1. Field
This invention relates to snowmobile skis and in particular to snowmobile skis which are versatile, being useful on ice, hard-packed snow or in deep, powdery snow.
2. State of the Art
Snowmobile skis have undergone considerable evolution in recent years. Traditionally, metal skis had been utilized for decades until the recent development of plastic skis. Also, skis have gone from being essentially flat to having a curved or rocker shape as illustrated and claimed in various U.S. patents to Noble, namely, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,700,020, 6,012,728 and 6,267,392. The latter two patents also introduced the concept of having a plurality of keels and especially a tri-keel design wherein there is a central longitudinal keel, which is deeper than two outboard keels. The advantage of this triple keel design is that it permits the skis to be more versatile, giving traditional steering control on hard surfaces, for example, ice, via the central keel, and then in deeper snow where the outboard keels take over some of the function of the central keel in permitting easy, straight-ahead steering and providing better control in turns, especially in deeper snow.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,491,333, issued Jan. 1, 1985 to Warnke discloses a flat ski with flared flat running surface extensions to maximize ski flotation in deep snow. These flat wings are an extension of the ski running surface in that the margins of the ski are flared upward at an angle of 30° to 60° to the snow surface. The patent states that better lift is achieved in turns in deep snow without affecting the characteristics of the skis when run on hard-packed snow. The flared ski margins serve to increase the effective width of the skis.
Snowmobiles have a long extended track that tends to cause the snowmobile to proceed along the longitudinal axis of the track even in a turn. The long track is rapidly moving and it tends to propel the snowmobile straight ahead even when the skis are turned, thus there is a plowing action of the skis in turns. Skis having some vertical surface area, such as provided by the three keels, militate to some extent against the sideways or lateral motion of turned skis. The snowmobile steering mechanism is structured with a camber so that when the snowmobile skis are turned the skis tilt away from a flat, running aspect. The straight-ahead, plowing effect may be pronounced in deep snow at any speed where the snow is very powdery and light such as that found frequently in the western United States.
This invention relates to snowmobile skis that have one or more lateral wings extending along at least one lateral edge of the skis for a substantial length, preferably substantially coextensive with the length of the lower running surface of the ski. These wings generally do not extend around the tip of the ski. The wings may be planar in nature or the wings may have a longitudinal arcuate shape and also a lateral arcuate shape to form a compact curved wing to provide better flotation for the ski in deep snow and to resist side slippage during turns in the snow. The snowmobile skis to which these wings find greatest applicability are those that have outboard keels such as those illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,700,020, 6,012,728 and 6,267,392 B1 to Noble. The wings are at least partially elevated with respect to the conventional lower running surface of the skis and form a raised running surface, which provides additional lift or flotation in deep snow.
In the drawings, which illustrate what is currently considered to be the best mode for carrying out the invention:
In companion U.S. Pat. No. 6,991,056, issued Jan. 31, 2006, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference, skis are described that have a top side fin, which is substantially vertical and which has over-curved upper edges in preferred structures which form a lip and provide better flotation for the skis. In this application, the invention relates to skis having wings, which are an extension of the running surface of the ski although the wings do provide an elevated surface that is generally not in contact with the snow when the skis are running on a hard-packed surface. Planar-type wings described herein are preferably incorporated in skis with outboard keels while longitudinally arcuate wings may also be advantageously incorporated on skis with only a central keel.
Referring now to
As seen in
As can been seen in
A cross-sectional view of the prior art ski of Warnke is illustrated in
The upturned outboard wing of a Warnke ski during a turn may assist the ski in sliding sideways while the opposed wing of the inboard side of the ski also provides a sideways sliding surface. Warnke-type skis have not been commercially utilized for at least the last ten years and may never have been commercialized or at least ever became a significant product in the snowmobile industry.
In a preferred embodiment of the ski, the wing has a varying angle depending upon the longitudinal location on the ski of that portion of the wing. For example, the wing member 11 adjacent the area or region where the wing blends into the base of the tip 17 of the ski may be at an angle of only a few degrees with the angle of the wing increasing in steepness as it approaches the midpoint of the ski and then decreasing in steepness until at the tail of the ski the wing essentially is at a zero angle to a horizontal surface. As the steepness of the angle of the wing increases, the width of the wing preferably increases so that a substantially uniformly wide ski is constructed with the width being measured from the outer edge of one wing to the outer edge of another. Such a ski may be seen from
As can be seen from these figures, the wing starts at a very shallow angle and then increases in steepness until at about the midpoint of the ski the angle of the wing may be upwards of about 65° or even more if desired. This type of construction provides most of the resistance to side slippage and lift generally near the central portion of the ski so that the steering remains essentially neutral. The gradual increase of the angle of the wing permits the ski when running forward in an essentially straight direction to have the snow gradually introduced under the wing so that there are no abrupt edges or changes in conformity of the ski. Such a ski glides smoothly over the snow surface or through the snow if the skis are running in deeper snow.
A further shape of the wing is shown in
The inventive structure described herein provides good resistance to side slippage and also excellent flotation when the skis are running forward in a straight line through deep snow and also when the skis are being turned in deep snow. Also the structure does not provide any significant lateral extensions of the ski that interfere with the steering and running of the skis when on hard-packed surfaces. These skis have a lower running surface which is effective for running and steering on hard-packed surfaces and then additionally an upper running surface provided by the wing members, preferably of a concave configuration, which are generally elevated above hard-packed snow but interact with deeper snow to provide flotation and excellent steering characteristics for the ski.
The wing members, as described hereinabove, are especially effective when incorporated with skis that have outboard keels. However, the wing members which have a lateral over-curve and which have a generally arcuate shape longitudinally may be effectively used for skis without outboard keels.
Generally it is preferred that the forces upon a ski be balanced both during forward running and during turns. If the flotation of the ski is such that the tip of the ski rides high, then the ski has a steep angle when running forward and is pushing snow before it, which is an inefficient manner of running. Preferably, the skis in a forward running direction, are planing which is the situation when the ski is at essentially a zero angle or close to a zero angle longitudinally to a horizontal surface.
When skis are turned, if the lateral forces on the ski are not uniform, for example, if there is more lateral force at the front end of the ski, the ski will tend to cause the snowmobile to over-steer causing the turns to become too sharp, thereby risking overturning of the snowmobile. If the forces at the tail of the ski in a turn are laterally directed and unbalanced, i.e., are not equal to the forces on the front of the ski, then the steering can be very stiff and appropriately sharp turns may be difficult to make. Thus, in design and structure, the skis of this invention are generally configured so that the lateral forces and the lifting forces on the ski provided by the wings are at about their maximum near the central region of the ski and are otherwise balanced between the rear portion and forward portion of a ski.
In
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/962,601, filed Dec. 21, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,841,089, issued Nov. 30, 2010, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/251,974, filed Oct. 17, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,311,165, issued Dec. 25, 2007, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/176,172, filed Jun. 21, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,236, issued Oct. 18, 2005, which is related to application Ser. No. 10/177,393, also filed Jun. 21, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,991,056, issued Jan. 31, 2006, the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2593025 | Hanson et al. | Apr 1952 | A |
3289227 | Kelly, Jr. | Dec 1966 | A |
3580598 | de Pauw | May 1971 | A |
3675939 | Vik | Jul 1972 | A |
3870331 | Cryderman | Mar 1975 | A |
3871675 | Lund | Mar 1975 | A |
3968958 | Huchette et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4491333 | Warnke | Jan 1985 | A |
4705291 | Gauer | Nov 1987 | A |
4857025 | Brown et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5040818 | Metheny | Aug 1991 | A |
5135249 | Morris | Aug 1992 | A |
5145195 | Campbell et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5145201 | Metheny | Sep 1992 | A |
5242187 | Diard et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5244227 | Lacroix | Sep 1993 | A |
5303949 | Harper et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5344168 | Olson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5427401 | Liard | Jun 1995 | A |
5462304 | Nyman | Oct 1995 | A |
D366014 | Lindquist et al. | Jan 1996 | S |
D367018 | Bernat | Feb 1996 | S |
5599030 | Campbell et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5700020 | Noble | Dec 1997 | A |
5876056 | Karlsen | Mar 1999 | A |
D408759 | Chapdelaine | Apr 1999 | S |
6012728 | Noble | Jan 2000 | A |
6062585 | Hess | May 2000 | A |
6105979 | Desrochers | Aug 2000 | A |
6267392 | Noble | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345834 | Bianchini et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378889 | Moriyama et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6431561 | Hedlund | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6513612 | Moriyama et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520512 | Lachance | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6619676 | Cormican | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631912 | Metheny | Oct 2003 | B2 |
D484072 | Bruns | Dec 2003 | S |
6955236 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6991056 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
D514980 | Kukkonen | Feb 2006 | S |
D539189 | Huntimer et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
7311165 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311166 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
20020041080 | Moriyama et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020105166 | Lemieux | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030034619 | Bergstrom | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030111809 | Fireman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030234129 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040061296 | Metheny | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20080246237 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271303 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2378638 | Sep 2002 | CA |
2662610 | Dec 1991 | FR |
Entry |
---|
Letter dated Apr. 13, 2007, from Kevin W. Metheny, President/CEO of Ultimate Sports Inc. (USI) to Bradley B. Jensen of TraskBritt, regarding Infringement Analysis of USI Snowmobile Skis in relation to Starting Line Products Patents 6,955,236; 6,991,056 and Patent Pending Applications (3 pages). |
USI Ski Cross Sections from 1988 to 2007 (10 pages). |
Additional Facts Relating to Materials Submitted by Ultimate Sports Inc. (“USI”) Apr. 13, 2007 (1 page). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110042909 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11962601 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 12940706 | US | |
Parent | 11251974 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 11962601 | US | |
Parent | 10176172 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 11251974 | US |