Mixed reality and virtual reality computing devices, such as head mounted display (HMD) systems and handheld mobile devices (e.g. smart phones, tablet computers, etc.), may be configured to display information to a user about virtual and/or real objects in the field of view of the user and/or a field of view of a camera of the device. For example, an HMD device may be configured to display—using a see-through display system or an opaque display system with camera pass-through or other outward sensor—virtual environments with real world objects mixed in, real world environments with virtual objects mixed in, or pure virtual worlds. Similarly, a mobile device may display such information using a camera viewfinder window.
This Background is provided to introduce a brief context for the Summary and Detailed Description that follow. This Background is not intended to be an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter nor be viewed as limiting the claimed subject matter to implementations that solve any or all of the disadvantages or problems presented above.
An HMD device is configured with a sensor package that enables head tracking to determine the device user's proximity to holographic objects in a mixed reality or virtual reality environment. A fade volume including concentrically-arranged volumetric shells is placed around the user including a near shell that is closest to the user, and a far shell that is farthest from the user. When a holographic object is beyond the far shell, the HMD device renders the object with full opacity (i.e., with no transparency). As the user moves towards a holographic object and it intersects the far shell, its opacity begins to fade out with increasing transparency to reveal the background behind it. The transparency of the holographic object increases as the object gets closer to the near shell and the object becomes fully transparent when the near shell reaches it so that the background becomes fully visible.
In various illustrative examples, alpha compositing is utilized and an alpha value is determined on a per-pixel basis depending on respective proximity to the near and far shells. A transparency blend curve may be utilized to smoothly blend the per-pixel alpha value over the distance between the near and far shells. Fading opacity and increasing transparency as the user approaches holographic objects can help to reduce visual discomfort and prevent occlusion of the background that the objects would otherwise hide. In another example, transparency may be implemented using a dithering technique.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure. It may be appreciated that the above-described subject matter may be implemented as a computer-controlled apparatus, a computer process, a computing system, or as an article of manufacture such as one or more computer-readable storage media. These and various other features may be apparent from a reading of the following Detailed Description and a review of the associated drawings.
Like reference numerals indicate like elements in the drawings. Elements are not drawn to scale unless otherwise indicated.
When experiencing a mixed or virtual reality environment while using an HMD device, users can move into holographic virtual objects as they move around in a corresponding real world space. Such movement can present technical challenges for the HMD device in accurately rendering objects as the draw distance decreases (and approaches zero) and may cause user discomfort due to mismatch in clip planes between each eye. In addition, as a holographic object fills the field of view of the HMD device as the user gets closer, the object can occlude vision of the floor or other objects. The present smart transparency provides for holographic object opacity that fades out (and transparency increases) as the HMD device user approaches to reduce both visual discomfort and occlusion of other objects such as the background object and floor.
In an illustrative example, as shown in
The HMD device 104 is configured to determine the position of the user in the virtual reality environment and his relationship to holographic objects by tracking the user's position, including his head, in the physical environment 200. As shown in
The sensor package can also support gaze tracking to ascertain a direction of the user's gaze which may be used along with the head position and orientation data in some implementations. The HMD device 104 may further be configured to expose a user interface (UI) 310 that can display system messages, prompts, and the like as well as expose controls that the user may manipulate. The controls can be virtual or physical in some cases. The UI 310 may also be configured to operate with sensed gestures and voice using, for example, voice commands or natural language.
To determine when a user is close to a holographic object, the HMD device 104 places a fade volume 500 around the user 102, as shown in
The fade volume 500 can be configured using a variety of geometries such as the cylinder as depicted in
As the user moves in the virtual reality environment 100 (
As shown in
The alpha compositing of the transparency may be performed on a per-pixel basis and the alpha value can be varied using a transparency blend curve that is imposed over the spatial distance between the near and far shells, as represented by reference numeral 805 in
In some implementations of smart transparency, adjustments may be made to properties of a holographic object other than alpha value. For example, the RGB (red, green, blue) channel values of a holographic object can be adjusted to fade the object to black. When implemented in an HMD device that uses an additive display, holographic content rendered in black is transparent so that real world objects are visible. Such real world visibility can be utilized in mixed reality environments that support a combination of holographic and real world content. For example, as the user moves closer to a holographic object, it is rendered to black to become transparent and reveal portions of the real world that are behind it.
Other techniques to implement smart transparency may also be utilized for a given application. For example, in addition to alpha compositing, dithering techniques such as ordered dithering can be utilized in which a threshold matrix provides multiple dithering patterns for the holographic object to produce varying degrees of transparency. A pixel in the holographic object is discarded (and become invisible) when it is below a given threshold. The threshold matrix can be implemented as a dither matrix (also commonly referred to as an index matrix or Bayer matrix) which typically provides a regular dithering pattern, however, random permutations of the threshold values can also be utilized in some cases.
Method 900 shown in
In step 915, when the holographic object is located between the near and far shells, it is rendered with increased transparency as the location is closer to the near shell. When the location intersects the near shell, the holographic object may be rendered with full transparency to reveal the background of the environment. In step 920, the holographic object is rendered by the HMD device when it is located beyond the far shell. In step 925, the rendering of the holographic object may be performed using alpha compositing and on per-pixel basis in some implementations. An alpha value can be interpolated based on a transparency curve that is established over the spatial distance between the near and far shells. The interpolation may be linear in some cases. Rendering may also be alternatively implemented using a dithering technique such as ordered dithering.
Method 1000 shown in
Method 1100 in
Turning now to various illustrative implementation details, a mixed and/or virtual reality display device according to the present arrangement may take any suitable form, including but not limited to near-eye devices such as the HMD device 104 and/or other portable/mobile devices. A see-through display may be used in some implementations while an opaque (i.e., non-see-through) display using a camera-based pass-through or outward facing sensor, for example, may be used in other implementations.
The display system 1200 may further include a gaze detection subsystem 1210 configured for detecting a direction of gaze of each eye of a user or a direction or location of focus, as described above. Gaze detection subsystem 1210 may be configured to determine gaze directions of each of a user's eyes in any suitable manner. For example, in the illustrative example shown, a gaze detection subsystem 1210 includes one or more glint sources 1212, such as infrared light sources, that are configured to cause a glint of light to reflect from each eyeball of a user, and one or more image sensors 1214, such as inward-facing sensors, that are configured to capture an image of each eyeball of the user. Changes in the glints from the user's eyeballs and/or a location of a user's pupil, as determined from image data gathered using the image sensor(s) 1214, may be used to determine a direction of gaze.
In addition, a location at which gaze lines projected from the user's eyes intersect the external display may be used to determine an object at which the user is gazing (e.g. a displayed virtual object and/or real background object). Gaze detection subsystem 1210 may have any suitable number and arrangement of light sources and image sensors. In some implementations, the gaze detection subsystem 1210 may be omitted.
The display system 1200 may also include additional sensors. For example, display system 1200 may comprise a global positioning system (GPS) subsystem 1216 to allow a location of the display system 1200 to be determined. This may help to identify real world objects, such as buildings, etc. that may be located in the user's adjoining physical environment.
The display system 1200 may further include one or more motion sensors 1218 (e.g., inertial, multi-axis gyroscopic, or acceleration sensors) to detect movement and position/orientation/pose of a user's head when the user is wearing the system as part of an augmented reality HMD device. Motion data may be used, potentially along with eye-tracking glint data and outward-facing image data, for gaze detection, as well as for image stabilization to help correct for blur in images from the outward-facing image sensor(s) 1206. The use of motion data may allow changes in gaze location to be tracked even if image data from outward-facing image sensor(s) 1206 cannot be resolved.
In addition, motion sensors 1218, as well as microphone(s) 1208 and gaze detection subsystem 1210, also may be employed as user input devices, such that a user may interact with the display system 1200 via gestures of the eye, neck and/or head, as well as via verbal commands in some cases. It may be understood that sensors illustrated in
The display system 1200 can further include a controller 1220 having a logic subsystem 1222 and a data storage subsystem 1224 in communication with the sensors, gaze detection subsystem 1210, display subsystem 1204, and/or other components through a communications subsystem 1226. The communications subsystem 1226 can also facilitate the display system being operated in conjunction with remotely located resources, such as processing, storage, power, data, and services. That is, in some implementations, an HMD device can be operated as part of a system that can distribute resources and capabilities among different components and subsystems.
The storage subsystem 1224 may include instructions stored thereon that are executable by logic subsystem 1222, for example, to receive and interpret inputs from the sensors, to identify location and movements of a user, to identify real objects using surface reconstruction and other techniques, and dim/fade the display based on distance to objects so as to enable the objects to be seen by the user, among other tasks.
The display system 1200 is configured with one or more audio transducers 1228 (e.g., speakers, earphones, etc.) so that audio can be utilized as part of an augmented reality experience. A power management subsystem 1230 may include one or more batteries 1232 and/or protection circuit modules (PCMs) and an associated charger interface 1234 and/or remote power interface for supplying power to components in the display system 1200.
It may be appreciated that the depicted display devices 104 and 1200 are described for the purpose of example, and thus are not meant to be limiting. It is to be further understood that the display device may include additional and/or alternative sensors, cameras, microphones, input devices, output devices, etc. than those shown without departing from the scope of the present arrangement. Additionally, the physical configuration of a display device and its various sensors and subcomponents may take a variety of different forms without departing from the scope of the present arrangement.
The visor includes see-through front and rear shields 1404 and 1406 respectively that can be molded using transparent materials to facilitate unobstructed vision to the optical displays and the surrounding real world environment. Treatments may be applied to the front and rear shields such as tinting, mirroring, anti-reflective, anti-fog, and other coatings, and various colors and finishes may also be utilized. The front and rear shields are affixed to a chassis 1505 as depicted in the partially exploded view in
The sealed visor 1402 can physically protect sensitive internal components, including an optics display subassembly 1602 (shown in the disassembled view in
As shown in
The computing system 1900 includes a logic subsystem 1902 and a storage subsystem 1904. The computing system 1900 may optionally include a display subsystem 1906, an input subsystem 1908, a communication subsystem 1910, and/or other components not shown in
The logic subsystem 1902 includes one or more physical devices configured to execute instructions. For example, the logic subsystem 1902 may be configured to execute instructions that are part of one or more applications, services, programs, routines, libraries, objects, components, data structures, or other logical constructs. Such instructions may be implemented to perform a task, implement a data type, transform the state of one or more components, or otherwise arrive at a desired result.
The logic subsystem 1902 may include one or more processors configured to execute software instructions. Additionally or alternatively, the logic subsystem 1902 may include one or more hardware or firmware logic machines configured to execute hardware or firmware instructions. The processors of the logic subsystem 1902 may be single-core or multi-core, and the programs executed thereon may be configured for sequential, parallel, or distributed processing. The logic subsystem 1902 may optionally include individual components that are distributed among two or more devices, which can be remotely located and/or configured for coordinated processing. Aspects of the logic subsystem 1902 may be virtualized and executed by remotely accessible, networked computing devices configured in a cloud-computing configuration.
The storage subsystem 1904 includes one or more physical devices configured to hold data and/or instructions executable by the logic subsystem 1902 to implement the methods and processes described herein. When such methods and processes are implemented, the state of the storage subsystem 1904 may be transformed—for example, to hold different data.
The storage subsystem 1904 may include removable media and/or built-in devices. The storage subsystem 1904 may include optical memory devices (e.g., CD (compact disc), DVD (digital versatile disc), HD-DVD (high definition DVD), Blu-ray disc, etc.), semiconductor memory devices (e.g., RAM (random access memory), ROM (read only memory), EPROM (erasable programmable ROM), EEPROM (electrically erasable ROM), etc.) and/or magnetic memory devices (e.g., hard-disk drive, floppy-disk drive, tape drive, MRAM (magneto-resistive RAM), etc.), among others. The storage subsystem 1904 may include volatile, nonvolatile, dynamic, static, read/write, read-only, random-access, sequential-access, location-addressable, file-addressable, and/or content-addressable devices.
It may be appreciated that the storage subsystem 1904 includes one or more physical devices, and excludes propagating signals per se. However, in some implementations, aspects of the instructions described herein may be propagated by a pure signal (e.g., an electromagnetic signal, an optical signal, etc.) using a communications medium, as opposed to being stored on a storage device. Furthermore, data and/or other forms of information pertaining to the present arrangement may be propagated by a pure signal.
In some embodiments, aspects of the logic subsystem 1902 and of the storage subsystem 1904 may be integrated together into one or more hardware-logic components through which the functionality described herein may be enacted. Such hardware-logic components may include field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), program- and application-specific integrated circuits (PASIC/ASICs), program- and application-specific standard products (PSSP/ASSPs), system-on-a-chip (SOC) systems, and complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), for example.
When included, the display subsystem 1906 may be used to present a visual representation of data held by storage subsystem 1904. This visual representation may take the form of a graphical user interface (GUI). As the present described methods and processes change the data held by the storage subsystem, and thus transform the state of the storage subsystem, the state of the display subsystem 1906 may likewise be transformed to visually represent changes in the underlying data. The display subsystem 1906 may include one or more display devices utilizing virtually any type of technology. Such display devices may be combined with logic subsystem 1902 and/or storage subsystem 1904 in a shared enclosure in some cases, or such display devices may be peripheral display devices in others.
When included, the input subsystem 1908 may include or interface with one or more user-input devices such as a keyboard, mouse, touch screen, or game controller. In some embodiments, the input subsystem may include or interface with selected natural user input (NUI) components. Such components may be integrated or peripheral, and the transduction and/or processing of input actions may be handled on- or off-board. Exemplary NUI components may include a microphone for speech and/or voice recognition; an infrared, color, stereoscopic, and/or depth camera for machine vision and/or gesture recognition; a head tracker, eye tracker, accelerometer, and/or gyroscope for motion detection and/or intent recognition; as well as electric-field sensing components for assessing brain activity.
When included, the communication subsystem 1910 may be configured to communicatively couple the computing system 1900 with one or more other computing devices. The communication subsystem 1910 may include wired and/or wireless communication devices compatible with one or more different communication protocols. As non-limiting examples, the communication subsystem may be configured for communication via a wireless telephone network, or a wired or wireless local- or wide-area network. In some embodiments, the communication subsystem may allow computing system 1900 to send and/or receive messages to and/or from other devices using a network such as the Internet.
Various exemplary embodiments of the present smart transparency are now presented by way of illustration and not as an exhaustive list of all embodiments. An example includes a method performed by a head mounted display (HMD) device employed by a user occupying a physical environment, the HMD device supporting rendering of a mixed reality or virtual reality environment that includes holographic objects, comprising: placing a fade volume around the user, the fade volume having a near shell that is proximate to the user and a far shell that is distal to the user; determining a location of a holographic object with respect to the near and far shells by tracking the user's location within the mixed reality or virtual reality environment; and rendering the holographic object with transparency when it is located between the near and far shells, the transparency increasing as the object becomes closer to the near shell.
In another example, the method further includes rendering the holographic object with full opacity when the holographic object is located beyond the far shell of the fade volume. In another example, the method further includes rendering the holographic object with full transparency when the holographic object intersects the near shell of the fade volume. In another example, the method further includes performing the rendering of the holographic object using alpha compositing and interpolating an alpha value based on a transparency curve that is established over a spatial distance between the near and far shells of the fade volume or performing the rendering of the holographic object using ordered dithering. In another example, the transparency curve is a linear curve and the alpha value is interpolated on a linear basis. In another example, the method further includes performing the alpha compositing for the holographic object on a per-pixel basis. In another example, the method further includes performing head tracking to determine a proximity of the fade volume to the holographic object. In another example, the head tracking utilizes a sensor package in the HMD device for generating depth data. In another example, the method further includes generating the depth data using one or more depth-from-stereo imaging analyses or using a depth sensor. In another example, the method further includes using the sensor package to determine a current height of the user's head above the ground of the physical environment. In another example, the method further includes sizing the fade volume according to the height of the user's head. In another example, the method further includes configuring a radius of the far shell to be between one and one-half and two and one-half times a radius of the near shell. In another example, the method further includes configuring the radius of the near shell to be approximately one-half meter and the radius of the far shell to be approximately one meter. In another example, the method further includes performing the transparent rendering of the holographic object to show a background of the mixed or virtual reality environment, the background including one or more of virtual ground, real ground, other holographic objects, or real objects. In another example, the method further includes configuring the near and far shells using one of cylinder, sphere, capsule, or non-radial volume. In another example, the method further includes configuring the near and far shells as concentrically aligned cylinders having different radii or as spheres having different radii that share a common center.
A further example includes a head mounted display (HMD) device operable by a user in a physical environment, comprising: one or more processors; a display having areas onto which a mixed reality or virtual reality environment is rendered to the user; a sensor package; and one or more memory devices storing computer-readable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, perform a method comprising the steps of: performing head tracking of the user within the physical environment using the sensor package, maintaining a holographic geometry including one or more holographic objects having known locations within the mixed reality or virtual reality environment, responsively to the head tracking, determining the user's location with respect to the holographic geometry, and rendering portions of the holographic geometry with transparency based on the user's location so that the rendered portions increase in transparency as the distance between the user's location and rendered portions decreases.
In another example, the HMD device further includes determining a ratio of distances of the rendered portions with respective near and far shells of a fade volume that is placed around the user and controlling alpha blending depending on the ratio on a per-pixel basis.
Another example includes one or more computer readable memories storing computer-executable instructions for rendering a mixed reality or virtual reality environment within a variable field of view of a head mounted display (HMD) device operating in a real world environment, the method comprising the steps of: configuring display optics incorporated into the HMD device for selectively rendering a holographic object with varying degrees of opacity; dynamically determining a location of a holographic object with respect to each of a near and a far threshold using sensors incorporated into the HMD device; setting opacity for a rendered holographic object to a maximum value when the holographic object is located beyond the far threshold; and when the holographic object is located between the near threshold and the far threshold, based on the location, setting opacity for a rendered holographic object from a range spanning a minimum value and the maximum value.
In a further example, the opacity is increased using one of alpha compositing or dithering as the distance between the holographic object and the near threshold increases and further including enclosing the user within a fade volume having a near shell that is located at the near threshold and a far shell that is located at the far threshold, the near and far shells being selected from one of cylinder, sphere, capsule, or non-radial volume.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application claims benefit and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/029,351 filed Jul. 25, 2014, entitled “Head Mounted Display Experiences” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5748189 | Trueblood | May 1998 | A |
5819206 | Horton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5877748 | Redlich | Mar 1999 | A |
6012926 | Hodges et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023275 | Horvitz | Feb 2000 | A |
6329986 | Cheng | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6396495 | Parghi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396497 | Reichlen | May 2002 | B1 |
6529331 | Massof et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6552698 | Walker | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6741241 | Jaubert et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6804607 | Wood | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6898266 | Griffith | May 2005 | B2 |
7274380 | Navab et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7386799 | Clanton et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7400322 | Urbach | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7486817 | Yanagawa et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7538775 | Ishihara | May 2009 | B2 |
7542210 | Chirieleison, Sr. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7557774 | Baudisch et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
8049750 | Gloudemans et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8266536 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8405680 | Cardoso Lopes | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8576247 | Avkarogullari et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8611015 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8751969 | Matsuda et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754931 | Gassel et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8780014 | Border et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793620 | Stafford | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9372345 | Fujimaki | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9443352 | Glover | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9645397 | da Veiga et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9776460 | Mita | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9858720 | da Veiga et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9865089 | Burns et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9904055 | Burns et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20010035845 | Zwern | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020044152 | Abbott et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020154214 | Scallie et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181115 | Massof et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030091226 | Cahill | May 2003 | A1 |
20050024388 | Takemoto | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050143887 | Kinoshita | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050179703 | Johnson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060050070 | Matsui | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092178 | Tanguay, Jr. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095207 | Reid | May 2006 | A1 |
20060241827 | Fukuchi | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060284792 | Foxlin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070057946 | Albeck | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070116326 | Aonuma et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132662 | Morita | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080174659 | McDowall | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195315 | Hu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080284864 | Kotake | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090160985 | Javidi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167785 | Wong | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090189974 | Deering | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090199275 | Brock et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090325699 | Delgiannidis | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100208035 | Pinault | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208057 | Meier | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226017 | Spaller | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100315413 | Izadi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029903 | Schooleman et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043627 | Werling et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110140994 | Noma | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110242090 | Keating | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120011445 | Gilboa | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120052917 | Kim | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056876 | Lee et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068913 | Bar-Zeev et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120092328 | Flaks | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113092 | Bar-Zeev et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120195471 | Newcombe | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237116 | Xiao | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249741 | Maciocci | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120309522 | Westlund et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120313839 | Smithwick | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120327116 | Liu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130044128 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050258 | Liu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050432 | Perez et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083007 | Geisner et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130083018 | Geisner | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088413 | Raffle et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093789 | Liu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130127860 | Hadap | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127980 | Haddick | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137076 | Perez et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130141419 | Mount et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147686 | Clavin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130194259 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222589 | Lalonde et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222647 | Ishihara | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130257751 | Stafford | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257899 | Baron et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287290 | Owechko | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300637 | Smits et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307855 | Lamb et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326364 | Latta et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328927 | Mount et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335301 | Wong | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335303 | Maciocci et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336629 | Mulholland et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342564 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342570 | Kinnebrew et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002444 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019874 | Li et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049559 | Fleck et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098009 | Prest | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104142 | Bickerstaff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140125557 | Issayeva | May 2014 | A1 |
20140130041 | Luxenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132484 | Pandey et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132715 | Raghoebardayal | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139639 | Wagner | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140579 | Takemoto | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145988 | Ishizawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140168264 | Harrison | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176530 | Pathre | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184550 | Hennessey et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204117 | Kinnebrew et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221090 | Mutschler et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240351 | Scavezze et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253605 | Border et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267400 | Mabbutt | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140317555 | Choi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140363073 | Shirakyan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140372957 | Keane et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150070274 | Morozov | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150091780 | Lyren | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150138081 | Iwatsu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138239 | Kim | May 2015 | A1 |
20150143459 | Molnar | May 2015 | A1 |
20150145887 | Forutanpour | May 2015 | A1 |
20150153833 | Pinault et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150178956 | Davis | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150186016 | Li | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150205106 | Norden | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150243078 | Watson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150261293 | Wilairat | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150325176 | Koyama | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355709 | Lee et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150355735 | Matsuda | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150356788 | Abe | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160011724 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160025981 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026242 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027212 | Da veiga et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027213 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027214 | Memmott et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027215 | Burns et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027216 | da veiga et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027217 | da veiga et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160027218 | Salter et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160314622 | Davis et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20180003982 | Burns et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180101994 | Da veiga et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1922651 | Feb 2007 | CN |
101162524 | Apr 2008 | CN |
101529899 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101813976 | Aug 2010 | CN |
102419631 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102473068 | May 2012 | CN |
102598677 | Jul 2012 | CN |
101540020 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102663722 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102918568 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102959616 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103064188 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103076875 | May 2013 | CN |
103091844 | May 2013 | CN |
103377476 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103460256 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103487937 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103493106 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103635849 | Mar 2014 | CN |
103761085 | Apr 2014 | CN |
106662924 | May 2017 | CN |
1521482 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2164045 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2013238693 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2009128781 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2013029097 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013052855 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013057649 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2013085193 | Jun 2013 | WO |
2013155217 | Oct 2013 | WO |
2014188798 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015108887 | Jul 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Oct. 28, 2015, (10 Pages total). |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041864”, dated Oct. 26, 2015, (11 Pages total). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Oct. 30, 2015, (11 pages total). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041867”, dated Nov. 25, 2015, (11 Pages total). |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”,dated Nov. 16, 2015, (12 Pages total). |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Nov. 16, 2015, (11 Pages total). |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Jan. 25, 2016, 12 Pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Nov. 27, 2015, 12 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Jun. 27, 2016, 7 Pages. |
Duchowski, Andrew, “Chapter 7—Head-Mounted System Software Development”, In Book Eye Tracking Methodology, Theory and Practice, Part 2, Jan. 1, 2007, pp. 69-86. (18 pages total). |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Jul. 1, 2016, (6 Pages). |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Jun. 13, 2016, 5 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“Second Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Jun. 20, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041868”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041863”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 8 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041862”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 6 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041861”, dated Oct. 13, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041865”, dated Oct. 19, 2016, 7 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/041866”, dated Oct. 27, 2016, 9 Pages. |
Nilsen, et al., “Tankwar—Tabletop War Gaming in Augmented Reality”, In 2nd International Workshop on Pervasive Gaming Applications, PerGames. vol. 5, Retrieved on: Sep. 12, 2014, 5 pages. |
Murray, et al., “Comparison of Head Gaze and Head and Eye Gaze within an Immersive Environment”, In Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, Oct. 2, 2006, 7 pages. |
Steptoe, et al., “Eye Tracking for Avatar Eye Gaze Control during Object-Focused Multiparty Interaction in Immersive Collaborative Virtual Environments”, In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, Mar. 14, 2009, 8 pages. |
Suma, et al., “Sharing Space in Mixed and Virtual Reality Environments Using a Low-Cost Depth Sensor”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Virtual Innovation, Mar. 19, 2011, 2 pages. |
Ponto, et al., “Perceptual Calibration for Immersive Display Environments”, In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 19, Issue 4, Apr. 2013, pp. 691-700, 10 pages. |
Li, et al., “On the Anisotropy of Perceived Ground Extents and the Interpretation of Walked Distance as a Measure of Perception”, In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 39, Issue 2, Apr. 2013, 33 pages. |
Li, et al., “The Underestimation of Egocentric Distance: Evidence from Frontal Matching Tasks”, In Proceedings of Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, Oct. 2011, 15 pages. |
Howe, Bo, “Holographic Computer Monitor”, Published on: Aug. 18, 2010, Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlxj7fY-38, 2 pages. |
Angley, Natalie, “Glasses to make you a real-life Tony Stark”, Published on: Oct. 31, 2013, Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/10/31/tech/innovation/meta-augmented-reality-glasses/, 4 pages. |
Hiner, Jason, “Future iPhone concept: Laser keyboard and holographic display”, Published on: Aug. 31, 2011, Available at: http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/tech-sanity-check/future-iphone-concept-laser-keyboard-and-holographic-display/, 6 pages. |
Chen, Jian, “A Virtual Environment System for the Comparative Study of Dome and HMD”, In Master Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, May 2002, 104 pages. |
McCarthy, Mike, “HP intros new versions of its mobile and tower workstations”, Retrieved on: Sep. 11, 2014, Available at: http://postperspective.com/hp-intros-new-versions-pro-offerings/, 5 pages. |
Nakashima, et al., “A 2D-3D Integrated Environment for Cooperative Work”, In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Nov. 7, 2005, 7 pages. |
Pierce, et al., “Image Plane Interaction Techniques in 3D Immersive Environments”, In Proceedings of the symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, Apr. 30, 1997, 10 pages. |
Regenbrecht, et al., “Interaction in a Collaborative Augmented Reality Environment”, In Proceedings of CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 20, 2002, 2 pages. |
“Touchscreen interface for seamless data transfer between the real and virtual worlds”, Published on: Apr. 15, 2013, Available at: http://www.diginfo.tv/v/13-0025-r-en.php, 8 pages. |
Urban, John, “Five Free Tools for Multi-Monitor Computer Set-Ups”, Published on: Sep. 16, 2009, Available at: http://sixrevisions.com/tools/five-free-tools-for-multi-monitor-computer-set-ups/, 17 pages. |
Steinicke, et al., “Natural Perspective Projections for Head-Mounted Displays”, In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Jul. 2011, 12 pages. |
Hogue, David, “What Are Index and Alpha Transparency?”, Published on: Mar. 3, 2011, Available at: http://www.idux.com/2011/02/27/what-are-index-and-alpha-transparency/, 14 pages. |
Jimenez, et al., “Gaze-based Interaction for Virtual Environments”, In Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 14, Issue 19, Nov. 2008, 14 pages. |
Kinoshita, et al., “A Fast and Robust 3D Head Pose and Gaze Estimation System”, In 8th IEEE International Conference onAutomatic Face & Gesture Recognition, Sep. 17, 2008, 2 pages. |
Peterson, et al., “Evaluation of Alternative Label Placement Techniques in Dynamic Virtual Environments”, In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Smart Graphics, May 22, 2009, 7 pages. |
Kuhl, et al., “HMD Calibration and its Effects on Distance Judgments”, In Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and Visualization, Aug. 9, 2008, 24 pages. |
Kim. et al., “3D Reconstruction of Stereo Images for Interaction between Real and Virtual Worlds”, In Proceedings of the Second IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Oct. 7, 2003, 9 pages. |
Amar, et al., “Synthesizing Reality for Realistic Physical Behavior of Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality Applications for Smart-Phones”, In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, Mar. 16, 2013, pp. 123-124, 2 pages. |
Lavoie, et al., “Constructing 3D Virtual Reality Objects from 2D Images of Real Objects Using NURBS”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer Interfaces, and Measurement Systems Ostuni, Jun. 25, 2007, 8 pages. |
Nóbrega, et al., “Magnetic Augmented Reality: Virtual Objects in Your Space”, In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, May 21, 2012, pp. 332-335, 4 pages. |
Izadi, et al., “KinectFusion: Real-time 3D Reconstruction and Interaction Using a Moving Depth Camera”, In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Oct. 16, 2011, 10 pages. |
Kalkofen, et al., “Visualization Techniques for Augmented Reality”, In Proceedings of Handbook of Augmented Reality, Jul. 13, 2011, pp. 65-98, 34 pages. |
Maimone, et al., “Computational Augmented Reality Eyeglasses”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Oct. 1, 2013, 10 pages. |
“Virtual Reality (VR) and Mixed Reality (MR) technologies”, Retrieved on: Sep. 12, 2014, Available at: http://www.vr-hyperspace.eu/about-vr-hyperspace/technology/77-virtual-reality-vr-and-mixed-reality-mr-technologies (5 pages total). |
“Gaze Awareness for Videoconferencing: A Software Approach” (by Jim Gemmell and Kentaro Toyama, Microsoft; C. Lawrence Zitnick and Thomas Kang, Carnegie Mellon University; Steven Seitz, University of Washington, in 1070-986X/00/$10.00 © 2000 IEEE) (10 pages total). |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997”, dated Oct. 19, 2017, 24 pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Dec. 21, 2017, 42 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/841,047”, dated Jan. 25, 2018, 85 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,109”, dated May 17, 2018, 23 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated May 17, 2018, 35 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated May 2, 2018, 41 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997”, dated Dec. 13, 2018, 15 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041151.4”, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041403.3”, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 18 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated Oct. 13, 2017, 36 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated Oct. 5, 2018, 32 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,774”, dated Mar. 24, 2017, 29 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/611,447”, dated Dec. 27, 2016, 20 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850”, dated Jan. 12, 2017, 15 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850”, dated Jun. 26, 2017, 15 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,850”, dated Jun. 23, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Apr. 7, 2017, 20 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Jan. 22, 2018, 29 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Sep. 14, 2017, 24 Pages. |
“Non-final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/628,539”, dated Nov. 17, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 21 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Mar. 20, 2017, 24 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Jul. 12, 2016, 20 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,695”, dated Aug. 29, 2017, 12 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Dec. 22, 2016, 56 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Mar. 23, 2017, 57 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/688,817”, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 50 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,109”, dated Jun. 16, 2017, 19 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,109”, dated Oct. 4, 2017, 17 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,109”, dated Jan. 3, 2017, 19 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/697,227”, dated Aug. 12, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Feb. 7, 2017, 37 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Sep. 26, 2016, 29 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/723,065”, dated Jul. 24, 2017, 38 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997”, dated Apr. 5, 2018, 17 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041327.6”, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 20 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041345.4”, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 19 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041348.8”, dated Nov. 30, 2018, 15 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041349.2”, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 19 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041369.X”, dated Dec. 6, 2018, 10 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0000546”, dated Apr. 13, 2018, 14 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0000546”, dated Sep. 14, 2018, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Colombian Patent Application No. NC2017/0000546”, dated Jan. 25, 2017, 2 Pages. (w/o English Translation). |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15748368.6”, dated Feb. 15, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041217.X”, dated Feb. 28, 2019, 22 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15748367.8”, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15748369.4”, dated Apr. 11, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15763668.9”, dated Apr. 9, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,997”, dated Jun. 26, 2019, 15 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041327.6”, dated Jun. 11, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041345.4”, dated Jun. 11, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041349.2”, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041403.3”, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 17 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041348.8”, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15745719.3”, dated Jul. 24, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Third Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041345.4”, dated Sep. 2, 2019, 7 Pages. |
“Third Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580041327.6”, dated Aug. 23, 2019, 6 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15763668.9”, dated Aug. 29, 2019, 4 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent No. 15748367.8”, dated Aug. 29, 2019, 4 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160025982 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62029351 | Jul 2014 | US |