This invention is a divisional application and, under 35 U.S.C. 121 or 365(c), it claims priority of parent application Ser. No. 13/779,720 which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/606,732 with the title, “Snow Deflector for Skis” filed on Mar. 5, 2012 and which is hereby incorporated by reference. Applicant claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Par 119(e)(i). The present invention relates to skis, more particularly to means for preventing snow accumulation on the top surfaces of skis.
Skis should be as light as possible to facilitate skiing. Modern technology has reduced their weight by using newly developed strong and light materials such as carbon fibers. Yet skis are often weighted down by snow that accumulates on their top surfaces. This weight can be a burden to skiers especially when they are climbing uphill. Special low friction coatings can be applied to the ski's top surfaces but these coatings are often insufficient to prevent snow build up especially in certain snow conditions.
One of the main reasons for the snow accumulation is that the top surfaces of skis are essentially horizontal. Yet we know from alpine architecture that one of the best methods for preventing snow accumulation on top of buildings is to construct A-shaped or convex roofs rather than flat horizontal roofs.
There is a need for an efficient lightweight method or device for preventing snow accumulation on top of skis.
Further features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention over the prior art will be more fully understood when considered with respect to the following detailed description and claims.
This invention is a snow deflector that prevents the accumulation of snow on the top surfaces of skis. It is essentially an elongated structure with a top surface which is convex (for example A-shaped or rounded) in the cross-sectional direction perpendicular to its long axis. It can be mounted either removably or permanently to the front surface of a ski. It is of great utility to skiers in lightening up the weight of the ski when they are climbing uphill or going cross-country.
Several implementations of this invention are presented. The first is a cable and fabric structure mounted on the front part of the skis between the front tip and the boot and between the two edges. The cable is attached tightly between the tip of the ski and the boot and the fabric is draped over it, giving the structure an A-shape. The second implementation comprises a solid foam body or hollow fiberglass or carbon fiber body, mounted in front of the ski bindings and elongated along the axis of the ski. Its top surface is round-convex. The third implementation is a solid foam body or hollow fiberglass or carbon fiber body, elongated along the axis of the ski. Its top surface is A-shaped-convex. The fourth implementation makes use of an A-shaped foldable frame to support fabric. The fifth implementation utilizes a fabric cover supported by triangular riggings snap-mounted on top of the ski and held in place by taut tension cables between the tip of the ski and an anchor mounted on the ski just in front of the bindings. Yet a sixth implementation makes use a rigid A shell attached to the ski by hook-and-loop fasteners.
The invention is depicted in the figures. It is comprised essentially of a structure which is elongated along the axis, and attached to the front of, the ski. The structure has a convex surface at the top, configured to deflect and prevent the accumulation of snow. The term convex is interpreted to include A-shapes as well as rounded surfaces.
Usage of the device. Typically the device would be removed for downhill skiing and put in place for climbing uphill or for cross country skiing. The cable and fabric construction of this embodiment makes the device easy to fold and carry.
Another embodiment is illustrated in
Yet another implementation is shown in
To further improve the performance of the invention, the convex structure can be coated with a low adhesion layer or wax thereby reducing the possibility that snow sticks to it.
A range of angles are possible for the A-shaped implementation. For example an angle of 120 degrees would be less obtrusive but would not deflect snow very well. An angle of 30 degrees would be very obtrusive but could deflect snow very well.
Yet another variation is shown in
The metal plate 17 is permanently affixed to the ski with reinforcing self-tapping screws and adhesive backing This plate has hook points to allow the three tension cables 1, 15 and 16 to be attached. There is one hooking point on the left side, and one on the right side to attach the left and right tension lines respectively. There is also one hooking point in the center to attach the primary tension line at the top of the ski deflector. The metal plate 17 eliminates the need for a ski boot attachment and allows the height of the deflector to be controlled by triangular frames of “rigging” 18 which support the fabric 5.
The rigging 18 forms a frame made of one or more triangulated pieces of tubing that reinforce the inside of the deflector. This frame is shown in greater detail in
The front end of the fabric 5 comprises a hood 12 that fits on the front tip of the ski. This hood is stretchable fitting at the ski tip to accommodate the widest possible range of ski tip shapes. It is also long enough to seal out snow penetration but not long enough to affect ski glide along the bottom of the ski. Typically it extends about 4-7 inches from the tip along the bottom of the ski.
Yet one more embodiment utilizes an inflatable construction. As shown in
Another embodiment is shown in
A sock 25 also of flexible material is used to secure the device to the top of the ski. A plastic rib 26 extending underneath the top edge from the plastic holds the sock 25 in place. Configuring the device with an elastic sock on the front/nose portion of the ski has the advantage of a universal fit to skis with different designs and shapes. The sock serves not only to hold the structure together but to deflect the snow as the ski travels through it.
While the above description contains many specificities, the reader should not construe these as limitations on the scope of the invention, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments thereof. Those skilled in the art will envision many other possible variations within its scope. Accordingly, the reader is requested to determine the scope of the invention by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, and not by the examples which have been given.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13779720 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 14749490 | US |