The present disclosure relates generally to operations performed and equipment utilized in conjunction with a subterranean well and, in an embodiment described herein, more particularly provides for sneak path elimination in diode multiplexed control of downhole well tools.
It is useful to be able to selectively actuate well tools in a subterranean well. For example, production flow from each of multiple zones of a reservoir can be individually regulated by using a remotely controllable choke for each respective zone. The chokes can be interconnected in a production tubing string so that, by varying the setting of each choke, the proportion of production flow entering the tubing string from each zone can be maintained or adjusted as desired.
Unfortunately, this concept is more complex in actual practice. In order to be able to individually actuate multiple downhole well tools, a relatively large number of wires, lines, etc. have to be installed and/or complex wireless telemetry and downhole power systems need to be utilized. Each of these scenarios involves use of relatively unreliable downhole electronics and/or the extending and sealing of many lines through bulkheads, packers, hangers, wellheads, etc.
Therefore, it will be appreciated that advancements in the art of remotely actuating downhole well tools are needed. Such advancements would preferably reduce the number of lines, wires, etc. installed, would preferably reduce or eliminate the need for downhole electronics, and would preferably prevent undesirable current draw.
In carrying out the principles of the present disclosure, systems and methods are provided which advance the art of downhole well tool control. One example is described below in which a relatively large number of well tools may be selectively actuated using a relatively small number of lines, wires, etc. Another example is described below in which a direction of current flow through a set of conductors is used to select which of two respective well tools is to be actuated. Yet another example is described below in which current flow is not permitted through unintended well tool control devices.
In one aspect, a system for selectively actuating from a remote location multiple downhole well tools in a well is provided. The system includes at least one control device for each of the well tools, such that a particular one of the well tools can be actuated when a respective control device is selected. Conductors are connected to the control devices, whereby each of the control devices can be selected by applying a predetermined voltage potential across a respective predetermined pair of the conductors. At least one lockout device is provided for each of the control devices, whereby the lockout devices prevent current from flowing through the respective control devices if the voltage potential across the respective predetermined pair of the conductors is less than a predetermined minimum.
In another aspect, a method of selectively actuating from a remote location multiple downhole well tools in a well is provided. The method includes the steps of: selecting a first one of the well tools for actuation by applying a predetermined minimum voltage potential to a first set of conductors in the well; and preventing actuation of a second one of the well tools when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is not applied across a second set of conductors in the well. At least one of the first set of conductors is the same as at least one of the second set of conductors.
In yet another aspect, a system for selectively actuating from a remote location multiple downhole well tools in a well includes at least one control device for each of the well tools, such that a particular one of the well tools can be actuated when a respective control device is selected; conductors connected to the control devices, whereby each of the control devices can be selected by applying a predetermined voltage potential across a respective predetermined pair of the conductors; and at least one lockout device for each of the control devices, whereby each lockout device prevents a respective control device from being selected if the voltage potential across the respective predetermined pair of the conductors is less than a predetermined minimum.
One of the conductors may be a tubular string extending into the earth, or in effect “ground.”
These and other features, advantages, benefits and objects will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the detailed description of representative embodiments of the disclosure hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings, in which similar elements are indicated in the various figures using the same reference numbers.
It is to be understood that the various embodiments of the present disclosure described herein may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of the present disclosure. The embodiments are described merely as examples of useful applications of the principles of the disclosure, which is not limited to any specific details of these embodiments.
In the following description of the representative embodiments of the disclosure, directional terms, such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” etc., are used for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings. In general, “above,” “upper,” “upward” and similar terms refer to a direction toward the earth's surface along a wellbore, and “below,” “lower,” “downward” and similar terms refer to a direction away from the earth's surface along the wellbore.
Representatively illustrated in
The control system 10 as depicted in
Fluid communication between the zones 12a-e and the interior of the tubing string 20 is controlled by means of flow control devices 22a-e interconnected in the tubing string. The flow control devices 22a-e have respective actuators 24a-e for actuating the flow control devices open, closed or in a flow choking position between open and closed.
In this example, the control system 10 is hydraulically operated, and the actuators 24a-e are relatively simple piston-and-cylinder actuators. Each actuator 24a-e is connected to two hydraulic lines—a balance line 26 and a respective one of multiple control lines 28a-e. A pressure differential between the balance line 26 and the respective control line 28a-e is applied from a remote location (such as the earth's surface, a subsea wellhead, etc.) to displace the piston of the corresponding actuator 24a-e and thereby actuate the associated flow control device 22a-e, with the direction of displacement being dependent on the direction of the pressure differential.
There are many problems associated with the control system 10. One problem is that a relatively large number of lines 26, 28a-e are needed to control actuation of the devices 22a-e. These lines 26, 28a-e must extend through and be sealed off at the packers 18a-e, as well as at various bulkheads, hangers, wellhead, etc.
Another problem is that it is difficult to precisely control pressure differentials between lines extending perhaps a thousand or more meters into the earth. This can lead to improper or unwanted actuation of the devices 22a-e, as well as imprecise regulation of flow from the zones 12a-e.
Attempts have been made to solve these problems by using downhole electronic control modules for selectively actuating the devices 22a-e. However, these control modules include sensitive electronics which are frequently damaged by the hostile downhole environment (high temperature and pressure, etc.).
Furthermore, electrical power must be supplied to the electronics by specialized high temperature batteries, by downhole power generation or by wires which (like the lines 26, 28a-e) must extend through and be sealed at various places in the system. Signals to operate the control modules must be supplied via the wires or by wireless telemetry, which includes its own set of problems.
Thus, the use of downhole electronic control modules solves some problems of the control system 10, but introduces other problems. Likewise, mechanical and hydraulic solutions have been attempted, but most of these are complex, practically unworkable or failure-prone.
Turning now to
The well tool 32 in this example is depicted as including a flow control device 38 (such as a valve or choke), but other types or combinations of well tools may be selectively actuated using the principles of this disclosure, if desired. A sliding sleeve 34 is displaced upwardly or downwardly by an actuator 36 to open or close ports 40. The sleeve 34 can also be used to partially open the ports 40 and thereby variably restrict flow through the ports.
The actuator 36 includes an annular piston 42 which separates two chambers 44, 46. The chambers 44, 46 are connected to lines 48a,b via a control device 50. D.C. current flow in a set of electrical conductors 52a,b is used to select whether the well tool 32 is to be actuated in response to a pressure differential between the lines 48a,b.
In one example, the well tool 32 is selected for actuation by flowing current between the conductors 52a,b in a first direction 54a (in which case the chambers 44, 46 are connected to the lines 48a,b), but the well tool 32 is not selected for actuation when current flows between the conductors 52a,b in a second, opposite, direction 54b (in which case the chambers 44, 46 are isolated from the lines 48a,b). Various configurations of the control device 50 are described below for accomplishing this result. These control device 50 configurations are advantageous in that they do not require complex, sensitive or unreliable electronics or mechanisms, but are instead relatively simple, economical and reliable in operation.
The well tool 32 may be used in place of any or all of the flow control devices 22a-e and actuators 24a-e in the system 10 of
Note that the hydraulic lines 48a,b are representative of one type of fluid pressure source 48 which may be used in keeping with the principles of this disclosure. It should be understood that other fluid pressure sources (such as pressure within the tubing string 20, pressure in an annulus 56 between the tubing and casing strings 20, 16, pressure in an atmospheric or otherwise pressurized chamber, etc., may be used as fluid pressure sources in conjunction with the control device 50 for supplying pressure to the actuator 36 in other embodiments.
The conductors 52a,b comprise a set of conductors 52 through which current flows, and this current flow is used by the control device 50 to determine whether the associated well tool 32 is selected for actuation. Two conductors 52a,b are depicted in
The conductors 52a,b preferably extend to a remote location (such as the earth's surface, a subsea wellhead, another location in the well, etc.). For example, a surface power supply and multiplexing controller can be connected to the conductors 52a,b for flowing current in either direction 54a,b between the conductors.
In the examples described below, n conductors can be used to selectively control actuation of n*(n−1) well tools. The benefits of this arrangement quickly escalate as the number of well tools increases. For example, three conductors may be used to selectively actuate six well tools, and only one additional conductor is needed to selectively actuate twelve well tools.
Referring additionally now to
In this example, multiple control devices 50a-c are associated with respective multiple actuators 36a-c of multiple well tools 32a-c. It should be understood that any number of control devices, actuators and well tools may be used in keeping with the principles of this disclosure, and that these elements may be combined, if desired (for example, multiple control devices could be combined into a single device, a single well tool can include multiple functional well tools, an actuator and/or control device could be built into a well tool, etc.).
Each of the control devices 50a-c depicted in
The control device 50a responds to current flow through a certain set of the conductors 52. In this example, conductors 52a,b are connected to the control device 50a. When current flows in one direction through the conductors 52a,b, the control device 50a causes the actuator 36a to be operatively connected to the lines 48a,b, but when current flows in an opposite direction through the conductors, the control device causes the actuator to be operatively isolated from the lines.
As depicted in
When current flows in one direction through the conductors 52c,d, the control device 50b causes the actuator 36b to be operatively connected to the lines 48a,b, but when current flows in an opposite direction through the conductors, the control device causes the actuator to be operatively isolated from the lines. Similarly, when current flows in one direction through the conductors 52e,f, the control device 50c causes the actuator 36c to be operatively connected to the lines 48a,b, but when current flows in an opposite direction through the conductors, the control device causes the actuator to be operatively isolated from the lines.
However, it should be understood that multiple control devices are preferably, but not necessarily, connected to each set of conductors. By connecting multiple control devices to the same set of conductors, the advantages of a reduced number of conductors can be obtained, as explained more fully below.
The function of selecting a particular well tool 32a-c for actuation in response to current flow in a particular direction between certain conductors is provided by directional elements 62 of the control devices 50a-c. Various different types of directional elements 62 are described more fully below.
Referring additionally now to
As depicted in
The control devices 50a-f include respective solenoids 58a-f, spool valves 60a-f and directional elements 62a-f. In this example, the elements 62a-f are diodes. Although the solenoids 58a-f and diodes 62a-f are electrical components, they do not comprise complex or unreliable electronic circuitry, and suitable reliable high temperature solenoids and diodes are readily available.
A power supply 64 is used as a source of direct current. The power supply 64 could also be a source of alternating current and/or command and control signals, if desired. However, the system 30 as depicted in
The conductors 52 may also be used for telemetry, for example, to transmit and receive data and commands between the surface and downhole well tools, actuators, sensors, etc. This telemetry can be conveniently transmitted on the same conductors 52 as the electrical power supplied by the power supply 64.
The conductors 52 in this example comprise three conductors 52a-c. The conductors 52 are also arranged as three sets of conductors 52a,b 52b,c and 52a,c. Each set of conductors includes two conductors. Note that a set of conductors can share one or more individual conductors with another set of conductors.
Each conductor set is connected to two control devices. Thus, conductor set 52a,b is connected to each of control devices 50a,b, conductor set 52b,c is connected to each of control devices 50c,d, and conductor set 52a,c is connected to each of control devices 50e,f.
In this example, the tubing string 20 is part of the conductor 52c. Alternatively, or in addition, the casing string 16 or any other conductor can be used in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.
It will be appreciated from a careful consideration of the system 30 as depicted in
Similarly, current flow from conductor 52b to conductor 52c will provide electrical power to solenoid 58c via diode 62c, but oppositely directed current flow from conductor 52c to conductor 52b will provide electrical power to solenoid 58d via diode 62d. Diode 62c will prevent solenoid 58c from being powered due to current flow from conductor 52c to conductor 52b, and diode 62d will prevent solenoid 58d from being powered due to current flow from conductor 52b to conductor 52c.
Current flow from conductor 52a to conductor 52c will provide electrical power to solenoid 58e via diode 62e, but oppositely directed current flow from conductor 52c to conductor 52a will provide electrical power to solenoid 58f via diode 62f. Diode 62e will prevent solenoid 58e from being powered due to current flow from conductor 52c to conductor 52a, and diode 62f will prevent solenoid 58f from being powered due to current flow from conductor 52a to conductor 52c.
The direction of current flow between the conductors 52 is controlled by means of a switching device 66. The switching device 66 is interconnected between the power supply 64 and the conductors 52, but the power supply and switching device could be combined, or could be part of an overall control system, if desired.
Examples of different configurations of the switching device 66 are representatively illustrated in
Note that multiple well tools 32 may be selected for actuation at the same time. For example, multiple similarly configured control devices 50 could be wired in series or parallel to the same set of the conductors 52, or control devices connected to different sets of conductors could be operated at the same time by flowing current in appropriate directions through the sets of conductors.
In addition, note that fluid pressure to actuate the well tools 32 may be supplied by one of the lines 48, and another one of the lines (or another flow path, such as an interior of the tubing string 20 or the annulus 56) may be used to exhaust fluid from the actuators 36. An appropriately configured and connected spool valve can be used, so that the same one of the lines 48 can be used to supply fluid pressure to displace the pistons 42 of the actuators 36 in each direction.
Preferably, in each of the above-described embodiments, the fluid pressure source 48 is pressurized prior to flowing current through the selected set of conductors 52 to actuate a well tool 32. In this manner, actuation of the well tool 32 immediately follows the initiation of current flow in the set of conductors 52.
Referring additionally now to
However, there is another path for current flow between the conductors 52a,c. This current “sneak” path 70 is indicated by a dashed line in
Since the potential in this case is applied across two solenoids 58a,c in the sneak path 70, current flow through the control devices 50a,c will be only half of the current flow through the control device 50e intended for selection, and so the system 30 is still operable to select the control device 50e without also selecting the unintended control devices 50a,c. However, additional current is flowed through the conductors 52a,c in order to compensate for the current lost to the control devices 50a,c, and so it is preferred that current not flow through any unintended control devices when an intended control device is selected.
This is accomplished in various examples described below by preventing current flow through each of the control devices 50a-f if a voltage potential applied across the control device is less than a minimum level. In each of the examples depicted in
In
If at least the minimum voltage does not exist across the two of the conductors 52a-c to which the control device 50a-f is connected, the switch 78 will not close. Thus, current will not flow through the associated solenoid 58a-f, and the respective one of the control devices 50a-f will not be selected.
As in the example of
In
In
In
It may now be fully appreciated that the above disclosure provides several improvements to the art of selectively actuating downhole well tools. One such improvement is the elimination of unnecessary current draw by control devices which are not intended to be selected for actuation of their respective well tools.
The above disclosure provides a system 30 for selectively actuating from a remote location multiple downhole well tools 32 in a well. The system 30 includes at least one control device 50a-f for each of the well tools 32, such that a particular one of the well tools 32 can be actuated when a respective control device 50a-f is selected. Conductors 52 are connected to the control devices 50a-f, whereby each of the control devices 50a-f can be selected by applying a predetermined voltage potential across a respective predetermined pair of the conductors 52. At least one lockout device 72a-f is provided for each of the control devices 50a-f, whereby the lockout devices 72a-f prevent current from flowing through the respective control devices 50a-f if the voltage potential across the respective predetermined pair of the conductors 52 is less than a predetermined minimum.
Each of the lockout devices 72a-f may include a relay 74 with a switch 78. The relay 74 closes the switch 78, thereby permitting current flow through the respective control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
Each of the lockout devices 72a-f may include a thyristor 82. The thyristor 82 permits current flow from its source to is drain, thereby permitting current flow through the respective control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
Each of the lockout devices 72a-f may include a zener diode 80. Current flows through the zener diode 80, thereby permitting current flow through the respective control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
Each of the lockout devices 72a-f may include a transistor 84. The transistor 84 permits current flow from its source to is drain, thereby permitting current flow through the respective control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
Also described above is a method of selectively actuating from a remote location multiple downhole well tools 32 in a well. The method includes the steps of: selecting a first one of the well tools 32 for actuation by applying a predetermined minimum voltage potential to a first set of conductors 52a,c in the well; and preventing actuation of a second one of the well tools 32 when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is not applied across a second set of conductors in the well 52a,b or 52b,c. At least one of the first set of conductors 52a,c is the same as at least one of the second set of conductors 52a,b or 52b,c.
The selecting step may include permitting current flow through a control device 50a-f of the first well tool in response to the predetermined minimum voltage potential being applied across a lockout device 72a-f interconnected between the control device 50a-f and the first set of conductors 52a,c.
The current flow permitting step may include actuating a relay 74 of the lockout device 72a-f to thereby close a switch 78, thereby permitting current flow through the control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
The current flow permitting step may include permitting current flow from a source to a drain of a thyristor 82 of the lockout device 72a-f, thereby permitting current flow through the control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
The current flow permitting step may include permitting current flow through a zener diode 80 of the lockout device 72a-f, thereby permitting current flow through the control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
The current flow permitting step may include permitting current flow from a source to a drain of a transistor 84 of the lockout device 72a-f, thereby permitting current flow through the control device 50a-f when the predetermined minimum voltage potential is applied across the lockout device 72a-f.
The above disclosure also describes a system 30 for selectively actuating from a remote location multiple downhole well tools 32 in a well, in which the system 30 includes: at least one control device 50a-f for each of the well tools 32, such that a particular one of the well tools 32 can be actuated when a respective control device 50a-f is selected; conductors 52 connected to the control devices 50a-f, whereby each of the control devices 50a-f can be selected by applying a predetermined voltage potential across a respective predetermined pair of the conductors 52; and at least one lockout device 72a-f for each of the control devices 50a-f, whereby each lockout device 72a-f prevents a respective control device 50a-f from being selected if the voltage potential across the respective predetermined pair of the conductors 52 is less than a predetermined minimum.
Of course, a person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments of the disclosure, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to the specific embodiments, and such changes are contemplated by the principles of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of prior International Application Serial No. PCT/US08/75668, filed Sep. 9, 2008. This application also claims the benefit under 35 USC §119 of the filing date of International Application Serial No. PCT/US09/46363, filed Jun. 5, 2009. The entire disclosures of these prior applications are incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3327791 | Harrigan, Jr. | Jun 1967 | A |
3427580 | Brock | Feb 1969 | A |
3430712 | Stafford | Mar 1969 | A |
3565189 | Herbert | Feb 1971 | A |
3575650 | Fengler | Apr 1971 | A |
3717095 | Vann | Feb 1973 | A |
3906328 | Wenrich et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4138669 | Edison et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4279304 | Harper | Jul 1981 | A |
4303128 | Marr, Jr. | Dec 1981 | A |
4345650 | Wesley | Aug 1982 | A |
4364587 | Samford | Dec 1982 | A |
4396062 | Iskander | Aug 1983 | A |
4442903 | Schutt et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4467833 | Satterwhite et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4485780 | Price et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4495990 | Titus et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4526667 | Parkhurst et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4527636 | Bordon | Jul 1985 | A |
4570715 | Van Meurs et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4618197 | White | Oct 1986 | A |
4716960 | Eastlund et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4747451 | Adams, Jr. et al. | May 1988 | A |
4765184 | Delatorre | Aug 1988 | A |
4911239 | Winckler et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919201 | Bridges et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4921438 | Godfrey et al. | May 1990 | A |
4945995 | Tholance et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4967048 | Langston | Oct 1990 | A |
4984594 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5022485 | Mitchell | Jun 1991 | A |
RE33690 | Adams, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | E |
5058683 | Godfrey et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5099918 | Bridges et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5156220 | Forehand et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5166677 | Schoenberg | Nov 1992 | A |
5207273 | Cates et al. | May 1993 | A |
5251703 | Skinner | Oct 1993 | A |
5279363 | Schultz et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282508 | Ellingsen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5332035 | Schultz et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343963 | Bouldin et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5375658 | Schultz et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5516603 | Holcombe | May 1996 | A |
5547029 | Rubbo et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5839508 | Tubel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5868201 | Bussear et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5896076 | Van Namen | Apr 1999 | A |
6032733 | Ludwig et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6164375 | Carisella | Dec 2000 | A |
6176308 | Pearson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179052 | Purkis et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6247536 | Leismer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6315043 | Farrant et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315049 | Hickey et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6433991 | Deaton et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450263 | Schwendemann | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464011 | Tubel | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6470970 | Purkis et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6547010 | Hensley et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567013 | Purkis et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575237 | Purkis et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585051 | Purkis et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6668936 | Williamson, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6679332 | Vinegar et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6725925 | Al-Ramadhan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736213 | Bussear et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6782952 | Garay et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796213 | McKendree et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6812811 | Robison et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6912142 | Keim et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6958704 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967589 | Peters | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7007756 | Lerche et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011152 | Soelvik | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017662 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7038332 | Robison et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7040391 | Leuthen et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066261 | Vicente et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7145471 | Purkis et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147182 | Flanigan | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7322409 | Wittle et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7440283 | Rafie | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7468890 | Lin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7520321 | Hiron et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
20010037884 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020014338 | Purkis et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020050354 | Schultz et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030048197 | Purkis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051881 | Vinegar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030131990 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20100059233 | Smithson | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100236790 | Smithson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100237698 | Smithson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110067854 | Love et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004012040 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004081335 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2007116264 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2010030266 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010030422 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010030423 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued May 26, 2009, for International Application Serial No. PCT/US08/075668, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jul. 27, 2009, for International Application Serial No. PCT/US09/046363, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jul. 27, 2009, for International Application Serial No. PCT/US09/046404, 8 pages. |
Canadian Office Action issued Jul. 3, 2012 for CA Patent Application No. 2735384, 4 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued May 7, 2007, for International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US06/02304, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued May 26, 2009, for International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US08/75668, 11 pages. |
Lee Flosert Constant Flow Rate Product Brochure, Dec. 2002, 1 page. |
Office Action issued Jun. 24, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/626,033, 23 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jul. 27, 2009, for International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US09/46363, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jul. 27, 2009, for International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US09/46404, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/390,758, filed Feb. 23, 2009, 31 pages. |
Advisory Action issued May 14, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/555,451, 3 pages. |
Office Action issued May 21, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,402, 29 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Mar. 24, 2011, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/046363, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Mar. 24, 2011, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/075668, 6 pages. |
Australian Examiner's Report issued Apr. 17, 2011 for AU Patent Application No. 2009292150, 2 pages. |
International Preliminary report on Patentability issued Mar. 24, 2011, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US09/056339, 7 pages. |
Australian Office Action issued Feb. 4, 2010, for AU Patent Application Serial No. 2006336428, 2 pages. |
Canadian Office Action issued Nov. 18, 2009, for Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,637,326, 3 pages. |
Office Action issued Dec. 17, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/626,033, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Oct. 21, 2009, for International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US09/56339, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued Oct. 5, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/555,451, 23 pages. |
Office Action issued Mar. 7, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/555,451, 10 pages. |
Office Action issued Oct. 5, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/555,451, 23 pages. |
E&P Focus; “Access Technologies: Slider technology Improves Directional Drilling Efficiency”, National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy, dated Apr. 2007, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Jan. 4, 2012 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/021899, 2 pages. |
All About Circuits; “The Silicon-Controlled Rectifier”, Online article, www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol—3/chpt—75.html, dated 1999-2000, 12 pages. |
Kenneth Thomas, Bjorn Backlund, Orhan Toker, Bjorn Thorvaldsson; “The Bidirectional Control Thyristor”, dated 1999, 10 pages. |
Canadian Office Action issued Mar. 19, 2013 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,375,384, 2 pages. |
Office Action issued Jan. 24, 2013 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/792,240, 24 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100237698 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2008/075668 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 12792298 | US |