This invention concerns snowshoes, especially snowshoes of the type having a suspended boot binding allowing pivoting in a pitch direction, about a transverse axis.
Modern snowshoes typically consist of a binding to hold the user's foot and boot, a crampon or cleat on the underside of this binding to provide traction on snow and ice directly under the boot, and with the binding being on a rotational axis to allow the crampon and binding to rotate along a transverse (pitch) axis. The snowshoes also sometimes include a suspension system that allows the crampon binding assembly to rotate about a longitudinal (roll) axis, or to translate in the vertical direction, or a combination of both, while limiting rotation about a vertical (yaw) axis.
Attachment of such suspension systems to a snowshoe structure requires certain structural characteristics of the snowshoe to support the suspension. This has typically been achieved by using a tubular aluminum frame that extends around the periphery of the snowshoe, as in snowshoes of Atlas Snowshoe Company.
This tubular aluminum frame, while affording a weight effective way of providing the required structure, also has certain limitations in the traction characteristics it can achieve on certain ice or snow surfaces; the round section of the tubing is rather slippery on certain surfaces.
The current invention seeks to overcome these limitations in traction, by affording the structure required to provide binding and crampon suspension through the use of a tubular aluminum frame nose section that extends around a front portion of the periphery of the snowshoe and is capable of fully supporting the binding suspension. This nose section is combined with other configurations for the aft portions of the snowshoe, so that many variations are possible.
Many patents have described attaching a binding to a snowshoe either by mechanically fixing the binding to the snowshoe frame in a rigid type of attachment or by a suspended type of attachment. In both attachment methods different elements have been used to add traction features to the snowshoe. A suspended binding as described herein means one that is supported from a frame or arms using a flexible element which may be tensioned straps, pulling inwardly on the frame or arms as steps are taken in the snowshoe.
Atlas Snowshoe Company suspends a binding from a snowshoe frame in a way that allows the binding to have limited range of motion in two degrees of freedom along the transverse and longitudinal axes, i.e. in pitch and roll. For example, see Atlas U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,440,827 and 5,699,630. This type of suspension also allows the binding to have a limited range of motion in one degree of translation (up/down) in the vertical direction. The suspension of the binding, that is, the springing resistance of the frame to inward pulling by tensioned suspension straps, is supported by the full length of the snowshoe of the surrounding snowshoe frame members, which is a full-circuit peripheral structure. There are elements added to the snowshoe to provide traction while using the snowshoe to travel on different types of snow conditions. These traction elements are added to the snowshoe deck.
Tubbs Snowshoe Company also has a suspended, tensioned type of snowshoe binding attached to the surrounding snowshoe frame. This binding is also supported by the full length of the snowshoe and surrounding snowshoe frame members. The binding has limited range of motion in two degrees of rotation along the transverse and longitudinal axis. This binding can also have one degree of translation in the vertical direction. Traction elements attached to the snowshoe deck provide traction while using the snowshoe on different snow conditions. These are features of Tubbs Snowshoe Venture model snowshoe.
Tubbs Snowshoe Company has a binding which is rigidly attached to the snowshoe, as shown in U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0126046. In this example there is no peripheral snowshoe frame, but instead a plastic snowshoe deck that supports the binding. The binding can rotate in only one degree of freedom along the transverse axis and no degree of translation in any direction. There are elements formed into the plastic deck for traction and there are elements that are attached to the plastic deck to add traction while traveling on different types of snow conditions. The traction elements are placed toward the middle of the snowshoe and not at the outer edges of the snowshoe. This example does not having a suspended binding.
Mountain Safety Research has a snowshoe with a rigidly attached binding, as shown in U.S. Pub. No. 2004/0231200. The binding is rigidly supported by the surrounding snowshoe frame and has a limited range of motion in one degree of freedom along the pitch or transverse axis. The binding has no degree of translation in any direction. The binding is rigidly attached to a cross brace frame member that is attached to the surrounding snowshoe frame, which is essentially a thin metal rail. The snowshoe in this example does not add elements to provide traction while traveling on different types of snow conditions. Instead this snowshoe uses a type of snowshoe frame members that have bottom traction elements on the frame members. This is not a suspended binding.
Salomon U.S. Pat. No. 6,112,436 describes a snowshoe with a suspended binding. The binding is supported by the surrounding snowshoe deck and has a limited range of motion in two degrees of rotation along the transverse and longitudinal axis, provided by articulating mechanical links. The binding in this example has one degree of translation in the vertical direction. The traction elements in this example are provided on the peripheral bottom surfaces of the snowshoe's deck. The snowshoe does not have frame members of the type discussed above surrounding the binding, but is primarily a composite deck made from plastic materials. The support for the suspended binding is provided by the full length of the snowshoe.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,899 of Atlas Snowshoe Company describes a snowshoe assembled from multiple pieces, including molded plastic nose and tail pieces and a pair of rails extending between the nose and tail, forming left and right midsection components of the snowshoe. The snowshoe of that patent has a boot binding/cleat assembly afforded pitch rotation via a transverse pivot shaft. The binding is not suspended.
This invention includes a nose or front portion of a snowshoe frame used to support a suspended binding of a snowshoe where the binding has two degrees of rotation along the transverse and longitudinal axes and preferably one degree of vertical translation. Supporting the snowshoe's binding with the front portion of the snowshoe frame allows the remainder aft portions of the snowshoe to be constructed in different shapes and materials. The aft portion is connected to and non-integral with the snowshoe's front portion, and the two sections are of dissimilar cross section. An advantage of primarily supporting a snowshoe's binding with the snowshoe's front portion of the frame is that different types of aft sections can be attached to the nose section and can, for example, provide gripping interface between the snowshoe and ground surfaces including snow and ice.
It is an object of the invention to provide a versatile snowshoe design with a nose section that primarily supports a suspended binding, enabling different configurations and materials of aft sections to be secured to the nose section.
These and other objects, advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the following description of a preferred embodiment, considered along with the accompanying drawings.
All of the above binding suspension systems,
For adult snowshoes, for persons in a weight range of about eighty to three hundred pounds plus clothing and gear, the lateral inward pulling force the frame must support (in the present case, the nose section must support) is approximately in the range of thirty pounds to one hundred eighty pounds or somewhat higher. As one example within this range, a person weighing about two hundred pounds, on a binding suspended in the manner illustrated in
It is seen that the connection of the two rails 50 to the nose section 36 adds only minimally to the stiffness of the nose section itself, toward resisting the inward pulling from the binding suspension. Different aft sections and different forms of connection have different effects on strength and stiffness. In one embodiment the nose section preferably is of sufficient strength to fully support the suspension without any contribution from aft portions of the snowshoe. In other embodiments the nose section can be of lesser strength, relying on some contribution from the aft section.
Again, the nose section 80 has left and right arms 80a that suspend the snowshoe binding 86 with straps 42, in the same manner as in the above described embodiments. The nose section has characteristics and strength properties as described above. To the rear of the nose section, the plastic or composite aft section 82 is a molded component and is essentially rigid. Thus, if the arms 80a of the nose section 80 were to be rigidly connected to the aft section in a way that restricts or prevents inward movement of the arms under strap tensions, the binding suspension could not function as desired. The inability of the nose section to resiliently deform would make the suspension too stiff and unyielding.
Therefore, the relatively rigid aft section is connected to the nose section in a way that permits most of the nose section's resilience to be retained. This can be done in several different ways, but in the embodiment shown a pair of traction rails 86, each rigidly secured to the aft snowshoe section 82, have forward ends 88 that cantilever forward from the most forward rivet connection 90, about an inch to two inches to connections with the nose piece arms 80a. These rails 86 preferably are somewhat L-shaped in cross section and can be connected to the arms 80a by overlapping for several inches as shown, and bolted or riveted horizontally or vertically or both. A fairly extensive overlap can be made, e.g. about five or six inches, in order to provide traction elements in the region of the nose section, without entering into the up-tilted forward end 80b of the nose section.
Other forms of connection between nose and aft section can be used, and the nose piece can be secured to other types of aft sections.
The nose section described above could be of different material and somewhat different configuration. The nose can be a solid or laminate composite structure, such as a composite U-shaped resilient nose structure. This can be connected to distinctly different types of aft sections. The reference to a U-shaped nose defines a front end of the snowshoe and has arms extending aft for connection to the remainder of the snowshoe.
Reference to a snowshoe frame that includes an aft section is intended to include a solid or molded off section as the frame in that section.
The invention provides a snowshoe which is unique in being formed with very dissimilar cross sections, in the nose section and in the aft section, assembled together and with the snowshoe's binding suspended by the nose section. Previous suspended binding snowshoes have utilized the full length of a snowshoe frame, with integrally-extending left and right peripheral frame members, for the needed strength and resilience to support the suspended binding. In the invention the nose piece and aft section, each of which can have varying types of cross section, are separately formed and of dissimilar geometry and are assembled together by rivets, bolts or other fastening means.
The above described preferred embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of the invention, but not to limit its scope. Other embodiments and variations to these preferred embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3636643 | Lundquist | Jan 1972 | A |
4720927 | Abegg | Jan 1988 | A |
5440827 | Klebahn et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5699630 | Klebahn et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6006453 | Klebahn et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6112436 | Quellais | Sep 2000 | A |
6226899 | Klebahn et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6564478 | Wing et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6725576 | Emerson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
8020321 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8171658 | Samuels et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20040231200 | Forrest et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20080141564 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100126046 | Samuels et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110173844 | Samuels et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2792540 | Oct 2000 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120117827 A1 | May 2012 | US |