Heretofore, cigarettes with high levels of ventilation have usually had unacceptably low levels of resistance to draw (RTD) unless some counter measure was in place to make-up the shortfall in RTD. In the past, high density cellulose acetate filter segments were used to address the shortfall. However, such filtered segments tended to reduce tar delivery (FTC) with little or no effect upon gas phase components of mainstream tobacco smoke, such as carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxide (NO). This solution tended to worsen the CO to tar (FTC) ratios in lower delivery (FTC tar) cigarettes.
Ventilation has a desirable attribute in that, when operating alone, it will reduce both the particulate phase and the gas phase constituencies of mainstream smoke. Highly ventilated cigarettes however have drawbacks in RTD as previously discussed.
Presently disclosed embodiments provide the benefit of a highly ventilated smoking article with desired amounts of resistance to draw and/or provisions for facilitating high speed cigarette manufacturing utilizing high speed filter rod and cigarette making equipment.
Referring to
A ventilating zone 140 is established with a first row (and optionally second and possibly third rows) of ventilation holes through the tipping paper 116. In the preferred embodiment, the holes 134 provided about the circumference of the flow restricting filter segment 126 are overlapped by (superposed by) at least some of the ventilation holes at the ventilating zone 140 so that air may be drawn through the ventilation holes at zone 140 and through the flow restricting filter segment and into cavity 146 defined between the flow restriction 130 and the mouthpiece filter segment 122.
Preferably the ventilating zone 140 is located near or adjacent to the restriction 130 and spaced from the mouthpiece filter 122 so that air drawn through the ventilation zone 140 is allowed to mix with the mainstream smoke before arriving at the mouthpiece filter 122.
Preferably, the distance between the ventilation zone 140 and the mouthpiece filter 122 is at least 5 mm or in the range of 5-12 mm.
Preferably, the ventilation zone 140 and the holes 134 in the flow restricting filter segment 126 achieve a ventilation level of the smoking article of at least 25% and more preferably at least 50% to 90%.
Referring now also to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Furthermore, the embodiment of
Referring now to
In this embodiment, the ventilation zone 140 comprises a plurality of ventilation holes which extend through the tipping paper 116 and optionally through the tubular filter segment 148. If the tubular filter segment 148 is constructed of paper, it is preferred that the ventilation holes extend through the tubular segment 148. In either case, this arrangement facilitates the use of online laser perforation techniques to provide ventilation holes during the manufacture of the smoking article 110. Other techniques may be used to create the ventilation zone 140 such as using off-line, pre-perforated tipping paper, mechanical perforation, electrostatic perforation and other techniques.
Referring now to
Referring now to
A cigarette having an upstream restrictor 130 with downstream ventilation 140, as described herein, can provide various effects during smoking. For example, as flow rate of a puff increases, pressure drop at the restrictor increases more rapidly compared to a conventional CA filter. Thus, the restrictor works in this configuration as a limiter on the extent to which a smoker may attempt to draw harder on a smoking article during a puff. In addition, having the ventilation zone 140 downstream of the restrictor orifice 130 decouples their respective functionalities (ventilation levels and RTD, respectively) such that a cigarette designer may adjust RTD by changing the size of the restrictor orifice 130 essentially without impacting ventilation levels already established at the ventilation zone 140 and vice versa.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In manufacturing embodiments having a filter segment 119, a two-up mouthpiece filter segment 122 is first disposed at the central location of the two-up tube 148′ and the restrictor plugs 126 are set in place. Thereafter, one-up segments 118 and then the one-up carbon on tow segment 119 are plunged or otherwise placed on opposite sides adjacent the restrictor plugs.
Referring to
The ventilation zone 140 is established with a first row (and optionally second and possibly third rows) of ventilation holes through the tipping paper 116 and filter tube 148′. Accordingly, air is preferably drawn through the ventilation holes of ventilation zone 140 and into the cavity 146 defined between the flow restriction 130 and the mouthpiece filter segment 122.
Preferably the ventilation zone 140 is located near or adjacent to the flow restriction 130 and spaced from the mouthpiece filter 122 so that air drawn through the ventilation zone 140 is allowed to mix with the mainstream smoke before arriving at the mouthpiece filter 122. Preferably, the distance between the ventilation zone 140 and the mouthpiece filter 122 is at least 5 mm or in the range of 5-20 mm. By such arrangement, impaction of mainstream smoke at the mouthpiece filter 122 is minimized.
Preferably, the ventilation zone 140 achieves a ventilation level of the smoking article of at least 25% and more preferably at least 50% to 90%, e.g., 60%, 70%, or 80%.
The restrictor disc 126 may comprise an impermeable partition (transverse wall) having one or more orifices therein, that establishes the flow restriction 130, with the restriction specifically in the form of an orifice of reduced diameter. If desired, the partition can be perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the smoking article or frustoconical and convergent either into or away from the direction of flow of mainstream smoke passing therethrough. Furthermore, the restrictor disc 126 may be configured to provide end to end symmetry. A filter component having end to end symmetry facilitates high speed filter rod making in that the component works the same whether or not the rod making machine orients one end of the component first or reverses it.
A restrictor disc 126 having end to end symmetry has tubular body portions of equal length on opposite sides of a transverse wall (partition). By such arrangement manufacture of the filter is facilitated by the end to end symmetry of the restrictor disc 126.
Optionally, a zone of ventilation may be located upstream of the flow restriction 130 in addition to ventilation zone 140 as provided above.
Manufacture of the smoking articles 110 in accordance with the present disclosure may be facilitated with the use of pre-perforated tipping paper.
Preferably the flow restriction 130 is sized to contribute sufficient pressure drop such that the smoking article 110 presents a resistance to draw of at least 40 mm water or greater, preferably in the range of 50-100 mm water. Preferably, the partition (transverse wall) has a diameter of approximately 7.0 to 8.0 mm and more preferably approximately 7.4 to 7.8 mm wherein the partition preferably has one or optionally, more than one orifice of a diameter of about 0.5 mm to about 1.0 mm and more preferably about 0.5 to 0.7 mm. Since the pressure drop of the restrictor component depends on the open area, multiple orifices can also be used. For example, in one embodiment there are two orifices in the partition of 0.5 mm diameter each.
The restrictor disc 126 may be constructed of paper, a plastic, polymer or a metal and more preferably made of a paper product or a biodegradable plastic/polymer or other suitable material having biodegradability properties. However, in the case of plastic being used, the restrictor disc 26, in the embodiments shown in FIGS. 6 and 13-17, is small and the non-biodegradable content of the filter is minimized.
Preferably, the flow restriction 130 and the mouthpiece filter 122 are spaced apart sufficiently to reduce impaction of particulate smoke components upon the upstream face of the mouthpiece filter 122. Preferably, the flow restriction 130 is spaced approximately 4 mm to 20 mm from the mouthpiece filter 122, more preferably approximately 6 to 10 mm.
It is to be appreciated that the filter preferably may be constructed from simple combining techniques typically used in the industry for manufacturing cigarettes at high speeds. Additionally each embodiment includes tubular support about the cavity 146 so as to provide desired firmness throughout length of the filter 114. Furthermore, the embodiments provide the necessary amount of resistance to draw while maintaining the desired degree of high ventilation throughout the puff count. The latter attribute is achieved by placement of the ventilation zone 140 downstream of the flow restriction 130. Furthermore, placing the ventilation along cavity 146 assures mixing of air drawn into the filter 114 through the ventilation zone 140 with mainstream smoke drawn from the tobacco rod 112. In one tested embodiment, uniform stain patterns appeared at the buccal end of the mouthpiece filter 122, which is indicative of good mixing.
During smoking of a cigarette constructed in accordance with the present disclosure, a consistent degree of ventilation (e.g., 50 to 90%, preferably about 70%) is preferably maintained throughout the puff count as shown in
In contrast, when ventilation holes are placed upstream of the flow restriction 130, ventilation tends to drop as smoking progresses through the puff count as shown in
Referring now to
In a preferred embodiment, a smoking article 10 includes a flow restricting filter segment 26 received in an air transmissive tubular segment 30. During manufacturing operations, a T-restrictor insert 18 is plunged into the upstream end portion of the tubular segment 30.
In this embodiment, the tubular segment 30 is constructed from cellulose acetate tow (sometimes referred to as a hollow acetate tube or HAT) and the T-restrictor insert 18 includes a transverse disc shaped wall 45 with one or more openings 60 therein and a longitudinal tubular section 32 extending therefrom having a length of about 3 mm to about 10 mm, more preferably about 3 mm to about 7 mm in length. The T-insert includes an outer rim 33, which is wider than the tubular section 32 such that the insert 18 looks T-shaped in a side view.
In an embodiment, a central cavity 46 within the filter 14 is defined at least in part by the tubular segment 30 and optionally, in part by the space enclosed by the tubular section 32 of the restrictor insert 18. Preferably, a ventilation zone 40 communicates with the cavity 46 at a location downstream of the restrictor insert 18. The tubular segment 30 is preferably constructed from a hollow acetate tube (HAT) and is preferably air permeable (low density) so that ventilation air may be drawn through ventilation holes 75 into the cavity 46 during a puff. Other low density, low filtration materials can also be used to construct the tubular segment 30.
During a puff, mainstream smoke is drawn through an orifice 60, illustrated in
In a preferred embodiment, the ventilation zone 40 comprises a plurality of ventilation holes 75 arranged in one or more circumferential rows, which extend through the tipping paper 16 and optionally/partially into or through the tubular segment 30. This arrangement facilitates the use of off-line laser perforation techniques to provide ventilation holes 75. Other techniques may be used to create the ventilation zone 40 such as using on-line, laser perforation, mechanical pin perforation techniques, electrostatic perforation and other techniques.
The ventilation holes 75 in the tipping paper 16 allow atmospheric air to be drawn into the ventilation zone 40, through the tubular segment 30, and into the cavity 46. When a hollow acetate tube forms at least part of the tubular segment 30, perforations need not be made in the tubular filter segment 30 because the material is air permeable.
In a preferred embodiment, the ventilation zone 40 and the tubular filter segment 30 achieve a ventilation level of the smoking article of at least about 25% and more preferably at least about 50% to about 90%.
Referring now to
In a preferred embodiment, the elongated portion 32 of the T-restrictor 18 forms a channel with dimensions of about 3 mm to about 9 mm in diameter and about 7 mm to about 10 mm in length. Preferably, the tubular portion 32 fits snuggly inside the tubular segment 30, which is preferably a hollow acetate tube. The transverse wall 45 is preferably sized to cover a substantial portion of the end of the hollow acetate tube once the tubular portion 32 has been inserted therein.
Referring now to
For ease of manufacturing on high speed filter rod making equipment, the outer diameter of the rim 33 is less than that of the original diameter of the tubular segment 30 prior to filter rod making operations. Preferably, the diameter of the rim 33 is smaller than the pre-determined diameter of the cigarette to be made. For example, for a cigarette having a circumference of 24.1 mm, the circumference of the rim 33 is preferably 1 to 10% smaller, e.g., approximately 23.9 mm or less in the example. As is typically done in established filter rod making techniques, the original diameter or the HAT segment 30 is slightly oversized so that it may be uniformly compressed into the desired diameter (e.g. 24.1 mm), and held in place by the plug wrap during filter making operations. Because the rim 33 is of lesser diameter, the T-restrictor insert 18 passes through the garniture of a filter rod making machine without snagging.
Preferably, the T-restrictor insert 18 is a single piece that is injection molded. The T-restrictor insert 18 is preferably made of a plastic, metal, cellulosic material, and/or composite of a plastic and starch. Suitable plastics include, without limitation, polypropylene, polyethylene, polystyrene, nylon, polysulfone, polyester, polyurethane, and combinations thereof.
Referring now to
Similarly, continuous cellulose acetate, low particulate efficiency, filter rods are produced and cut into a plurality of CA 6-up/84 mm long rods, which are fed or placed into a second hopper 507 of the DAPTC combiner. During combining operations the 6-up rods are further cut and sorted into 2-up/14 mm segments (corresponding to a 2-up version of the upstream filter segment 24 of
At the downstream travel portion of the feed belt 505 a rotating spacer drum 508 establishes a continuous, closed-up procession 515 of the alternating 2-up restrictor assemblies and 2-up CA segments in mutually abutting, end to end relation with one after another. Downstream of the rotating spacer drum 508, the procession is transferred onto a ribbon of plug wrap 513. A garniture belt 509 draws both the procession 515 and the plug wrap 513 through a garniture 511 whereat the plug wrap 513 is wrapped about the procession of plugs 515 so as to form a continuous filter rod 521. Preferably one or more glue guns 517 apply a desired pattern of glue continuously and/or at spaced locations along the ribbon of plug wrap 513 to retain filter rod 521 in its final form. Again, because the rims 33 of the T-restrictor inserts 18 are undersized relative to the target diameter of the filter rod 521, they pass through the garniture 511 and remain set in place at spaced location along the rod 521.
Downstream of the garniture 511 a cutter 517 severs the continuous rod 521 so as to repetitively form a 6-up restrictor/upstream segment assembly (rod) 519. The 6-up rod 519 preferably comprises the following segments from one end to the other: a 1-up/7 mm CA segment at one end of the rod 521; a first 26 mm/2-up restrictor assembly segment; a 14 mm/2-up CA segment; a second 26 mm/2-up restrictor assembly segment; a second 14 mm/2-up CA segment; a third 26 mm/2-up restrictor assembly segment; and a second, 1-up/7 mm at the opposite end of the rod. The 6-up rods 519 are then fed or placed into a first hopper 170 of a dual hopper max tipping machine or a machine of similar capabilities.
Referring now to
The 2-up plugs 622 are preferably constructed from similar cutting, grading and aligning operations on 6-up 84 mm long filter rods at drums 242, 244 and 246 of the DHMAX represented in
Referring back to operations at 238, the plugs are brought together at drum 250 to form a complete 2-up filter structures 525, which are then fed in between pairs of spaced apart tobacco rods 527, as illustrated in
Hollow acetate filter plugs may be produced in continuous fashion from a tubular filter rod maker such as the maker as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,637,447 to Berger et al. Subsequent combining and tipping operations may be executed on a Molins double-action plug-tube combiner (“DATPC”). Preferably, the tobacco rods are constructed on a conventional cigarette rod making machine (such as a Molins Mark 9 tobacco rod maker) wherein cut filler (preferably blended) is air formed into a continuous rod of tobacco on a traveling belt and enwrapped with a continuous ribbon of plug wrap which is then glued along its longitudinal seam and sealed with adhesive.
The output of the tobacco rod maker is then cut and delivered to a tipping machine such as a Hauni Dual Hopper Max that has been modified to execute the combining and tipping operations described herein.
In another embodiment, as illustrated in
Preferably, as seen in
In an embodiment, flavorants or colorants can be added to the material surrounding the spiral channel 80. Examples of flavorants include licorice, sugar, isosweet, cocoa, lavender, cinnamon, cardamom, apium graveolens, fenugreek, cascarilla, sandalwood, bergamot, geranium, honey essence, rose oil, vanilla, lemon oil, orange oil, mint oils, cassia, caraway, cognac, jasmine, chamomile, menthol, cassia, sage, spearmint, ginger, coriander, coffee and the like.
In this embodiment, smoke is drawn through the channel 80 during a puff and the channel 80 acts as a flow restrictor. Depending on the cross-section and length of the channel 80, a desired pressure drop across the segment can be achieved.
The channel 80 leads to a cavity 46 within the filter 14 that is defined at least in part by a tubular segment 30, such as a cellulosic tube extending from end to end of filter 14. A ventilation zone 40 is introduced downstream of the spiral channel 80. Perforations in the tipping paper 16 and the cylindrical tubular filter segment 30 provide for ventilation and the tubular segment 30 may optionally be constructed of fibers so as to be air-permeable.
The spiral flow channel 80 can be finely tuned to selectively allow only a particular range or size of smoke, for example, semi-volatile enriched smoke aerosol particles, to pass to the cavity 46. Both gas phase and particulate phase smoke can be reduced, but preferably, the flavor rich semi-volatiles are allowed to remain in the smoke. When a carbon paper or sheet material containing adsorbents is wrapped around the spiral segment, the gas phase components of the smoke being drawn through the filter channel may diffuse out or the filter and/or contact the paper longer resulting in capture of targeted constituents. The heavy or large aerosol particles experiencing centrifugation or impaction action can also be trapped. The materials, for example, paper foam- or starch based plastics, used to form the segment 26′ can be chosen or treated to enhance a particular filtration selectivity or to deliver flavor. For example, the material can be treated with a waxy or oil material to enhance removal of non-polar component or treated with glycerin to enhance removal of polar compounds.
Referring still to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring now to
When manufacturing the restrictor of
As shown in Table 2, the filter achieves significant smoke constituent reductions without the taste penalty associated by Americans with carbon-filters.
It will be understood that the foregoing description is of the preferred embodiments, and is, therefore, merely representative of the article and methods of manufacturing the same. It can be appreciated that variations and modifications of the different embodiments in light of the above teachings will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, various filters are described as being constructed of cellulose acetate tow, whereas other materials, such as filter paper, carbon paper, polypropylene, and other similar materials could be used instead. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the articles and methods as set forth in the attached claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. provisional Application No. 60/786,352, filed on Mar. 28, 2006, U.S. provisional Application No. 60/858,407, filed Nov. 13, 2006, and U.S. provisional Application No. 60/905,833, filed Mar. 9, 2007, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2511898 | Brothers | Jun 1950 | A |
2547119 | Henderson | Apr 1951 | A |
2592553 | Frankenburg et al. | Apr 1952 | A |
2592554 | Frankenburg | Apr 1952 | A |
2598680 | Frankenburg | Jun 1952 | A |
2764513 | Brothers | Sep 1956 | A |
2769734 | Bandel | Nov 1956 | A |
2954772 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954778 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954783 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954786 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
3098492 | Wurzburg et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3234949 | White et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3236244 | Irby, Jr. et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3255760 | Selke | Jun 1966 | A |
3283762 | Kissel | Nov 1966 | A |
3292635 | Kolodny | Dec 1966 | A |
3318312 | Curtis, Jr. | May 1967 | A |
3323525 | Miller | Jun 1967 | A |
3356094 | Ellis et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3389705 | Levavi | Jun 1968 | A |
3395713 | Ent-Keller | Aug 1968 | A |
3441028 | Wall | Apr 1969 | A |
3457927 | Siragusa | Jul 1969 | A |
3496945 | Tomkin | Feb 1970 | A |
3504677 | Doppelt | Apr 1970 | A |
3581748 | Cameron | Jun 1971 | A |
3599646 | Berger et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3630210 | Haslam | Dec 1971 | A |
3637447 | Berger et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3638661 | Pinkham | Feb 1972 | A |
3646941 | Doppelt | Mar 1972 | A |
3648712 | Patterson | Mar 1972 | A |
3685522 | Kleinhans | Aug 1972 | A |
3738375 | Doumas | Jun 1973 | A |
3756249 | Selke et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3759270 | Wright | Sep 1973 | A |
3860011 | Norman | Jan 1975 | A |
3877470 | Jewett et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3931824 | Miano et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3968804 | Kelly et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3986515 | Egri | Oct 1976 | A |
4016887 | Uroshevich | Apr 1977 | A |
4022222 | Berger | May 1977 | A |
4038994 | Aikman | Aug 1977 | A |
4091821 | Scorzo | May 1978 | A |
4119105 | Owens, Jr. | Oct 1978 | A |
4120310 | Lee et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4135523 | Luke et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4158364 | Ligeti | Jun 1979 | A |
4182349 | Selke | Jan 1980 | A |
4186756 | Takemoto et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4197863 | Clayton et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4256122 | Johnson | Mar 1981 | A |
4256126 | Seligman et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4273141 | Jan Van Tilburg | Jun 1981 | A |
4292983 | Mensik | Oct 1981 | A |
4340072 | Bolt et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4341228 | Keritsis et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4343319 | Cantrell | Aug 1982 | A |
4357950 | Berger | Nov 1982 | A |
4380241 | Horsewell | Apr 1983 | A |
4386618 | Cantrell | Jun 1983 | A |
4421126 | Gellatly | Dec 1983 | A |
4460001 | Browne et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4469112 | Browne et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4506683 | Cantrell et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508525 | Berger | Apr 1985 | A |
4515170 | Cantrell et al. | May 1985 | A |
4542755 | Selke et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4559955 | Brockway et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4564030 | Jessup et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4574820 | Pinkerton et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4585015 | Silberstein | Apr 1986 | A |
4617946 | Keith | Oct 1986 | A |
4620553 | Bale et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4622982 | Gaisch et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4637409 | Berger | Jan 1987 | A |
4646762 | Riehl et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4649944 | Houck, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4660579 | Horsewell et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4677992 | Bliznak | Jul 1987 | A |
4687008 | Houck, Jr. et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4700726 | Townsend et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702263 | Strydom | Oct 1987 | A |
4732168 | Resce et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4754766 | Luke et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4784632 | Berger | Nov 1988 | A |
4791943 | Kupper et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4793365 | Sensabaugh et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4867182 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4896682 | Liew | Jan 1990 | A |
4924886 | Litzinger | May 1990 | A |
4942887 | Abdelgawad et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4949736 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962774 | Thomasson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4972853 | Brackmann et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972854 | Kiernan et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984588 | Stewart, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
5046514 | Bolt | Sep 1991 | A |
5050621 | Creighton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058608 | Henning et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060676 | Hearn et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074319 | White et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5099864 | Young et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101839 | Jakob et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105836 | Gentry et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105838 | White et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5129408 | Jakob et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152304 | Bokelman et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5178166 | Newsome et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190061 | Brackmann et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203354 | Hickle | Apr 1993 | A |
5360023 | Blakley et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5392792 | Banerjee et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392793 | Molloy | Feb 1995 | A |
5435326 | Gentry et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5458107 | Balogh et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5524647 | Brackmann | Jun 1996 | A |
5533530 | Young et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5568819 | Gentry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584306 | Beauman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598868 | Jakob et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5666976 | Adams et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690127 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5709227 | Arzonico et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715844 | Young et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724998 | Gellatly et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727571 | Meiring et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743251 | Howell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746230 | Arterbery et al. | May 1998 | A |
5839449 | Banerjee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5954061 | Cardarelli | Sep 1999 | A |
5979459 | Schneider | Nov 1999 | A |
6062228 | Loercks et al. | May 2000 | A |
6089238 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6216706 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257242 | Stavridis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345625 | Chew | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6502580 | Luparini | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6718989 | Clarke et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6761174 | Jupe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779529 | Figlar et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6814786 | Zhuang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823873 | Nichols et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6883516 | Hindle et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883523 | Dante | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020166561 | Sinclair, Jr. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030200973 | Xue et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200976 | Yoo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040025890 | Yen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040159327 | Dante | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040261807 | Dube et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050066981 | Crooks et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060201524 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070169785 | Gedevanishvili et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181140 | Xue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186945 | Olegario et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070261706 | Banerjea et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080017204 | Braunshteyn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035162 | Braunshteyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047571 | Braunshteyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080163877 | Zhuang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080216848 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216850 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216851 | Olegario et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216853 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
679657 | Oct 1966 | BE |
1000454 | Dec 1988 | BE |
3439861 | May 1985 | DE |
0 054 705 | Jun 1982 | EP |
0077123 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0101840 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0212879 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0 327 655 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0364256 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0471581 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0482872 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0568107 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 481596 | Jan 1994 | EP |
2481581 | Nov 1981 | FR |
2873899 | Feb 2006 | FR |
1058342 | Feb 1967 | GB |
1228747 | Apr 1971 | GB |
1236344 | Jun 1971 | GB |
1245518 | Sep 1971 | GB |
1256154 | Dec 1971 | GB |
1428018 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2100573 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2149287 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2177890 | Feb 1987 | GB |
19697 | Nov 1983 | NZ |
216244 | Sep 1989 | NZ |
WO 9009741 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 9926495 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0000047 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0113745 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0203819 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2006070289 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006082529 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007093757 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007110650 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070235050 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60786352 | Mar 2006 | US | |
60858407 | Nov 2006 | US | |
60905833 | Mar 2007 | US |