Patent Grant
11006692
This application is related to and claims priority benefits from German Patent Application No. DE 10 2014 202 432.3, filed on Feb. 11, 2014, entitled IMPROVED SOCCER SHOE (“the '432 application”). The '432 application is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.
The present invention relates to a shoe, in particular a soccer shoe.
A number of requirements are imposed on a soccer shoe, such as that the soccer shoe should be light, adjust to a wearer's foot in an optimal manner, and provide good control of the ball for the soccer player. While a lower-weight soccer shoe is of particularly great importance during fast sprints, a heavy soccer shoe is also impedimental and detrimental to precision when shooting a soccer ball. A soccer shoe that is well-adjusted to the shape of the foot provides the soccer player with the necessary support on the one hand and enables precise transmission of force to the ball during shooting on the other hand. Good control of the ball is especially important during technically ambitious play, such as e.g. dribbling. Soccer players for whom precisely guiding the ball has priority, such as midfielders, prefer soccer shoes that allow the most direct and immediate contact possible with the ball.
These varied requirements imposed on a soccer shoe can be difficult to realize simultaneously. For example, reduction of a soccer shoe's weight usually results in the soccer shoe providing the soccer player with less support since the lighter weight is typically achieved by dispensing with material that would otherwise support the foot and ensure a firm coupling of the soccer shoe to the foot. In addition, allowing the most direct and immediate contact with the ball possible for the soccer player is typically realized by a correspondingly thin material of the shoe upper, which is detrimental to stability and a firm fit. Thus, there is tension between the various requirements imposed on a soccer shoe, which means that the known solutions to date typically meet certain requirements, but tend to disregard other requirements.
For example, a cleat shoe described in US 2011/0308108 A1 comprises an inner layer and an outer layer. Fasteners in the form of ribbons are mounted between the inner layer and the outer layer in order to fix the shoe to the foot. The shoe provides sufficient support to the foot of a wearer, but it is cumbersome to handle, heavy and, due to the inner layer, outer layer, and the fasteners being arranged on top of each other, it does not allow a good feel for the ball.
Similar disadvantages can be found in the soccer shoe described in DE 10 2010 037 585 A1, which consists of an inner section and an outer section. The inner section meets the essential requirements, such as stability for the foot, protection for vulnerable areas of the foot, cushioning of the footbed, as well as contact properties with the ball, and the outer section ensures the carrying function for the sole portion and the cleat connection. However, shoe is heavy and cumbersome to handle.
The present invention therefore has the aim of providing a soccer shoe which is light, provides sufficient support to a wearer, and allows good control of the ball.
The terms “invention,” “the invention,” “this invention” and “the present invention” used in this patent are intended to refer broadly to all of the subject matter of this patent and the patent claims below. Statements containing these terms should be understood not to limit the subject matter described herein or to limit the meaning or scope of the patent claims below. Embodiments of the invention covered by this patent are defined by the claims below, not this summary. This summary is a high-level overview of various embodiments of the invention and introduces some of the concepts that are further described in the Detailed Description section below. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used in isolation to determine the scope of the claimed subject matter. The subject matter should be understood by reference to appropriate portions of the entire specification of this patent, any or all drawings and each claim.
According to certain embodiments of the present invention, a soccer shoe comprises an upper comprising knitwear, and a sole comprising cleats, wherein the sole is connected to the knitwear, and the knitwear is configured to couple the sole to a foot of a wearer when the soccer shoe is worn. In some embodiments, the sole is a rigid sole.
The knitwear may be configured to extend above an ankle of the wearer when the soccer shoe is worn. In certain embodiments, the knitwear comprises more than one weft-knitted or warp-knitted sections. The knitwear may also be formed as one-piece knitwear. In some embodiments, the knitwear substantially encloses the foot of the wearer when the soccer shoe is worn. The knitwear may be weft-knitted and/or may be warp-knitted.
In some embodiments, the soccer shoe does not comprise a separate tongue in an area of an instep and/or the soccer shoe does not comprise laces.
According to certain embodiments of the present invention, a soccer shoe comprises an upper comprising knitwear, wherein the knitwear comprises a first and a second weft-knitted or warp-knitted layers, and a sole comprising cleats, wherein the sole is connected to the knitwear, and the knitwear is configured to couple the sole to a foot of a wearer when the soccer shoe is worn.
In some embodiments, a reinforcement is arranged between the first and the second weft-knitted or warp-knitted layers. The reinforcement may be made from plastic and/or may be arranged in at least one of a lateral area and a medial area of the upper.
In certain embodiments, the knitwear is coated, such that friction between a soccer ball and the coated knitwear is increased compared to friction between the soccer ball and uncoated knitwear.
According to some embodiments, the upper does not comprise a securing element. The upper may be configured to overlap a section of a shin guard when the soccer shoe is worn.
In some embodiments, the knitwear is made on a flat weft-knitting or warp-knitting machine. In additional embodiments, the knitwear is made on a circular weft-knitting or warp-knitting machine. The knitwear may be reinforced with a polymer reinforcement.
In certain embodiments, the upper is configured to connect to a shin guard or a soccer sock.
According to certain embodiments, a method of manufacturing a soccer shoe comprises providing the sole, weft-knitting or warp-knitting the knitwear for the upper, such that the knitwear is configured to couple the sole to a foot of a wearer when the soccer shoe is worn, and connecting the sole to the upper.
In certain embodiments, the sole is a rigid sole. The knitwear may be weft-knitted or warp-knitted and configured to extend above an ankle of the wearer when the soccer shoe is worn.
In some embodiments, the weft-knitting or warp-knitting of the knitwear further comprises weft-knitting or warp-knitting multiple weft-knitted or warp-knitted sections, and joining the multiple weft-knitted or warp-knitted section to form the knitwear.
In the following detailed description, embodiments of the invention are described referring to the following figures:
According to a first aspect of the present invention, this aim is achieved by a soccer shoe which comprises a shoe upper comprising knitwear and a rigid sole which comprises cleats and is connected to the knitwear, wherein the knitwear is capable of coupling the sole to a foot of a wearer of the soccer shoe while the soccer shoe is being worn.
By the soccer shoe according to the invention comprising a shoe upper which comprises knitwear, the material of the shoe upper is sufficiently thin for providing direct and immediate contact to a soccer ball. The wearer of the soccer shoe in accordance with the invention thus has good control of the ball, which may be beneficial when dribbling or shooting, for example. Moreover, knitwear comprises a certain level of stretchability so that the shoe upper may optimally adjust to the shape of the foot and provides the wearer with the necessary support.
The knitwear of the shoe upper is furthermore suitable for coupling the sole of the soccer shoe to the foot of a wearer of the soccer shoe while it is being worn. In this way, the sole is tightly connected to the foot so that twisting of the foot is avoided or at least reduced. The knitwear essentially, i.e. more than 50% of the required forces, causes the sole to be fixed under the foot of the wearer and to hold it in its position.
Thus, by knitwear being used in the shoe upper for coupling the sole to the foot, the soccer shoe is very light on the one hand while providing the foot with the necessary stability due to an optimal fit on the other hand. The knitwear may generally also be arranged only on the outside of the shoe upper, only on the inside of the shoe upper, or both on the inside and on the outside. The inside is the side of the shoe upper facing the foot. The outside is the side of the shoe upper facing away from the foot.
The sole of the shoe according to certain embodiments of the invention comprises sufficient rigidity to transmit forces between the foot and the ground, which occur during playing soccer on grass, artificial turf, or indoor.
Cleats are understood as any type of bump on the sole that is capable of increasing the traction of the sole with the ground, for example grass or artificial turf. The cleats comprise such a hardness that they press into the ground, e.g. grass or artificial turf, to some degree under the weight of a soccer player.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the sole is a rigid sole. A rigid sole provides a soccer player sufficient support and provides good transmission of forces between a foot of the player and the ground, especially on grass and artificial turf.
In additional embodiments of the invention, the knitwear is capable of extending above an ankle of the foot while the soccer shoe is being worn. Due to this, the sole of the soccer shoe may be coupled to the foot very tightly, since the contact area of the knitwear with the foot is correspondingly large. Moreover, the “taping” necessary among soccer players, i.e. wrapping the ankle area in ribbons, may not be necessary. This is because the knitwear extending above the ankle protects the ankle from injuries, while also ensuring a smooth transition from the soccer shoe to a shin guard and/or soccer socks on the other hand. The knitwear may be suitable for extending all the way to a knee while the soccer shoe is being worn.
In further embodiments of the invention, the knitwear consists of several weft-knitted or warp-knitted sections. This enables use of knitwear only in areas that are necessary for safely coupling the sole of the soccer shoe to the foot. Other materials may be used in other areas. Moreover, individual knitwear sections may be manufactured on a flat weft-knitting machine or a flat warp-knitting machine and then connected in order to obtain a three-dimensional shape.
In alternative embodiments of the invention, the knitwear may be formed as one-piece knitwear. One-piece knitwear may simply and cost-effectively be weft-knitted or warp-knitted on a corresponding machine. Since seams can be omitted, pressure sores may be reduced or avoided.
In further embodiments of the invention, the sole of the soccer shoe comprises knitwear. In additional embodiments, the sole and the knitwear are formed as one-piece knitwear. In this case, the soccer shoe may be produced in one piece on a corresponding weft-knitting or warp-knitting machine.
In some embodiments, knitwear encloses a foot of a wearer of the soccer shoe substantially completely. This ensures a firm coupling of the sole of the soccer shoe to the foot by the knitwear. The soccer shoe provides the foot with a high degree of stability.
In further embodiments of the invention, the knitwear is weft-knitted. Weft-knitted knitwear may be simply and specifically provided with functional properties. Weft-knitted knitwear may, for example, be weft-knitted in a more open-meshed manner in places where the most humidity occurs on the foot so as to specifically better air the foot in these places. The knitwear may be flat weft-knitted or circular weft-knitted.
In additional embodiments of the invention, the knitwear is warp-knitted. By machine warp-knitting, the knitwear may be produced relatively rapidly and cost-effectively. The knitwear may be either flat warp-knitted or circular warp-knitted.
The knitwear may be formed to fulfil the function of a tongue in the area of the instep. In this manner, separately forming the tongue may be omitted so that the manufacture of the soccer shoe is simplified. Moreover, pressure sores are reduced or prevented since the otherwise common discontinuous transition between the tongue and the shoe upper is omitted.
In certain embodiments, the knitwear is formed to fulfil the function of laces. Thus, laces may be omitted, which simplifies the handling of the soccer shoe, as well as its manufacture.
The sole may be injection molded to the shoe upper. This enables a simple manufacture of the soccer shoe, since the work step of connecting the sole to the shoe upper is omitted. In further embodiments, the sole is injection molded directly to the knitwear. This ensures a firm coupling of the sole to a foot of a wearer of the soccer shoe. In certain embodiments, polyurethane (“PU”), thermoplastic polyurethane (“TPU”) or polyamides (“PA”) are used for injection molding the sole to the shoe upper.
In alternative embodiments of the invention, the sole is glued to the shoe upper. For example, the sole may be manufactured by injection molding and may be subsequently glued to the shoe upper. Suitable materials for manufacturing the sole are rubber, ethylene vinyl acetate (“EVA”), or expanded thermoplastic polyurethane (“eTPU”).
In certain embodiments of the invention, the knitwear of the upper comprises a first and a second weft-knitted or warp-knitted layer. In this way, the material thickness of the shoe upper may be specifically varied.
A reinforcement may be arranged between the first and the second weft-knit or warp-knit layer. The reinforcement may simply be placed between the first and the second layer. In this manner, the soccer shoe may be cost-effectively reinforced in specific places, for example in the toe region or the heel region or in both areas. The reinforcement may be generally manufactured from any desired material which is suitable for structural reinforcement like e.g. a fibrous web or a textile. The reinforcement may also be arranged in a shin area of the shoe upper. In this way, a separate shin guard may be omitted.
The reinforcement may be made from plastic. Reinforcements made from plastic are simple and cost-effective to manufacture by corresponding methods, such as injection molding. Suitable plastics are PU, polyethylene, polypropylene, and EVA, for example. These may be used e.g. as a sheet for reinforcement. Alternatively, the reinforcement is a non-woven made from the mentioned plastics. The sheet or the non-woven may be applied to an inner side or an outer side of the soccer shoe.
The reinforcement may be arranged in a lateral area or in a medial area or in a lateral and a medial area of the upper. In this way, the soccer shoe may specifically be reinforced in areas in which it comes into contact with the ball. At the same time, however, the reinforcement may be formed in a sufficiently thin manner, e.g. as a plastic sheet, so as not to considerably restrict the feel for the ball.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the shoe upper does not comprise a securing element. Dispensing with a securing element, such as laces, for example, enables a more cost-effective manufacture of the soccer shoe. In general, using knitwear allows for such an accurately fitting manufacture that a securing element may be omitted.
The knitwear may be coated, such that the friction between a soccer ball and the knitwear is increased compared to uncoated knitwear. This allows for the ball to be played precisely. Moreover, the soccer player is able to provide the ball with a spin, which is referred to as swerve, so as to cause a bent trajectory.
The upper may comprise such a height that the upper edge of the upper overlaps a section of a shin guard while the soccer shoe is being worn. A smooth transition may thus be created between the shin guard and the soccer shoe. “Taping” the ankle area, as was mentioned before, may be omitted.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the knitwear is made on a flat weft-knitting machine or a flat warp-knitting machine. The knitwear may be manufactured simply and cost-effectively on a flat weft-knitting machine or a flat warp-knitting machine.
In alternative embodiments of the invention, the knitwear is made on a circular weft-knitting machine or a circular warp-knitting machine. Knitwear manufactured on circular weft-knitting machines or circular warp-knitting machines already has a tube-like shape and is therefore easier to adjust to the shape of a cobbler's last and thus to the shape of the foot.
In certain embodiments of the invention, the upper comprises a coupling mechanism to connect the upper to a shin guard or a soccer sock. This further increases the coupling of the sole of the soccer shoe to the foot.
The coupling mechanism may be a hook-and-loop fastener. A hook-and-loop fastener is easy to attach to the shoe upper or the soccer sock, e.g. by sewing, and it is very easy to handle.
The knitwear may be reinforced with a polymer reinforcement. The knitwear may be provided with a polymer reinforcement, e.g. by the latter being applied as a coating.
Further aspects of the present invention relate to a method of manufacturing a soccer shoe as described above, the method comprising: providing the sole; weft-knitting or warp-knitting the knitwear for the upper, such that the knitwear is capable of coupling the sole to a foot of a wearer of the soccer shoe during wearing the soccer shoe; and connecting the sole to the upper.
In certain embodiments, the sole provided is a rigid sole. A rigid sole provides a soccer player sufficient support and provides good transmission of forces between a foot of the player and the ground, especially on grass and artificial turf.
The knitwear may be weft-knitted or warp-knitted such that the knitwear is capable of extending above an ankle of a foot while the soccer shoe is being worn. Due to this, the sole of the soccer shoe may be coupled to the foot very tightly, since the contact area of the knitwear with the foot is correspondingly large. Moreover, the aforementioned “taping” may be omitted. This is because on the one hand, the knitwear extending above the ankle protects the ankle from injuries on the one hand while ensuring a smooth transition from the soccer shoe to a shin guard and/or soccer socks on the other hand.
The weft-knitting or warp-knitting of the knitwear may further comprise: weft-knitting or warp-knitting multiple weft-knitted or warp-knitted sections; and joining the multiple weft-knitted or warp-knitted sections to form the knitwear. This enables use of knitwear only in areas that are necessary for safely coupling the sole of the soccer shoe to the foot. Other materials may be used in other areas. Moreover, individual knitwear sections may be manufactured on a flat weft-knitting machine or a flat warp-knitting machine and connected then in order to obtain a three-dimensional shape.
The subject matter of embodiments of the present invention is described here with specificity to meet statutory requirements, but this description is not necessarily intended to limit the scope of the claims. The claimed subject matter may be embodied in other ways, may include different elements or steps, and may be used in conjunction with other existing or future technologies. This description should not be interpreted as implying any particular order or arrangement among or between various steps or elements except when the order of individual steps or arrangement of elements is explicitly described.
Embodiments and variations of the present invention will be described in more detail below.
The use of knitwear allows products such as a shoe upper or a sole of a shoe, such as an insole, strobel sole, midsole and/or outer sole to be equipped with areas having different characteristics and providing different functions with low production effort. The properties include bendability, stretchability (expressed as Young's modulus, for example), permeability to air and water, thermoconductivity, thermal capacity, moisture absorption, static friction, abrasion resistance, hardness, and thickness, for example.
Various techniques are applied in order to achieve such characteristics or functions, which will be described in the following. Such suitable techniques in manufacturing knitwear include knitting techniques, the selection of fibers and yarns, coating the fibers, yarns or knitwear with polymer or other materials, the use of monofilaments, the combination of monofilaments and polymer coating, the application of fuse/melt yarns, and multi-layer textile material. In general, the yarns used for the manufacture of knitwear may be equipped, i.e. coated accordingly. In addition or alternatively, the finished knitwear may be equipped accordingly.
Another aspect of providing functions concerns the specific use of knitwear for certain areas of a product, for example of a shoe upper or a sole, and the connection of different parts by suitable connection techniques. The mentioned aspects and techniques as well as other aspects and techniques will be explained in the following.
The described techniques may be used individually or may be combined in any manner.
Knitwear
Knitwear used in the present invention is divided into weft-knitted fabrics and single-thread warp-knitted fabrics on the one hand and warp-knitted fabrics on the other hand. The distinctive characteristic of knitwear is that it is formed of interlocking yarn or thread loops. These thread loops are also referred to as stitches and may be formed of one or several yarns or threads.
Yarn or thread are terms for a structure of one or several fibers which is long in relation to its diameter. A fiber is a flexible structure which is rather thin in relation to its length. Very long fibers, of virtually unlimited length with regard to their use, are referred to as filaments. Monofilaments are yarns formed of one single filament, that is, one single fiber.
In weft-knitted fabrics and single-thread warp-knitted fabrics, the stitch formation requires at least one thread or yarn, with the thread running in longitudinal direction of the product, i.e. substantially at a right angle to the direction in which the product is made during the manufacturing process. In warp-knitted fabrics, the stitch formation requires at least one warp sheet, i.e. a plurality of so-called warps. These stitch-forming threads run in longitudinal direction, i.e. substantially in the direction in which the product is made during the manufacturing process.
Certain embodiments of a weft-knitted fabric that may be used for the present invention with a filler yarn 15 is shown in
Warp-knitted fabric 13 is created by warp-knitting with many threads from top down, as shown in
By way of example, the interlaces tricot 21, 2×1 plain 22, and atlas 23 are shown in
Stitches arranged above each other with joint binding sites are referred to as wales.
Three basic weft-knitted structures are known in weft-knitted fabrics, which may be recognized by the run of the stitches along a wale. With plain, single Jersey, only back loops may be recognized along a wale on one side of the fabric and only back loops may be recognized along the other side of the product. This structure is created on one row of needles of a knitting machine, i.e. an arrangement of neighboring knitting needles, and also referred to as single Jersey. With rib fabric, front and back loops alternate within a course, i.e. either only front or back loops may be found along a wale, depending on the side of the product from which the wale is considered. This structure is created on two rows of needles with needles offset opposite each other. With purl fabric, front and back loops alternate in one wale. Both sides of the product look the same. This structure is manufactured using latch needles as illustrated in
In many embodiments, a variety of structures and surfaces that may be created with knitwear, which may or may not also be possible with weaving. It is possible to manufacture both very heavy and/or stiff knitwear and very soft, transparent and/or stretchable knitwear with substantially the same manufacturing technique. The parameters by which the properties of the material may be influenced substantially are the pattern of weft-knitting or warp-knitting, respectively, the used yarn, the needle size or the needle distance, and the tensile strain subject to which the yarn is placed on the needles.
In certain embodiments of weft-knitting, yarns may be weft-knitted in at freely selectable places. In this manner, selected zones may be provided with certain properties. For example, the shoe upper for the soccer shoe according to certain embodiments of the invention may be provided with zones made from rubberized yarn in order to achieve higher static friction and thus enable the player to better control the ball. By certain yarns being weft-knitted in at selected places, no additional elements have to be applied.
Knitted fabrics are manufactured on machines in the industrial context. These machines usually comprise a plurality of needles. In weft-knitting, latch needles 41 are usually used, which may comprise a moveable latch 42, as illustrated in
A differentiation is made between flat-knitting and circular-knitting machines. In flat-knitting machines, a thread feeder feeds the thread back and forth along a row of needles. In a circular-knitting machine, the needles are arranged in a circular manner and the thread feeding correspondingly takes place in a circular movement along one or more round rows of needles.
Instead of a single row of needles, it is also possible for a knitting machine to comprise two parallel rows of needles. When looked at from the side, the needles of the two rows of needles may, for example, be opposite each other at a right angle. This enables the manufacture of more elaborate structures or weaves. The use of two rows of needles allows the manufacture of a one-layered or two-layered weft-knitted fabric. A one-layered weft-knitted fabric is created when the stitches generated on the first row of needles are enmeshed with the stitches generated on the second row of needles. Accordingly, a two-layered weft-knitted fabric is created when the stitches generate on the first row of needles are not or only selectively enmeshed with the stitches generated on the second row of needles and/or if they are merely enmeshed at the end of the weft-knitted fabric. If the stitches generated on the first row of needles are loosely enmeshed only selectively with the stitches generated on the second row of needles by an additional yarn, this is also referred to as spacer weft-knitted fabric. The additional yarn, for example a monofilament, is thus guided back and forth between two layers, so that a distance between the two layers is created. The two layers may e.g. be connected to each other via so-called tuck stitch.
Generally, the following weft-knitted fabrics may thus be manufactured on a weft-knitting machine: If only one row of needles is used, a one-layered weft-knitted fabric may be created. When two rows of needles are used, the stitches of both rows of needles may consistently be connected to each other so that the resulting knitwear comprises a single layer. If the stitches of both rows of needles are not connected or only connected at the edge when two rows of needles are used or are only selectively connected in certain locations, two layers are created. If the stitches of both rows of needles are connected selectively in turns by an additional thread, a spacer weft-knitted fabric is created. The additional thread is also referred to as spacer thread and it may be fed via a separate yarn feeder.
In certain embodiments, single-thread warp-knitted fabrics may be manufactured by jointly moved needles. In other embodiments, single-thread warp-knitted fabrics needles may be manufactured by fixing the needles and moving the fabric to create the relative motion between the needles and the fabric. In contrast to weft-knitting, the needles are typically not moved individually. Similar to weft-knitting, there are flat single thread warp-knitting and circular single thread warp-knitting machines.
In warp-knitting, one or several coiled threads, which are next to one another, are used. In stitch formation, the individual warps are placed around the needles and the needles are moved jointly.
The techniques described herein as well as further aspects of the manufacture of knitwear may be found in “Fachwissen Bekleidung”, 6th ed. by H. Eberle et al. (published with the title “Clothing Technology” in English), in “Textil- and Modelexikon”, 6th ed. by Alfons Hofer and in “Maschenlexikon”, 11th ed. by Walter Holthaus, for example.
Three-Dimensional Knitwear
Three-dimensional (3D) knitwear may also be manufactured on weft-knitting machines and warp-knitting machines. This is knitwear comprises a spatial structure although it is weft-knitted or warp-knitted in a single process. A three-dimensional weft-knitting or warp-knitting technique allows for spatial knitwear to be manufactured without seams, cut or manufacture in one piece and in a single process.
Three-dimensional knitwear may, for example, be manufactured by varying the number of stitches in the direction of the wales by partial courses being formed. The corresponding mechanical process is referred to as “needle parking”. Depending on the requirement, this technique may be combined with structural variations and/or variations of the number of stitches in the direction of the course. When partial courses are formed, stitch formation temporarily occurs only along a partial width of the weft-knitted fabric or warp-knitted fabric. The needles which are not involved in the stitch formation keep the half stitches (“needle parking”) until weft-knitting occurs again at this position. In this way, it is possible to form bulges, for example.
By three-dimensional weft-knitting or warp-knitting, a shoe upper may be adjusted to the cobbler's last or the foot and a sole may be profiled, for example. The tongue of a shoe may e.g. be weft-knitted into the right shape. Contours, structures, knobs, curvatures, notches, openings, fasteners, loops and pockets may be integrated into the knitwear in a single process.
Three-dimensional knitwear may be used for the present invention in an advantageous manner.
Functional Knitwear
According to certain embodiments of the present invention, knitwear and particularly weft-knitted fabric may be provided with a range of functional properties and used in the present invention.
It is possible using a weft-knitting technique to manufacture knitwear having different functional areas and simultaneously maintaining its contours. The structures of knitwear may be adjusted to functional requirements in certain areas, by the stitch pattern, the yarn, the needle size, the needle distance or the tensile strain subject to which the yarn is placed on the needles being selected accordingly.
It is possible, for example, to include structures with large stitches or openings within the knitwear in areas in which airing is desired. In contrast, in areas in which support and stability are desired, fine-meshed stitch patterns, stiffer yarns or even multi-layered weft-knitting structures may be used, which will be described in the following. In the same manner, the thickness of the knitwear is variable.
Knitwear having more than one layer provides numerous possible constructions for the knitwear, which provide many advantages. Knitwear with more than one layer, e.g. two, may be weft-knitted or warp-knitted on a weft-knitting machine or a warp-knitting machine with several rows of needles, e.g. two, in a single stage, as described in the section “knitwear” above. Alternatively, several layers, e.g. two, may be weft-knitted or warp-knitted in separate stages and then placed above each other and connected to each other if applicable, e.g. by sewing, gluing, welding or linking.
Several layers fundamentally increase solidness and stability of the knitwear. In this regard, the resulting solidness depends on the extent to which and the techniques by which the layers are connected to each other. The same yarn or different yarns may be used for the individual layers. For example, it is possible for one layer to be weft-knitted from multi-fiber yarn and one layer to be weft-knitted from monofilament, whose stitches are enmeshed in a weft-knitted fabric. In particular, stretchability of the weft-knitted layer is reduced due to this combination of different yarns. In this construction, a layer made from monofilament may be arranged between two layers made from multi-fiber yarn in order to reduce stretchability and increase solidness of the knitwear. This results in a pleasant surface made from multi-fiber yarn on both sides of the knitwear.
An alternative of two-layered knitwear is referred to as spacer weft-knitted fabric or spacer warp-knitted fabric, as explained in the section “knitwear”. In this regard, a spacer yarn is weft-knitted or warp-knitted more or less loosely between two weft-knitted or warp-knitted layers, interconnecting the two layers and simultaneously serving as a filler. The spacer yarn may comprise the same material as the layers themselves, e.g. polyester or another material. The spacer yarn may also be a monofilament which provides the spacer weft-knitted fabric or spacer warp-knitted fabric with stability.
Such spacer weft-knitted fabrics or spacer warp-knitted fabrics, respectively, which are also referred to as three-dimensional weft-knitted fabrics, which are differentiated from the formative 3D weft-knitted fabrics or 3D warp-knitted fabrics mentioned in the section “three-dimensional knitwear” above, may be used wherever additional cushioning or protection is desired, e.g. at the shoe upper or the tongue of a shoe upper or in certain areas of a sole. Three-dimensional structures may also serve to create spaces between neighboring textile layers or also between a textile layer and the foot and thus ensuring airing. Moreover, the layers of a spacer weft-knitted fabric or a spacer warp-knitted fabric may comprise different yarns depending on the position of the spacer weft-knitted fabric on the foot.
The thickness of a spacer weft-knitted fabric or a spacer warp-knitted fabric may be set in different areas depending on the function or the wearer. Various degrees of cushioning may be achieved with areas of various thicknesses, for example. Thin areas may increase bendability, for example, thus fulfilling the function of joints or flex lines.
Multi-layered constructions also provide opportunities for color design, by different colors being used for different layers. In this way, knitwear may be provided with two different colors for the front and the back, for example. A shoe upper made from such knitwear may then comprise a different color on the outside than on the inside.
Other multi-layered constructions may include pockets or tunnels, in which two textile layers or knitwear weft-knitted or warp-knitted on two rows of needles are connected to each other only in certain areas so that a hollow space is created. Alternatively, items of knitwear weft-knitted or warp-knitted in two separate processes are connected to each other such that a void is created, e.g. by sewing, gluing, welding or linking. It is then possible to introduce a cushioning material such as a foam material, eTPU (expanded thermoplastic urethane), ePP (expanded polypropylene), expanded EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) or particle foam, an air or gel cushion for example, through an opening, e.g. at the tongue, the shoe upper, the heel, the sole or in other areas. Alternatively or additionally, the pocket may also be filled with a filler thread or a spacer knitwear. It is furthermore possible for threads to be pulled through tunnels, for example as reinforcement in case of tension loads in certain areas of a shoe upper. Moreover, it is also possible for the laces to be guided through such tunnels. Moreover, loose threads may be placed into tunnels or pockets for padding, for example in the area of the ankle. However, it is also possible for stiffer reinforcing elements, such as caps, flaps or bones to be inserted into tunnels or pockets. These may be manufactured from plastic such as polyethylene, TPU, polyethylene or polypropylene, for example.
A further possibility for a functional design of knitwear is the use of certain variations of the basic weaves. In weft-knitting, it is possible for bulges, ribs or waves to be weft-knitted in certain areas, for example, in order to achieve reinforcement in these places. A wave may, for example, be created by stitch accumulation on a layer of knitwear. This means that more stitches are weft-knitted or warp-knitted on one layer than on another layer. Alternatively, different stitches are weft-knitted fabric on the one layer than on the other layer, e.g. by being weft-knitted fabric tighter, wider or using a different yarn. Thickening is caused in both alternatives.
Ribs, waves, or similar patterns may, for example, also be used at the bottom of a weft-knitted outer sole of a shoe in order to provide a tread and provide the shoe with better non-slip properties. In order to obtain a rather thick weft-knitted fabric, for example, it is possible to use the weft-knitting techniques “tuck” or “half cardigan”, which are described in “Fachwissen Bekleidung”, 6th ed. by H. Eberle et al., for example.
Waves may be weft-knitted or warp-knitted such that a connection is created between two layers of a two-layered knitwear or such that no connection is created between the two layers. A wave may also be weft-knitted as a right-left wave on both sides with or without a connection of the two layers. A structure in the knitwear may be achieved by an uneven ration of stitches on the front or the back of the knitwear.
Ribs, waves or similar patterns, for example, may be included in the knitwear of the soccer shoe according to certain embodiments of the invention in order to increase friction with a soccer ball, for example, and/or in order to generally allow for a soccer player to have better control of the ball.
A further possibility of functionally designing knitwear within the framework of the present invention is providing openings in the knitwear already during weft-knitting or warp-knitting. In this manner, airing of the soccer shoe according to the invention may be provided in specific places in a simple manner.
In certain embodiments, functionally designing knitwear within the framework may include forming laces integrally with the knitwear of the shoe upper. In these embodiments, the laces are warp-knitted or weft-knitted integrally with the knitwear already when the knitwear of the shoe upper is weft-knitted or warp-knitted. In this regard, a first end of a lace is connected to the knitwear, while a second end is free.
In some embodiments, the first end is connected to the knitwear of the shoe upper in the area of the transition from the tongue to the area of the forefoot of the shoe upper. In these embodiments, a first end of a first lace may be connected to the knitwear of the shoe upper at the medial side of the tongue and a first end of a second lace is connected to the knitwear of the shoe upper at the lateral side of the tongue. The respective second ends of the two laces may then be pulled through lace eyelets for tying the shoe.
A possibility of speeding up the integral weft-knitting or warp-knitting of laces is having all yarns used for weft-knitting or warp-knitting knitwear end in the area of the transition from the tongue to the area of the forefoot of the shoe upper. In some embodiments, the yarns may end in the medial side of the shoe upper on the medial side of the tongue and form the lace connected on the medial side of the tongue. In certain embodiments, the yarns may end in the lateral side of the shoe upper on the lateral side of the tongue and form the lace connected to the lateral side of the tongue. The yarns may then be cut off at a length that is sufficiently long for forming laces. The yarns may be twisted or intertwined, for example. The respective second end of the laces may be provided with a lace clip. Alternatively, the second ends are fused or provided with a coating.
The knitwear is particularly stretchable in the direction of the stitches (longitudinal direction) due to its construction. This stretching may be reduced e.g. by subsequent polymer coating of the knitwear. The stretching may also be reduced during manufacture of the knitwear itself. One possibility is reducing the mesh openings, that is, using a smaller needle size. Smaller stitches generally result in less stretching of the knitwear. Moreover, the stretching of the knitwear may be reduced by knitted reinforcement, e.g. three-dimensional structures. In various embodiments, such structures may be arranged on the inside or the outside of the knitwear of the shoe upper. Furthermore, non-stretchable yarn, e.g. made from nylon, may be laid in a tunnel along the knitwear in order to limit stretching to the length of the non-stretchable yarn.
Colored areas with several colors may be created by using a different thread and/or by additional layers. In transitional areas, smaller mesh openings (smaller needle sizes) are used in order to achieve a fluent passage of colors.
Further effects may be achieved by weft-knitted insets (inlaid works) or Jacquard knitting. Inlaid works are areas which only provide a certain yarn, e.g. in a certain color. Neighboring areas which may comprise a different yarn, for example in a different color, are then connected to each other by a so-called tuck stitch.
During Jacquard knitting, two rows of needles are used and two different yarns run through all areas, for example. However, in certain areas only one yarn appears on the visible side of the knitwear and the respective other yarn runs invisibly on the other side of the knitwear.
A product manufactured from knitwear may be manufactured in one piece on a weft-knitting machine or a warp-knitting machine. Functional areas may then already be manufactured during weft-knitting or warp-knitting by corresponding techniques as described here.
Alternatively, the product may be combined from several parts of knitwear and it may also comprise parts that are not manufactured from knitwear. In this regard, the parts of knitwear may each be designed separately with different functions, for example regarding thickness, isolation, transport of moisture, stability, protection, abrasion resistance, durability, cooling, stretching, rigidity, compression, etc.
In certain embodiments, the shoe upper of the soccer shoe and/or its sole may, for example, be generally manufactured from knitwear as a whole or it may be put together from different parts of knitted goods. A whole shoe upper or parts of that may, for example, be separated, e.g. punched, from a larger piece of knitwear. The larger piece of knitwear may, for example, be a circular weft-knitted fabric or a circular warp-knitted fabric or a flat weft-knitted fabric or a flat warp-knitted fabric.
For example, a tongue may be manufactured as a continuous piece and connected with the shoe upper subsequently, or it may be manufactured in one piece with the shoe upper. With regard to their functional designs, ridges on the inside may e.g. improve flexibility of the tongue and ensure that a distance is created between the tongue and the foot, which provides additional airing. Laces may be guided through one or several weft-knitted tunnels of the tongue. The tongue may also be reinforced with polymer in order to achieve stabilization of the tongue and e.g. prevent a very thin tongue from convolving. Moreover, the tongue may then also be fitted to the shape of the cobbler's last or the foot.
Applications such as PU prints, TPU ribbons, textile reinforcements, leather, rubber, etc., may be subsequently applied to the knitwear of the soccer shoe. Thus, it is possible, for example, to apply a plastic heel or toe cap as reinforcement or logos and eyelets for laces on the shoe upper, for example by sewing, gluing or welding, as described below.
Sewing, gluing or welding, for example, constitute suitable connection techniques for connecting individual parts of knitwear with other textiles or with other parts of knitwear. Linking is another possibility for connecting two parts of knitwear. Therein, two edges of knitwear are connected to each other according to the stitches (usually stitch by stitch).
A possibility for welding textiles, particularly ones made from plastic yarns or threads, is ultrasonic welding. Therein, mechanical oscillations in the ultrasonic frequency range are transferred to a tool referred to as a sonotrode. The oscillations are transferred to the textiles to be connected by the sonotrode under pressure. Due to the resulting friction, the textiles are heated up, softened and ultimately connected in the area of the place of contact with the sonotrode. Ultrasonic welding allows rapidly and cost-effectively connecting particularly textiles with plastic yarns or threads. It is possible for a ribbon to be attached, for example glued, to the weld seam, which additionally reinforces the weld seam and is optically more appealing. Moreover, wear comfort is increased since skin irritations—especially at the transition to the tongue—are avoided.
Connecting various textile areas, such as parts of knitwear, may occur at quite different locations. For example, the seams for connecting various textile areas of the shoe upper of the soccer shoe may be arranged at various positions, as shown in
The seam 54 which connects the two textile areas 52 and 53 runs diagonally from an instep area of the shoe upper to an area of the sole in the transition area from the midfoot to the heel. In
In certain embodiments, adhesive tape may be used to connect textile areas. This feature may also be used in addition to an existing connection, e.g. over a sewn seam or a welded seam. An adhesive tape may fulfill further functions in addition to the function of connecting, such as e.g. protection against dirt or water. An adhesive tape may comprise properties which change over its length.
Embodiments of a shoe upper 51 connected to a shoe sole 61 using adhesive tape are shown in
The shoe sole 61 may be an outsole or a midsole. The shoe upper 51 and the shoe sole 61 are connected to each other by a surrounding adhesive tape 62. The adhesive tape 62 may be of varying flexibility along its length. For example, the adhesive tape 62 might be particularly rigid and not very flexible in the shoe's heel region in order to provide the shoe with the necessary stability in the heel region. This may be achieved by varying the width and/or the thickness of the adhesive tape 62, for example. The adhesive tape 62 may generally be constructed such that it is able to receive certain forces in certain areas along the tape.
In this way, the adhesive tape 62 does not only connect the shoe upper to the sole but simultaneously fulfills the function of structural reinforcement.
Fibers
The yarns or threads, respectively, used for the knitwear of the present invention usually comprise fibers. As was explained above, a flexible structure which is rather thin in relation to its length is referred to as a fiber. Very long fibers, of virtually unlimited length with regard to their use, are referred to as filaments. Fibers are spun or twisted into threads or yarns. Fibers may also be long, however, and twirled into a yarn. Fibers may include natural or synthetic materials. Natural fibers are environmentally friendly, since they are compostable. Natural fibers include cotton, wool, alpaca, hemp, coconut fibers or silk, for example. Among the synthetic fibers are polymer-based fibers such as nylon, polyester, elastane, or spandex, respectively, or Kevlar® or other para-aramid synthetic fiber, which may be produced as classic fibers or as high-performance fibers or technical fibers.
In certain embodiments, a soccer shoe may be assembled from various parts, with a weft-knitted or a warp-knitted part comprising natural yarn made from natural fibers and a removable part, e.g. the insole, comprising plastic, for example. In this manner, both parts may be disposed of separately. In this example, the weft-knitted part could be directed to compostable waste, whereas the insole could be directed to recycling of reusable materials, for example.
The mechanical and physical properties of a fiber and the yarn manufactured therefrom are also determined by the fiber's cross-section, as illustrated in
A fiber having the circular cross-section 710 may either be solid or hollow. A solid fiber is the most frequent type, it allows easy bending and is soft to the touch. A fiber as a hollow circle with the same weight/length ratio as the solid fiber has a larger cross-section and is more resistant to bending. Examples of fibers with a circular cross-section are nylon, polyester, and Lyocell.
A fiber having the bone-shaped cross-section 730 has the property of wicking moisture. Examples of such fibers are acrylic or spandex. The concave areas in the middle of the fiber support moisture being passed on in the longitudinal direction, with moisture being rapidly wicked from a certain place and distributed.
The following further cross-sections are illustrated in
Individual fibers with their properties which are relevant for the manufacture of knitwear for the present invention will be described in the following:
A plurality of different yarns may be used for the manufacture of knitwear according to certain embodiments in the present invention. As was already defined, a structure of one or several fibers which is long in relation to its diameter is referred to as a yarn.
Functional yarns are capable of transporting moisture and thus of absorbing sweat and moisture. They may be electrically conducting, self-cleaning, thermally regulating and insulating, flame resistant, and UV-absorbing, and may enable infrared radiation. They may be suitable for sensors. Antibacterial yarns, such as silver yarns, for example, prevent odor formation.
Stainless steel yarn contains fibers made of a blend of nylon or polyester and steel. Its properties include high abrasion resistance, higher cut resistance, high thermal abrasion, high thermal and electrical conductivity, higher tensile strength and high weight.
In textiles made from knitwear, electrically conducting yarns may be used for the integration of electronic devices. These yarns may, for example, forward impulses from sensors to devices for processing the impulses, or the yarns may function as sensors themselves, and measure electric streams on the skin or physiological magnetic fields, for example. Examples for the use of textile-based electrodes may be found in European patent application EP 1 916 323.
Fuse yarns may be a mixture of a thermoplastic yarn and a non-thermoplastic yarn. There are essentially three types of fuse yarns: a thermoplastic yarn surrounded by a non-thermoplastic yarn; a non-thermoplastic yarn surrounded by thermoplastic yarn; and pure melt yarn of a thermoplastic material. After being heated to the melting temperature, thermoplastic yarn fuses with the non-thermoplastic yarn (e.g. polyester or nylon), stiffening the knitwear. The melting temperature of the thermoplastic yarn is determined accordingly and it is usually lower than that of the non-thermoplastic yarn in case of a mixed yarn.
A shrinking yarn is a dual-component yarn. The outer component is a shrinking material, which shrinks when a defined temperature is exceeded. The inner component is a non-shrinking yarn, such as polyester or nylon. Shrinking increases the stiffness of the textile material.
A further yarn for use in knitwear are luminescent or reflecting yarns and so-called “intelligent” yarns. Examples of intelligent yarns are yarns which react to humidity, heat or cold and alter their properties accordingly, e.g. contracting and thus making the stitches smaller or changing their volume and thus increasing permeability to air. Yarns made from piezo fibers or yarn coated with a piezo-electrical substance are able to convert kinetic energy or changes in pressure into electricity, which may provide energy to sensors, transmitters or accumulators, for example.
Yarns may furthermore generally be reworked, e.g. coated, in order to maintain certain properties, such as stretching, water resistance/repellency, color or humidity resistance.
Polymer Coating
Due to its structure, weft-knitted or warp-knitted knitwear is considerably more flexible and stretchable than weaved textile materials. For certain applications and requirements, e.g. in certain areas of a shoe upper according to the present invention, it is therefore necessary to reduce flexibility and stretchability in order to achieve sufficient stability.
For that purpose, a polymer layer may be applied to one side or both sides of knitwear (weft-knit or warp-knit goods), but generally also to other textile materials. Such a polymer layer causes a reinforcement and/or stiffening of the knitwear. In a shoe upper it may, for example, serve the purpose of supporting and/or stiffening and/or reducing elasticity in the toe region, in the heel region, along the lace eyelets, on lateral and/or medial surfaces or in other areas. Furthermore, elasticity of the knitwear and particularly stretchability are reduced. Moreover, the polymer layer protects the knitwear against abrasion. Furthermore, it is possible to give the knitwear a three-dimensional shape using the polymer coating by compression-molding. The polymer coating may be thermoplastic urethane (“TPU”), for example.
In the first step of polymer coating, the polymer material may be applied to one side of the knitwear. It may also be applied on both sides, however. The material may be applied by spraying, knife coating, laying, printing, sintering, ironing or spreading. If it is polymer material in the form of a film, the latter is placed on the knitwear and connected with the knitwear by heat and pressure, for example. Spraying may be carried out by a tool similar to a hot glue gun. Spraying enables the polymer material to be applied evenly in thin layers. Moreover, spraying is a fast method. Effect pigments such as color pigments, for example, may be mixed into the polymer coating.
According to certain embodiments, the polymer is applied in at least one layer with a thickness of 0.2-1 mm. One or several layers may be applied, with it being possible for the layers to be of different thicknesses and/or colors. For example, a shoe may comprise a polymer coating with a thickness of 0.01 to 5 mm. Further, with some shoes, the thickness of the polymer coating may be between 0.05 and 2 mm. Between neighboring areas of a shoe with polymer coatings of various thicknesses there may be continuous transitions from areas with a thin polymer coating to areas with a thick polymer coating. In the same manner, different polymer materials may be used in different areas, as will be described in the following.
During application, polymer material attaches itself to the points of contact or points of intersection, respectively, of the yarns of the knitwear, on the one hand, and to the gaps between the yarns, on the other hand, forming a closed polymer surface on the knitwear after the processing steps described in the following. However, in case of larger mesh openings or holes in the textile structure, this closed polymer surface may also be intermittent, e.g. so as to enable airing. This also depends on the thickness of the applied material: The more thinly the polymer material is applied, the easier it is for the closed polymer surface to be intermittent. Moreover, the polymer material may also penetrate the yarn and soak it and thus contributes to its stiffening.
After application of the polymer material, the knitwear is pressed in a press under heat and pressure. The polymer material liquefies in this step and fuses with the yarn of the textile material.
In a further optional step, the knitwear may be pressed into a three-dimensional shape in a machine for compression-molding. For example, the area of the heel or the area of the toe region of a shoe upper may be shaped three-dimensionally over a cobbler's last. Alternatively, the knitwear may also be directly fitted to a foot.
After pressing and molding, the reaction time until complete stiffening may be one to two days, depending on the used polymer material.
The following polymer materials may be used: polyester; polyester-urethane pre-polymer; acrylate; acetate; reactive polyolefins; co-polyester; polyamide; co-polyamide; reactive systems (mainly polyurethane systems reactive with H2O or O2); polyurethanes; thermoplastic polyurethanes; and polymeric dispersions.
The described polymer coating may be used sensibly wherever support functions, stiffening, increased abrasion resistance, elimination of stretchability, increase of comfort, increase of friction, and/or fitting to prescribed three-dimensional geometries are desired. It is also possible to fit the shoe upper to the individual shape of the foot of the person wearing it, by polymer material being applied to the shoe upper and then adapting to the shape of the foot under heat.
Additionally or alternatively to a reinforcing polymer coating, knitwear may be provided with a water-repellent coating to avoid or at least reduce permeation of humidity, e.g. into a shoe upper. The water-repellent coating may be applied to the entire shoe upper or only a part thereof, e.g. in the toe region. Water-repellent materials may be based e.g. on hydrophobic materials such as polytetrafluoroethylene (“PTFE”), wax, or white wax. A commercially available coating is Scotchgard™ from 3M.
Monofilaments for Reinforcement
As was already defined, a monofilament is a yarn formed by one single filament, that is, one single fiber. Therefore, in certain embodiments, stretchability of monofilaments is considerably lower than that of yarns which are manufactured from many fibers. This also reduces the stretchability of knitwear that is manufactured from monofilaments or include monofilaments and which are used in the present invention. Monofilaments are typically made from polyamide. However, other materials, such as polyester or a thermoplastic material, are also possible.
So whereas knitwear made from a monofilament is considerably more rigid and less stretchable, this knitwear may not include the desired surface properties, such as e.g. smoothness, colors, transport of moisture, outer appearance and variety of textile structures as usual knitwear has. This disadvantage is overcome by the knitwear described in the following.
A monofilament may also be melted slightly in order to connect with the layer of the first yarn and limit stretching even more. The monofilament then fuses with the first yarn at the points of contact and fixates the first yarn with respect to the layer made from monofilament.
Combination of Monofilaments and Polymer Coating
The weft-knitted fabric having two layers described in the preceding section may additionally be reinforced by a polymer coating as was already described in the section “polymer coating”. The polymer material is applied to the weft-knitted layer made from monofilament. In doing so, it does not connect to the material (e.g. polyamide material) of the monofilament, since the monofilament has a very smooth and round surface, but substantially penetrates the underlying first layer of a first yarn (e.g. polyester yarn). During subsequent pressing, the polymer material therefore fuses with the yarn of the first layer and reinforces the first layer. In doing so, the polymer material has a lower melting point than the first yarn of the first layer and the monofilament of the second layer. The temperature during pressing is selected such that only the polymer material melts but not the monofilament or the first yarn.
Fuse Yarn
For reinforcement and for the reduction of stretching, the yarn of the knitwear which is used according to the invention may additionally or alternatively also be a fuse yarn that fixes the knitwear after pressing. There are substantially three types of melt yarns: a thermoplastic yarn surrounded by a non-thermoplastic yarn; a non-thermoplastic yarn surrounded by thermoplastic yarn; and pure melt yarn of a thermoplastic material. In order to improve the bond between thermoplastic yarn and the non-thermoplastic yarn, it is possible for the surface of the non-thermoplastic yarn to be texturized.
In certain embodiments, pressing takes place at a temperature ranging from 110 to 150° C., and may further be approximately 130° C. The thermoplastic yarn melts at least partially in the process and fuses with the non-thermoplastic yarn. After pressing, the knitwear is cooled, so that the bond is hardened and fixed. The fuse yarn may be arranged in the entire knitwear or only in selective areas.
In some embodiments, the fuse yarn is weft-knitted or warp-knitted into the knitwear. In case of several layers, the fuse/melt yarn may be weft-knitted into one, several or all layers of the knitwear.
In certain embodiments, the fuse/melt yarn may be arranged between two layers of knitwear. In doing so, the fuse/melt yarn may simply be placed between the layers. Arrangement between the layers may be desirable in certain instances, as the mold is not contaminated or soiled during pressing and molding, since there is no direct contact between the fuse/melt yarn and the mold.
Thermoplastic Textile for Reinforcement
A further possibility for reinforcing knitwear that is used for the present invention is the use of a thermoplastic textile. This is a thermoplastic woven fabric or thermoplastic knitwear. A thermoplastic textile fuses at least partially when subjected to heat and stiffens as it cools down. A thermoplastic textile may, for example, be applied to the surface of the knitwear by applying pressure and heat. When it cools down, the thermoplastic textile stiffens and specifically reinforces the shoe upper in the area in which it was placed, for example.
The thermoplastic textile may be specifically manufactured for the reinforcement in its shape, thickness and structure. Additionally, its properties may be varied in certain areas. The stitch structure, the knitting stitch, and/or the yarn used may be varied such that different properties are achieved in different areas.
According to certain embodiments, a thermoplastic textile is a weft-knitted fabric or warp-knitted fabric made from thermoplastic yarn. Additionally, the thermoplastic textile may also comprise a non-thermoplastic yarn. In some embodiments, the thermoplastic textile may be applied to the shoe upper of the soccer shoe, for example, by pressure and heat.
A woven fabric whose wefts and/or warps are thermoplastic are other embodiments of a thermoplastic textile. Different yarns may be used in the weft direction and the warp direction of the thermoplastic woven fabric, so as to achieve different properties, such as stretchability, in the weft direction and the warp direction.
A spacer weft-knitted fabric or spacer warp-knitted fabric made from thermoplastic material are other embodiments of a thermoplastic textile. In this regard, only one layer may be thermoplastic, for example, so as to be attached to the shoe upper of the soccer shoe. Alternatively, both layers are thermoplastic, for example, in order to connect the sole to the shoe upper.
A thermoplastic weft-knitted fabric or warp-knitted fabric may be manufactured using the manufacturing techniques for knitwear described in the section “knitwear”.
A thermoplastic textile may be connected with the surface to be reinforced only partially subject to pressure and heat so that only certain areas or only a certain area of the thermoplastic textile connects to the surface. Other areas or another area do not connect, so that the permeability for air and/or humidity is maintained there, for example. The function and/or the design of e.g. the shoe upper of the soccer shoe may be modified by this.
Soccer Shoe
The soccer shoe 91 shown in
The soccer shoe 91 further comprises a sole 61 comprising cleats, three of which are denoted with the reference number 92. The sole 61 is connected to the knitwear of the upper 51. The sole 61 may be manufactured in any known manner. For example, the sole 61 may be manufactured via injection molding and may subsequently be connected to the knitwear of the upper 51, e.g. via gluing or welding. Alternatively, the sole 61 may be injection molded to the upper 51. In some embodiments, the sole 61 may be separately manufactured in a 3D printing process and then connected to the shoe upper 51 via gluing or welding. Alternatively, the sole 61 may be directly printed to the shoe upper in a 3D printing process. Materials used to form the sole 61 include but are not limited to TPU, PU, polyamide, rubber, EVA, or combination thereof.
The knitwear of the upper 51 is capable of coupling the sole 61 to a foot of a wearer while wearing the soccer shoe 91, i.e. the knitwear is substantially (more than 50% of the required forces) responsible for positioning the sole 61 under the foot of the wearer and holding it in position. In the shown exemplary embodiments, this coupling is caused by the knitwear of the upper 51 firmly enclosing the foot of the wearer (not shown in the figures) and thereby holding the sole 61 in its position. Also, the stretchability of the knitwear of the upper 51 adds to the firm coupling of the sole 61 to the foot by tightly enclosing the foot.
Cleats are understood as any type of bump on the sole that is capable of increasing the traction of the sole with the ground, for example grass. For example, the cleats and the sole may be a single integrally-formed piece, i.e. the cleats are formed out of the sole. Alternatively, the cleats may have threads and may be screwed into the sole. The cleats may have the form of knobs or knolls and may round, oval, elongated, or any other suitable shape. Further possible forms include but are not limited to pyramid, cone, or truncated cone.
In the shown embodiments, the knitwear of the upper 51 is capable of extending above an ankle of the wearer of the soccer shoe 91 during wear and, thereby, creates a good coupling of the sole 61 to the foot. In general, the upper 51 may comprise such a height that the upper edge of the upper 51 overlaps a section of a shin guard (not shown in the figures) of a wearer when wearing the soccer shoe 91.
The upper 51 may also comprise a coupling mechanism to connect the upper to the shin guard or to a soccer sock (not shown in the figures). This could, for example, be a hook-and-loop fastener. Alternatively or additionally, a good coupling to a shin guard or sock may also be achieved by compression of the knitwear, i.e. the knitwear exerts sufficient pressure on the shin guard or the sock to avoid or at least reduce slipping of the shin guard or sock relative to the knitwear. In this way, a smooth transition between the knitwear and the shin guard may be achieved. The knitwear may be configured to extend to a knee of a wearer.
In alternative embodiments of the invention (not shown in the figures), the shoe upper may comprise a pocket or channel for the shin guard. The pocket or channel may, for example, be weft-knitted or warp-knitted in the knitwear of the shoe upper as a single piece. Alternatively, the pocket or the channel may be made from a different material and may be sewn, glued, or welded to the shoe upper. Further pockets or channels may be arranged on the shoe upper to fix, for example, elements such as electronic elements, protection elements, paddings, thermal elements (e.g. cool or heat packs) to the shoe upper. Further, in embodiments of the present invention, yarns, support structures, and/or weft-knit or warp-knit structures, respectively, may be combined, such that the protection areas are formed. For example, a shock-absorbing area may be formed in the shoe upper 51 protecting the shin.
In alternative embodiments of the invention (not shown in the figures), the knitwear of the upper 51 may extend below an ankle or may extend to an ankle. In these embodiments, the knitwear provides the function of coupling the sole 61 to the foot.
In certain embodiments, as illustrated in
In certain exemplary embodiments, as shown in
Instead of two sections comprising knitwear, the soccer shoe 91 according to the invention may comprise an arbitrary number of sections comprising knitwear. The soccer shoe 91, according to certain embodiments, may alternatively comprise a one-piece knitwear that was manufactured in one piece on a weft-knitting or warp-knitting machine. Additionally or alternatively, the shoe upper 91 may comprise sections of other materials, such as textile, mesh, woven fabric, fibrous web, etc.
In certain exemplary embodiments, as shown in
The soccer shoe 91 shown in
In certain exemplary embodiments, as shown in
The knitwear of the upper according to the invention may be manufactured on a flat weft-knitting machine or a flat warp-knitting machine, respectively, or on a circular weft-knitting machine or a circular warp-knitting machine, respectively. Different sections of the knitwear of the upper 51 may be manufactured on different machines. For example, one section may be manufactured on a flat weft-knitting machine, whereas another section may be manufactured on a circular warp-knitting machine. The sections may subsequently be joined, as described for example in the section “functional knitwear.”
The knitwear of the upper 51 according to the invention may be reinforced with a polymer coating, as described for example in the sections “polymer coating” and “thermoplastic textile for reinforcement.” Such a polymer reinforcement may stiffen and/or thicken the knitwear. Furthermore, the polymer reinforcement may increase the friction of the knitwear with a soccer ball. TPU may, for example, be used as polymer coating.
Reinforcements may also be directly injection molded to the shoe upper, e.g. to the knitwear. For example, a heel counter may be directly injection molded to the shoe upper. Alternatively, a reinforcement may be applied, for example glued, to the shoe upper externally. Further alternatively, a reinforcement may be arranged, e.g. glued, to the inner side of the shoe upper.
In
The knitwear of the soccer shoe 91 shown in
The four sections are joined by corresponding seams 112a, 112b, 112c and 112d. Seam 112a connects the toe region 111a to the metatarsal section 111b. Seam 112b connects the metatarsal section 111b to the lateral section 111c and to the medial section 111d. Seam 112c connects the lateral section 111c to the medial section 111d on the front side of the soccer shoe 91. Seam 112d connects the lateral section 111c to the medial section 111d on the rear side of the soccer shoe 91.
In some embodiments, a strap 114 is glued over the seams 112a, 112b, 112c and 112d on the outer side of the upper 51. This design decreases or avoids a chance that a football is deflected when contacting one of the seams in an undesirable way.
Instead of sewing sections of the shoe upper together, these sections may also be glued or welded (under heat or with ultrasound). Combinations of different connection techniques are possible. Basically, a different number and/or arrangement of sections of knitwear and corresponding joining seams is possible.
The knitwear of the soccer shoe shown in
Below the weldseam shown with the reference numeral 113, a plastic reinforcement may be arranged between the outer layer and the inner layer. Such a reinforcement may be arranged on the medial side, as well as on the lateral side of the soccer shoe. It is also possible that such reinforcements are located in the toe and/or heel regions of the soccer shoe.
Basically, the upper 51 and, in particular, the knitwear may be provided with profile elements which increase the friction between a soccer ball and soccer shoe 91 and/or which allow for a better control of the ball. DE 10 2012 207 300 A1 describes, for example, a method for connecting a profile element to an upper.
The sections of the soccer shoe 91 shown in
As shown in
Further, the soccer shoes 91a and 91b each comprise a sole 61 comprising a grid-shaped structure to increase traction with respect the ground. In the shown exemplary embodiments of
The two soccer shoes 91a and 91b comprise a midsole 171 from eTPU. The midsole 171 is arranged above the sole 61. eTPU is especially elastic, i.e. comprises high resilience. It maintains this property over a wide temperature range compared to e.g. EVA. Furthermore, eTPU comprises a considerably reduced abrasion than ordinary midsoles compared e.g. with EVA.
Each of the shoe uppers 51 of the soccer shoes 91a and 91b comprise a section 172 in the toe region, which is made from rubber and provided with an alveolar structure to increase friction with a soccer ball. The shoe upper 51 of soccer shoes 91a and 91b furthermore comprise knitwear in sections 173, which is able to couple the soccer shoe 91a, 91b to a foot of a wearer when wearing the shoe.
The shoe uppers 51 of the soccer shoes 91, 91a, and 91b shown in
A different course of the straps 201 and 202 according to requirements may be included in other embodiments. Also, a different number of straps may be used, for example, only one. The straps 201 and 202 may be laminated to the shoe upper 51. However, it is also possible to print the straps.
In the exemplary embodiments of
Further, some embodiments of the soccer shoe according to the invention may comprise a support element or support elements, e.g. one or more elastic straps to provide additional support in certain areas of the foot. For example, one support element may be arranged such that it extends from a medial side over a foot arranged in the soccer shoe to the lateral side of the soccer shoe.
The soccer shoe 91 according to certain embodiments of the invention described above may be manufactured with a method comprising the following steps: providing the sole 61, weft-knitting or warp-knitting the knitwear for the upper 51, such that the knitwear is capable of coupling the sole 61 to a foot of a wearer of the soccer shoe 91 while the soccer shoe 91 is worn and, finally, connecting the sole 61 to the upper 51. The provided sole 61 may be a rigid sole.
The knitwear may be weft-knitted or warp-knitted such that the knitwear may extend above an ankle of a foot while the soccer shoe 91 is worn. The step of weft-knitting or warp-knitting the knitwear may further comprise the steps of: weft-knitting or warp-knitting multiple weft-knitted or warp-knitted sections and joining the multiple weft-knitted or warp-knitted sections to form the knitwear.
The invention has been described in relation to soccer shoes. Basically, however, the invention is not restricted to soccer shoes, but may be applied to any kind of shoe, in particular a sports shoe. The invention may in particular be applied to climbing shoes, running shoes and shoes for ball sports. Further sports where the described invention may be used are yoga, rambling, trekking, hiking, tennis, cycling, football, rugby, baseball and volleyball, and activities on sports equipment such as for example cross trainers and steppers. The mentioned sports shoes, sports and activities are not to be understood as limiting.
In the following, further examples are described to facilitate the understanding of the invention:
Different arrangements of the components depicted in the drawings or described above, as well as components and steps not shown or described are possible. Similarly, some features and sub-combinations are useful and may be employed without reference to other features and sub-combinations. Embodiments of the invention have been described for illustrative and not restrictive purposes, and alternative embodiments will become apparent to readers of this patent. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above or depicted in the drawings, and various embodiments and modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the claims below.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2014 202 432.3 | Feb 2014 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 74962 | Wesson | Feb 1868 | A |
| 275142 | Carter | Apr 1883 | A |
| 299934 | Muller | Mar 1884 | A |
| 467091 | Gernshym | Jan 1892 | A |
| 578153 | Lamb | Mar 1897 | A |
| 601192 | Woodwide | Mar 1898 | A |
| 601894 | Lamb | Apr 1898 | A |
| D31023 | Olmsted | Jun 1899 | S |
| 757424 | Vohl | Apr 1904 | A |
| 951033 | Steber | Mar 1910 | A |
| 1215198 | Rothstein | Feb 1917 | A |
| 1346516 | Godfrey | Jul 1920 | A |
| 1370799 | Egerton | Mar 1921 | A |
| 1413314 | Bossworth | Apr 1922 | A |
| 1413537 | Jones | Apr 1922 | A |
| 1538263 | Ackerman | May 1925 | A |
| 1597934 | Stimpson | Aug 1926 | A |
| 1841518 | Bellak | Jan 1932 | A |
| 1888172 | Joha | Nov 1932 | A |
| 1902780 | Holden et al. | Mar 1933 | A |
| RE18804 | Joha | Apr 1933 | E |
| 1910251 | Joha | May 1933 | A |
| 1972609 | Arsdale et al. | Sep 1934 | A |
| 2001293 | Wilson | Apr 1935 | A |
| 2018275 | Jack | Oct 1935 | A |
| 2024180 | Parlante | Dec 1935 | A |
| 2038844 | Dorf | Apr 1936 | A |
| 2042146 | Deakin | May 1936 | A |
| 2047724 | Zuckerman | Jul 1936 | A |
| 2048294 | Roberts | Jul 1936 | A |
| 2069083 | Percy | Jan 1937 | A |
| 2076285 | Wiggin | Apr 1937 | A |
| 2126186 | Friedland | Aug 1938 | A |
| 2147197 | Glidden | Feb 1939 | A |
| 2150730 | Schuessler | Mar 1939 | A |
| 2165092 | Daniels | Jul 1939 | A |
| 2171654 | Ralph et al. | Sep 1939 | A |
| 2178941 | Schuessler | Nov 1939 | A |
| 2257390 | Roy | Sep 1941 | A |
| 2276920 | Charles et al. | Mar 1942 | A |
| 2292455 | Hollier et al. | Aug 1942 | A |
| 2297028 | Sheeler | Sep 1942 | A |
| 2302167 | Austin | Nov 1942 | A |
| 2314098 | Raymond | Mar 1943 | A |
| 2319141 | Kuehnel | May 1943 | A |
| 2330199 | Basch | Sep 1943 | A |
| 2343390 | Ushakoff | Mar 1944 | A |
| 2364134 | Dow et al. | Dec 1944 | A |
| 2391594 | Gaetano | Dec 1945 | A |
| 2400487 | Clark | May 1946 | A |
| 2400692 | Herbert | May 1946 | A |
| 2424957 | Schletter | Jul 1947 | A |
| 2440393 | Clark | Apr 1948 | A |
| 2460674 | Lajos | Feb 1949 | A |
| 2464301 | Carleton, Jr. | Mar 1949 | A |
| 2467237 | Sherman et al. | Apr 1949 | A |
| 2516697 | Haddad | Jul 1950 | A |
| 2538673 | Ansley | Jan 1951 | A |
| 2569764 | Jonas | Oct 1951 | A |
| 2584084 | Rubico | Jan 1952 | A |
| 2586045 | Hoza | Feb 1952 | A |
| 2603891 | Gustav | Jul 1952 | A |
| 2608078 | Anderson | Aug 1952 | A |
| 2623373 | Vogel | Dec 1952 | A |
| 2641004 | Whiting et al. | Jun 1953 | A |
| 2675631 | Doughty | Apr 1954 | A |
| 2679117 | Reed | May 1954 | A |
| 2701458 | Ducharme | Feb 1955 | A |
| 2712744 | Miller et al. | Jul 1955 | A |
| 2714813 | Roscoe | Aug 1955 | A |
| 2783631 | Sumner | Mar 1957 | A |
| 2811029 | Conner | Oct 1957 | A |
| 2848885 | Goodman | Aug 1958 | A |
| 2898754 | Harms | Aug 1959 | A |
| 2934839 | Servin | May 1960 | A |
| 2948132 | Gift | Aug 1960 | A |
| 2966785 | Goff et al. | Jan 1961 | A |
| 2983128 | Goff et al. | May 1961 | A |
| 2994322 | Cullen et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
| 3004354 | Kramer | Oct 1961 | A |
| 3013564 | Harold | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3015943 | Guy | Jan 1962 | A |
| 3035291 | Bingham, Jr. | May 1962 | A |
| 3063074 | Scholl | Nov 1962 | A |
| 3070909 | Hermann et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
| 3078699 | Huntley | Feb 1963 | A |
| 3093916 | Hiestand et al. | Jun 1963 | A |
| 3138880 | Kunzli | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3159988 | Reymes | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3217336 | Joseph | Nov 1965 | A |
| 3228819 | Bingham, Jr. | Jan 1966 | A |
| 3298204 | Hoffecker | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3324220 | Stansfield | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3370363 | Kaplan | Feb 1968 | A |
| 3416174 | Novitske | Dec 1968 | A |
| 3425246 | Knohl | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3550402 | Colton | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3583081 | Hayashi | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3616149 | Wincklhofer et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3620892 | Wincklhofer et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3635051 | Betts et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3656323 | Brown | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3694940 | Stohr | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3695063 | Betts et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3704474 | Winkler | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3766566 | Tadokoro et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3769723 | Masterson et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3778856 | Christie et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3785173 | Hanney et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3838583 | Rumi et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3863272 | Guille | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3867248 | Bauer | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3884052 | Findlay et al. | May 1975 | A |
| 3952427 | von den Benken et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3967390 | Anfruns | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3971234 | Taylor | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3972086 | Belli et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3985003 | Reed | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3985004 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 4027402 | Liu et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4028910 | Wignall et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4031586 | von den Benken et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4038699 | Burn | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4038840 | Castello | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4068395 | Senter | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4075383 | Anderson et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4111008 | Robinson et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4120101 | Drew | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4144727 | Duhl et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4183156 | Rudy et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4211806 | Civardi et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
| 4219945 | Rudy et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4232458 | Bartels | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4233758 | Auberry | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4255949 | Thorneburg | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4258480 | Famolare, Jr. | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4265954 | Romanek | May 1981 | A |
| 4276671 | Melton | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4279049 | Coiquaud | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4282657 | Antonious | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4306315 | Castiglia | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4306929 | Menikheim et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4317292 | Melton | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4324752 | Newton et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4354318 | Frederick et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4356643 | Kester et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4373361 | Thorneburg | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4430811 | Okada | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4447967 | Zaino | May 1984 | A |
| 4465448 | Aldridge et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4467626 | Coble et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4523346 | Auberry et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4531525 | Richards | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4592154 | Oatman | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4607439 | Harada | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4610685 | Raley | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4624115 | Safrit et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4642915 | Pfander | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4651354 | Petrey | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4663946 | Wright | May 1987 | A |
| 4669126 | Jones | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4682479 | Pernick | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4722202 | Imboden | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4729179 | Quist, Jr. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4737396 | Kamat et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4750339 | Simpson, Jr. et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4756098 | Boggia | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4783355 | Mueller | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4785558 | Shiomura | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4813158 | Brown | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4813161 | Lesley | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4852272 | Chilewich et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4899465 | Bleimhofer et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4941331 | Cournoyer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4960135 | Nelson | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5031423 | Ikenaga et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5095720 | Tibbals | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5117567 | Berger et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5125116 | Gaither et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5152025 | Hirmas et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5157791 | Woodson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5181278 | Peleg et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5192601 | Neisler | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5240773 | Dunn et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5253434 | Curley, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5291671 | Caberlotto et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5319807 | Brier | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5323627 | Lonati et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5343639 | Kilgore et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5345638 | Nishida | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5353523 | Kilgore et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5353524 | Brier | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5371957 | Gaudio et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5385036 | Spillane et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5388430 | Essig | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5426869 | Gore et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5461884 | McCartney et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5479791 | Osborne | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5484646 | Mann | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5505011 | Bleimhofer | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511323 | Dahlgren | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5513450 | Aviles | May 1996 | A |
| 5519894 | Imboden et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5526584 | Bleimhofer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5553468 | Osborne | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5560227 | Depoe et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5572860 | Mitsumoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575090 | Condini | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5581817 | Hicks | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592836 | Schuster et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5605060 | Osborne | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5606808 | Gilliard et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5623734 | Pugliatti | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623840 | Roell | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5709107 | Jeffcoat | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711093 | Aumann | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5711168 | Proctor et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5722262 | Proctor et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729918 | Smets et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735145 | Pernick | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5737857 | Aumann | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5737943 | Bernhardt | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746013 | Fay | May 1998 | A |
| 5765296 | Ludemann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774898 | Malpee | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784806 | Wendt | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5787503 | Murphy, III | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5791163 | Throneburg | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5836179 | Van Laar | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5850745 | Albright | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855123 | Albright | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5884419 | Davidowitz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5896608 | Whatley | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5896683 | Foxen et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5896758 | Rock et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5906007 | Roberts | May 1999 | A |
| 5996189 | Wang et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021585 | Cole | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6029376 | Cass | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6032387 | Johnson | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6052921 | Oreck | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6088936 | Bahl et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6109068 | Stoll et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6128835 | Ritter et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6151802 | Reynolds | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158253 | Svoboda et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6170175 | Funk et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173589 | Hayes, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6192717 | Rabinowicz | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196030 | Stoll et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6227010 | Roell | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6231946 | Brown, Jr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6250115 | Suzuki | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6272888 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6286233 | Gaither | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6287168 | Rabinowicz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6299962 | Davis et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6301759 | Langer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308438 | Throneburg et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6330814 | Fujiwara | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6333105 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6401364 | Burt et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6415632 | Vesnaver | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430844 | Otis | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6449878 | Lyden | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6539752 | Apollonio | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6558784 | Norton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6588237 | Cole et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6622312 | Rabinowicz | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6662469 | Urie et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6665955 | Mizrahi et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6708348 | Romay | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6735988 | Honeycutt | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6754983 | Hatfield et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6779369 | Shepherd | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6871515 | Starbuck et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6886367 | Mitchell et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6899591 | Mitchell | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6910288 | Dua | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6922917 | Kerns et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931762 | Dua | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6944975 | Safdeye et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6984596 | Dickerson | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6986183 | Delgorgue et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6986269 | Dua | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| D517297 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | S |
| 7016867 | Lyden | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7037571 | Fish et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7043942 | Chapman | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047668 | Burris | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051460 | Orei et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7055267 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7056402 | Koerwien et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7081221 | Paratore et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7107235 | Lyden | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7131296 | Dua | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7179414 | Safdeye et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7207125 | Jeppesen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7207196 | Lonati et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7207961 | Benton et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7240522 | Kondou et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7346935 | Patterson | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7347011 | Dua et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7356946 | Hannon et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7441348 | Dawson et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
| 7543397 | Kilgore et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7568298 | Kerns et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7637032 | Sokolowski | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7650705 | Donnadieu et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7677061 | Mori et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7682219 | Falla | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7721575 | Yokoyama | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7774956 | Dua et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7805860 | Fliri et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7814598 | Dua et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7854076 | Keppler et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7882648 | Langvin | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 8028440 | Sokolowski et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8042288 | Dua et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8099881 | Yamamoto | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8196317 | Dua et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8209883 | Lyden | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8215132 | Dua et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225530 | Sokolowski et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8266749 | Dua et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8296970 | Jessiman | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| D673765 | Parker et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
| 8448474 | Tatler et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8464383 | Sing | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8490299 | Dua et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8522577 | Huffa | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8590345 | Sokolowski et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8595878 | Farris et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8621891 | Shaffer et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8647460 | Koo | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8650916 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8683718 | Fliri et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8701232 | Droege et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8745895 | Sokolowski et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8745896 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8800172 | Dua et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8839532 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8881430 | Baines et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8898932 | Molyneux et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8899079 | Podhajny et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8959800 | Sokolowski et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8959959 | Podhajny et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8973410 | Podhajny et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 8978422 | Podhajny et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8997529 | Podhajny et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 8997530 | Podhajny | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9003836 | Podhajny et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9010157 | Podhajny et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
| 9027260 | Shaffer et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9032763 | Meir et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9060562 | Meir et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9072335 | Podhajny | Jul 2015 | B1 |
| 9078488 | Podhajny et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
| 9084449 | Huffman et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9095187 | Molyneux et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9132601 | Beye et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9139938 | Podhajny et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9145629 | Podhajny | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9150986 | Shaffer et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9192204 | Klug et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9226540 | Podhajny et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9297097 | Turner | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9301567 | Roulo et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9339076 | Podhajny et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9353469 | Meir et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9357813 | Lyden | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9365959 | Turner | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9375046 | Meir | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9398784 | Baudouin et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9498023 | Binder | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9723890 | Long | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 20010016993 | Cagner | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024709 | Yoneda et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010032399 | Litchfield et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010054240 | Bordin et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010055684 | Davis et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020000002 | Hatch et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020002780 | Barthelemy et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020007570 | Girard | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020012784 | Norton et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026730 | Whatley | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035796 | Knoche et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053148 | Haimerl | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020078599 | Delgorgue et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020092199 | Fish et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020148142 | Oorei et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020148258 | Cole et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152638 | Safdeye et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157281 | Safdeye et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009908 | Sheets et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009919 | Stein | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030033837 | Higgins | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030039882 | Wruck et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030051372 | Lyden | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030069807 | Lyden | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079374 | Belley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030097766 | Morgan | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030106171 | Issler | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121179 | Chen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126762 | Tseng | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131499 | Silverman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030191427 | Jay et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030192351 | Meckley et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226280 | Paratore et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030227105 | Paratore et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040009731 | Rabinowicz | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045955 | Rock et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083622 | Mizrahi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040107603 | Wei | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111920 | Cretinon | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111921 | Lenormand | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118018 | Dua | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139628 | Wiener | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040139629 | Wiener | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143995 | McClelland | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040163280 | Morris et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181972 | Csorba | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040198178 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040205982 | Challe | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216332 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226113 | Wright et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255486 | Pawlus et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040261467 | Chapman | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050016023 | Burris et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050028405 | Wilson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055843 | Morlacchi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050081402 | Orei et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091725 | Alley et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050102863 | Hannon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108898 | Jeppesen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115281 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050115284 | Dua | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050127057 | Rock et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050138845 | Haimerl | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155137 | Berger | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050166426 | Donnadieu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050166427 | Greene et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050193592 | Dua et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050208857 | Baron et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268497 | Alfaro et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273988 | Christy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284000 | Kerns | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060006168 | Rock et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060016099 | Marco et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060021258 | Beck | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060048413 | Sokolowski et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059715 | Aveni | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059716 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117607 | Pare et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060130359 | Dua et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060162187 | Byrnes et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060179549 | Huggins et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060243000 | Turlan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000027 | Ganzoni et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070003728 | Hannon et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070022627 | Sokolowski et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070074334 | Steel et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144039 | Fliri | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180730 | Greene et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234593 | Beck | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271817 | Ellis, III | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080000108 | Ellis, III | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010860 | Gyr | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080017294 | Bailey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032580 | Fukuoka et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080066499 | Andrieu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080078102 | Kilgore et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110048 | Dua et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110049 | Sokolowski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080189830 | Egglesfield et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250668 | Marvin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080263893 | Hernandez et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080295230 | Wright et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313939 | Ardill et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090068908 | Hinchcliff et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090071036 | Hooper et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090107012 | Cheney et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090126225 | Jarvis | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090126229 | Fuerst et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134145 | Rock et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090172971 | Peikert et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090241374 | Sato et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090297794 | Lin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100018075 | Meschter et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100043253 | Dojan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100051132 | Glenn et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100064453 | Haimerl | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107346 | Aveni | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107443 | Aveni | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100154256 | Dua | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100162590 | Bonigk | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170651 | Scherb et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100175276 | Dojan et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100269372 | Dua et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299962 | Fliri | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110030244 | Motawi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061149 | Polacco et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110061265 | Lyden | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078921 | Greene et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110088282 | Dojan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154689 | Chung | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110154693 | Oberschneider | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179677 | Jessiman et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219643 | Tai | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110283567 | Yin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110302727 | Sokolowski et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110302810 | Borel et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308108 | Berns et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110308110 | Berns | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120023686 | Huffa et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023778 | Dojan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120055044 | Dojan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120090077 | Brown et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120114883 | Kapur et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120144699 | Eggert et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120159813 | Dua et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120180195 | Shull et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120198730 | Burch et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120204448 | Bracken | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216423 | Lyden | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120216430 | Stohr | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233878 | Hazenberg et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233879 | Dojan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233880 | Chao et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233882 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233883 | Spencer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233884 | Greene | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233885 | Shaffer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233886 | Madore et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233887 | Baker et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120233888 | Baker et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234051 | Huffa | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234052 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234111 | Molyneux et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120234467 | Rapaport et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235322 | Greene et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120238376 | Knight et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120238910 | Nordstrom | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120240429 | Sokolowski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120246973 | Dua | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120255201 | Little | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120272548 | Downard et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120279260 | Dua et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120285039 | Lazaris et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120285043 | Dua et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120297557 | Koo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120297642 | Schaefer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120297643 | Shaffer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120297645 | Berbert et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120318026 | Dua et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130031801 | Hatfield et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130036629 | Bramani et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130047471 | Liang | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130055590 | Mokos | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130061405 | Haimerl | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130091741 | Frank | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130118031 | Chenciner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130139407 | Brongers et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130145652 | Podhajny et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130152424 | Dojan | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130160323 | Hsiao | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130174449 | Koyess et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219749 | Dojan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130232820 | Bramani et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239438 | Dua et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130255103 | Dua et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130260104 | Dua et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130260629 | Dua et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130269209 | Lang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140068968 | Podhajny et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140082965 | Greene et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140101824 | Spanks et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140123409 | Huffa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130373 | Baines et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130374 | Minami et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130375 | Baines et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140130376 | Fahmi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140137433 | Craig et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140137434 | Craig | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140144190 | Tatler et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140150292 | Podhajny | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140150295 | Dua et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140150296 | Dua et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140157831 | Huffa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140196314 | Beye et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140209233 | Dua et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140237855 | Podhajny et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140237856 | Podhajny et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140238082 | Meir et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140238083 | Meir et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245544 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245546 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245547 | Molyneux et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245633 | Podhajny et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245634 | Podhajny et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245636 | Seamarks et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245637 | Fahmi et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245639 | Dua et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245643 | Huffa et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140310983 | Tamm et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140310984 | Tamm et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140310985 | Tran et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140310986 | Tamm et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140338226 | Zavala | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140352082 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140352173 | Bell et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150013080 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150013188 | Baines et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150013394 | Huffa | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150013395 | Huffa | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150040431 | Molyneux et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150047225 | Dealey et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150059209 | Dekovic | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150059211 | Podhajny et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150075031 | Podhajny et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150101212 | Dekovic et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150143716 | Savage et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150143720 | Avar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216254 | Podhajny et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216255 | Podhajny | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216257 | Meir et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150250256 | Podhajny et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150264995 | Hilderbrand, IV | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150272261 | Huffman et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150342285 | Bell et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150359290 | Podhajny et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150366293 | Clarkson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160029736 | Meir | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160088894 | Podhajny et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160088899 | Klug et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160090670 | Meir | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160095377 | Tamm | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160198797 | Ikenaka | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206039 | Cross et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206040 | Cross et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206042 | Cross et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160206046 | Cross | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160295971 | Arnese et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170156434 | Tamm et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170311650 | Hupperets et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180064201 | Tran et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 386324 | Oct 1988 | AT |
| 989720 | May 1976 | CA |
| 2387640 | Apr 2003 | CA |
| 2044806 | Sep 1989 | CN |
| 1067566 | Jan 1993 | CN |
| 2187379 | Jan 1995 | CN |
| 2438730 | Jul 2001 | CN |
| 1392833 | Jan 2003 | CN |
| 1411762 | Apr 2003 | CN |
| 1429512 | Jul 2003 | CN |
| 1155597 | Jun 2004 | CN |
| 1960650 | May 2007 | CN |
| 101316526 | Dec 2008 | CN |
| 201356120 | Dec 2009 | CN |
| 102939023 | Feb 2013 | CN |
| 104413996 | Mar 2015 | CN |
| 71153 | Apr 1893 | DE |
| 627878 | Jul 1936 | DE |
| 870963 | Mar 1953 | DE |
| 1736512 | Dec 1956 | DE |
| 1785183 | Mar 1959 | DE |
| 1084173 | Jun 1960 | DE |
| 1910713 | Jul 1970 | DE |
| 1785183 | Nov 1971 | DE |
| 2044031 | Mar 1972 | DE |
| 1685690 | Jan 1973 | DE |
| 2162456 | Jun 1973 | DE |
| 2305693 | Aug 1973 | DE |
| 2505537 | Aug 1976 | DE |
| 2801984 | Jul 1979 | DE |
| 3820094 | Dec 1989 | DE |
| 4400739 | Jul 1995 | DE |
| 68922952 | Nov 1995 | DE |
| 4419802 | Dec 1995 | DE |
| 4419803 | Dec 1995 | DE |
| 4441555 | Jun 1996 | DE |
| 19629317 | Oct 1997 | DE |
| 19738433 | Apr 1998 | DE |
| 19728848 | Jan 1999 | DE |
| 4443002 | Feb 1999 | DE |
| 19855542 | Jun 2000 | DE |
| 19910785 | Sep 2000 | DE |
| 10022254 | Nov 2001 | DE |
| 10037728 | Feb 2002 | DE |
| 10145073 | Apr 2003 | DE |
| 10228143 | Nov 2003 | DE |
| 3903242 | Jul 2004 | DE |
| 4138836 | Jul 2004 | DE |
| 19910785 | Dec 2004 | DE |
| 602004000536 | Dec 2006 | DE |
| 102005030651 | Jan 2007 | DE |
| 10316979 | Feb 2007 | DE |
| 60031821 | Sep 2007 | DE |
| 102006009974 | Sep 2007 | DE |
| 102006022494 | Nov 2007 | DE |
| 202007011165 | Jan 2008 | DE |
| 202009010225 | Feb 2010 | DE |
| 202009011928 | Feb 2010 | DE |
| 102009018942 | Nov 2010 | DE |
| 102009028627 | Mar 2011 | DE |
| 102010037585 | Mar 2012 | DE |
| 102011055154 | May 2012 | DE |
| 202012100938 | May 2012 | DE |
| 202007019490 | Jan 2013 | DE |
| 202009018763 | Apr 2013 | DE |
| 202009018765 | Apr 2013 | DE |
| 102012206062 | Oct 2013 | DE |
| 202012013113 | Nov 2014 | DE |
| 202012013114 | Nov 2014 | DE |
| 202012013118 | Nov 2014 | DE |
| 202012013119 | Nov 2014 | DE |
| 202012013120 | Nov 2014 | DE |
| 0037629 | Oct 1981 | EP |
| 45372 | Feb 1982 | EP |
| 0105773 | Apr 1984 | EP |
| 279950 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0384059 | Aug 1990 | EP |
| 446583 | Sep 1991 | EP |
| 0472743 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 499710 | Aug 1992 | EP |
| 508712 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0664092 | Jul 1995 | EP |
| 448714 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 728860 | Aug 1996 | EP |
| 0733732 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 758693 | Feb 1997 | EP |
| 845553 | Jun 1998 | EP |
| 864681 | Sep 1998 | EP |
| 898002 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 0959704 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1004829 | May 2000 | EP |
| 1031656 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1091033 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 0758693 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 0833000 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1219191 | Jul 2002 | EP |
| 1233091 | Aug 2002 | EP |
| 1273693 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1275761 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1437057 | Jul 2004 | EP |
| 1148161 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1563752 | Aug 2005 | EP |
| 1602762 | Dec 2005 | EP |
| 1352118 | Oct 2006 | EP |
| 1972706 | Sep 2008 | EP |
| 2023762 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 2079336 | Jul 2009 | EP |
| 2088887 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 1571938 | Nov 2009 | EP |
| 2248434 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2378910 | Oct 2011 | EP |
| 1919321 | Aug 2012 | EP |
| 2485619 | Aug 2012 | EP |
| 2520188 | Nov 2012 | EP |
| 1571938 | May 2013 | EP |
| 2088887 | May 2013 | EP |
| 2591694 | May 2013 | EP |
| 2649898 | Oct 2013 | EP |
| 2716177 | Jul 2014 | EP |
| 2803283 | Jan 2015 | EP |
| 2904920 | Aug 2015 | EP |
| 2952346 | Dec 2015 | EP |
| 2977205 | Jan 2016 | EP |
| 2686467 | Apr 2016 | EP |
| 2713793 | Jun 2016 | EP |
| 2505092 | Aug 2016 | EP |
| 858875 | Dec 1940 | FR |
| 862088 | Feb 1941 | FR |
| 2171172 | Sep 1973 | FR |
| 2491739 | Sep 1982 | FR |
| 2506576 | Dec 1984 | FR |
| 2504786 | Jan 1986 | FR |
| 2648684 | Dec 1990 | FR |
| 2776485 | Apr 2000 | FR |
| 2780619 | Sep 2000 | FR |
| 2784550 | Jan 2001 | FR |
| 2848807 | Jul 2013 | FR |
| 109091 | Aug 1917 | GB |
| 273968 | Jul 1927 | GB |
| 323457 | Jan 1930 | GB |
| 413279 | Jul 1934 | GB |
| 538865 | Aug 1941 | GB |
| 674835 | Jul 1952 | GB |
| 761519 | Nov 1956 | GB |
| 782562 | Sep 1957 | GB |
| 832518 | Apr 1960 | GB |
| 1102447 | Feb 1968 | GB |
| 1219433 | Jan 1971 | GB |
| 1328693 | Aug 1973 | GB |
| 1539886 | Feb 1979 | GB |
| 2018837 | Oct 1979 | GB |
| 1572493 | Jul 1980 | GB |
| 1581999 | Dec 1980 | GB |
| 1603487 | Nov 1981 | GB |
| 2044073 | Mar 1983 | GB |
| 2131677 | Jun 1984 | GB |
| 2133273 | Jul 1984 | GB |
| 2214939 | Apr 1992 | GB |
| 317184 | Aug 2003 | GB |
| 413017 | Jul 2004 | GB |
| 2408190 | May 2005 | GB |
| S39-16845 | Jun 1939 | JP |
| S59-166706 | Nov 1984 | JP |
| S63-057909 | Apr 1988 | JP |
| 02079336 | Mar 1990 | JP |
| H02-116806 | Sep 1990 | JP |
| H03-033203 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| H05-176804 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| H06-068722 | Mar 1994 | JP |
| 06113905 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| H06-154001 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| H06-248501 | Sep 1994 | JP |
| H06-296507 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| H0759604 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| H07-148004 | Jun 1995 | JP |
| H07-246101 | Sep 1995 | JP |
| 08109553 | Apr 1996 | JP |
| H09 047302 | Feb 1997 | JP |
| H09-238701 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| H10-000103 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| H10-130991 | May 1998 | JP |
| H10-155504 | Jun 1998 | JP |
| H10-179209 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| H03-064834 | May 1999 | JP |
| H11-229253 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 11302943 | Nov 1999 | JP |
| 2000-015732 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000-279201 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2001017206 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001-104091 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-164407 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2001-164444 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2002-088512 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002146654 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2004-230151 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2004-283586 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2006-150064 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 2006-249586 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 3865307 | Jan 2007 | JP |
| 2007204864 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2007236612 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 2007239151 | Sep 2007 | JP |
| 4376792 | Dec 2009 | JP |
| 2010-030289 | Feb 2010 | JP |
| 2010-163712 | Jul 2010 | JP |
| 2010-275649 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2011-256506 | Dec 2011 | JP |
| 2012-500071 | Jan 2012 | JP |
| 4851688 | Jan 2012 | JP |
| 2012062615 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2012512698 | Jun 2012 | JP |
| 2012-522551 | Sep 2012 | JP |
| 2012533404 | Dec 2012 | JP |
| 2013-151783 | Aug 2013 | JP |
| 2015-025223 | Feb 2015 | JP |
| 7304678 | Oct 1974 | NL |
| 7505389 | Nov 1975 | NL |
| 9003744 | Apr 1990 | WO |
| 9221806 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| 9843506 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| 9914415 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| 9943229 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| 0032861 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0033694 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| 0112003 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| 0112004 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| 0231247 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| 0241721 | May 2002 | WO |
| 02072325 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| 2004064558 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2004066770 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| 2004098333 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| 2005004656 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| 2005025841 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005055754 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| 2005074737 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2007005459 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2009143000 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| 2010020391 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010090923 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| 2011108954 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| 2011138639 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2012018731 | Feb 2012 | WO |
| 2012125473 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012125483 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012125490 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2012138488 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| 2012151408 | Nov 2012 | WO |
| 2012166602 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2012166607 | Dec 2012 | WO |
| 2013126314 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| 2013192363 | Dec 2013 | WO |
| 2014078152 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014078158 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014078160 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014078161 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014081680 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014085205 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2014085206 | Jun 2014 | WO |
| 2014113352 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| 2014134236 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014134237 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014134239 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014134242 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014134244 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014134247 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2014137825 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| 2015030914 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| 2015076893 | May 2015 | WO |
| 2015134648 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| 2016018904 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| ISO 8117:2003(E), “Textile Machinery—Knitting Machines—Nominal diameters of circular machines”, Second Edition, Feb. 15, 2003, 6 pages. |
| Burall, Paul, “CoID Design Awards”, Design, Jun. 1969, pp. 46-47. |
| IPR2016-00920, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,042,288 filed Apr. 19, 2016, 67 pages. |
| IPR2016-00920, Exhibit 1003, Declaration of Lenny M. Holden, Apr. 19, 2016, 166 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,814,598 filed Apr. 19, 2016, 57 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922, Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,266,749 filed Apr. 19, 2016, 67 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 and IPR-00922, Exhibit 1003, Declaration of Lenny M. Holden, Apr. 19, 2016, 154 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 201510071264.0, Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2016, 9 pages (No English translation available. A summary of the Office Action is provided in the Transmittal Letter submitted herewith). |
| “From Fiber to Fabric: Silk”, Clothing and Textiles, Utah State University Cooperative Extension, http://extension.usu.edu./tiles/publications/factsheet/FC_Clothing&Textiles_2012-25pr.pdf, 2011, 3 pages. |
| Robert M. Lyden v. adidas America, Inc., adidas AG, adidas International Marketing B.V., The Finish Line, Inc., and Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., “Original Complaint”, Case No. 3:14-CV-1586 MO, United States District Court, District of Oregon, Portland Division, filed Oct. 8, 2014, 54 pages. |
| Freshness Magazine (Youtube Video), “The Story Behind Nike Flyknit Technology”, http://web.archive.org/web/20120225004803/http://www.freshnessmag.com/2012/02/21/the-story-behind-nike-flyknit-technology-video, published on Feb. 21, 2012, 3 pages (website screenshot submitted). |
| Reissue U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,094, “Patent Owner's Rebuttal Brief”, filed Sep. 3, 2014, 40 pages. |
| Reissue U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,094, “Patent Owner's Rebuttal Brief ”, filed Sep. 22, 2014, 25 pages. |
| Underwood, Jenny, “The Design of 3D Shape Knitted Preforms”, Ph.D. Thesis for School of Fashion and Textile, Design and Social Context Portfolio, RMIT University, Nov. 2009, 201 pages. |
| European Application No. 15154607.4, Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 20, 2015, 9 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,668, Tamm et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,706, Tran et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,719, Tamm et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,737, Tamm et al. |
| Page 1 of Lyden Letter dated Apr. 21, 2010, redacted. |
| Eberle et al., Excerpt from Clothing Technology, 2002, 3 pages. |
| Compendium Warp Knitting, Sonderdruck, Karl Mayer GmbH, Aug. 1, 1978, 8 pages. |
| Duolastic—an elastic fabric sets new standards, HKS 1 MSU E-Magazine—weft elastic tricot machine, Sonderdruck, Karl Mayer GmbH, Aug. 4, 1989, 8 pages. |
| Fabric Pictures, www.karlmayer.com, Karl Mayer GmbH, undated, 7 pages. |
| Jacquard Rashchel machine for the Production of Curtains, Karl Mayer GmbH, Jan. 12, 1996, 4 pages. |
| Knitting Wear, SM8 Top 1, Santoni S.p.A. undated, 2 pages. |
| MRSS 42 SU: for producing the finest laces with ground in 22 dtex monofilaments, Sonderdruck, Karl Mayer GmbH, Aug. 4, 1988, 3 pages. |
| Multibar Jacquard Raschel Machine for Lace, Net Curtains and Patterned Elastic Products, Sonderdruck, Karl Mayer GmbH, Aug. 4, 1978, 6 pages. |
| Exhibit 2008, Decision on Appeal in Reexam U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,320, filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 28, 2012, 37 pages. |
| Anand et al., Technical Fabric Structures—2. Knitted Fabrics, Handbook of Technical Textiles, Woodhead Publishing, 2000, 5 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 2005800066703, Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2008, 17 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 2005800066703, Office Action dated Jul. 27, 2007, 18 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 2005800066703, Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2009, 19 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 2005800066703, Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2008, 6 pages. |
| Chinese Patent Application No. 2009101783949, Office Action dated May 13, 2011, 13 pages. |
| German Patent Application No. 102014202432.3, First Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2015, 5 pages (no English translation available—summary provided in Transmittal Letter submitted herewith). |
| Ebrlle et al., Clothing Technology, Sixth German Edition and Third English Edition, Veriag Europa-Lehrmittel, Nourney, Vollmer GmbH & Co., D-42781 Haa-Guriten, ISBN 3-8085-6223-4, Nov. 28, 2012, 3 pages. |
| Exhibit 2004, R. Shishoo, Chapter 16 of Textiles in Sport, filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 28, 2012, 22 pages. |
| Decision Institution of Inter Partes Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.108, filed in IPR2013-00067 on May 17, 2013, 38 pages. |
| Decision Motion to Withdraw § 42.10(e) filed in IPR2013-00067 on Oct. 30, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Exhibit 1001, Declaration and Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Edward C. Frederick filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 28, 2012, 178 pages. |
| Exhibit 2002, Declaration Edward C. Frederick with note filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 23 pages. |
| Exhibit 2010, Declaration of Raymond Tonkel filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 101 pages. |
| Exhibit 2009, Edward Frederick Deposition Transcript filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jul. 23, 2013, 187 pages. |
| Exhibit 2013, Errata Sheet from Edward Frederick Deposition filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 29, 2013, 1 page. |
| Exhibit 2012, Excerpts from Man-Made Fiber and Textile Dictionary filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Exhibit 1015, Cross Examination Deposition of Raymond Tonkel filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 114 pages. |
| Exhibit 1016, Declaration of Sabut Adanur Ph.D. filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 57 pages. |
| Exhibit 1017, Excerpt of Knitted Fabrics filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 73 pages. |
| Exhibit 1018, Excerpt of Bharat J. Gaijar, Wrap Knit Fabrics filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 16 pages. |
| Exhibit 1019, J. Watel, the Milanese Machine: Little Progress Made in Development of Milanese Fabric filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Exhibit 1023, Supplemental Declaration of Edward C. Frederick filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 18 pages. |
| Exhibit 1024, Billy Hunter, Editor Viewpoint: Nike Flyknit: Quantum Leap for Flat Knitting filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Exhibit 1025, Billy Hunter, Editor Viewpoint: Nike Flyknit: Ready, Steady, Go filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Exhibit 2007, U.S. Pat. No. 7,347,011 with markings filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 22 pages. |
| Exhibit 2015, Excerpts from Celanese Corporation Man-Made Fiber and Textile Dictionary filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 11, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Exhibit 2016, Excerpts from Hoechst Celanese “Dictionary of Fiber & Textile Technology” filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 11, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Exhibit 2017, Excerpts from Celanese Corporation Man-Made Fiber and Textile Dictionary filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 11, 2013, 10 pages. |
| Exhibit 2018, Excerpts from Hoechst Celanese Dictionary of Fiber & Textile Technology filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 11, 2013, 11 pages. |
| Exhibit 2020, transcript of Dec. 3, 2013, second cross-examination deposition of Edward C. Frederick filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 11, 2013, 59 pages. |
| Exhibit 2021, transcript of Dec. 3, 2013, cross-examination deposition of Sabit Adanur filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 11, 2013, 139 pages. |
| Exhibit 2022, signature page for transcript of Dec. 3, 2013, Frederick deposition (Ex. 2020) filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jan. 7, 2014, 1 page. |
| Exhibit 2023, signature page for transcript of Dec. 3, 2013, Adanur deposition (Ex. 2021) filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jan. 7, 2014, 1 page. |
| Exhibit 3001 filed in IPR2013-00067 on Apr. 28, 2014, 3 pages. |
| Exhibit 3002 filed in IPR2013-00067 on Apr. 28, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Exhibit 1003, File History for U.S. Pat. No. 7,347,011, filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 28, 2012, 201 pages. |
| Final Written Decision filed in IPR2013-00067 on Apr. 28, 2014, 43 pages. |
| Exhibit 1026, IDS under 37 C.F.R. 1.501 filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 2 pages. |
| Nike, Inc. Notice of Appeal filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jun. 30, 2014, 5 pages. |
| Nike's Motion to Amend filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 19 pages. |
| Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 4, 2012, 8 pages. |
| Oral Hearing Transcript filed in IPR2013-00067 on Mar. 5, 2014, 41 pages. |
| Order Conduct of the Proceeding filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jun. 19, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Order Conduct of the Proceeding filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 2, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Order Conduct of the Proceeding § 4.25 filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jan. 23, 2014, 3 pages. |
| Order Trial Hearing filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jan. 13, 2014, 4 pages. |
| Patent Owner Corrected Certificate of Service filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Patent Owner Opposition to Motion to Exclude filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jan. 21, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Motion to Amend U.S. Pat. No. 7,347,011 filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 19 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition filed in IPR2013-00067 on Feb. 28, 2013, 8 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Reply to Petitioner's Opposition to Motion to Amend filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 11, 2013, 9 pages. |
| Patent Owner's Trial Hearing Demonstratives filed in IPR2013-00067 on Feb. 6, 2014, 47 pages. |
| Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 CFR 42.100 et seq. filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 28, 2012, 66 pages. |
| Petitioner's Amended Notice of Cross Examination of Raymond Tonkel filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 1, 2013, 3 pages. |
| Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Motion to Amend filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 20 pages. |
| Petitioner's Motion to Exclude Evidence filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jan. 17, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner Motion to Amend filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 20 pages. |
| Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Exclude Evidence filed in IPR2013-00067 on Jan. 28, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Exhibit 2012, Random House Webster Dictionary Excerpts filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 4 pages. |
| Revised Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 filed in IPR2013-00067 on Dec. 10, 2012, 64 pages. |
| Submission of Patent Owner's Trial Hearing Demonstratives filed in IPR2013-00067 on Feb. 6, 2014, 3 pages. |
| Supplemental Declaration Edward C. Frederick filed in IPR2013-00067 on Nov. 12, 2013, 18 pages. |
| Exhibit 2006, U.S. Pat. No. 2,147,197 with markings filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 5 pages. |
| Exhibit 2003, U.S. Pat. No. 4,354,318 filed in IPR2013-00067 on Aug. 19, 2013, 6 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/004776, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2005, 15 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/056795, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 20, 2010, 16 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/028534, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 17, 2013, 8 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/028534, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 17, 2012, 14 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/028559, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2012, 9 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/028576, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 17, 2013, 7 pages. |
| PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/028576, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 1, 2012, 10 pages. |
| Spencer, “Knitting Technology”, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 1989 and 2001, 413 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067, Excerpts from Man-Made Fiber and Textile Dictionary, Exhibit 2011, Nov. 27, 2013, 12 pages. |
| Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201510071264.0, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 ET SEQ. with Exhibit 1003, Declaration of Lenny M. Holden, Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00263, Nov. 14, 2016. |
| Petition for Inter Partes Review Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.100 ET SEQ. with Exhibit 1003, Declaration of Lenny M. Holden, Inter Partes Review No. 2017-00264, Nov. 14, 2016. |
| Photograph of Adizero Prime SP Olympia, 2012. |
| Photograph of Adios, 2012. |
| Buckley et al., “New Textile Concepts for Use in Control of Body Environments”, Presented at RTO HFM Symposium on “Blowing Hot and Cold: Protecting Against Climatic Extremes”, Dresden, Germany, Oct. 8-10, 2001, 7 pages. |
| Hong et al., “The Development of 3D Shaped Knitted Fabrics for Technical Purposes on a Flat Knitting Machine”, Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, vol. 19, pp. 189-194, Sep. 1994, 6 pages. |
| Lu et al. , “The Development of the Flat-Knitted Shaped Uppers Based on Ergonomics”, AUTEX Research Journal, vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 67-74, Jun. 2016, 8 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 14-1719 , Federal Circuit Mandate to PTAB, Apr. 4, 2016, 1 page. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 14-1719 , United States Patent and Trademark Office's Solicitor's Brief to Federal Circuit, Apr. 9, 2015, 27 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 14-1719 , Appellant's Reply Brief, May 27, 2015, 38 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 14-1719 , Federal Circuit Decision, Feb. 11, 2016, 41 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 14-1719 , Appellant's Opening Brief to Federal Circuit, Dec. 15, 2014, 47 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 14-1719 , Appellee's Response Brief to Federal Circuit, Apr. 10, 2015, 76 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 18-1180 & 18-1181 , Appellant's Reply in Support of Motion to Remand, Jun. 5, 2018, 16 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 18-1180 & 18-1181 , Appellant's Motion for Remand to PTAB, May 24, 2018, 19 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 18-1180 & 18-1181 , Appellee's Opposition to Motion to Remand to PTAB, Jun. 1, 2018, 21 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 18-1180 & 18-1181 , Federal Circuit Decision to Remand to PTAB, Jul. 2, 2018, 4 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 18-1180 & 18-1181 , Appellant's Reply Brief, May 1, 2018, 41 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 18-1180 & 18-1181 , Appellee's Corrected Response Brief, Apr. 12, 2018, 75 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 18-1180 & 18-1181 , Appellant's Opening Brief, Feb. 26, 2018, 79 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Patent Owner's Response Brief, Nov. 16, 2017, 12 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Petitioner's Opening Brief, Nov. 6, 2017, 12 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Exhibit 1027, Petitioner's Oral Hearing Demonstratives Slides, 25 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Exhibit 3003, Email regarding Aqua Products Conference Call, 3 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Order Conduct of Remand Proceeding, Aug. 10, 2016, 4 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, Jun. 30, 2014, 5 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Petitioner's Reply Brief on Remand, Nov. 22, 2017, 6 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Decision on Remand, Sep. 18, 2018, 65 pages. |
| IPR2016-00920 , Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, Oct. 20, 2016, 8 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Petitioners Brief Addressing Newly Instituted Ground, Sep. 10, 2018, 12 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Order Modifying Institution Decision and Granting Request for Additional Briefing, Aug. 24, 2018, 14 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Patent Owner's Response Brief Addressing the Newly Instituted Ground, Sep. 24, 2018, 14 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review, Oct. 21, 2016, 24 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner Response, Apr. 21, 2017, 32 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Patent Owner's Objection to Admissability of Evidence, Apr. 28, 2017, 4 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Petitioner's Notice of Supplemental Evidence in Response to Patent Owner's Objection to Evidence, May 12, 2017, 4 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Petitioner's Notice of Appeal, Nov. 13, 2017, 4 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Final Written Decision, dated Oct. 19, 2017, 49 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Patent Owner's Response Brief, Jan. 23, 2017, 64 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 & IPR2016-00922 , Exhibit 1014, Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition of Impart, Apr. 10, 2017, 11 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 & IPR2016-00922 , Exhibit 2004, Transcript of Deposition of Lenny Holden, Jan. 10, 2017, 226 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 & IPR2016-00922 , Exhibit 3001, Random House Webster's College Dictionary Definition of Impart and Texture, Apr. 1999, 4 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 & IPR2016-00922 , Record of Oral Hearing, Jul. 26, 2017, 74 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 & IPR2016-00922 , Exhibit 1013, Analyzing the Color, Design and Texture of Fabric, 8 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 & IPR2016-00922 , Exhibit 1016, Adidas's Oral Hearing Demonstratives, Jul. 12, 2017, 84 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Petitioner's Brief Addressing Newly Instituted Ground, Sep. 10, 2018, 12 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Order Modifying Institution Decision and Granting for Additional Briefing, Aug. 24, 2018, 14 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Patent Owner's Response Brief Addressing Newly Instituted Ground, Sep. 24, 2018, 14 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review, Oct. 21, 2016, 24 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Petitioner's Reply Brief, Apr. 21, 2017, 34 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Patent Owner's Objection to Admissability of Evidence, Apr. 28, 2017, 4 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Petitioner's Notice of Supplemental Evidence in Response to Patent Owner's Objections to Evidence 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(B)(1), May 12, 2017, 4 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Petitioner's Notice of Appeal, Nov. 13, 2017, 4 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Final Written Decision, dated Oct. 19, 2017, 52 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Patent Owner's Response Brief, Jan. 23, 2017, 66 pages. |
| IPR2017-00263 , Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, Jun. 7, 2017, 11 pages. |
| IPR2017-00263 , Decision Denying Request for Rehearing, Jul. 20, 2017, 12 pages. |
| IPR2017-00263 , Petitioner's Request for Rehearing, Jul. 7, 2017, 17 pages. |
| IPR2017-00263 , Patent Owner's Corrected Preliminary Response, Mar. 27, 2017, 24 pages. |
| IPR2017-00263 , Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, Mar. 9, 2017, 24 pages. |
| IPR2017-00264 , Decision Denying Request for Rehearing, Jul. 20, 2017, 12 pages. |
| IPR2017-00264 , Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, Jun. 7, 2017, 12 pages. |
| IPR2017-00264 , Petitioner's Request for Rehearing, Jul. 7, 2017, 17 pages. |
| IPR2017-00264 , Patent Owner's Corrected Preliminary Response, Mar. 27, 2017, 24 pages. |
| IPR2017-00264 , Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, Mar. 9, 2017, 24 pages. |
| “Knitting Machine Wins Design Award—The Textile Institute & Industry”, EBSCO Host,Textile Institute & Industry, vol. 7, Issue 7, Jul. 1969, 3 pages. |
| “Polyamide 6.6 Emana Yarn”, 5 pages. |
| Aibibu et al., “Textile Cell-free Scaffolds for in Situ Tissue Engineering Applications”, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 27, No. 3, Mar. 2016, 20 pages. |
| Atalay et al., “Knitted Strain Sensors: Impact of Design Parameters on Sensing Properties”, Sensors, vol. 14, No. 3, 2014, 8 pages. |
| Atalay et al., “Textile-Based Weft Knitted Strain Sensors: Effect of Fabric Parameters on Sensor Properties , Sensors (Basel)”, vol. 13, No. 8, Aug. 21, 2013, 6 pages. |
| Barton et al., “Development and Evaluation of a Tool for the Assessment of Footwear Characteristics”, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, vol. 2, Apr. 23, 2009, 13 pages. |
| Hamlin , “The Hamlin Cleanroom Bootie”, MO-LA Inc., Technical Developments, vol. 18, Mar. 1993, 2 pages. |
| IPR2013- 00067 , Excerpts from Man-Made Fiber and Textile Dictionary , Exhibit 2011, Aug. 19, 2013, 12 pages. |
| Lo et al., “Effects of Custom-Made Textile Insoles on Plantar Pressure Distribution and Lower Limb Emg Activity During Turning”, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, vol. 9, Jul. 13, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Office Action, European Patent Application No. 15154607.4 , dated Jan. 5, 2018, 6 pages. |
| Saenz-Cogollo et al., “Pressure Mapping Mat for Tele-Home Care Applications”, Sensors, vol. 16, No. 3, E365, Mar. 11, 2016, 9 pages. |
| Singh et al., “Medical Textiles as Vascular Implants and Their Success to Mimic Natural Arteries”, Journal of functional biomaterials, vol. 6, No. 3, Sep. 2015, 15 pages. |
| Stoppa et al., “Wearable Electronics and Smart Textiles: A Critical Review”, Sensors, vol. 14, No. 7, Jul. 2014, 20 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,668 , Final Office Action, dated Feb. 1, 2019, 29 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,719 , Final Office Action, dated Jan. 24, 2019, 15 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,737 , Final Office Action, dated Jan. 2, 2019, 15 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1262, Reply Brief of Appellant Nike, Inc., Sep. 13, 2019, 38 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1262, Appellee Adidas AG's Response Brief, Aug. 9, 2019, 60 pages. |
| IPR 19-1787, Appellant Adidas AG's Opening Brief, Aug. 30, 2019, 319 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition, European Patent Application No. 13161357.2, dated Apr. 1, 2019, 49 pages. |
| Petitioner Adidas AG's Notice of Appeal, IPR2016-00921, Apr. 19, 2019, pp. 1-79. |
| Principal Brief of Appellant Nike, Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board Case No. IPR2013-00067, May 17, 2019, pp. 1-59. |
| Eberle et al., Clothing Technology, Third English Edition, 2002, 291 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067 , Nike's Notice of Appeal, Nov. 20, 2018, 69 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921 , Decision on Remand—35 USC 144 and 37 CFR 42.5(a), Feb. 19, 2019, pp. 1-67. |
| IPR2016-00921-00922 , Hearing Transcript, Nov. 29, 2018, 37 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921-00922 , Nike's Demonstratives for Additional Oral Hearing, Nov. 15, 2018, pp. 1-21. |
| IPR2016-00921-00922 , Patent Owner Nike's Demonstratives, Jul. 11, 2017, pp. 1-27. |
| IPR2016-00921-00922 , Petitioner's Demonstratives for Supplemental Oral Hearing, Nov. 15, 2018, pp. 1-21. |
| IPR2016-00921-00922 , Record of Oral Hearing, Nov. 15, 2018, 37 pages. |
| IPR2016-00921-00922 , Transcript of Proceedings, Oct. 15, 2018, pp. 1-44. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Decision on Remand—35 USC 144 and 37 CFR42.5(a), Feb. 19, 2019, 67 pages. |
| IPR2016-00922 , Petitioner Adidas AG's Notice of Appeal, Apr. 19, 2019, 75 pages. |
| Advances in Apparel Production, The Textile Institute, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England, 2008, pp. 190-191. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1787, Reply Brief for Appellant Adidas AG, Dec. 23, 2019, 40 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1787, Joint Appendix, Dec. 30, 2019, 582 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1787, Appellee Nike, Inc.'s Response Brief, Nov. 25, 2019, 77 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1262, Appellant's Citation of Supplemental Authority Pursuant to Rule 28(j), Jan. 29, 2020, 11 pages. |
| Appellee Nike Response to Citation of Supplemental Authority, Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1987, May 20, 2020, 3 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1787, Appellant Adidas Citation of Supplemental Authority, May 15, 2020, 31 pages. |
| Notice of Opposition, German Patent Application No. 10 2014 202 432.3, dated Jun. 12, 2020, 42 pages. |
| Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201811276475.8, dated Jun. 19, 2020, 19 pages. |
| Decision on Appeal, Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1262, Apr. 9, 2020, 17 pages. |
| Judgment, Federal Circuit Case No. 19-1262, Apr. 9, 2020, 1 page. |
| Chamberlain, “Knitted Fabrics”, 1919, pp. 80-103, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd., London. |
| Chamberlain, “Principles of Machine Knitting”, 1951, pp. 54-57, The Textile Institute, Manchester. |
| Wignall ,“Knitting”, 1964, pp. 99-101, 116-129, Pitman Publishing, London. |
| European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 20167046.0, dated Aug. 25, 2020, 10 pages. |
| Federal Circuit Case Nos. 19-1787 and 19-1788, Opinion, Jun. 25, 2020, 8 pages. |
| IPR Case No. 2013-00067, Exhibit 2024, Intervenor's Petition for Panel Hearing, Appeal No. 2015-1928, Aug. 20, 2020, 38 pages. |
| IPR Case No. 2013-00067, Patent Owner's Opening Brief on Second Remand, Aug. 20, 2020, 12 pages. |
| IPR Case No. 2013-00067, Patent Owner's Reply Brief on Second Remand, Sep. 3, 202, 7 pages. |
| IPR Case No. 2013-00067, Petitioner's Opening Brief on Remand, Aug. 20, 2020, 12 pages. |
| IPR Case No. 2013-00067, Petitioner's Response Brief on Remand, Sep. 3, 2020, 7 pages. |
| IPR Case No. 2013-00067, Order—Conduct of the Proceeding on Remand, Jul. 24, 2020, 6 pages. |
| Office Action, German Patent Application No. 102014202432.3, dated Sep. 21, 2016, 7 pages. |
| Office Action, European Patent Application No. 15154607.4, dated Apr. 4, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings, European Patent Application No. 15154607.4, mailed Nov. 22, 2018, 7 pages. |
| Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201811276049.4, dated Jul. 30, 2020, 17 pages. |
| IPR2013-00067, Final Written Decision on Remand, dated Mar. 1, 2021, 40 pages. |
| Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201811276049.4, dated Feb. 26, 2021, 13 pages. |
| Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201811276475.8, dated Mar. 9, 2021, 15 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150223552 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
