The invention relates to a sniffing leak detector for sucking in a gas to be analyzed.
A sniffing leak detector serves to analyze gas and is provided with a sniffing probe for sucking in the gas to be analyzed. The gas analysis is typically performed in a high vacuum using a mass spectrometer. In a mass-spectrometric gas analysis, air at atmospheric pressure (ambient air) is typically sucked in in the vicinity of a suspected leak in a test object. The test object is filled with a test gas such as hydrogen or helium, for example. The test gas pressure inside the test object is higher than the atmospheric pressure in the ambient environment so that the test gas escapes from a leak in the test object and gets into the air in the vicinity of the test object. The air sucked in by means of the sniffing probe is supplied, either in the main flow or the partial flow, into the high vacuum, where the partial pressure of the test gas (hydrogen or helium) is measured.
The detection limit of the sniffing leak detector for the test gas is a critical measure of the quality of measurement. The detection limit is the minimal detectable concentration of the test gas in the air sucked in. The lower the detection limit is, the more sensitive is the measuring system and the higher is the accuracy with which the proportion of test gas can be determined.
It is known to arrange a gas-permeable membrane in the gas inlet to the high vacuum of the mass spectrometer, through which membrane a part of the gas sucked in flows. The known membranes are sintered ceramics discs intended to prefer the comparatively light test gas helium or hydrogen and to let less of the heavier gas proportions pass. The known sintered ceramics discs are suited for a mass-spectrometric gas analysis with a direct gas inlet into the high vacuum of the mass spectrometer (total pressure <10−4 mbar). With a gas inlet into the prevacuum of the high vacuum pump, such as with a counterflow leak detector, the conductance is insufficient to create the required gas flow that is greater by approx. a factor of 100.
It is an object of the invention to improve the detection limit of a sniffing leak detector for mass-spectrometric gas analysis by providing for a sufficiently high, but still molecular conductance that prefers the entry of hydrogen into the air over the entry of heavier gases.
The sniffing leak detector of the present invention is defined by the features of claim 1.
In the sniffing leak detector of the present invention, the gas inlet to the mass spectrometer is effected through a membrane through which the gas sucked in flows, with the pore diameter of the membrane being smaller or equal to the free path of air at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. A pressure in a range from 950 hPa to 1050 hPa is considered to be atmospheric pressure. A temperature in a range from 15° C. to 25° C. is considered to be room temperature. According to the invention it has been found that pores with a diameter which corresponds at most to the free path of air at atmospheric pressure and room temperature, generate a molecular gas flow even at a relatively high pressure as prevails in front of the inlet membrane of a sniffing leak detector. The conductance for the light test gases hydrogen or helium is particularly high, while the conductance for the heavier gases, which are unwanted in the analysis, is low. This creates a molecular gas flow into the vacuum, which flow contains test gas and is not viscous, but in which the molecules move independently of each other and at different velocities. The light gases, among the test gases hydrogen and helium belong, move particularly fast, whereby their proportion is greater in the high vacuum than in the sucked-in gas flow, and the detection limit is thereby improved. With the previous sintered membrane technology, a certain enrichment would also be achieved, yet the gas flow let in would be so small that the detection limit would even be worse than in case of a direct inlet (e.g. via an orifice).
Thus, the invention is based on the idea to design the pore openings as small as possible and, preferably, to make their diameters as equal as possible. In this regard, it is particularly advantageous to provide as many pores as possible in order to allow the passage of a comparatively large gas quantity despite the small pore size.
Similar membranes are known from a different technical field—namely the ultra-filtration of macro-molecules in liquids—where they do not serve for the improvement of the detection limit of a sniffing leak detector, but for a defined filtering of macromolecules with high accuracy.
The pore diameter may for example be less than or equal to 20 nanometers (nm). The diameter of any pore should differ from the mean diameter of all pores by about 50% at most, preferably by about 20% at most, so that the pores are as similar in size as possible such that even with high pressure differences no unwanted, heavy gases will be passed.
In order to still allow a sufficiently large proportion of gas to pass, the surface ratio of all pores should be at least about 20% and preferably at least about 40% of the total membrane surface area. The surface ratio of all pores may be in a range from 25% to 50% of the membrane surface area.
The pore density should be as high as possible. Preferably, the membrane should have at least 20 and preferably at least 25 pores per square micrometer (μm2) of its surface area. The wall thickness between adjacent pores, i.e. the smallest distance between the edges of adjacent pores, should be as small as possible and be less than 100 nm and preferably less than 80 nm.
The disc thickness of the membrane should be less than 100 μm and preferably less than 50 μm and possibly only a few 10 μm or less so as to keep the length of the pores as short as possible.
It is particularly advantageous if the quotient of the mean diameter of all pores and the mean free path of the sucked-in gas (air) is greater than 0.5 at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. For the mean free path I and the pressure p of the sucked-in air, the following is true:
Ī·p=6.65·10−5 m·mbar (at 273.15 K)
from which a mean free path of
is obtained at about 1000 mbar.
With the sniffing leak detector of the present invention it is possible to generate the maximum high vacuum pressure of 10−4 mbar with the gas let in in counterflow via the prevacuum, which pressure provides the best possible detection limit in a mass-spectrometric gas analysis.
The features of the invention can be realized in a particularly simple and reliable manner in a nanoporous membrane of aluminum oxide.
The following is a detailed description of an embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings. In the Figures:
The mass-spectrometric sniffing leak detector 10 is a counterflow leak detector for light gases. The gas is introduced into the prevacuum of the vacuum pump 15, 16 and not into the high vacuum of the mass spectrometer 14. In doing so, the light proportion of the sucked-in gas preferably diffuses into the mass spectrometer 14. As a result, a large gas quantity can be sucked in in order to achieve a particularly high sensitivity, whereas the light gas is enriched via the membrane 18.
A microscopic detail of a top plan view of the surface of the membrane 18 is illustrated in
The surface ratio of all pores 20 with respect to the surface area of the membrane 18 is 50% so that, on the whole, half the membrane surface is designed to be gas-permeable.
Thus, the invention is based on the idea that the gas inlet is not constituted by an orifice with only one opening, but rather by a gas-porous membrane whose individual holes, at the pressure prevailing at the gas inlet, meet Knudsen's condition for molecular flows. The hole density is chosen so high that, despite the small pore size, such a quantity of gas is allowed to pass that the high vacuum pressure of 10−4 mbar can be obtained. In this regard, the physical law is used according to which, in a molecular gas flow, the gas proportions of a gas flow move independently of each other (molecularly) and each have a conductance of their own. Molecular conductances are inversely proportional to the square root of the molecular weight of the respective gas. Therefore, hydrogen has a significantly better conductance through a given opening than nitrogen and oxygen, as well as all other components of air.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2013 209 438.8 | May 2013 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/059845 | 5/14/2014 | WO | 00 |