Heretofore, cigarettes with high levels of ventilation have usually had unacceptably low levels of resistance to draw (RTD) unless some counter measure was in place to make-up the shortfall in RTD. In the past, high density cellulose acetate filter segments were used to address the short fall. However such filtered segments tended to reduce tar delivery (FTC), with little or no effect upon gas phase components of mainstream tobacco smoke, such as carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxide (NO). This solution tended to worsen the CO to tar (FTC) ratios in lower delivery (FTC tar) cigarettes.
Ventilation has a desirable attribute in that, when operating alone, it will reduce both the particulate phase and the gas phase of mainstream smoke. Highly ventilated cigarettes however have drawbacks in RTD as previously discussed.
In accordance with one embodiment, a smoking article comprises: a tobacco rod adapted to produce mainstream smoke; a filter having an upstream end and a downstream end, the filter arranged to receive mainstream smoke at the upstream end, the filter comprising: a tubular segment open at the downstream end thereof; and a flow restrictor contained within the tubular segment; and tipping paper attaching the filter with the tobacco rod and including an air-admissible ventilating zone at a location between the upstream end and the downstream end of the filter.
In accordance with another embodiment, a smoking article comprising a tobacco rod and a filter, the filter comprises: a paper filter tube open at a downstream end thereof and attached to the tobacco rod with tipping paper; a flow restrictor contained within the filter tube, the flow restrictor dividing the filter tube into an upstream cavity and a downstream cavity; and a ventilation zone at a location along the downstream cavity, the ventilation zone comprising a plurality of perforations extending through the tipping paper and the filter tube.
In accordance with a further embodiment, a smoking article comprises: a tobacco rod adapted to produce mainstream smoke; a filter having an upstream end and a downstream end, the filter arranged to receive mainstream smoke at the upstream end, the filter comprising: a paper tubular segment open at a downstream end thereof; and a flow restrictor contained within the tubular segment, the flow restrictor comprising a paper foam rod having at least one channel, wherein the at least one channel is introduced into an outer periphery of the paper foam rod; and tipping paper attaching the filter with the tobacco rod and including an air-admissible ventilating zone at a location between the upstream end and the downstream end of the filter.
The filter 14 preferably includes a tubular segment (or filter tube) 18 having an upstream end 20, a downstream end or mouth end 22, and a flow restrictor 30 situated within the tubular segment 18. The flow restrictor 30 preferably comprises a partition 32 having at least one orifice (or flow restriction) 34 of reduced diameter. The flow restrictor 30 divides the tubular segment 18 into an upstream segment or cavity 24, and a downstream segment or cavity 26 open at the downstream end 22 thereof. The filter 14 can also include a porous paper plug (not shown) on the downstream or mouth end 22 of the filter 14 for appearance. It can be appreciated that the porous paper plug preferably does not extend to the flow restrictor 30 in order to maintain a downstream segment or cavity 26 within the filter 14.
The tubular segment 18 is preferably made of a paper product or a biodegradable plastic or other suitable material having degradability properties. The tubular segment 18 preferably has a length 19 of approximately 20.0 to 40.0 mm and more preferably about 25.0 to 35.0 mm and most preferably approximately 27.5 to 31 mm with an inner diameter 21 of approximately 7.0 to 8.0 mm and more preferably approximately 7.4 to 7.8 mm.
Different ventilation levels (10-90%) can be incorporated into the tubular segment 18, through combinations of the flow restrictor 30, a ventilating zone 40 (or ventilation zone), the permeability of the tipping paper 16, and the permeability of the paper or material used for the tubular segment 18, to provide a desired smoke delivery (FTC tar) from the same cigarette. In accordance with one embodiment, the tubular segment 18 is preferably constructed from a rigid paper that forms a self-supporting tubular segment that can be perforated by suitable laser equipment or other device to add at least one circumferential row or series of ventilation holes 42 to the tubular segment 18.
In accordance with another embodiment, an air-admissible ventilating zone 40 (or ventilating zone) can be established with a first row (and optionally a second and possibly third rows) of ventilation holes 42 extending through the tipping paper 16 and the tubular segment 18. In the preferred embodiment, the air-admissible ventilating zone 40 is located near or adjacent to the flow restrictor 30 so that air drawn through the ventilation zone 40 is allowed to mix with the mainstream smoke before arriving at the downstream end or mouth end 22 of the filter 14. In accordance with one embodiment, the ventilation holes 42 are preferably downstream of the flow restrictor 30, such that the ventilation holes 42 are between the flow restrictor 30 and the downstream or mouth end 22. The distance between the ventilating zone 40 (or ventilation holes 42) and the downstream or mouth end 22 of the filter 14 is preferably at least 5 mm and more preferably in the range of 5-20 mm, and most preferably in the range of 10-15 mm. However, it can be appreciated that in accordance with another embodiment the ventilation holes 42 can be upstream of the flow restrictor 30, such that the ventilation holes 42 are between the tobacco rod 12 and the flow restrictor 30.
In accordance with another embodiment, the flow restrictor 30 and the ventilation zone 40 preferably achieve a ventilation level of the smoking article 10 of at least 25% and more preferably at least 50% to 90%. The ventilation level of the smoking article 10 also preferably introduces a resistance to draw (RTD) to the smoker that is at an acceptable level. The resistance to draw (RTD) can also be adjusted by changing the number and the size of the orifices 34 of the flow restrictor 30, as well as the position of the ventilation zones 40 on the filter 14. In accordance with another embodiment, the wrapping paper 13 can have high permeability or alternatively perforations can be used to achieve high tobacco rod ventilation.
Furthermore, the embodiments provide the necessary amount of resistance to draw (RTD) while maintaining the desired degree of high ventilation throughout the smoke. The latter attribute is achieved by placement of the ventilating zone 40 downstream of the restrictor 30. Furthermore, placing the ventilating zone 40 in a spaced apart relation to the downstream end or mouth end 22 assures mixing of air drawn into the filter 14 through the ventilating zone 40 with mainstream smoke drawn from the tobacco rod 12.
Preferably, the partition 32 has a diameter 36 of approximately 7.0 to 8.0 mm and more preferably approximately 7.4 to 7.8 mm. The partition 32 also preferably has one or optionally, at least one orifice 34 of a diameter 38 of about 0.2 mm to about 0.9 mm. The flow restrictor 30 may be constructed of paper, a plastic or a metal and more preferably made of a paper product, a biodegradable plastic, or other suitable material having degradability properties.
In accordance with another embodiment, a screening material (not shown) can be used to prevent loose tobacco fillers blocking the orifices 34 (or channels 60). The total cigarette or smoking article's 10 resistance to draw (RTD) as well as tar delivery is balanced with combinations of ventilating zones 40, the diameter 38 of the orifices 34 (or channels 60), and the number of orifices 34 (or channels 60). It can be appreciated that with an increased level of ventilation, the air flowing into the smoking article's burning coal will be reduced, which will reduce the amount of tobacco burned, the coal temperature, and smoke component generation. In addition, enhanced diffusion out of the cigarette paper (i.e., outer wrapper 13) resulting from the slower flow rate can further reduce the gaseous smoke components such as carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxide (NO).
It is to be appreciated that in all embodiments, the filter 14 may be constructed from simple combining techniques typically used in the industry for manufacturing cigarettes at high speeds. Additionally, each embodiment can include at least one support 28 (
It can be appreciated that with a smoking article 10 as shown in
The embodiments as shown and described herein provide the benefit of a highly ventilated smoking article with desired amounts of resistance to draw and provisions for facilitating high-speed cigarette manufacturing on conventional cigarette making equipment.
It will be understood that the foregoing description is of the preferred embodiments, and is, therefore, merely representative of the article and methods of manufacturing the same. It can be appreciated that variations and modifications of the different embodiments in light of the above teachings will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the articles and methods as set forth in the attached claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 60/906,118, filed Mar. 9, 2007, which is incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2511898 | Brothers | Jun 1950 | A |
2547119 | Henderson | Apr 1951 | A |
2592553 | Frankenburg et al. | Apr 1952 | A |
2592554 | Frankenburg | Apr 1952 | A |
2598680 | Frankenburg | Jun 1952 | A |
2764513 | Brothers | Sep 1956 | A |
2769734 | Bandel | Nov 1956 | A |
2954772 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954778 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954783 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954786 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
3098492 | Wurzburg et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3234949 | White et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3236244 | Irby, Jr. et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3255760 | Selke | Jun 1966 | A |
3283762 | Kissel | Nov 1966 | A |
3292635 | Kolodny | Dec 1966 | A |
3318312 | Curtis, Jr. | May 1967 | A |
3323525 | Miller | Jun 1967 | A |
3356094 | Ellis et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3389705 | Levavi | Jun 1968 | A |
3395713 | Ent-Keller | Aug 1968 | A |
3441028 | Wall | Apr 1969 | A |
3457927 | Siragusa | Jul 1969 | A |
3496945 | Tomkin | Feb 1970 | A |
3504677 | Doppelt | Apr 1970 | A |
3581748 | Cameron | Jun 1971 | A |
3599646 | Berger et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3630210 | Haslam | Dec 1971 | A |
3637447 | Berger et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3646941 | Doppelt | Mar 1972 | A |
3648712 | Patterson | Mar 1972 | A |
3685522 | Kleinhans | Aug 1972 | A |
3738375 | Doumas | Jun 1973 | A |
3756249 | Selke et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3759270 | Wright | Sep 1973 | A |
3860011 | Norman | Jan 1975 | A |
3877470 | Jewett et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3931824 | Miano et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3968804 | Kelly et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3986515 | Egri | Oct 1976 | A |
4016887 | Uroshevich | Apr 1977 | A |
4022222 | Berger | May 1977 | A |
4038994 | Aikman | Aug 1977 | A |
4091821 | Scorzo | May 1978 | A |
4119105 | Owens, Jr. | Oct 1978 | A |
4120310 | Lee et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4135523 | Luke et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4158364 | Ligeti | Jun 1979 | A |
4182349 | Selke | Jan 1980 | A |
4186756 | Takemoto et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4197863 | Clayton et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4256122 | Johnson | Mar 1981 | A |
4256126 | Seligman et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4273141 | Van Tilburg | Jun 1981 | A |
4292983 | Mensik | Oct 1981 | A |
4340072 | Bolt et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4341228 | Keritsis et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4343319 | Cantrell | Aug 1982 | A |
4357950 | Berger | Nov 1982 | A |
4380241 | Horsewell | Apr 1983 | A |
4386618 | Cantrell | Jun 1983 | A |
4421126 | Gellatly | Dec 1983 | A |
4460001 | Browne et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4469112 | Browne et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4506683 | Cantrell et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508525 | Berger | Apr 1985 | A |
4515170 | Cantrell et al. | May 1985 | A |
4542755 | Selke et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4559955 | Brockway et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4564030 | Jessup et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4574820 | Pinkerton et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4585015 | Silberstein | Apr 1986 | A |
4617946 | Keith | Oct 1986 | A |
4620553 | Bale et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4622982 | Gaisch et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4637409 | Berger | Jan 1987 | A |
4646762 | Riehl et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4649944 | Houck, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4660579 | Horsewell et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4677992 | Bliznak | Jul 1987 | A |
4687008 | Houck, Jr. et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4700726 | Townsend et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702263 | Strydom | Oct 1987 | A |
4732168 | Resce et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4754766 | Luke et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4784632 | Berger | Nov 1988 | A |
4791943 | Kupper et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4793365 | Sensabaugh et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4867182 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4896682 | Liew | Jan 1990 | A |
4924886 | Litzinger | May 1990 | A |
4942887 | Abdelgawad et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4949736 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962774 | Thomasson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4972853 | Brackmann et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972854 | Kiernan et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984588 | Stewart, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
5046514 | Bolt | Sep 1991 | A |
5050621 | Creighton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058608 | Henning et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060676 | Hearn et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074319 | White et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5099864 | Young et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101839 | Jakob et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105836 | Gentry et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105838 | White et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5129408 | Jakob et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152304 | Bokelman et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5178166 | Newsome et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190061 | Brackmann et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203354 | Hickle | Apr 1993 | A |
5360023 | Blakley et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5392792 | Banerjee et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392793 | Molloy | Feb 1995 | A |
5435326 | Gentry et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5458107 | Balogh et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5524647 | Brackmann | Jun 1996 | A |
5533530 | Young et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5568819 | Gentry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584306 | Beauman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598868 | Jakob et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5666976 | Adams et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690127 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5709227 | Arzonico et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715844 | Young et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724998 | Gellatly et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727571 | Meiring et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743251 | Howell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746230 | Arterbery et al. | May 1998 | A |
5839449 | Banerjee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5954061 | Cardarelli | Sep 1999 | A |
5979459 | Schneider | Nov 1999 | A |
6062228 | Loercks et al. | May 2000 | A |
6089238 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6216706 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257242 | Stavridis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345625 | Chew | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6502580 | Luparini | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6718989 | Clarke et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6761174 | Jupe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779529 | Figlar et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6814786 | Zhuang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823873 | Nichols et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6883516 | Hindle et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883523 | Dante | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020166561 | Sinclair, Jr. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030200973 | Xue et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200976 | Yoo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040025890 | Yen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040159327 | Dante | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040261807 | Dube et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050066981 | Crooks et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060201524 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070169785 | Gedevanishvili et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181140 | Xue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186945 | Olegario et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070235050 | Li et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070261706 | Banerjea et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080017204 | Braunshteyn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035162 | Braunshteyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047571 | Braunshteyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080163877 | Zhuang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080216848 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216850 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216851 | Olegario et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100288293 | Slasli et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
679657 | Oct 1966 | BE |
1000454 | Dec 1988 | BE |
3439861 | May 1985 | DE |
0 054 705 | Jun 1982 | EP |
0077123 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0101840 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0212879 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0 327 655 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0364256 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0471581 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0482872 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0568107 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0481596 | Jan 1994 | EP |
2481581 | Nov 1981 | FR |
2873899 | Feb 2006 | FR |
1058342 | Feb 1967 | GB |
1228747 | Apr 1971 | GB |
1236344 | Jun 1971 | GB |
1245518 | Sep 1971 | GB |
1256154 | Dec 1971 | GB |
1428018 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2100573 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2149287 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2177890 | Feb 1987 | GB |
19697 | Nov 1983 | NZ |
216244 | Sep 1989 | NZ |
WO 9009741 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 9926495 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0000047 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0113745 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0203819 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2006070289 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006082529 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007093757 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007110650 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080216853 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60906118 | Mar 2007 | US |