This invention relates to a window balance system for use in a pivotable window assembly.
This invention relates to the field of tilt-in windows. More particularly this invention relates to a balance shoe of a window balance system used in conjunction with a pivot bar mounted on a window sash for rotating the window sash relative to a window frame.
Typical pivotable double hung windows include two window sashes disposed in tracks located in a window frame to allow vertical sliding movement of the sashes. Pivot bars are provided to allow rotational movement of a pivotable window sash about the pivot bars to facilitate cleaning of glazing. To control vertical movement, window balances are used so that the window sashes remain in a position in which they are placed. Balance shoes are used to guide the rotational movement of the window sashes with respect to the window frame. Typically, the balance shoes are coupled to window balances with a connecting member. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,398, entitled “Tilt Window Balance Shoe Assembly with Three Directional Locking” issued to H. Dale Yates, Jr., the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
One of the problems with balance shoes and window balances for pivotable double hung windows is that they are difficult to install. In order to install a pivotable double hung window with balance shoes and window balances, the following installation steps typically must be followed. First, before the window frame is assembled, the balance shoes are inserted into jamb tracks. Next, connecting members are used to attach the balance shoes to the window balances. The balance shoes generally have an opening to accept the pivot bars that are mounted on window sashes. Finally, the sashes are made operable by inserting the pivot bars into the balance shoes and rotating the window sash up to a vertical position in the jamb tracks. The installation process is rather complex and difficult. Repair costs for replacing balance shoes are also significant. In order to change a malfunctioning or failed balance shoe, the jamb tracks either need to be deformed or replaced to gain access to the problematic balance shoe for removal and replacement.
In general, in one aspect, the invention relates to a balance shoe. The balance shoe includes a frame, a locking member at least partially disposed within the frame, a cam in communication with the locking member, and a connecting device for attaching the balance shoe within a window balance. Embodiments of the invention can include the following features. The connecting device can include one or more retractable tabs that engage the window balance directly. The frame can further include a frame pocket sized to receive a fastener. The cam can include at least one camming surface and a keyhole opening for receiving a pivot bar attached to a window sash. The cam is at least partially housed within the frame and is disposed within a space enclosed by the locking member. Upon rotating the cam with the pivot bar, the locking member engages the window jamb. In one embodiment, the locking member includes two opposing ends integrally connected by a spring member. The cam is located within a space between the opposing ends of the locking member, and upon rotating the cam with the pivot bar, the opposing ends engage the window jamb. In another embodiment, the locking member includes a plate, which is parallel to a back surface of the frame. The cam is located within a space between the plate and the frame such that rotating the cam with the pivot bar forces the plate to engage the window jamb.
In another aspect, the invention relates to an inverted window balance system for use within a pivotable double hung window assembly. The inverted window balance system includes a rigid U-shaped channel with a plurality of openings in the channel walls for securing the contents in the channel, which include an extension spring, a system of pulleys, a cord to connect the extension spring via the system of pulleys with the window sash, and a balance shoe. The balance shoe includes a frame, a locking member at least partially disposed within the frame, a cam in communication with the locking member, and a connecting device for attaching the balance shoe within the rigid U-shaped channel. Embodiments of this aspect of the invention can include the following features. At least a portion of the balance shoe is disposed within the rigid U-shaped channel. The connecting device can include one or more retractable tabs for engaging the rigid U-shaped channel. The retractable tabs can partially extend through at least one of the plurality of openings in the rigid U-shaped channel. The balance shoe can be further secured to the rigid U-shaped channel with a fastener that interfaces with a frame pocket in the balance shoe. The cam can include at least one camming surface and a keyhole opening for receiving a pivot bar attached to a window sash. The cam is at least partially housed within the frame and is disposed within a space enclosed by the locking member. Upon rotating the cam with the pivot bar, the locking member engages the window jamb. In one embodiment, the locking member includes two opposing ends integrally connected by a spring member. The cam is located within a space between the opposing ends of the locking member, and upon rotating the cam with the pivot bar, the opposing ends engage the window jamb. In another embodiment, the locking member includes a plate, which is parallel to a back surface of the frame. The cam is located within a space between the plate and the frame such that rotating the cam with the pivot bar forces the plate to engage the window jamb.
In still another aspect, the invention relates to a method of installing an inverted window balance system within a window jamb in a window frame. The method includes four basic steps. The first step is to provide an inverted window balance system that includes a rigid U-shaped channel with a plurality of openings in the channel walls for securing the contents in the channel, an extension spring and a system of pulleys disposed within the rigid U-shaped channel, a cord to connect the extension spring via the system of pulleys with the window sash, and a balance shoe. The balance shoe includes a frame, a locking member located at least partially within the frame, a cam in communication with the locking member, and a connecting device for attaching the balance shoe within the rigid U-shaped channel. The frame of the balance shoe has a frame bottom surface, a frame front surface, and two frame edge surfaces. The second step is to insert the inverted window balance system into a jamb track of the window jamb, such that an axis extending along a longitudinal direction of the rigid U-shaped channel is perpendicular to a back wall of the jamb track and an axis that is perpendicular to the two frame edge surfaces is parallel to the back wall while the frame front surface faces a side wall of the jamb track. The third step is to rotate the window balance system within the jamb track 90 degrees about the axis extending along the longitudinal direction of the rigid U-shaped channel, such that the frame front surface faces in a downward direction. The final step is to rotate the window balance system 90 degrees about the axis that is perpendicular to the two frame edge surfaces, such that the frame bottom surface faces in the downward direction.
These and other features of the invention will be made apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. Also, the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.
Referring to
In the depicted embodiment, the connecting device 212 is a pair of retractable tabs that snap into the rigid U-shaped channel 630. In other embodiments, other connecting devices such as a screw, may be used to secure the frame 211 to the rigid U-shaped channel 630. A fastener 635 located in the inverted window balance 622 can be used to further secure the connection between the snap lock balance shoe 210 and the inverted window balance 622. To accommodate the fastener 635, the snap lock balance shoe 210 can form a connection pocket 213 sized to receive or mate with the fastener 635.
Another element of the snap lock balance shoe 210 visible in
In the embodiment shown in
Referring to
Referring to
An advantage of the type of balance shoe presently disclosed is that the snap lock balance shoe 210 is attached within the rigid U-shaped channel 630 resulting in a longer rigid U-shaped channel 630 than in the inverted balance systems 120 for a given window sash. The longer rigid U-shaped channel 630 of the inverted window balance 622 allows for the use of longer extension springs that provide greater control of the vertical positioning of the window sash than a shorter rigid U-shaped channel 130 with a shorter extension spring. Another advantage of the present invention is that the snap lock balance shoe 210 contains a smaller number of parts than prior art balance shoes 110.
One installation method used to place a snap lock inverted window balance system 600 within the jamb tracks 108 is schematically illustrated in the remaining figures. The snap lock inverted window balance system 600 includes one inverted window balance 622 and one snap lock window balance 210.
The installation method just described can be carried out in reverse to remove the snap lock inverted window balance system 600 from the jamb track 108 of the window frame 102 to allow for easy replacement of the snap lock balance shoe 210 or the snap lock inverted window balance system 600 itself. In order to replace inverted window balance systems 120 with prior art balance shoes 110, either the jamb tracks 108 need to be warped or completely removed in order to replace the prior art balance shoe 110 of the inverted window balance system 120.
While there have been described several embodiments of the invention, other variants and alternatives will be obvious to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments shown.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/654,120, filed Jan. 17, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,580,950 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/101,689, filed Apr. 8, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,562, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/862,950, filed Jun. 8, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,931,788, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/446,279, filed May 23, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,820,368, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/044,005, filed Jan. 11, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,000 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/261,501 entitled Snap Lock Balance Shoe and System for a Pivotable Window filed on Jan. 12, 2001, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
698168 | Barnum | Apr 1902 | A |
887968 | Selkirk | May 1908 | A |
1007212 | Lasersohn | Oct 1911 | A |
1312665 | Almquist | Aug 1919 | A |
2178533 | Viehweger | Oct 1939 | A |
2602958 | Brown | Jul 1952 | A |
2609191 | Foster | Sep 1952 | A |
2609193 | Foster | Sep 1952 | A |
2622267 | Peremi | Dec 1952 | A |
2635282 | Trammell, Sr. et al. | Apr 1953 | A |
2644193 | Anderberg | Jul 1953 | A |
2684499 | Lewis | Jul 1954 | A |
2732594 | Adams et al. | Jan 1956 | A |
2739344 | Dickinson | Mar 1956 | A |
2817872 | Foster | Dec 1957 | A |
2851721 | Decker et al. | Sep 1958 | A |
2873472 | Foster | Feb 1959 | A |
2952884 | Dinsmore | Sep 1960 | A |
3007194 | Griswold | Nov 1961 | A |
3105576 | Jones et al. | Oct 1963 | A |
3150420 | Brenner | Sep 1964 | A |
3184784 | Peters | May 1965 | A |
3364622 | Collard | Jan 1968 | A |
3434236 | Weidner et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3445964 | Foster | May 1969 | A |
3452480 | Foster | Jul 1969 | A |
3461608 | Johnson | Aug 1969 | A |
3475865 | Arnes | Nov 1969 | A |
3497999 | Hendra | Mar 1970 | A |
3529381 | Grossman | Sep 1970 | A |
3676956 | Taylor et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3732594 | Mills | May 1973 | A |
3820193 | Foster | Jun 1974 | A |
3844066 | Nobes | Oct 1974 | A |
3869754 | Foster | Mar 1975 | A |
3992751 | Foster et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4028849 | Anderson | Jun 1977 | A |
4068406 | Wood | Jan 1978 | A |
4079549 | Wood | Mar 1978 | A |
4089085 | Fitzgibbon | May 1978 | A |
4190930 | Prosser | Mar 1980 | A |
4227345 | Durham, Jr. | Oct 1980 | A |
4300316 | Ficurilli | Nov 1981 | A |
4332054 | Paist et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4364199 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4446654 | Schoolman et al. | May 1984 | A |
4452012 | Deal | Jun 1984 | A |
4506478 | Anderson | Mar 1985 | A |
4510713 | Anderson | Apr 1985 | A |
4517766 | Haltof | May 1985 | A |
4555868 | Mancuso | Dec 1985 | A |
4570382 | Suess | Feb 1986 | A |
4571887 | Haltof | Feb 1986 | A |
4590708 | Campodonico | May 1986 | A |
4610108 | Marshik | Sep 1986 | A |
4642845 | Marshik | Feb 1987 | A |
4683676 | Sterner, Jr. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689850 | Flight | Sep 1987 | A |
4697304 | Overgard | Oct 1987 | A |
4704821 | Berndt | Nov 1987 | A |
4718194 | FitzGibbon et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4785581 | Abramson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4799333 | Westfall et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4837976 | Westfall et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4854077 | Rogers et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4885871 | Westfall et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4888915 | Goldenberg | Dec 1989 | A |
4914861 | May | Apr 1990 | A |
4922657 | Foss | May 1990 | A |
4930254 | Valentin | Jun 1990 | A |
4935987 | Sterner, Jr. | Jun 1990 | A |
4941285 | Westfall | Jul 1990 | A |
4949425 | Dodson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4953258 | Mennuto | Sep 1990 | A |
4958462 | Cross | Sep 1990 | A |
4961247 | Leitzel et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5035081 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036621 | Iwasaki | Aug 1991 | A |
5069001 | Makarowski | Dec 1991 | A |
5113922 | Christensen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119591 | Sterner, Jr. et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5119592 | Westfall et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127192 | Cross | Jul 1992 | A |
5140769 | Hickson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5157808 | Sterner, Jr. | Oct 1992 | A |
5189838 | Westfall | Mar 1993 | A |
5210976 | Cripps | May 1993 | A |
5232208 | Braid et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5251401 | Prete et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5301467 | Schmidt | Apr 1994 | A |
5353548 | Westfall | Oct 1994 | A |
5365638 | Braid et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371971 | Prete | Dec 1994 | A |
5377384 | Riegelman | Jan 1995 | A |
5383303 | Nakanishi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
D355262 | Chaney et al. | Feb 1995 | S |
5445364 | Tibbals, Jr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448858 | Briggs et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452495 | Briggs | Sep 1995 | A |
5463793 | Westfall | Nov 1995 | A |
5463795 | Carlson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5530991 | deNormand et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544450 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553903 | Prete et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566507 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572828 | Westfall | Nov 1996 | A |
5615452 | Habbersett | Apr 1997 | A |
5632117 | Prete et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632118 | Stark | May 1997 | A |
5661927 | Polowinczak et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669180 | Maier | Sep 1997 | A |
5697188 | Fullick et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699636 | Stark | Dec 1997 | A |
5704165 | Slocomb et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5737877 | Meunier et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5802767 | Slocomb et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806243 | Prete et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806900 | Bratcher et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5829196 | Maier | Nov 1998 | A |
5852854 | Pierrot et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855092 | Raap et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873199 | Meunier et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5924243 | Polowinczak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927013 | Slocomb et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5943822 | Slocomb et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5996283 | Maier | Dec 1999 | A |
6032417 | Jakus et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041475 | Nidelkoff | Mar 2000 | A |
6041476 | deNormand | Mar 2000 | A |
6041550 | Tix | Mar 2000 | A |
6058653 | Slocomb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6119398 | Yates, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
D434637 | Habeck et al. | Dec 2000 | S |
6155615 | Schultz | Dec 2000 | A |
6161335 | Beard et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178696 | Liang | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6226923 | Hicks et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6305126 | Hendrickson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6378169 | Batten et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393661 | Braid et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
D462258 | Meunier | Sep 2002 | S |
D464256 | Meunier | Oct 2002 | S |
6467128 | Damani | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470530 | Trunkle | Oct 2002 | B1 |
D467490 | Uken et al. | Dec 2002 | S |
6553620 | Guillemet et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6584644 | Braid et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606761 | Braid et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622342 | Annes et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6679000 | Uken et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6763550 | Regnier | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6820368 | Uken et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840011 | Thompson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6848148 | Braid et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6857228 | Kunz et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860066 | Kunz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6931788 | Uken et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6983513 | Pettit | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990710 | Kunz et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7076835 | Harold et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7143475 | Annes et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7191562 | Uken et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7552510 | Harold et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587787 | Pettit | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7673372 | Annes et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7703175 | Tuller | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735191 | Tuller | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7937809 | Tuller | May 2011 | B2 |
7945994 | Dallas et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7966770 | Kunz | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8074402 | Tuller | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8132290 | Liang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8181396 | Kunz | May 2012 | B1 |
8313310 | Uchikado | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8365356 | Robertson | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371068 | Kunz | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8424248 | Uken et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8505242 | Kunz | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8539642 | Baker | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8561260 | Baker et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8640383 | Kunz | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8813310 | Baker et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819896 | Kellum, III et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850745 | Sofianek | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8918979 | Baker | Dec 2014 | B2 |
RE45328 | Tuller | Jan 2015 | E |
8966822 | Sofianek et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003710 | Kellum, III et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9121209 | Baker et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9133656 | Steen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9458655 | deNormand | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9580950 | Uken et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20020053117 | Braid et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020092241 | Uken et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104189 | Braid et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129463 | Newman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030074764 | Pettit et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030192147 | Braid et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192257 | Uken et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030213096 | Annes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040006845 | Polowinczak et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040163209 | Pettit | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040216380 | Uken et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237256 | Lutfallah | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244158 | Awakura et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050055802 | Braid et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050178068 | Uken et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198775 | Pettit et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050229492 | Robertson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060086052 | Petta et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060207185 | Shuler et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070011846 | Braid et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070101654 | Robertson | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113479 | Uken et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20080047099 | Malek | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080120804 | Annes et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080178424 | Tuller | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080178425 | Tuller | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090188075 | Baker | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090260295 | Tuller | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100115854 | Uken et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110067314 | Baker | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110239402 | Steen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120297687 | Baker et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130283699 | Kellum, III et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130340349 | Baker | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140000172 | Sofianek | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140026490 | Baker et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140208653 | Sofianek et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208655 | Stoakes et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140259936 | DeNormand et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140331561 | Baker et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150167379 | Sofianek et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150361701 | Steen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150368952 | Baker et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170089109 | Steen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170145722 | Kellum, III | May 2017 | A1 |
20170370138 | Uken et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1155341 | Oct 1983 | CA |
2119506 | Oct 1994 | CA |
2382933 | Apr 2002 | CA |
2338403 | Apr 2006 | CA |
2596293 | Feb 2008 | CA |
2619267 | Jul 2008 | CA |
2619289 | Jul 2008 | CA |
2820240 | Jan 2014 | CA |
2836375 | Jul 2014 | CA |
4211695 | Oct 1992 | DE |
329996 | May 1930 | GB |
723056 | Feb 1955 | GB |
740223 | Nov 1955 | GB |
1505782 | Mar 1978 | GB |
2195691 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2236786 | Apr 1991 | GB |
2254875 | Oct 1992 | GB |
2276655 | Oct 1994 | GB |
2278626 | Dec 1994 | GB |
2280697 | Feb 1995 | GB |
2292168 | Feb 1996 | GB |
2295634 | Jun 1996 | GB |
56-171982 | Jan 1981 | JP |
03197785 | Aug 1991 | JP |
5-52273 | Jul 1993 | JP |
3025244 | Jun 1996 | JP |
63-3785 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2000283025 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2004293388 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005113907 | Apr 2005 | JP |
Entry |
---|
“Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 9,133,656 Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.510 et seq”, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/081,089, entitled Inverted Constant Force Window Balance for Tilt Sash, filed Feb. 26, 2016, 19 pgs. |
Balance Systems—BSI Amesbury Group, Inc. Crossbow Balance Advertisement dated Jun. 7, 1999 (3 pgs.). |
BSI Tilt Balance Systems, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., 1996-2001, 4 pgs. |
BSI's Hidden Advantage: It's as Easy as 1-2-3, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., 2001, 3 pgs. |
Response by Patent Owner to Office Action in EX-Parte Re-Examination Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 1.550(e) for co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 90/013,695, filed Aug. 23, 2016, 13 pages. |
Crossbow Balance! Another New Balance in BSI's Quiver, Balance Systems—BSI, Amesbury Group, Inc., Jun. 7, 1999, 2 pgs. |
Dakota Balance—Balances and Accessories brochure, May 2001, 2 pgs. |
DWM Door & Window Maker Magazine, “2004 Annual Buyers Guide”, vol. 5, Issue 3, Apr. 2004, 2 pgs. |
Ex-Parte Re-Examination Office Action for corresponding U.S. Re-Examination Application No. 90/013,695 dated Jun. 23, 2016, 8 pgs. |
Heinberg, “Latest Trends in Window and Door Hardware,” Shelter Magazine, Jul. 2001, cover and p. 11. |
PCT International Search Report, Written Opinion, and International Preliminary Report on Patentability (with 37 sheets of annexes) for PCT/US2011/024134; ISA/US, dated Feb. 9, 2011 (113 pages total). |
Photographs of the Crossbow Balance Component shown in C6 (7 views; 3 pgs). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2018/026500, dated Jun. 22, 2018, 13 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170211305 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60261501 | Jan 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11654120 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 15372198 | US | |
Parent | 11101689 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11654120 | US | |
Parent | 10862950 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11101689 | US | |
Parent | 10446279 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10862950 | US | |
Parent | 10044005 | Jan 2002 | US |
Child | 10446279 | US |