SNOWBOARD

Description

The present invention relates to a snowboard, consisting of a board on which two bindings are mounted on the surface of the board at a distance apart approximately corresponding to ⅓ of the length of the board. The board is provided with inwardly curved edge portions, the board having a greater width at both ends at the transition to the tips than at its narrowest point. The board is assumed to have a sliding surface with a 3-dimensional sole where the steel edges are lifted relative to the flat sole in a very particular manner, this then being combined with tips with a very special geometry and function. The invention is based on the combination of a snowboard with a 3-dimensional sole which wholly or partly has a tripartite sliding surface in the portion between the transition to the tips and the binding fastenings, in addition to which the board is equipped with an additional particular 3-dimensional geometry in the tips, altogether providing quite unique riding characteristics.

Today's snowboards are usually designed with a flat sole surface between the tips at the two ends. For manoeuvring, the board is edged and the weight is distributed from the two bindings on the steel edges between the two transitions to the tips.

From Norwegian patent application no. 981056 a snowboard is known which has a sole divided wholly or partly into three sliding surfaces. The object of this invention is to provide the best possible dynamic when riding the board on snow. However, it is apparent from the patent that the uplift does not increase substantially into the tip, nor does it have any other specially prescribed geometry in the tip than the phase-out of the tripartite geometry which is in the sliding surface.

The present invention is based on the desire to combine the properties of a snowboard which in the sliding surface towards the transition to the tips has an increasing uplift of the steel edges relative to a plane defined in the middle of the board, where the tip is designed so as to provide extra good functionality in deep snow and on soft surfaces in general. This is achieved by designing the tip in such a manner that it presses the snow under the board more efficiently, lifting it further up from the snow than an ordinary tip. When riding straight ahead, this is best accomplished by using what is called here a skate plate, where the skate plate is like an almost straight portion in the snowboard's tip, thus providing an extended tip at a moderate angle relative to the surface and thereby extremely careful treatment of the snow while keeping the tip above the snow. When turning, an improved uplift in the tip is achieved, by increasing the angle between the central sole surface and the lateral sole surface in the tip successively from the end of the sliding surface a few cm forwards in the tip, with the result that during edging the lateral sole surface lies substantially flatter against the snow in the tip than at the transition to the tip, thereby more efficiently pressing the snow under the snowboard and not to the side, thus causing the board to also glide better during turning. In order for this to provide the best possible effect, the upward curve in the lateral sole surface(s) will preferably be increased more rapidly in the tip than in the central sole surface.

A special use for the skate plate is achieved if the snowboard is to be used principally on rails and boxes in parks, but there is also a requirement to retain good riding characteristics for normal riding on the ground. The solution is therefore to integrate a plateau (skate plate) between the ordinary sliding surface (the central sole surface) and the front tip of the snowboard, the point being that when riding or snow, this plateau should function as part of the tip, while during active use of the plateau on rails and boxes and during so-called “buttering” it has a special function as contact surface against the ground when the tricks concerned normally involve use of the front part of the sliding surface.

This differs substantially from today's boards with reversed camber since the front portion is so clearly defined as a part of the nose when riding on snow and only acts as a part of the classic sliding surface when performing special tricks.

The skate plate is a part of a specially-designed tip which consists of a few cm in the longitudinal direction in front of the ordinary sliding surface (central sole surface) where the sole is curved slightly upwards, whereupon an approximately flat portion is provided over a certain length of the tip, with the result that the tip now turns upwards at a substantially uniform angle relative to the sliding surface, although in such a manner that the angle may be slightly varied, but it substantially provides a sole piece which is functionally approximately flat. This is followed by a short additional tip where the sole is curved upwards to that the angle to the sliding surface increases further. This almost flat portion is called a skate plate and forms a part of the tip when riding on snow, but for certain tricks it functions as a part of the ordinary sliding surface on normal snowboards.

This concept can best be employed with a certain degree of normal camber between a transition E and V in the snowboard. However, it may also be envisaged for use in combination with a snowboard without camber, or even reversed camber in this area.

The design of the tip in order to improve the riding characteristics when the board is flat, and the design of the tip in order to improve the riding characteristics when turning may be employed separately or in combination. In any case the invention assumes that these special functions in the tip are employed together with a dynamic geometrical three-dimensional design of the snowboard's sliding surface, where steel edges are given an essentially increasing uplift relative to the middle of the sliding surface, when viewed in cross section, towards the transition to the tip(s). A further improvement is thereby achieved in dynamic by employing the concept with a specific tripartite sliding surface. The improvements according to the invention are achieved by means of a combination of two or more of the following elements:

- Behind the transition to the tip a sliding surface is employed in the area E-V as described in Norwegian patent application no. 981056 or PCT/NO2006/000014, where in principle the sliding surface is divided into three parts with a flat, central sliding surface and raised sliding surfaces with raised steel edges on each side,
- Against the steel edge of the almost flat skate plate portion, when viewed in cross section, the concept is employed with trisection of the sole surface so that the skate plate portion consists of three parts, comprising a flat and fairly wide central part, and on both sides of the central part out towards the steel edges there are raised sole surfaces giving a geometry which ensures that the steel edges are located higher than the flat skate plate portion when viewed across the board.
- Because the tip with the skate plate is first given an extremely moderate upward curve and then a flat portion, the rest of the tip may advantageously be fairly short. To avoid this resulting in problems with a tip which is too small when edging in normal snow, a tripartite sliding surface may advantageously be employed in order to ensure a better tip function, thereby causing the snow to go under the sole and avoiding the edge of the tip cutting too far down into the snow. This is achieved by letting the raised sliding surfaces (lateral sole surfaces) out towards the edges turn progressively upwards from a transition E to C, thereby raising the steel edge relative to the skate plate, at any rate to approximately the middle of the tip.
- A tip which has to press as much snow as possible under the snowboard during turning should lie as flat as possible against the snow when the board is edged, when viewed in cross section, but with an upward curve forwards as a tip viewed in the longitudinal direction. Until the angle which the lateral sole surface in the tip forms with the central sole surface is equal to the angle at which the snowboard is tilted during turning, the tip's ability to lift the snowboard out of the snow during turning increases. Since the angle at which the rider tilts the snowboard varies greatly, this places certain limits on how many degrees it is optimal to curve the raised sliding surfaces (the lateral sole surfaces) upwards.
- The angle which the raised sliding surfaces (lateral sole surfaces) in the tip forms with the central sole surface cannot be increased too rapidly without creating too abrupt a break upwards in the tip, but this may be improved in two ways: either by combining with a skate plate in the central part of the tip (FIGS. 4 and 5 show two possible examples of this), or by beginning the upward curve to the tip slightly further in towards the middle of the lateral sole surface than in the central sole surface. FIGS. 9, 11 and 12 show possible examples of this, where the transitions F and U between the lateral sole surfaces 5 and 6 are located closer to the middle than the transitions E and V between the first sole surfaces 1 and 2.
- In order to optimise the tip's ability to lift the snowboard up from loose snow during turning, a wider lateral sole surface will increase this functionality. The part of the tip's sole surface, which contacts the snow at a smaller angle than the central sole surface does, increases with a wider lateral sole surface. FIGS. 11, 12 and 13 show examples of wider lateral sole surfaces.

Since there is no essential difference between the front and rear of most snowboards, the board will normally be provided with the same geometry at the front and rear, but without this being an absolute requirement. This type of tip may very well be envisaged in front combined with a sliding surface at the rear which transitions to a normal rear tip without any of the said geometries, and particularly in the case of more directional snowboards this kind of asymmetry is to be expected. Nor do the lines j, k and l, m need to be placed symmetrically about the longitudinal centre line of the board, as one stands asymmetrically on the board.

For use on rails the flat skate plate portion should be as wide as possible in order to achieve maximum stability, while the lateral sole surfaces must be wide enough for the steel edge to be raised slightly from the rail, thereby preventing the steel edge from being caught in any small rough patches in the rail. FIGS. 1, 3 and 7 exemplify this point.

The object of the present invention is to provide an improved snowboard specially adapted to achieve increased functionality in loose snow and on rails with a view to performing tricks, which in style and function derive their inspiration from skateboarding. A great many snowboard tricks are performed in low-lying country with a minimum of snow, which in addition is often wet and soft, with the result that lift is important. However, the improved lift described herein may also be employed in powder snow, but in this case the best variant is often to use a wider lateral sole surface than that which is considered optimal on rails and boxes. FIGS. 9-13 exemplify this point. The described functionality is achieved by a snowboard which is characterised by the features which appear in the patent claims.

The present invention solves this special challenge for snowboards by means of the special design of the tip. For using the snowboard flat against the surface, it is the placing of a skate plate as an intermediate piece between the ordinary sole and an additional front tip which provides both increased lift in loose snow as well as the extra functionality intended for use on rails and boxes. The skate plate may be considered to be a part of the tip when riding on snow, and as a functional part of the sole when performing tricks, in comparison with where corresponding tricks have their point of contact on normal snowboards, whether they have regular camber or reversed camber.

The present invention will now be described in greater detail by means of embodiments which are illustrated in the drawings. The cross sections show how this functions on snow, where the design of the tips contributes towards better lift and thereby greater speed. It is easy to understand that a wider central sole surface provides greater stability along or across pipes, which are a common type of rails, while it is only when sliding across the rail that a positive safety effect is obtained from the raised steel edges which thereby do not easily become caught in rough patches in the rail. The steel edges are raised because the lateral sliding surfaces and the tip's lateral sole surfaces are curved upwards relative to the central sole surface.

FIG. 1 illustrates a snowboard according to a first embodiment of the present invention, in which

- i) illustrates the snowboard viewed from the underside, where the snowboard is provided with a skate plate,
- ii) illustrates the snowboard from the side, where uplift in steel edges is shown in a somewhat exaggerated manner,
- iii) illustrates a cross section of the snowboard in different transitions, and
- iv) illustrates the angle between the tip's sole surfaces continued right up to the tip, where the snowboard is viewed from in front.

FIGS. 2-13 illustrate further details and embodiments of the snowboard according to FIG. 1.

FIG. 1 i) illustrates the underside of a snowboard with skate plate, where the transition between the central sole surfaces 1, 2, 3 and lateral sole surfaces 5, 6 is depicted by dotted line j, k, l, m. In an area 2 (the area between transitions D and E, F) the tip is curved slightly upwards. A skate plate 3 is marked as area 3, in which case the skate plate 3 extends substantially with a uniform upward gradient. The small front tip is marked by an area 4. Lateral sliding surfaces 5 are arranged along the primary sole surface 1 from transition F some distance in towards the middle of the snowboard (i.e. in towards area I). Outside the skate plate 3 secondary lateral areas 6 are arranged, and in this version we have chosen to let the width of the secondary lateral areas (the lateral sole surfaces) 6 be substantially narrower than the lateral sliding surfaces 5 in order to give the skate plate 3 a larger flat area. ii) shows the snowboard viewed from the side, and under the snowboard a straight line 8 is drawn for the surface, which may be snow, a box or rails. iii) shows a cross section of the snowboard, where it will be noted that steel edges 7 in the cross sections or transitions G, E, C and T, V, X are raised relative to the central portion, while the cross sections or transitions H, I, S depict a flat sole between the steel edges 7.

FIG. 2 i) illustrates the underside of a snowboard, where the raised lateral areas 56 are depicted with approximately constant width. There are secondary lateral areas 5 along the primary sole surface from transition H up to the tip, and correspondingly on the rear half of the board from transition S. Outside the skate plate 3 there are secondary lateral areas 6, and in this version we have chosen to let the secondary lateral areas 5, 6 form an essentially increasing angle with the central sole surfaces 1, 2, 3 all the way from transition H up to transition C, and correspondingly, but inverted on the rear half. This is best seen in the cross sections iii).

FIG. 3 i) illustrates the underside of a snowboard, where the transition between the central sole surface 1, 2, 3 and the transition to the secondary lateral areas 5, 6 is depicted by dotted line j, k, l, m. Here the skate plate 3 is slightly longer than in the two preceding examples. It should also be noted that the secondary lateral area 6 is continued round the tip, thereby forming the additional tip 4 in front of the skate plate 3 in a sliding transition from lateral area 6 to front tip 4. There are secondary lateral areas 5 along the primary sole surface 1 from transition E and a distance in towards the middle of the snowboard (i.e. in towards area I). Outside the skate plate 3 secondary lateral areas 6 are arranged, and in this version we have chosen to let the width of lateral area 6 be substantially narrower than lateral area 5 in order to provide the skate plate 3 with a larger flat area. In order to illustrate that it is not necessary to have symmetry at the front and rear, the secondary areas 5 outside the sliding surface are omitted on the rear half.

FIG. 4 i) illustrates the underside of a snowboard with a combination of skate plate 3 and an increasing angle from cross section or transition E to C, when viewed in cross section iii), between skate plate 3 and the tip's secondary lateral areas 6. The central sliding surface 1 extends all the way out to the steel edge 7 at transition H, where the sliding surface divides into right and left lateral sliding surface 5 on each side of the central sliding surface 1. From transition H the uplift in the steel edge 7 increases relative to the central sliding surface 1 cautiously accelerating up to transition E, wherefrom the uplift increases more rapidly up to transition C, and from transition C up to the point A the angle is adapted in order to achieve a decent rounding in the tip. The same principle is followed in the rear tip. The angles shown are somewhat exaggerated, but the intention is to demonstrate that with constant width in the lateral areas 5, 6, the angle will increase more rapidly per cm from transition E to C than from transition H to E.

FIG. 5 i) illustrates the underside of a snowboard with a combination of a fairly narrow skate plate 3 and a progressively increasing angle between the central sole surfaces 1, 2, 3 and the lateral sole surfaces 5, 6 forwards in the tip from transition E to C. By progressively increasing angle we refer, for example, to the case where the angle increases from 0-3 degrees from transition H-E before increasing from transition E to C by a further 2 degrees, to 5 degrees, on the shorter distance. From transition C to A a uniform uplift is maintained in the steel edge 7 in the forward direction, as illustrated from the front in iv).

FIG. 6 illustrates two different transitions between lateral area 6 and the front part of the tip 4. At transition B there is a fluent transition between the lateral area 6 and front tip 4, while on the rear part of the board transition Y defines the start of the upward curve of the rear part of the tip 4.

FIG. 7 illustrates a variant with additional lateral areas 5 all the way between transition E and V. In this case moderate uplift of the secondary areas 5 will normally be employed in some areas, in order to retain sufficient edge grip. The uplift in the lateral areas 5 between the bindings is so modest here that it is not shown viewed from the side ii). Skate plate 3 may be envisaged designed here as in all the previously illustrated versions, and a random version has been chosen.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment with additional lateral areas 5 in front of and behind the bindings, see the transitions G and T. The sole is then flat all the way between the steel edges 7 in the area of the bindings, see the transitions H and S, in order to also have normal edge grip there when the snowboard is run flat. Towards the middle of the snowboard there is a narrow, additional lateral area 5 whose function is to raise the steel edges 7 in order to prevent them from being caught in rough patches on rails or boxes, see cross section I.

FIG. 9 illustrates a snowboard according to the invention specially designed for improving lift during turning. The tips have fairly wide lateral sole surfaces 6 and there is a uniform curve upwards in the tip's central sole surface 2 without any skate plate. Viewed in cross section iii) the angle between the tip's central sole surface 2 and the tip's raised lateral sole surfaces 6 increases from the transition F forwards in the tip to approximately halfway up to the point C, and a corresponding process is illustrated in the rear tip (a snowboard of this kind may well be envisaged without any substantial rear tip, or without this functionality in the rear tip). In order to illustrate the increasing angle forwards in the tip, many cross sections are shown, which should only be regarded as examples of one of many ways of increasing the angle outwards from the transition F, U between sliding surface and tip. Left lateral sliding surface 5 is wider than right lateral sliding surface 5 in order to provide more lift on the heel side. This asymmetry is also included in the tips. The sharply increasing lift in the lateral sole surface already begins in transition F and U respectively, even though the tip in the central area begins in transition E and V respectively. The uplift measured in mm in the steel edges 7 relative to the lines j, k increases more rapidly from transition F to C than from transition H to F.

FIG. 10 illustrates a directional snowboard specially designed for improving lift during turning in loose snow. The board has extra wide lateral sole surfaces 5, 6 and a uniform curvature upwards in the tip's central sole surface 2. The transition E, F to the tip is the same between the central sole surfaces 1, 2 and the lateral sole surfaces 5, 6. The angle between the tip's central sole surface and the tip's raised lateral sole surfaces increases from the transition E, F forwards in the tip right to the edge at the front of the tip, with the result that the snowboard's edge in the tip appears with two breaks in the transition between central sole surface 2 and the lateral sole surfaces 6 viewed from in front iv). In this case the rear tip is short and benefits less from an accelerated upward curve of the lateral sole surface behind transition V, but the upward curve in transition V is kept constant backwards, with the result that the rear tip viewed from behind iv) also has two breaks in the upper edge. It is possible, however, to envisage anything from a symmetrically identical rear tip as front tip to more reduced rear tips with or without the special twisting of the lateral sole surfaces from the transition to the tip and outwards. The uplift measured in mm in the steel edges 7 relative to the lines j, k increases more rapidly from transition E to C than from transition H to E.

FIG. 11 illustrates a snowboard specially designed for improving lift during turning. At the front a design of the tip is illustrated where the central sole surface 2 is reduced to a kind of keel forwards in the tip. In order to illustrate the possibilities for variation, a slightly different design is shown behind with slanting transitions and where the central sole area between transition M and L is a slightly rounded keel. The uplift measured in mm in the steel edges 7 relative to the lines increases more rapidly from transition F to C than from transition H to F.

FIG. 12 illustrates a snowboard which has a central sliding surface defined by the flat portion between the bindings and the portion of the board which contacts the surface when the board is pressed against the surface so that the camber is pressed flat and central sliding surface 1 touches the ground from transition E to V. Viewed in cross section the transition between central sliding surface 1 and the secondary lateral sliding surfaces 5 is diffuse, or unclear since the transition is slow via a slight rounding of the central sliding surface 1 where there are lateral sliding surfaces 5. In such cases we define that portions located up to 0.5 mm above the ground when the longitudinal camber is depressed also belong to or are a part of the central sliding surface 1, while portions located more than 0.5 mm above the surface belong to or are a part of the lateral sliding surface 5. The lines j, k, l, m here mark the transition between the sole surfaces 1, 5 according to this definition. The slight curvature in the central sole 1 continues into the tip's central sole surface 2. The dynamic of the snowboard is improved if the sole portions 5 closest to the steel edges are as flat as possible viewed in cross section, and therefore a cross section of the lateral sole surfaces 5 is shown here as straight for the last 2-4 cm nearest the steel edges 7, but a slight curvature does not make such a great difference from the dynamic point of view. The lift measured in mm in the steel edges 7 is measured relative to the middle of the central sliding surface 1, 2 if it is slightly curved. The up lift in the steel edges 7 increases more rapidly from transition F to C than from transition H to F. On the rear half of the snowboard the width of the central sole surface decreases successively backwards as indicated by the lines l, m. The cross sections iii) show a somewhat exaggerated curvature in order for it to be visible on a drawing how this increases from transition H to C and from transition S to X.

FIG. 13 illustrates a snowboard specially designed for improving lift during turning. A design of the sliding surface is shown here where the width of the central sliding surface 1 is reduced to the point on a small break, thereby producing a splitting of the front part of the sliding surface into right and left lateral sliding surface 5 towards the transition E, F to the tip. This splitting continues in the tip, thereby providing a kind of keel forwards towards the point A. This is a directional snowboard, and therefore the same tip function is not required at the rear as at the front, in addition to which the width of the central sliding surface 1 is also almost half the board width towards the transition to the rear tip. The lift measured in mm in the steel edges 7 relative to the lines j, k increases more rapidly from transition E to C than from transition H to E.

The whole underside of a snowboard normally consists of a sole surface, which can be divided into front tip and rear tip and an intermediate sliding surface. Since the present invention assumes the use of a dynamic three-dimensional sliding surface, the sliding surface will be divided into central sliding surface 1 and lateral sliding surfaces 5. The lateral sliding surfaces transition to the tips, but are then described as lateral sole surfaces 6.

Designations in the figures:

- i. The underside, the sole of the snowboard illustrated by dotted lines in order to show smooth transitions between different portions
- ii. The snowboard viewed from the side. The uplift in the steel edge has to be slightly exaggerated here in order to make the point
- iii. Cross section of the snowboard, slightly enlarged relative to i).
- iv. On some snowboards the angle between the tip's sole surfaces is continued right up to the tip, and then the snowboard is viewed from in front in order to illustrate this variant.
- 1. Primary sliding surface (=central sliding surface)
- 2. Area where the sole/snowboard is curved upwards forming the central sole surface in the tip, possibly only the first part of the tip if this also consists of a skate plate 3
- 3. Skate plate, an almost level part of the central sole surface in the tip which always slants slightly upwards, viewed from the side.
- 4. Front, upwardly curved part of the front tip or correspondingly at the rear.
- 5. Lateral sliding surfaces between first sliding surface and steel edge 7
- 6. Lateral sole surfaces between the tip's central sole surface 2, 3, 4 and steel edge 7
- 7. Steel edges or other hard edges surrounding the snowboard's sole surfaces
- 8. The surface; a pipe (=a type of rail) or a box or the ground (the snow).
- A and Z: Line marking the point on the snowboard
- B. and Y: Cross section in the tip. In FIGS. 1-8 the line marks the transition between skate plate 3 and front (rear) part of the small tip 4
- C and X: Cross section in the tip
- D and W: Cross section in the tip. In FIGS. 1-8 the line marks the transition between skate plate 3 and the upwardly curved area 2
- E and V: Cross section marking the transition between the ordinary sliding surface 1 and the tip 2
- F and U: Cross section marking the transition between the ordinary lateral sliding surface and the accelerated uplift of the lateral sole surface outwards in the tip
- G and T: Cross section at a point between binding fastening and the transition to the tip
- H and S: Mark the point where the primary sliding surface extends right out to the steel edge
- I. Marks the middle of the board.

In all versions, the skate plate 3 is shown beginning at a line D (W) across the snowboard. There is room for variation here, since this line may also be slightly slanting without causing any substantial changes in the functionality of the skate plate 3, with the result that a slanting transition in D is also covered by the invention. The same applies in the transition B (Y). In the same way the lines j and k need not start at the same point on the right and left sides, even though symmetry of this kind is shown here. The same applies for the lines m and l.

Four tables are now set up illustrating the snowboard according to the present invention with examples of the uplift in the steel edges 7 relative to primary sole surface 1, 2, when viewed in cross section. Uplift and geometry are deliberately varied in order to demonstrate different possibilities within the scope of the invention.

TABLE 01

Cross Section

A
B
C
D
F
G
H

890
248
248
0
0
0.00

900
249
249
0
0
0.00

910
249
249
0
0
0.00

920
250
250
0
0
0.00
The base

930
250
250
0
0
0.00
is flat all

940
251
251
0
0
0.00
the way

950
251
251
0
0
0.00
between

960
252
252
0
0
0.00
steel edges

970
252
252
0
0
0.00

980
253
253
0
0
0.00

990
253
253
0
0
0.00

1000
254
254
0
0
0.00

1010
254
254
0
0
0.00

1020
255
255
0
0
0.00

1030
256
130
63
0.1
−0.10

1040
257
130
64
0.2
−0.10

1050
257
130
64
0.3
−0.10
Dynamically

1060
258
130
64
0.4
−0.10
shaped

1070
259
130
65
0.5
−0.10
secondary

1080
260
130
65
0.6
−0.10
base surface

1090
260
130
65
0.7
−0.10
in this area

1100
261
130
66
0.8
−0.10

1110
262
130
66
1.0
−0.20

1120
263
130
67
1.1
−0.10
Increased

1130
264
130
67
1.2
−0.10
uplift towards

1140
265
130
68
1.4
−0.20
transition to

1150
266
130
68
1.5
−0.10
the tip

1160
267
130
69
1.6
−0.10

1170
268
130
69
1.8
−0.20
secondary

1180
269
130
70
1.9
−0.10
base surface

1190
270
130
70
2.1
−0.20
is straight

1200
271
130
71
2.2
−0.10
seen in

1210
272
130
71
2.4
−0.20
cross section

1220
273
130
72
2.5
−0.10
in this area

1230
274
130
72
2.7
−0.20

1240
275
130
73
2.8
−0.10
F-line

1250
276
130
73
2.8
0.00

1260
277
150
64
2.8
0.00
Upbend

1270
278
170
54
2.8
0.00
radius of

1280
279
190
45
2.8
0.00
330 mm

1290
280
210
35
2.8
0.00
G-line

1300
281
231
25
2.8
0.00

1310
281
231
25
2.8
0.00

1320
282
232
25
2.8
0.00

1330
282
232
25
2.8
0.00

1340
282
232
25
2.8
0.00
Skate-plate

1350
282
232
25
2.8
0.00
150 mm

1360
282
232
25
2.8
0.00
long

1370
282
232
25
2.8
0.00

1380
281
231
25
2.8
0.00

1390
279
229
25
2.8
0.00

1400
276
226
25
2.8
0.00

1410
272
222
25
2.8
0.00

1420
267
217
25
2.8
0.00

1430
260
210
25
2.8
0.00
H-line

1440
253

1450
243

This special

Tail

1460
230

upbend of

80 mm long

1470
215

2.8 mm follows

1480
185

around

Upbend

1490
150

the tail

radius of

1500
80

250 mm

TABLE 1

One possible example of a directional snowboard 1620 mm long according to invention

Total width
Total width
Length E-I
Length I-V
Sidecut

at E (mm)
at I (mm)
(mm)
(mm)
radius.

305,0
250
660
600
7934

Uplift of

Calculated

Width of
Width of
steel edge(7)

Angle

Distance

the primary
each of the
relative
Steps of

between

from
Total width
sole (1,2)
secondary(5,6)
primary
steel edge

primary and

the tip
of the ski
surface
sole surfaces
sole(1,2)
uplift
Cross
secondary sole

(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
section
(degrees)

0
0
0

0

A

30
180
70
55
2,00

60
240
70
85
4,50
−2,50

90
270
70
100
7,00
−2,50

4,02

120
295
70
113
9,50
−2,50

4,85

150
302
70
116
11,00
−1,50
C
5,44

180
305
70
118
9,50
1,50
E
4,64

210
300
70
115
8,17
1,33
F
4,07

240
295
70
113
7,24
0,93

3,68

270
291
70
111
6,35
0,89

3,30

300
287
70
108
5,51
0,84

2,91

330
283
70
106
4,71
0,80

2,54

360
279
70
105
3,96
0,75
G
2,17

390
276
70
103
3,26
0,70

1,82

420
272
70
101
2,60
0,66

1,47

450
269
70
100
1,99
0,61

1,14

480
266
70
98
1,42
0,57

0,83

510
264
70
97
0,90
0,52

0,53

540
261
70
96
0,42
0,48

0,25

570
259
259
0
0
0,42
H

600
257
257
0
0

If each part

630
256
256
0
0

of the cross

660
254
254
0
0

section of

690
253
253
0
0

the ski's sole

720
252
252
0
0

were totally

750
251
251
0
0

straight, then

780
250
250
0
0

the angle

810
250
250
0
0

between

840
250
250
0
0

I
the primary

870
250
250
0
0

sole (1,2)

900
250
250
0
0

and the

930
251
251
0
0

secondary

960
252
252
0
0

sole (5,6)

990
253
253
0
0

would

1020
254
254
0
0

have these

1050
256
256
0
0

theoretical

1080
257
257
0
0

figures

1110
259
259
0
0

S

1140
261
90
86
0,34
−0,34

0,22

1170
264
90
87
0,72
−0,38

0,47

1200
266
90
88
1,13
−0,42

0,74

1230
269
90
90
1,59
−0,45

1,02

1260
272
90
91
2,08
−0,49

1,31

1290
276
90
93
2,61
−0,53

1,61

1320
279
90
95
3,17
−0,56
T
1,92

1350
283
90
96
3,77
−0,60

2,24

1380
287
90
98
4,41
−0,64

2,57

1410
291
90
101
5,08
−0,67

2,90

1440
295
90
103
5,79
−0,71

3,23

1470
300
90
105
6,54
−0,75
U,V
3,57

1500
300
90
105
7,50
−0,96
X
4,10

1530
290
90
100
7,00
0,50

4,02

1560
260
90
85
4,50
2,50

3,04

1590
190
90
50
2,00
2,50

2,29

1620
0
0
0
0
2,00
Z

TABLE 2

One possible example of a twin tip snowboard 1590 mm long according to invention

Total width
Total width
Length E-I
Length I-V
Sidecut

at E (mm)
at I (mm)
(mm)
(mm)
radius.

310.0
258
630
630
7646

Calculated

Angle

Uplift of

between

Width of
Width of
steel edge (7)

primary

Distance

the primary
each of the
relative
Steps of

and

from
Total width
sole (1, 2)
secondary (5, 6)
primary
steel edge

secondary

the tip
of the ski
surface
sole surfaces
sole (1, 2)
uplift
Cross
sole

(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
section
(degrees)

0
0
0

0

A

30
180
10
85
2.00
−2.00

60
240
20
110
4.00
−2.00

90
270
30
120
6.00
−2.00

2.87

120
295
40
128
8.00
−2.00

3.60

150
305
50
128
8.50
−0.50
C
3.82

180
310
60
125
7.50
1.00
E
3.44

210
305
70
118
6.45
1.05
F
3.15

240
301
80
110
5.76
0.69

3.00

270
296
90
103
5.11
0.66

2.84

300
292
100
96
4.49
0.62

2.68

330
288
110
89
3.90
0.58

2.51

360
285
120
82
3.36
0.55
G
2.34

390
281
130
76
2.84
0.51

2.16

420
278
140
69
2.37
0.48

1.97

450
275
150
62
1.92
0.44

1.77

480
272
160
56
1.52
0.41

1.55

510
270
170
50
1.15
0.37

1.32

540
268
180
44
0.81
0.34

1.06

570
266
190
38
0.51
0.30

600
264
200
32
0.25
0.26

If each part

630
262
262
0
0
0.25
H
of the cross

660
261
261
0
0

section of

690
260
260
0
0

the ski's sole

720
259
259
0
0

were totally

750
258
258
0
0

straight, then

780
258
258
0
0

the angle

810
258
258
0
0

between

840
258
258
0
0

I
the primary

870
258
258
0
0

sole (1, 2)

900
259
259
0
0

and the

930
260
260
0
0

secondary

960
261
261
0
0

sole (5, 6)

990
262
262
0
0

S
would

1020
264
190
37
0.25
−0.25

have these

1050
266
180
43
0.51
−0.26

theoretical

1080
268
170
49
0.81
−0.30

figures

1110
270
160
55
1.15
−0.34

1140
272
150
61
1.52
−0.37

1.42

1170
275
140
67
1.92
−0.41

1.63

1200
278
130
74
2.37
−0.44

1.83

1230
281
120
81
2.84
−0.48
T
2.02

1260
285
110
87
3.36
−0.51

2.21

1290
288
100
94
3.90
−0.55

2.38

1320
292
90
101
4.49
−0.58

2.55

1350
296
80
108
5.11
−0.62

2.71

1380
301
70
115
5.76
−0.66

2.87

1410
305
60
123
6.45
−0.69

3.02

1440
310
50
130
7.18
−0.73
U, V
3.17

1470
305
40
133
7.20
−0.02
X
3.12

1500
300
30
135
7.00
0.20

2.97

1530
290
20
135
4.50
2.50

1.91

1560
260
10
125
2.00
2.50

0.92

1590
0
0
0
0
2.50
Z

TABLE 3

One possible example of a skate plate snowboard 1530 mm long according to invention

Total width
Total width
Length E-I
Length I-V
Sidecut

at E (mm)
at I (mm)
(mm)
(mm)
radius.

300.0
252
615
615
7892

Calculated

Angle

Uplift of

between

Width of
Width of
steel edge (7)

primary

Distance

the primary
each of the
relative
Steps of

and

from
Total width
sole (1, 2)
secondary (5, 6)
primary
steel edge

secondary

the tip
of the ski
surface
sole surfaces
sole (1, 2, 3, 4)
uplift
Cross
sole

(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
section
(degrees)

0
0
0
0
0
0.00
A

30
180
170
5
0.31
−0.31

3.53

60
240
170
35
2.15
−1.85
B
3.53

90
280
170
55
3.38
−1.23

3.53

120
295
170
63
3.85
−0.47

3.53

150
300
170
65
4.00
−0.15
C
3.53

180
295
170
63
3.54
0.46

3.24

210
291
170
61
3.11
0.43

2.94

240
287
170
58
2.70
0.41
D
2.64

270
283
170
57
2.31
0.39

2.34

300
279
170
55
1.94
0.37
E, F
2.04

330
276
170
53
1.60
0.34

1.73

360
273
170
51
1.28
0.32

1.43

390
270
170
50
0.98
0.30
G
1.13

420
267
170
49
0.71
0.27

0.84

450
265
170
47
0.46
0.25

0.56

480
262
170
46
0.23
0.23

510
260
260
0
0
0.23
H
If each part

540
258
258
0
0

of the cross

570
257
257
0
0

section of

600
255
255
0
0

the ski's sole

630
254
254
0
0

were totally

660
253
253
0
0

straight, then

690
253
253
0
0

the angle

720
252
252
0
0

between

750
252
252
0
0

I
the primary

780
252
252
0
0

sole (1, 2)

810
252
252
0
0

and the

840
253
253
0
0

secondary

870
253
253
0
0

sole (5, 6)

900
254
254
0
0

would

930
255
255
0
0

have these

960
257
257
0
0

theoretical

990
258
258
0
0

figures

1020
260
260
0
0

1050
262
170
46
0.23
−0.23
S
0.29

1080
265
170
47
0.46
−0.23

0.56

1110
267
170
49
0.71
−0.25

0.84

1140
270
170
50
0.98
−0.27
T
1.13

1170
273
170
51
1.28
−0.30

1.43

1200
276
170
53
1.60
−0.32

1.73

1230
279
170
55
1.94
−0.34
U, V
2.04

1260
283
170
57
2.31
−0.37

2.34

1290
287
170
58
2.70
−0.39
W
2.64

1320
291
170
61
3.11
−0.41

2.94

1350
295
170
63
3.54
−0.43

3.24

1380
300
170
65
4.00
−0.46
X
3.53

1410
295
170
63
3.85
0.15

3.53

1440
280
170
55
3.38
0.47

3.53

1470
240
170
35
2.15
1.23
Y
3.53

1500
180
170
5
0.31
1.85

3.53

1530
0
0
0
0
0.31
Z

The angle between soles 3, 4 and 6 is here shown as constant from C to A, causing a double dip in the edge at the tip, as shown in FIG. 5 iv.

TABLE 4

One possible example of a twin tip snowboard 1500 mm long according to invention

Total width
Total width
Length E-I
Length I-V
Sidecut

at E (mm)
at I (mm)
(mm)
(mm)
radius.

296.0
249
600
570
7671

Calculated

Angle

Uplift of

between

Width of
Width of
steel edge (7)

primary

Distance

the primary
each of the
relative
Steps of

and

from
Total width
sole (1, 2)
secondary (5, 6)
primary
steel edge

secondary

the tip
of the ski
surface
sole surfaces
sole (1, 2)
uplift
Cross
sole

(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
section
(degrees)

0
0
0
0
0
0.00
A

30
180
90
45
1.00
−1.00

1.27

60
240
120
60
2.50
−1.50

2.39

90
280
140
70
4.00
−1.50

3.28

120
291
146
73
4.85
−0.85
C
3.82

150
296
148
74
4.30
0.55
E
3.33

180
291
146
73
3.60
0.70

2.83

210
287
144
72
2.91
0.69
F
2.32

240
283
141
71
2.49
0.41

2.02

270
279
140
70
2.11
0.39

1.73

300
275
138
69
1.74
0.36

1.45

330
272
136
68
1.40
0.34
G
1.18

360
269
134
67
1.08
0.32

0.92

390
266
133
66
0.79
0.29

0.68

420
263
132
66
0.52
0.27

0.45

450
261
130
65
0.27
0.25

0.24

480
259
259
0
0
0.27
H

510
257
257
0
0

If each part

540
255
255
0
0

of the cross

570
253
253
0
0

section of

600
252
252
0
0

the ski's sole

630
251
251
0
0

were totally

660
250
250
0
0

straight, then

690
249
249
0
0

the angle

720
249
249
0
0

between

750
249
249
0
0

I
the primary

780
249
249
0
0

sole (1, 2)

810
249
249
0
0

and the

840
250
250
0
0

secondary

870
251
251
0
0

sole (5, 6)

900
252
252
0
0

would

930
253
253
0
0

have these

960
255
255
0
0

theoretical

990
257
257
0
0

figures

1020
259
259
0
0

1050
261
130
65
0.27
−0.27
S
0.24

1080
263
132
66
0.52
−0.25

0.45

1110
266
133
66
0.79
−0.27

0.68

1140
269
134
67
1.08
−0.29

0.92

1170
272
136
68
1.40
−0.32

1.18

1200
275
138
69
1.74
−0.34
Y
1.45

1230
279
140
70
2.11
−0.36

1.73

1260
283
141
71
2.49
−0.39

2.02

1290
287
144
72
2.91
−0.41
U
2.32

1320
291
146
73
3.60
−0.69

2.83

1350
296
148
74
4.30
−0.70
V
3.33

1380
291
146
73
4.85
−0.55
X
3.82

1410
280
140
70
4.00
0.85

3.28

1440
240
120
60
2.50
1.50

2.39

1470
180
90
45
1.00
1.50

1.27

1500
0
0
0
0
1.00
Z

It is evident that most types of known shapes for the top of the board may be combined with this invention, which relates substantially to the geometry in the sole surfaces under the board. It may be mentioned that it might be of interest to have a flat top on the board round the bindings, thereby preventing the board's shape from being influenced by the bindings being mounted on the board. Different geometrical structures on the top of or internally in the board in order to increase or reduce stiffness and torsional rigidity may be adapted to suit the described geometry in the sole.

All the models illustrated here are reasonably symmetrical about a centre line drawn along the snowboard. Since a snowboard rider does not stand symmetrically on the board relative to this line, there is no reason to suppose that the ideal snowboard is symmetrical about this line. The functionality in the invention does not depend on such symmetry, with the result that the invention may equally well be implemented with considerable differences between the board's right and left sides.

Claims

1. A snowboard comprising a board for mounting two bindings on the board's surface at a distance apart approximately corresponding to approximately ⅓ of the board's length, where the board is provided with inwardly curved edge portions, the board having greater width at both ends at the transition (E, V) to the tips than at the middle (I), wherein in the tip a skate plate is inserted, which during normal running on snow functions as a part of the tip, but which when performing certain tricks functions as a part of a central sliding surface, where the skate plate starts a few cm in front of the ordinary sliding surface, and where in an area (C) between the beginning of the skate plate and the end of the ordinary sliding surface (D) there is a shorter area where the sole surface is curved upwards, where the skate plate relative to the ordinary sole surface has an approximately straight form so that the skate plate's angle to the surface is essentially constantly rising over the skate plate, where the area (B) in front of the skate plate is curved further upwards in a front tip, with the result that the sole in the front tip creates an increasing angle with the surface again, viewed in the snowboard's longitudinal direction.
2. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein skate plate is used on the rear half of the snowboard according to the same principles as the front part, even though the design need not be identical.
3. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the skate plate is at least 4 cm long between transition (B, D), preferably over 8 cm and most preferred over 12 cm long.
4. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the sliding surface of the snowboard has a three-dimensional sliding surface which means that the lateral sliding surfaces and thereby also the steel edges towards the transition (E) to the tip have an increasing uplift relative to a plane defined by the central part of the sliding surface when it is pressed down against the ground, i.e. when the snowboard is lying flat and without camber, and then this geometry in the sliding surface is combined with a design of the tip(s) where the tip(s) has lateral sole surfaces which viewed in cross section gives steel edges which are raised relative to the middle portion of the tip and far advanced forward in the tip(s).
5. A snowboard according to claim 4, wherein the sliding surface of the snowboard has a three-dimensional sliding surface which is substantially tripartite, with a right lateral sliding surface, a central sliding surface and a left sliding surface towards the transition to the tips over a length which altogether at both the ends of the board forms at least 10% of the sliding surface's total length.
6. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the steel edges, viewed in cross section, create an increasing uplift relative to the central sole surface from the transition F between the secondary sliding surface and the tip's secondary sole surface to a cross line C located in front of F, where the uplift in C, measured in mm, is at least 25% greater than in F, preferably at least 35% and most preferred at least 50%.
7. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the steel edges, viewed in cross section, create an increasing uplift relative to the central sole surface from the transition E between central sliding surface and the tip's central sole surface to a cross line C located in front of E, where the uplift in C, measured in mm, is at least 10% greater than in E, preferably at least 15% and most preferred at least 20%.
8. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the steel edges, viewed in cross section, create an increasing uplift relative to the central sole surface from the transition between sliding surface and tip and a few cm outwards in the tip, with the result that the uplift increases at least 1% of the lateral sole surface's width, and preferably more than 2% from the transition (F) until maximum uplift in the steel edge is achieved in C.
9. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the tips' lateral surfaces start further in towards the board's bindings than the transition between the central sliding surface and the tip's central sole surface does in F and possibly U, so that the accelerated upward curve in the steel edge already starts a few cm earlier than the upward curve to the tip from the central sliding surface in E and possibly in V.
10. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein a skate plate is inserted in the tip(s), starting a few cm in front of the ordinary sliding surface, and between the beginning of skate plate (D) and the end of the ordinary sliding surface (E) there is a shorter area where the sole surface is curved upwards, while skate plate has an approximately straight form relative to the ordinary sliding surface with the result that the angle of the tip with the surface is fairly constant in the skate plate. In front of the skate plate the tips are curved further upwards in a front tip, with the result that the sole in the front tip forms an increasing angle with the surface again, viewed in the board's longitudinal direction.
11. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the skate plate is at least 4 cm long between B and D, preferably over 8 cm and most preferred over 12 cm long.
12. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the area between D and E where the board is curved upwardly between the sliding surface and skate plate is a maximum of 15 cm long, preferably shorter than 10 cm long, and most preferred shorter than 5 cm long.
13. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein skate plate forms a mean angle of maximum 12 degrees with the sliding surface, preferably under 9 degrees and most preferred less than 6 degrees and more than 3 degrees.
14. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein the transition (D) to skate plate starts at least 10 cm in front of the normal position of the bindings, preferably at least 15 cm and most preferred at least 20 cm, and in a corresponding fashion behind the rear binding.
15. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein between the transitions to front tip E and rear tip V the snowboard is provided with additional sliding surfaces where the steel edges in the lateral sliding surfaces are located higher above the central sliding surface at E and possibly at V than in the middle I.
16. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein some of the transitions (B, C, D, E, F) between the different areas of the snowboard are not perpendicular to the board's longitudinal direction, nor are they located symmetrically about the longitudinal axis.
17. A snowboard according to claim 1, wherein it is only the front tip which has a special design, and an ordinary rear tip is employed, or even a small or no rear tip.

Priority Claims (2)

Number	Date	Country	Kind
20100817	Jun 2010	NO	national
20110815	Jun 2011	NO	national

PCT Information

Filing Document	Filing Date	Country	Kind	371c Date
PCT/NO2011/000164	6/7/2011	WO	00	2/14/2013

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

US Classifications

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (2)

PCT Information