Below, with reference to
In the following description of
Reference number 4 designates a smoke warning transmitter which operates for example on the basis of the diffused-light principle with a specified alarm threshold. In the case where there is no smoke and there are no particles in the space, the receiver of the smoke warning transmitter 4 does not receive a signal because there is a barrier 52 between the light source 50 and said receiver of the smoke warning transmitter 4. However, if smoke particles (or other particles, such as for example aerosols) are encountered in this region, the light is diffused and the receiver registers a corresponding signal rise. If this signal rise exceeds a specified threshold value, then the smoke warning transmitter issues an alarm.
As has already been discussed, this functional principal can be confused in that not only smoke particles but all types of aerosols cause light diffusion and can thus cause the smoke warning transmitter to assume an alarm state. In practical application it has been shown that for example fog, dust or even the use of insecticides can cause false alarms.
Reference characters 6 designate a humidity sensor and/or temperature sensor which can be provided in addition or as an option.
As shown in
The camera module 2 is connected to a data connection 26 by means of a data connection 18 by way of a network 14, wherein said data connection 26 in turn is connected to a computer unit 16. The smoke warning transmitter 4 is connected with a data connection 20 to the network 14 which in turn is connected to the computer unit 16 by way of data connection 26. The temperature of the humidity sensors is connected to the computer unit 16 by way of corresponding data connections 22 and 24 by way of the network 14 and the data connection 26. The computer unit comprises a data output device 28. For example an alarm signal can be output by way of this data output device 28. The data output device 28 can for example be connected by means of a corresponding optical display or acoustic display.
According to the embodiment shown in
However, it should be pointed out that for example the computer unit 16 can also be arranged at some distance for example from the housing 10 of the smoke alarm system. A connection can then be implemented by means of the network 14 and the data connections 18, 20, 22, 24 and 26.
The computer unit 16, which for example comprises a CPU, which computer unit 16 can for example be a commercially available PC, is adapted so that the output signals of the camera module 2 and the output of the smoke warning transmitter 4 are processed. In other words, only one computer unit 16 is provided to process the output signals of the camera module 2 and of the smoke warning transmitter 4. The computer unit 16 comprises means for processing or adjusting the output signals of the camera module 2 and of the smoke warning transmitter 4 together. This is explained below by means of an example.
For example, the smoke warning transmitter 4 would output an alarm signal in a fog situation. However, comparative adjustment of this signal with the image taken by means of the camera module 2, by means of the computer unit 16, shows that only fog is present, while in fact no smoke situation or alarm situation exists. Therefore the output of an alarm signal by means of the alarm output device 28 can be suppressed.
Furthermore, for example, in spite of an alarm acquisition by means of the smoke warning transmitter, it can be detected that for example only insecticide has been sprayed in the cabin or in the cargo compartment of the aircraft. In such a case too, the output of an alarm can be suppressed.
Generally, it can be stated that by acquiring the smoke situation by means of two different acquisition systems, namely by means of the smoke warning transmitter 4 and by means of the camera module 2, and by adjustment or comparison of the respective acquisition results, improved and safe acquisition of smoke situations can be achieved, and the probability of false alarms can be significantly reduced.
Accordingly, it is obvious to the person with technical skills in this field that the smoke alarm system according to the present invention has reduced installation requirements and space requirements, in particular in conditions of burn-out-proof spaces, as a result of minimisation of the number of devices and as a result of using for example a common network that is already in existence and a central computer. Furthermore, in this way for example weight savings can be achieved. Furthermore, synergies, for example through the further arrangement of humidity sensors and temperature sensors between fire smoke warning transmitters and camera modules based on more criteria, can better be used in an improved way. This is for example made possible by the identical installation situation of the smoke warning transmitter 4 and camera module 2. Furthermore, as a result of arranging the camera module 2 and the smoke warning transmitter 4 in a housing 10, all parameters and measured values acquired can be directly used for a local alarm statement. Furthermore, in most cases the view from above into the region to be monitored can make it possible to reduce the size of blind spots. Furthermore, covered regions, which are for example caused by edges or projections or by different loading situations, can in many cases be reduced in size.
As mentioned above, for example the network 14 can be a network which already exists for example in the aircraft. Furthermore, the computer unit 16 can for example be a central computer of an aircraft. In this case of course no common housing 30 (
In addition it should be pointed out that “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and “one” does not exclude a plural number. Furthermore, it should be pointed out that characteristics or steps which have been described with reference to one of the above embodiments can also be used in combination with other characteristics or steps of other embodiments described above. Reference characters in the claims are not to be interpreted as limitations.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 034 908.8 | Jul 2004 | DE | national |
60589285 | Jul 2004 | US | national |
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/589,285 filed Jul. 19, 2004 and of the German Patent Application No 10 2004 034 908.8 filed Jul. 19, 2004, the disclosures of which are herby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/07877 | 7/19/2005 | WO | 00 | 1/18/2007 |