1. Field of Invention
The present invention pertains to downhole flow control devices, and particularly to downhole flow control devices using a common control line as a pressure source for operation.
2. Related Art
In running intelligent completions into subterranean wells, there are often limitations on the number of control line penetrations that can be made at the wellhead, the tubing hanger, or, in some cases, the production packer.
Intelligent completions use various means to regulate flow control devices placed downhole to control production from various zones. Such flow control devices, valves, for example, can typically be fully open, partially open (choked), or fully closed. Using a plurality of such valves allows an operator to selectively receive or restrict production from different zones. A simple version of such a flow control device would typically have two control lines, one acting on either side of a piston. When multiple valves of that kind are run in the hole, the number of control lines required becomes a problem. For example, three valves would require six control lines.
There also exist single control line flow control devices that rely on energy stored in the downhole device, such as a charge of compressed gas (e.g., nitrogen spring) or a mechanical spring working in conjunction with either the annular or tubing pressure. Since downhole conditions may change over time, selection of the spring or nitrogen charge is critical and may limit the operational envelope of the flow control device. Various multiplexing schemes have been employed, but those typically require some complex scheme of valves to allow pressures at different levels to address one valve or another. A common return line has been proposed for simple, two position-type valves (i.e., open/close valves), but operation can be tricky as one must carefully assess the state of each valve to determine the proper pressure sequence to apply to the various control lines at surface.
The present invention provides for the operation of a downhole flow control device using a snorkel.
Advantages and other features of the invention will become apparent from the following description, drawings, and claims.
In operation, valve 12, for example, uses indexer 23 to advance the valve state (e.g., from partially open to fully open) one position each time sufficient pressure is applied to control line 18. Indexer 23 is moved by a piston (not shown) being driven by hydraulic pressure. To further advance the state position of the valve, the pressure in control line 18 is lowered and pressure is supplied to the backside of the piston to reset indexer 23. The resetting force may be reinforced by a spring force, as is known in the art. Pressure can then be applied to control line 18 again, driving the piston and thereby advancing indexer 23 and the valve state. Valves 14, 16 operate similarly via control lines 20, 22, respectively.
Snorkel 24 is in fluid communication with the backside of the piston in each valve 12, 14, 16. Hydraulic pressure in snorkel 24 provides a return force to each piston. If snorkel 24 terminates at its upper end at some level in the well, the fluid pressure in the well at that particular level serves as the source of the hydraulic pressure applied to the backside of each piston. The pressure at that particular level could be the ambient hydrostatic pressure, or it could be modified by changing the annular pressure at the surface using conventional methods. The fluid pressure in snorkel 24 establishes a reference pressure against which downhole tools may be operated.
In the embodiment of
In
Because high-pressure production zone 34 is at a higher pressure than low-pressure production zone 38, formation fluids from high-pressure production zone 34 need to be choked back so they may be introduced into tubing 40 at substantially the same pressure as that in low-pressure production zone 38. Equalizing the pressure reduces the possibility of cross-flow between the formations. Although only two production zones are discussed in this example, other production zones may be present and the scope of the present invention includes those additional zones.
Proportional controller 42 may take many forms. In the example shown in
The pressure from low-pressure production zone 38 is communicated to the second side of piston 44 by snorkel tube 24. Snorkel 24 is run through an isolation packer 46 separating zones 34, 38. Thus, the position of controller 42 is based on the differential pressure between high-pressure production zone 34 and low-pressure production zone 38. If formation pressures should change over time, controller 42 will automatically adjust to compensate and maintain the pressure balance.
Flow from low-pressure production zone 38 enters tubing 40 via second flow control device 36. Second flow control device 36 may be any of various conventional devices such as sliding sleeves, slotted pipe, or perforated pipe.
As in the embodiment of
Although only a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the exemplary embodiments without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures. Thus, although a nail and a screw may not be structural equivalents in that a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secure wooden parts together, whereas a screw employs a helical surface, in the environment of fastening wooden parts, a nail and a screw may be equivalent structures. It is the express intention of the applicant not to invoke 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 6 for any limitations of any of the claims herein, except for those in which the claim expressly uses the words ‘means for’ together with an associated function.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2307949 | Phillips | Jan 1943 | A |
3109376 | Massey | Nov 1963 | A |
3454029 | Fredd | Jul 1969 | A |
3847214 | Cushman | Nov 1974 | A |
3967647 | Young | Jul 1976 | A |
3993100 | Pollard et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4084613 | Peters | Apr 1978 | A |
4217934 | Peters | Aug 1980 | A |
4258786 | Lochte et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4402517 | Wood et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4437514 | Canalizo | Mar 1984 | A |
4524831 | Pringle | Jun 1985 | A |
4621695 | Pringle | Nov 1986 | A |
4660646 | Blizzard | Apr 1987 | A |
4660647 | Richart | Apr 1987 | A |
4745802 | Purfurst | May 1988 | A |
4770250 | Bridges et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4879900 | Gilbert | Nov 1989 | A |
5050681 | Skinner | Sep 1991 | A |
5058673 | Muller et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5230244 | Gilbert | Jul 1993 | A |
5323853 | Leismer et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5529126 | Edwards | Jun 1996 | A |
5826661 | Parker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832996 | Carmody et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5947205 | Shy | Sep 1999 | A |
5957207 | Schnatzmeyer | Sep 1999 | A |
5971004 | Pringle | Oct 1999 | A |
6012518 | Pringle et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6085845 | Patel et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6119783 | Parker et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6209636 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6302210 | Crow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328109 | Pringle et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6502640 | Rayssiguier et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523613 | Rayssiguier et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6691785 | Patel | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6866101 | Sloan | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7201226 | Gambier | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20020029890 | Patel | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020074129 | Moore | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20040050555 | Rayssiguier at al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060016593 | Gambier | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2509928 | Dec 2005 | CA |
199503 | Oct 1991 | EP |
2415213 | Dec 2005 | GB |
2002029205 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060162935 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |