This application is discloses a hook with a locking gate. A hook with a locking gate is also disclosed in my co-pending application having Ser. No. 11/713,766, filed Mar. 2, 2007, titled Tie-back snap hook.
(a) Field of the Invention
This invention generally relates to a snap hook with an improved gate mechanism that allows the gate to be loaded in hoop stresses as compared to shear or conventional two-dimensional loads.
(b) Discussion of Known Art
Snap hooks with locking gates that prevent the undesired and unintentional disengagement of the connecting hardware have been used for decades in combination with lanyards for fall protection of workers. However, a limitation of known devices has been inefficient design of the locking gates and the manner of cooperation of the locking gate with the body of the hook to resist external loads, especially loads that are directed to the side (normal to the direction of opening) the gate and to the “top” (in the direction of opening) of the gate. The gate of the snap hook has to be able to resist external loads without opening or resulting in failure by exceeding the strength of the material that comprises the gate. Thus the need for greater safety has been identified by industry, and as a result ANSI (American National Standards Institute) standards have been adopted to address this issue. Previously, gate top and side load strength of snap hooks were developed as an OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) standard, which allowed these loads to be just under 350 pounds. Under the new, ANSI, regulations the gates must be able to withstand a minimum of 3500 pounds of side and top load.
While it is possible to increase the strength of components by merely making them thicker, that is by adding material. This approach does not always work, particularly with the design of the gate on a highly stressed snap hook. The thickening of the gate results in less space for the structure of the hook itself, or results in a much larger, heavier hook, which is more difficult to carry and use by workers that must carry and use these hooks while attached to lanyards.
It has been discovered that the problems left unanswered by known art can be solved by providing a hook with a locking gate that includes:
A hook body having a J-shaped body with a shank and a curved portion, the curved portion extending from the shank and terminating in a nose that is at a distance from the shank to define a mouth;
A gate, the gate having a pair of sidewalls, at least one of the sidewalls having being generally fan-shaped shaped, the gate being pivotally mounted from the hook body and having a gate wall that is adapted for closing the mouth of the hook body, the gate wall having a generally cylindrical inner gate wall surface that extends between the pair of sidewalls, the gate being movable from a first gate position where the gate wall closes the mouth of the hook to a second gate position where the gate wall is away from the nose, providing access through the mouth;
A gate lock, the gate lock having an external cylindrical surface that is adapted for mating with the cylindrical inner gate wall, the gate lock being pivotally mounted from the hook body, the gate lock being moveable from a first lock position where the external cylindrical surface of the gate lock is next to the cylindrical inner gate wall surface when the gate lock is in the first gate position and inhibiting rotation of the gate relative to the hook body, to a second lock position where the external cylindrical surface of the gate lock is no longer next the cylindrical inner surface of the gate wall, thereby allowing the gate to be moved to the second gate position.
According to a highly preferred embodiment of the invention the cylindrical inner surface of the gate wall extends continuously between the sidewalls of the gate. However, it is contemplated that approximations of this will achieve the loading of the gate in hoop-stress while the gate lock is in the first lock position while resisting a load against the gate wall, towards the mouth of the body.
Still further, it is contemplated that the disclosed invention will include a spring that simultaneously biases both the gate and the gate lock towards the first gate position and the first lock position, respectively. In order to ensure consistent collapse and retention of the spring, a biasing tab is incorporated into the gate in order to predisposition the spring in an arched position. It has been found that this provides a reliable compression of the spring in a manner that prevents the spring from buckling into a direction that would impede the opening of the hook when desired.
It should also be understood that while the above and other advantages and results of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings, showing the contemplated novel construction, combinations and elements as herein described, and more particularly defined by the appended claims, it should be clearly understood that changes in the precise embodiments of the herein disclosed invention are meant to be included within the scope of the claims, except insofar as they may be precluded by the prior art.
The accompanying drawings illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention according to the best mode presently devised for making and using the instant invention, and in which:
While the invention will be described and disclosed here in connection with certain preferred embodiments, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments shown and described here, but rather the invention is intended to cover all alternative embodiments and modifications that fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims included herein as well as any equivalents of the disclosed and claimed invention.
Turning now to
Turning now to
Also illustrated in
The mating of the cylindrical inner wall gate surface 42 and the external cylindrical surface 44 of the gate lock 20 is of significant importance.
To increase the load carrying capabilities of known locking snap-hook mechanisms one would have to make the components thicker or switch to higher strength materials. These approaches, however, lead to other problems, which make an inefficient design even less efficient. For instance, increasing the thickness of the components makes the snap-hook heavier, which is highly undesirable for these devices, which must be carried by workmen on lanyards and moved to engagement locations by the user.
In order to engage and secure the disclose snap-hook, the gate 12 will be movable from a first gate position, illustrated in
In order to allow the gate to selectively lock and them move from the first gate position to the second gate position, the gate lock being pivotally mounted from the hook body, the gate lock 20 is moveable from a first lock position, illustrated in
Additionally, as shown in
As stated above, in a highly preferred embodiment of the invention the cylindrical inner surface 42 of the gate wall extends continuously between the sidewalls 34 of the gate 12. However, it is contemplated that approximations of this will achieve the loading of the gate in hoop-stress while the gate lock is in the first lock position while resisting a load against the gate wall, towards the mouth of the body.
Thus it can be appreciated that the above-described embodiments are illustrative of just a few of the numerous variations of arrangements of the disclosed elements used to carry out the disclosed invention. Moreover, while the invention has been particularly shown, described and illustrated in detail with reference to preferred embodiments and modifications thereof, it should be understood that the foregoing and other modifications are exemplary only, and that equivalent changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as claimed, except as precluded by the prior art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1525292 | Greve | Feb 1925 | A |
1622971 | Porter | Mar 1927 | A |
1626866 | Neilson | May 1927 | A |
1753326 | Yingling | Apr 1930 | A |
1879168 | Freysinger | Sep 1932 | A |
1949608 | Johnson | Mar 1934 | A |
1985596 | Bumham | Dec 1934 | A |
2197997 | Dee | Apr 1940 | A |
2490931 | Thompson | Dec 1949 | A |
2514656 | Manson | Jul 1950 | A |
2657446 | Roberts | Nov 1953 | A |
3317972 | Harley | May 1967 | A |
3949451 | Bunn | Apr 1976 | A |
4062092 | Tamada et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4122585 | Sharp | Oct 1978 | A |
4179148 | Johnson | Dec 1979 | A |
4434536 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4528728 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4528729 | Schmidt et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4546523 | Bailey | Oct 1985 | A |
4908913 | Mori | Mar 1990 | A |
4977647 | Casebolt | Dec 1990 | A |
5257441 | Barlow | Nov 1993 | A |
5579564 | Rullo | Dec 1996 | A |
5694668 | Rohlf | Dec 1997 | A |
5735025 | Bailey | Apr 1998 | A |
5896630 | Smith et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6161264 | Choate | Dec 2000 | A |
6283524 | Simond | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6363589 | Calloway et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6718601 | Choate | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6832417 | Choate | Dec 2004 | B1 |
20050229367 | Thompson | Oct 2005 | A1 |