This invitationinvention relates to the distribution of inquiries, invitations and proposals by means of an SMS service (Short Message Service) in a telecommunications network. The terms inquiry, invitation and proposal are used interchangeably in the current patent application and also to mean a message or a sequence of messages to which replies are expected in general. Thus, the current patent application is not limited to the SMS distribution of inquiries, invitations and proposals but apply also to requests, queries, questionnaires, surveys, calls, etc.
Typical to the method is thatIn some embodiments a) inquiries are sent and replied to and the replies received using the SMS service, b) the same inquiry is distributed to one or more persons, c) the replies of one or more persons are accepted from those replying to the inquiry, d) multiple inquiries can be active simultaneously and activated by separate inquirers, e) the inquirers can activate multiple individual inquiries with multiple individual distributions.
Typically also theIn some embodiments inquiries are sent according to a distribution list, an inquiry is defined a start time when it will be sent and a deadline until which the replies received will be accepted, the distribution will be active from the start time until the deadline or until all questions have been answered, and sent inquiries and questions are active until the deadline or until they have been answered. The start time can have the current time as a default, meaning typically immediate distribution. A question in a particular inquiry typically, but not necessarily, is sent after a reply to the previous question has been received.
Traditional methods for inquiries, such as mail, telephone, e-mail or Internet, are inefficient and ineffective because 1) response rates suffer from the excessive effort involved in replying, 2) responding does not often produce a fast outcome because of the excessive effort involved in handling responses, and 3) useful inquiries are not conducted, because 4) they are expensive and the results uncertain.
Existing inquiry methods based on SMS services include patent proceeding application WO02/33991, where according to which questions are sent one by one as a text message from an SMS service number ordered from an operator to a replier group selected according to demographic or geographic criteria, and typically the reply address is this same SMS service number in order to allow replying using the “reply to the sender” functionality of the mobile phone without having to type the number.
Existing SMS inquiry methods include the following weaknesses: 1) They are difficult to use in situations where the same replier should reply to several ongoing inquiries, as the inquiries cannot be distinguished from each other without typing identifiers to the reply messages, thus resulting in a lower response rate; 2) Without identifiers within reply messages it is labour intensive to interpret afterwards to which distribution belong the replies to a specific reply address, which makes it difficult to apply distribution-specific pricing and billing, for example according to the size of the distribution or the number of replies received; 3) Replying to the SMS service numbers typically is only possible from the mobile numbers served by those operators from whom the SMS service number in question has been ordered or who has a roaming agreement for SMS service numbers with that operator; 4) Replying to a domestic SMS service number is in general not possible from abroad or from foreign mobile numbers; 5) The SMS service number has to be ordered separately from each operator or from an integrating service provider; 6) If replying to an inquiry is to be made free, a toll-free SMS service number must be used, which involves the problems described above.
The object of the present invention is to remove thealleviate weaknesses involved in the SMS inquiry methods mentioned above by providing a method whereby a replier can reply to several ongoing inquiries in such a way that typing a single letter, number or symbol found in the mobile device is required in the reply message and at the same time: 1) inquiries and invitations can be distributed in practice to almost all GSM networks and to the mobile numbers of all GSM networks without operator agreements, or alternatively, b) free reply messages to domestic repliers can be provided using toll-free SMS service numbers. An SMS inquiry and invitation distribution method that is easier to use and has more universal reachability compared to traditional methods provides a significant improvement in the effectiveness of inquiry processes.
This objective can be achieved by means of an SMS distribution method and systemmethods and systems for inquiries based on the present patent application disclosure, which can be implemented using current technology.
By means of the invention a customer organisation utilising the SMS inquiry distribution method can efficiently and effectively carry out customer inquiries and personnel satisfaction surveys, service level measurements, invitations to jobs, emergency calls, and other inquiries, invitations and proposals. The method isSome embodiments are particularly easy for the replier to use because it requires typing a single character to the reply message at a suitable moment, either at the normal text message price defined by the replier's mobile connection subscription terms, or for free if a toll-free SMS service number is paid for by the customer organisation. The customer organisation can keep track of the replies over the telecommunications network using a WWW browser, by downloading electronic reply reports, and/or by using a communications interface and their own computer system.
The present invention isSome embodiments are based on the idea that 1) different reply addresses can be set for different distributions of inquiries and inquiries sent to the same mobile number and 2) in formulating inquiries as multiple choice questions (with one to several reply alternatives) reply alternatives can automatically be given different choice symbols based on which replies to different inquiries from the same replier to the same reply address can be separated from one another (matching replies with right questions) and 3) by optionally not sending a new question before a reply to a previous question has been received, successive questions can share the same reply address as the order of replies is set by default. Based on the situation and application, reply addresses or choice symbols to reply alternatives as identifiers can be set for the distribution, the inquiry, and the questions within the inquiry. For example, the method can be used to improve the expected delivery times of reply messages by setting reply addresses according to their expected load. The method can also guarantee the authenticity of replies by making reply addresses represent a reply address series identifying the inquiry and the replier.
In the following the invention is described according to the attached drawings.
In
When SMS service numbers are used as reply addresses, replies will be transferred from the operators providing the SMS service numbers and the mobile connections of the recipients (21) to the SMS Server (14) over the telecommunications network (18).
If enough reply addresses are available, each active distribution can be given its own set of reply addresses, and also separate questions in an inquiry can be given different reply addresses, for example for security or performance reasons. If different reply addresses are not available for each active distribution, different reply addresses can be given for those inquiries and/or their questions that are targeting the same mobile number, or alternatively different reply choice symbols given for distributions, inquiries within distributions and/or separate questions within inquiries correspondingly. The advantages of using different choice symbols instead of different reply addresses are the savings in the number of reply addresses required, and the identification of replies on the mobile device to questions of the same inquiry based on the reply address and choice symbols makes replying and the management of replies easier for the replier. The Software (1) sends the activated distribution to the mobile numbers (16) in the distribution list at the set start time via the SMS Server (14) either a) through the SMS gateway (17) functionality of the SMS Server over an IP connection (18) to the SMS service of the sending telecommunications operator (19), or b) by means of the GSM modems of the SMS Server as SMS messages to the mobile network(s) of the mobile operator(s) (20) providing the modems' mobile connections. The replier answers the questions using the reply to the sender functionality by sending a text message to the reply address via the SMS service of the mobile operator (21) of the mobile device. Replying to an inquiry is easy, because it contains one or more choice questions that can be answered by typing (or by selecting on some devices) only the choice symbol for the chosen reply alternative, typically a letter or a number. The Software saves the replies to a database where they are stored for a defined time. Replies received after the deadline of the distribution are discarded. After a reply has been received from everybody on the distribution list, or after the deadline has been reached, the Software produces a distribution report that can downloaded over the telecommunications network to the customer's computer, read with a WWW browser or like, or printed to a printer. Replies can also be monitored in realtime over the telecommunications network with a WWW browser or like, and they can also be transferred to the customer's system. The Software can be set to perform the distribution to the whole distribution list at once or to send to one mobile number at a time until a set number of replies has been received.
In a significant alternative embodiment of the invention the public mobile communication network numbers are implemented in the SMS service infrastructure of the sending operator (19) instead of a GSM modem pool associated with the SMS Server (14), from where the replies are transferred to the SMS Server (14) over the telecommunications network (18).
This method allows also those kinds of multiple choice questions to which more than one reply alternative can be chosen. In this case the Software matches replies to questions, as with single choice questions, but saves and/or forwards to a customer application a number of choice symbols of the reply message instead of just one. This way additional reply alternatives, for example, can be added to questions as security checks or for authentication purposes.
The selection of using reply addresses vs. choice symbols for matching replies to questions does not have to be in this order, i.e. the selection of choice symbols can precede the selection of reply addresses, and the method does not require the use of reply addresses for matching replies to questions.
In the application example 1 of the method a car dealer carries out a customer satisfaction survey and a repair service satisfaction inquiry. The car dealer first transfers a file containing the distribution list to the system implemented according to the method, designs questions for customer satisfaction survey using a WWW browser, sets the start time and the deadline and activates the survey. The car dealer next transfers a file containing the distribution list according to the method, designs questions for the repair service satisfaction inquiry using a WWW browser, sets the start time and deadline and activates the inquiry. The software based on the method automatically defines the reply address for the mobile numbers in the distribution list for the customer satisfaction survey and also the choice symbols. Correspondingly, the software defines the reply address for the mobile numbers in the distribution list for the service satisfaction inquiry and also the choice symbols. If the same mobile numbers are included in the distribution lists, inquiries sent to those are given different reply addresses. If all possible reply addresses for a mobile number are already in use, different inquiry or question-specific choice symbols for the reply alternatives are sent to that mobile number. Separate reply address groups can be defined for repair service satisfaction inquiries and customer satisfaction surveys, which makes the identification of different inquiries easier for the replier and enables pricing variations according to the reply address. Inquiries can also include messages that do not require a reply.
In the application example 2 of the method a hospital carries out a personnel satisfaction survey to certain personnel groups and an emergency alarm in a catastrophe situation to persons off duty. The hospital transfers a file containing a distribution list to the system implemented according to the method, designs the questions and sets the start time and the deadline for the personnel satisfaction survey and activates the survey. The hospital transfers the list of persons off duty in a catastrophe situation to the system according to the method, activates a predefined and automatically updated message sequence for the emergency alarm using a WWW browser or by sending a text message to a number in the system, for example. The software based on the method automatically defines reply addresses and the choice symbols from those available for the mobile numbers in the distribution list of the personnel satisfaction survey. Correspondingly, the software defines the reply addresses and the choice symbols from those available for the mobile numbers in the distribution list for the emergency alarm. If the same mobile numbers are included in both distribution lists, a different reply address from that of the customer satisfaction survey is defined for the emergency alarm sent to those numbers. If all possible reply addresses for the distribution are already in active use, the emergency alarm message sent to the mobile number is given emergency alarm/question-specific choice symbols for the reply alternatives. Separate reply address groups can be defined for customer satisfaction surveys and emergency alarms, which makes the separation of surveys and alarms easier for the replier and enables different pricing. Inquiries and alarms can also include messages that do not require a reply.
In the application example 3 of the method a dentist reminds patients about their annual dental care needs and proposes appointment times. A patient gets an appointment proposal as a text message with time alternatives to choose from by replying with a choice symbol representing the chosen time alternative. If the same patient needs other appointment times as well, for example for children, a different set of choice symbols will be generated for each subsequent unanswered appointment time inquiry for separating the inquiries from one another and enabling the matching of replies to right appointment time proposals.
In the application example 4 of the method a recruitment agency invites candidates to new job assignments. For an assignment the agency sends invitations to a distribution list of potential employees as text messages with reply alternatives, for example “Yes” and “No thanks”. According to the method the “Yes” alternative will be attached a choice symbol “A” and “No thanks” alternative a choice symbol “B”. At the same time there is another assignment to be filled and the agency sends a corresponding invitation to its distribution list of potential employees. It happens that there are some candidates on both distribution lists. The method automatically generates another set of choice symbols for reply alternatives for a second invitation that is sent to the same mobile number as the first invitation, if the first invitation has not yet been replied to by that person. Thus the “Yes” alternative gets a choice symbol “C” and the “No thanks” alternative gets a choice symbol “D” in the second invitation on those mobile devices that have received the invitation to the first assignment with choice symbols “A” and “B” and who have not yet replied to that invitation. In the receiving end the software automatically matches “C” and “D” replies with the second invitation and “A” and “B” replies with the first invitation.
In the application example 5 of the method a service provider runs an SMS inquiry distribution service using the method for matching replies from mobile numbers with the right applications and customers, such as in the examples 1.4 above, with the right distributions, with the right inquiries/invitations and with the right questions.
The application areas and applications of the present invention and solutions based on the present invention are not limited to those described above. In addition to inquiries, invitations and proposals the invention can be applied, for example, as a process measurement method, in field force task allocation, service delivery inquiries, reminders and cancellations, and permission requests. The method can be implemented, for example, as an SMS distribution service, as an SMS distribution system or as an SMS distribution functionality integrated with other systems.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20011680 | Aug 2001 | FI | national |
20060387 | Apr 2006 | FI | national |
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/297,614 filed Oct. 17, 2008, and currently naming Jukka Tapio Aula as a sole inventor, which is the national stage entry of international application No. PCT/FI2007/050210 filed Apr. 20, 2007, which claims priority to Finish Application FI-20060387 filed Apr. 21, 2006. The entire contents of all of the aforementioned applications are herein incorporated by reference. More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,849,323. The reissue applications are Ser. No. 14/519,559 (the present application), Ser. No. 15/095,019, and Ser. No. 15/678,408. Reissue application Ser. No. 15/095,019 (filed Apr. 9, 2016) is a continuation reissue of application Ser. No. 14/519,559. Reissue application Ser. No. 15/678,408 (filed Aug. 16, 2017) is a continuation reissue of application Ser. No. 14/519,559. The present reissue application, U.S. application Ser. No. 14/519,559 is a reissue of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,974 (which matured into U.S. Pat. No. 8,849,323), which further claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/297,614, filed Oct. 17, 2008, which is the national stage entry of international application No. PCT/FI2007/050210 filed Apr. 20, 2007, which claims priority to Finish Application FI-20060387 filed Apr. 21, 2006. A petition for Delayed Priority claim was filed in U.S. patent application Ser. 13/369,974 and granted; thus. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,974 is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application Ser. 10/734,352, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/227,194, filed on Aug. 21, 2002, claims priority under 35 USC 119 and 365(b) to Finnish application No. 20011680, filed in Finland on Aug. 21, 2001. The entire contents of all the aforementioned applications are herein incorporated by reference. Sister Patent Reissue application Ser. No. 13/547,439, having a filing date of Jul. 12, 2012, is a reissue of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/297,614, reissued as U.S. Pat. No. Re. 44,073 on Mar. 12, 2013. Child Application U.S. application Ser. No. 14/551,799 (filed Nov. 24th, 2014 and now abandoned) is a continuation of Ser. No. 14/519,559.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5592666 | Perez | Jan 1997 | A |
5838965 | Kavanagh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5940818 | Malloy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5987467 | Ross et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003036 | Martin | Dec 1999 | A |
6085100 | Teemu | Jul 2000 | A |
6104870 | Frick et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6199076 | Logan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236968 | Kanevsky et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6539360 | Kadaba | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560456 | Lohtia et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6625461 | Bertacchi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6639919 | Kroninger et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6772336 | Dixon, Jr. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6873688 | Aarnio | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6990332 | Vihinen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7149537 | Kupsh et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7154060 | Rosenbaum et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7222081 | Sone | May 2007 | B1 |
7321920 | Washburn | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7406429 | Salonen | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7451118 | McMeen et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7610208 | Salonen | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7610224 | Spiegel | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7619584 | Wolf | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7660397 | Heen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7844674 | Madams et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7996023 | McGary et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8050664 | Salonen | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8145245 | Aula | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8249920 | Smith | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8359242 | Guillot | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8977559 | Smith | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010037264 | Husemann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049785 | Kawan et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007398 | Mendiola et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020028686 | Kagi | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032589 | Shah | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020059146 | Keech | May 2002 | A1 |
20020080822 | Brown et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104007 | Moodie et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111914 | Terada et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128908 | Levin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165000 | Fok | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173319 | Fostick | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174248 | Morriss | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180696 | Maritzen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184509 | Scheidt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188562 | Igarashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191795 | Wills | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005126 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030101071 | Salonen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030163536 | Pettine, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211844 | Omori | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040058694 | Mendiola et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040097247 | Vilkuna et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128158 | Salonen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128173 | Salonen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139318 | Fiala et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157628 | Daniel et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040185883 | Rukman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040198322 | Mercer | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050027608 | Wiesmuller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044042 | Mendiola et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050054286 | Kanjilal | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065995 | Millstein et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050102230 | Haidar | May 2005 | A1 |
20050171738 | Kadaba | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246209 | Salonen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268107 | Harris et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010085 | McMeen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040682 | Goertz et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060075139 | Jungck | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060131385 | Kim | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168064 | Huynh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060224407 | Mills | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271551 | Suojasto | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070010266 | Chaudhuri | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047533 | Criddle et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070105536 | Tingo, Jr. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123246 | Daniel et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135101 | Ramati et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143230 | Narainsamy et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070239578 | Klemens | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070288215 | Goldman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080147408 | Da Palma | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080256191 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285475 | Menditto | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080317224 | Salonen | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090104925 | Aula | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090175422 | Marics et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090264100 | Sapir et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281929 | Boitet et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100030689 | Ramos et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1675637 | Sep 2005 | CN |
0881802 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0967754 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1065899 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1458201 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1546938 | Jun 2005 | EP |
20011680 | Feb 2003 | FI |
000117663 | Dec 2006 | FI |
20060387 | Oct 2007 | FI |
000118586 | Dec 2007 | FI |
2391646 | Nov 2004 | GB |
2435565 | Aug 2007 | GB |
20040013261 | Feb 2004 | KR |
9706603 | Feb 1997 | WO |
0041102 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0052601 | Sep 2000 | WO |
2001013299 | Feb 2001 | WO |
0139033 | May 2001 | WO |
0153991 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2002067602 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2004019223 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2006122399 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007063179 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007122292 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007125171 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007122292 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008017695 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2010000949 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bmd wireless AG; Wirelss Application Messaging Serivce; Unknown 2004. |
Content Gateway, Version 4.0; Development and Billing Manual; Jan. 1, 2005, Telia Sonera Finland Oy; www.sonera.fi/files/sonera.fi/. |
Elisa Plc's Press Release; BookIT Ltd. and Elisa Implement a Handy Mobile Phone-Enabled Check-In Service for Finnair; Jun. 9, 2004; www.elisa.fi. |
Elisa Plc's Press Release; Innovative Solution Receives 2004 European Good Practice Award in Occupational Health and Safety and the appendix BookIT case.pdf; Nov. 22, 2004. |
Empower Interactive Group Ltd.; Virtual Mobile Redirector-Product Information Document; Unknown 2001. |
Finnair Plc's Press Release; Finnair to Introduce the World's Easiest Check-In with a Text Message; Jun. 9, 2004; www.bookit.net/news. |
Finnish Search Report; May 4, 2006. |
Finnish Search Report; Jun. 3, 2009. |
Kauppalehti; Mobiilipalvelujen Oltava Yksinkertaisia; BookIT:n Jukka Salonen uskoo tavallisiin tekstiviesteihin; Macropayment Made by Mobile Consumers; Jul. 2002; pp. 1-2; United States. |
Mobileway; Mobileway Launches its Mobile Transaction Tracker Solution-An Interactive Platform to Authenticate Macropayment Made by Mobile Consumers; Jul. 2002; pp. 1-2; United States. |
Mouly et al.; The GSM System for Mobile Communications; Unknown 1992; pp. 556-560; Palaiseau. |
Penttinen; GSM-tekniikka; WSOY; Unknown 1999; pp. 155-157, 222 and 331-332; Porvoo. |
Verkkouutiset; Sonera Tarjoaa Matkaviestinoperaattoreille Content Gateway-Palvelualustaa; Feb. 21, 2001; www.verkkouutiset.fi. |
Mobileway Launches Its Mobile Transaction Tracker Solution, Press Release from Mobileway Corp., Jul. 11, 2002, San Ramon, CA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12297614 | US | |
Child | 13369974 | US | |
Parent | 10227194 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 10734352 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10734352 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 12297614 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13369974 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 14519559 | US |