The present invention relates generally to smoke detectors. More particularly, the present invention relates to a smoke detector with a double optical chamber.
Point smoke detectors that use scattered light, that is, photoelectric detectors are known in the art. For example, known photoelectric detectors include a sensing chamber into which smoke enters, an optical system to generate a flash of light and detect the light scattered by smoke particulate, and an electronic system to process and transmit a signal proportional to the smoke. The optical system includes an emitter and receiver that are located in such a way so that a high amount of light projected by the emitter is collected by the receiver only in the presence of smoke when the smoke particles scatter the light.
In known photoelectric detectors, smoke detection based on optical scattering is affected by inaccuracy sources, other than smoke, that cause the light to scatter. For example, known inaccuracy sources include, but are not limited to, (1) dust accumulation on sensing chamber surfaces that cause a slow output signal drift and an increase in smoke sensitivity, (2) small objects or insects that settle on the walls of the sensing chamber and that cause quick output signal variations and false alarms, (3) moisture and steam effects that cause unwanted deviations of light radiation, false alarms and signal faults, and (4) temperature variations that cause emitter and receiver characteristic changes.
Although a high amount of light projected by the emitter is collected by the receiver only in the presence of smoke, a small amount of the light projected by the emitter is also collected by the receiver even in the absence of smoke. In this manner, a low level output signal, or a clean air value, is generated. It is known to use the clean air value to monitor the correct operating conditions of the emitter and receiver and to easily and quickly calibrate the detector in a factory.
The clean air value of an output signal is typically generated by light from the emitter being reflected multiple times within the sensing chamber. Accordingly, the clean air value typically has depended on the geometrical configuration, roughness, and color of the sensing chamber. However, when the light reflects multiple times within the sensing chamber, the clean air value of the output signal is more sensitive to the inaccuracy sources described above so unwanted signal variations, false alarms, and sensitivity variations occur more easily.
The above-identified disadvantages can be minimized when a sensing chamber is designed so that the clean air signal is zero. However, such designs introduce more costs to calibrate detectors.
Accordingly, some photoelectric detectors have been designed to include two optical chambers, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,968,379, U.S. Pat. No. 7,872,815, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,870,394 disclose examples of such detectors. However, each of these detectors includes a second receiver, for example, a reference receiver, in addition to the smoke receiver, that is illuminated by part of the emitter radiation in a compensating, or reference, chamber. The two receivers are connected in a bridge circuit and the electrical signal output from the bridge is used to generate an alarm signal. Accordingly, the smoke receiver is not directly monitored. Furthermore, because two receivers are required, these types of detectors require more opto-electronic and electronic components and therefore, are more expensive to manufacture and implement.
The goal of any double chamber scheme is to reduce the clean air signal drift due to dust and dirt accumulating during the detector lifetime. However, it is preferred that any double chamber scheme includes an effective configuration that is low cost to manufacture and implement. This is particularly so in two cases: (1) when a smoke detector is in an environment where a standard photoelectric smoke detector gets dirty quickly, and (2) when a smoke detector includes a high sensitivity or high gain photoelectric detector.
In view of the above, there is a continuing, ongoing need for a smoke detector with an improved double optical chamber.
While this invention is susceptible of an embodiment in many different forms, there are shown in the drawings and will be described herein in detail specific embodiments thereof with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention. It is not intended to limit the invention to the specific illustrated embodiments.
Embodiments disclosed herein can include a smoke detector with an improved double optical chamber. In accordance with disclosed embodiments, the double optical chamber as disclosed herein can be assembled and included in any smoke detector that implements photoelectric detection. Advantageously, the double optical chamber disclosed herein can reduce the need for maintenance of standard photoelectric detectors, especially in dusty environments or in environments polluted by insects, while also providing a simple and cost-effective opto-mechanical configuration and implementation for high sensitivity photoelectric detectors and such detectors in aspirating systems. Furthermore, the double optical chamber disclosed herein can reduce clean air drift due to dust, humidity, and other small objects entering the smoke chamber, while easily and quickly calibrating and monitoring the correct operation of emitter and receiver of the detector.
In some embodiments, the double optical chamber disclosed herein can include two different chambers: a smoke chamber and a monitoring chamber. Both chambers can be illuminated by the same emitter, and light can be collected by the same receiver so that only two opto-electronic devices are needed to implement the double optical chamber. Such an implementation can keep the cost of the configuration low.
In the smoke chamber, light from the emitter can be scattered by smoke particles onto the receiver, thereby generating an output signal. The geometrical configuration of the smoke chamber can be such that, using only this chamber, a zero clean air value can be obtained. Accordingly, the contribution to signal drift due to dust and humidity can be minimized, thereby reducing maintenance needs. In some embodiments, the smoke chamber disclosed herein can reduce or eliminate multiple reflections within the smoke chamber. Advantageously, this results in a reduction of false alarms and in a very low drift due to progressive chamber dirtiness, for example, from dust accumulation, that can cause output signal saturation.
The monitoring chamber may not have access from outside of the smoke detector. Accordingly, in some embodiments, smoke, dust, and other objects cannot enter the monitoring chamber. However, in the monitoring chamber, a sufficient amount of light from the emitter can be projected onto the receiver to obtain a significant and useful clean air value that can be used to calibrate the detector and monitor, in a reliable and cost effective way, the correct operation of the emitter and the receiver during the lifetime of the detector. Indeed, because the above-identified noise sources can be kept out of the monitoring chamber, in some embodiments, the clean air value is not affected by these noises.
In some embodiments, the double optical chamber disclosed herein can include a light splitter optical block, a chamber cover, and a chamber base, and these three parts can form the smoke and monitoring chambers as described above and herein. For example, the smoke chamber, into which smoke can enter, can be delimited, at the top, by the chamber cover and, at the bottom, by the light splitter optical block and the chamber base. The monitoring chamber, into which smoke cannot enter and does not have access from outside of the detector, can be delimited, at the top, by the light splitter optical block and the chamber base and, at the bottom, by a printed circuit board (PCB).
The light splitter optical block as disclosed herein can be both a light splitter and a light collector. For example, the optical block can divide the light radiation from the emitter into two beams: a sensing beam and a monitoring beam. In some embodiments, the sensing beam can be more intense than the monitoring beam. The sensing beam can be projected into the smoke chamber to sense smoke during fire. For example, this radiation can come from the main radiation cone of the emitter, and light scattered by smoke particles in the smoke chamber can be collected by the main view cone of the receiver. Conversely, the monitoring beam can be projected into the monitoring chamber to calibrate the detector and monitor the correct operation of the emitter and detector. For example, this radiation can come from the secondary lobes of the emitter through a first hole in the bottom surface of an emitter housing formed in the optical block. A similar and corresponding second hole can be disposed in a receiver housing formed in the optical block for capturing light reflected in the monitoring chamber, and the light collected by the receiver from the monitoring chamber can be used to generate the non-zero clean air value.
In some embodiments, the first hole in the emitter housing and the second hole in the receiver housing can be small and circular, rectangular, or any other shape as would be desired by one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, in circular embodiments, each of the holes can have a diameter between 1.5 mm and 3 mm, for example, on the order of 2 mm. In square or rectangular embodiments, each of the holes can have an area between 2 mm2 and 8 mm2. In some embodiments, the first and second holes can be identical or can have different sizes or shapes. However, in some embodiments, the size of each of the holes can be related to the emitter light flux, the receiver sensitivity, and the reflectivity surfaces of the monitoring chamber.
In some embodiments, the area and placement of the first and second holes can be critical to proper operation of the optical double chamber. For example, in some embodiments, each of the holes can be placed below their respective optical device in such a way as to be fully covered by the respective optical device and so that the monitoring chamber remains closed. Furthermore, in some embodiments, each of the holes can be wide enough to collect a sufficient, proper, and necessary amount of radiation.
As described above, the first hole—the emitter hole—can capture radiation from the emitter and illuminate the monitoring chamber. The second hole—the receiver hole—can collect radiation from the monitoring chamber and illuminate the receiver, which can generate, with a related current amplifier, a suitable clean air value. For example, in known detectors that include a zero clean air chamber cover, operation with a known optical block can result in a clean air value on the order of 40 mV. However, in detectors that include a zero clean air chamber cover, operation with the light splitter optical block as disclosed herein can result in a clean air value on the order of 855 mV. From this illustrative example, it can be understood that the embodiments disclosed herein advantageously result in an improved clean air value.
It is to be understood that the double optical chamber as disclosed herein can be included in known and existing smoke detectors. For example, such smoke detectors can be retrofitted to include the double optical chamber disclosed herein, but without further modification of the detector's firmware and hardware. Indeed, in some embodiments, the double optical chamber disclosed herein can employ the same optical and electronic devices of known smoke detectors. For example, a detector that includes the double optical chamber disclosed herein can be calibrated as is known in the art except that the clean air value can be generated from radiation received only from the closed monitoring chamber of the disclosed double optical chamber.
In some embodiments, the chamber cover and the chamber base as disclosed herein can include the chamber cover and the chamber base as disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/968,136 titled “Aspirated Smoke Detector With Improved Optical Chamber”. U.S. application Ser. No. 14/968,136 is assigned to the assignee hereof and is hereby incorporated by reference. For example,
In some embodiments, the light splitter optical block as disclosed herein can include the optical block as disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 14/315,646 titled “Detector With Optical Block” and in U.S. application Ser. No. 29/495,060 titled “Optical Block”. Each of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/315,646 and U.S. application Ser. No. 29/495,060 is assigned to the assignee hereof and is hereby incorporated by reference. For example, the optical block as disclosed herein can include the same components and materials, and be manufacturing with the same process, as disclosed in either of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/315,646 and U.S. application Ser. No. 29/495,060. However, the optical block disclosed herein can be modified to include the first and second emitter and receiver holes as described herein. For example, the holes in the optical block can be manufactured and created by drilling.
The chamber cover, chamber base, and optical block as disclosed herein can be arranged relative to one another as shown in the side, cross-sectional view of the double optical chamber 500 seen in
For example,
Although a few embodiments have been described in detail above, other modifications are possible. For example, the logic flows described above do not require the particular order described, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. Other steps may be provided, or steps may be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components may be added to, or removed from, the described systems. Other embodiments may be within the scope of the invention.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific system or method described herein is intended or should be inferred. It is, of course, intended to cover all such modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention.