This invention concerns snowshoes, especially molded plastic or composite snowshoes, and relates to improvements in the comfort and convenience of use of snowshoes.
Snowshoes are designed to provide enhanced flotation for a person walking over snow and ice surfaces, and to this end the snowshoes place on the user's foot a structure having a surface area larger than that of the foot. A snowshoe has larger dimensions in both length and width than a person's foot, and the lengthwise dimension is increased both forward of and behind the user's foot in order to keep a proper load balance on the snowshoe during use. Thus, the tail of a typical snowshoe extends substantially back from the heel of the user's foot. For this reason, walking with a snowshoe attached to the foot disrupts the normal gait of the user.
The snowshoe thus acts as a relatively long extension to the foot. Especially when considering this extension in the rearward direction, the portion of the user's gait where the heel of the foot would normally contact the ground, and the following motion of the user's foot and lower body extremities, are greatly affected. The extended length at the rear of the snowshoe comes into contact with the terrain surface earliest, and in a location far to the rear of the user's normal heel strike. The snowshoe then rotates about this rear point and produces unnatural rotation and leverage against the user's lower extremities during the portions of the gait cycle that follow, as the snowshoe rotates into full contact with the terrain.
It is an object of this invention to minimize the negative and unnatural effects presented by the presence of a snowshoe on a user's foot, and particularly to address issues associated with the extended length to the rear and the effects of the modified heel strike and subsequent gait-related motions.
The effect of a snowshoe on the natural gait of the user can be minimized by shortening the length of the snowshoe, particularly rear of the boot. This, however, has the negative effect of reducing the flotation area of the shoe, and as noted, proper load balance requires that the design include extensions both fore and aft of the user's foot.
Another approach that has been proposed has been to construct the tail of the snowshoe with an upwardly angled or curving shape. An example of this is a Tubbs snowshoe that can be seen on the website tubbssnowshoes.com. In this way the tail of the snowshoe is less disruptive to the gait of the user than in the case of relative flat tail portion of the same length. Although such an upward curve will somewhat decrease the flotation in this portion of the snowshoe, it will not have as negative an effect as shortening the snowshoe.
In the invention, the tail of the snowshoe is substantially more flexible than the central portion of the snowshoe. In this manner, the snowshoe tail deforms and bends during the heel strike portion of the gait, when the tail of the snowshoe first contacts the ground. With the heel portion bending and accommodating the gait in this way, the user is able to walk in a way that more approaches the user's normal gait without snowshoes. In addition and as another benefit, the flexibility and bending of the tail reduce the impact load associated with the heel strike portion of the gait, especially on relatively rigid terrain such as ice or crusted snow.
It is thus a primary object of the invention to provide a substantially more flexible tail in the snowshoe than typical of previous snowshoes, more flexible than the central portion of the snowshoe, so that the snowshoe tail will deform and bend during the heel strike portion of the gait, when the tail of the snowshoe contacts the ground. These and other objects, advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the following description of a preferred embodiment, considered along with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings,
In
The line 40 in
One model of TSL snowshoe will flex somewhat in the tail when nearly all a user's weight is pushed down through the heel, with the snowshoe generally in the configuration shown in
The flexible tail portion 20 may have a length, for example, of about five or six inches in a snowshoe having an overall length of 24 inches. Thus, it may be about 21%-25% of the length of the snowshoe; tail length preferably changes with snowshoe length. More broadly, the tail may occupy a length of about 20% to 30% of the overall snowshoe. The bendability of the tail section 20 can be expressed as a function of bending moment applied to the tail section. In a preferred embodiment the tail section will bend through an angle alpha of at least about 30° with the application of about 200-250 inch pounds (22.6-28.25 newton-meters) to the tail section. This would be the case, for example, if a force at the arrow 38 is about 40-50 pounds (for an approximately 180 pound person) and the tail section 20 is about five inches in length. Approximately commensurate with the above bending characteristics, the tail section should generally have a bending modulus in an approximate range as described above to perform in the manner desired.
The bendable tail section 20 allows deflection during the heel strike portion of the user's gait in a manner that reduces the effective length of the heel portion or rear deck of the snowshoe and reduces the impact forces associated with the heel strike against the snowshoe. This results in a lower moment exerting pressure on the user's knee. Walking with these snowshoes is more comfortable.
The flexibility of the tail section can be realized in several different ways. One way is to simply mold the tail section in a relatively thin dimension, e.g. approximately 3 mm to 4 mm, with no stiffening elements either integrally molded into the tail section or attached (such as metal rails) to that section. As another example, the softer tail section can be achieved by modifying structural elements molded into the snowshoe body design such that the flexural stiffness in the tail section is greatly reduced. For example, transverse grooves can be provided in sections of the tail structure having significant depth, thus flexibilizing these regions. Another way of forming the flexible tail section is to construct the tail section 20 from a more flexible material than the central section 26. This option requires either co-molding with different materials, or a separately molded tail section, attached mechanically to the central section, such as by mechanical fasteners, possibly with metal strips extending across the joint.
The stiffening rails 30 preferably are sinuous in shape, as best seen in
Also, a preferred embodiment of the snowshoe of the invention will have a nominal decking thickness of about 3.5 mm, and a maximum height of about 21 mm from bottom to top at side edges ridges or ribs 32, in the main body section where the height increases. These ribs preferably enter the tail section as shown, but the thickness of the ribs tapers to zero about midway back into the tail. The stiffness of the tail, i.e. resistance to bending, preferably is about 1300 lb-in2 to about 2000 lb-in2, at least at a point immediately behind the metal rails 30 which begins the tail section. Stiffness preferably lessens somewhat toward the end of the tail. The stiffness (as resistance to bending) of the tail is calculated as EI, where I is a function of dimension of an approximately rectangular cross section (basically bh3/12, with b and h representing base dimension and height dimension), in a fourth power (in4), and E is Young's modulus or modulus of elasticity of a material, in psi. With a molded deck formed of polypropylene of Young's modulus about 218,000 psi, for example, the stiffness EI at the forward end of the tail is about 1310 pound-in2. By comparison the TSL snowshoe mentioned above has a stiffness of about 6550 (essentially constant through the snowshoe length) and an MSR snowshoe has a deck stiffness of about 4200, including in the tail.
The steel rails 30 greatly stiffen the center region of the snowshoe. There, the stiffness is essentially the stiffness of the metal traction rails plus that of the molded deck material with its molded-in ribs. The stiffness of the molded deck, however, is much less than that of the rails.
The above described preferred embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of the invention, but not to limit its scope. Other embodiments and variations to these preferred embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3600829 | Violette | Aug 1971 | A |
4720927 | Abegg | Jan 1988 | A |
5459950 | Damm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5517773 | Forrest et al. | May 1996 | A |
5720120 | Smith | Feb 1998 | A |
6112436 | Quellais | Sep 2000 | A |
6195919 | Forrest et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
7937855 | Faber et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 903 914 | Jan 2008 | FR |
WO2006085003 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO2008000979 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100126046 A1 | May 2010 | US |