Heretofore, cigarettes with high levels of ventilation have usually had unacceptably low levels of resistance to draw (RTD) unless some counter measure was in place to make-up the shortfall in RTD. In the past, high density cellulose acetate filter segments were used to address the shortfall. However such filtered segments tended to reduce tar delivery (FTC), with little or no effect upon gas phase constituents of mainstream tobacco smoke, such as carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxide (NO). This solution tended to worsen the CO to tar (FTC) ratios in lower delivery (FTC tar) cigarettes.
Ventilation has a desirable attribute in that, when operating alone, it will reduce both the particulate phase and the gas phase of mainstream smoke. Highly ventilated cigarettes however have drawbacks in RTD as previously discussed.
Provided is a smoking article including a flow restriction device, a cavity and an upstream ventilation zone. Preferably, the ventilation zone is in communication with the cavity. In an embodiment, the smoking article can also include additional ventilation zones upstream and/or downstream of the flow restriction device.
In accordance with an embodiment, a smoking article comprises: a tobacco rod, which is adapted to produce mainstream smoke; a filter attached to said tobacco rod, the filter having an upstream end portion and a downstream end portion, the filter comprising: a flow restricting segment of smoke impermeable material, which includes at least one open flow passage therethrough to deliver mainstream smoke; and a cavity downstream of the flow restricting segment; a permeable wrapping paper, which circumscribes the tobacco rod and the filter; and at least one ventilation zone upstream of the flow restricting segment.
In accordance with a further embodiment, a smoking article comprises: a densely packed tobacco rod adapted to produce mainstream smoke; and a filter having an upstream end portion and a downstream end portion, said filter arranged to receive mainstream smoke at said upstream end portion, said filter comprising: a diffusion zone, which allows significant air inflow to dilute and transfer the smoke directly to the downstream portion of filter, the diffusion zone having a highly permeable cellulose acetate hollow tube and a high permeable wrapping paper; and a delivery zone, the delivery zone comprising a flow restriction element with a downstream cavity as a flow buffer for desirable draw resistance, wherein the flow restriction element includes a restriction establishing a substantial portion of a predetermined resistance to draw of said smoking article.
Described herein is a highly ventilated smoking article with desired amounts of resistance to draw and having provisions for facilitating high speed cigarette manufacturing on conventional cigarette making equipment.
a) and 8(b) are graphs showing Per TPM (Total Particulate Matter) Light Gas Delivery versus TPM Delivery for commercially available cigarettes and a smoking article as shown in
a) and 10(b) are graphs showing Total Pressure Drop and Percentage Dilution (%) versus Length of Rod for a series of smoking articles as shown in
Since the 1960's there has been significant efforts to develop mechanical type filters, such as jet or impaction filters, which are constructed with at least one flow restriction filter element and substantial downstream air dilution, in an effort to reduce tar levels in mainstream smoke. The flow restriction filter element can be an impaction plate, a short polymer column with a number of holes along the axis, or simply a high density cellulose acetate plug with holes therein. Such mechanical filters rely heavily on the high flow-rate through the holes, which correlates strongly to high pressure drops before and after the flow restriction element.
However, there are drawbacks in current designs due to inconsistency and less redundancy of pressure drop and percentage air dilution, as the functioning of the filter unit is critically dependent on hole dimensions, wall thicknesses, number of holes, downstream air dilution, and total particulate matter (TPM) build-up during smoking.
Described herein is a smoking article provides the benefit of a highly ventilated smoking article with desired amounts of resistance to draw, in which air dilution is positioned upstream (frontal) to a flow restriction element for improved consistency and redundancy of various smoking characteristics, such as percentage air dilution and total pressure drop. In general, the smoking article combines a mainstream smoke produced by a tobacco rod with a desirable level of air dilution in the cigarette rod or column which includes a highly permeable wrapping paper, which is optionally perforated, or in a perforated mixing chamber before access into a flow restriction filter element. The total combined volume through the flow restriction filter element is preferably significantly higher (i.e., in accordance with an embodiment, about a 3 fold increase for a typical ultra light smoke delivery without filtration, which combines about 25 percent mainstream smoke with about 75 percent air dilution), which results in an increased flow-rate and, therefore, an improved efficiency of the flow restriction filters.
In accordance with another embodiment, the increased total volume also provides for a flow restriction element to have larger holes for improved redundancy of pressure drop and machinability, since during the course of smoking, the total pressure drop is largely controlled by the size of the hole and/or length of the flow restriction column, independent of upstream air dilution.
In a preferred embodiment, the smoking article includes a flow restriction element and at least one ventilation zone upstream of the flow restriction element so as to provide about 20% to about 80% air to mainstream smoke. In an embodiment, the smoking article also includes at least one ventilation zone downstream of the flow restriction element.
In accordance with another embodiment, a smoking article is described herein that includes a combustion zone comprised of a short but densely packed tobacco rod, a diffusion zone which allows significant airflow, and a delivery zone comprised of at least one flow restriction element with a downstream cavity.
Referring now to
Typically, the generally cylindrical rod 20 of smoking material 21 is referred to as a “tobacco rod” and has a lit end 12 and a tipped end 14. The smoking material 21 (or tobacco filler) normally is employed so as to fill the tobacco rod at a packing density of about 100 mg/cm3 to about 300 mg/cm3, and often about 150 mg/cm3 to about 275 mg/cm3. The smoking material 21 is wrapped with a low permeability paper to form the cylindrical rod 20. Tobaccos can have a processed form, such as processed tobacco stems (e.g., cut-rolled or cut-puffed stems), volume expanded tobacco (e.g., puffed tobacco, such as propane expanded tobacco and dry ice expanded tobacco), or reconstituted tobacco (e.g., reconstituted tobaccos manufactured using paper-making type or cast sheet type processes). Typically, tobacco materials for cigarette manufacture are used in a so-called “blended” form. For example, certain popular tobacco blends, commonly referred to as “American blends,” comprise mixtures of flue-cured tobacco, burley tobacco and Oriental tobacco, and in many cases, certain processed tobaccos, such as reconstituted tobacco and processed tobacco stems. It can be appreciated that the precise amount of each type of tobacco within a tobacco blend used varies from smoking article to smoking article. If desired, in addition to the aforementioned tobacco materials, the tobacco blend can further include other flavor components, including menthol.
The tobacco rod 20 is arranged such that the filter 40 and tobacco rod 20 are axially aligned in an end-to-end relationship, preferably abutting one another. The filter 40 has a generally cylindrical shape, and the diameter thereof is essentially equal to the diameter of the tobacco rod 20. Preferably, the upstream end 16 and the buccal or downstream end 18 of the filter 40 are open to permit the passage of air and smoke therethrough.
The outer wrapper or wrapping paper 30 is preferably a highly permeably or porous wrapping material having permeability of at least 50 Coresta units (1 Coresta unit (Cu)=1 cm/kPa), and more preferably at least 100 Coresta units, and more preferably between about 100 Coresta units and about 200 Coresta units.
In an embodiment, the filter 40 includes an upstream filter segment 42 and a downstream filter segment 46 comprised of filtering material and a flow restricting segment 44 circumscribed by the wrapping material 30. Preferably, the upstream filter segment 42 and the downstream filter segment 46 of filtering material are low particulate efficiency filter segments preferably constructed from less densely packed, large diameter fiber cellulose acetate tow of about 5.0 denier to about 15.0 denier per filament (dpf), such as 8 dpf, and about 10,000 to about 50,000 total denier (td), such as 35,000 td.
In accordance with an embodiment, the flow restricting segment 44 includes one or more flow restriction passages or holes 130 therethrough. The flow restricting segment 44 can include at least one flow restriction element 45 adjacent the first upstream filter plug 46 of a length of about 3 mm to about 10 mm, more preferably about 3 mm to about 7 mm in length.
Preferably, a cavity 146 within the filter 40 is defined at least in part by a tubular filter segment 147, such as a cylindrical cellulosic tube and by the spaced apart relation of the downstream filter plug and the flow restrictor disc 45.
The filter 40 attaches to the tobacco rod 20 by a tipping material 50, which preferably circumscribes the filter 40 and an adjacent portion of the tobacco rod 20. The tipping material 50 is typically a paper like product; however, any suitable material can be used. In accordance with an embodiment, the inner surface of the tipping material 50 is fixedly secured to the outer surface of the wrapping material 30, using a suitable adhesive.
Upon lighting of the smoking article 10, the mainstream smoke is generated by and drawn from the tobacco rod 20 and through the filter 40. As used herein, the terms “upstream” and “downstream” describe relative positions between the filter 40 and other features in relation to the direction of mainstream smoke as it is drawn from the tobacco rod 20 and through the filter 40.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the upstream and downstream (i.e., mouth end or buccal end) plugs 42, 46 of filtering material are a starch-based, polypropylene, or plasticized cellulose acetate tow, filter paper or other suitable material. The upstream and the downstream plugs 42, 46 of filtering material can alternatively have the form of a gathered web (e.g., polypropylene web, polyester web, cellulosic web or starch-based web). However, the filtering material can be carbon-on-tow (a cellulose acetate element mixed with an activated carbon material throughout), activated carbon, gas-vapor phase sorbents or any other suitable filtering material. In accordance with an embodiment, the upstream and the downstream plugs 42, 46 of filtering material each have a generally cylindrical shape, and an outer diameter thereof that is essentially equal to the outer diameter of the tobacco rod 20.
The filter 40 typically has an overall length of about 15 mm to about 40 mm in length for a smoking article 10 having an overall length of about 80 to about 160 mm. Each filter segment 42, 46 of filtering material can have an equal length, or the upstream and downstream plugs 42, 46 can have different lengths. It can also be appreciated that the length of the upstream and downstream plugs 42, 46 of filtering material can vary depending on additional materials within the filtering material including activated carbons or other gas-vapor phase sorbent or additive materials.
The flow restriction element 45 establishes the flow restriction and is preferably sized to contribute sufficient pressure drop such that the smoking article 10 presents a resistance to draw of at least about 70 mm water or greater, and more preferably in the range of about 80 mm water to about 120 mm water. The flow restriction element 45 preferably has one or optionally, at least one or more flow restriction passages or holes 130 of a diameter of about 0.5 mm to about 0.9 mm and more preferably about 0.5 mm to 0.7 mm. Since the pressure drop of the flow restricting segment 44 depends on the open area, one or more flow restriction passages or holes 130 can also be used. In accordance with an embodiment, the flow restriction element 45 has a diameter of about 7.0 mm to about 8.0 mm, and more preferably a diameter of about 7.4 mm to about 7.8 mm.
In accordance with an embodiment, the flow restricting segment 44 may be constructed of paper, a plastic or a metal and more preferably made of a paper product or a biodegradable plastic or other suitable material having degradability properties.
The smoking article 10 also preferably includes at least one ventilation zone 60, which provides air dilution to the smoking article 10. In accordance with an embodiment, the wrapping material 30 is perforated with a first row (and optionally second and possibly a third row) or series of ventilation holes or perforations 62, which extend through the wrapping material 30 to form a ventilation zone 60. Alternatively, the outer wrapper or wrapping paper 30 can be a porous wrapping material or paper material having a permeability of less than 100 Coresta units with a row or series of ventilation holes or perforations 62. Preferably, the holes or perforations 62 of the ventilation zone 60 achieve a ventilation level of the smoking article 10 of at least about 20% and more preferably at least about 50% to about 90% by volume.
In a preferred embodiment, the ventilation zone 60 is located upstream of the flow restricting segment 44. The ventilation zone 60 can be located along the tobacco rod 20 and/or along the filter 40. The holes and/or perforations 62 can be formed using online laser perforation techniques, off-line, pre-perforated tipping paper, mechanical perforation, electrostatic perforation and other techniques. By locating the ventilation zone 60 upstream of the flow restricting segment 44, percent air dilution and total pressure drop can be controlled. Also, since the ventilation zone 60 is upstream, the total smoke volume going through the flow restriction filter is increased so as to increase the flow-rate and improve the efficiency of the filter. During the course of smoking, the total pressure drop is largely controlled by the size of the hole in the flow restriction filter element and/or the length of the flow restriction filter element, independent of the upstream air dilution.
The filter 40 can also include a plurality of ventilation holes or perforations 60 on either the downstream and/or upstream side of the flow restricting segment 44 in addition to the upstream ventilation zone described above. In use, the filter 40 incorporating the at least one flow restriction element 45 into the cigarette or smoking article 10, minimizes the ratio of total particulate matter (TPM) and tar yield by increasing the filtration efficiency for particulates (tar) with the increase of flow rate or puff volume. Specifically, the range of TPM or tar that the smoker is exposed to, by increasing puff volume, is reduced due to the reduction in smoking elasticity, i.e. reduction in Tar (mg/cigt)MDPH/Tar (mg/cigt)FTC.
Referring now to
In an embodiment, the upstream cavity within the filter 40 is defined at least in part by the tubular segment 152 and optionally, in part by the space enclosed by the tubular section of the flow restriction element 45. Preferably, the upstream cavity 148 includes a ventilation zone 60 comprised of at least one row, and more preferably 2 to 4 rows of ventilation holes and/or perforations 62. The tubular segment 152 is preferably constructed from a hollow acetate tube (HAT) and is preferably air permeable (low density) so that ventilation air may be drawn through ventilation holes 62 into the upstream cavity 148 during a puff. Other low density, low filtration materials can also be used to construct the tubular segment 152.
In a preferred embodiment, the ventilation zone 60 comprises a plurality of ventilation holes 62 arranged in one or more circumferential rows, which extend through the tipping paper 50 and the highly permeable wrapping paper 30, and optionally/partially into or through the tubular segment 152. This arrangement facilitates the use of off-line laser perforation techniques to provide ventilation holes 62. Other techniques may be used to create the ventilation zone 60 such as using on-line, laser perforation, mechanical pin perforation techniques, electrostatic perforation and other techniques. In accordance with an embodiment, the ventilation holes 62 in the tipping paper 50 allow atmospheric air to be drawn into the restricting ventilation zone 40, through the tubular segment 152, and into the upstream cavity 148. When a hollow acetate tube forms at least part of the tubular segment 152, in accordance with another embodiment, perforations need not be made in the upstream cavity 148 because the material is air permeable.
In accordance with an embodiment, it may be desirable to provide several ventilating zones 60 at locations in superposing relation to the one or more flow restriction passages or holes 130 provided in the flow restricting filter segment 44 so as to achieve the more elevated ventilation levels. Preferably, the ventilation zone 60 and the one or more flow restriction passages or holes 130 in the flow restricting filter segment 44 achieve a ventilation level of the smoking article of at least 25% and more preferably at least 50% to 90%.
Referring to
In accordance with one embodiment, the tobacco rod 20 has a packing density of 10% to 200% higher than a regular tobacco rod. The length 22 of the tobacco rod 20 is preferably 2/10 to 8/10 of the length of a regular tobacco rod. In accordance with an embodiment, the densely packed tobacco rod 20 provides for a slower burning tobacco rod 20 as compared to a regular or commercially available tobacco rod. In accordance with an embodiment, the tobacco rod 20 has a length of about 25 to 35 mm and more preferably about 30 mm for a smoking article 10 having an overall length of about 80 to 90 mm and more preferably about 84 mm.
The diffusion zone or segment 150 is preferably comprised of a media which allows significant air inflow to dilute and transfer the smoke directly to the downstream portion of filter 40. In accordance with an embodiment, the diffusion zone 150 includes a highly permeable cellulose acetate hollow tubular segment 152, which is surrounded by a highly permeable wrapping material 30 with varying permeability, and which may optionally include additional ventilation 60 in the form of at least one row of perforations 62.
The filter 40 also includes a flow restricting segment 44, which includes at least one flow restriction element 45 with a downstream cavity 146 as a flow buffer for a desirable draw resistance (i.e., pressure drop) without significant filtration effect to the tar in the mainstream smoke. In an alternative embodiment, low efficiency filters, such as whistle-through cellulose acetate filter or a recess filter, can be placed adjacent to the flow restriction element 45 to achieve optimized flow control.
In accordance with an embodiment, the filter 40 includes a flow restriction element 45 in the form of an annular disk 132 that defines at least one or more flow restriction passages or holes 130 (or flow restriction) of reduced diameter. In accordance with an embodiment, the hole 130 preferably has a diameter of about 0.5 mm to about 2.5 mm and more preferably about 0.5 mm to 2.0 mm, and a length of about 0.5 mm to 20 mm, and more preferably about 5 mm to 15 mm.
The downstream cavity 146 is preferably formed with a downstream tubular body portion 147 that spaces the flow restriction element 45 a predetermined distance apart from the downstream segment 46 of filtering material, preferably about 1 mm to about 6 mm, and more preferably about 1 mm to 3 mm. Preferably, the distance between the ventilation zone 60 and the downstream segment 46 of filtering material is at least 5 mm, and more preferably in the range of about 5 mm to about 12 mm.
For example, the flow restriction element 45 can be formed of a polymer column including a single, centered hole 130 having a diameter of about 1.0 mm. A highly permeable cellulose acetate hollow tubular segment 152 can be positioned adjacent to and upstream of the flow restriction element 45 to provide sufficient air inflow. The total pressure drop is largely controlled by the length of the polymer column and the diameter of the single, centered hole.
Referring to
It is to be appreciated that in all embodiments, the filter may be constructed from simple combining techniques typically used in the industry for manufacturing cigarettes at high speeds. Additionally each embodiment includes support about the cavity 146 so as to provide desired firmness throughout length of the filter 40.
In accordance with an embodiment, the diffusion zone 150 includes a highly permeable cellulose acetate hollow tubular segment 152, which is surrounded by a highly permeable wrapping material 30 with varying permeability, and which may optionally include additional ventilation 60 in the form of at least one row, and more preferably at least two or three rows of ventilation holes or perforations 62.
In accordance with an embodiment, the ventilation 60 in combination with tobacco rod 20 and filter 40 with a highly permeable wrapping paper 30 provides the necessary amount of resistance to draw while maintaining the desired degree of high ventilation throughout the smoking article 10. The later attribute is achieved by placement of the ventilation zone 60 upstream of the flow restricting segment 44. Furthermore, placing the ventilation in zone 60 in spaced apart relation to the mouthpiece or downstream plug 48 of filtering material assures mixing of air drawn into the filter 40 through the ventilating zone 60 with mainstream smoke drawn from the tobacco rod 20.
In accordance with an embodiment, the flow restricting segment 44 includes a flow restricting element 45 (or orifice or flow regulator) comprised of a high-density capillary (cellulose acetate) tube having a 1 mm inner diameter and an 8 mm outer diameter, which has shown to provide about 47 or about 87 mm H2O pressure drop at a length of 5 mm or 10 mm, respectively.
In accordance with an embodiment, the smoking article 10 has an overall length of about 84 mm comprising of a tobacco rod 20 of about 30 mm in length, a hollow tubular segment 152 of about 30 mm in length, an upstream segment of filtering material 42 of about 5 mm in length, a flow restricting element 45 of about 5 mm in length, a cavity 146 adjacent to the flow restricting element 45 of about 5 mm in length, and a downstream segment of filtering material 46 of about 9 mm in length. The smoking article 10 is preferably wrapped in a highly permeable wrapping material or paper 30, which extends from the lit end 12 of the tobacco rod 20 to the mouth or buccal end 18 of the filter 40. The wrapping material or paper 30 preferably has a length of about 84 mm. In addition, the tipping material or paper 50 on the mouth or buccal portion of the smoking article 10 preferably has a length of about 27 mm.
a) and 8(b) are graphs showing “Per TPM Light Gas Delivery” versus “TPM Delivery” for commercially available cigarettes and a smoking article as shown in
a) and 10(b) are graphs showing Total Pressure Drop and Percentage Dilution versus Length of Rod for a series of smoking articles as shown in
Total flowrate at the outlet of the mouth-end CA filter:
F=35 cc per 2 seconds(cc/2s)(FTC, 17.5 cc/s); 45 cc/2s; 55 cc/2s−
The Only Input
Flowrate:
F=F7=F6=F5=F4
F4=F3+f3
F3=F2+f2
F2=F1+f1
Therefore, the smoke delivery rate S and ventilation V:
S=F1/F; V=(f1+f2+f3)/F
Pressure drop to the inlet of the CA hollow tube:
R1′=R1
Pressure drop through and at the outlet of the CA hollow tube:
R2′=R2+R1′×r1/(R1′+r1)
R3′=R3+R2′×r2/(R2′+r2)
R4′=R4+R3′×r3/(R3′+r3)
R=R4′+R5+R6+R7
Correlation of pressure drop and flowrate:
(ri,fi);(Ri,Fi) i=1˜7 of each section
Flow distribution:
F7=F6=F5=F4=F
F3=F4×r3/(R3′+r3) f3=F4×R3′/(R3′+r3)
F2=F3×r2/(R2′+r2) f2=F3×R2′/(R2′+r2)
F1=F2×r1/(R1′+r1) f1=F2×R1′/(R1′+r)
It will be understood that the foregoing description is of the preferred embodiments, and is, therefore, merely representative of the article and methods of manufacturing the same. It can be appreciated that variations and modifications of the different embodiments in light of the above teachings will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the articles and methods as set forth in the attached claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/318,245, filed on Mar. 26, 2010, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2511898 | Brothers | Jun 1950 | A |
2547119 | Henderson | Apr 1951 | A |
2592553 | Frankenburg et al. | Apr 1952 | A |
2592554 | Frankenburg | Apr 1952 | A |
2598680 | Frankenburg | Jun 1952 | A |
2764513 | Brothers | Sep 1956 | A |
2769734 | Bandel | Nov 1956 | A |
2954772 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954778 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954783 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
2954786 | Lebert | Oct 1960 | A |
3098492 | Wurzburg et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3234949 | White et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3236244 | Irby, Jr. et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3255760 | Selke | Jun 1966 | A |
3260266 | Miller | Jul 1966 | A |
3283762 | Kissel | Nov 1966 | A |
3292635 | Kolodny | Dec 1966 | A |
3318312 | Curtis, Jr. | May 1967 | A |
3323525 | Miller | Jun 1967 | A |
3356094 | Ellis et al. | Dec 1967 | A |
3389705 | Levavi | Jun 1968 | A |
3395713 | Ent-Keller | Aug 1968 | A |
3441028 | Wall | Apr 1969 | A |
3457927 | Siragusa | Jul 1969 | A |
3496945 | Tomkin | Feb 1970 | A |
3504677 | Doppelt | Apr 1970 | A |
3581748 | Cameron | Jun 1971 | A |
3599646 | Berger et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3630210 | Haslam | Dec 1971 | A |
3637447 | Berger et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3646941 | Doppelt | Mar 1972 | A |
3648712 | Patterson | Mar 1972 | A |
3685522 | Kleinhans | Aug 1972 | A |
3738375 | Doumas | Jun 1973 | A |
3756249 | Selke et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3759270 | Wright | Sep 1973 | A |
3860011 | Norman | Jan 1975 | A |
3877470 | Jewett et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3931824 | Miano et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3968804 | Kelly et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3986515 | Egri | Oct 1976 | A |
4016887 | Uroshevich | Apr 1977 | A |
4022222 | Berger | May 1977 | A |
4034765 | Hall | Jul 1977 | A |
4038994 | Aikman | Aug 1977 | A |
4091821 | Scorzo | May 1978 | A |
4119105 | Owens, Jr. | Oct 1978 | A |
4120310 | Lee et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4135523 | Luke et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4158364 | Ligeti | Jun 1979 | A |
4182349 | Selke | Jan 1980 | A |
4186756 | Takemoto et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4197863 | Clayton et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4209026 | Dock | Jun 1980 | A |
4256122 | Johnson | Mar 1981 | A |
4256126 | Seligman et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4273141 | Jan Van Tilburg | Jun 1981 | A |
4292983 | Mensik | Oct 1981 | A |
4340072 | Bolt et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4341228 | Keritsis et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4343319 | Cantrell | Aug 1982 | A |
4357950 | Berger | Nov 1982 | A |
4380241 | Horsewell | Apr 1983 | A |
4386618 | Cantrell | Jun 1983 | A |
4421126 | Gellatly | Dec 1983 | A |
4460001 | Browne et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4469112 | Browne et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4506683 | Cantrell et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508525 | Berger | Apr 1985 | A |
4515170 | Cantrell et al. | May 1985 | A |
4542755 | Selke et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4559955 | Brockway et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4564030 | Jessup et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4574820 | Pinkerton et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4585015 | Silberstein | Apr 1986 | A |
4617946 | Keith | Oct 1986 | A |
4620553 | Bale et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4622982 | Gaisch et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4637409 | Berger | Jan 1987 | A |
4646762 | Riehl et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4649944 | Houck, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4660579 | Horsewell et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4677992 | Bliznak | Jul 1987 | A |
4687008 | Houck, Jr. et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4700726 | Townsend et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702263 | Strydom | Oct 1987 | A |
4732168 | Resce et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4754766 | Luke et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4784632 | Berger | Nov 1988 | A |
4791943 | Kupper et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4793365 | Sensabaugh et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4809717 | Imbery et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4867182 | Roberts et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4893638 | Lauterbach | Jan 1990 | A |
4896682 | Liew | Jan 1990 | A |
4924886 | Litzinger | May 1990 | A |
4942887 | Abdelgawad et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4949736 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962774 | Thomasson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4972853 | Brackmann et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4972854 | Kiernan et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984588 | Stewart, Jr. | Jan 1991 | A |
5046514 | Bolt | Sep 1991 | A |
5050621 | Creighton et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058608 | Henning et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5060676 | Hearn et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5074319 | White et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5099864 | Young et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101839 | Jakob et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105836 | Gentry et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5105838 | White et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5129408 | Jakob et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5152304 | Bokelman et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5178166 | Newsome et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190061 | Brackmann et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203354 | Hickle | Apr 1993 | A |
5360023 | Blakley et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5392792 | Banerjee et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392793 | Molloy | Feb 1995 | A |
5435326 | Gentry et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5458107 | Balogh et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5524647 | Brackmann | Jun 1996 | A |
5533530 | Young et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549125 | White | Aug 1996 | A |
5568819 | Gentry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584306 | Beauman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598868 | Jakob et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5666976 | Adams et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5690127 | Chapman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5709227 | Arzonico et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715844 | Young et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724998 | Gellatly et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727571 | Meiring et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743251 | Howell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746230 | Arterbery et al. | May 1998 | A |
5839449 | Banerjee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5954061 | Cardarelli | Sep 1999 | A |
5979459 | Schneider | Nov 1999 | A |
6062228 | Loercks et al. | May 2000 | A |
6089238 | Schneider et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6216706 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6257242 | Stavridis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345625 | Chew | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6502580 | Luparini | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6718989 | Clarke et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6761174 | Jupe et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779529 | Figlar et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6814786 | Zhuang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6823873 | Nichols et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6883516 | Hindle et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883523 | Dante | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7878963 | Li et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8109277 | Li et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20020166561 | Sinclair, Jr. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030200973 | Xue et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200976 | Yoo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040025890 | Yen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040159327 | Dante | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040261807 | Dube et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050066981 | Crooks et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060011206 | Clarke | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060201524 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070169785 | Gedevanishvili et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181140 | Xue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186945 | Olegario et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070261706 | Banerjea et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080017204 | Braunshteyn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035162 | Braunshteyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047571 | Braunshteyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080163877 | Zhuang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080216850 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216851 | Olegario et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216853 | Li et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100288293 | Slasli et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110083675 | Olegario et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
679657 | Oct 1966 | BE |
1000454 | Dec 1988 | BE |
3439861 | May 1985 | DE |
0 054 705 | Jun 1982 | EP |
0077123 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0101840 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0212879 | Mar 1987 | EP |
0 327 655 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0364256 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0471581 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0482872 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0568107 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0481596 | Jan 1994 | EP |
2481581 | Nov 1981 | FR |
2873899 | Feb 2006 | FR |
1058342 | Feb 1967 | GB |
1228747 | Apr 1971 | GB |
1236344 | Jun 1971 | GB |
1245518 | Sep 1971 | GB |
1256154 | Dec 1971 | GB |
1428018 | Mar 1976 | GB |
2100573 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2149287 | Jun 1985 | GB |
2177890 | Feb 1987 | GB |
196978 | Nov 1983 | NZ |
216244 | Sep 1989 | NZ |
WO 9009741 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 9926495 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0000047 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0113745 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0203819 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2006070289 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006082529 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2007093757 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007110650 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Oct. 2, 2012 for PCT/IB2011/001155. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120048286 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61318245 | Mar 2010 | US |