the NH/OH ratios to an excess of 1.75 OH units to NH and an excess of 2.5 OH units to NH. We believe the water soluble polymer becomes entangled within the amine epoxy polymer matrix as the epoxy reaction takes place. To determine this we conducted FT-IR analysis of 5 different formulations, incorporating the hyperbranched dendrimer HP-16 and HP-32, which did not gel when mixed with JT-403 or with Poly EDGE. The FT-IR of all the neat samples were recorded on polyethylene films except the base gel which was recorded (as a reference) with KBr. Table 2 shows the major IR peaks of 5 different formulations including the polymerized gel without the HP-16 or HP-32.









TABLE 2







IR values of HP 16 and HP-32 formulations








Formulation
IR values (in cm−1)



















Polymerized gel
3434,

2878 

1650,
1361,

 1109,
947


JT-403 + HP-16 + H2O
3393,
2920,
2850,

1646,
1380,

1091



JT-403 + HP-32 + H2O
3386,
2921,
2853,

1646,
1380,

1091



Poly EDGE + HP-16 + H2O
3422,
2920,
2854,
1730,
1645,
1354,
1247,
1108



Poly EDGE + HP-32 + H2O
3418,
2920,
2855,
1730,
1647,
1353,
1248,
1106









In the above table, IR values in the range of 3300 to 3500 cm−1 indicates the 0-H stretch of water and N—H stretch of primary amines. 2800-2900 cm−1 indicates the C—H stretch of the aliphatic chain. 1640 cm−1 is the C═O stretch of the hyper branched dendrimer. 1100-1200 cm−1 is the region of C═O stretch of JT-403, XTJ-582 and Poly EDGE. 1109 cm−1 is the C—N stretch of JT-403 and 947 is the N—H wagging frequency. For comparison, Table 2 shows the IR values of the individual components JT-403, Poly EDGE and hyper branched polyesters 16 and 32. The IR values of the above 5 samples show that there is no evidence of any amide bond formation involving the hyper branched polymer. However, we see a peak at 1730 cm−1 which we believe correlates with the polyester chain in the Poly EDGE and HP combination formulations. The remaining peaks are in agreement with the structure of the dendrimer and other reactants.


III. Equilibrium Swelling


Cast cylinders were allowed to hydrate in deionizer water, aqueous sodium acetate 0.05 m amid acetic acid 0.05 m for 72 hours. Gel samples and 150 cc of a solution were used for all measurements. The hydrated samples were removed from the bath, blotted dry, and weight to obtained Wt. The W0 and Wt, were average of 3 samples. Percent change mass of hydrogel samples H, was calculated according to Equation VI:

H=(Wt−W0)/W0   Equation VI

where W0 is the weight of the dried sample.


IV. Electrical Actuation


The gels were cast in 20 ml batch sizes and cast as one disc discs were then dry milled to achieve high surface area. Samples were weighed and allowed to reach equilibrium in electrolyte solution and then loaded into a test apparatus.


V. Force and Stroke Testing


Force and stroke testing was conducted using 1 gram of dry milled gel subjected to hydrating solutions in force sensing fixtures and stroke displacement fixtures, and the results recorded.


The amine epoxy gels elasticity is governed by the cross-linked density and the polymer backbone of the crosslinking di-epoxide. The speed and force of actuation strongly depends on the amine-epoxide group ratio [6, 7]. Typically we found that at NH ratios higher than 2.5, the gels are very sticky and easily break under further hydration. An improvement of the mechanical gel properties was achieved by different fillers like active carbons, clays [7] and other high surface additives. The polymer-polymer affinity is due to chemical interaction between the polymer and the solvent [8]. Finally, the change of pH solution by the electrolysis impacts the hydrogen ion pressure. These three forces contribute to the osmotic pressure, which determines the equilibrium state of the gel and creates the volume change and total osmotic pressure [8-11] as long as it is determined by the reactive molecule species available on the polymer chains and within the polymer matrix.


The incorporation of the dendrimers into the hydrogels was investigated with zero, second and third generation of DAB and PAMAM dendrimers. Initial studies with incorporation of hyperbranched dendrimer SP-012 and elastomer XTJ-582 were also investigated. These gels were characterized in terms of swelling properties, mechanical properties and time dependent pH volume changes. Techniques like FTIR, DSC and TGA were used to characterize some of these hydrogels and additional hyperbranched polymers. We observed some significant trends in the properties of these actuators when the dendrimers and hyperbranched materials are incorporated into the gels and thus motivate us to carry further study on them.


The addition of OH groups gives the actuator gel an initial faster swelling response under electrical activation in the first 5 hrs over other versions of the amine epoxy gels. A similar trend of hydration swelling to activation swelling was shown in the dendrimer formulations of the gels.


We have shown the materials to produce >500% volume/weight gain in 1 hr under electrical activation. Previous to this work we were only able to get 100% volume/weight gain over 24 hours of activation and retain an intact gel actuator. We have successfully demonstrated that incorporation of dendrimers and hyperbranched materials result in pH responsive hydrogels that demonstrate (1) increased stability; (2) increased reproducibility of actuation; and we have demonstrated that the reactive molecule ratio can be manipulated to increased actuation response both in speed and pressure generation due to pronation or deprotonation of the molecules.


REFERENCES



  • [1] Plata, E R; Rogers, 1-1; Banister, M.; Vohnout, S.; McGrath, D. EAP Hydrogels for Pulse-Actuated Cell System (PACS) Architectures, Proceedings-SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2007, 6524, 65241T.1-6524 1T.8.

  • [2] Calvert, P.; Patra, P.; Duggal, D. Epoxy Hydrogels as Sensors and Actuators, Proceedings-SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2007, 6524, 65240M.1-65240M.6.

  • [3] Calvert, P. Elecetroactive Polymer Gel, in Eletroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles-Reality, Potential and Challenges, ed. Y.Bar-Chen, SPIE Press. Vol. PM98, 123-138, 2001.

  • [4] Yoshioka, Y.; Calvert, P. Epoxy-Based Electroactive Polymer Gels, Experimental Mechanics, 2002, 42, 404-408.

  • [5] Samui, A. B.; Jayakumar, S.; Jayalakshmi, C. G.; Pandey, K.; Sivaraman, P. Electroactive polymer gels based on epoxy resin, Smart Material and Structures, 2007, 16, 237-242.

  • [6] Richter, A.; Paschew, G.; Klatt, S.; Lienig, J.; Arndt, K-F.; Adler, H.-J. P. Review on. Hydrogel-based Sensors and Microsensors, Sensors, 2008, 8, 561-581.

  • [7] Omidian H.; Hashemi S.-A.; Askari, F.; Nafisi, S. Swelling and Crosslink Density Measurements for Hydrogels, Iranian Journal of Polymer Science and Technology, 1994, 3, 115-119.

  • [8] Choe, K.; Kim, K.; Doyeon, K.; Manford, C.; Heo, S.; Shahinpoor, M. Performance Characteristics of ElectroChemically Driven Polyacrylonitrile Fiber Bundle Actuators, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2006, 17, 563-576.

  • [9] Richter, A.; Paschew, G.; Klatt, S.; Lienig, J.; Arndt, K-F.; Adler, H.-J. P. Review on Hydrogel-based pH Sensors and Microsensors, Sensors, 2008, 8, 561-581.

  • [10] Schneider, H.-J.; Kato, K.; Strongin, R. Chemomechanical Polymers as Sensors and Actuators for Biological and Medicinal Applications, Sensors, 2007, 7, ˜578-1611.

  • [11] Omidian H.; Hashemi S-A.; Askari, F.; Nafisi, S. Swelling and Crosslink Density Measurements for Hydrogels, Iranian Journal of Polymer Science and Technology, 1994, 3, 115-119.

  • [12] Bajpai, S. K.; Duhey, S. Synthesis and Swelling Kinetics of a pH-Sensitive Terpolymeric Hydrogel System, Iranian Polymer Journal, 2004, 13, 189-203.

  • [13] Sraydin, D.; Karadag, E.; Oztop, H. N.; Guven, O. Adsorption of Bovine Serum Albumin onto Acrylamide-Maleic Acid Hydrogels, Biomaterials, 1994, 15, 917-920.

  • [14] Skaarup, S. Polypyrrole for Artificial Muscles: Ionic Mechanisms, Solid State Jonics: Advanced Materials for Emerging Technologies, 2006, 10, 768-779.

  • [15] Velmurugu, Y; Skaarup, S. Ion and Solvent Transport in Polypyrrole: Experiment Test of Osmotic Model, Ionics, 2005, 11, 370-374.

  • [16] Gabrielli E C.; Keddam, M. Non-Steady State Techniques, Comprehensive Treatise of Electrochemistry, ed. E. Yeagar, J. O'M. Bockris, B. Conway, S. Sarangaparmi, Plenium Press, Vol. 9, 62-172 (1984).

  • [17] Tanaka, T.; Fillmore, D. Kinetics of swelling of gels, J. Chem. Phys., 1979, 70, 1214-1218

  • [18] Xiang, Y.; Peng, 1; Chen, D. A new polymer/clay nano-composite hydrogel with improved response rate and tensile mechanical properties, European Polymer Journal, 2006, 42, 2125-2132.


Claims
  • 1. A three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel comprising linear polymer chain structures, branched polymer chain structures, reactive NH groups, reactive NH2 groups, and reactive OH groups; wherein the three dimensional smart polymer matrix gel is formed by linking an epoxy reactant and an amine polymer reactant; wherein the epoxy reactant is at least one of polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether and polypropylene glycol diglycidyl ether; wherein the amine polymer reactant comprises a branched polyether amine represented by the following chemical structure:
  • 2. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1 wherein the linear polymer chain structure and the branched polymer chain structures are flexible and elastic; wherein at least one of the reactive NH groups, NH2 groups, and OH groups exhibit a polar attraction to a solvent or electrolyte; wherein the ratio of the reactive NH groups and OH groups determines a physical performance of the three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel; and wherein at least one of the reactive NH groups, NH2 groups, and OH groups are capable of participating in further chemical reactions, protonations or deprotonations.
  • 3. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1 wherein at least one of the reactive NH groups, NH2 groups, and OH groups are capable of participating in a reversible chemical reaction, protonation or deprotonation with a solvent or electrolyte dispersed within and around the three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel; wherein the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more molecule species that can (a) bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge of the at least one of the reactive NH groups, NH2 groups, and OH groups, or (b) reversibly bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge polarity of the at least one of the reactive NH groups, NH2 groups, and OH groups.
  • 4. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more molecule species that can reversibly bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge, protonation or deprotonation strength of at least one of the reactive NH groups, NH2 groups, and OH groups.
  • 5. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1 wherein the linear polymer chain structures comprise a mixture of two or more linear polymer chain structures, and wherein the linear polymer chain structures are hydrophilic or a combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers.
  • 6. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the degree of gelation is below 90%.
  • 7. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the degree of gelation is between 75 and 85%.
  • 8. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more molecule species that can reversibly bond with and reversibly change the molecular charge, protonation or deprotonation of at least one of the reactive NH groups, NH2 groups, and OH groups.
  • 9. The three dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the solvent or electrolyte contains one or more ion species.
  • 10. The three dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the solvent or electrolyte has more than one pKa value or dissociations.
  • 11. The three dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the chemistry of the solvent or electrolyte is sensitive to change as a result of an external energy stimuli.
  • 12. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1 wherein the branched polymer chain structures have random chain lengths within a range.
  • 13. The three-dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein the branched polymer chain structures additionally include hyperbranched polymers, dendrimer polymers or combination thereof, with one or more reactive end units, wherein the hyperbranched polymer, dendrimer polymer or combination thereof is crosslinked, with or as crosslink component of the three dimensional smart polymer matrix gel.
  • 14. The three dimensional smart polymer matrix gel of claim 1, wherein one or more hyperbranched or dendrimer polymers with one or more reactive end units are entrapped or tangled and not crosslinked within the three dimensional smart polymer matrix gel.
Government Interests

This invention was made with Government support under National Science Foundation under TIP STTR Grant No. 0848528. Therefore, the United States Government may have certain rights in this invention.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US2013/031062 3/13/2013 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2013/138524 9/19/2013 WO A
US Referenced Citations (333)
Number Name Date Kind
3922328 Johnson Nov 1975 A
4034380 Isayama Jul 1977 A
4111202 Theeuwes Sep 1978 A
4190411 Fujimoto Feb 1980 A
4203440 Theeuwes May 1980 A
4299220 Dorman Nov 1981 A
4327725 Cortese et al. May 1982 A
4395719 Majewski et al. Jul 1983 A
4423166 Moriarty et al. Dec 1983 A
4432699 Beckman et al. Feb 1984 A
4449893 Beckman May 1984 A
4449983 Cortese et al. May 1984 A
4507363 Chow et al. Mar 1985 A
4524762 Schulman Jun 1985 A
4538607 Saul Sep 1985 A
4551139 Plaas et al. Nov 1985 A
4559038 Berg et al. Dec 1985 A
4595583 Eckenhoff et al. Jun 1986 A
4624847 Ayer et al. Nov 1986 A
4624848 Lee Nov 1986 A
4650469 Berg et al. Mar 1987 A
4655767 Woodward et al. Apr 1987 A
4663149 Eckenhoff et al. May 1987 A
4675174 Eckenhoff Jun 1987 A
4723958 Pope et al. Feb 1988 A
4772474 Eckenhoff et al. Sep 1988 A
4781714 Eckenhoff et al. Nov 1988 A
4808084 Tsubouchi et al. Feb 1989 A
4810535 McCollum et al. Mar 1989 A
4842493 Nilsson Jun 1989 A
4863456 Stephens et al. Sep 1989 A
4948592 Ayer et al. Aug 1990 A
4963141 Eckenhoff Oct 1990 A
4986260 Iams Jan 1991 A
5000957 Eckenhoff et al. Mar 1991 A
5029939 Smith Jul 1991 A
5034229 Magruder et al. Jul 1991 A
5037420 Magruder et al. Aug 1991 A
5059423 Magruder et al. Oct 1991 A
5061242 Sampson Oct 1991 A
5070560 Wilkinson Dec 1991 A
5100933 Tanaka et al. Mar 1992 A
5105983 Sancoff et al. Apr 1992 A
5110596 Magruder et al. May 1992 A
5175246 Smith Dec 1992 A
3029743 Johns Mar 1993 A
5192197 Culp Mar 1993 A
5192298 Smith et al. Mar 1993 A
5192304 Rassman Mar 1993 A
5232702 Pfister et al. Aug 1993 A
5246705 Venkatraman et al. Sep 1993 A
5267365 Walter Dec 1993 A
5275853 Silvis Jan 1994 A
5279544 Gross et al. Jan 1994 A
5279565 Klein et al. Jan 1994 A
5284133 Burns et al. Feb 1994 A
5300299 Sweet et al. Apr 1994 A
5304121 Sahatjian Apr 1994 A
5327041 Culp Jul 1994 A
5328696 Noel Jul 1994 A
5336057 Fukuda et al. Aug 1994 A
5348746 Dong et al. Sep 1994 A
5354264 Bae et al. Oct 1994 A
5376378 Li et al. Dec 1994 A
5380760 Wendel et al. Jan 1995 A
5412821 Wilkinson May 1995 A
5429585 Liang Jul 1995 A
5431921 Thombre Jul 1995 A
5474783 Miranda et al. Dec 1995 A
5520643 Ensminger et al. May 1996 A
5498255 Wong Aug 1996 A
5546932 Galli Aug 1996 A
5564142 Liu Oct 1996 A
5573668 Grosh et al. Nov 1996 A
5587237 Korpman et al. Dec 1996 A
RE35474 Woodard et al. Mar 1997 E
5618899 Appelt et al. Apr 1997 A
5622482 Lee Apr 1997 A
5630709 Bar-Cohen May 1997 A
5633009 Kenealy et al. May 1997 A
5645855 Lorenz Jul 1997 A
5656286 Miranda et al. Aug 1997 A
5674192 Sahatjian et al. Oct 1997 A
5687748 Conrad et al. Nov 1997 A
5692256 Kramer et al. Dec 1997 A
5714160 Magruder et al. Feb 1998 A
5718700 Edgren et al. Feb 1998 A
5779668 Grabenkort Jul 1998 A
5798600 Sager et al. Aug 1998 A
5810001 Genga et al. Sep 1998 A
5823178 Lloyd et al. Oct 1998 A
5836900 Leventhal Nov 1998 A
5891463 Bello et al. Apr 1999 A
5916968 Hariharan et al. Jun 1999 A
5939477 Pretzer et al. Aug 1999 A
5951999 Therriault et al. Sep 1999 A
5954706 Sahatjian Sep 1999 A
5955549 Chang Sep 1999 A
5961298 Bar-Cohen Oct 1999 A
5979892 Smith Nov 1999 A
5997501 Gross et al. Dec 1999 A
6004115 Da Costa Dec 1999 A
6010485 Buch-Rasmussen et al. Jan 2000 A
6024976 Miranda et al. Feb 2000 A
6066325 Wallace et al. May 2000 A
RE36754 Noel Jun 2000 E
6074178 Bishop et al. Jun 2000 A
6074179 Jokela Jun 2000 A
6106245 Cabuz Aug 2000 A
6109852 Shahinpoor et al. Aug 2000 A
6143138 Becker Nov 2000 A
6152898 Olsen Nov 2000 A
6157113 Hunter et al. Dec 2000 A
6165155 Jacobsen et al. Dec 2000 A
6174546 Therriault et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180133 Quan et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183434 Eppstein Feb 2001 B1
6184608 Cabuz Feb 2001 B1
6193996 Effing et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206850 O'Neil Mar 2001 B1
6210712 Edgren et al. Apr 2001 B1
6213739 Phallen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6221383 Miranda et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223369 Maier et al. May 2001 B1
6249076 Madden et al. Jun 2001 B1
6277401 Bello et al. Aug 2001 B1
6312715 Cantor et al. Nov 2001 B1
6316022 Mantelle et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319245 Berrigan Nov 2001 B1
6336907 Dono et al. Jan 2002 B1
6337086 Kanios et al. Jan 2002 B1
6352715 Hwang et al. Mar 2002 B1
6365178 Venkateshwaran et al. Apr 2002 B1
6365185 Ritschel et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368318 Visuri et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378292 Youngner Apr 2002 B1
6387077 Klibanov et al. May 2002 B1
6392777 Elliott et al. May 2002 B1
6409716 Sahatjian et al. Jun 2002 B1
6450773 Upton Sep 2002 B1
6461644 Jackson et al. Oct 2002 B1
6464476 Ross et al. Oct 2002 B2
6471686 Berrigan Oct 2002 B1
6475639 Shahinpoor et al. Nov 2002 B2
6490483 Willis Dec 2002 B2
6531152 Lerner et al. Mar 2003 B1
6537194 Winkler Mar 2003 B1
6578245 Chatterjee et al. Jun 2003 B1
6586512 Dukes Jul 2003 B1
6632522 Hyde et al. Oct 2003 B1
6664718 Pelrine et al. Dec 2003 B2
6682318 Takeuchi Jan 2004 B2
6682500 Soltanpour et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685442 Chinn et al. Feb 2004 B2
6726678 Nelson Apr 2004 B1
6766817 Da Silva Jul 2004 B2
6791003 Choi et al. Sep 2004 B1
6796970 Klitmose et al. Sep 2004 B1
6809462 Pelrine et al. Oct 2004 B2
6829797 Partian Dec 2004 B2
6864295 Mitarai Mar 2005 B2
6869275 Dante et al. Mar 2005 B2
6876135 Pelrine et al. Apr 2005 B2
6902704 Wilson Jun 2005 B2
6940211 Pelrine et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948636 Fischer et al. Sep 2005 B1
6949079 Westberg et al. Sep 2005 B1
6955923 Hutting Oct 2005 B2
6960864 Urano et al. Nov 2005 B2
7285255 Kadlec et al. Oct 2007 B2
7411792 Richards et al. Aug 2008 B2
7453187 Richards et al. Nov 2008 B2
7458956 Adams Dec 2008 B1
7544260 Banister et al. Jun 2009 B2
7553903 Riegel et al. Jun 2009 B2
7572239 Brotz Aug 2009 B1
7700129 Ito et al. Apr 2010 B2
7771176 Weber Aug 2010 B2
7820427 Unger et al. Oct 2010 B2
8190270 Wingeier et al. May 2012 B2
8695640 Unger et al. Apr 2014 B2
20010053383 Miranda et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020001571 Wu Jan 2002 A1
20020004064 Quan et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007014 Hyde et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010412 Eppstein Jan 2002 A1
20020015733 Flashner-Barak et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020027384 Zur Mar 2002 A1
20020043895 Richards et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020073489 Totton et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020106402 Hartwig Aug 2002 A1
20020115740 Beuhler et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020128572 Chang Sep 2002 A1
20020128618 Frenz et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147208 Fleshner-Barak et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156463 Berrigan Oct 2002 A1
20020173745 Santini et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020183738 Chee et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020193754 Cho Dec 2002 A1
20030014036 Varner et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030051292 Ferrand et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030054025 Cantor et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065303 Wellman et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069359 Torii et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072792 Flanigan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030108590 Peery et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030124189 Zentner et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135158 Gonnelli Jul 2003 A1
20030139495 Zentner et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030143257 Fleshner-Barak et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152616 Hartwig Aug 2003 A1
20030153900 Aceti et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156953 Chinn et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030163099 Wermeling et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030216683 Shekalim Nov 2003 A1
20030232198 Lamberti et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040030262 Fisher et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040068224 Couvillon et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040092865 Flaherty et al. May 2004 A1
20040102762 Gilbert May 2004 A1
20040106893 Hunter Jun 2004 A1
20040106894 Hunter et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040112442 Maerkl et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133159 Haider et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138603 Cleary et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040142023 Hartwig Jul 2004 A1
20040149288 Koch Aug 2004 A1
20040176502 Raymond et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040176748 Abramson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186419 Cho Sep 2004 A1
20040202708 Roehrig et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204677 Wellman et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040219194 Finckh et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040220548 Heruth et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040234401 Banister Nov 2004 A1
20040242709 Oguro et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040265545 McKean et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050009976 Akkapeddi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050033230 Alchas et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050043657 Couvillon Feb 2005 A1
20050058695 Anigbogu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050137577 Heruth et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137578 Heruth et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050137579 Heruth et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050261631 Clarke et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273081 Olsen Dec 2005 A1
20050273082 Olsen Dec 2005 A1
20050287214 Ayer et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060021614 Wermeling et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060076540 Zama et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060078603 Nguyen Apr 2006 A1
20060078604 Kanios et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060084942 Kim et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060089619 Ginggen Apr 2006 A1
20060094985 Aceti et al. May 2006 A1
20060094989 Scott et al. May 2006 A1
20060110596 Palasz et al. May 2006 A1
20060135911 Mittur Jun 2006 A1
20060142478 Luo Jun 2006 A1
20060142875 Keyes et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060146475 Zhong et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060183216 Handique et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060188558 Jackson et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195057 Kriesel et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200083 Freyman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060204532 John Sep 2006 A1
20060213674 Dierker, Jr. et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060276744 Falk Dec 2006 A1
20070021697 Ginther et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070031495 Eppstein et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070033738 Tu Feb 2007 A1
20070052139 Gilbert Mar 2007 A1
20070070684 Poulos Mar 2007 A1
20070078376 Smith Apr 2007 A1
20070082038 Gale et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070088267 Shekalim Apr 2007 A1
20070092570 Missel et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070098771 Audett et al. May 2007 A1
20070098772 Westcott et al. May 2007 A1
20070100355 Bonde et al. May 2007 A1
20070104771 Audett et al. May 2007 A1
20070134310 Nedberge et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070148218 Gordon Jun 2007 A1
20070190150 Ito et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070224253 Franklin Sep 2007 A1
20070260201 Prausnitz et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070269522 Wold Nov 2007 A1
20070293826 Wall et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080004421 Chenault Jan 2008 A1
20080009800 Nickel Jan 2008 A1
20080015494 Santini, Jr. et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033228 Rastegar et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039791 Abboud et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058706 Zhang et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080063698 Hartwig Mar 2008 A1
20080091139 Srinivasan et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080110463 Hajgato et al. May 2008 A1
20080125744 Treacy May 2008 A1
20080152592 Rebec Jun 2008 A1
20080167641 Hansen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183144 Trautman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195018 Larson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208107 McRae et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080214987 Xu Sep 2008 A1
20080221552 Leonard Sep 2008 A1
20080234656 Pettis et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080312610 Binks et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080317615 Banister Dec 2008 A1
20090007904 Schuster et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090020521 Blaszczykiewicz et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090026069 Liao et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090041833 Bettinger et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090042970 Herschkowitz et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048555 Stryker et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090060986 Yum et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090085444 Alvarez Icaza Rivera et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090093912 Wilker Apr 2009 A1
20090099545 Nilsson et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090118662 Schnall May 2009 A1
20090144909 Skinner Jun 2009 A1
20090193590 Hata Aug 2009 A1
20090221971 Mejlhede et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090227988 Wood, Jr. et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090232685 Kamitani et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090317442 Banister et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100004638 Gibson Jan 2010 A1
20100074953 Chaouk et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100180384 Balonick et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110172645 Moga et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120029430 Banister et al. Feb 2012 A1
20130172180 Naumann Jul 2013 A1
20130337566 Schmidt Dec 2013 A1
20140048558 Lee Feb 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (40)
Number Date Country
2 477 181 Apr 2004 CA
1080829 Mar 2002 CN
1369039 Sep 2002 CN
1845967 Oct 2006 CN
1934776 Mar 2007 CN
199 12 606 Dec 2000 DE
0 723 982 Jul 1996 EP
0 736 556 Sep 1996 EP
0882890 Dec 1998 EP
1 454 935 Aug 2004 EP
5825326 Feb 1983 JP
60-235847 Nov 1985 JP
02-004826 Jan 1990 JP
02 137 930 May 1990 JP
08-283540 Oct 1996 JP
09 287 571 Nov 1997 JP
2004-514770 May 2004 JP
2004-261045 Sep 2004 JP
2004-269882 Sep 2004 JP
2005269773 Sep 2005 JP
2006353034 Dec 2006 JP
2008211915 Sep 2008 JP
2009046649 Mar 2009 JP
2009543902 Dec 2009 JP
WO 9617170 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9620971 Nov 1996 WO
WO 9742412 Nov 1997 WO
WO 0028215 May 2000 WO
WO 0244240 Jun 2002 WO
WO 2004031581 Apr 2004 WO
WO2004031580 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004076859 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2005061014 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005118008 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006065884 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2008079440 Jul 2008 WO
WO2008129549 Oct 2008 WO
WO 2009069086 Apr 2009 WO
WO2011032011 Mar 2011 WO
WO2011094747 Aug 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (129)
Entry
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,371, dated Dec. 18, 2014 (11 pgs).
Japanese Office Action (with translation) issued in related application No. 2012-551386, dated Jan. 28, 2015 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/395,627, dated Feb. 5, 2015 (7 pgs).
Chinese Board Decision, Appln. No. 200580048306.3, dated Dec. 26, 2014 (14 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Feb. 9, 2015 (11 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/918,466, dated Jul. 11, 2013 (36 pgs).
India Hearing Notice in Reference of Application No. 3011/CHENP/2007, dated Feb. 5, 2015 (1 pg).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,024, dated Feb. 24, 2015 (31 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Jun. 10, 2015 (25 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/347,597, dated Jun. 3, 2015 (33 pgs).
Indian Office Action issued in application No. 137/CHENP/2009, dated Mar. 17, 2015 (2 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880, dated Jul. 22, 2015 (23 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201180007957.3, dated May 22, 2015 (11 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,024, dated Aug. 4, 2015 (10 pgs).
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/395,627, dated Sep. 16, 2015 (22 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Sep. 9, 2015 (20 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201280057499.9, dated Aug. 28, 2015 (13 pgs).
Indian Office Action issued in application No. 137/CHENP/2009, dated Oct. 29, 2015 (2 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/918,466, dated Nov. 19, 2015 (25 pgs).
Extended European Search Report issued in application No. 12836396.7, dated Nov. 10, 2015 (12 pgs).
Chinese Office Action (w/translation) issued in application No. 201380022758.9, dated Dec. 14, 2015 (12 pgs).
Banister et al., “Molecular Engineering of Polymer Actuators for Biomedical and Industrial Use,” Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2012, vol. 8340 (20 pgs).
“An Electrochemical Microactuator: Principle and First Results”, Neagu et al. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 5, No. 1, Mar. 1996 (7 pgs).
“ElectroActive Polymers—EAPs,” downloaded from http://www.azom.com on Dec. 16, 2013 (5 pgs).
“Epoxy-Based Electroactive Polymer Gels”, Yoshioka Y and Calvert P, Experimental Mechanics, vol. 42, No. 4, Dec. 2002, pp. 404-408 (5 pgs).
“Magnetic Driven Compression Cascade and Packaging”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, IBM Corp., col. 38, co. 1, Jan. 1995 (3 pgs).
“Micro-Dispensing Positive Displacement Pump”, Anonymous, Research Disclosure, Mason Publications, Hampshire GB, vol. 374, No. 4, Jun. 1995 (9 pgs).
“Structure and Mechanism of Two Types of Micro-Pump Using Polymer Gel”, Hattori et al., Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 1992, MEMS 92, Proceedings. An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robot, IEEE Travemunde, Germany, Feb. 1992 (6 pgs).
Bar-Cohen, Y., “Electroactive polymers (EAP) actuators as artificial muscles: reality, potential and challenges,” SPIE Press, 2001, 671 pgs, (book description only, 4 pgs).
Canadian Official Action issued in Appln. No. 2,557,325, dated Feb. 8, 2011 (5 pgs).
Chinese Notification of ReExamination and English translation, Appln. or Pat. No. 200580048306.3; dated Aug. 22, 2014 (11 pgs).
Chinese Office Action (w/English translation) issued in corresponding application No. 200780032137.3, dated Mar. 12, 2013 (14 pgs).
Chinese Office Action and Translation dated Jul. 6, 2011 issued in Chinese Patent Appln. No. 200780032137.3 (7 pgs).
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2014 with English translation, Appln. No. or Patent No. 201180007957.3 (17 pgs).
Chinese Office Action, Application/Patent No. 200780032137.3, dated Dec. 23, 2011 (6 pgs).
Chinese Official Action + translation dated Feb. 1, 2011 issued in Appln. No. 200780032137.3, (8 pgs).
Chinese Official Action dated Mar. 17, 2011, Appin. No. 200580048306.3 (5 pgs).
Chinese Official Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Appln. Serial No. 200580048306.3 dated Nov. 4, 2011 (5 pgs).
European Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2010, Appln. No. 07 872 242.8-2102, (6 pgs).
European Official Action issued in Appln. No. 04714231.0, dated May 11, 2011 (2 pgs).
European Official Action issued in Appln. No. 04714231.0-2315/1611353, dated Oct. 4, 2010 (4 pgs).
European Official Action, dated Apr. 6, 2011 issued in Appln. No. 07 872 242.8-2102 (4 pages).
European Official Action, dated Aug. 29, 2011 issued in Appln. No. 07 872 242.8-2102 (6 pages).
European Search Report dated Feb. 18, 2011 issued in corresponding Appln. No. 10014840.2-2315 (7 pgs).
European Search Report dated Jun. 8, 2009, Serial No. 07872242.8-2102 (7 pgs).
First Examination Report dated Dec. 31, 2013, Indian Patent Application No. 3011/CHENP/2007 (2 pgs).
Indian Examination Report; Indian Patent Application Serial No. 2371/CHENP/2005, dated Sep. 7, 2006 (2 pgs).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US10/48489 dated Mar. 13, 2012 (12 pgs).
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Appln. Serial No. PCT/US2012/057129 dated Apr. 1, 2014 ( 7 pgs).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority issued in PCT/US09/34557, dated Apr. 13, 2009 (6 pgs).
Japanese Office Action with translation, Patent Appln. 2009-519642, dated Jul. 9, 2012 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Mar. 5, 2008 (41 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Sep. 16, 2008 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Jan. 2, 2009 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Jul. I, 2009 (7 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Dec. 28, 2009 (6 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated May 5, 2010 (7 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Sep. 15, 2010 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Nov. 23, 2010 (10 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Sep. 17, 2007 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Mar. 4, 2008 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Jul. 21, 2008 (10 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Dec. 15, 2008 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Feb. 2, 2011 (13 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Jul. 22, 2011 (11 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Jun. 30, 2014 (18 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,536, dated Nov. 29, 2010 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,152, dated May 23, 2011 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,024, dated Aug. 7, 2014 (17 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,648, dated Aug. 29, 2013 (5 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/395,627, dated Sep. 10, 2014 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Jun. 27, 2012 (14 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Nov. 9, 2012 (6 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,371, dated Aug. 21, 2014 (16 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880, dated Jun. 3, 2013 (8 pgs).
Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2012 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880 (26 pgs.).
Official Action received in corresponding Chinese Application No. 200480010203.3, dated Sep. 14, 2007 (19 pgs).
Official Action received in corresponding Chinese Application No. 200480010203.3, dated Nov. 14, 2008 (5 pgs).
Official Action received in corresponding EPO Application. No. 04 714 231.0-2315, dated Nov. 13, 2008 (5 pgs).
Official Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/721,800, dated Aug. 27, 2010 (13 pgs).
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Aug. 26, 2005, PCT/US04/005922 (11 pgs).
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 22, 2004, PCT/US04/005922 (17 pgs).
PCT International. Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 25, 2006, PCT/US05/45210 (10 pgs).
PCT International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jul. 7, 2008, PCT/US07/73188 (8 pgs).
PCT International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 19, 2009, PCT/US08/85421 (7 pgs).
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2011 PCT/US11/23375 (10 pgs).
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2013/031062, dated Sep. 16, 2014 (9 pgs).
Search Report and Written Opinion received in Applicant's corresponding European Patent Application Serial No. 05854009.7, dated Nov. 11, 2009 (8 pgs).
Supplemental European Search Report issued in EP04714231, dated Jan. 25, 2007 (2 pgs).
Unsolicited letter from Dr. Elson Silva, dated Oct. 21, 2010 (5 pgs).
Yoshioka et al., “Electrically Driven Miniature Hydrogels as Muscle-Like Acuators”, 2001; Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4329, pp. 216-222 (7 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Jun. 1, 2016 (17 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201280057499.9, dated Jun. 28, 2016 (13 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201180007957.3, dated Feb. 15, 2016 (12 pgs).
European Office Action issued in application No. 13 760 829.5, dated Jan. 26, 2016 (4 pgs).
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,024, dated Mar. 2, 2016 (24 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880, dated Feb. 26, 2016 (13 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Feb. 24, 2016 (22 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/347,597, dated Feb. 25, 2016 (32 pgs).
Chinese Office Action (w/translation) issued in application No. 201510131814.3, dated Aug. 22, 2016 (16 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201180007957.3, dated Oct. 24, 2016 (12 pgs).
European Invitation issued in application No. 11 737 864.6, dated Dec. 19, 2016 (2 pgs).
European Search Report issued in application No. 13760829.5, dated Nov. 28, 2016 (11 pgs).
Indian Hearing Notice issued in application No. 137/CHENP/2009, dated Sep. 11, 2016 (3 pgs).
Japanese Office Action (no translation) issued in application No. 2010-537033, dated Sep. 10, 2013 (1 pg).
Japanese Office Action (no translation) issued in application No. 2010-537033, dated Apr. 10, 2013 (2 pgs).
Japanese Office Action (w/translation) issued in application No. 2015-500577, dated Jan. 4, 2017 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/918,466, dated Feb. 23, 2017 (38 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Sep. 20, 2016 (21 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/385,403, dated Dec. 7, 2016 (22 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201380022758.9, dated Aug. 15, 2016 (8 pgs).
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880, dated Oct. 7, 2016 (23 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/347,597 dated Oct. 7, 2016 (22 pgs).
U.S. Appl. No. 14/385,403, filed Sep. 15, 2014.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/357,914, filed Nov. 21, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/997,254, filed Jan. 15, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, filed Feb. 24, 2004.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,534, filed Oct. 20, 2005.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/721,800, filed Jun. 14, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, filed Jan. 9, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,536, filed Mar. 30, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880, filed Jun. 2, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,152, filed Dec. 23, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,024, filed Jan. 31, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,648, filed Apr. 25, 2011.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/395,627, filed Mar. 12, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, filed Mar. 19, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,371, filed Nov. 4, 2013.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/347,597, filed Mar. 26, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150094448 A1 Apr 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61610471 Mar 2012 US