The invention relates to a snowboard or ski of the type indicated in the introduction to claim 1.
Snowboards/skis today are normally designed with a flat surface between the tips at the two ends. The sliding surface today is normally composed of a flat sole surface between the tips at the two ends. For steering, the board is edged and the weight is distributed over the board's sliding surface by adapting the camber.
From international patent application WO 99/46016 a snowboard is known with a sole wholly or partly divided into three sliding surfaces. In this application the sole is described with a substantially flat central portion with an increasing angle between the flat portion and a sloping sole portion as one approaches the tip. For several reasons this is not optimal for all applications.
Similarly, from Norwegian patent no. 301964 a ski is known with a sole wholly or partly divided into three sliding surfaces. In this patent the sole is described with a substantially flat portion with an increasing angle between the flat portion and the sloping base portion when moving towards the tips. On testing the known models of skis and snowboards, it has been found that they offer limited opportunities for adaptation to different surface conditions and for use on different types of surface.
Based on the above-mentioned prior art, therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a snowboard or ski which is better able to be adapted to the different conditions and the challenges this implies, as well as more reliable transitions when skiing on harder surfaces.
This is achieved with a snowboard/ski which is characterised by the features which will become apparent from the patent claims.
Since the examples of snowboards and skis described below have many features in common, for the sake of simplicity only the generic term board or snowboard is employed, except where the features are adapted for use on skis. The use of these terms is therefore not intended to be limiting. The object of the invention, which is to provide an improved snowboard/ski, is achieved by means of the special design of the sliding surfaces. In the middle the board is either completely flat (then the angle is 0) or the sliding surface with a steel edge will form a relatively small angle with each other when viewed in cross section and the lines are extended from the outermost sliding surfaces so that they intersect and it is the acute angle, which the outermost sole with one of the steel edges forms with the corresponding outermost sole on the opposite side, viewed in cross section, substantially increases forwards towards the board's widest portion at the transition to the tip. When we say that the angle increases, we mean here that an acute angle between the two outermost surfaces on each side is substantially increasing from the middle of the ski/snowboard towards each of the tips. The angle represented by the outermost sliding surfaces is the sum of all the angles, so that it can also be said that this sum substantially increases from the middle towards each of the tips.
Another way of achieving approximately the same functionality is to use at least two sliding surfaces which are straight in cross section, but where these straight parts of the sole, viewed in cross section, do not merge into one another, but there is a sole surface which is cambered in cross section between the straight sole surfaces.
A substantial potential for improvement has therefore been achieved by providing a ski or a snowboard with a cambered or curved middle surface, respectively a board with more than three sliding surfaces. A larger angle to the ground is therefore obtained with the steel edge than if only three surfaces are used. By using several sliding surfaces, the angle and width of the sliding surface can be optimised according to different conditions. There may, for example, be five sliding surfaces for the first 15 centimetres, followed by three sliding surfaces for the next 20 centimetres, subsequently a sliding surface in the middle, and then the rear part can be made symmetrical with the front part or the sliding surfaces may be varied according to experience in order to achieve the best dynamic in the conditions aimed for. In this way different applications can be optimised from performing in icy half-pipes to racing or for use in new snow. The basic profile for all kinds of snow conditions is at the front and rear, and therefore it is in the board's wide portions that the board has the greatest tendency to cut down into the snow when edged. Thus it is important that the board's outermost sliding surfaces form a substantially increasing angle with each other when moving from the middle of the board, viewed in the longitudinal direction, so that the sliding surface that cuts down into the snow always forms a smaller angle with the base in the board's wide portion compared with the angle with the base on the board's central portion.
It makes little difference to the concept whether the board/ski is symmetrical or not, either in relation to the longitudinal axis or the transversal axis. It may, for example, have five sliding surfaces in front, followed by three, subsequently a flat central portion and then only three sliding surfaces on the whole rear portion or vice versa.
For a snowboard that is to be used on rails, it is advantageous for the steel edges to be located slightly higher than the flat first sole portion between the bindings, thereby preventing the steel edge from being caught in uneven patches in the rail, causing the rider to fall forwards. An important adaptation to this need will therefore be to make a snowboard that has a certain angle between the secondary sole surfaces and the flat first sole portion and the middle, i.e. between the bindings on the snowboard or under the bindings on the ski. Here it may be advantageous to make the raised portions narrow, but in order to obtain sufficient height on the lateral edge, a relatively large angle may be used, considerably larger than that used at the transition to the tip. Even with a raised lateral edge there is a need for a certain amount of steering when riding on a flat surface. To achieve this, the secondary sole surface is allowed to level out when moving slightly forwards and backwards from this cross section, thereby obtaining steel edges there that are completely or almost in the same plane as the flat first sole portion. There is also a wish, however, to have the dynamic benefits obtained by letting the angle between the secondary sole surfaces increase when approaching the tips of the board. A snowboard is thereby obtained that has greater uplift in the lateral edge in the middle of the board than towards the bindings, where the board is either completely flat or almost flat across its entire width before increasing uplift to the lateral edges again towards the transition to the tips. There are boards where the steel edge between the bindings goes inwards and follows the transition between the flat portions and the sloping lateral areas. In the case of such boards the steel edge is not raised in the middle, but none the less a sloping lateral portion of the sole is used in the middle where the outer edge of these sloping lateral areas is raised.
For skis that are to be used on rails, it is advantageous for the steel edges to be located slightly higher than the flat first sole portion under the binding, thus preventing the steel edge from being caught in uneven portions in the rail, causing the rider to fall forwards. An important adaptation to this need will therefore be to make skis with a certain angle between the secondary sole surface and the flat first sole portion in the middle, i.e. under the bindings on the skis. There is also a need here for a certain amount of steering even when skiing on a flat surface. To achieve this, the secondary sole portion is allowed to level out when moving forwards and backwards from this transverse section, thereby giving steel edges which to a greater extent are in the same plane as the flat first sole portion approximately in the front edge and rear edge of the bindings. There is also a wish, however, to have the dynamic benefits obtained by letting the angle between the secondary sole surfaces increase when approaching the tip, possibly also the rear tip. Skis are thereby obtained that have a greater uplift in the lateral edges under the binding than in front of and behind the bindings, where the ski is either completely flat or almost flat across its entire width before increasing the uplift in the lateral edges again towards the transition to the tips. There are skis where the steel edge under the bindings goes inwards and follows the transition between the flat 1. sole portion and the sloping lateral areas. In the case of such skis the steel edges are not raised in the middle, but none the less a sloping lateral portion of the sole is used in the middle where the outer edge of these lateral areas is raised.
A second relevant snowboard embodiment is provided when the stiffening involved in the bindings is taken into consideration and a slightly larger angle is therefore incorporated between the flat part of the board and the secondary sliding surfaces in the area of the binding attachments.
A third relevant embodiment is for riding on icy surfaces where slight undulations are made in the sole, with the result that the steel edge digs down better into the icy surface. This means that alternately increasing and decreasing angles are obtained as one moves from the middle to the tips, or alternatively alternately increasing and decreasing raising of the steel edge as one moves from the middle towards the tip.
The invention will now be described in greater detail by means of embodiments which are illustrated in the drawings. Even though the invention applies to both snowboards and skis, the principle is most frequently illustrated in more snowboard-like drawings and only
All the figures on the left are shown viewed from the underside, for the invention relates to the geometry of the sliding surface. On the right are shown corresponding cross sections from the sole. For the sake of simplicity a board is illustrated with a sandwich construction on the upper side of the board, viewed in cross section and parallel to the underside. However, this is not necessary as the upper side of the board may be designed differently from the sliding surface. The main task in the engineering of the board's thickness and choice of material is to provide a certain stiffness and torsional rigidity, but this is not a feature that falls within the invention. It is particularly important to make the board flat on the top where the bindings are fastened.
The drawings are as follows:
a-f illustrate cross sections of the same ski with sole form for rails and auxiliary profile on the top over the secondary sole surfaces,
a illustrates the underside of a board that has five sliding surfaces in the transition to the tips, three sliding surfaces slightly closer to the middle and only one common sliding surface on the central portion, followed by three sliding surfaces and then five sliding surfaces at the rear.
a illustrates the underside of an asymmetrical board which has five sliding surfaces at one tip (in principle it is optional whether it is the front tip or rear tip), and then three sliding surfaces on the rest of the board.
a illustrates the underside of a board that has three sliding surfaces at one tip and a common sliding surface in the central portion, followed by three and then four sliding surfaces towards the other tip.
a illustrates the underside of a ski that has five sliding surfaces closest to the front tip, followed by three sliding surfaces as one approaches the binding attachments, and only one common sliding surface on the central portion and then three sliding surfaces on the rear part of the ski.
a illustrates the underside of a board with two sliding surfaces which are straight in cross section, nearest the steel edge and a curved sliding surface between them. Between the bindings the board is completely flat.
a illustrates the underside of a board with three sliding surfaces which are straight in cross section, but where there are additional curved sliding surfaces between the sliding surfaces that are straight in cross section, with the result that the board consists of three straight and two cambered sliding surfaces, viewed in cross section.
a illustrates the underside of a board that has four sliding surfaces asymmetrically about the longitudinal axis nearest the tips, followed by three sliding surfaces as one approaches the binding attachments and only one common sliding surface on the central portion. On the rear portion the board again has three sliding surfaces.
a illustrates the underside of a board that has five sliding surfaces in front, followed by three, subsequently one and then three sliding surfaces at the rear.
b illustrates an enlarged cross section A-A.
The figures with the sections on the right illustrate possible cross sections. The cross sections illustrate a snowboard specially adapted for running on rails with less risk of being caught in the middle since the edges are raised as shown in cross section M-M, the uplift towards D and N is then reduced, before increasing again from C and G with slightly more uplift in B and H and even more uplift in A and I.
The shape of the top affects the strength of the board and is of great importance, but is illustrated here only as flat, since in principle it may have a great many shapes within approximately the same functionality, and it can be used for adapting stiffness, torsional rigidity, etc.
As can be seen in
It is obvious that most types of known shapes for the top of the board may be combined with this invention. For example, it may be of interest to have a flat top on the board round the bindings, thus preventing the shape of the board from being influenced by the binding being mounted on the board. Since such snowboards and skis are difficult to sand, it is appropriate to provide longitudinal raised portions over the secondary sliding surfaces, thereby making it easier to use a standard sanding machine with guide wheel over the stone/sandpaper belt. Another advantage of such raised portions is that the guide wheel always has an optimal pressure distribution over the secondary lateral surfaces when the sole is sanded, provided the guide wheel presses over the raised portion on one side. This principle can then be taken a step further and an attachment device can be provided in the snowboard's or the ski's surface for a raised portion which is placed on one side only when the board/ski is to be sanded on that side and then the same profile is placed on the other side when the other side is to be sanded, removing the profile when the flat sole portion is to be sanded. These profiles will normally be supplied with the skis/board at the time of purchase.
The whole process may also be envisaged standardised, where the ski service department has these profiles in different lengths.
Ski service has bridges to place on the bindings. These bridges can be provided with raised portions on one side or the other. Alternatively, the profiles may be placed on the bridges. Easy-to-sand skis (and boards) with secondary sole surfaces are thereby obtained.
The invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiment, and many modifications will be possible within the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20060758 | Feb 2006 | NO | national |
20070873 | Feb 2007 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2007/000061 | 2/16/2007 | WO | 00 | 10/22/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/094690 | 8/23/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3326564 | Heuvel | Jun 1967 | A |
5018760 | Remondet | May 1991 | A |
5462304 | Nyman | Oct 1995 | A |
5511815 | Karlsen | Apr 1996 | A |
5876056 | Karlsen | Mar 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
24 03 944 | Aug 1975 | DE |
26 47 125 | Apr 1978 | DE |
87 05 677 | Aug 1988 | DE |
198 09 005 | Sep 1999 | DE |
100 12 155 | Dec 2001 | DE |
0 253 660 | Jan 1988 | EP |
1 338 312 | Aug 2003 | EP |
301964 | Jan 1998 | NO |
WO 9521662 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9842418 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9946016 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 03095040 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2006049508 | May 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090273162 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |