BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments of the present snowmobile will now be discussed with reference to the drawings, where:
FIG. 1 shows a diagrammatical view of a conventional snowmobile suspension system in full rebound;
FIG. 2 shows a diagrammatical view of a conventional snowmobile suspension system in full jounce;
FIG. 3 shows the diagrammatical view of a conventional snowmobile suspension system according to FIG. 1 and 2, with a front load applied;
FIG. 4 shows the diagrammatical view of a conventional snowmobile suspension system according to FIG. 1 and 2, with a rear load applied
FIG. 5 shows a diagrammatical view of a conventional snowmobile front suspension system;
FIG. 6 shows a comparison curve of the prior art versus the improved suspend with a rear load;
FIG. 7 shows a comparison curve of the prior art versus the improved suspend with a front load;
FIG. 8 shows a diagrammatical perspective view of the suspension of the present invention;
FIG. 9 shows a diagrammatical plan view of the suspension of FIG. 8;
FIG. 10 shows a diagrammatical plan view of the suspension of the present invention at full rebound;
FIG. 11 shows a diagrammatical plan view of the suspension of the present invention at full jounce;
FIG. 12 shows a diagrammatical perspective view of an alternate suspension;
FIG. 13 shows a diagrammatical plan view of the suspension of the present invention retro-fit on an existing suspension;
FIG. 14 shows a diagrammatical plan view of another suspension of the present invention retro-fit on an existing suspension;
FIG. 15 shows a perspective view of the suspension of the present invention applied to a tunnel and to slide rails;
FIG. 16 shows a perspective view of the suspension of FIG. 16, with the chassis and tunnel removed;
FIG. 17 shows a plan view of the FIG. 16 embodiment;
FIG. 18 shows an enlarged perspective view of FIG. 16, showing the front suspension mounts;
FIG. 19 shows an enlarged view of the connection of the front suspension mounts of FIG. 18 to the slide rails;
FIG. 20 shows a partial sectional view of one driveshaft assembly;
FIG. 21 shows the driveshaft assembly of FIG. 20, partially disassembled;
FIG. 22 shows a partial sectional view of another possible driveshaft assembly;
FIG. 23 shows the driveshaft assembly of FIG. 22, partially disassembled;
FIG. 24 shows an enlarged perspective view of FIG. 16, showing the rear suspension mounts to the slide rails;
FIG. 25 shows an enlarged perspective view showing the pivotal sliding coupling connection of the rear suspension mounts to the slide rails;
FIG. 26 shows an enlarged perspective view of the rear deflector shield;
FIG. 27 shows an enlarged perspective view of the rear chassis of FIG. 15 removed;
FIG. 28 is a diagrammatical view shows the force vectors applied to the suspension system;
FIG. 29 is a perspective view of an alternate rear chassis removed;
FIG. 30 shows the rear chassis of FIG. 29 attached to a tunnel;
FIG. 31 shows the rear chassis of FIG. 30 with a seat mounting frame;
FIG. 32 shows a seat bun mounted on the seat frame of FIG. 31;
FIG. 33 shows an alternate tunnel mounted seat frame;
FIG. 34 shows a seat bun mounted on the seat frame of FIG. 33;
FIG. 35 is a diagrammatical illustration of the four-link geometry of the embodiment of FIGS. 15-17;
FIG. 36 shows the diagrammatical view of FIG. 35 with front loaded coupling;
FIG. 37 shows the diagrammatical view of FIG. 35 with rear loaded coupling;
FIG. 38 shows a comparison load vs. deflection curve of the prior art versus the improved suspension with a front load;
FIG. 39 shows a comparison load vs. deflection curve of the prior art versus the improved suspension with a rear load;
FIG. 40 shows a comparison curve of regressive versus progressive suspensions;
FIG. 41 shows progressive rates for three load cases;
FIGS. 42-44 are computer simulations of movement of the progressive rear suspension of the present invention;
FIGS. 45-48 are plots characterizing the general behavior of the suspension of the present invention, compared to the behavior of the Polaris IQ 440 suspension;
FIG. 49 compares the current front ride rate to a target front ride rate.
FIG. 50 compares the current center ride rate to a target center ride rate
FIG. 51 compares the current rear ride rate to a target rear ride rate.
FIGS. 52-60 show additional rear suspension embodiments of the present invention.