The present invention relates to a sniffing leak detector as well as methods for operating leak detectors of this kind.
Leak detectors with sniffing facilities are known (c.f., for example, DE-A 24 41 124 and DE-A 199 11 260). In the instance of sniffing leak detection, a unit under test containing a test gas is scanned with the aid of a sniffing tip. If a leak is present, test gas will escape to the outside. It is then supplied by the sniffing tip to a gas detector or gas sensor. The signals produced by the gas detector serve, among other things, the generation of alarm signals, preferably of the acoustic type. Frequently, helium serves as the test gas. Also a working gas present in any case within the unit under test may be employed as the test gas, in cooling facilities a halogen gas, for example.
It is the objective of the present invention to improve several aspects of a leak detector of the kind affected here, as well as the leak detection methods performed with such a leak detector.
In the instance of a leak detector of the typical kind, this objective is attained by equipping it with an acceleration sensor. This acceleration sensor may, for example, serve the purpose of letting the leak detector instrument enter the standby mode when not in use and “waking up” it upon use. An other possibility of employing the acceleration sensor is the suppression of interfering signals from a gas sensor being sensitive to movements.
While operating, sniffing leak detectors must not necessarily be operated by a keyboard. Therefore, previously, switching over of leak detectors to a standby mode was effected only manually. This type of switchover is inconvenient and is either forgotten by the user or deliberately not performed. By accommodating, in accordance with the present invention, an acceleration sensor in the sniffing facility at the connecting line, for example, or preferably in the handpiece, the instrument itself is capable of detecting whether the user is performing a sniffing leak detection process or if he has deposited the handpiece. With the handpiece deposited, the instrument automatically switches to the desired standby mode. The advantages of this mode—increased service life, energy-saving etc.—can be utilised.
It is especially expedient, when during the standby mode not the entire power supply voltage is switched off, but instead only the gas supply pump through which the measurement gas is taken in is switched off when the handpiece is not moved for a longer period of time. In this manner not only the service life of the pump but also that of the detection sensor system which is susceptible to contamination and the filters through which the measurement gas flows, can be increased. Since during the standby mode the sensor system and the electronics are not switched off, the leak detector will be immediately ready for operation as soon as the handpiece is moved once more.
In the instance of sniffing leak detectors it is known to accommodate the gas sensor in the handpiece itself, so as to attain short response times. This applies in particular to sniffing leak detectors which consist of the handpiece and a supply unit separated therefrom. The connecting line extending between the handpiece and the supply unit needs to be relatively long (5 m, for example), so that pumping of the measurement gas from the sniffing tip to the supply unit would take up a relatively long time. If the gas sensor is of the type being sensitive to movements (for example, an infrared sensor as it is known from DE-A-199 11 260), the movement of the handpiece causes interfering signals which may result in incorrect measurement results. By employing an acceleration sensor, such interfering signals can be detected and, for example, suppressed. This may be implemented in the simplest case, by interrupting the measurement signal line as soon as signals are produced by the movement sensor. Through these measures the process of sniffing leak detection is rendered more simple and more reliable.
Further advantages and details of the present invention shall be explained with reference to the examples of embodiments depicted in drawings 1 to 5.
In the drawing
The solutions according to drawing
The gas sensor 11 is located in handpiece 2. The gas which is to be analysed for the presence of the test gas is sucked in with the aid of a supply pump 15 and supplied to the gas sensor 11 (dashed lines 13). In the solution in accordance with drawing
Also the supply pump 15 is linked in the instance of both embodiments with the block 14. Via this link the supply pump may be switched off and thus the leak detector switched to the desired standby mode when the handpiece has been deposited, and as long as the acceleration sensor does not supply any signals during a pre-selected period of time.
In the solution in accordance with drawing
With reference to the drawing
Drawing
In the instance of performing sniffing leak detection on a unit under test, locations where a leak is suspected (soldered joints, connections etc.) are scanned one after the other with the sniffing tip 5 of the handpiece 2. During this scanning phase the handpiece is moved relatively slowly. The signals delivered by the gas sensor are not impaired. The acceleration sensor provides no or only negligibly small signals. The signals delivered by the infrared light detector 23 shall not be suppressed. If a leak is present, the signals reaching the indicator 35 provide, preferably, the acoustic alarm.
When moving the sniffing tip 5 from one location suspected of having a leak to a different location or to its rest, the handpiece is commonly moved relatively fast. Alone the interfering signals supplied by the gas sensor which is sensitive to movements can cause an alarm although no leak was determined. Interfering signals of this magnitude shall be suppressed. In this it is expedient to define a limit value and to select this limit value depending on the sensitivity desired for the leak detection process. If, for example, it is demanded that in the instance of units under test all leaks exceeding 3 gram per year shall be indicated, then it will suffice to suppress only such interfering signals which would supply an indication exceeding 3 g/yr.
The simplest means of suppressing interfering signals is to switch these off. Drawing
In the solution in accordance with drawing
In the embodiment in accordance with drawing
Through the solution in accordance with drawing
If the acceleration sensor 16 supplies signals over a prolonged period of time, meaning that the switch 41 assumes the position indicated by the dashed line for a longer period of time, then it is expedient to let the simulated signals decay slowly, preferably at such a speed with which also the measurement signal indicator decays upon terminating a leak search. Block 44 being located between block 43 and the changeover switch 41, has the function of a timer logic suited for this purpose.
Circuit blocks having certain functions are depicted in the drawing
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 33 567 | Jul 2001 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/06986 | 6/25/2002 | WO | 00 | 5/21/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/008923 | 1/30/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3645127 | Mongodin et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
6075445 | McLoughlin et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085576 | Sunshine et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6179444 | Plesko | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6229301 | Bolli et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6411207 | Shaffer | Jun 2002 | B1 |
20020058459 | Holt | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
24 41 124 | Mar 1976 | DE |
32 47 975 | Jun 1984 | DE |
38 01 893 | Feb 1989 | DE |
199 11 260 | Sep 2000 | DE |
1 489 953 | Oct 1977 | GB |
2 072 852 | Oct 1981 | GB |
62025229 | Feb 1987 | JP |
0055603 | Sep 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040194533 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |