The present disclosure relates to smoke detection, and in particular, sample point apparatuses for use in smoke detection systems.
Some smoke detection systems have a number of sample points spaced around a building that are connected via sampling tubes to a central analysis device that samples air taken from the sample points to determine if smoke or a fire is present in an area of the building. For example, such systems may be referred to as very early smoke detection apparatus (VESDA) systems.
Sample points typically have an apparatus body with a chamber formed therein. The chamber includes a first aperture, to allow air to pass between the area to be sampled and the chamber, and a second aperture to allow air to pass between the chamber and the tube, that is connected at its other end, to a central analysis device. The chamber also includes a one-way valve therein that allows inflow of air from the area to be sampled and restricts the outflow of air from the chamber.
As these systems draw air through the sample point to the central analysis device, the tube may become separated from the sampling chamber or may be damaged in such a way that air leaks into it from spaces other than that intended to be sampled. A condition of disconnection or leak is regarded a fault condition and must be detected and the fault reported to a monitoring system.
In order to check for this fault condition, the system attempts to force air out through the sampling chamber by applying positive pressure with respect to the chamber environment. If the tube is undamaged and is connected fully to the sampling chamber, the flow in the tube is restricted by the one-way valve in the sampling-point chamber. If the system measures the tube outflow to be above a threshold, or if the measured back pressure is low, then the system determines that either there is a leak or that the sampling-point chamber has become partially or fully disconnected from the tube and raises a fault notification to the monitoring device.
Further, in some implementations, an enclosure can be secured around a chamber of the sample point, as shown in
As discussed above, smoke detection sample points and systems are described herein. Embodiments of the present disclosure allow for the system to reliably test for leaks as described in more detail below.
For example, in one embodiment, a smoke detection sample point includes a body, a first enclosure, and a second enclosure; a chamber formed within the body, the chamber having a first aperture, to allow air to pass between an area to be sampled and the chamber, and a second aperture, to allow air to pass between the chamber and a space within the second enclosure. A valve is also positioned within the chamber.
The first enclosure surrounds the body, but allows the first aperture to pass air between the area to be sampled and the chamber and the second aperture to pass air between the chamber and the space within the second enclosure. The second enclosure surrounds the first enclosure and has a third aperture, the third aperture allows the air in the space within the second enclosure to pass between the second enclosure and a tube connected to the second enclosure. To accomplish this, the first enclosure may also have a first aperture positioned between the first aperture of the body and the area to be sampled and a second aperture positioned between the second aperture of the body and the second enclosure. This embodiment and others will be discussed in more detail with reference to the drawings provided with this disclosure.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof. The drawings show, by way of illustration, how one or more embodiments of the disclosure may be practiced.
These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those of ordinary skill in the art to practice one or more embodiments of this disclosure. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that process, computerized, and/or structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
As will be appreciated, elements shown in the various embodiments herein can be added, exchanged, combined, and/or eliminated so as to provide a number of additional embodiments of the present disclosure. The proportion and the relative scale of the elements provided in the figures are intended to illustrate the embodiments of the present disclosure and should not be taken in a limiting sense.
The figures herein follow a numbering convention in which the first digit or digits correspond to the drawing figure number and the remaining digits identify an element or component in the drawing. Similar elements or components between different figures may be identified by the use of similar digits. For example, 118 may reference element “18” in
As used herein, “a” or “a number of” something can refer to one or more such things. For example, “a number of apertures” can refer to one or more apertures. As used herein, “a plurality of” means two or more things.
Such a smoke detector sample point can, for example, be mounted in the ceiling of a building, such that the end portion of the body 102 having aperture 118 is in an area to be sampled (e.g., area below a ceiling) and the rest of the device is above or in the ceiling. As these sampling devices sometimes get fouled with debris, this device design allows for the sample point to be removed from the tube for inspection of the inside of the tube and the chamber within the body 102. This also allows for easy replacement of the sample point if it cannot be unfouled.
The first aperture 218 is positioned such that it is in an area where the air 206 is to be sampled. In operation, this air 206 will be drawn into the sample point via aperture 218 into chamber 204 and then it will be passed into a tube via aperture 205 where it will travel to the central analysis device.
To accomplish this, the second aperture 205 is sized for the insertion and affixation of the end of a tube having a similarly sized diameter to be frictionally fastened or fastened by some other mechanism, such as an adhesive material to the body 202. The aperture should be sized and/or affixed such that leakage of air between the tube and the body is minimized or eliminated.
When checking for leaks or performing maintenance operations, the flow of air may be reversed. In such instances, air flows into the chamber via second aperture 205, but closes the valve, thereby slowing or substantially stopping the air from flowing, as represented at 222.
To check for leaks, the central analysis device senses the restricted outward air flow for a given air pressure (due to the closure of the valve) and determines that there are no leaks, based on the air flow characteristics (flow versus pressure) measured being within an acceptable range indicating no leaks are present. If the outward air flow remains above a limit for a given pressure, or if the required pressure cannot be achieved, the central analysis device determines that a leak is present somewhere in either: the tube, the body 202, or the valve 210.
Such systems work well in most applications, but in some, such as prisons, hospitals, and schools, it may be desirable to position the entire body in or above the ceiling, for example, to avoid tampering by occupants of the space to be sampled. However, the problem with positioning the entire body in or above the ceiling is that the air drawn in to the sample point will likely be air from above the ceiling and not air from the area to be sampled, which renders the sample point ineffective.
The embodiment of
However, if a breach, such as hole 334, is present in the enclosure (e.g., through puncture due to tampering) then air 338 enters the enclosure and mixes with the air from the area to be sampled 306. This may distort the analysis of the area to be sampled.
Further, during a leak check, when air flow is reversed (as shown in
Embodiments of the present disclosure overcome this leak detection issue as discussed in more detail below.
In
In an embodiment such as
The body 402 includes a chamber 404 formed within the body, the chamber has a first aperture 418, to allow air to pass between an area to be sampled 406 and the chamber 404, and a second aperture 405, to allow air to pass between the chamber 404 and a space within a second enclosure 408. The chamber 404 also includes a valve 410 positioned therein.
The first enclosure 412 surrounds the body 402, but allows the first aperture 418 to pass air between the area to be sampled 406 and the chamber 404. The second aperture 405 passes air between the chamber 404 and the space within the second enclosure 408.
The second enclosure 413 surrounds the first enclosure 412 and has a third aperture 407. The third aperture 407 allows the air in the space within the second enclosure 408 to pass between the second enclosure and a tube 414 (illustrated at 420). The tube 414 connected to the second enclosure at a first end of the tube wherein the end of the tube 414 is inserted into the third aperture 407 and the second end of the tube is connected to a central analysis device.
As mentioned above, the chamber 404 includes a valve 410 and when an outflow of air is applied to the valve, the valve restricts movement of air through the chamber. The valve can be a one-way valve with a flap that opens and closes to allow more or less air to enter or exit the chamber through the first aperture 418. This valve can be used in a process to check the system for leaks as will be discussed in more detail below.
In some embodiments, the first aperture 416 in the first enclosure 412 can be comprised of a plurality of smaller apertures (as illustrated in
Alternatively, this arrangement can be provided by placing a mesh material over the first aperture. Such an arrangement can provide a protective barrier to reduce blockage of the sample point by objects larger than those that can fit through the smaller apertures, while allowing air to pass through the aperture between the area to be sample and the chamber.
As discussed above and illustrated in the embodiment of
Alternatively, the body can be fixedly attached to the nozzle, for example, in unitary designs, where replacement of the sample point would include replacement of a unit including the body and combination of one or both of the first and second enclosures.
The air is then drawn out of the chamber 404 and into an area 408 within the second enclosure 413 (e.g., between the materials forming the first and second enclosures). As used herein, the area 408 is the entire space between the first enclosure and the second enclosure.
The air 420 is, further, drawn from the area 408 in the second enclosure into the tube 414 and to the central analysis device. To accomplish this, the central analysis device includes a reversible pump that draws air from the sample point to the central analysis device or reverses to push air to the sample point, for cleaning and leak checking, for example.
In order to test to see if the system needs to be cleaned, the central analysis device can compare air pressure values of the air currently being drawn through the tube 414 and a threshold valve stored in memory, either on the central analysis device or stored remotely. Although not shown in the drawings, an example of one suitable central analysis device is the central detector unit of the VESDA E VEA system manufactured by Honeywell.
Specifically,
In this example, a leak test is being performed (as indicated by the outflow of air 524 from tube 514 into the area 508 within the second enclosure 513). The air also is pushed into the chamber 504 of the body 502 through the second aperture in the body and second aperture in the first enclosure 512 and closes the valve 510. Because the valve 510 is in the closed position, the pressure in the system should be higher, as the air flow out of the first aperture 518 of the body is restricted.
However, the air 528, instead, flows out of the breach 530, and thereby, the pressure may not rise above the threshold level or the air flow exceeds an expected value when the central analysis device tests the system. This would indicate to the central analysis device that there is a breach in the system.
In this example, a leak test is, again, being performed (as indicated by the outflow of air 624 from tube 614 into the area 608 within the second enclosure 613. Again, in this example, because the valve 610 is in the closed position, the pressure in the system should be higher, as the air flow out of the first aperture 618 of the body is restricted.
Instead, the air 632 flows through the breach 630, and thereby, the pressure may not rise above the threshold level when the central analysis device compares the air pressures. This would, also, indicate to the central analysis device that there is a breach in the system.
As can be understood from the above discussion, the embodiments of the present disclosure provide significant benefits with regard to leak detection for smoke detection systems using sample points as well as providing a protective type enclosure that is useful in some applications. These benefits include earlier, more accurate smoke detection, which can save property and, in some cases, the lives of the occupants of the area being sampled, among other benefits.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same techniques can be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments of the disclosure.
It is to be understood that the above description has been made in an illustrative fashion and not a restrictive one. Combination of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
The scope of the various embodiments of the disclosure includes any other applications in which the above structures and methods are used. Therefore, the scope of various embodiments of the disclosure should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
In the foregoing Detailed Description, various features are grouped together in example embodiments illustrated in the figures for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the embodiments of the disclosure require more features than are expressly recited in each claim.
Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3765247 | Riggs | Oct 1973 | A |
3767925 | Foley, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3980997 | Berns | Sep 1976 | A |
4155653 | San Miguel | May 1979 | A |
4194191 | Salem | Mar 1980 | A |
4238679 | Macmillan | Dec 1980 | A |
4294165 | Bergdahl | Oct 1981 | A |
4361763 | Bryant | Nov 1982 | A |
4531453 | Warman | Jul 1985 | A |
4758827 | Powers | Jul 1988 | A |
4920263 | Fimian | Apr 1990 | A |
5021250 | Ferguson | Jun 1991 | A |
5103212 | Notarianni | Apr 1992 | A |
5501234 | Hyre | Mar 1996 | A |
5665924 | Cole | Sep 1997 | A |
8528385 | Raghavendra | Sep 2013 | B2 |
10161837 | Ajay | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20030033890 | Rodgers | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050087027 | Widmer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050183575 | Fox | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070137318 | Desrochers | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168140 | Knox | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090002182 | Knox | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090237259 | Yokota | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090293581 | Nadin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100199785 | Timmis | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206043 | Tewarson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100328082 | Danz | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20140231531 | van der Donk | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150096389 | Knox | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150310717 | Al-Farra | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160238495 | Joseph | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170045415 | Williamson | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180149559 | Williamson | May 2018 | A1 |
20180149581 | Lo | May 2018 | A1 |
20190159830 | Horner | May 2019 | A1 |
20190201593 | Shelton, IV | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200193791 | Gonzales | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20210165925 | Birnkrant | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210174659 | Hartwig | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210270789 | Desjardins | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103646490 | Mar 2014 | CN |
2015071409 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
VESDA-E VEA Sampling Points, xtrails, www.xtralis.com, 2021, 2 pages (Year: 2021). |
Determining the Effectiveness, Limitations and Operator Response for Very Early Warning Fire Detection Systems in Nuclear Facilities, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S.NRC), Dec. 2016, 485 pages (Year: 2016). |
A novel box for aerosol and droplet guarding and evacuation in respiratory infection (BADGER) for COVID-19 and future outbreaks, Scientific Reports, www.nature.com/scientificreports, 2021, 12 pages (Year: 2021). |
European Extended Search Report for related European Application No. 21197821.8, dated Feb. 15, 2022 (9 pgs). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220099644 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |